Rene Descartes Argument Analysis

Rene Descartes Argument Analysis
The father of modern philosophy, Rene Descartes, has had a significant impact on the realm of
philosophy. The theory of mind–body dualism, a belief that the mind and the body are two distinct
substances capable of operating independently, is among Descartes' most popularized work.
However, this argument has stirred controversy amongst various philosophers, ultimately giving rise
to the mind–body problem. This essay will closely examine the basis of Descartes' argument, as well
as critique its weakest premise.
In Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes states: I think, therefore I am. Descartes is able to cast
doubt on the existence of his body, but not on the existence of his mind. As a result, Descartes
concludes that there must be two substances, one mental and the other physical, that form one ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Interactionist, like Descartes, believe that the mind and the body are two separate entities capable of
interacting with one another. This is a puzzling assertion. How is it that a purely mental entity can
affect a purely physical entity? The complexity surrounding this question is often regarded as the
mind–body problem. The mind–body problem causes many to question why it is a separate entity,
known as the mind, is residing as well as controlling one's body. If the mind has chosen that body to
occupy in particular, is it possible for the mind to then leave and occupy another? Descarte fails to
offer a proper rationale for the many questions listed. Descarte says that the mind is connected to the
body in the pineal gland, which is located at the base of the brain, and that all mind–body
interactions are processed through that portal between the mind and body. However, Descartes
reasoning does not successfully solve the problem since the pineal gland is a part of the physical
body. It is then clear, that Descartes argument is
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay on René Descartes
René Descartes René Descartes was a French philosopher and also mathematician. His method of
doubt led him to the famous "cogito ergo sum" when translated means "I am thinking, therefore I
exist". This cogito was the foundation for Descartes' quest for certain knowledge. He explored doubt
and how we can prove our own existence, by taking the first steps of scepticism. His book
"Meditations On First Philosophy", was written in six parts. Each representing the six days that God
took to create the world. Not to upset the Church, Descartes would need to prove the existence of
God, and the soul. Within Descartes' argument, we find some important areas. Two, which require
focus, are his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He came to the conclusion, that to doubt is to think; and to think is to exist. An example in Russell's
"Western philosophical thought" is that "anything, which doubts, understands, affirms, conceives,
wills, denies, imagines and feels is something, which is thinking. And feeling, when it occurs in
dreams, is thought". So therefore anything which thinks, also too exists. In Descartes' wax example,
he takes a piece of wax from the honeycomb in it's solid form. He observes that there are certain
things, which are apparent towards the senses. The taste of the honey, its temperature (cold), the
size, the colour, and when you tap it, it makes a sound. Yet, if we place the wax near heat, or a fire,
the features and qualities change. No longer is the shape the same. It has become hot, and when you
tap it there is no sound. This is the wax in its liquid form. So is the wax we see now, the same wax
we saw before these changes? Before these changes were apparent, Descartes pointed out the
difficulties of relying on the senses, of the physical body. In section 31 of Meditation two, he says
that the perception he has, "is a case not of vision or touch or imagination – nor has it ever been,
despite previous appearances – but of purely mental scrutiny". Descartes shows that our senses
cannot be used to have knowledge of things in the external world, and that knowledge of these
things must come through the mind alone.

The Meditations by Rene Descartes
In Descartes' Meditations, his goal to prove the existence of things could only be accomplished if he
was logical, clear, and correct in his thoughts and writings. The most important issues he noted were
the threat of being deceived and the potential of being incorrect in his judgments, both of which
would lead him into error. Error exists as a problem that individuals encounter on a regular basis,
and it also exists as a focal point in Descartes' Meditations. Descartes defines error as "a privation or
lack of some knowledge which somehow should be in me." As a "thinking thing", which he defines
as "a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, is willing, is unwilling, and also imagines and
has sensory perceptions"¹, Descartes must ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Judgments made when there is some disparity between intellect and will are potentially erroneous,
and must be avoided due to this (pp.38–41). Descartes states, "...the scope of the will is wider than
that of the intellect; but instead of restricting it within the same limits, I extend its use to maters
which I do not understand" (Descartes, 40). Error exists because of this, and it is seen in a complex
interaction between the faculty of intellect and the faculty of will. While it is clear that one cannot
become all–knowing, he can be free of errors as long as no judgments are made on subjects that are
not completely understood. As the intellect merely presents ideas in the mind, the errors made are in
their judgments, and the incorrect use of free will. It is important to be aware of the distinction
between the faculty of free will and the actual use of free will, as the faculty is perfect yet error may
exist in its use. Error is shown as a result of the incorrect use of the tools granted to us, and it stands
that error can be eliminated when these tools are only used to the best of their ability; any further
use is clearly how we come to err (p. 43).
Work Cited
Rene Descartes, The Meditations, tr. John Cottingham, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes
Vol. 2, ed. John Cottingham, Robert Stoofhoff, Dugald Murdock (New York: University of
Cambridge Press, 1984), p.

A Brief Look at Rene Descartes
Rene Descartes was a brilliant man who came up with many inventions and thoughts to put in
people's minds and let them ponder off and question life in itself. In one of the many things Rene
Descartes created, he wrote a book called Discourse on the Method and Meditations. Descartes
discusses how there are two main proofs of God's existence, the casual argument in meditation three
and the ontological argument in meditation five. There are a few differences between these two
meditations and one is more convincing of the other, but Descartes needed these two proofs to prove
a certain point. Also, he shares in meditation four how human error is possible even though a perfect
God created humans. Although, those are points that Descartes spent a lot of time thinking about and
attempting to prove, they are not really convincing points that can be believed. In the third
meditation, Descartes discusses how God does in fact exists and is perfect. It is definitely more of a
cosmological argument that is more so for the thinkers in the medieval times. Descartes claims "I
think there for I am." (Descartes, p. 19) He claims that an evil mastermind is misleading him, so he
wants to prove that God exists. He believes of what an ideal being should be but that he could not
come up with that idea on his own, and it was ingrained by God. He exists because God put the
ability in his thoughts to be able to think. God exists in the real world because if he only existed in
Descartes psyche, he

Rene Descartes Research Paper
Rene Descartes was a French philosopher who was lived from the year's 1596 to1650. He was of the
Jesuit background and was a devout Catholic. He was trained as a lawyer and then believed that he
could find knowledge from other people around the world, thus changing his vocation to becoming a
soldier in the army to do so. He then felt unfulfilled and believed that the knowledge that he was
seeking was from within himself. He asked himself questions like: how do we know things? What
can we be certain about? This was the beginning of this method of doubt. In this essay I am going to
explain how Descartes explored doubt by taking things down it their simplest form.
Descartes believed that anything we can doubt, we treat as completely false. But ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
If we believe everything we see is false then what do we know to be true? Descartes goes on to
review his own thoughts, who or what places these thought into one's head? Is the deceiver God
tricking Descartes into believing that these were his own thoughts? Finally the cogito was revealed.
The cogito is the phrase, "I think, therefore I am". It is the rational or thinking mind that all people
have. It is the simplest form. If the body was discarded, or manipulated the "thinking thing" would
still be present. There is no other reason to believe that anything exists besides the mind. Our
rational mind is also our essence, what makes us human beings. Our life is filled with accidental
qualities. These are things that can change but our essence is forever. Descartes uses the example of
wax. When we look at a piece of solid wax we can see things such as its color, its shape, smell and
it's other physical properties; these things are all achieved through the senses. If we take a flame to
that same piece of wax and it starts to look different, it is now a puddle, it probably smells different,
it most likely looks different but it is the same wax from before. Our senses know it as two different
things but our minds know it is the same wax (67). Our mind are far better thinkers than our body.
This is how we know thinking mind is how we know we are truly

