Human Reproductive Cloning Should Be Banned Essay

Human Reproductive Cloning Should be Banned Essay
Human Reproductive Cloning Should be Banned
The issues concerning human reproductive cloning are shrouded in controversy, perhaps overshadowing the true advantages of cloning technology.
Therapeutic cloning, which is often misunderstood as reproductive cloning, is less controversial than the latter as it does not involve the creating of an
individual being. Instead, vital stem cells are extracted from human embryos, in order to generate tissues and organs for transplant.
The goal of this process is strictly to harvest stem cells, resulting in the creation of "cloned organs", which can be used to treat heart disease,
Alzheimer's, and cancer.
However, because reproductive cloning involves the creation of a specific being with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
. . concerns can be addressed when reproductive cloning has been shown to be safe in animals, which it has not yet." (Paulson) The success rate by
means of reproductive cloning remains pale in comparison to natural procreation, and thus does not justify cloning as a form of procreation for the time
being. The current success rate for reproductive cloning stands at one or two viable offspring per 100 experiments, and until the success rate drastically
increases, cloning humans would be potentially dangerous and unethical.
The dangers that arise from reproductive cloning are numerous, and are enough to validate the banning of human reproductive cloning altogether.
During mammalian reproductive cloning, a large proportion of clones suffered from weakened immune systems, which greatly compromised the
animal's ability to fight off infection, disease, and other disorders. "Animal experiments in cloning all indicate that a cloned twin is at high risk of
congenital defects, multiple health problems and perhaps a greatly shortened life span." (Paulson) In addition, many of the offspring produced through
cloning suffer massive abnormalities, such as missing or deformed organs. Approximately 30% of offspring are diagnosed with "large offspring
syndrome" and other debilitating conditions. In fact, studies on reproductive cloning have shown that more than 90% of
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Pro Cloning Research Paper
Why should society allow clones to be made; how could they even benefit society? Cloning is the process of making an exact copy of a plant or
animal. Being able to clone organisms can benefit society and living organisms. Some people question cloning and have concerns over the ethics of it;
they wonder if we would be playing God by making clones. Cloning should be legal because of the beneficial opportunities it could present regarding to
health, animals, and agriculture. One of the reasons cloning should be legal is because of the health benefits of cloning. Cloning could eliminate
infertility in men and women. Human reproductive cloning could allow couples with infertility problems to have a child of their own. If the man is
the infertile one he can have his sperm cloned and use the fertile cloned sperm, and likewise if the woman is the infertile one she can have her eggs
cloned and use the fertile cloned eggs. By cloning human reproduction, some say the resulted child could be deprived of their uniqueness because
they are made in a lab. Regardless of where the child is made, it will still be the couple's child made from their own DNA just like every other child.
Cloning has many health benefits, such as helping infertile couples have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Cloning could prevent an animal from going extinct. When a species is endangered, scientists can make clones of them to prevent extinction. Some
point out that when cloning animals, the animals have more deformities at birth, and are more likely to die. Both cloned and non–cloned animals can
have deformities or die at birth regardless if they are cloned or not, and as time progresses scientists can experiment more and eradicate this problem all
together by researching and practicing cloning more. Cloning can benefit animals greatly, for example, scientists cloning animals to keep them from
becoming extinct, which is why cloning should be

The Cloning Should Not Be Banned By The Human Body
Cloning Dolly, the sheep in 1996 was a momentous moment in scientific history. Scientists removed the nucleus from one of Dolly 's skin cells and
engineered an egg to be insert with then nucleus. This egg could have fertilized in a mothers ' uterus. Following this discovery, mice, pigs and cattle
have been cloned based on the same concept. In 2012, a group of scientists took cloning a step further and cloned human embryos. With great certainty,
human cloning will be banned by the government due to human rights. The government has already deemed it illegal to fund human cloning projects.
Despite the human rights issue, cloning serves a great role in research. These cloned embryos will help understand the biological nature of human
cells and the human body. Also the embryos will help advance medical treatments for a wide variety of diseases. Cloning is vital to genetic
engineering. Problems do arise from such an advancement. Exploration of women would be a major issue due to the fact that these cloned embryos
need to be implanted into a women 's ' uterus in order to under go gestation. Almost all scientific developments pose positive and negative outcomes.
http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/cloning/
Misconceptions are held about cloning. Most people globally tend to believe that cloning is pain free, not mistake prone and is only done in
laboratories for research. In reality, the first successfully cloned animal known as Dolly the sheep, was successful after twenty–seven

Human Cloning Should be Condemned Essays
Human Cloning Should be Condemned
On November 25, 2001, the news that a firm called Advanced Cell Technology had created human embryos by cloning added new urgency to
Congress's and the nation's deliberations on this issue.
This past summer, by a 265–to–162 margin, the House of Representatives passed a carefully worded ban on human cloning (H.R. 2505) which
President Bush has said he will sign into law. The leadership of the Senate nonetheless has refused to take action on this measure, or even to consider a
temporary moratorium on human cloning research. Further delay will only encourage some researchers to take further irresponsible steps toward the
laboratory manufacture and destruction of human life. Such ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When cloning is done to pursue medical research, the reduction of human life to a mere instrument is even more complete, for a new human being is
created solely to be destroyed for his or her cells and tissues. Even if medical benefits could be derived from such destruction, it is never morally
permissible to achieve good ends through evil actions.
Neither practice should be allowed in a society that claims to respect inherent human dignity. As a representative of the Holy See recently stated to a
committee of the United Nations General Assembly: "The act of cloning... is actually a form of imposing dominion over another human being which
denies the human dignity of the child and makes him or her a slave to the will of others" (31 Origins, December 6, 2001, p. 439).
Evasions and misstatements have entered the public debate to obscure this moral issue. At a recent Senate hearing, even the scientists who published
articles about their success in "cloning human embryos" tried to avoid the word "embryo" and even the word "cloning" to hide the reality of what they

are doing. The fact remains that when somatic cell nuclear transfer is used to initiate embryonic development, a new human embryo is created with the
same genetic constitution as another human being. While some may wish to debate the moral status of this new human

