Causes Of Bismarck Unification Germany

Causes Of Bismarck Unification Germany
Many believe that Prince Otto Edward Leopold von Bismarck, later known as just Bismarck, was the main reason for German unification. Bismarck
was the first chancellor of this new country as Bismarck had changed 39 smaller states, into one large industrial power. The unification of Germany
had a large impact on the balance of powers in Europe. Bismarck dominated Germany and European politics for nearly 30 years. However some
historians argue that Bismarck was only this successful and powerful because of circumstances out of his control. Nationalism and liberalism were
rising as an ideology, the decline of Austria had an effect and 1848 was nicknamed as a year of revolutions due to the amount of revolutions that took
place also factored in, but at the heart of all these is Bismarck's use of deception and realpolitik and manipulating situations to his advantage.
The traditional belief that Bismarck unified Germany because of the wars with France Austria and Denmark. Although these are important in the
grand scheme of unifying Germany. For Bismarck to provoke these wars and turn them into his advantage, foundations had to be laid to support these
actions other factors had been in place to support Bismarck and his belief for a unified Germany. Nationalism was one of these factors. Revolutions
flourished and changed countries in Europe. One of these was the coup d'Г©tat led by Napoleon Bonaparte to "save" France from the terror reign of
Robespierre., He aimed to unite the whole
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Power Of The Great Powers Of Great Britain
Using Europe as essentially a blank tablet on which to create their own Balance of Power, the Great Powers of Great Britain, Prussia, Austria, and
Russia (with France, the defeated power, playing a lesser role) re–drew the map. There had been other pressing matters to settle: the rights of German
Jews, the abolition of the slave trade and navigation on European rivers, not to mention the restoration of the Bourbon royal family in France, Spain and
Naples, the constitution of Switzerland, issues of diplomatic precedence and, last but not least, the foundation of a new German confederation to
replace the defunct Holy Roman Empire. Sensing that Napoleon was vulnerable, an Alliance of Russia, Prussia, Austria, and Great Britain formed, and
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At many points during negotiations, various powers threatened the use of force, and it seemed that some questions cannot be resolved diplomatically
power. However, the Congress of Vienna ended peacefully, and laid the foundation of relative peace between the great powers of Europe for 40 years
until the Crimean War of 1854–1856
The great victorious powers (Russia, Britain, Austria and Prussia) invited other states of Europe to send plenipotentiaries to Vienna for a peace
conference. There had been other urgent issues to be resolved: the rights of Jews in Germany, the abolition of the slave trade and navigation in
European rivers, not to mention the restoration of the Bourbon royal family in France, Spain and Naples, the constitution of Switzerland, issues of
diplomatic precedence and, last but not least, the foundation of a new German confederation to replace the late Holy Roman Empire. The root of the
crisis could, again, is in a failure of Congress system (and again in the Holy Alliance): the omission of the Ottoman Empire of European peace. In
1830 Czartoryski, who was on the wrong side of a Polish rebellion against Russian side, he regretted that despite perpetual peace had become the
conception of the most powerful monarchs of the continent (he referred in particular to Tsar Alexander) diplomacy had corrupted and turned into poison.
The Congress of Vienna also to ban the slave trade in the Atlantic. All the great

Explain Why Did The Frankfurt Parliament Fail
Why did the Frankfurt parliament fail? Throughout the 1840's many German states were under pressure from liberal demonstrators and nationalists
who wanted a revolutionary change and greater political representation. Those standing for a unified Germany recognised that a unified Germany with
a constitution and election would be the most efficient way of securing their political freedom. However, German monarchs such as the king of Prussia,
Frederick William IV feared that a united Germany under nationalists conditions would cause Germany to lose its power and influence in their land
and territories. After the ferocious demonstration in not only Berlin in 1848 but also in other states and nations, the king agreed to draft a prussian
constitution ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Frankfurt parliament failed to accomplish its goals, the attempt of creating a unified Germany through political reform did not work as it was
intended to. One can argue that there are multiple reasons for why the parliament failed but the strength of the conservative forces, the divisions within
the parliament and its inability to make decisions were significant causes as to why the parliaments weaknesses were overpowering and caused it to fail.
One of the contributing factors to the failure of the Frankfurt parliament was the divisions within the parliament itself. The parliament was mainly
built upon liberals in the middle class who happened to be males that had to be1 of a certain age as well as being economically stable, i.e it did not
represent the people as a whole. This was a problem itself as only one of the classes was being represented, leaving the other two omitted which
arguably caused problems within and outside of the parliament. The parliament arguably consisted of three different groups, the liberals who wanted to
safeguard the rights of the central government and the individual rights, the radicals who wanted to replace the princes and form a unified republic and
thirdly the conservatives who did not want the central government or

Should the State of East Prussia be Returned to Germany?
The region of East Prussia (Kalingrad Oblast) was taken by Russia from Germany, and was previously owned by Germany for over 700 years.
Considering the history of the area and homes of millions taken and robbed, the state of East Prussia should be returned to Germany. In addition, the
remnants of the local citizens and relatives of victims should be compensated for their hardships and gained the right to return home. Near the end of
World War II nearly 2 million civilians evacuated East Prussia, Because of the imminent Soviet invasion. Following the Second World War Germany
was undergoing judgment by the allies and the victors of Europe. At the Potsdam meeting, they unanimously agreed that the ultimate root of German
aggression and militarism was Prussia and following this meeting set out to abolish it. Millions of people were evacuated from the area and
thousands were killed and raped. Today 1 million descendants of people kick out from the area wait to return home. Many people feel cheated and the
Soviet Union expelled all non–Russians from the region and re–settled their own people in the territory. By the time the Soviet Union fell, very few of
the original ethnic Germans, Poles, and Lithuanians remained. Today East Prussia is known as Kaliningrad Oblast and is a federated state of the Russian
Federation, completely cut off from the rest of Russia. Today 86.4% of the population of Kaliningrad Oblast is Russian, 3.7% are Ukrainian, 3.6% are
Belarusian, 1.1% is

The Political Life Of Otto Von Bismarck
Otto von Bismarck was born in 1815 to wealthy family of the junker class. His father was a Prussian Military officer and his mother was the daughter
of a politician. Bismarck went on to have many political positions in his life. The two most important are, his time as Minister President of Prussia and
as Chancellor of the German Empire. Throughout his political career Bismarck proved to be a man who would change ideals if he thought it would
yield the best results.
In 1862 Bismarck was appointed as the Minister President of Prussia. Bismarck 's views were that of Realpolitik. Realpolitik is a way of viewing things
in a practical manner not in a moral or ideological way. (162) This was evident throughout his career. During his time Minister President, he mostly
focused on foreign policy. Although domestically he wanted to stop the liberals who were in the Prussian parliament. liberals thought that the
government 's actions at the time were unconstitutional. Bismarck, on the other hand, believed that there was no way that the constitution was meant
to undermine the state. (163) Shortly after this he moved his focus to his foreign policy, the unification of the German states. This all started with his
blood and iron speech in 1862 where he is quoted saying, "Not by speeches and votes of the majority, are the great questions of the time decided – that
was the error of 1848 and 1849 – but by iron and blood.". (163) This lead up to a number wars to achieve his goal of unification.

