First Amendment Rights Pros And Cons

First Amendment Rights Pros And Cons
"First Amendment Rights allow us to do simple things that keep this country in check. But recently,
there have been court cases on people who are affected by laws that were wrote many years ago.
Over the years, the government has changed, the people have changed, and even the country. Along
with that, obviously laws have too. In order to keep up with developing technology, our laws might
have to bend a little.
To what extent in the U.S. does the governmentâ€"federal, state, and localâ€"have the duty to
monitor internet content? This is a question that many U.S citizens don't know the answer to.
Everyday, people around the country search up anything they want without censorship. If you were
warned that the government can see everything you search, would you browse what you usually do
ever again?
The government sees what you do on the internet, but what if, thatâ€™s not all. They have the
access to see your day–to–day life. They can track you, they can see your posts, and they can see
what you have done through the course of your life. When is all this taking their privilege too far?
They are on the verge of violating freedom of speech. Expressing in any way, your beliefs and
perspective, just canâ€™t be done anymore. Many ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
NSA. This is about AT&T clients who were unknowingly being tracked by the NSA. Thanks to the
Electronic Frontier Foundation, there is a lot of evidence pointing that the NSA is guilty. Although,
they are not the only ones who were supervising internet behaviors of people, big individuals have
also been found culpable. Due to this case, others have been warned not to do illegal things because
someone will be tracking it, and also it shows that you should not be the one tracking in this first
place either. The moral of this situation is to make sure your actions are not considered illegal,
because it is likely you will be caught in the crossfires of this controversial
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Argumentative Essay On First Amendment Rights
Part I – Intro: "An age is called Dark not because the light fails to shine, but because people refuse
to see it." (James A. Michener, Space) I am here today arguing a denied, avoided, and controversial
topic [Christian Persecution]; and, I am doing this so that I can make the increasing amount of
attacks on our first amendment rights known. The injustice here is not only the attacks on Christians'
rights to religious freedom, but also because it is ignored. The rights of everyone are compromised
because no matter what religion you identify with or even one at all, there is a precedent being set
that denying someone's right is okay. "1,400 documented attacks on religious freedom, at a 15%
increase over the past year and a 133% increase over the past five years." Part II – Introduce
arguments: This is an injustice for three main reasons: Number 1: Our first amendment right is being
violated. Number 2: People are penalized for their beliefs. Number 3: People are unable to practice
their religions freely. Part III – Reason 1: This is an injustice because our first amendment right is
being violated. The first amendment states that, "Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
government for a redress of grievances." Ironically, the majority of Americans identify as Christians,

Filmmaking : The Rights Of The Film And First Amendment...
Filmmaking is an increasingly popular form of creative expression, and with expression comes
offensive material. Because of this, films have a long history with governments all around the world.
In the United States, this presents a unique issue. One of our government's attributes that we are
most proud of is our right to free speech, granted to us by our first amendment. This means that
citizens can say whatever they would like about anything or anyone, including their federal, state,
and local governments, without fear of legal retaliation from those governments. This grants a
tremendous amount of power to the citizens, and as we all know, with great power comes great
responsibility. In the filmmaker's case, this responsibility, in the federal government's eyes, was to
create films suitable for all ages and mental capacities. Film producers had contrasting views, as one
might expect. Filmmakers believed that their work should be protected under the first amendment,
as it is a form of speech, but as Albosta says in his paper, "The Supreme Court has held that this
does not protect all forms of communication" (Albosta, 2009, p.122). Unfortunately for film, they
were originally excluded from the protection of the first amendment. Over the years the view on
first amendment rights regarding to film changed. The reasoning behind the exclusion of protection
was decided in a 1968 New York court case. The case decided the state did not act irrationally in the
withholding of a