Why Should Human Cloning Be Banned
Introduction Cloning is the process of manipulating DNA and embryonic stem cells to create an identical living organism. The purpose of cloning is to
find medical treatments and to reduce human suffering (Rosalyn). Is it wrong? Is it disrespectful toward nature itself? According to Sir John Gordon,
cloning is not as playing God it is simply copying "what nature has already produced" (Gordon). This new development established a series of debates
because if there are technologies that enable humans to artificially create mammal, sooner or later the same process will be performed on human. This
points to the question, should human cloning be banned? (Cloning: An Overview). Even though there are numerous critics who believe human cloning
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Overtime the fusions between cells occur and form an embryo. This could lead to the transfer of healthy cell in an unborn child who contains diseases
due to genetics from the parents. Unfortunately the research was banned. There are a lot of obstacles standing between the researches of human
cloning that could possibly save many lives.
Diseases such as Alzheimer and cardiovascular diseases can be cured by the process of cloning. Scientists have discovered a method of creating
stem cells (an unspecialized cell that has the ability to become any various differentiated cell) from an embryo. Genetic copies of DNA from a
living healthy person are inserted into an egg which divides in the process of cell division or meiosis, and grows into an embryo. If the process is
successful, stem cells are then extracted, with the healthy gene placed in the DNA, the cells can divides and produce a healthful system. This whole
procedure is for the purpose of improving treatment. However, this action puts fear into a lot of people's minds of using stem cells for other purposes
(Healy). Stem cells can be produced for the desire of new treatments has the potential to fight viruses in the human system and the prosperity will soon
outweighed the terror of human cloning.
Therapeutic cloning has the potential use stem cells to cure diseases. Although there are many benefits the process of obtaining stem cells depends
upon the massacre of the embryo. Nonetheless the benefits

Human Cloning Should Not be Permitted Essay
According to Richard Seed, "cloning is inevitable. If I don't do it, someone else will. There's no way you can stop science" (qtd. in Kadrey 2001).
Depending on one's personal opinion about cloning, human cloning in particular, a quote such as that will most likely either anger a reader or excite
them. Human cloning is one of the hottest topics for debate in society today–the lines are very strictly drawn between those in favor of continuing
cloning research and those who are staunchly opposed to it. Meanwhile, despite public opinion, science trudges on behind closed doors working to
clone the first human. This paper will first provide a thorough, but brief, introduction into the topic of cloning itself, including its history ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, her creation sparked many efforts to end cloning research for fear of future possibilities involving human cloning. Later that same year,cows
were cloned in the same manner, and if scientists had not already been considering investigating the cloning of humans, they were then (Humber and
Almeder 1998). "Animal research has become routine. Mice, sheep, cows, goats, pigs, even a rare Asian gaur–a massive wild ox–have been cloned.
Dogs and cats are expected to appear soon. Primate researcher [Don] Wolf expects to successfully impregnate monkeys with clones sometime this
spring. You can now order up you own cloned cow on the Net" (Alexander 2001).
Recently, the lid on the topic of human cloning has come off in abrupt fashion. Scientists around the world claim that they now have the technology
and participants to clone humans. Of notable interest is an Italian group headed by Severino Antinori and Panos Zavos who have created quite a stir
by saying that they are "...ready to start work on the first human clone within weeks" (Italy doctor 2001). Antinori, an Italian doctor, and Zavos, a
fertility doctor in the United States, claim that they have 700 couples that have volunteered to be a part of this project (Italy doctor 2001). In 1998,
Korean researchers claimed to have cloned what would be the first cloned human. An egg cell that was implanted with genetic material from a
volunteer woman was allowed to divide twice

Should Cloning Happen?
Why cloning should not happen
What is cloning? Well, cloning is the possibility of taking one animal's life to bring others back in.
Cloning is making an exact DNA copy of an organism. You should not clone your pet because of health issues, Differences in your pet and the
cloned pet, and the fact that going to the shelter and adopting is much better, not to mention cheaper. There may be health issues with your cloned
pet. In the article, ВЁShould you clone your petВЁ it says, ВЁImplanting an embryo is an invasive procedure that puts the surrogate mother through
enormous stressВЁ. A poor surrogate mother dog has no choice but to go through all this pain to birth a dog that will have a shorter life span,birth
defects, and other medical problems. There is a large chance that the cloned animal will die before it is even born. That is a huge waste of your
money. You should do what is best for your pet, Which... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A cloned pet will not have the same character as the original. It will have a completely different temperament which could even be violent. An
animal's temperament depends on the way it was raised and its genes. You could not possibly raise two animals the same exact way. Google says,
You cannot determine or change the genes of a cloned animal to be the same as the original. If an sweet, fluffy, cute bunny dies and the owner chooses
to clone it, the cloned bunny could be mean and skittish. Why even take the risk? Some people may think cloning animals is OK because you can't put
a price on your loved ones, but cloning costs hundreds of thousands of dollars which is way less that taking care of all the animals in the shelter for 2
months. This is a great way to help your community with the costs of a shelter. You would be like a hero. Where is the heroines in investing your
money is practically nothing. In the nutshell having a cloned pet eat up your money and the die before it is born would

Essay on Cloning: How Far Should We Go?
Six years ago, an event in genetic history changed our perspective on "reproduction" and added to our conscience a new element in the study of
biology. On February 23, 1997, the world was introduced to Dolly, a 6–month–old lamb that was cloned from a single cell taken from the tissue of an
adult donor. Ever since the birth of this sheep, a question that never before existed now lingers in the mind of many: should human cloning be a part of
our society?
Recently the ability to clone a human being has become a very realistic possibility. However, the issue ofmorality has taken center stage on this topic.
A Gallup poll taken in 1997 revealed eighty–eight percent of Americans stated, "cloning human beings would be morally wrong" (Dudley ... Show more
Many argue that cloning creates serious issues of identity and individuality and forces humans to consider the definition of self. Some people may
oppose this idea, stating the environment in which a person grows largely contributes to the formation of his or her individuality; however, his or her
appearance would be completely the same as the original. Some then contend that twins have the same appearance and are accepted in our environment.
However, making human cloned twins restricts the individuality artificially, not naturally.
There is also doubt whether a human conceived by cloning would be treated the same as others. In a present school situation where bullying is an
everyday occurrence, the fact of being a clone may be a factor in being bullied. Cloning also diminishes the clone's possibility of living a life that is
in a full sense his or her life. People are likely to always compare the cloned person's performances in life with that of his or her alter ego (Kass 33).
Thus human cloning is an invasion of privacy for the human conceived by cloning. We do not have a right to take away the originality of any human–
even a clone.
Religious thinking should not be an excuse for banning things since all people do not believe one specific religion. However, we should not ignore
religions completely. In fact there are some countries where one religion plays an

Cloning Ethical And Moral Dilemma
Cloning an Ethical and Moral Dilemma
Scott Blakley Jr.
YC English 101, Period 3
Dr. Palm
1 December 2014
Cloning an Ethical and Moral Dilemma Science has been plagued with the limits of ethics and morals of the people that fail to see the bigger picture
that research can help to bring great things to the world. Cloning is one of the major fields that are affected by closed minded beliefs and laws that
prohibit research. Should the search for finding medicine that could save lives and the chance for people to have healthy offspring be denied
because of the misconceptions of different generations? Cloning should be allowed because of the medical benefits that it provides, the only way
that it can become more ethical is with research to find the best techniques, and yet none of this is possible because of the laws that restrict the
research. Cloning is an ethical and moral dilemma as it pertains to how we view not only the lives of people but in fact what we can and cannot do
with our own bodies. Many see cloning as people trying to play god with others lives. This comes from the creation of life and then the use of the
life that was created. Similar to abortion we have to define the meaning of what it means to be a person and whether or not they should be considered
equal. Some may say yes declaring that a person is equal to another because we are both human. This has not been the case though for a great deal of
people. Examples of this are wide and varied from