How Did Zollverein Contribute To The Unification Of Germany
German nationalism was a crucial part of the country's unification that developed over time. Germany's nationalism began during the Napoleonic Wars
of 1799 to 1815. France's leader at the time, Napoleon, lead in the invasion of German territory. This destruction prompted Germany's bourgeoisie to
want a modern German nation–state with its own cultural identity. The state would ideally be built on liberal democracy, constitutionalism,
representation, and popular sovereignty. The Treaty of Vienna was created after the Napoleonic Wars in attempt to establish a German
–nation state.
Instead, a collection of German states that lacked strong federal institutions joined together under Prussian rule. This was known as a "Customs Union,"
or Zollverein.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Tensions between the two states developed with the rise of Otto von Bismarck, a political figure of Germany, to power. In 1848, an all–German
parliament in Frankfurt was created. The goal of this parliament was to make a constitution for all German states. The series of liberal revolutions that
had occurred over time reached a climax when people rebelled against the parliament, mainly because of Prussia and Austria's rivalry. This caused
supporters of the parliament to advocate a small German nation–state with Austria excluded (Gale). As this revolution took place, Bismarck was
persuaded to reenter the government in order to protect the monarchy. Bismarck attended the Frankfurt Parliament and made his traditionalist opinions
known through speeches. Bismarck was then appointed envoy to the Bundestag in 1851, which is when he began to gain power (Otto Gale). As can be
seen, a parliament was created as an attempt to unify all German states, but tensions between Prussia and Austria caused a rebellion against the
constitution. In an attempt to end the rebellion, some of the promoters of the parliament opened up the idea of a unified Germany without Austria to
the Prussian

Bureaucracy In Germany
The Prussian state developed a well institutionalized bureaucracy and a well–developed legal system with strong protection of private property and
enforcement of contracts. What was the main drive behind the development of an efficient meritocratic government in Prussia? Explain how this (the
main drive in the prior answer) promoted an efficient bureaucracy. (Chapter 4)
Prussia was a liberal autocracy and the citizens did not have any way to directly hold the state accountable for these rights, however even with this type
of government structure, the state had sustainable protections regarding the rights of its citizens. What caused the successfulness in the development of
an efficient meritocratic government in Prussia was its Rechtsstaat. Rechtsstaat ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, the kaiser could not intrude in citizens' legal cases. The government was regulated and transparent and it later developed legal limitations
on arbitrary rulers. Fukuyama states, that as a result of these policies in the Prussian government, Germany's industrialization, economy and
development increased significantly from 1871 to 1941.
Consequently, Germany surpassed Britain's industrial potential in Europe.
2) What is corruption? Why is corruption a serious problem? (Chapter 5)
Corruption is a vital obstruction to the economic growth and equality regarded in countries, especially poor, undeveloped countries. Corruption is also
regarded as officials using public resources for private advantages. These definitions suggest that corruption occurs in modern or developing states only.
Corruption can be critical for developing countries; an example of this is where foreign aid and loans are used for private gain by officials instead of
aiding the country. Countries that are corrupt generally have difficult problems in providing services, enforcing laws and representing the public's

World War I: The Unification Of Germany
National Unification was an evident theme in the time period between 1848 and 1914. Nationalism, ––––, was responsible for the creation and
decimation of multiple nations in Europe. Between 1848 and 1914, this social movement was responsible for the unification of various kingdoms into
the centralized state of Germany, the decimation of the Austrian Empire into a weak and divided monarchy, and the concept of PanSlavism and social
reforms in Russia. The rise of a unified German state in 1871 radically altered the balance of power in Europe; the story of its unification can be
credited to the increased sense of nationalism between the German states from 1848–1914. The first sign of German unification can be traced to the
establishment of the Zollverein ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, the primary factors in the German unification are a result of the political intellect of Otto Von Bismarck, the prime minister ofPrussia.
Bismarck manipulated the idea of nationalism to appeal to both liberals and conservatives and to achieve his goal: a German state. Bismarck's use of
Realpolitik, the idea that one should do whatever necessary to accomplish his or her goal, is evident in his speech to the Prussian Parliament, "...it is
not by speeches and majority resolutions that the great question of the time are decided...but by iron and blood". Bismarck is a supporter of
nationalism, but believes that war and industrialization are the only ways to achieve this. His appreciation of "iron and blood" is evident in the
strategic wars he waged in order to instill nationalism and gain support among the German people, after defeating the Austrians in the Seven Weeks
War, the northern German states joined Prussia and formed the North German Confederation (Pearl 172). After the Franco Prussian War, in which
Bismarck tricked France into

Bismarck: Machiavellian Poltician
Throughout history men have been struggling to become the
strongest or most dominant force in society. Scores of men,
throughout history, have taken notice that it is easier to
control several smaller states as opposed to one unified
state. In the late 15th and early 16th centuries a man by the
name of Nicolo Machiavelli reflected the actions of famous
men and their assent to power in his book The Prince. If
Machiavelli's advice was followed, a ruler could almost
guarantee success. But perhaps the first politician in the
modern world to follow the advice of The Prince, was a
man by the name of Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck.
Otto von Bismarck was born on April 1st 1815, in
Schonhausen, Northwest of Berlin in the district of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bismarck determined that this

cause should be a war, (Richards, 1977, 142) for there is
no better bonding agent then that of the threat to one's
livelihood. Bismarck used the Danish war to help
consolidate his internal position in Prussia and to strengthen
Prussian military transportation. (Christopher, 1991, p.103)
"Liberal sentiment in Germany had always been stirred by a
desire to separate Schleswig– Holstein from Denmark. The
liberals called for a repudiation of international agreements
by Prussia (such as the 1852 Protocol which put the
Danish issue on ice), while Bismarck declared in the Diet
that he would not be a party to a breach of international
obligations. So Bismarck made an agreement with Austria,
the avowed enemy of German unity, to proceed within the
context of the 1852 Protocol. The two powers then sent an
ultimatum to Denmark on January 16,1864 demanding a
withdrawal of the constitution of November 18 (which
incorporated Schleswig in Denmark) within 48 hours or
face military action. Denmark, counting on the support of

European Powers, rejected the ultimatum. France hesitated
to join England, which refused to act alone. So the powers
did nothing. An attempt at mediation also failed. Denmark
was therefore reduced to submission by Prussian and
Austrian military force. In the Treaty of Gastien (August
1865) Prussia and Austria decided to dispose of the
acquired

