This article considers the definition of the economic mechanism of import
substitution as one of the new directions in the theory and practice of the modern
enterprise management process, the industry and the economy as a whole. The authors
identify the main aspects of the concept and describe the structure of this economic
mechanism. Moreover, they determine the role of the economic mechanism in the
agrarian economy and the need for its improvement to solve the problems of import
substitution
2. E.F. Amirova, L.I. Petrova, E. V. Ziuzya, V. V. Sleptsov, T. I. Krishtaleva and M. V. Kuznetsova
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 927 editor@iaeme.com
Cite this Article: E.F. Amirova, L.I. Petrova, E. V. Ziuzya, V. V. Sleptsov, T. I.
Krishtaleva and M. V. Kuznetsova, Import Substitution as an Economic Incentive
Mechanism for Russian Commodity Producers, International Journal of Civil
Engineering and Technology, 10(02), 2019, pp. 926–931
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=10&IType=02
1. INTRODUCTION
Due to the aggravation of the foreign policy situation caused by the changed foreign economic
and geopolitical realities, Russia is forced to adopt the import substitution paradigm in all
sectors to support the sustainable operation of the national economy mechanism. The term
"import substitution" in Russia refers to the type of economic strategy aimed at protection of
domestic producers by replacing imported goods and technologies with domestic products
[Amirova, & Sadykova]. These products are sold to increase the competitiveness of the national
economy, incite the modernization, and economic efficiency of production. At the same time,
import substitution is defined as total industrialization of the economy, which will contribute
to the creation of large-scale high-tech industries and the reduction of the national
unemployment rate.
Our country depends on imports, and the problem of replacing foreign goods with domestic
ones existed historically [Amirova, & Zakirova]. However, the 2014 sanctions imposed by
Western countries forced the government to pay deliberate attention to the problem. Thus, by
the end of 2014, a large-scale import substitution program, covering a significant number of
industries, had been approved. In the context of the emerging need for import substitution, the
problem of the need to improve the economic mechanism of import substitution in enterprises
and in the sectors of the agro-industrial complex has become acute. In this regard, the
assessment of potential and the systematization of the mechanisms and instruments of import
substitution policy in Russia have become particularly important.
2. DATA AND METHODS
The economic mechanism of import substitution is directly related to various economic
management methods. The gradual improvement of the economic mechanism, the set of
economic instruments for incitement of production and management is an important criterion
for a successful transition to economic management methods.
The most important methodological, methodical and practical condition for implementation
of the import substitution strategy is the elaboration of its development stages. According to
the studies carried on in each industry, they must be special, therefore import substitution
programs must be developed individually, in relation to each industry, production, but they
also have much in common. Both general scientific research methods – dialectical, induction
and deduction, analogy and modeling, analysis of factual and historical data, and
methodological principles for analyzing economic phenomena – classification and comparison,
as well as concrete scientific methods – comparative analysis, monographic, statistical-
economic, graphical research methods, are used herein.
3. RESULTS
The problem of import substitution is extremely relevant to Russia's economy in the
international political environment. The structure of Russian imports accounts for more than
80% of the manufacturing industry output. As a result, it is necessary to develop a phased
import substitution strategy, and the economic mechanism of import substitution should
3. Import Substitution as an Economic Incentive Mechanism for Russian Commodity Producers
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 928 editor@iaeme.com
primarily incite Russian producers to highly efficient production. At the first stage of this
strategy implementation, it is important to constantly monitor the imported goods and services,
examine their quality, production conditions, advantages and disadvantages, as well as the
technological requirements. The fact that imported goods do not always meet the quality
standards should also be taken into consideration. Quite often, imported products cannot be
effectively used due to inconsistencies with local technologies, consumer preferences, lack of
appropriate professional training, and differences in natural and climatic conditions. It is
necessary to identify those products that cannot be replaced due to the lack of necessary natural
and climatic conditions (such as citrus fruits, special types of fruits, types of mineral water,
certain vegetables). At the same time, there are many products that do not need to be imported.