Should Human Cloning Ever Be Pursued In The Future
I do not think that human cloning should ever be a field that is pursued in the future by scientists. There are a multitude of problems that arise with the
idea of cloning. Even if doctors were able to eliminate those risks, the process of cloning a human being would remain an odd one. The human
population would cease diversity and uniqueness in all areas. Since the cloning process involves taking genes and creating identical ones, all beings
would begin to look and be the same. With a lack of differentiation throughout thehuman race, might lead to higher competition in areas like school,
careers, athletics, etc., and could infringe on a person's freedoms and rights of being individualistic. I agree with many other people that the genetic

Cloning Is Ethically Immoral And Should Never Be Done Essay
Reproductive human cloning is a form of asexual reproduction done in a lab, not by a sperm fertilizing an egg. This issue has been a hot topic for the
past decade after Dolly the sheep was cloning in Scotland. Dolly was the first cloned mammal, whose very existence created much heat in the general
public (Hansen, pg. 235, in Vaughn). Many people believe thatcloning is ethically immoral and should never be done, but others think that scientific
advances can greatly cure diseases. What is human cloning? Human cloning is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human. Human
cloning allows advanced technology to take an initiative in fixing defective genes, however are the precautions taken of what the future has in
store? Cloning should not be an acceptable process in today's society. By making cloning acceptable, we are saying that everyone has the right to
make a replica of them or give permission for others to be cloned. We are also saying that other cloning methods will have the approval of the
community and will be acceptable, yet morally so many religions would disapprove of this method. Picture this. A couple walks into a hospital and
finds out that the baby they are having has Down Syndrome. If the couple decides to alter the gene of the embryo, the baby would be artificially made
instead of natural. The concept of altering genes and human cloning is morally wrong because of the possibility of aging faster, loss of individuality,
and religious and ethical view

When Is Human Cloning Wrong
In February 1997, the scientific world was forever changed by the announcement of the birth of Dolly the Sheep, the first mammal cloned from an adult
cell (Jones 160). For the first time in medical history, science allowed for the possibility of human cloning. With this development came the concern
that scientists would not only speculate about human cloning, but actually seek to attempt it. Such a prospect generates ethical unease from both the
public and Christian community. From a Christian perspective, human cloning creates concerns for the well–being of a cloned child or embryo and
usurps God's plan for human dominion. Human cloning would not be compatible with Christian ethics. In this essay, any reference to the word "clone"
may be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therapeutic cloning holds the potential to treat illnesses like heart and kidney disease, but the methods require that human embryos be destroyed for
the benefit of others (Hansen & Schotsman 76). The Bible directly states that killing is a sin (NIV Bible, Exodus 20:13). Although some may argue that
using an embryo for medicine is not murder, therapeutic cloning create embryos (the very first stage of humanness) for the sole purpose of harvesting
the stem cells, thus ending the budding life of said embryo. This process certainly reflects a form of killing, even if it is only the destruction of an
incredibly early human form. Additionally, taking advantage of human embryos disobeys Jesus' command to love one another (NIV Bible, John
13:34). Jones states that therapeutic cloning "[undermines] the welfare and dignity of human embryos, which as the weakest and most vulnerable of
human beings should under no circumstances be experimented upon" (174). No situation could justify the exploitation of human embryos for the
medicinal benefits of therapeutic

Should Human Cloning Be Pursued? Essay
Unlike some movies, cloning in real life doesn't produce a full grown exact replica of someone. A type of cloning that occurs naturally is when
identical twins are born ("What Is Cloning?"). Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is a type of cloning that has to be done in a lab. In SCNT they
take the nucleolus out of an egg cell, replace it with the nucleolus of a somatic cell (body cell with two complete sets of chromosomes), and make the
egg cell divide into a blastocyst ("What Is Cloning?").
There are two main controversial types of cloning that come from SCNT which are reproductive and therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning
involves the creation of another life and should be banned. "In therapeutic cloning ... there [is no] ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A clone could be used as a perfect donor for a sick person. If this ever happened the clone would be subjected to painful procedures and forced to live
his/her life completely for the purpose of another. "Allowing cloning would be taking a significant step toward a society in which human beings are
grown for spare body parts, and children are engineered to custom specifications; and that's not acceptable" (Bush).
Reproductive cloning could also be abused by people who want to create genetically superior children. Using reproductive cloning you could clone the
world's greatest athletes and geniuses. As crazy as it sounds, this would open up the door to future possibilities of a world where genetic discrimination
is the norm like in the movie GATTACA.
Therapeutic cloning, unlike reproductive, is a lot more productive than harmful. The stem cells created from therapeutic cloning will have the potential
to turn into many different types of body cells. Stem cells can replace worn out or damaged tissues and is an alternative to organ donation. It is less
likely to result in rejection by the recipient because the tissue would be made from the recipients own genetic material. Like stated previously,
therapeutic cloning does not involve the creation of a live human being.
However, despite the benefits of therapeutic cloning, there are huge controversies surrounding the topic. One argument against therapeutic cloning is
that creating stem cells on a

Should Cloning Be Allowed Research Paper
Should Cloning be Allowed?
One of the best possibilities of cloning are the amazing medical possibilities. With cloning, people can now potentially treat diseases such a diabetes.
Cloning also makes future parents not have to worry about their children having diseases that will affect their entire life, with cloning we can help cure
these and let all people live life to the fullest potential. While some people call it abnormal to be able to clone people because it can't be done
naturally, other organisms clone themselves and thrive in today's society. The cloning debate will probably turn out like most others, where people
didn't want to at first but then after allowing it to happen appreciate the possibilities of it.
One of the biggest reasons cloning should be allowed is because of the curing possibilities. Now with cloning becoming an option for medical
purposes, now diseases can be cured with gene therapy (Keyser). As cloning ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many people dislike it because it interferes with their religion, or just feel as if it disrupts nature and the way things are naturally meant to be done
(Begley). While yes, it has the potential to interfere with religions, it only does if you let it. You can think about it the same way as how some
religions allow you to only eat certain foods, other people eating that food doesn't interfere with your religion, so neither should cloning.
In conclusion, cloning has many massive advantages, that could greatly help our future generations. Cloning can help our future generations by,
making our kids and their kids healthier by potentially eliminating infertility, and by helping cure diseases such as AIDS, and cancer. But one of the
slight disadvantages is the interaction between cloning and religious things. But if we were to ignore the amazing medical possibilities of cloning just
because of the interaction between it and cloning, then it would be a grave

