The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and
offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.for more details please visit
www.indiandentalacademy.com
4. DEFINITION
Water based material that hardens following
an acid base reaction between basic
fluoroaluminosilicate glass and an aqueous
solution of polyacids. (Anusavice)
Glass ionomer is a water- based material
that hardens following an acid base reaction
between fluroaluminosilicate glass particles
and an aqueous solution of polyacid.
(Davidson and Mjor)
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
5. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Silicate Cements - Fletcher (1871)
Adhesion of Resin Totooh Dr.Oscar
Hagger(1951)
Acid Etching- Buonocore (1955)
Composite Resin- Bowen (1958)
Polycarboxylate Cements - D.C. Smith (1968)
GIC (ASPA-I) - B.E.Kent & (1969)
ASPA II with Tartaric Acid Wilson and Crisp
(1972)
ASPA III with Methyl Alcohol (1974)
ASPA IV with Co Polymer of Itaconic Acid
(1975) www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
6. ASPA-X with high Translucency Wilson
Crisp & Abel (1977)
Anhydrous GIC (ASPA-V) - Prosser (1984)
CERMET- McLean & Gasser (1985)
Polyacid Modified Composite Resin (1994).
2002 Giomer
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
7. CLASSIFICATIONS
Philips
Type I - Luting
Type II - Restorative
Type III - Liner & base
Davidson / Mjor
Conventional / Traditional GIC
Resin Modified GIC
Polyacid Modified Resin Composites
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
8. MOUNT:
A) Glass Ionomer Cements
(i) Glass Polyalkeonates
(ii) Glass Polyphosphates
B) Resin modified GIC
C) Polyacid modified composite resin
D)
Auto Cure
Dual Cure
Triple Cure
E)
Type I
Type II
- Type II 1 (AESTHETIC)
- Type II 2 (RESTORATIVE)
Type III
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
10. According to clinical use as:
Type I- Luting
TYPE II- Restorative
Type III- Liner/ Base
Type IV- Pit & Fissure Sealant
Type V- Luting for Orthodontic Purpose
Type VI- Core build up material
Type VII- High fluoride releasing command
set
Type VIII- ART
Type IX- Geriatric & Paediatric GIC
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
12. SETTING REACTION
Decomposition(20 -30%)
Migration
Gelation
Post set hardening
Maturation
Agglomeration of unreacted glass powder surrounded by a silica
gel in an amorphous matrix of hydrated Ca and Al polysalts.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
14. Role of water
Reaction medium
Hydrate the matrix
Classification
Loosely bound water
Tightly bound water
Protection
Vaseline
Dentin bonding agents
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
15. CRACK IN UNPROTECTED GIC CRACK PROPOGATION
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
16. Factors affecting setting
Chemical constituents
- Alumina : Silica ratio
- Fluoride
- Tartaric acid
Particle size
Powder : liquid ratio
Temperature of mixing
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
19. Bond strength
Enamel- 2.6 to 9.6 Mpa
Dentin – 1.1 to 4.5 Mpa
Surface conditioners
Remove smear layer
Increases surface energy
Increases wettability and decreases contact
angle
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
20. Polyacrylic acid- 10% for 15 sec
50% citric acid for 5 sec
25% tannic acid for 30 sec
2% ferric chloride
EDTA
ITS solution, Levine solution
Advantages
No microleakage
Conservative cavity form
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
21. Biocompatibility
High initial pH(0.9 – 1.6)
Properties of polyacrylic acid
high mol wt and heavy chain entanglement
weak acid
ppt by Ca in dentinal tubules
electrostatic attraction of H+
ions
Sensitivity with luting GIC
high initial pH
low P : W ratio
pre existing pulpitis
decrease dentin thickness
Resistance to plaque
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
22. Anticariogenicity
Zone of resistance 3mm(Kidd, Hicks)
Fluoride Action
Physicochemical mechanism
Biological mechanism
Duration of fluoride release?
Structural degradation?
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
24. TETRAHEDRON GLASS SKELETAL STRUCTURE
F- ION NOT IN STRUCTURE
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
25. Aesthetics- Translucency due to glass fillers
Dimensional Stability - ~ 3% contraction
Dissolution and disintegration: by Dissolution of matrix
forming species
Early water contamination
Plaque acid/ APF gel application
Mechanical wear
Solubility 4 wt%
Clinical Life of the restoration:
83% showed retention after 10 years
0 to 70 % failure rate
Strength:
Compressive strength- 150 Mpa
Tensile strength- 6.6 Mpa
KHN- 48
Radiopacity:: Fairly radio opaque
Abrasion resistance: Satisfactory if material is supported by
sound tooth structure.www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
29. FINISHING & POLISHING
Remove excess cement with sharp blade to
reduce gross contour
After 24 hours, fine diamond with air/ water
spray for gross contour
Rubber polishing points for refining
Polishing discs for glossy finish
Sealing with resin sealant or vaseline
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
30. INDICATIONS
LUTING CEMENT (Type 1 GIC)
Tendency towards plastic deformation
Particle size - 4 to 15µ
Film thickness - 10 to 20µ
P : W ratio – 1.5:1
No application of pressure- GIC has thixotropic
Fast setting, no need of protection,
Conditioning or no conditioning ?