Comparing Napoleon's Approaches To The Unification Of...
Napoleon's authoritarian rule in the 1850s provided a new model in politics to the old ruling class in Europe. To what degree might the growing urban
middle classes and emerging working class rally for a strong and crucial conservative national state was one of the great political question and the
answer to that question came with the national unification of Italy and Germany.
Primarily there were three approaches to the unification of Italy. First, Mazzini centralized the democratic republic based on the universal right and the
will of the people. Second, Gioberti's a catholic priest headed the federation of existing states, and third, Italian nations were built around the aristocratic
kingdom of Sardinia–Piedmont as german looked towards

A Comparison Of Napoleon Bonaparte I And Napoleon I
During the nineteenth century, European countries had constantly changing borders between the Napoleonic wars and the unification of Germany and
Italy. Two of the military masterminds behind wars that shifted borders were Napoleon Bonaparte I (Napoleon) and Helmuth von Moltke the Elder.
Napoleon Bonaparte was a French soldier from Corsica that worked his way up the rankings in the French army during the French Revolution that
ended up becoming the commander of the whole French arm forces. He leveraged this leadership of the military to become the consulate of France
and then emperor of France in 1804. Furthermore, he hungered for nothing more then victory and he at first caught the rest of Europe off guard and a
lot of continental Europe in what would be known as the Napoleonic Wars. Nevertheless, his reign over most of Europe was short lived and his
campaign faltered when he tried to have a land war against Russia. The rest of Europe saw it as an opportunity and they defeated Napoleon.
Napoleon's victories only lead to more bloodshed. He was then exiled to Elba. He tried to make a return but was famously defeated at Waterloo, and
was exiled again and died in exile. In addition, Otto von Bismarck was the foreign affairs mastermind behind German unification, but the military
mastermind was Moltke. Moltke was a Danish born soldier in the Prussian army. During his younger years as a career soldier he struggled to make
money, so he was a freelance writer on the side.

Why Did Prussia Was Important In The Unification Of Germany
Prussia played a large and important role in the unification of Germany. Without Prussia pushing unification along, Germany as we know it today
would not exist. The Germanic states would not have unified as they did and the resulting wars that came about never would have played out. World
history, not just European history, would be far different without modern day Germany, and the state that led to its emergence; however,Prussia did not
unify Germany overnight. Prussia worked up to unification with a series of wars and interactions throughout their history. Prussia was formed as a
result of a series of crusades sanctioned by Pope Gregory IX against the pagan inhabitants of the area. The group of knights that undertook the crusade
formed the Teutonic Order. TheKingdom of Prussia was officially erected in 1701 by the order. The area that the knights had originally inhabited to
convert the indigenous peoples of the area was now an official political power. Prussia was located largely in the Northern hemisphere and was
surrounded by Russia, Hungary, France, Belgium, and the Netherlands. It was one of the largest German states and held most of the power within the
Germanic area, where it competed mostly with Austria for power. (((((((((((((achievements)))))))))))))))) (((((((((((((((downfalls))))))))))))))))) The
leading drive in Prussia for unification was a man named Otto Von Bismarck. Otto Von Bismarck was a master strategist that initiated a series of

Maria Theresa
Maria Theresa, the daughter of Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI, was the last ruler of the House of Habsburg. Prior to Theresa's birth, in 1700
Holy Roman Emperor Leopold I and Archdukes Joseph and Charles of Austria signed the Mutual Pact of Succession, giving the eldest son's
daughters a higher position in the line of succession. After Emperor Leopold I and Joseph I died, Archduke Charles of Austria ascended the throne. As
the last male heir of the Habsburg Empire, Charles VI issued the Pragmatic Sanction of 1713. With this, Charles VI's nieces were placed behind his
daughters in the line of succession. Though Prince Eugene of Savoy, Charles VI's advisor, urged against the sanction, in favor of expanding the
Austrian military and treasury, Charles VI secured the sanction, leaving Austria bankrupted. As the heir of the bankrupt state, Maria Theresa would
face great losses in the War of the Austrian Succession and Seven Years' War as a result of Austria's impoverished state.
Theresa ascended the throne as Archduchess of Austria and Queen of Hungary in 1740 following... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As Austrian troops forced French forces out of Bohemia, Theresa declared herself Queen of Bohemia in May 1743. With this, Austrian forces
advanced on the Rhine frontier, and in August 1744Prussian forces destroyed Prague. The following year, Charles VII died in January 1745. Upon
Charles VII's death, Duke Francis Stephen was elected Holy Roman Emperor and Theresa became Holy Roman Empress in September 1745. As Holy
Roman Empress, Theresa was forced to relinquish Silesia to Prussia as the Treaty of Breslau was signed in December 1745. Conflict continued
throughout Italy and the Netherlands for the following three years. Finally, with the Treat of Aix–La–Chapelle, the War of the Austrian Succession
ended, leaving Silesia under Prussian and relinquishing the Duchy of Parma to

Franco-Prussian War Research Paper
Prussia's Instigation of the Franco–Prussian War The Franco–Prussian War was fought between France and Prussia from 1870 into 1871. The
circumstances leading into the war were contentious with Prince Leopold receiving candidacy for the Spanish throne, but did not present a situation in
which war was imminent. Hostilities between the two nations were minimal until July of 1870 when a series of events prompted the war to commence
on the 19th when France declared war on Prussia. What or who provided this catalytic evolution of tensions between France and Prussia? Two
significant political leaders lead France headlong into the Franco–Prussian war, Antoine–AgГ©nor–Alfred the Duke of Gramont and Otto Eduard
Leopold von Bismarck Prussia's chief minister. Following Queen Isabella II departure into exile in 1868, the Spanish crown was vacant and the
Prussian Prince Leopold was named as a candidate successor ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Garmont addressed the French Parliament on 7 July 1870, warning them that the confirmation of Prince Leopold would "upset to our disadvantage, the
present balance of power in Europe and place in jeopardy the interests and the honor of France". (Gramont, Speech to the French Parliament) Garmont
also pressed the French Ambassador to Prussia, Count Vincent Benedetti, to "demand that the king forbid the prince to persist in the candidacy".
(Gramont, Letter to Benedetti at Ems) As a result of this demand, the Prussian King produced a telegraph with the intention to explain the situation to
his staff. Otto von Bismarck received the message, adulterer the content producing an aggressive rebuttal as opposed to the seemingly neutral original.
In response to this insult, the French declared war within the week as a direct result of Prussian political

How Was Frederick William Successful
Frederick William the Great Elector of Brandenburg–Prussia is the most absolute monarch. Frederick William's achievements/successes make other
monarchs such as Elizabeth Tudor seem weak and powerless. Therefore, it gave him the name as the Great Elector. With increasing the power and
importance by expanding the military and encouraging religious toleration, he still had an abundance of successes. After his reign from 1640 – 1688,
his son carried on his succession. When Frederick first inherited his father's successions, he found Prussia. Because he wanted a large, strong army,
Prussia became the prefect source. It was small with open–territory and no frontiers to defend. The army had 30,000 men by 1688 with its peak of
40,000 men.