Should Cloning Be Allowed In The United States
I do not think that cloning should not be allowed in the United States let alone in the rest of the world. It can be done on people and animals after
they are dead. People think that cloning will ease the pain of the dead when the clone is not the same person. The person or animal is gone and the
clone is not going to ease the pain. You just have to deal with the pain and you will slowly get through it cloning will never get rid of it. Cloning has
never been the answer if you have lost somebody or something.There could be problems while the cloning process is happening and the clone could
come out wrong. The clone could have something wrong that it could die and kill the person it was cloned after. The people of the world think that a kid

Should Cloning Be Tested And Taught?
There are many arguments as to why cloning should be tested and experimented, for the sake of science. There are also many who oppose the idea of
reproductive cloning. There are many ethical reasons as to why one must not attempt to clone, and there are reasons as to why others believe that there
is no harm in cloning to benefit the world and how we live. However, the reason why I have such a passion and concern for the idea and methods of
cloning is because I have seen it first–hand. I am writing this essay on this specific topic is because I have a personal connection to the process of
cloning.
My grandmother underwent the process of cloning implementation for organs in her body in the Philippines –– where there were no laws against ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She seemed to age much more quickly, developed Alzheimer's, and became extremely weak. She could barely stand on her own and spent much of
her day lying on the hospital bed, occasionally able to go home when she begged the doctor to sleep in her own bed. However, she was consistently
sent back to the hospital in order to take more tests. My grandpa decided to take her off the medical research process immediately after noticing
negative results.
For the past two years, my grandmother has been recovering from this experimentation process and is not fully receptive to what people say to her.
Due to this powerful attempt to use cloning of her organs, or unnatural stem cell reproduction, my grandmother almost lost her life. I do strongly
believe that this method of experimentation with cloning should not be done, regardless of the situation. My grandmother was used as a test
experiment, and the doctors convinced my grandfather that she was getting better and the cloning was working. However, the tests came back negative
and she was only affected poorly by this process of undergoing reproductive cloning.
This is a very controversial topic with the advancements made in science today. I wrote this paper in a Christian perspective, in hopes to voice my
opinions and passion for this topic. Christ sacrificed his life freely out of service for us as imperfect beings. John 13:13 states "You call me 'Teacher'
and 'Lord', and rightly so, for

Human Cloning Should be Permitted Essay example
Human Cloning Should be Permitted
What would you say if I told you that scientists had just developed a new procedure that could lead not only to the cure for cancer, but would provide
an unlimited source of organ donors and could lead to the first effective treatment of nerve damage? Now adding on to this scenario lets say that our
government was taking action to ban this new procedure because of a few myths and some loud mouthed conservatives.
This scenario is true and is taking place with human cloning at this very moment. If you don't act fast this crowning achievement of medical science
could be lost forever. "This procedure will be both a contribution to science and a betterment of the human race." Human cloning will ... Show more
It also could lead to a way to repair damaged nerves by cloning the nerve cells from the injured person.
Millions of Americans suffer from a terrible neurological disorder known as Parkinson disease. This disease affects the control of the muscles. Through
the valuable information about genetics that we will learn through cloning scientists could learn what causes Parkinson disease and learn how to treat it
better.
Nature has a cruel way of dooming innocent children to horribly short and painful lives. Genetically inherited diseases such as hemophilia and Downs
syndrome could be identified and treated while the baby is still in the mothers womb. This could spare countless innocent children and parents from
years of horrible suffering.
Many couples that are infertile still have a great desire to create a new life however the current method in vitro fertilization is very often ineffective.
In fact it only results in a healthy pregnancy 10% of the time. However cloning could be much more effective. Contrary to one of the biggest
arguments against cloning it would not effect the world's genetic diversity because the economics and emotional factors would make very few parents
choose cloning. The amount that will probably clone represents a drop in the ocean of genetic diversity.
Since I began doing this project I have heard countless arguments against human cloning, however

Should We Continue Human Cloning
One event that will probably in happen in the near future is human cloning. Human cloning began inevitable when Scottish scientists made Dolly. The
sheep was cloned on July 5, 1996 which made her the most famous sheep in the world. Dolly was the result of 277 failed attempts. She was actually
formed without a sperm. So Dolly's cell began from a sheep and was fused with a donor egg through electricity. Since the birth of Dolly was a major
scientific breakthrough, scientists wanted to perfect human cloning. So people decided to clone animals because it seemed more ethical than testing
humans. President Clinton signed a five year contract so they can began the cloning of animals and the federal funding. So far, scientists have cloned
mice, sheep, pigs, cows, and many more animals. The chances have now increased to one to four percent. That maybe low however it increased from
a decade ago. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unfortunately, his findings were false once he reviewed his work . If we continue human cloning, scientists hypothesize that somatic cell nuclear
transfer (SCNT) will be the way. SCNT begins when doctors take an egg from a female donor. Once they remove the nucleus, the create an enucleated
egg. A DNA cell is taken from the human being cloned. Next, the enucleated fuses with the subject's cell. This will create an embryo that is implanted
in the mother. If the attempt was a success, the mother gives birth to the clone. However the success rate is only one or two out of 100

Attack of the Cloning Regulations Essay
Attack of the Cloning Regulations
Better and new technologies and ideas are constantly introduced through the passage of time, most of which are just for the convenience of modern
life. There is usually not much of an objection when they are introduced into society because the pros of the idea greatly outweigh the cons; however,
this is not the case with the discovery that human cloning is now practically possible. When a breakthrough like cloning comes about regulations must
be set forth to insure the safety of all those who would use it. On one side there are people who want strong restrictions on cloning. They would prefer
to have cloning be as limited as possible or even banned to prevent any unethical or dangerous ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On the ban cloning side of the argument there is Canada's pro–life pro–family newspaper online known as The Interim. It contains stories and editorials
all about the subject of pro–life and related topics. "Stop Cloning Now," the article selected from the February 2003 issue, is an editorial that discusses
the subject of cloning. The position that the editor takes is that cloning is just plain evil. The main point presented is that cloning is unsafe and should
not be performed under any circumstances. The editorial is divided into several parts covering the topics of why cloning should not be done, what the
public thinks about cloning, and what politicians are doing about it.
Beginning the editorial with a comparison of cloning scientists to Jack Kevorkian is a very powerful use of pathos. It creates in the mind of the
reader the image that both cloning scientists and Jack Kevorkian are evil. There are many people opposed to Dr. Kevorkian and with those who would
clone being made into the equivalent of the doctor then those same people should logically be opposed to cloning.
Next, the editorial starts to talk about the problems with cloning. The first problem stated is that "cloning is unsafe." Ethos is gained in the article by
quoting the head of Russia's Molecular Genetics Institute,