Rene Descartes Meditations
1. About Rene Descartes Meditations:
a) What is the function of the doubt in Descartes' Meditations? What are the different stages of
doubt in the Meditations? What does Descartes find to be ultimately indubitable to constitute the
foundation of his new philosophy?
– Descartes function of doubt in Meditations is basically to overthrow skepticism on its own ground,
to begin by doubting everything you know and everything you think you know. The first stage of
doubt is the argument of physical misconception, our senses betray us some of the time but possible
that it betrays us all of the time. The second stage is knowing if one is dreaming or not, some dreams
are so real that its hard to tell if they are indeed real and anything that you see while you are awake
can be a dream. The third stage is the "evil demon, believing that an evil demon who is powerful
enough to deceive you and who is as strong as god but isn't good. He concludes that all clear and
distinct ideas are true and he knows that he exists and that his essential characteristic is thinking, and
by that he means any form of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What is Descartes rationale? Is Descartes' rationale logical?
– No, there is and can be no such thing as evidence of the existence of god. God is not something
anyone can attest or validate, with that being said he is something one can chose to believe in or not.
We imperfect and finite beings visualize the opportunity to be perfect. Descartes wants to prove the
idea of god in his mind as an innate idea and ends up proving it using the ontological argument. I
don't believe it's logical; Descartes finishes with the idea that one must require truth in their cause as
in their effect.
3. What is a virtue (excellence or arête) of character? How is it acquired? What are the essential
conditions that one has to meet in order to develop virtues and lead an ethical

Rene Descartes Perceptions
While reading the assigned articles for the first session of class, the works of several philosophers
and academics came to mind, including Rene Descartes and Thomas Kuhn. Descartes' warning to
doubt everything is one of the overarching themes that stood out in the articles. Descartes believed
that not only personal perceptions can be deceptive, inaccurate, or skewed, but also the testimony of
others has potential to be erroneous. Both Thelin and Eisenmann provide real world examples of
why the existing history of higher education should be looked at with a critical eye, as well as
provide suggestions and recommendations about investigating and re–evaluating existing historical
higher education data. By doubting everything, using modern tools ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Historians can feel pressured to be creative in their interpretation of data in order to present negative
information in a positive light. This is not a situation that is specific to higher education historians,
as it plagues many researchers, journalists, business leaders, and politicians. Eisenmann reports that
researchers should take a strong stance regarding their findings. Ultimately, the historian's
responsibility is to report accurately, not to be someone in the public relations arena. However, early
historians may have been under greater pressure, and when re–investigating their findings it is
important to put the findings in a historical context and also understand the politics of that

Rene Descartes 'Doubting'
1. For Descartes, the main purpose of his project of "doubting" everything he can is in order for him
to find truth.
2. The meditation sweep, or pre stage, in the progressive doubt chain is when Descartes tries to
sweep away all previous known conceptions of things. The first stage in the chain, the imagine if
stage, is when Descartes takes a specific case he has thought of to find doubts in it. The next stage in
the chain of progressive doubt, or the why stage, is when Descartes explores why doubts can be
found for that case and the reasons behind it. The third stage, or the connective stage, is when
Descartes collectively looks at the case, the doubts, and the why of the doubts and tries to connect
them to the mind and thought process. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The discussion of the wax form centers around this idea that our mind knows the truth of the wax
not our senses. Using only our senses, a list of characteristics for wax in solid form can be compared
to a list of characteristics for wax in a melted form. The major difference would be the state of
matter of the wax, solid versus liquid. Taking into account only the senses, we could not truly say
what was is or why it can change characteristics. Now add in the mind to the senses, the wax now
becomes a thing that can have assumptions and expected behavior before the senses have a chance
to perceive them.
5. In the section given, Descartes is trying to argue that there is a great difference between the mind
and body. His conclusion states along the lines that he was correct, the mind and body are
completely different. His reasons include that the body is a tangible thing that can be hacked to
pieces, while the mind and thought cannot be divided in the same way.
6. The main similarity between Descartes' Meditations and "Brain in a Vat" is the connection
between our perception of reality and the mind is explored. The main difference between the two is
how the exploration of this subject takes place. In Descartes' Meditations, he finds his doubts,
questions his senses, and then tries to link his doubts and questions to his mind. In the "Brain in a
Vat," a story given, and left open for the reader to question the reality of the character with no real
answer of what

Informative Essay About Rene Descartes
This is an informative essay all about Rene' Descartes, and if you don't know who Rene' Descartes is
than I will tell you. Rene' Descartes was a French mathematician who later became a philosopher. In
this paper, you will learn about the famous Rene' Descartes, through his personal life, contributions
to math, and some interesting facts about him. Now you know who Rene' Descartes is, here is some
information about his personal life. Rene' Descartes was born in France, in the town of Indre–et–
Loire. Descartes was born on March 31, 1596.La Haye en Touraine was a small town and has been
since then renamed after him to honor its most famous son. Rene' Descartes influenced John Locke,
Isaac Newton, and Baruch Spinoza. Rene' Descartes had no wife and he loved math ever since he
was a little boy. Rene' Descartes had little to no friends and he was called blockhead because he was
so different from everyone else. Not in a bad way. It was because he was super smart. Rene also
earned a baccalaureate in law at the university of Poitiers. Rene was so concerned with a good
education that he was sent to boarding school at age 8. The boarding school was called Jesuit
college of henri IV and was located at LA Fleche and it was several miles to the north. Rene was
there for seven years.Descartes was originally from France but spent much of his life in the Dutch
Republic. He is known as "the father of modern

The aspect of the mind and the body is one of the most heavily debated subjects of philosophy. The
purpose of this paper will be to explore my thoughts against the view of the French philosopher,
Rene Descartes. The question is, are the mind and the brain one and the same? The body is only a
physical form itself, the brain is only part of the physical body. But the mind is only a part of the
brain within itself. Spiritually, they are both connected to each other. Can they take on the form of
each other? No. They are both separate entities altogether. I disagree with Descartes and his belief
that the mind is a physical entity or that he cannot be allowed to doubt his existence, but that
spiritually one cannot exist without the other.
The mind