The Unification of Germany Essay
The Unification of Germany
Bismarck
Otto von Bismarck achieved the unification of the disjointed German states through the skillful understanding of realpolitikand the Machiavellian use
of war as a political tool to eliminate Germany's rival nations, gain the support of the German people and gain territory. This ultimately created a
German legacy of strong militaristic tendencies, scheming national relations, and economic clout challenging the European heavyweights like England
and France. Bismarck's plan for unification began with his instigation of war with the small German states of Schleswig and Holstein over an
insignificant dispute concerning the governing of the states. Bismarck's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Using the tools of "realpolitik," Bismarck negotiated a settlement of uneasy peace with the division, which would help to provoke the next war in his
course towards unification. Bismarck had also expanded the influence of the German Confederation with this move as well as gained an important
access to the sea. This was the first instance of Prussia asserting itself internationally, and it wouldn't be the last before unification was complete. To
get the support of his king, Bismarck appealed to his militaristic side, as the king originally was disinclined to start a war, but after appealing to his
militaristic and nationalistic sentiments, Bismarck effectively convinced his king to go to war.
Conducting the war in Schleswig–Holstein was a simple task for Prussia, but the aftermath was more involved. With the two states defeated, Bismarck
fought to see them divided between Prussia and Austria ensuring tensions between the two. The final arrangement was as abrasive as possible, and the
Seven Weeks War, between Prussia and Austria soon followed because of this outcome. Bismarck entered this war with a unique goal for its
conclusion as his main goal was not to instigate a conflict to defeat an enemy, but to merely assert the sovereignty of the German states. He kept this
goal in mind when conducting the war, and he avoided creating a humiliating defeat

Rise of Prussia Essay example
Question:
Analyze the military, political, and social factors that account for the rise of Prussia between 1640 and 1786.
Bree Stanbrough
Due: March 3, 2011
Period 4
The rise of Prussia from 1640 to 1715 was mainly due to the great leadership of Frederick William 'the Elector', Frederick William I and Frederick the
Great of Prussia. Many military, social, and political factors led to the rise of Prussia also. The major factor that helped Prussia become a great
power was the growth of Prussia's new army and the territory they took because of this powerful military. Most of the military factors that led to the
rise of Prussia came from Fredrick William 'The Elector'. He was the first leader in Prussia to create and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many of the social factors that led to the rise of Prussia were made by Fredrick the Great. Some even called him 'The Social Reformer'. He made
life for Prussians easier by abolishing torture and corporal punishment.[7] He established religious tolerance and freedom of speech by ending
censorship.[8] Fredrick resettled immigrants from Austria to establish weaving as a major Prussian industry.[9] He proved himself as an
enlightened ruler who reformed Prussia's agriculture, legal system, industry and government for the better.[10] He added a diversity of skills to his
country by integrating religions into his countries everyday life such as, Jewish teachers, or Jesuit merchants and bankers.[11] He also purposely
set reasonable prices on grain so farmers and townspeople wouldn't go hungry.[12] Frederick William I also helped socially unite Prussia by created
a strong centralized bureaucracy. This allowed commoners to rise to top positions in the civil government. So now power rested with the hard
working, not with the men who were born rich or with land. With this change, there was no longer Parliamentary Estates. This socially reformed
Prussia set the foundation for a powerful Prussian empire. Prussian leaders wanted to establish royal absolutism.[13] Most of the political reform was
a change in who was in political positions of power. Frederick William and Frederick

Nationalism and War Essay
Nationalism and War
Does nationalism have a relationship with the causes of the wars between 1792 and 1914? This can be disputed through the events of the French
Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars, the unification struggles of Germany and Italy in the late 1800's, the Alliance systems of the late 1800's and the
assassination of the Austrian archduke before the outbreak of World War 1.
During the French Revolution in 1792, an effort was made to remove Austrian presence from French lands. This came about in part because King
Louis XVI wanted to seek help from the Austrians to remove the reformers, persuading France to declare war on Austria. The Jacobins were afraid that
this war would have an irreversible effect on the Revolution. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many of the wars during this time led to nationalistic feelings in the countries that Napoleon had conquered. This became visible in the resistance of
the Spanish and Prussians after Napoleon conquered them. Spain revolted because Napoleon took away the privileges of the nobles and made his
brother, who the Spanish considered a foreigner, king. Similarly, during the War of Liberation, patriotic and nationalistic principles ledPrussia to revolt
against the French invasion. With great patriotism and nationalism, Prussia defeated France in1813. The Napoleonic Wars were not wars of nationalism,
but were of one man's dream of being a conqueror.
At another time in history, Bismarck was instrumental in the unification of Germany. It was his thirst for expansion and Prussian rule throughout
Germany that drove him. It was during the unification of the southern states that nationalism played an essential role. With the help of Austria,
Bismarck's first strike was at Denmark in 1864. Austria only joined in the hope that Schleswig and Holstein would not become part of Prussia. This
was a catalyst for the Austro–Prussian war in 1866 that resulted in the defeat of Austria. In agreement, Prussia assumed territorial control over
Schleswig and Holstein and other German states. Consequently, this led to the unification of the northern states, leaving Austria out of Prussian affairs

Prussia 's Influence On The World 's Foundational...
Prussia was a kingdom that existed nearly half a millennium ago as a patchwork of territorial fragments, with no significant resources founded yet or a
coherent culture. With its capital in Berlin, "Prussia grew from being a small, poor, disregarded medieval state into one of the most vigorous and
powerful nations in Europe."1 Prussia 's involvement in the continent 's foundational religious and political conflagrations. From the devastations of the
Thirty Years War through centuries of political machinations to the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire. From the enlightenment of Frederick the
Great to the destructive conquests of Napoleon. Then from the "Iron and Blood" policies of Bismarck to the creation of the German Empire in 1871, and
all that implied for the tumultuous twentieth century.
Prussia's government was monarchical from the 1700s all the way to the Great War. During all that time it increasingly valued a strong, formidable
army, but was not so formidable when it met Napoleon during the Coalition Wars. It put forth effort in training and spending much of its money
towards weapons and uniforms. The military technology and strategy of Prussia during 1860s and 1870s was outstanding. Especially with the mind of
Otto von Bismarck (1815–1898) leading the way against Denmark, and later Austria, and then with his sneaky tactics he used against France before the
Franco–Prussian war in 1870.
Prior to the unification in 1871, Germany was made up of thirty–nine