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
31. RESTORATIVE CEMENT
Erosion/ abrasion lesions
Class III & V lesions
Restoration on primary teeth
Restoration in rampant caries cases
Laminate restorations
ART (Class I Lesions)
Micro cavity preparation
Small to medium size class I lesion
Repair of open margins around crowns and
inlays
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
32. P : W ratio – 3:1 (2.9:1 to 3.6:1) for
conventional GIC
For anhydrous GIC – 6.8: 1
Polishing after 24 hours
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
33. LINER AND BASE
As a liner to protect pulp from thermal insult
As base to replace carious dentin
Mount technique for base application
Sandwich technique-
Good bonding(0.3 – 6 MPa)
Less shrinkage
Microlekage reduced
Lamination with amalgam:
GIC can bond to metal oxides
3-4 MPa bond strength were obtained
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
34. Pit & fissure sealant
pit and fissure orifices are patent
Luting of orthodontic brackets and bands
Core build up
In Endodontics
Sealing the root canals
Sealing and restoring the pulp chamber
Repairing the perforation
Rarely treating the vertical fracture of tooth
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
35. CONTRAINDICATIONS
Class IV lesions and fractured incisors
Large labial restoration where esthetic
is of prime concern
Lost cusp area
Class II lesions where conventional
cavities are prepared
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
37. HIGH VISCOSITY GIC
Developed as an alternative to amalgam.
Packable / condensable glass ionomer cements
Composition: Powder: Ca,La,Al fluorosilicate glass
Liquid: PA,TA,water and benzoic acid
INDICATIONS: Molar restoration of primary teeth
Intermediate restoration
Core build up material
For A R T
ADVANTAGES: Packable or condensable
Improved wear resistance
Easy to use
Low solubility
Rapid finishing possible
Decrease moisture sensitivity
DISADVANTAGES: Limited life
Moderately polishable
Not esthetic
. www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
39. LOW VISCOSITY GIC
1. Also called as Flowable GIC
2. Low P:L ratio thus increase flow.
3. Use for lining, pit and fisure sealer, endodontic
sealer and for sealing hyper sensitive cervical
area.
Eg fuji lining LC, Ketac – endo etc.
Fuji lining LC Ketac-Endowww.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
40. METAL MODIFIED GIC
1 Seed & Wilson (1980) invented miracle mix
2 Spherical silver amalgam alloy+Type II G I C in
ratio 7:1
3 Mc lean & Gasser (1985) invented ceremet
Glass powder sintered to metal fillers (<5%) at
800°C
4 Minimal improvement in mechanical property
- Compressive strength – 150 Mpa
- Modulus of elasticity is slightly lower
- KHN – 39
- Tensile strength – slightly more 6.7 Mpa
- Slight increase in wear resistance.
Fluoride release
Max for miracle mix (3350µg, 4040µg)
And min for cermets (200µg, 300µg)
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
41. Indications: Class I cavities in primary teeth
Core build up material
Lining of class II amalgam restorations
Root caps for teeth under over dentures
As a preventive restoration
Contraindications: Anterior restoration
In areas of high occlusal loading
Advantages:
Ease for placement
Adhesion to tooth structure and anticariogenic
potential
Crown cutting can be done immediately
Increased wear resistance
Disadvantages:
Esthetically poor
Tooth discoloration
Rough surface
Reduced W.L and S.Twww.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
43. RESIN MODIFIED GIC
Objective:
To overcome low early strength and moisture sensitivity
1. Defined as hybrid cement that sets partly by acid base
reaction and partly by polymerisation reaction (Mc
Lean)
2 Materials that are modified by the inclusion of resin,
generally to make the them more photo curable
(Nicholson)
3. Powder – Ion leachable glass and initiators
liquid – water, Poly acrylic acid, HEMA (15-25%),
methacrylate monomers.
4. Setting reaction: - Dual cure
- Tricurewww.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
44. PROPERTIES
Esthetic – Superior than conventional GIC
Fluoride release:
Conventional
440µgF after 14 days
650 µgF after 30 days
RMGIC-1200 µgF after 14 days
1600 µgF after 30 days
Strength: Diametral strength
Conventional
G I C: 6.6Mpa
RMGIC: 20 Mpa
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
45. Compressive strength
Conventional G I C:150Mpa
RMGIC: 105Mpa
Hardness:
Conventional GIC:48KHN
RMGIC:40KHN
Shear bond strength: lesser than
conventional GIC (Acc to skinner)
Marginal adaptation: poor compare to
conventional GIC
Biocompatibility: Transient rise in
Temperature
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
46. Advantages
Long working time due to photo curing
Improved setting characteristics
Decrease sensitivity to water (but not significantly,
Journal of Conservative Dentistry, June 2005)
Increase early strength
Finishing & polishing can be done immediately
Improved tensile strength.