René Descartes and Thomas Hobbes Essay
During the sixteen hundreds, the French philosopher René Descartes laid the foundations for the
beginnings of Cartesian Dualism. In contrast, the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes argued
against dualism in favor of materialism. Recently, Cartesian Dualism, and dualism in general has
fallen out of favor as materialism arose as a more plausible and explanatory theory regarding the
interrelationships between body and mind. The translation Descartes' writing in the Meditations is
far more cryptic than Hobbes' writing in the Leviathan. Making it far easier to see Hobbes' claims.
Hobbes provides a reasonable explanation against dualism in his objections to Descartes, and in his
Leviathan, provides background upon his reasoning in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Descartes concludes from his first meditation that he is a thinking thing, and as long as he thinks, he
exists. In the second meditation, Descartes attempts to define what the "thinking thing" that he
concluded himself to be in the first meditation actually was. Descartes' determines that he gains
knowledge of the world, that is, knowledge that is separate from the mind, through the senses; and
that the senses can deceive. This he outlines within the first meditation, and mentions on the second
meditation. Furthermore, in the second meditation, Descartes refuses to define himself as a rational
animal, instead going back and relying on labeling him mind as a thinking thing. In the fifth and
sixth paragraphs of the second meditation, Descartes distinguishes the body from the soul. Descartes
indicates that there is the presence of the body, and it seems to be in the physical world, but he also
notes that his mind does not seem to exist in the same manner. Descartes also claims that the ability
to perceive is a power of the soul, but inoperable without the body. Descartes then explores another
object with physical substance, which is a piece of wax. The piece of wax is undeniably physical; it
takes up space within the material world. The body falls into the category, just as any other physical
object in the material world. The main point of Descartes' second meditation is that any given
person can know more about their mind than of the world surrounding them.

Rene Descartes Deceit
Rene Descartes, born in France on March 31st, 1596 contributed immensely to philosophy, science
and math. As an extremely accredited French Philosopher, he formulated many hypotheses that
some individuals still use today. Some deemed Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy
while others simply appreciate the importance of his findings. Descartes argued that the senses are
not to be trusted due to the fact that they are subject to deceit. He addressed the deceit within senses
issue with a idea that he called Method of Doubt. Also a major staple of his life would be when he
abandoned the idea of the philosophies of Aristotle as a whole as he formulated the first version of
mind–body in its entirety. This theory implies that the mind and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
We all have a feature that is called a filing system. In this filing system we create a collection of
thoughts. These collections of thoughts essentially are emotions that we receive from our senses.
Our senses are vision, hearing, taste, smell, and touch. When we see our crush what we may feel.
When we hear our crushes voice, what we may feel. And when we dream and envision our crush
what we may feel. Descartes claims that we compose our own file of experiences even when reality
lacks. He claims we fill our own filing system with imaginary thoughts that may not even be real.
We have the ability to create illusions even with emotions. For example, is people are constantly
learning and storing new information in our mind even when we are asleep. Research has proven
that our mind records audio sound from our background. Audio sound can range from a television
being left on, or music from a neighbors house. What we are hearing is complete reality, however,
our dreams incorporate them as we sleep. This action makes it extremely difficult to know whether
something is real or fake. A dream or a reality becomes hard to recognize. Knowledge helps us to
better comprehend: "that the waking world is just a creation of our minds. It is realizing that as real
and solid as it might seem, the waking world is really just a series of concept and ideas created by
our minds. And, off course, the existence of the mind is

René Descartes Discourse
René Descartes uses Discourse on Method to explain his view that god exists and that human nature
consists of the body and soul, which both interact but can exist without one another. He believed
that the body occupies space but has no mental properties. René believed that it was in fact the soul
or mind that does the thinking or sleeping. Using animals as an example, he highlights in the text
how humans unlike animals possess a soul. In the text, René originally viewed things to be beyond
what they appeared to be, questioning everything. He eventually comes to the conclusion that in
order for him to think, question, or doubt he must in fact exist. This idea creates the quote, "I am
thinking, therefore I exist" Our spirits even come into question and how strong they must be to
control the body with waking up or sleeping. He even uses an example of a head still moving while
being detached from the body saying, "... as when we see a severed heads continue to ... Show more
The body, according to Aristotle, is the best machine which was made by god. Therefore, it is better
than any machine that can be created by man. If the machines by man could made by man could
have the organs of an animal you could tell no difference but you would be able to do so with
humans. This is due to our ability to speak and relay our thoughts. Other actions would also prove
the difference as machine would eventually fail even if they completed tasks better than man. You
see that animal is considered to be inferior to man. This point can be found in the text saying, " On
the other hand, men are born deaf and dumb, and thus deprived of speech–organs as much as they
beasts or even more so, normally invent their own signs to make themselves understood by those
who, being regularly in their own company, have the time to learn their language. This shows not
merely that the beasts have less reason than men, but that they have no reason at

Philosophy Of Rene Descartes
Rene Descartes is an extremely influential philosopher from the 17th century and is widely
considered the father of modern philosophy. One of Descartes's most famous philosophies is his
cogito ergo sum statement: I think, therefore, I am (Descartes, 2008). He believed that because he is
a thing that thinks, then he must have some kind of consciousness or awareness of the world.
Because he has consciousness, he reasons that he must exist, especially since he is aware that he is a
thing that thinks. His physical body, on the other hand, has no awareness. From this stems another
critical part of his philosophy which states that the mind and the body are two separate substances.
This concept is called dualism. Minds are indestructible and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It is well described in philosopher John Searle's work Mind: A Brief Introduction. Searle writes
about many materialistic theories that counter the Cartesian dualism theory. These theories connect
the mind and the body through the relationships between the brain, its functions, the mind, and its
awareness of the world in ways that Cartesian dualism cannot.
One primary materialist theory that John Searle discusses is the identity theory. The identity theory
argues that mental states are simply material, physical states of the brain. This theory affirms an
identity between mental and brain states and accounts for the inner experiences that may not always
be portrayed by behavior. It fortifies the idea that mind, consciousness, and the body are not, in fact,
separate substances, but connected through their physicality and the causal relationship between
inner and external experiences (Searle, 2004). Another aspect that the identity theory elucidates is
that changes in brain states results in changes in mental states. For example: Brain state one will
provoke mental state one. When brain state one changes to a different brain state, brain state two,
then the mental state changes to a different, new mental state, mental state two, directly correlating
with the brain state change. When compared to Cartesian dualism, the identity theory suggests that
Rene Descartes's

Rene Descartes : The Father Of God
A skeptic as defined by philosopher Jonathan Meyer, is "a person who believes that we can never be
absolutely sure what the world is like." Someone who questions everything. For example, they may
often think thoughts like, "what is the origin of the universe?", "where does happiness come from?",
"is the government hiding aliens from us?", "are we really living or are we dreaming?". One of the
most influential skeptics is a philosopher from the 17th century named, Rene Descartes. Descartes is
widely known as the father of modern philosophy. He is the one that created the term "cogito, ergo
sum", or "I think, therefore I am." This term has become one of the base lines for western
philosophy. Descartes was most well known for his method of doubt that he established. He decided
that he would revisit all of his beliefs, and if he could not completely prove them he would scrap
them. His reasoning behind this was, there are so many things that he was always told growing up,
or learned from life itself that he found he didn't know the reasoning behind. He simply believed
these ideas because they were told to him. This is very common, for example your parents saying
that if you pee in a pool, a dark blue dye will surround you, or that cracking your knuckles will give
you arthritis. Descartes' beliefs that he was targeting go a bit deeper than these; however, many
people believe these things as a kid simply because someone told them so. Descartes discovered
many controversial