Should Cloning Be Researched?
In the past few decades, the main topic debated by scientists was whether or not cloning should be researched. When anyone even mentions the word
"cloning", they think of all the benefits and cures that the media has portrayed the research for cloning will bring. Although, this belief is nowhere near
the reality of the situation. The research for cloning not only pushes the ethical boundaries, but they also threaten the circle of life by trying to be
god. Before even considering whether or not cloning should be researched or not, people need to have a thorough knowledge of what cloning truly
is. "There are three types: gene cloning (or DNA cloning) is concerned with producing cloned segments of DNA or copies of genes; therapeutic
cloning primarily is concerned with producing cloned embryonic stem cells that can be used to create tissues so as to ultimately treat an injury or
disease; reproductive cloning is concerned with producing a cloned genetic duplicate of existing organism" (Caplan and Arp 73). Therefore, cloning
is used to correct inefficient segments of DNA and make a perfect organism/species. Not only are scientist trying to act like god, their "cloning for
biomedical research will lay the foundations for cloning to produce children" (The Case 56). So in reality, this means that cloning will transition a
species from reproducing sexually to reproducing asexually (Scientific 27). Even the current president of the United States believes that child cloning "is

Should Therapeutic Cloning Be Banned
There are two sides to the topic of cloning. One side believes it is unethical and should be banned. The other side believes the benefits and possibilities
outweigh the problems. The two most controversial types of artificial cloning are reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning
is the use of cells from a host to create a whole new genetic copy. Therapeutic cloning is the use of embryonic stem cells to create tissue to replace
damaged tissue and whole organs. The ethical concerns with cloning didn't become a problem until Dolly, the sheep, was created. Many years before
Dolly very similar experiments were being performed; however, those experiments did not spark much public concern regarding cloning. Over fifty
years ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Animal protection agencies are questioning the many health problems that come with cloning. As mentioned before, cloning causes many problems in
the cloned animal and the host mother. People that are against cloning also bring up the costs of cloning. For example the cloning of a deceased pet
may cost upwards of a hundred thousand dollars. However, most of the controversy with cloning is the ethical side of cloning. Many religious groups
believe that scientists are playing God by producing unfertilized embryos(Hinrichs). They believe that certain areas, such as the creation of life, should
be left up to divine control. People may find that therapeutic cloning could be found unethical and controversial, because of its possible use as alternate

Should Cloning Be Allowed?
Should cloning be allowed? By Arichelieu Obei
English IV
Mr.Wilson
Period 4th
3/14/2017
Well to begin with, what is cloning? Is cloning even real? Is it a thing? Do people clone people? Or animal? Is that even possible? Are clones robot
or humans? Do they have a heart? Can they think like us normal people? Can they reproduce? And make baby clones? Are they allowed to have the
same rights as us? What's the cost of a clone? Is it expensive? Can I have a clone? Would they know that they 're clone? Would they ever get out of
control? What's the risk of having one? Are they any good to us or the country/worldпЊЋ? Who even came up with that idea?
Well clones are organisms that are exact genetic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Every year, everyday there are a lot of people dying from different causes. This result in a lot of broken heart, a lot of attitude changes, sometimes it
has some strong effects on family. Kids growing up without a mother or father, or a mother raising a child by themselves because the dad die by
something other than natural cause. Cloning can help in way to prevent all these broken hearts and family. For example let 's say for the military they
didn 't have to send real man and women to war. Creating a lot of clones and train them for combat instead of real man and women. The clone
might be able to learn more and attack better than real people. This can result of winning more war. Less people dying less problem. The clones
can be so much more help for us. Let's say our troop are in a no man 's land and back up can't reach to them to bring them supplies and ammo with
the clone u can send them with the supplies as a distraction while the real soldiers are heading toward the other soldiers with supplies and ammo.
A lot of the rescue mission the clone would be of good help to us. For example, WWI there was so many lives that got taken. A lot of children got
drafted less than 20 year old barely lived life. Some didn 't get to pursue they dream they went of to war and a lot of them didn 't make it back to their
family or to pursue what they wanted to do. Before they got drafted. During WW1 an "estimated of 10 million military

Have you ever read a book, seen a movie, or watched a television show where the villain creates a colossal clone army that is unmatched by any other.
Though science fiction tends to bend reality to fit a story, human cloning is becoming a feasible practice. Recently there has been a successful cloning
of a sheep, so scientists start to speculate the different uses of cloning human embryos. The three forms of cloning that stand out are reproductive
cloning, therapeutic cloning, and cloning for scientific research. Cloning should be permitted, but only reproductive cloning should be permitted
with a limit on the number of babies a person or family can reproduce. The arguments that support cloning depend on the type of cloning being
discussed: Reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning are some of the methods of cloning. Reproductive cloning is the cloning of a human
embryo and implanting it into a female to have a child. Some supporters of reproductive cloning are couples that are unable to bear a child or
individuals who wish to raise a child by themselves. Another group that seeks reproductive cloning are those who want their child to be born with
specific traits with the help of egg donation. On the other hand, therapeutic cloning is the creation of a clone not for the purpose of raising a child,
but in order to harvest stem cells from the embryo (Woodward 85, 15, 33, 34). Supporters of this form of cloning believe that stem cells from embryos
can be implanted through a

Why Should Animal Cloning Be Banned
Human and animal cloning should be banned, that's what i believe. Animal cloning is not as bad as human cloning but it should be banned. The
procedure to clone a human or a animal is difficult, risky, and most important expensive. Also many people are against it and if it becomes legal or
official it could cause polemics between our people and religions.
Human cloning is a very controversial theme. The reason why it is controversial is because of their religion beliefs. Many religions do not approve
human nor animal cloning. Human cloning could disrupt the peace between our citizens due to their beliefs. Human cloning (reproductive) requires
of a woman's body, and if cloning is approved and made legal or official, in a couple of years there would be an exploration of women's bodies. Just
how Bush the ex–president of the United States of America said in the article "President Bush calls on Senate to Back Human Cloning Ban." In the
article " What Ever Happened to Cloning?" it gave us a good reason why cloning is bad. Leonard (the writer) stated that a "study revealed that the
sheep created from the same biological matter used to make Dolly, the first cloned mammal, were aging normally and living healthful–crumbling and
apparently widely held impression that cloning created unhealthy animals." This study is very important because if it creates unhealthy humans.
This type of cloning should be banned until it's totally safe, not 80% or 90%, 100% safe. Also a cloned child would have to live a depressing
childhood if the religious people around him know he/she is a cloned child, this children would most likely live a dark life. Animal cloning is not
such a good idea too. As how the article "what ever happened to cloning?" stated, cloning makes unhealthy animals. There is no reason to clone
common animals like cats, dogs, or even birds. Why clone animals that can probably develop an unhealthy life. Instead of cloning cats and dogs, why
not adopt the ones that don't have a home? There are many of them out there in the streets and in dog pounds that need a home, a lovely owner. There
are not just a couple of them, there are hundreds and thousands of them dying out there, and we are just going to clone the ones that