The Balance of Power and the Congress of Vienna
The Congress of Vienna (1814–1815) No event epitomizes the state of Europe in the wake of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars as well
as the Congress of Vienna held between 1814–1815. The culmination of centuries of European political tradition, the Congress was in many ways the
last gasp of monarchy in Europe, as the royal houses tried to restore the Europe they once knew and ensure that their way of politics and society
would be sustained even in the face of the radical wave of change foreshadowed by the French Revolution. At that time of the Congress Europe was in
a state of disarray. The French Revolution that erupted in 1792, Napoleon Bonaparte's rise to power and the subsequent wars had not only proven ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Once in full swing, the Congress quickly moved into its first phase, the negotiations over Napoleon's Duchy of Warsaw, otherwise known as Poland.
The Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth had been partitioned between 1772 to 1795 amongst Hapsburg Austria, Prussia, and Russia. Alexander I,
demanding compensation for Russia's efforts against Napoleon pushed for a plan in which the Prussian and Austrian controlled sections of Poland
would be combined into a new Kingdom of Poland under Russian control. In exchange for ceding their Polish territories, Prussia would be given the
entire kingdom of Saxony, and Austria would be compensated with extensive holdings in northern Italy. (Gulick) This proposition led to the bitterest
conflicts at the Congress in what was dubbed the Polish–Saxon Crisis. The Coalition quickly broke into two opposing camps with Great Britain and
Austria in opposition to the Russian proposition, and Russia and Prussia in support of it. Metternich's reasons for opposing Russian hegemony over
Poland were the most pressing. Russian control of Poland meant that the Hapsburg Empire would have to share its north and northeastern borders with
Russian soldiery. Likewise, if Prussia were to come into possession of Saxony then the northern perimeter of the Empire would be even more
susceptible to invasion, and the already strong political bond

The Balance Of Power
11. What is 'balance of power'? The balance of power was a concept or idea in the eighteenth century. By the eighteenth century, the European method
of self governing independent states was established greatly in the idea of self–interest. Since international connections were based on deliberation of
power, the eighteenth century concept of a "balance of power" was grounded on how to counterbalance the power of one state by another one to stop
anyone's power from controlling over the others. However, this balance of power did not indicate a wish for peace. Huge armies were created to
protect a state's security were sometimes even used for offensive motives as well. 12. Who were Austria's alliance and enemies during the War of
Austrian Succession?

The Causes Of The Franco-German War
The Franco–Prussian or Franco–German war was a series of battles fought during the years 1870–1871. It was a war that was mostly spurred on by the
political unrest between Emperor Napoleon the Third of France and King Wilhelm the First of Prussia and Germany. Though the war between these
two countries was relatively short the repercussions would ring out for years to follow. What were the events of the Franco–Prussian war.
It widely believed that both countries had their own motives for war. For France it was a matter of not wanting an upset in the balance of power
which already waned out of their favor and fear of the growing power of Prussia. The Prussian government motive for stirring unrest in the people and
provoking war was to bring about a unified country to face the French threat . "I did not doubt that a Franco–German war must take place before the
construction of a United Germany could be realised."(Chancellor von Bismarck) However the match to start this fire would be the candidacy of Prince
Leopold Hohenzollern for the Spanish throne.
As a member of King Wilhelm's family should Prince Leopold rise to be king of Spain it would mean the France would be surrounded by a
Spanish–Prussia alliance. This fact spurred the French government to send an ambassador Count Vincent Benedetti to conference with King Wilhelm.
Count Benedetti positioned to have King Wilhelm rescind the prince's candidacies which was meant but when asked to insure that no member of his

German Unification: Franco Prussian War, And The Congress...
German unification had not been an easy process. According to Professor Jason Ross Rozulmalski, German unification had been attempted time after
time, without any success. However, as the events began to unveil, such as (according to Professor Jason Ross Rozulmalski) the Constitutional Conflict
in Prussia, Rise of Bismarck, the Schleswig–Holstein, Austro Prussian War, etc., two events stood out the most: the Franco Prussian War, and the
Congress of Vienna. These two events have one common thread among them; they involved France. France had a massive role in German Unification.
Originally, there was a weak economic league of 39 German states that strictly had German speaking citizens, and although there was an ethnic, and to a
point economic

In 1862 Bismarck Said, 'the Great Question of the Day Will...
In 1862 Bismarck said, 'The great question of the day will not be settled by speeches and majority decisions...'
What were 'the great questions of the day' for Bismarck, and how did he settle them up to 1871?
The significance of Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck–SchГ¶nhausen for world history is indisputable. Bismarck, a German Junker who was born on
April 1st 1815 and died on July 30st 1898, is often referred to as the first modern politician of world history and it is very important to know what
kind of man he was to understand his motives and what his 'great questions of the day' were.
While his father was from an old noble family his mother was only from a common one with no special background and history. She always told him
that he ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Austria had a similar idea and so the two big German powers Austria and Prussia worked together for the last time before the unification.
The crisis led finally into war between Prussia and Denmark in 1864. But not the King in Prussia or some high status generals were making decisions
about the troop movement and the war tactics but Bismarck.
Prussia won the war together with Austria. The German confederation decided not to give Prussia control over Schleswig–Holstein but both Austria
and Prussia.
Bismarck's aim was not reached but some of his political enemies changed their view on Bismarck and he was better respected, also by the liberals.
However, the second war was the one between Austria and Germany. They had just been allies in the war before but when Bismarck noticed that
Austria was blocking the development of Prussian power he realized that if he wanted a German Reich under Prussian control then he needed to break
through this blockade. He tried ally with the liberals and nationalists to make his own position stronger and to form a Kleindeutschland.
This was one option of two; Kleindeutschland was Germany united without Austria and GroГџdeutschland was all German states united. Bismark did
not consider GroГџdeutschland as realizable. He was not planning a war; First his aims were just to get Schleswig–Holstein under the control of
Prussia. As a temporal solution Schleswig–Holstein was divided and

What Was The Impact Of Nationalism In Germany Between 1815...
Nationalism was a result of a myriad of contributing factors which had a plethora of significant impacts on Germany during the years 1815 and 1871.
Nationalism is an ideology based on the sense of loyalty and devotion one has to their nation and the beliefs that those who share a common language,
history, and culture should constitute an independent nation free of foreign domination. The first, and perhaps most significant, effect that nationalism
had upon Germany was that it led to German unification in 1871. Another impact that nationalism had in Germany was that it allowed Germans to
develop a sense of national identity. Nationalism also played a huge role in enabling Germany to become a dominant power within Europe. Therefore,
nationalism ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many attempts to unify the separate German–speaking countries were made prior to its official unification, however, they were all ultimately
unsuccessful. This was due to the fact that although the people were Germanic, they had little sense of a national identity. Nationalism was a driving
force behind the development of a national consciousness as it assisted people in realising that they were all German and, as a result, were all similar in
many ways. These commonalities encouraged the emergence of a distinct German identity. The biggest cultural factor was undoubtedly the German
language. Although there were different dialects used among the states, these variations emerged from the same source, hence, the German people had
shared a common language. All the states also shared customs and a common culture, which stemmed from similar tastes in literature and music. There
was an increase in German literature, from the works of Goethe and Schiller, that recognised common German characteristics and an interest in folklore
also emerged at the time, as a result of the works of The Brothers Grimm, who presented these tales as German in origin and changed details that
suggested different origins. What became the German national anthem was a poem that read "Deutschland Гјber alles / Гњber alles in der Welt", which
translates to "Germany above all else / Above all else in the world". The task of creating the German nation state was one that required and generated a
significant amount of hope in the citizens of Germany, who were able to transcend territories, borders and different cultural