Bill Of Rights: The First Ten Amendments Of The Constitution
The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments of the Constitution. It was written by James Madison
and other founding fathers as a result of calls from several states for greater protection for individual
rights. The Bill of Rights lists specific limitations on the government's power. It all started with the
conflict between Federalists and Antifederalists. Included in the Bill of Rights are significant laws
and freedoms, that have changed the perspective on rights over time. The strong conflict between
the Federalists and Anti Federalist was the spark that started the want for the Bill of Rights. The
Federalists were members of a political party that supported the Constitution and a strong
government. Some influential Federalists were James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton.
They thought the Constitution was supportive enough to help protect liberty and thought listing
particular rights was absurd. While the Anti–Federalists thought the opposite, they were in favor of
the Bill of Rights and adding the protection of very specific liberties. They believed it was the only
way to secure the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also, he thought a Bill of Rights would help protect minorities from being oppressed by majorities
and prevent the government from becoming too tyrannical. This shows the significance of the Bill of
Rights, now let's talk about some freedoms in the Bill of Rights. Some examples of rights citizens
wanted to be discussed were; having the right to bear arms, freedom of religion, speech, etc. Also
included was the government could not force a soldier to live with you. This right shows that so
many people hated the overruling of the tyrannical King of England, as he forced colonists to house
soldiers without permission. Pretty soon everyone's perspective on rights began to

The Freedom Of Freedom And The First Amendment Rights
Our founding fathers that is now long gone have fought for a future that they envisioned to be free.
The freedom to talk, freedom to express one self, freedom of religion and of the press and so on.
Drafted in their mind this beautiful picture that made America great, "Freedom". Freedom does not
only mean one who has been set free from bondage or gained independence but the right of many to
freely express themselves peacefully without intervention of any authority. Having freedom is like a
bird having the ability to fly with the mindset that the founding fathers planted a seed that was
watered by the happiness of the people and as outlined in the 1st Amendment, "Congress shall make
no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to
petition the government for a redress of grievances". "First Amendment." LII/Legal information
institute, 5 Feb. 2010, www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendemnt. As the years have gone
by, the First Amendment rights has been questioned because many have different views on how
freedom of speech, expression, religion and the press should be protected. On Feb 24, 1968, Tinker
Vs. Moines Independent community school district was a decision by the United States Supreme
Court that defined the constitutional rights of students in U.S. public schools. In this case, a group of
students decided to wear

Freedom Of Religion Is The First Amendment In The Bill Of...
"Freedom of religion or freedom of belief is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or
community, in public or private, to manifest religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and
observance. It also includes the freedom to change one's religion or belief." Freedom of religion is
considered an essential human right. In a country with an established religion, freedom of religion
generally means that the government allows religious practices besides the established religion, and
does not persecute you if you are not that religion. Freedom of Religion is the First Amendment in
the Bill of Rights. It allows us to think and express what we believe. But, around the world and in
the United States, this freedom is eroding. Churches, religious organizations, and individuals face
more and more restrictions as they express their beliefs or serve in society. Religious freedom is
important to a diverse society or community. It allows different faiths and beliefs to grow and
spread. Religious freedom protects the rights of all individuals, whether they are religious or not.
Religion has an important spot in society. To spread its positive message, a religious group needs
physical, social, and legal space to practice. All lawful ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
From verbal attacks to hostile feelings, attitudes and actions, Christians experience religious
persecution in areas with severe religious restrictions. On average, there are 322 people killed, 214
churches or religious buildings destroyed, and 772 other forms of violence performed against
Christians each month. According to The Pew Research Center, over 75% of the world's population
lives in areas with severe religious restrictions. Additionally, according to the United States
Department of State, people in more than sixty countries face persecution from their governments or
surrounding neighbors simply because of their

First Amendment and Right to Privacy
The First Amendment of the United States' Constitution, and the first right guaranteed by the Bill of
Rights, declares that there will be no law made "respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right
of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"
(First Amendment, n.d.). An individual's right to privacy is not guaranteed in the United States'
Constitution or the Bill of Rights, however, there have been amendments created that seek to protect
specific and private rights individuals. Even so, there are limitations to what type of freedoms are
protected under the First Amendment and to what extent an individual's privacy is protected. To
begin with, there are three types of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment: obscenity,
libel, and slander. Obscenity is "anything which depraves or corrupts minds open to immoral
influence" (Freedom of Speech, 2003). Despite the fact that the definition of obscenity has changed
throughout the years, Congress, in general, has reached a consensus in determining that obscenity
covers anything that is directed towards or involves youths, including child pornography. For
example, in 1949, the Supreme Court upheld, in Rosenberg v. Board of Education of City of New
York, that the Board of Education did not have the right to ban schools from carrying books such as
Oliver Twist and The