Should Cloning Be Beneficial?
In addition, there are individuals who approve of the idea of cloning and do not have a problem with "making life" identical to what already exists.
These individuals argue that cloning can and should be used for medical purposes, and can also provide nations with accessible clones to do "dirty
jobs" or participate in the military forces in order to benefit the country. Others decide that cloning is justifiable in order to replace a deceased child or
pet or to even enable infertile couples to have children. While many people agree that cloning can be beneficial, I argue the idea that they may be
ignoring one huge key factor – this act is a violation of nature. To be a human, one must have the qualities of a human, which include emotions and
unique personal thoughts. Will a clone have their own unique distinguishable thoughts as well? The process and implementation of cloning removes
our individuality and God–given abilities as humans. The idea of creating a completely separate entity, a living, breathing entity not created by the
Creator is in my opinion, ethical injustice.
The goal of cloning is to create identical genes. This method is a process of replication in genetic constitution, which results in lack of differentiation in
gene diversity. Reducing the diversity of genes weakens the human population's ability of adaptation. Cloning is also detrimental to the beauty that
comes from diversity, which is truly valuable especially in a Christian perspective. God has created

Arguments On Human Cloning
Human cloning has been around since 1952 and up to this day, the issues surrounding cloning of humans remain a hot topic. People are divided on both
sides of the controversy and morally the arguments are broader. The word "cloning" is mostly used in everyday communication to mean and represent
many different technological procedures. More specifically,cloning is defined as somatic cell nuclear transfer. Human cloning is a very controversial
topic as well as a tremendous breakthrough in today's technology and science. There have been many experiments on animal cloning which have been
successful, and because of these discoveries, there is a belief that human cloning would be successful too.
Many individuals argue that each human life is unique and born of a miracle that is beyond laboratory science. A fundamental argument is that cloning
is ethically wrong, and many religious groups have rejected it saying that cloning is equivalent to "playing God". And cloning goes against these
certain religions because they believe only God has created life and its various forms in nature, and humans should have no right to act like "God". And
many others argue that human cloning should continue for many reasons. One of them being that cloned humans embryos would make research into
genetics and genetically related diseases and their preventions or treatments, much easier, as well as cheaper. Embryo cloning has also been seen as a
potential treatment for infertility when in–vitro fertilization is not available. And this can occur when parents are infertile, or when both or one of the
parents harbor a genome coding for certain undesirable traits or beliefs. Cloned embryos tissues could be used for the replacement of lost or diseased
tissues. Some experts believe that embryo should not require any moral consideration. Reason being that they believe at the stage an embryo is
cloned, it is basically just a bunch of cells that contain DNA, which are considered no different than the millions of skin cells we shed daily. At that
stage, embryonic cells should not be considered equivalent to human beings because it does not have any self–awareness, memory, feelings, thoughts,
organs, legs, arms, etc. However, adult cloning might be

Pros Of Cloning
There are animals, plants, and possibly humans that have all been cloned before. "Either they have been artificially or naturally cloned" (Stratfor).
Scientists are still researching on how to artificially clone humans. The amount of technology in this world, anything is possible. "The first ever
artificially cloned animal, was a sheep named dolly" (Stratfor). It took a lot of difficult work for the reproduction. Humans should be cloned for extra
body parts. Those extra body parts could save lives. Cloning should be used in this world, so that no animals could go extinct and humans will
hopefully be able to be coned in the future.
The earth has created a variety of people and animals. Most of the people and animals are usually different, since people are humans and not animals.
"Creatures are easier to clone compared humans" (Begley). Humans should only be cloned for spare body parts not to have an exact replica of itself.
When dolly first became cloned, humans wanted to then be cloned. Several movies about cloning have inspired scientists to research more about
cloning. Other movies often have the idea of cloning wrong, like the film "Multiplicity", ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is important to not get replicas and clones mixed up. When something is cloned, it means that they have created an embryo, not another human. "An
embryo contains the same genes and DNA as the adult who got cloned" (human cloning). After the Dolly got cloned, scientists knew that it was going
to be hard to clone humans. It took a lot of time and effort to get precise on the process. Many people believed that the embryo could just stay in an
environment like what the adult lived in. "The embryo has to stay in a different environment for the development" (Human Cloning). The steps to
complete the development is very important because if one mistake is made, the whole development is

Arguments Against Therapeutic Cloning
For many years there has been a large controversy over the use of cloning for therapeutic and reproductive purposes. The argument against
therapeutic cloning is that creating an exact replica of one's self all for the use of harvesting its parts is considered killing another human being.
However, some people are for this use so that they can survive as long as they can, and use the clones materials as a way to cure disease or heal
injuries. On the other hand, reductive cloning also has two sides, for and against. People who believe that reproductive cloning is okay, want to create
another version of themselves just to either have themselves as a baby or replace a loved one. But, people who are against reproductive cloning
believe that it is a selfish or unreasonable act to have one birth a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some people fawn over the idea of cloning themselves and to have a replica of themselves be birthed by a surrogate mother. However, I believe
that parents who are selfish would use the advantages of having a baby clone of themselves will overuse the power, and distinguish the rights of the
baby. Since parents have legal right over medical decisions for the child, there is nothing from preventing them from harvesting their own child for
their own good. I may be completely against reproductive cloning, however, some people and/or parents feel as if having a clone of a lost one will
make up for their absence. Recreating someone doesn't mean that it is the same as the original because, with different external impacts, a clone can
easily have different personalities, feelings, and memories. Therefore technically trying to bring back someone back, will be emotionally unsuccessful.
With the technology that our world has today, reproductive cloning is absolutely possible and has been done before, but I believe that it will damage the
human

Though many have agreed that cloning should not be further researched there are still those who believe otherwise. Why exactly do people believe
that research on human cloning should be allowed? A significant reason is that cloned embryos are believed to be a necessity for research on
embryonic stem cells that have proven to have the potential to revolutionize medicine worldwide. "Scientists believe that cloned embryonic stem cell
research will lead to cures for many diseases and will provide tissues and organs for transplant and treatment of degenerative conditions." (Lauritzen)
Although most scientists are nearly unified in their opposition to cloning humans for reproductive purposes (Klotzko pg. 120), on–going research
towards other goals makes it difficult for most to oppose the research. This is because research done on therapeutic cloning is directed and motivated
by the anticipation that cloning technology will have compelling health benefits to many. Cloning is hoped to possibly lead to transplant therapies
with the assistance of cloned embryonic stem cells that are altered and modified to individual patients using their own DNA. If methods of therapeutic
cloning using the cloned embryos are found to be successful, then organs could become available to those who are terminally ill or just ill, using these
perfectly matched and harvested cloned organs. Cloned embryos could provide genetically perfect tissues and organs that could save countless lives
and even