Describe The Relationship Between Samsov And Gumbinnenkampf
On August 26, 1914, the German 8th Army, under the leadership of Paul von Hindenburg and Erich Ludendorff, strikes with lethal force against the
advancing Russian 2nd Army, led by General Aleksandr Samsonov, in East Prussia during the opening weeks of the First World War.
In the middle of August 1914, much sooner than had been anticipated, Russia sent two armies into East Prussia, while Germany, according to its war
strategy, had the bulk of its forces concentrated to the west, against France. The Russian 1st Army, under General Pavel Rennenkampf, advanced to the
northeastern corner of East Prussia, while Samsonov's 2nd Army made headway into the southwest, planning to join with Rennenkampf's men and pin
the outnumbered German 8th Army between them. After a Russian victory in the Battle of Gumbinnen on... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Though Ludendorff succumbed to nerves initially, delaying the start of the German attack by one day, Hindenburg was able to calm his
subordinate–not for the last time in what would become a fabled partnership. On August 26, after intercepting uuencoded wireless messages from both
Samsonov and Rennenkampf, the Germans were able to take Samsonov's army by surprise with the force of their attack near the village of Tannenberg,
to the southwest of the Masurian Lakes. The delay in starting the attack had given Samsonov's forces more time to advance deeper into the sack formed
by the German divisions enveloping them from both sides, the strength of which Samsonov consistently underestimated. After three days of battering
by German artillery, Samsonov's troops began their retreat; more German forces cut off their path and a massive slaughter ensued. In the first hours of
August 30, confronting the reality of his army's collapse, Samsonov went into the forest, away from his staff, and shot

What Was The Immediate Effects Of The 1848 Revolution In...
Throughout history there has always been revolutions, change, and reforms. In 1832, England experienced the death of George IV and accession of
William IV in 1830 ,that resulted in a general parliamentary election in which the opposition political party, the Whigs, scored major gains with their
platform calling for parliamentary reform. With the Tory party divided, the king asked the leader of the Whigs, Earl Grey, to form a government.
Immediately, the Whigs introduced a major reform bill designed to increase the number of voters by 50 percent and to eliminate underpopulated
electoral districts ("rotten boroughs") and replace them with representatives for previously unrepresented manufacturing districts and cities, especially
in the industrial... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Austrian Empire was vulnerable to revolutionary challenge. The new Austrian Empire was a collection of subject nationalities (more non–Germans
than Germans) stirred by acute nationalism, its government was reactionary, meaning liberal institutions were nonexistent, and its reliance on
serfdom doomed the mass of people to misery. As soon as the news of of the February days in France reached the borders of the empire, rebellions
began. In document 6, it shows a Presentation of a Bill by a Hungarian Diet to Emperor Ferdinand I of Austria. This document describes the revolt
against freedom and independence that was granted to them. It also shares how the military risked their lives to suppress a rebellion. Most of the
citizens are revolting and not compromising to their rules, and that then caused violence such as, villages that are burned down and massacres
occurring. The main purpose of this document is to show how the people can become violent if pushed enough. People in this time turned to violence,
because they wanted a change and still wasn't granted their freedoms. In document 7, Louis Kossuth discusses his "Address to the People of United
States, March 1850". It shows how abominable the government can be towards the people. He informs people that the government is plotting against
them, and that they are going to have to defend themselves. The complete purpose of this document is inform and protect each

Enlightened Despotism in Prussia
Assignment: 1
Critically examine the main features of Enlightened Despotism in 18th century Prussia.
The Enlightenment refers to an important cultural and intellectual movement of the 18th century, whose goal was to establish knowledge based on an
enlightened rationality. Enlightened Absolutism or Enlightened Despotism as it is more often called can be defined as a form of government strongly
influenced by the wide propagation of ideas and the political philosophy of the Enlightenment. It is a term first used by the Philosophes in the second
half of the 18th century that manifested to describe a particular phase in the development of absolutism. The term 'Enlightened Despot' refers to those
18th century monarchs who were familiar with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Christian Wolff was the first to introduce the ideas of the Enlightenment into German administrative theory. His ideas derive from the Enlightenment.
According to Wolff, the state was a voluntary contract between individuals and the main purpose of the state was to further welfare and security. At the
same time, since the state has the duty to plan and implement measures for security and welfare, it has the right to insist that its citizens obey its orders.
It is emphasized that they are bound to do willingly whatever the authorities deem to be right. These ideas were expounded and elaborated, without
adding anything new, by the German political theorists of the 18th century and particularly by the followers of Wolff.
In practice, Enlightened Absolutism was certainly not so radical. The Physiocrats never got beyond the initial stages in the implementation of their
doctrines. Thus the French doctrine of Despotisme Г©claire remains an interesting trend of thought, but its practical effect was almost nil. The direct
influence of the German 18th century administrative theory was not much as well.
Frederick II of Prussia is often regarded as the first true enlightened despot. He was the first monarch who declared 'the sovereign is the first servant of
the state' and presented Europe with a model of progressive monarchy. Frederick cultivated friendship with several Philosophes and believed that inputs
from them could be used to make the administration of

The Enigma Of Nationalism By Yael Tamir
Nationalism has become one of the most powerful uniting–and occasionally separating–powers of the modern age. Throughout history, there were
numerous countries that exemplified both sides of this classic European belief. However, as time has passed, this pride and promotion of one's
country has developed far beyond the scope of Europe. Nationalist feelings fester in all parts of the globe now, and with that comes more complicated
expressions of the sentiment, as well as carefully crafted governments that exist for the sole support of nationalist fervor.
According to Yael Tamir, author of The Enigma of Nationalism, "a nation.., may be defined as a community whose members share feelings of
fraternity, substantial distinctiveness, and exclusivity, as well as beliefs in a common ancestry and a continuous genealogy" (4). During this period,
many classic liberals used this idea of a nation to support change throughout all of Europe. By insisting that nations come together, they achieved huge
social upheaval and reform, of which the aristocracy and conservatives were completely against. However, the use of this unifying force had its
consequences. For example, the creation of the first Prussian constitution at a National Assembly in 1848 granted a larger, unifiedPrussia (the German
empire) built on a somewhat democratic model. However, along with the democracy came the development of a three–class system. This ensured that
the Junkers, the wealthiest men who paid the most taxes,