Certainty Of Rene Descartes
Rene Descartes Rene Descartes was a philosopher of the 17th century. He had this keen interest in
the search for certainty. For he was unimpressed with the way philosophy is during their time. He
mused that nothing certain was coming forth from all the philosophical ideologies. He had
considered that the case which philosophy was in was due to the fact that it was not grounded to
something certain. He was primarily concerned with intellectual certainty, meaning that something
that is certain through the intellect. Thus he was named a rationalist due to this the line of thought
that he pursued. But in his work in the meditation, his method of finding this certainty was skeptical
in nature; this is 'the methodic doubt'. Rene Descartes had attempted to find that something which is
certain to. Only to find that our senses are unreliable and our senses can be deceived. He did find
that something from which he is fairly certain about, which is the 'Cogito'. "Cogito ergo sum" which
is often translated as, "I think, therefore I am." This can be better translated as, "I am thinking,
therefore I exists." This world–renowned saying has been called as the 'First ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
He had assumed this for in his search of finding that something which is certain, he had a "eureka"
moment of realization that the one thinking for the certain is that something which is the certain.
Cogito is the mind. So if we use our definition of certainty, "that something which is a hundred
percent not doubtful, and is upheld and assured with information that is acquired from this world,"
the 'cogito' is still fit to have that definition. We could say that it is a hundred percent not doubtful,
for if we doubt the self, it just strengthens the claim, that the self, is the one doubting. I believe Rene
had use the term, 'indubitable.' The 'cogito' is the indubitable

Rene Descartes Pneumonia Quotes
Rene Descartes was an anatomist, Philosopher and French mathematician. One of Descartes famous
quotes stated, "Cogito ergo sum. (I think; therefore I am.)" (Quotations) Descartes was born in La
Hayne, Touraine, France on March 31, 1594 to an upper– class family. He died on February 11,
1650 in Stockholm, Sweden of Pneumonia. According to the Lung Disease and Respiratory Health
Center, "Pneumonia is an infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs, which many fill with
fluid." (Pneumonia) After his death, Descartes was laid to rest at the Abbey of Saint–German–des–
Pres in Paris. Before Rene was born, soon to be mother Jeanne Brochard and father Joachim
Descartes got married on January 15, 1589 and lived in Chatellerult. At four days

Research Paper On Rene Descartes
Descartes
Is our education complete once a degree has been earned? Have we learned all there is to know?
Can we be sure of what we have come to know? Only a completely self–assured person might
answer yes to these questions, but for Rene Descartes (1596–1650) the completion of his formal
education left him feeling and thinking he was still ignorant about the certainties of human
experience and existence. This prominent Renaissance philosopher conquered the world of
uncertainty in a work written in the 17th century. Mr. Descartes', Discourse on Method, quelled the
skeptics with the assertion, "I think, therefore I am". Most important to Descartes, however, was the
method for which he was able to arrive at this axiom. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Only know that which is "clearly and distinctly to my mind". Second, to "divide each difficulty I
should examine into as many parts as possible." The third stage he set out to organize his thoughts
into the easiest to the most complex, therefore, creating an orderly examination of the "objects of
knowledge." Finally, critical reviews of the "links in [the] argument" furthered his examination of
the entire puzzle. Mr. Descartes' methodology was paramount to the period in which it was born.
However, it's important to note that Descartes didn't think we could, as humans, understand all
existence or phenomena. We cannot come to know God's purposes. Mr. Descartes was optimistic of
the fact that all men are capable of rational thought or reasoning. He took to a quiet environment and
contemplated the serious problem for which he wanted to reconcile within himself; ho can man
learn knowledge. Facilitating the process of reason is the element Descartes terms, "the natural light
of the mind." He argues that if we are to attain axiomatic truths we must be free of "precipitancy and
prejudice", whereby reason, the natural light of the mind, shall guide us to the certainties which
define our existence. Descartes' methodology was realized through his Metaphysical Doctrine,
which asserted man and god's existence. In deep mediation the philosopher set out to deny
everything which his senses told him. Descartes

Essay about Rene Descartes
Rene Descartes was born on March 31, 1596 in La Haye Touraine, France. Descartes was
considered a "jack of all trades", making major contributions to the areas of anatomy, cognitive
science, optics, mathematics and philosophy. He has been referred to as the father of modern
rationalism, soldier of fortune, scholar, pilgrim, traveler, and a firm adherent of the Roman Catholic
faith. He was educated at the Jesuit college of La Fleche in Anjou. He entered the college at the age
of eight years, just a few months after the opening of the college in January, 1604. At La Fleche,
Descartes formed the habit of spending the morning in bed. His health was poor and he was allowed
to remain in bed until 11 o'clock in the morning. This habit and custom ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It was at this point that he began to seek a unified science of nature. After two years in Holland he
joined the Bavarian army. It was during this time with the army that Descartes wandered through
Europe seeing parts of Hungary, Germany, Italy, and France. During his travels to Paris he made
contact with Mersenne. This was an important contact because it kept him in touch with the
scientific world for many years. In late 1628 he gave a speech in Paris in which he argued that the
sciences must be founded on certainty. He was encouraged by Cardinal Pierre de Berulle to develop
his own philosophical system. By 1628 Descartes tired of all the traveling and decided to settle
down. He gave much thought to choosing a country that suited his nature and decided on Holland.
He felt Holland would offer him seclusion and more intellectual freedom. Soon after he settled in
Holland Descartes began work on his first major treatise on physics, Le Monde, ou Traite de la
Lumiere. This work was near completion when he received the news that Galileo was condemned to
house arrest. He decided not to risk publication. His work, the world's first extended essay on
physiological psychology, was published after his death. While in Holland Descartes had a number
of scientific friends, they encouraged him to publish his ideas. Although he was adamant about not
publishing Le Monde, he did write and publish in 1637 a treatise on science under the

Rene Descartes most known for his saying "I think, therefore I am.", can be described as a French
mathematician, scientist, and a philosopher. He was born in France on March 31, 1596 and he died
in Stockholm, Sweden on February 11, 1650. His parents were Jeanne Brochard and Joachim
Descartes. His mother died before Descartes' first birthday. His father was a council member who
had no time for his family and therefore sent Descartes and his siblings to live with their
grandmother (Smith). However, Descartes' father was obsessed with his children receiving a
thorough education; therefore, he sent Rene Descartes to a boarding school at the Jesuit college of
Henry IV when Descartes was eight years old. It has been speculated that while Rene Descartes ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is suggested that this is where Descartes got his start in mathematics. This is believed because the
division that Descartes was thought to be a part of engaged in applied mathematics. This means that
the division would have designed an assortment of structures and machines aimed at protecting and
assisting the soldiers in battle. In addition to being part of the division that focused on applied
mathematics and engineering, Descartes was stationed at Breta. This army base also doubled as a
military academy for noblemen of the country. Therefore, Descartes could better his education and
knowledge in the mathematical field while he was serving in the army. Descartes was fond of
working in the mathematical field. He is quoted saying "I took pleasure, above all, in mathematics,
because of the certainty and the absoluteness of its reasons; but I had not yet discovered its true
use... I was astonished that with such solid foundations nothing more eminent had ever been built
upon them" (Rene