The Is A First Amendment Right For Newspapers?
In our world at this particular time people are overly sensitive to what is published in the media,
mainly about anything to do with religion. I believe that it is a first amendment right for newspapers
to publish cartoons even if it is viewed as offensive to a certain population. What is not acceptable is
the way it is handled by society. Things have been taken way out of proportion. It is unjust and goes
against the Constitution of the United States if anyone has to suppress their opinions just because it
might offend a community. In the event of the terrorist attack on the newspaper Charlie Hebdo,
instead of protesting or taking legal action some decided to kill innocent people to get revenge. It
was religion based and when they started killing all those people, it made what they stood for look
ludicrous. We are seeing this happen in our own country as well. I think about all of the shootings
that have been arising and about innocent lives being taken, most of which have occurred recently
because of a group of Islamists. This doesn't mean that every person who is involved with the
religion of Islam is that way, but it makes a lot of people skeptical and judgmental because that is
what the media highlights, focusing on the fact that it is indeed about religion. Persecution comes
with believing in something or just by being of a certain race. A person or group of people will
always be persecuted for what they believe in in one way or another, and this is something not a

Censorship Violates Our First Amendment Right
In the pursuit of education, students strive to learn and develop their understanding of the world that
surrounds them. Accordingly, it is the responsibility of the school administration to provide the
means to that end. Yet, there is a polarized divide among schools and their interpretation of freedom
of speech. This occurrence is experienced primarily at the university level but can be seen at all
levels of education. At the epicenter of this dispute is the notion of censorship, specifically whether
or not it is feasible to restrict what can and cannot be said by faculty and students alike. Advocates
of freedom of speech assert that censorship violates our First Amendment right, a liberty that is
inalienable. Proponents also argue that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In defense of Shurtz, the use of blackface falls within the realm of freedom of speech, as it does not
cause harm, but does create discomfort because if its historical significance. Garcia argues that
regardless of the intention of the user, the use of blackface is inherently racist because of its
historical context. The lack of knowledge as to why such actions are considered racist is more
detrimental than the action itself. However, the case of Nancy Shurtz is not a singular occurrence,
but a common American experience. Garcia describes Shurtz as a "symptom, and we make a grave,
possibly fatal error when we treat only the symptom and leave untreated the underlying malady"
(Garcia). Therefore, executing a quick suspension of Shurtz does not resolve the large issue at hand,
which must be dealt with in order to see significant progress within our society. Allowing academic
dialogues about controversial issues, such as racism and sexual violence, within our education
system is paramount because only through the understanding of other perspectives will we begin to
remedy the underlying disease that has plagued our nation since its inception. An increasing trend
among college campuses is the use of "safe spaces" and "trigger warnings." The term safe space
refers to an area where discriminatory and offensive notions are barred and a person can feel secure.
A trigger warning is a forewarning of content that could

What Is Violation Of Philip Malloy's First Amendment Rights
Would you believe me if I told you a child was suspended for humming the national anthem? In the
book Nothing but the Truth by Avi, that is exactly what happens to 9th grader Philip Malloy. Philip
Malloy's rights were violated because, he has the right to freedom of speech, he was suspended from
school and he has the right to express his patriotism and in the book he was not allowed to do these
things. Philip was asked to stop humming when the national anthem was being played. This violated
his first amendment rights because he was not allowed to express which is restricting his freedom of
speech and that is clearly against the first amendment. The first amendment is as follows: "...or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." (Cornell.edu)This means that nobody
can stop you from talking or expressing whenever you want and Philip was asked to stop talking
during the national anthem. This is why Philip's rights were violated ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Another example of this is when Tennessee high school student was suspended for saying bless you
because it was a classroom rule not to say bless you. (orlandosentinel.com)When she tried to defend
herself she was sent to the administrator's office for the rest of the day. Some people might say that
she broke a rule and should be suspended but I disagree. It shouldn't be a rule to start with. Saying
"bless you" if somebody sneezes is just being polite so you should not get suspended over