For example, agriculture of the Republic of Tatarstan does not need to import most types of
grain, sugar, potatoes, all types of animal products – milk, meat, eggs, etc. They can be
successfully produced in sufficient quantities under existing conditions [Ziyadin, Khamitova,
Khassenova, Suieubayeva, & Agumbayeva].
Particular attention should be paid to the study of foreign production technologies, the
means to improve product quality and employee competencies, inter-sectoral relations,
methods of capital intensity and reduce production costs. These factors can be used to organize
domestic production and create new industries. At the second stage of import substitution
strategy implementation it is important to establish the import of equipment, spare parts, raw
materials, inputs, and then reproduce them in mechanical engineering based on domestic R &
D base, to train relevant specialists and to form creative teams. In an open economy, it is
required not only to use advanced technologies, machinery and equipment, new plant varieties
and animal breeds but also to create one's own advanced reproduction, otherwise international
competitors will always keep their market and become more competitive. The result of this
stage of import substitution strategy implementation is the formation of a national version of
the production of import-substituting goods. At this stage, it is essential to monitor the
emerging inter-industry relations, their role in the production of import-substituting products,
the possibility of providing new production with raw materials and labor force on the scale of
demand.
The development of import-substituting production involves the development of the
concept of the domestic product and the organization of its experimental production at the third
stage. The fourth stage in implementing the concept of import-substituting production involves
bringing it to the state of global competitiveness in terms of quality and sales prices. It is
important to check these products in the domestic market, as well as the availability of raw
materials, spare parts, containers, and logistics. After that, it can be expected that the new
products produced will meet international standards and can be exported to many countries and
markets.
To date, the basic elements of the economic mechanism of import substitution in the agro-
industrial complex are as follows: the mechanism for agribusiness and entrepreneurship
development in the agro-industrial complex; the mechanism of foreign economic relations, the
functioning and creation of joint domestic enterprises with foreign companies; the mechanism
for incitement and the enterprise employees motivation [Gazetdinov, Gazetdinov, &
Semicheva]; the mechanism of investment activities and the investments of enterprises of the
agro-industrial complex; financial and tax mechanism of establishing payments of economic
entities to the state budget and centralized funds for insurance, social security and support of
rural producers; the mechanism of economic contractual relations of economic partners in the
regulated and free market; the mechanism for the acquisition by business entities (individuals
and legal entities) of production means of products sales in the relevant market segment; a
4. E.F. Amirova, L.I. Petrova, E. V. Ziuzya, V. V. Sleptsov, T. I. Krishtaleva and M. V. Kuznetsova
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 929 editor@iaeme.com
mechanism for reforming the economic structure in rural areas and transforming public sector
enterprises into the most modern market structures. All these elements are interrelated and form
an organizational and economic system, which can be taken as the basis of the state’s economic
policy, including in the agrarian sector. In 2017, for the first time since the beginning of the
sanction wars, Russia has increased the imports of agricultural products. In total, last year, 21.5
million tons of foodstuffs and raw materials (except textile) were imported to Russia worth
28.8 billion USD. This is 6% and 15% more than in 2016, respectively. The increase in imports
of agricultural products is also confirmed by the data of the Ministry of Agriculture: according
to its information, in January-November 2017, Russia imported agricultural goods in the
amount of 25.7 billion USD, which is almost 16% more than in the same period of the previous
year.
Food imports (not only agricultural ones) are strongly influenced by two factors: household
income and the dollar exchange rate. The reason is that not all Russian products are competitive
in price and quality, that is why as the income grows or the ruble strengthens, the population
starts buying imported goods [Kuchukova, et al.]. Several indicators can be used to characterize
the growth of income. For example, the indicators of food products sales can be used instead
of income index. Fig. 1 shows the dynamics of the index of the physical sales volume of food
products (in comparable prices). For presentation purposes, the figure shows the ratio of
purchases in each of the months in 2013-2017. In a favorable economic situation, the volume
of purchases increases. The graphic shows that only from July 2017 retail food sales slowly
began to grow – for the first time since August 2014. In December 2017, more products were
bought than in December 2016, but less than in December 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Figure. 1. Volume indices of retail sales of food products, % to the corresponding month of 2012.