Wilhelm II Research Paper
Wilhelm II was born into royalty on the 27th of January 1859, at the Crown Prince's Palace in Berlin to Prince Frederick William of Prussia who
would later become the future Frederick III and his wife Victoria, who is the oldest daughter of Britain's Queen Victoria. at the moment he was born,
his great–uncle Frederick William IV was the king of Prussia. He was the first grandchild of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert of England, and is also
the first son of the Crown Prince of Prussia, Wilhelm was from 186, second in the line of succession to Prussia, and, after 1871, to the new German
Empire, which then according to the constitution of the German Empire, was ruled by the King of Prussia.
A birth defect left him with a withered left arm due to the disease Erb's palsy, which he then tried with some success to conceal. Photos show him
with a pair of white gloves in his left hand to make the withered arm seem longer. In others, he holds his left hand with his right or has his withered
arm on the bottom of a sword. In others, he is seen holding a cane to give the image of a useful limb posed at a dignified angle. His left arm was about
6 inches shorter than his right arm. Historians have mentioned that the disability affected his emotional development. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Wilhelm attended the wedding in a Highland costume, complete with a small toy sword. During the ceremony the four–year–old got bored. His
eighteen–year–old uncle Alfred, the Duke of Edinburgh, was charged with keeping an eye on him, told him to be quiet, but Wilhelm drew his sword
and threatened Alfred. When Alfred attempted to shut him up by force, Wilhelm bit him on the leg. His grandmother, Queen Victoria, missed seeing
the disturbance, to her, Wilhelm remained "a clever, dear, good little child, the great favorite of my beloved Vicky" Vicky was his

Essay about Machiavellian Poltician
Throughout history men have been struggling to become the
strongest or most dominant force in society. Scores of men,
throughout history, have taken notice that it is easier to
control several smaller states as opposed to one unified
state. In the late 15th and early 16th centuries a man by the
name of Nicolo Machiavelli reflected the actions of famous
men and their assent to power in his book The Prince. If
Machiavelli's advice was followed, a ruler could almost
guarantee success. But perhaps the first politician in the
modern world to follow the advice of The Prince, was a
man by the name of Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck.
Otto von Bismarck was born on April 1st 1815, in
Schonhausen, Northwest of Berlin in the district of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He proceeded to

collect the additional taxes on the basis of the 1861 budget,
arguing that because the constitution did not provide for the
case of an impasse he would have to apply the questions of
the day [meaning the unification of Germany] will not be
settled by speeches and majority decisions... but by blood
and iron." (Versaware, 1999, p.1) Bismarck was making
his intentions known to all, and it was fairly clear that he
would use any means necessary to achieve his purpose,
even if that meant armed conflict. Machiavelli, on the
subject of war, stated in The Prince that "A prince ought to
have no other aim or thought, nor select anything else for
his study, than war and its rules and discipline; for this is the
sole art that belongs to him who rules, and it is of such
force that it not only upholds those who are born princes,
but it often enables men to rise from a private station to that
rank. And, on the contrary, it is seen that when princes
have thought more of ease than of arms they have lost their
states. And the first cause of your losing it is to neglect this

and; and what enables you to acquired a state is to master
of the art." ( Machiavelli, 1505, Ch. 14 p.1) Bismarck
understood this very well and that is why he said "The
questions of the day [meaning the unification of Germany]
will not be settled by speeches and majority decisions... but
by

Otto Von Bismark: The Rise Of The Unification Of Germany
A unified German nation was the single most significant political development in Europe between 1848 and 1914. Germany was split between the
liberal parliament and conservative ideas of opposing Prussian Prime Minister. For years, the conservatives and the liberals would battle each other in
the government and prevent the unification of Germany as one state. This impasse started to end when Prussian Monarch William I appointed Otto
Von Bismark to be his Prime Minister. Prussian Monarch William I regarded the Prussian military as his first concern. His war minister and chief of
staff proposed an idea to increase the size of the army. However, liberal opposition in the parliament blocked such proposals from succeeding. In the
September of 1862, William I turned to Otto Von Bismark for help. Otto Von Bismark was elected as the Prime Minister and began to move against the
liberal parliament. He contended that the Prussian constitution permitted the government to function by previously granted taxes. With this, taxes could
be collected and spent on whatever was necessary. The Prussian army and most of the bureaucracy supported this interpretation of the constitution.
However, the 1863 elections sustained the liberal majority in parliament, and they opposed such views. Bismark needed to find a new way to attract
supporters away ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bismark now awaited an opportunity to complete the unification of Germany by bringing the Southern states unto the Northern Confederation. An
opportunity arose in 1870 when complex diplomatic negotiations took place to discuss the possibility of a cousin of William I becoming the new
King of Spain. The French opposed this and Bismark set out a plan. His plan was to edit the press dispatch to say that the Prussian monarch William I
insulted the French ambassador, even though this was false. After that had occurred, France declared war onPrussia on July

Enlightment for Fredrick the Great of Prussia and Joseph...
Frederick the Great of Prussia and Joseph II of Austria adopted the newfound ideas of the Enlightenment to different extents with Frederick the Great
advancing the ideas by implementing religious toleration, freedom of speech and press, and setting a single code of laws for all of his subjects and
not advancing them by not abolishing serfdom for fear of upsetting the "Junkers", or Prussian nobility; Joseph II advanced the ideas of the
Enlightenment eagerly by completely abolishing serfdom paying no heed to what it could cause socially and politically and he didn't advance these
ideas in the end because his many reforms caused alienation of the church and nobility and radical changes in social hierarchy.
Frederick the Great of Prussia ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Most of these reforms though were to please the querulous nobility and prevent them from trying to interfere with the government and upset social
balance. Frederick the Great set limitations whilst accepting Enlightenment ideas when it interfered with the good of his subjects, economy and his
beloved military. All of these three topics depended on the Prussian nobility, or the "Junkers" who owned large amounts of land had many serfs to
farm it. Many of these Junkers also held important military ranks in the army. Frederick the Great could have chosen to abolish serfdom but did not
for this would greatly anger the Junkers, the backbone of the Prussian state and military. It was said that Prussia was not a country with an army: it
was an army with a country. In Frederick's military, he did not abolish torture to help install discipline and honesty in his soldiers. Keeping this helped
his army become the fourth strongest army in Europe.
Joseph II of Austria strictly believed that reason was the best and only path to take and so accepted nearly all of the new Enlightenment ideas on his
traditionally run empire causing major issues. One