First Amendment Rights Debate
The capability to speak openly and practice the religion of your choice has existed since the birth of
the United States of America. Yet in the past decade, more people than ever have caused us to
question which first amendment right should be protected more; freedom of speech or freedom of
religion. Such events where the two rights are pinned against each other, both seeking to sense a
feeling of supremacy, have proved to lead to conflict and even bloodshed. The recent Muhammad
cartoon–drawing contest that took place in Garland, Texas is a prime example of the above
development of a rivalry. "The American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) sponsored the event
and their president and co–founder is Pamela Gellar (who is also the president of

Essay about First Amendment Rights, Privacy and the...
First Amendment Rights, Privacy and the Paparazzi
The question of paparazzi threatening privacy and First Amendment rights is often to situational to
argue in a conventional manner, but certainly there are many facets of the issue which can be
addressed in a quite straightforward manner. Celebrities who feel they have the right to privacy in
public places often muddy the waters of this issue. Oddly enough, those celebrities who have chosen
to speak out against what they feel are violations of their privacy most always begin their campaigns
with a large press conference. In other words, they gather together those people they wish to not
only suppress but also berate in hopes that these people will use their positions and skills to ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Their print journalist counterparts, who are afforded not only the luxury of editing, but also a few
column inches within which to develop their perception of the story fall into a different category all
together. A photojournalist must ascertain the defining image of a news event as it is happening and
capture it on film. If he or she is doing the job correctly, a reader can get a very good idea of what
happened without even reading the accompanying article. There is no luxury of editing in
photojournalism, the moment is either captured forever, or it isn't. If a fantastic shot is missed, it is
gone forever.
A good freelance photojournalist shoots what he or she knows. A good photojournalist also knows
what will sell. Some photographs really aren't worth taking from a newsworthiness standpoint, but if
a publication is willing to pay enough for them, than they will be taken. Sadly money does rule the
world, and until paparazzi photographers can feed their families without having to take these sorts of
pictures, they will continue to be taken.
It is obvious that one of two things is happening. Either the paparazzi does not threaten privacy and
First Amendment rights, or they do in such a way that the public does not care. The reason for this
goes back to the rich publications that ultimately drive paparazzi photographers to take these
pictures. These

First Amendment Rights In Schools
Students don't have the same First Amendment rights they have in the public compared to school.
Four major cases were brought to the Supreme Court concerning students' First Amendment, Tinker
, Fraser, Hazelwood, and Morse. The First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the government for a redress of grievances." Only one ruled in favor of the student that being the
first one, Tinker which set the stage for the rest. Students' First Amendment rights have changed
since Tinker expanded upon students' right to being constricted because ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I agree with the decision of Tinker because the protest did not interrupt the teachings of the school.
The the majority opinion agrees that if the students' First Amendment does not interrupt the
teachings of the school, it's okay. The dissenting opinion by Hugo Black says "The truth is that a
teacher of kindergarten, grammar school , or high school pupils no more carries into a school with
him a complete right to freedom of speech and expression that an anti–Catholic or anti–Semite
carries with him a complete freedom of speech and religion into a Catholic church or Jewish
synagogue". This argument doesn't work because both a place of religion and school have different
purposes. An anti–Catholic would interpret the teachings of a Catholic church. While all that Tinker
did was wear a black armband that caused no disturbance in the teachings of the school. The ruling
for Bethel v. Fraser is correct because Frasers use of sexual innuendo was to a crowd who was
unaware. The court ruled, saying "A high school assembly or classroom is no place for a sexually
explicit monologue directed towards an unsuspecting audience of teenage students". I agree with the
decision since the audience were not aware of what was going to happen as. Around 600 14 year
olds were present for the speech.

Apple Is A Violation Of Apple 's First Amendment Rights
Apple is currently going through the court system a lot these days; being one of the biggest tech
cases of 2016. The FBI and the U.S. government want to take over the control of the iPhone. They
want Apple to override the encryption feature to be allowed to crack the password. Currently, the
new features only allow the owner to crack the password. Apple is arguing that the request is a
violation of Apple's First Amendment rights. Apple can face some contractual issues which may
contribute to the problems they are currently facing. The first issue is that tech companies should not
be required to have an entry way into their products. How can a customer trust a company that does
not have their privacy as part of their contract? Customers value their privacy to the utmost fullest.
Apple believes that this will weaken the security of their computer systems and consumer's privacy
protection. Next, if you are a company that is viewed as being too vocal, it can jeopardize
government sales as well as relationships with law enforcement. Apple has noticed that many
companies often comply with the request, but that feels this again is a violation of their rights as a
company and the millions of customers they cover as a company. Will they ever be trusted? Will
they continue to have the same customers or lose to their competitors? Apple also makes a lot of
their money through advertising. Everyone wants to have the next and the new iPhone, but if Apple
has a bad