Compare Montaigne And Rene Descartes
Moderator: It would be an understatement to call this an honor. Not one, but two of history's most
famous skeptics, Michel de Montaigne and René Descartes, have joined me to discuss the
relationship between self–knowledge and knowledge of the wider world. Let's jump right into the
heart of the matter: What is the most reliable source of self–knowledge?
Descartes: As you probably already know, my answer to this question is what I am most known for.
My method, which I detail in Discourse on Method, is to set aside all my presuppositions and focus
on what I know with complete certainty. After much meditation, I came to this conclusion: "I think,
therefore, I am." In other words, I know that I exist because I am a thinking being. To answer your
question directly, the most reliable source of self–knowledge, or any knowledge, is deductive
reasoning based on sure premises.
Montaigne: I agree that there are dangers to presuppositions. In The Apology for Raymond Sebond,
I explicitly call presumption humanity's "natural and original malady." However, I also believe that
unless your first principles are revealed by God, your reason is flawed.
Moderator: Would you expand on that, Montaigne? Why must premises be revealed by God and not
originate from within oneself, as Descartes seems to suggest?
Montaigne: Man is naturally flawed, so to find truth, he needs some outside power to instruct him.
As I write in The Apology for Raymond Sebond, "The participation that we have in the

In 1596 on the 31st of March in a town called La Haye, at that time, Rene Descartes was born. His
father was Joachim Descartes who was a lawyer that worked for most of his life as a member of
parliament. His mother was Jeanne Brochard who died the following year after Rene was born
during labor. Rene was the youngest of three siblings. Since his mother died while giving birth,
Rene and his siblings were raised by Jeanne Sain, his maternal grandmother. The family was what
would have been considered middle class. There were some doctors and some lawyers in the family.
Rene was considered a sickly, weak child for his age. In 1607 at the age of 10, he was attended a
boarding school in La Fleche which was a Jesuit College. During this time at the Catholic school,
Descartes learned the normal courses such as philosophy, grammar, and mathematical arts which
consisted of music, arithmetic, astronomy and geometry. He graduated in 1614; yet Descartes was
ambivalent toward the education he received, and similar to another great philosopher, Socrates, he
was felt as though he had no knowledge of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Five years later he completes Le Monde (The World). He suppresses publication after the church
condemns Galileo because many of Descartes' conclusions were identical to Galileo. "He was
convinced that what he had written in his treatise was correct, yet he also firmly believed in the God
of the church" (Stratthern 35). By June 1637 he published The Discourse on Method. This was to be
his most original work which included thoughts that changed mathematics. With this work, he
created the foundation of what we now term analytic geometry and introduced the idea of
coordinates. Leibniz later termed all of these findings Cartesian coordinate. Also during this time,
Descartes had a daughter, Francine. The child's mother, Helene, was a servant were Descartes lived
at the time. Regrettably when Francine was five she died in

Appraisal of René Descartes
In his works, Meditations on First Philosophy and The Passions of the Soul, René Descartes lays out
his views on the mind. Descartes is a dualist, specifically an interactionalist, which is someone who
believes that mental states and physical states are distinct from one another, yet still affect each
other. This view, however, faces significant obstacles, to which Descartes believes he has an answer
for. In this paper I will outline Descartes' argument for the distinctness between the mind and body,
explicate the problems his theory faces, and conclude that his dualist account cannot survive the
objections. In the Meditations, Descartes was concerned with finding certainty and he employed the
method of doubt in his quest. He ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The second, if such a thing can exist, then how can it causally interact with something that does take
up space and time?
For the first problem, Descartes thinks it can exist because he can simply imagine it to exist. That is,
his thoughts, his consciousness, his mental states seem to be able to exist wholly apart from the
body. He does not know how, or what it exist as other than a "thinking thing," but that does not
appear to matter to him.
His line of reasoning seems to be wrong though. More specifically, it does not seem to follow that
the ability to have a concept of one thing without reference to other makes it a distinct thing. I grant
that it makes it distinct in the manner that a brain is not a foot, or that the brain is not the whole
body, but Descartes went far beyond this by abandoning the physical realm and merely positing out
of nothing that a new substance must exist, the mind. A body is surely not a mind, but that does not
mean that they are not both physical entities. In trying to imagine something that does not exist as a
physical entity, it is complicated to see what the thing could exist as.
A further objection to his theory is based on a thought experiment. Imagine a person in a coma who
has no brain activity other than enough to keep the body functioning with necessary involuntary
actions, such as breathing, blood flow, etc. This person is documented during their

Rene Descartes: An Author Study Rene Descartes was a 17th Century mathematician and French
Philosopher whose life's work focused on providing a new prospective on the human perception of
reality. The definition of this reality is seen as Descartes greatest life goal. Coined as the "Father of
Modern Philosophy," (Cunningham & Reich, 2010, p. 385), Descartes laid the groundwork the
philosophy and reality as we perceive it today. Descartes autobiography, Discourse on the Method of
Rightly Conducting the Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences (Descartes, 2004) shares with the
reader a glimpse into the mind of a brilliant, yet frail, man who provided an in depth explanation on
the perception of human existence and the reality we live in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The act of doubt that one was thinking, proved humans are a "thinking being" (Cunningham &
Reich, 2010, p.395). Descartes argued that human perception may be inaccurate, so this cannot be a
message for determining what reality is. Descartes also proved the soul separate from the body. His
doubt led to believing in something greater than himself. Cunningham & Reich (2010) note that
Descartes main accomplished was by way of "refusing to believe anything that could not be
decisively proved to be true" (p.385). Descartes never married but had one child who died from
fever at age 5. He spent his later life in the Netherlands and then Sweden, where he died from
complications of pneumonia at age fifty three in 1650 ("René Descartes,"2014).
Summary: Discourse on Method Part IV The previous works in mathematics and science along with
philosophy of reason leads Rene Descartes to the process of self–doubt. This doubt lead to the
conclusion, as outlined in part IV of Discourse on Method, of the crux of Descartes fresh
perspective on philosophy of reason was found within his own imperfection is a human. The
questions relating to self–doubt and inspection of one's reality led Descartes to develop the
framework of modern philosophy. This infamous historical documentation of Descartes' thinking
and philosophical findings in the 17th century are still influencing our world today (Cunningham &
Reich, 2010). According to