The Cloning Of The Sheep
Name: Lanster Yang
Teacher: Mrs. DeGregorio
Course: English III
Date: 8 May 2015
Human Cloning
Cloning of Dolly the Sheep was a first on many fronts. First, it represented the first mammal ever to be cloned from a somatic cell. It also sets a
benchmark on which to evaluate other animal cloning experiments going forward. Secondly, her cloning was the start of controversy and panic in
regards to animal cloning, as it raised the question of whether scientists would seek to clone humans too, and the ethics behind such a practice, should
it ever be adopted. Over the past few years, animal cloning has yielded remarkable results, and this has given scientists hope of a possible human clone
over the next few years (University of Utah Health Sciences n.p.). When such reports of cloning success appear in the media, only few attempts works.
However, for every success story, there are many other cloning experiments that have dismally failed. Out of 100 cloning experiments, less than three,
at the maximum, yield viable offsprings (Harper n.p.). Even for these few success stories about cloning, problems often emerge later, as the animal
develops towards adulthood. Although there is limited scientific explanations for the cause of such high failure rates, most researchers believe that it is
an indication of the technical hurdles facing cloning experiments. The important lesson that can be drawn from the cloning of animals is the likely
influences in case humans are cloned. While a growing

Should Cloning Be Banned In The United States?
Cloning is an individual grown from a single somatic cell or cell nucleus and genetically identical to it. Cloning should not be permitted or continued to
be studied here in the United States or even in other nations, because aging faster, interference with nature and religious ethics, reduces individuality,
failed attempts, and degrading organs.
First, cloning should not be permitted since it risks the possibility of faster aging. The cells used for cloning are being obtained from older cells like,
most older woman are who volunteer to donate their cells. This is not right for the process, because while the embryos are growing they are being
exposed to older cells, which can create premature aging issues, and even death. According to C. Johnson ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
People feel that human cloning is a mute debate, since the process made has not been successful. According to greengarageblog.org, "In fact, over
90% of human cloning attempts have been labeled as "failure", which means that the human DNA is only put at risk during the process. As you can
understand, human DNA can be contaminated, and the chances of success are very rare". This means that the implications of what happens when the
process goes wrong are still not understood, which is not correct and could lead to serious problems that we might not be able to

The Effects Of Cloning On The World Today? Should...
How has the idea of cloning affected the world today? Should scientists advance further through experimentation of human cloning? Cloning is a
generic term that describes the fabrication of a biological material with the same genetic makeup as that of the original or copied material. Mammalian
cloning has its benefits, such as the eradication of defective genes (gene cloning), the use of cloning as an alternative infertility treatment (reproductive
cloning), and the provision of a companion of sorts (therapeutic cloning). However, recent statistics show that sixty percent proclaim it is morally
wrong to clone animals and eighty–one percent state it is unacceptable to clone humans. Why?
The results of the 1996 experiment of cloning Dolly and many other unsuccessful trials have influenced many people to infer that the drawbacks of
cloning substantially surpass the benefits. After two hundred and seventy–seven attempts to clone a sheep, many have concluded that cloning has a
high failure rate. Moreover, the death of the sheep clone, Dolly, depicts that cloning a mammal can result in arthritis, a virus–induced lung tumor,
premature aging, and/or premature death, to a list a few effects of cloning. Although scientists and researchers have justified Dolly's medical diagnosis,
they are still uncertain as to why Dolly's chromosomes had shorter telomere lengths than normal sheep. Nevertheless, cloning mammals, particularly
humans, should be proscribed due to the severity of the side

Should Cloning Be Beneficial?
"Clones can happen naturally–identical twins are just one of many examples" (Cloning). Cloning has a lot of controversy surrounding it. Some people
believe that it shouldn't be used in science. There are also people out there that believe it is extraordinary and should be used on a daily basis. There
are many benefits to cloning, but there are also many things most people don't know about genetic cloning, such as how it works and that it
occasionally happens naturally. I will be writing about how genetic cloning works, the risks involved, and how it can be beneficial. "Clones are
organisms that are exact genetic copies. Every single bit of their DNA is identical" (Cloning). Clones can range anywhere from clones of whole
organisms to clones of cells. "There are two ways to make an exact genetic copy of an organism in a lab: artificial embryo twinning and somatic cell
nuclear transfer" (Cloning). Artificial embryo twinning is the "low–tech" way to create clones (Cloning). Artificial embryo twinning mimics the
process in nature that creates identical twins (Cloning). In nature, twins in the first days after the egg and sperm join (Cloning). The embryo at this
point is still made of a small number of unspecialized cells (Cloning). Identical twins are genetically identical because they are developed from the
same fertilized egg after the embryo splits in half (Cloning). "Artificial embryo twinning uses the same approach, but it is carried out in a Petri dish
instead of inside

Should Human Reproductive Cloning Be Legal Essay
The matter of human reproductive cloning is a complex topic, in which there are many issues that must be addressed before any actions take place.
Any decision based on reproductive cloning will not be clear–cut, and instead will host a multitude of ideas. In this paper, I will determine, through
philosophical thinking, if human reproductive cloning is morally appropriate.
First and foremost, it is important to discuss what human cloning is. It is the conception of in vitro embryos that produces "individuals that are exact
genetic copies of the donor from whom the DNA was obtained" (Munson 366). In Laymen's terms, cells are inserted from the donor host into an
unfertilized egg from another host (meaning it is asexual) and the new egg is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This theory is applicable to the topic because it is based on doing our moral duty, no matter what our own desires entail. Our tools in determining the
correct action to do are universality and respect for others. Therefore, any solution of our problems must stem from these necessities. We are hence in
search of the "maxims that satisfy the categorical imperative", or the "motive force behind our actions ...that determines [our] moral character"
(Munson 872).
Initially, we must consider the major possible courses of action. The first possibility is that human cloning is allowed. Scientists test experiments
freely without constraints from the government. To analyze this in the views of Kantianism, we must apply "universalizability" or the idea that we
must act consistently and apply a moral maxim to all similar cases (Munson 871). By applying this idea, we now cannot allow this first course of
action to take place. By allowing any sort of experimentation to exist would lead to high probability of birth defects and can also cause great
detriment to the surrogate mother, as discussed above. It simply cannot be morally permissible to allow this freelance kind of research to occur
without monitoring, as the act of implanting an embryo can be perilous within itself, and is bound to harm someone. By causing harm to a person, we
are then causing the person to suffer. Causing a person to suffer goes