Otto Von Bismarck: 19th Century Germany
Chancellor, politician, and strategist, Otto Von Bismarck was truly a renaissance man of 19th century Europe, employing his own policy of Realpolitik
across Prussia and into all Germanic states, expanding his confederation into an unrivaled superpower in Europe. Otto Von Bismarck (1815–1898)
oversaw the construction of Germany by unifying Prussia and smaller Germanic territories directly through bloody conflicts. In doing so, he focused on
foreign endeavors of annexation, absolute dominance, self–identification, and most importantly, stability and peace. Given his foundational
contributions, Otto Von Bismarckis likely the most important player in unifying a fragmented Germany and transforming it to the most revered nation
in 19th century

The Franco-Prussian War Essay
The Franco–Prussian War
During the first half of the nineteenth century, Germany was made up of more than 30 small states, the largest and most dominant of which was
Prussia. Prussia had decided that all of the states should all be united to create a bigger and better country, Germany. By the end of 1870 it had forced
all of the German states to accept its authority and create the German Empire with the King of Prussia at its head (the Hohenzollen's). Everything was
going to plan as Chancellor Prince Otto Von Bismarck(person who was behind the unification of Germany) had anticipated apart from the four large
states in southern Germany who remained independent. Bismarck now needed a way to unite ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But this wasn't enough for the French government so they took the matter further, and the French Ambassador was to see Wilhelm making sure that
Leopold had given up all claims to the Spanish throne. Wilhelm sent a telegram to Bismarck asking him to deal with the matter. On July 13th 1870
Bismarck published an amended version of the telegram, famously known as the "Em's Telegram". This suggested that Wilhelm had deliberately
insulted the French Ambassador, and the French were so outraged by this that on July 19th 1870 they declared war on Prussia just as Bismarck had
planned.
For France the war was a disaster. 200,000 French troops found themselves facing 380,000 Prussian troops who were more experienced, had better
leadership and organization skills, and the Prussian Mauser rifle was far better than the French Chassepot. Unfortunately 180,000 French troops were
surrounded in the Fortress of Metz and the French force that had been sent to help were too surrounded at Sudan and surrendered. To make matters
worse Napoleon III had also been taken prisoner, and in Paris and independent republic was set up, and the city fought on for one year until January
1871, but it was a lost battle.
As compensation for Prussia, Prussia wrote up the treaty of Frankfurt, in which France had to give Alsace and Lorraine in the North–Eastern

The Last Emperor Of Germany And King Of Prussia
Meray Aslan2/16/2017
The last emperor of Germany and king of Prussia still stirs up many different opinions is Kaiser II. He was a strong and effective leader through his
discipline, self–assurance and nationalism, whose sole passion is to make their country the best it could be. Kaiser Wilhelm II was born on January 27,
1859 to Prince Frederick of Prussia and princess Victoria of the United Kingdom. Prince Fredrick then fell ill and died after just 99 days of his reign
and Wilhelm II took the throne at just the age of 29. Throughout his reign, Wilhelm II had a clear vision of the way he would like to run his country
and his personality made him more than capable to achieve his goals. He was very well educated and passionately ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is explained when "The Emperor, who himself sees to everything, has so much to do in reading all these documents that if he wishes to examine
each in detail–––which with him is a principle–––he cannot allow himself an instant 's rest."(Leudet). This is a very important aspect of his
personality to analyze as a leader because through his actions and values, he clearly puts his country first before himself. His persistence to be In
control of everything is something to be admired because he was even able to push Otto von Bismarck out who can be a very persuasive and
aggressive man who has been involved with the monarchy for a long time. This creates an image of the monarchy as a leader as caring and
considerate in the most graceful way which leads to respect. This attitude as a monarch, towards his image is something many leaders do not do.
Some monarchs have an entitled attitude and value their pompous image above all. While Wilhelm is approaching his image in a noble and modest
fashion where he is here to take care of the people and country even if it keeps him up all night. He believes in doing things and solving issue in the
moments and not wasting time (Leudet). This principle is very admirable and inspiring because it shows that as a good leader, he is there to guide the
people with his full effort. His detail, discipline and extremely hands on attitude made people believe in how important his role is for the country is and

The Between Russia And Brandenburg Prussia
"L'Г©tat, c'est moi." I am the state, as quoted by Louis XIV. This is a great example of the meaning of absolutism. The kingdoms of France, Russia
and Brandenburg–Prussia are ample evidence to prove that absolutism worked and was a commonality compared to constitutionalism. This issue then
falls to whether the differences or the similarities of these kingdoms are more important in European and World History. The following will provide an
argument to support that the similarities of the kingdoms should be more heavily stressed.
France was set up for absolute monarchy by King Henry IV. Henry's ambitions neutralized the clash between Catholics and Protestants, in theEdict of
Nantes. Before Henry's assassination, he had created a financial surplus in the kingdom. Next in line for the throne was Louis XIII, Henry's son, but he
was too young to rule, so Cardinal Richelieu had control over the kingdom. He limited the political privileges of the Huguenots and involved France in
the Thirty Years War, and by doing this he affirmed the royal power and engaged France more in European affairs.
After Richelieu's death, Louis XIII died and, his son, Louis XIV, who was five years old, inherited the throne. When Louis turned 23 he stepped
forward to claim the throne, believing that God had given him the position of King of France. The Sun King, as Louis was called, surrounded himself
with the nobles to keep them from governing their districts as effectively and thus empowering himself.

How Did The Confederation Lead To German Unification
After the Holy Roman Empire was dissolved by Napoleon, all of the German states were completely separate. They had nothing tying them together
until 1815. This is when the Congress of Vienna created the German Confederation, a group of 39 loosely joined German states. The Confederation
still had no central government, but delegates would meet once a month to discuss things like mutual laws and policies. The Confederation was mainly
a loose political organization who had common allies and enemies (Britannica). The states in the Confederation were still separate for the most part,
although this did not cause them problems. The Confederation worked for all of the states and they were all peaceful. In 1864 the process of
unification started... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because of these issues, the Seven Weeks war started between Austria andPrussia. Bismarck had already gotten Italian support and French neutrality
for Prussia. Prussia made the first move by occupying Holstein, but many German states, including Saxony, Hanover and Bavaria, took Austria's side.
They were suspicious of Prussian military. Despite having support, Austria was defeated at the Battle of Sadowa (Koniggratz). The Treaty of Prague
was created in August of that year and excluded Austria from all German affairs. Throughout the process of creating the Treaty, Bismarck made sure
that Austria didn't lose any land. After this, the German Confederation was dissolved and the North German Confederation was formed. The North
German Confederation consisted of all of the German states north of the Main river and it was controlled by Prussia. The southern states such as
Baden and Bavaria stayed independent, although they had military alliances with Prussia. A main problem that delayed further unification was France,
ruled by Napoleon III. The French held a growing idea that a Germany that was united and ruled by Prussia would create competition against France
for being the main power in Europe. In 1870,

Causes Of Bismarck Unification Germany

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Heidi Perry

More from Heidi Perry (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Causes Of Bismarck Unification Germany