Rights Of The First Amendment
Rights of the First Amendment
Countless Americans today don't appreciate our nations bill of rights that our founding fathers
included into our nation's constitution protects our own rights. Of all the 10 amendments in the bill
of rights the 1st amendment protects our personal rights the most. The first amendment established
the right for all Americans to have the freedom of religion, speech, and the press. This amendment
essentially forbids the government from restricting an citizen from its own free exercise of religion,
impeding one's right of freedom of speech, and to restrict the freedoms of the press. In this essay I
will talk about why this amendment is so important to American citizens rights.
The first amendment is important in many

Student 's First Amendment Rights
Student's First Amendment Rights: Kindergarten Student Playing a Game If a student says, "I am
going to shoot you" during recess to his friends, does the school have a right to take disciplinary
actions? Is it a violation of the student's First Amendment? School officials can restrict speech
activities on any student in a school if it has been established there was harm or threats made against
others, including teachers. Although the First Amendment states freedom of expression, school
officials may punish students for expressing their personal views on school grounds. With the case
of S.G. v. Sayreville Board of Education [1], a school's right to discipline a student was questioned
by parental guardianship. The Case: S.G. v. Sayreville Board of Education (2003) Wilson
Elementary School in Sayreville, New Jersey, began disciplining a number of students for making
remarks of threat and acts of gun violence against teachers and students. Over the course of a week
(in early March 2000), three unrelated incidences occurred: one elementary student stated "I'm
going to shoot you" towards another student, a second student threatened to shoot a teacher with his
parent's gun, and a third student threatened to put a gun in a classmate's mouth to kill him. From the
time of the incidences and suspensions given to all the students involved, the principal, Georgia
Baumann addressed every class in regards to the severity of making threatening actions with a
weapon.

Freedom, Protected By The First Amendment In The Bill Of...
Freedom is a basic human right. We use it in every aspect of our lives. With family and friends, we
demonstrate our thoughts to each other about the world around us. Our privacy is shrinking because
of a trade off with security. More Security means everyone will be safer but it is not necessary to
subdue freedom because we are scared. The belief of freedom includes the choice of religion or
absence of it if you choose to do so. The rights and choices we make can go as far as we please, if
they do not impede another's right to be happy. Freedom is a natural right, protected by the First
Amendment in the Bill of Rights, that helps shape our everyday lives and is an American ideal.
While freedom is a worthy idea to fight for, it ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With increased security, we have lost a lot of our privacy. Security from our defense systems, such
as the military, NSA, CIA and other government agencies, protect us everyday by monitoring threats
and online activities. The security measures in place at public areas, such as full body scanners at
airports and metal detectors at courthouses and some schools, are all in place to protect the general
population. As a consequence of improved security we lose some of our privacy with the invasive
searches of our person and our belongings. One of the former president Barack Obama's last
executive orders gave intelligence agencies the ability to have weaker filter on the data from the
Internet. With less of a filter, more information can be collected about threats to the nation. "CIA,
FBI and other agencies will be able to access surveillance on foreigners abroad, including
information identifying Americans they may be in contact with" (Swaine). Our government has
gained the right to collect information of people with suspicious tendencies not in the United States.
This choice over freedom is not the way to go. Our goal as a nation is to keep its citizens safe. The
executive order gives more reasons for people that hate Americans to want to kill Americans.
Although our wings of freedom will spread farther over the earth, people do not like to

First Amendment Rights Research Paper
Well I would let others to express their political beliefs even if I didn't agree because the idea of first
amendments rights include freedom of speech, religion, and press which allows them to do so. But if
they are unconventional participation in actives they believe in them which can lead to violence,
civil disobedience, and vandalism. I think that's not expressing the first amendments rights because
you're breaking the law and doing things in a non–peaceful way. I would let other write petitions,
attend rallies, from groups, vote, and have protests if they are peaceful. I think that we as people are
not free to a certain extend we are somewhat free to express ourselves on what we may feel is right
or wrong. For example some employees at