Better adhesion to composite restoration
Increase fluoride release.
Repairable.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
47. Disadvantage
Biocompatibility is controversial
More setting shrinkage leading increase
microleakage and poor marginal adaptation
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
48. Uses
As a luting cement (FUJI PLUS Ketac-cem 3M ESPE, Fuji Cem)
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
49. As a liner and bases
(Fuji LC)
As a pit and fissure
(Vitre Bond)
Core build up material
(Fuji I LC)
Retrograde filling material
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
50. POLYACID MODIFIED COMPOSITE
RESIN
Also called as compomer
Defined as : material that contain both the
essential components of GIC but in an
amount insufficient to carry out acid base
reaction in dark.
They are developed to combine fluoride
release of GIC and durability of composite
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
51. Composition: one paste system containing ion
leach able glass, sodium fluoride, polyacid
modified monomer but no water
Recently 2 paste or powder liquid system is
introduced.
Powder:
Strontium aluminium flurosilicate glass particles, metal
oxides,and intiators
Liquid:
Polymerizable methacrylate/caboxylic acidic monomers
multi functional acrylate monomers and water ;
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
52. Setting reaction
1. Initially light curing forms resin network
around the glass
2. After 2 to 3 month there is water uptake
which initiates slow acid base reaction and
fluoride release.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
53. Properties
Adhesion –Micromechanical, absence of
water thus no self adhesion
Fluoride release minimal.
Physical properties better than conventional
GIC but less than composite.
Optical properties superior to conventional
GIC.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
54. Uses
Pit and fissure sealant
Restoration of primary teeth
Liners and bases
Core build up material
For class III & V lesions
Cervical erosion / abrasion
Repair of defective margins in restorations
Sealing of root surfaces for over dentures
Reterograde filling material.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
55. Contraindications
Class IV carious lesions
Large areas of labial surfaces
Class II cavities where conventional cavity
is prepared
Lost cusp areas
Under full crown or PFM crowns.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
56. Advantages
Ease of use
Easy adaptation to the tooth
Good esthetics
More working time than RM GIC
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
58. Self hardening RM GIC
Activated purely by chemical polymerisation
reaction
Contains benzoyl peroxide and T-Amines
Advantages
Ease of handling
Fluoride release
Higher compressive strength
No additional set up for light activation
Uses:
Luting of stainless steel crown, orthodontic
brackets, space maintainers.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
59. Fluoride charged material
To overcome the shortcomings of
conventional fluoride releasing materials.
Consist of 2 part
Restorative part
Charge part
Still under experimental stage
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
60. Low pH “Smart” Material
Releases fluoride when pH falls below
the critical level
Fluoride release is episodic and not
continuous
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
61. Bioactive glass
Introduce by Hench in 1973
Acid dissolution of glass forms calcium and
phosphate rich layers
The glass can form bioactive bonds with bone cells
Better than hydroxyapatite
Can grow calcium and phosphate rich layer in
presence of calcium and phosphate saturated
saliva.
They are less abrasive than feldspathic porcelain to
opposing teeth
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
62. Uses
Bone cement
Retrograde filling material
For perforation repair
Augmentation of resorbed alveolar ridge
Implant cementation
Infra bony pocket correction
Bio glass ceramic crown.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
63. Fiber-reinforced Glass Ionomer
Cements
Al and Sio2 fibers added to glass powder (PRIMM)
Diameter of fiber is 2µm.
Advantages:
Increased wear resistance.
Improved handling characteristics
Increased depth of cure
Reduction of polymerization shrinkage
Improved flexure strength(50Mpa)
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
64. GIOMERS
True hybridization of GIC and composite
Combine fluoride release and fluoride
recharge of GIC with esthetic easy
polishability and strength of composite
Based on PRG technique.
Two types:
S- PRG :Reaction of entire glass
S-PRG: Reaction with glass surface
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
65. INDICATIONS
Class I, II, III, IV, and Class V cavities
Restoration of cervical erosion and Root caries
Laminates and core build up
Restoration of primary teeth.
Repair of fracture of porcelain and composites
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
66. Advantages
Increase wear resistance
Increase Radiopacity (glass filler)
Ideal shade match (improved light diffusion and
fluorescence)
High and sustained fluoride release and recharge
Provide almost complete seal against bacterial
microleakage
Little mechanical and chemical pulp irritation
Inhibit demineralization
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
68. CONCLUSION
GIC’s have come a long ways since its modest
beginning in 1969. Even though research can
boast of substantial improvements, certain
essential properties still seem to be wanting
and further clinical trials are warranted for a
majority of these developments. At this point of
time, we are left wondering if GIC will ever be
able to dominate tomorrow’s restorative scene
or will it go into total oblivion. Who knows?
Only the future will tell. Let us wish GIC all the
best for the coming years.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com