The Meditations of Rene Descartes Essay
The Meditations of Rene Descartes
In 1916 Rene Descartes wrote "What I wish to finish is . . . an absolutely new science enabling one
to resolve all questions proposed on any order of continuos or discontinuous quantities." (p8
Methods & Meditations). He made this ambitious statement at the young age of twenty–three.
Rene's ambition would take him far but it kept him from becoming the Aristotle of the modern age.
The Meditations were an attempt to solve the many questions about life, existence, and God. At the
time of their publishing many philosophers did not quit accept his writings. Today however the
Meditations are widely read and reviewed throughout the world. In the First Meditation Rene begins
by stating that he know ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He would continue and urge us not to trust what we see because there is no way of being certain
about anything. Methodological doubt was his basis on life claiming that everything is to be
doubted. Rene Descartes first begins to come to some kind of belief by the Third Meditation. Rene
states . . . "I am certain that I am a thinking being; but do I not therefore likewise know what is
required to make me certain of something?" (p113 Methods & Meditations). He goes on to say that
God could not possibly be deceitful, it would not be his divine nature. This is when things start to
come together for Rene. After acknowledging that a divine God could not possibly be evil Rene
goes even further to say that he (God) must exist. This equation sounds strange but to this point
Rene never really considered if God even existed or if he was simply a part of his imagination.
Rene's motto, "De omnibus dubitandumest" (everything is to be doubted), lead him back to basic
proofs. His theory of analytical geometry was the first major contribution to the field of science.
This theory helped to offset some of his doubts and in many ways gave him the realization that some
qualities in life can be proven. For Descartes rule of everything to be doubted was only part of his
philosophical life. While taking this rule very serious he did not recommend it as a way of life.
Descartes was only interested in the study of wisdom. He knew that the wisdom learned would be a
sort of

Rene Cartes: The Wax Argument: Rene Descartes
Rene Descartes is the first modern French philosopher with his work La Géométri e from which we
know the Cartesian geometry. He was born in his grandmother's house. His father was Joachim
Descartes and his mother is Jeanne Brochard. His name Rene Descartes was named after his
grandfather named Rene Brochard. Rene Descartes was a Roman Catholic and was baptized at Saint
George in La Haye Church. His mother died after she gave birth to him. But, Rene's health was
quite unstable due to his tuberculosis, inherited from his mother. He studied at Jesuit college of La
Flèche in Anjou. He started college at Easter, at the age of eleven. He studied college with courses in
classics, logic and traditional Aristotelian philosophy. He learned mathematics ... Show more
Rene Descartes gets or precedes information on Aristotle's articles and philosophy which has been
dominating Western thinking, in Meditations. The Greek philosopher suggested that all our
knowledge, thought and even our wisdom comes from our 6 senses, but the true world outside us is
just like a mirror that ensembles our inner thoughts and actions. Rene Descartes gave strange and
rare examples of questions and even our thoughts if reality can really assume and resembles these.
Some or maybe many of his philosophy were inspired by the Great Aristotle. Due to his works that
he knew are prohibited to catholic churches, Rene Descartes was really a devoted catholic and as we
know a baptized Catholic. When Rene Descartes thought that some ideas are complement with his
thoughts on reasoning, he was so glad to borrow it from where he heard the ideas. And once, Rene
Descartes was considered as a relating to a great or complete change of figure especially when he is
trying to change the relationship between theology and philosophy, and form philosophy into new
forms of science. On his final work on the information of the body entitled "Description of the
Human Body" 1684. On the same year, he had a really long

René Descartes Treatise On Light
This short paper will summarize selections from René Descartes' The World also known as Treatise
on Light.
In Chapter One Descartes writes on light. He begins by pointing out that he believes that there may
be a difference in the sensations one perceives of light, and the object that causes that sensation.
Many people believe that the form of an object that one has in one's mind is the same or close to the
object itself, however, Descartes does not agree with this. He cannot find any reasons that shows
that this is the case, instead he finds observations that prove this is not the case. Descartes does raise
an interesting point, especially considering that our memories have proven to occasionally be
wrong, or glorified. Perhaps not only our memories are glorified, but our thoughts also. ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He explains that words are not the same of what they illustrate, for example, imaginary things.
Although words are not the same of what they illustrate, words still make one contemplate, often
without one thinking about it. René uses a second example, hearing. He demonstrates that when one
hears something, one can understand what the words were, however, one cannot always articulate
exactly explain what was said. Using these two examples Descartes moves into his main point: if
words can illustrate things to us that are completely different, then why can't nature express a sign of
something that gives us the sensation of

Rene Descartes Essay
Rene Descartes was a famous French mathematician, scientist and philosopher. He was arguably the
first major philosopher in the modern era to make a serious effort to defeat skepticism. His views
about knowledge and certainty, as well as his views about the relationship between mind and body
have been very influential over the last three centuries. Descartes was born at La Haye (now called
Descartes), and educated at the Jesuit College of La Flèche between 1606 and 1614. Descartes later
claimed that his education gave him little of substance and that only mathematics had given him
certain knowledge. In this lament he joins a chorus of seventeenth century philosophers including
Bacon, Hobbes and Locke. In 1618 he went to Holland to serve ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
So, the search was on for the method used by the ancient mathematicians to make their discoveries
(the method of analysis). Descartes is clearly convinced that the discovery of the proper method is
the key to scientific advance. For a more extended and detailed discussion of these methods, see
John Cottingham , The Rationalists, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1982. Chapter 2. In
November 1628 Descartes was in Paris, where he made himself famous in a confrontation with
Chandoux. Chandoux claimed that science could only be based on probablitiies. This view reflected
the dominance in French intellectual circles of Renaissance skepticism. This skptical view was
rooted in the religious crisis in Europe resulting from the Protestant Reformation and had been
deepened by the publication of the works of Sextus Empiricus and reflections on disagreements
between classical authors. It was strengthend again by considerations about the differences in
culture between New World cultures and that of Europe, and by the debates over the new
Copernican system. All of this had been eloquently formulated by Montaigne in his Apology for
Raymond Sebond and developed by his followers. Descartes attacked this view, claiming only that
certainty could serve as a basis for knowledge, and that he himself had a method for attaining such
certainty. In the same year Descartes moved to Holland where he remained with only brief
interruptions until 1649. In Holland Descartes produced

Rene Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy
Rene Descartes is one of the most known French philosophers among the world's known
philosophers. The most common phrase of Rene Descartes is "I think, therefore, I am" that is
universally known. He further says that human being use different reasoning in an attempt to have
the most equitable endowment and tackles a question on the most appropriate way that individuals
might use reasoning. In his book, Meditations on First Philosophy, Rene Descartes presents an
argument that opposes an individual's trust of senses. His works are appealing but to some extent is
a sense of oddity that is noticed. This paper will discuss Rene Descartes views on the sense of data,
what is appealing about his argument on the senses in relation to the actual meditations. Rene
Descartes established two main arguments towards meditation. His main aims in both meditations
were to show proof that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, there is a possibility that we are being deceived even in mathematical arguments of the
world's structure. Further in his argument, he Descartes introduces the aspect of demonic argument
that challenges the assumption that if God is not the originator of our senses, then we can assume
that there is an existence of an evil demon that has the same ability to deceive (Descartes, 1647).
The most fascinating part of the meditation argument by Descartes in his position of the mind being
known than the body. 'I think, therefore, I am" (Descartes, 1647) means that the existence of the
thought process in an individual is enough knowledge to prove existence, and the ability to exist as a
thinking thing. It is even more intriguing that he explains that an individual should be deceived
about their existence as a thinking thing. The oddity of this argument stands in the disbelief of any
knowledge that exists outside the