Inhumane And Ethical : The Pros And Cons Of Cloning
Cloning Imagine if you lived in a world where everyone was the same and had no physical differences. Everyone would have the exact same DNA.
There would be no diversity within the population. If we continue to clone then this may be a possibility for the future. As of now there have been no
cloned humans, but we are not too far away from being able to do so. Scientists have been cloning since as early as 1886, and have been cloning
animals since 1996 with the birth of Dolly the sheep. Dolly the sheep was created by using reproductive cloning which is used to produce copies of
whole animals (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Furthermore, there are two other types of cloning; therapeutic cloning and gene cloning. Therapeutic
cloning is used to produce embryonic stem cells for medical research (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Gene cloning is used to produce copies of genes
or segments of DNA (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Cloning should not be allowed because it is inhumane and unethical, results in more failure than it
does results, and is unfeasible. Cloning is inhumane and unethical because it creates animals and embryos that will be used for painful research
experiments. Additionally, a painful surgery is required to remove the eggs from the breeding stock and implant the embryos back into them. Also, a
good deal of the animals that survive past infancy have abnormalities and health problems that include respiratory distress, brain lesions, metabolic
problems, skeletal malfunctions, and

Human And Animal Cloning : Should It Truly Beneficial?
Human and Animal Cloning: Would it Truly be Beneficial In a generation where improving life is the main priority, the idea of cloning humans and
animals in order to do just that remains extremely far–fetched, being opposed on scientific, economic, and ethical accounts. Admittedly, the idea of
cloning, both animal and human, has the potential to cure diseases and create a healthier generation with a better quality of life. "Cloning technology is
already here" and could "produce results that would be of enormous benefit to mankind" ("Pros" 1; Cohen 6). Clones could be created specifically
to be compatible and provide healthy organs for transplantation to normal humans or animals with failing organs (Badertscher 2). Five pigs, cloned
in 2005 in Blacksburg, Virginia show evidence of "harvesting organs for medical purposes" ("Pros" 13). Infertile parents could clone themselves and
"create a younger twin of the mother or father" instead of dealing with the current pains of infertility treatments ("Pros" 2). Cloning is speculated to
find faster cures or treatment for medical conditions like Alzheimer's disease, cancer, and diabetes ("Pros" 1; Driscoll & Griswold 2). In addition, the
possibility of eliminating "defective genes" and "genetic mutations" caused by damaged DNA lines that are becoming more common as humans
constantly reproduce surfaces with cloning. Healthy human cells could be cloned to eventually rid the "defective genes" ("Pros" 2). Cloning could
truly be a

Cloning Persuasive Essay: Why Should We Clone?
Why Should We Clone?
Can you imagine living among species that have been long gone like the dinosaurs? It's a reality that scientists are trying to make happen with a
procedure called cloning. Cloning is a process in which a part of DNA in an organism is extracted and is used to replicate the organism. Cloning has
brought up a controversy whether or not cloning is worth its risks. But why should it be allowed? Humans and animals already reproduce and cloning
is just another step forward with that. Cloning should be allowed. Cloning allows scientists to reproduce deceased animals to study them in more depth,
which also allows them to study the environment and the past when the animals were alive. Its also important because you can see the evolution ...
George Church, the lead researcher working to de–extinction of the mammoth at Harvard, says that bringing back the mammoths could help convert
the Arctic tundra back to the grasslands that existed during the last ice age. Reviving the mammoth could help slow climate change by shifting the
landscape back toward the grasslands. This is the case for many other animals, with another example being the passenger pigeon, whose extinction
was man made. After its species termination it caused forest fires and many other calamities. Bringing back this this animals and many more can
help restore parts of the earth's environment. Another reason is that over 5,689 species are endangered and they are rapidly becoming critical.
Cloning can help save these animals from the same faith, as animals like the passenger pigeon and dusky seaside sparrow. Kurt Benirschke the
director San Diego Zoo's Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species (CRES) launched a program that freezes the cells of endangered species.
The frozen cells could be used to clone the animals to slow down their extinction. Meaning that some animals can be saved from their

Should Human Cloning Be Allowed In The USA
My topic was that I researched was Should Human Cloning be Allowed in the USA. I am for this because it can be a medical breakthrough. I am
for it because it can cure many things the people struggle with every day. For example, I will talk about how people die from cancer and how we can
stop it. And I will also be talking about how cloning can make transplants and saves even more people. And howhuman cloning can be bad and how it
can affect us in the real world and how it can affect our supplies on this world.
For example, Simon Smith from the article The Benefits of Human Cloning say, "Skin for burn victims, brain cells for the brain damaged, spinal cord
cells for quadriplegics and paraplegics, hearts, lungs, livers, and kidneys could be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because if we bring these perfect people into this world, then many right will be taken away because we won't need any rules or anything. People
don't see how the clone can destroy the world as it is. Many people just see the pros of human cloning. Many people only see the good because that's
all anyone talks about. They never go over how new things can hurt you. For example, Many people thought that that hover board as the best thing to
ever come out. But as soon as people started to buy them, they started to blow up on people. I'm not saying that that they are bad, but we should be a
little cautious about the

Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned
In 1997, Dolly, a successfully cloned sheep was born, forever opening the eyes of scientists in the world of cloning. However due to unforeseen
medical conditions she lived a short life, being put down due to progressive lung disease and arthritis at the early age of six years old. Ever since
Dolly the sheep, it has been discussed in the scientific community whether or not human cloning is possible, let alone a good idea. Though there are
many people who are in favor of such scientific abominations, there are still many who disagree and see the true evil. Within the many faults involved
in human cloning, there are moral reasons it should be banned such as, it being against nature, religious activists would revolt, and uncertain results ...
It is said that the human population will reach eleven billion by the year 2100. We are quickly becoming overpopulated and with creating human
clones, we will surely reach that number much sooner, making our population far much worse than it already is. Cloning would be a definite aid to
overpopulation. Overpopulation is a problem because it causes us to exhaust our natural resources. With more lifeforms being created we would all
require the same, if not more, nutrients. As a civilization now, we are currently running thin on basic needs such as food, water, and oil. Clones would
be competing with humans for natural resources and the rate of consumption will not keep up with rate of production. Overpopulation would lead to
the cease of human existence by diminishing the valuable natural resources we require to survive.
Science is known to push boundaries and having no limits. In science there are no "laws" or anything that scientists can't do with their technology.
Which is quite frightening when thought about. Scientists are willing to go as far as their minds can possibly take them just for a new invention or
idea for an experiment. Project Artichoke would be a perfect example of scientists urge to do as they wish. Project Artichoke was a mind control
project taken place in the 1950s which scientists wanted to see if they could get another individual to do their bidding against their

Human Reproductive Cloning Should Be Banned Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Erin Ross

More from Erin Ross (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Human Reproductive Cloning Should Be Banned Essay