Embed presentation
Download as PDF, PPTX




















![How can we measure
societal impact? UK REF
Wilsdon et al., 2015
“[…] for the impact component
of the REF, it is not currently
feasible to use quantitative
indicators in place of narrative
impact case studies, or the
impact template”](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/esss-societalimpact-160911094825/85/Societal-Impact-21-320.jpg)
![Altmetrics and the ‘broader’
impacts of science
Wilsdon et al., 2015
“[…] wider use of quantitative
indicators, and the emergence of
alternative metrics for societal
impact, could support the
transition to a more open,
accountable and outward-facing
research system”](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/esss-societalimpact-160911094825/85/Societal-Impact-22-320.jpg)

![Potential applications
of altmetrics
Multidimensional evaluation using biplot.
Research at the University of Granada
Source: Milanes-Guisado, Y. (2015). Multidimensional evaluation of research. Micro analysis
at the university of Granada during the period 2009-2013 [doctoral thesis]. Universidad de
Granada. Supervisors: Daniel Torres-Salinas, José Navarrete, Francisco Solis
Research questions:
• ¿What is the metric
profile of research
groups taking into
account bibliometric
and non-bibliometric
indicators?
Methodology:
• Time frame: 2009-2013
• Analysis unit:
161 research groups = 2216 res.
• Methods:
Correlations
biplot analysis](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/esss-societalimpact-160911094825/85/Societal-Impact-24-320.jpg)


























This document discusses measuring societal impact of research. It defines societal impact as social, environmental, cultural or economic benefits from academic activities. Measuring societal impact is challenging due to the attribution problem. The UK Research Excellence Framework assesses societal impact through impact case studies that describe impact in different areas. Altmetrics are proposed as a potential way to measure broader impacts, though they may better reflect scientific rather than societal impact. A case study using multidimensional analysis of research groups at the University of Granada found some groups with profiles oriented toward teaching dissemination, media impact, and knowledge transfer as indicators of societal impact.




















![How can we measure
societal impact? UK REF
Wilsdon et al., 2015
“[…] for the impact component
of the REF, it is not currently
feasible to use quantitative
indicators in place of narrative
impact case studies, or the
impact template”](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/esss-societalimpact-160911094825/85/Societal-Impact-21-320.jpg)
![Altmetrics and the ‘broader’
impacts of science
Wilsdon et al., 2015
“[…] wider use of quantitative
indicators, and the emergence of
alternative metrics for societal
impact, could support the
transition to a more open,
accountable and outward-facing
research system”](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/esss-societalimpact-160911094825/85/Societal-Impact-22-320.jpg)

![Potential applications
of altmetrics
Multidimensional evaluation using biplot.
Research at the University of Granada
Source: Milanes-Guisado, Y. (2015). Multidimensional evaluation of research. Micro analysis
at the university of Granada during the period 2009-2013 [doctoral thesis]. Universidad de
Granada. Supervisors: Daniel Torres-Salinas, José Navarrete, Francisco Solis
Research questions:
• ¿What is the metric
profile of research
groups taking into
account bibliometric
and non-bibliometric
indicators?
Methodology:
• Time frame: 2009-2013
• Analysis unit:
161 research groups = 2216 res.
• Methods:
Correlations
biplot analysis](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/esss-societalimpact-160911094825/85/Societal-Impact-24-320.jpg)
