The dependence of imports on the exchange rate of the national currency was observed
during the 1998 crisis. A sharp drop in the exchange rate of the ruble in August 1998 affected
imports. If in August 1998 a dollar was worth about 6.5 rubles, then in October of the same
year it cost 15.5 rubles. This influenced the import of food and agricultural products: it
decreased from 13.3 to 7.3 million USD, or by 45%.
Imports began to grow only two years after 1998, exceeding the pre-crisis level in 2004,
and by 2007 it had already exceeded the level of 1997 by half. The repetition of that situation
is observed now. After the devaluation, Russian agricultural producers obviously received
benefits. However, if the period of special opportunities was not used for modernization
purposes, increasing labor productivity and competitiveness of Russian products, imports will
increase. Moreover, it will grow in those products that will never be produced in Russia due to
80.0
85.0
90.0
95.0
100.0
105.0
110.0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
5. Import Substitution as an Economic Incentive Mechanism for Russian Commodity Producers
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 930 editor@iaeme.com
climatic conditions. It is not by chance that in 2017 the import of fruits and nuts increased. This
group of products accounts for about 15% in the structure of imports. Russian exports are also
growing. Compared to 2016, exports of food products and agricultural raw materials grew by
21.5% – to 20.3 billion USD. An important result of this year is that import growth rates are
significantly lower than food export growth rates: 15% against 21.5% [Shagaida]. Therefore,
successfully implemented import substitution policy contributes not only to the emergence of
the national product and improvement of its quality but also to an increase in the standard of
living of the population. With the development of agro-industrial production, new jobs appear,
which reduces unemployment in the country. To improve the quality of products, new
technologies are required [Amirova], which has a positive effect on the development of the
scientific and technical complex. Better quality will attract the consumer, which will force the
manufacturers to think about expanding the production capacity [13-18].
4. CONCLUSION
Thus, the structural changes in the economic mechanism of import substitution will increase
the efficiency of production activities in general, which, in turn, will positively influence the
solution of economic problems. All the efforts should be focused not at domestic production
of the final product, but on the determining factors – high-precision machine-tool construction,
seed farming, agriculture, tool industry, pharmaceuticals, and so on. That is, it is necessary to
develop not only the production of certain industries within the country, but also to increase
the overall level of development of economy, social sphere, infrastructure, making the state
able to compete on equal terms with the developed countries.
The general business strategy also needs fundamental changes. If in the last 20 years
Russian business preferred to gain momentum in the trade and financial sphere, then at the new
stage, which is characterized by intense competition in the global market, it must increasingly
focus on material production, including the agro-industrial complex, the creation and expansion
of new material industries and productions, the growth of ready-to-consume products, the
expansion of exports, often very profitable, the transition from a predominantly commercial
and banking capitalism to industrial one.
REFERENCES
[1] Amirova E.F. "Roadmap" of import substitution of the Russian Federation. The main
directions of development of agribusiness in modern conditions. Collection of articles on
the materials of the II All-Russian (national) scientific-practical conference. - Kurgan:
Kurgan State Agricultural Academy. TS Maltsev, 2018. p. 9-12.
[2] Amirova E.F. The role of innovation in ensuring the import substitution of food. Modern
research and development. Astrakhan: Publishing house: Scientific Center "Olympus". -
2017. № 4 (12). - p. 355-358. eISSN: 2415-8402.
[3] Amirova E.F. The functioning of the grain product subcomplex under the food embargo.
Bulletin of the Kazan State Agrarian University. 2018. T. 13. No. 1 (48). P.147-151.
[4] Amirova EF, Zakirova F.N. Aspects of improving the economic situation in Russia after
the introduction of sanctions. Prospects for sustainable development of the agroindustrial
complex: a collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference
[Electronic resource]. - Electron. - Omsk: Publishing house of FSBEI HE Omsk State
Agrarian University, 2017. P. 491-494.
[5] Amirova EF, Sadykova L.I. Implications of import substitution. Prospects for sustainable
development of the agroindustrial complex: a collection of materials of the International
Scientific and Practical Conference [Electronic resource]. - Electron. - Omsk: Publishing
house of FSBEI HE Omsk GAU, 2017. P.486-491.