The Importance Of The First Amendment Rights
I would need to say yes that obliging him to go to the meeting in which prayer to God is directed
abuses his First Amendment Rights. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution addresses
religion in two regards. To begin with, it restricts the government from establishing a national
religion. Opportunity from religious abuse is an essential motivation behind why numerous
foreigners resulted in moving to this country. Allowing individuals the flexibility to pick how, when,
and where to worship is a critical thought in this nation. Permitting people the freedom to choose
how, when, and where to worship is an important consideration in this country. Allowing others to
discriminate because of religion not only compromises this First Amendment right, it also promotes
the economic advantages of belonging to one religion (Moran, 2014). ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The First Amendment also promotes the freedom to associate. On the off chance that a man relates
socially just with individuals from his or her own religion, that is a secured decision. Be that as it
may, Employment is not social; it is financial. It is out of line for a business to pick its workers on
the premise of their religious inclination. How is this inclination work related? It is definitely not.
Employers should respect the rights of employees to worship as they please on their own time and,
if possible, should reasonably accommodate their employees to enable them to do so (Moran, 2014).
I would need to say that the business should have obliged Paul to go to the meeting for prayer to

First Amendment Of The Bill Of Rights
The first amendment of the Bill of Rights allows citizens to speak and express their views without
getting in trouble by the government who is elected. Since I live in America I never thought about
other countries not being able to question the government for fear of getting into serious trouble or
even fear of your life. But today we are protected and allowed to express that disagreement with
anyone no matter who they are or what they do for a living. Remember back in time when royalty
was ruled by most nations and the United States was ruled by Great Britain the colonists could not
gather or even think about gathering to discuss or disagree with rules and laws forced upon them by
the their ruler so with that being said they couldn't even

The 1st Amendment : The Rights Of The First Amendment
In the United States Constitution, the First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances" (Gold). Historically, as demonstrated in cases such as
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as the government in general, has well–
upheld this amendment, but starting sometime in the second half of the 20th century, they are slowly
embracing it less and less, as demonstrated in cases such as Texas v. Johnson. The recent hostility
towards the First Amendment demonstrates that its rights ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The ruling of Tinker. V. Des Moines is a good example of how well the Supreme Court used to
highly value First Amendment rights. In the early Supreme Court case, which happened in the
1960s, seven out of nine justices, the vast majority of the Supreme Court (Gold), voted in the
students' favor. This fits in with other early Supreme Court rulings, such as the 1940 court ruling in
Thornhill v. Alabama where they stated that First Amendment rights applied to picketers as long as
they did not cause property destruction or harm others (Gold), or the ruling in West Virginia v.
Barnette later in the 1940s in which the court stated that "students also had a right to express
themselves symbolically" (Gold). Early U.S. Supreme Court opinions supported Americans' right to
symbolic speech as long as it did not cause a "clear and present danger" to others (Gold), and the
fact that the aforementioned early rulings were in favor of this right supports this. How often the
Supreme Court voted in favor of the First Amendment in the era Tinker v. Des Moines took place
shows that they used to highly value First Amendment rights. In addition to demonstrating that the
Supreme Court used to be highly in favor of the First Amendment, Tinker v. Des Moines
demonstrates that the First Amendment does not harm anyone. According to the Supreme Court,
there was "no evidence whatever of petitioners' interference, actual or nascent, with the schools'
work or of collision with the rights of other

The First Amendment Rights
Our world is changing and so are our rights. The First Amendment, freedom of speech, is taking the
world by storm. Whether it be at sporting events or on college campuses, our First Amendment
rights must be upheld. College is meant to provide each student with knowledge; ensuring they
experience viewpoints from thousands of people, and taking away our First Amendment rights is
taking away our opportunity to learn and further our education. 2017 isn't the first time the First
Amendment has been brought up for debate on college campuses. Kent State is one of the most
violent and unconstitutional violations of First Amendment rights on a college campus. The spirited
young adults protesting the war at Kent State were not rebelling, they were only sharing the
knowledge they valued deeply. "Students were killed and nine injured when members of the Ohio
National Guard opened fire during a demonstration protesting the Vietnam War." (Rosenberg). The
students protesting the Vietnam war were giving others the opportunity to see something from a
different perspective; this is the goal for liberal education. These student's ideas were suppressed and
limited because they were not popular ideas. The goal of getting a higher education is to expand
your thoughts and experience different beliefs. Not only were lives taken this day, but opportunities
to learn and change the world. The Kent State students were only trying to help others understand
their antiwar convictions. Taking away these