Rene Descartes Accomplishments
When I see the word philosophy, I see it as exercising one's mind which no one can visual see with
their own eyes. I only think they can feel with their soul. With this in mind, I think the personalistic
theory along with the scientific theory has Descartes using his achievements and contribution's
changed the viewpoint, the progress and redirected the course of philosophy that we still hold in
high standard today. If Rene Descartes would have not written some of his famous doctrines in the
various fields, such as mathematics and psychology, which would no doubt prove his intelligence,
his creative talents and his energetic quietness. The naturalistic theory reflects the person who makes
the times change in the outer circle around him, but keeps the inner circle his personalistic theory or
viewpoint. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One cannot work without the other. If Descartes inner circle grew faster than the outside circle – all
of the society on the outside would be effected by the intellectual radical changes in the fields of
math, philosophy or even psychology, the outer circle or naturalistic society would certainly punish
him or shun his theories as fast as the words came out. Descartes personal life played a dramatic and
drastic role simultaneously, he lived a very secret and dark world within himself, he was not in
strong health and preferred to sleep late in the morning, and while having these attributes which he
kept all his life, the gift of his creative thinking (mind) impacted his thought process the rest of his
days. Descartes life was that of pure and simple pleasures. He had lost the love of life, his daughter
Francine at the age of 5, which caused him to be inconsolable and would have a profound toll on his
mind and body. He became a recluse by moving so many times to have a strong desire for

Rene Descartes Causal Argument
The idea of God existence has always been a part the history of human. There are always been a
different point of view between those who believe in God and those who do not believe in God
existence. A French Philosopher, mathematician, and writer Rene Descartes was the one who clarify
the dilemma of the existence of God after he doubts everything. In fact, those who have faith in God
obviously tend to adhere at one religion. However, the skeptics try to search the answers of God
existence through scientific methods. Rene Descartes after doubting everything, he definitely
believes of the existence of God. As to proof God existence, Descartes develop several essential
arguments which are causal and ontological arguments. The logic of Descartes' ... Show more
But why he did not transmit his perfection to his creation? The reason of this question is because we
(human) do not understand how a perfect being can create an imperfect being. God, the perfect
being create humans who always tend to make mistakes despite the fact that Descartes says God
created humans without faculty of making mistakes. The philosopher Descartes clarifies this
confusion by stating that every mistake is an error of judgment. Consequently, it should be assign to
the will that judges, and human's error is not the fault of God. He claims that human's errors are
mere defect since human being has no infinite faculty of judgment. So, the extension of the will
boundaries than human understanding is the effective origin of human's errors. This is probably the
reason why Descartes states in Meditation Four, page 85 that the desire extends further than the
intelligence of humans. Base on the explanation above, humans are capable of making mistakes.
Descartes develop several essential arguments which are design, causal and ontological arguments
and base on Descartes demonstration, we can clearly state that causal argument as demonstrate
above is more objective than others. There is a perfect being who is God. This is obviously the proof
of the existence of God. And the perfection of God has nothing to do with human error because the
error of human is the extension of

Rene Descartes And Cartesian Dualism
In his Meditations, the 17th Century mathematician and philosopher Rene Descartes raised
arguments for the possibility of mind–body substance dualism, the belief that the mind and the body
are two separate and distinct entities. So closely associated with Descartes this argument became,
that it is now commonly referred to as Cartesian dualism. However, as many philosophers have
noted both during and following Descartes lifetime, Cartesian dualism raises what is known as the
'mind–body problem', which questions how the mind and body can causally interact. Many
philosophers have attempted to address this problem, either by rejecting dualism altogether for
monist views such as physicalism or idealism, or by maintaining that Cartesian dualism can be
compatible with mind–body interaction. This essay will address whether Cartesian dualism can
satisfactorily account the interaction between mind and body, and in doing so will analyse/critique
the responses offered by Descartes as well as contemporary substance dualists, whilst contrasting
these views with the monistic views which argue that there is no separation between mental and
physical states.
It is at first worth noting that Descartes was not the first to address the issue of dualism. Indeed,
dualist philosophy goes back at least as far as Plato, who argued that there was a distinction between
the ephemeral, corporeal physical body and the eternal, ethereal soul which Plato believed to inhabit
the body during life and continue to exist beyond death. Plato regarded the body, along with all
things which exist, to be an imperfect copy of what he called 'Forms', and that the existence of a
distinct soul was necessary to acquire innate knowledge. Plato's justification for his arguments seem
reasonable, he recognised that the senses could be deceptive and that for us to understand the real
world it must be through reason, therefore for us to acquire an understanding in the physical world it
would make sense that an immaterial part of us has a knowledge of the external forms. Plato's
dualism does have some significant flaws, mostly so is the fact that Plato's idea of a particular soul
being bound within a particular body is not sufficiently explained, how can an

René Descartes The Discourse On The Method
The Discourse on the Method was written and published by René Descartes in 1637. When you
place against this against the modern works of this era it still holds true. His position is that we are
essentially rational animals, and while we may differ with respect to our accidental properties, we
must all share the same essential properties. Since we are all equally human, then we must all be
equally rational. People may have different opinions but arrive at the truth with varying degrees of
success. Some people are better equipped with reasoning because many people apply their reason in
diverse ways. In part four of the Discourse on the Method, Descartes describes the results of his
meditations following the method he previously laid down. He

Rene Descartes and John Locke
Rene Descartes was a highly influential French philosopher, mathematician, scientist and writer.
Many elements of his philosophy have precedent in late Aristolelianism and earlier philosophers like
St. Augustine. Descartes was a major figure in 17th century continental rationalism, later advocated
by Baruch Spinoza and opposed by the empiricist school of thought consisting of Locke, Berkeley,
and Hume. His most famous statement is: Cogito ergo sum, translation in English I think therefore I
am.
Descartes employs a method called metaphysical doubt, sometimes also referred to as
methodological skepticism: he rejects any ideas that can be doubted, and then reestablishes them in
order to acquire a firm foundation for genuine knowledge. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Locke said at birth, the human mind is a sort of blank slate on which experience writes. Locke
claims that ideas are the materials of knowledge and all ideas come from experience. The term idea
stands for whatsoever is the object of the understanding, when a man thinks. Locke thinks we are
born with a bunch of faculties to receive abilities and to process the content once we gain it. For
example, the mind can engage in three different types of action in putting simple ideas together. The
first of these kinds of action is to combine them into complex ideas. Complex ideas are of two kinds,
ideas of substances and ideas of modes. Substances are independent existences. Beings that count as
substances include God, angels, humans, animals, plants and a variety of constructed things. Modes
are dependent existences. These include mathematical and moral ideas, and all the conventional
language of religion, politics and culture. The second action which the mind performs is the bringing
of two ideas, whether simple or complex, by one another so as to take a view of them at once,
without uniting them. This gives us our ideas of relations. The third act of the mind is the production
of our general ideas by abstraction from particulars, leaving out the particular circumstances of time
and place, which would limit the application of an idea to a particular individual. In addition to these
abilities, there are such faculties as memory which allow for the storing of