6. E.F. Amirova, L.I. Petrova, E. V. Ziuzya, V. V. Sleptsov, T. I. Krishtaleva and M. V. Kuznetsova
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 931 editor@iaeme.com
[6] Gazetdinov Sh.M., Gazetdinov M.Kh., Semicheva O.S. Prerequisites of the formation of
territorial systems in the context of economic modernization. The role and place of civilized
entrepreneurship in the Russian economy. Collection of scientific papers. Moscow:
Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Entrepreneurship, 2016. P 37-44.
[7] Shagayda N.I. Food imports are growing as expected. [Access mode free]. Laboratory of
Agricultural Policy IE. - https://iep.ru/ru/import-prodovolstviia-rastet-ozhidaemo.html
[8] Amirova E.F., Voronkova O.Y., Pyurveeva K.A., Shatalov M.A., Panteleeva T.A.,
Sorokina O.A. Functioning of agroindustrial complex in the conditions of digital economy.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. 2018. Т. 9. № 12. С.
586-594.
[9] Kuchukova, N., Turarbekov, M., Agumbayeva, A. Influence of fiscal and monetary policy
of Kazakhstan on modernization and economic growth in the conditions of globalization.
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics
7(5), с. 1086-1095, 2016
[10] Osadchy E.A., Akhmetshin E.M., Amirova E.F., Bochkareva T.N., Gazizyanova Yu.Yu.,
Yumashev A.V. Financial Statements of a Company as an Information Base for Decision-
Making in a Transforming Economy. European Research Studies Journal. 2018. Т. 21. №
2. С. 339-350.
[11] Zhahov N.V., Krivoshlykov V.S., Shatokhin M.V. Ways of modern agriculture in: specifics
and state support. В сборнике: Proceedings of the 30th International Business Information
Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2017 - Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic
development, Innovation Management, and Global Growth 30, Vision 2020: Sustainable
Economic development, Innovation Management, and Global Growth. 2017. С. 3646-
3652.
[12] Ziyadin, S., Khamitova, D., Khassenova, K., Suieubayeva, S., Agumbayeva, A. Economic
factors influencing the development of China's foreign trade policy with Kazakhstan.
Economic Annals-XXI 155(11-12), с. 14-17, 2015
[13] Yemelyanov, V., Tochilkina, T., Vasilieva, E., Nedelkin, A., & Shved, E. (2018). Computer
diagnostics of the torpedo ladle cars. Paper presented at the AIP Conference Proceedings,
, 2034 doi:10.1063/1.5067351
[14] Vasilev, B. U., & Zyrin, V. O. (2016). Algorithmic methods to improve the semiconductor
converter performance effectiveness. Paper presented at the 2016 International Siberian
Conference on Control and Communications, SIBCON 2016 - Proceedings,
doi:10.1109/SIBCON.2016.7491849
[15] Shpenst, V. A., Vasiliev, B. Y., Kalashnikov, O. V., & Oleynikova, A. M. (2018). Ways of
telecommunications interaction arrangement for microprocessor devices of different types
in composition of multi-motor electric drives. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics:
Conference Series, , 1015(2) doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1015/2/022008
[16] Yemelyanov, V., Yemelyanova, N., & Nedelkin, A. (2018). Diagnostic system to
determine lining condition. Paper presented at the MATEC Web of Conferences, 172
doi:10.1051/matecconf/201817204001
[17] Zhukovskiy, Y. L., Vasilev, B. U., & Koteleva, N. I. (2017). Quality estimation of
continuing professional education of technical specialists. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference "Quality Management, Transport and
Information Security, Information Technologies", IT and QM and IS 2017, 704-707.
doi:10.1109/ITMQIS.2017.8085921
[18] Aleksandrova, T. N., Nikolaeva, N., & Romashev, A. (2015). An experimental and
theoretical approach to the assessment of the specific surface of apatite-nepheline ore in the
process of grinding. Paper presented at the International Multidisciplinary Scientific
GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, 577-583.