The Freedom Of Rights In The First Amendment
The rights protected in the First Amendment are essential to the functioning of a free society in that
they provide the means through which the ideas outlined in the Declaration of Independence are
fulfilled. In the First Amendment, the power of Congress is limited by prohibiting the creation of
laws regarding the establishment or restriction of religion, and the abridgement of the freedom of
speech, of press, to peaceably assemble, or to petition the government. Without these fundamental
rights, the voice of minorities would be silenced and societal development would not occur.
Eighteenth century Americans considered freedom of religion to be an essential right that protected
both church and state. Many colonists came to America to escape religious persecution, and believed
religion helped to develop individual character. The establishment and free exercise clauses help
develop the character of individuals needed to maintain a free society. Moreover, freedom of speech
allows people to compare and discuss their ideas regarding ethics, politics, morals, and public
issues; as English philosopher and political economist John Stuart Mill stated, progress can occur
only when all points of view can be expressed and considered. In a free society, the policies of
government are determined by the will of the people, so the people must be well informed.
Additionally, the freedom of speech, and the right to assemble, petition, and associate guaranteed in
the First Amendment are

The First Amendment Right To Freedom Of Social Media
Social media. People's daily lives revolve around social media sites such as Twitter, Instagram, and
Youtube; the growing number of social media sites and users has increased the likeliness of these
social media sites being used as news sources. Protecting the freedom of speech on social media will
spread important worldwide news like wildfire, informing users of social media sites about current
events quickly and expands the knowledge people have on situations happening in different
countries that can't be or aren't reported by news reporters. Social media takes up a considerable
portion of people's lives. A myriad of people use social media; this makes news stories and articles
on social media sites are a convenient way for people to obtain information about current events
happening around the world. The author of Journalism and the Digital Revolution states, "Facebook,
Twitter, and Pinterest have become integral parts of the reporting process and vital connections ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mary Harvey, the author of The Role of the News Media, states, "The growth of cable TV, 24–hour
news, and Internet blogs has pushed mainstream reporters to be even quicker in breaking stories.
This can lead to the publishing or airing of stories without their facts being thoroughly checked"
(par. 19). This explains that since anybody can access the Internet and social media, data and
information can be released to the public without any research being performed beforehand;
resulting in rumors and fallacious statements spreading like wildfire on the Internet. However, my
claim of social media being fully protected by the First Amendment right to freedom of the press
still holds strong; although speculations and false ideas may surface on the web, there are enough
people on the Internet and social media that express opposing ideas that inaccurate information is

The Bill Of Rights: The First Ten Amendments
The Bill of Rights is the accumulation of the first ten amendments made to the United States
Constitution. Before ratifying the Constitution, some states required that a Bill of Rights be
instituted. James Madison, the primary author of these amendments and later America's fourth
President, drafted twelve revisions. Congress passed ten of the proposed amendments, creating the
Bill of Rights. While these revisions did create new guidelines for the Constitution, they did not
change the original intentions of the framers. The first ten amendments protect citizens' rights and
powers. The First Amendment gives people the right to express their opinions and beliefs without
fear of government opposition. This not only allowed the immigrants