Rene Descartes And John Locke
"Rationalists thought that the mind was the source of true knowledge. Empiricists believed true
knowledge derived from the senses. Rene Descartes, a rationalist, and John Locke, an empiricist,
were prime examples of epistemologists who were seen to differ greatly within each of their
philosophies."
John Lock was an English empiricist philosopher. His beliefs on human knowledge, personal
identity, and consciousness were all based on the senses experience and reflection, like Aristotle.
Certainty was not a problem for Locke like it was for Gene Descartes. He explained this theory very
well in "Essay Concerning Human Understanding." Locke spoke of the mind. He believed
memories were the key to ones' self. He considered that the person was a forensic term. If a person
was accused of a crime and they were not aware or could not remember doing said offense, Locke
believed they shouldn't be held responsible. He thought if a person loses their memory, they become
a different person. He also believed that once the mind left the body, it just went into someone else.
Even sleeping can make us lose sight on our past selves since we are not conscious. Once a person's
memory is lost, Locke tells us the self has moved to a new body and your self is a new one You are a
new person. Locke theorized every time we fell asleep, we were not the same "thinking thing" but It
does not affect the personal identity of us.
Rene Descartes was a rationalist. He was considered the father of modern

Rene Descartes Accomplishments
Rene Descartes is the sole reason teenagers have to sit through fifteen days of mind corrosive and
non–existent scenarios that adults will likely never encounter. The lack of visual representations of
mathematical equations would prevent us from discovering and mass producing ninety–five percent
of retail. Descartes had a wealthy background in the spring starting off his life, given his family was
separated by death. He has portrayed ideas relating to the fundamentals of algebra and philosophy
that give and easier way of describing how mechanisms work. The world is in debt of the research
of Descartes' professions and without his work we would be in a divided, class based society. On
March, 31 1596 Descartes was born into the world in France. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This divided the masses into educated or physical workers and made scientists stick out in such
powerful verbal statements that couldn't be understood by the public and therefore distrusted. Rene
Descartes made this system exponentially better by giving visual representation of complex
mathematics. Without the coordinate planes dimensional modeling would be impossible to replicate
perfectly. This accomplishment allowed for businesses and corporations to form assembly lines and
revolutionize how architecture could be preplanned in scale. The world would be so different today,
that our progression to colonization in cities wouldn't function and millions of citizens would perish
under that clasps of natural disaster. Also further categories of biology became evolved through
ideas that Descartes had enough to make scientific work focused to finding out every living
organism is connected. Without this fact humans would have lived thinking we are the only
decisions that matter. Within similar ideas he also creates a link between the need for an omniscient
being. He created a fair amount of research that will allow any monotheistic religion to make
scientific theories prove god exists rather than disproves his existence. The philosophy that lead to
the possibility of today's accomplishments are greatly responsible and possible because of

A Brief Biography of Rene Descartes
The end of Renaissance science and the beginning of 'total mechanization of nature' era brought a
mentality different from what it was. There was a loss of spirituality and physicality and gain of
motion and increase of momentum. Theories of self were approached with regards that natural
objects were machines, and with such a notion brought the intrigue of how these 'machines'
operated. This concept, corpuscularism, catapulted a transition and divide within the natural world
with no intention or possibilities of reverting to past notions. The seventeenth century was a pivotal
point in history, which can be attributed by through works of philosopher Rene Descartes, who had
endorsed the mechanistic conception of the world and the human body by coining notions such as
mind, substance, and the knowledge argument; although his notions were not always accepted, he
managed to provide valid support.
Born in France, Rene Descartes, dubbed The Father of Modern Philosophy was, in a way, a
Renaissance man having contributed influence amongst subjects such science, mathematics,
psychology, and philosophy. Descartes was the medium of the philosophers before him, Michel de
Montaigne and Galileo Galilei. Descartes had sought to marginalize inquiry into skeptical
epistemology and human psychology like Montaigne, except in a scientific manner. He also
incorporated Galileo's innovation of subjectivity. By doing so, Descartes had exposed the scientific
irrelevance to soul by proposing that,

Rene Descartes Theory Of Skepticism
Rene Descartes is one of the world's best and most respected philosophers in history. In his time, he
presented two concluded with two arguments to question skepticism. Skepticism is the attitude of
doubting knowledge in any area. One idea being the argument of all existence being in an illusion or
dream–like world and nothing we are experiencing is real. The other theory is the idea that life is
manipulated by an evil demon that has an infinite amount of knowledge, and can even change basic
logic and mathematics. Both theories were created to challenge the definition of skepticism by
forcing you into believing in things that may or may not exist.
The theory of being in the illusion or in a dream is explained in Descartes writing in "Within the
Sphere of the Doubtful" that everything from physically to visually in a dream could not be created
in our minds if the object itself does not exist. Meaning that all the things we are dreaming about are
not imaginary but entirely real. Unlike a painting even when the artists study the representation for
most fantastic and extraordinary outcome. They cannot bestow nature's absolute, in reality they can
only try and get as close as they can to the real thing, or try to create something fictional that has
never been seen before, therefore being false or non–existent.
I do not agree or disagree with this theoretic sense it is true that a dream is based out of things we
have seen and experience and that it is an illusion in a different

From the various books he's written to the pension granted from the King of France, renowned
philosopher and mathematician René Descartes accomplished many extravagant achievements in his
lifetime. Descartes invented analytical geometry and established the foundation of skepticism as part
of the scientific method. René Descartes' contributions to the creation of the scientific method and
his various books on metaphysics and reason allow him to stand out, but Descartes' geometric
theorems and theories on existence and truth are what made him one of the most influential and
important philosopher and mathematicians in history.
René Descartes was born on March 31, 1596 to mother Jeanne Brochard and father Joachim
Descartes. René spent the beginning of his life ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was the youngest of his two siblings, Pierre and Anne. Unfortunately for Descartes, his mother,
Jeanne, died during the first year of René's life. His father, Joachim, was a council member in the
provincial parliament in France ("René Descartes", na). Although René planned to grow up in his
hometown, his father sent René and his two siblings to live with their grandparents for the
remainder of their adolescence. Later on, Rene's father specially requested that René be sent to a
boarding school at the Jesuit College of Henri IV in La Fléche, France at age eight. There, René
focused his attention on rhetoric and logic in mathematical arts, and had side interests in music,
astronomy, metaphysics, natural philosophy, and ethics. René attended the college until he was
fifteen years old. Descartes extended his studies

Rene Descartes Argument Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Ebony Bates

More from Ebony Bates (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Rene Descartes Argument Analysis