Essay On First Amendment Rights
First Amendment rights are like an antique; they have been around for a while, and people will
treasure them for years to come. Americans have valued First Amendment rights since the
constitution was written, and still do to this day. As well as valuing them, Americans are also willing
to fight for their rights; whether it is by going to court, picketing, or protesting. As a result of this
willingness to fight, we have seen many court cases and protests about First Amendment rights, and
will likely continue to see these for a long time.
When you hear the phrase "The First Amendment," what do you think of? Most people would
answer with freedom of speech. According to the First Amendment Center, "The majority of people
[who were surveyed] named ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many recent court cases have emerged involving people fighting for these rights, including some
controversial ones. For example, the ruling of the Snyder v. Phelps case has been debated over by
many, and most agree with the dissenting opinion of the court. Snyder v. Phelps questioned whether
members of the Westboro Baptist Church were allowed to hold up rude and offensive signs near a
fallen soldier's funeral. The court ruled that while it was offensive, the Westboro Baptist Church
were allowed to picket the funeral because it was "a subject of general interest and of value and
concern to the public" (casebriefsummary.org). The family of the soldier was upset with this ruling,
because they felt it was unfair. However, the First Amendment protects acts that may be considered
offensive. Similarly, there was another recent case that had to do with picketing and protesting. This
case was called Matter of Waller v New York, which involved the protesters of the Occupy Wall
Street Movement. However, this case, like the Hazelwood case, is an example of First Amendment
rights being limited. The court ruled that the protesters were not protected under the First
Amendment in this case, because they could be compromising the health and safety of those in
Zuccotti Park. Another recent mention of First Amendment rights came from President Barack

First Amendment Rights Case Study
Monday was a day that first amendment rights were tested at The University of Missouri. On the
University of Missouri a group of protesters camped out, and like any good journalist, Tim Tai and
another student reporter took on the case. Melissa Click, an assistant professor in the
communications department was captured in video on Monday saying, "Who wants to help me get
this reporter out of here? I need some muscle over here." She directed this at Mark Schierbecker.
After this Schierbecker is heard saying, "This is a public property." Responding to this Click says,
"Yeah, I know, that's a really good one; I'm a communication faculty, and I really get that argument.
But you need to go. You need to go. You need to go." (NBC) Tim Tai was then seen arguing with
Click. The journalism department said this, "We applaud student journalists who were working in a
very trying atmosphere to report a significant story. Intimidation is never an acceptable form of
communication." This shows that what Click did was perceived as wrong and should not have been
said. (Washington Post) ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The group of student protesters did not put up a sign saying that media was not aloud, and nothing
said that the media couldn't be there. The journalists had the first amendment right to take pictures
and report on the story. The first amendment protects the freedom of press and should be enforced.
Click, as a communications director, should know that.
Protesters then blocked Tai's view and argued with him, eventually pushing him away. At one point,
they started a chant saying, "Hey hey, ho ho, reporters have got to go."
"I am documenting this for a national news organization," Mr. Tai told the protesters, adding that
"the First Amendment protects your right to be here and mine." The protesters then called him
unethical. "What is so hard about respecting our wishes?" one protester

A Good Example Of Mr. Johnson's First Amendment Rights
In the year 1984–1989 there was a case that struck America and shows a very good example to
having your first amendment rights, not everyone will necessarily agree with this but this is how Mr.
Johnson took his actions against the supreme court. This case is based on Mr. Johnson feeling
violated against his first amendment right and standing up for himself and burning the American
flag. Many patriotic people would completely disagree with this but, in our first amendment we
have the freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Leading Mr. Johnson to this case because
the American flag is supposed to represent our country and our freedom. "Gregory Lee Johnson
burned an American flag outside of the convention center where the 1984 Republican National
Convention was being held in Dallas, Texas. Johnson burned the flag to protest the policies of
President Ronald Reagan. He was arrested and charged with violating a Texas statute that prevented
the desecration of a venerated object, including the American flag, if such action were likely to
incite anger in others. A Texas court tried and convicted Johnson. He appealed, arguing that his
actions were "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment." Based off this case with this
evidence this shows how much this could affect Mr. Johnson and the public significantly. Mr.
Johnson born ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
" The American flag remains a living piece of history and a source of pride and unity for all
Americans. The Stars and Stripes embodies the very qualities that make our nation great: liberty,
justice, freedom, love of country and national purpose." and once again just stated here this shows
how important the flag means to every single American citizen in every form of our first

The First Amendment: Right To American People
Introduction w/ proofreading The First Amendment has been a right to the American people. The
First Amendment includes freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and
freedom of speech. Freedom of speech has an important place in American democracy and
American government. As a result, certain protections are put in place to make sure constitutional
rights are protected. Some types of speech are more protected than others. Pure speech is more
protected than speech plus conduct. The branch of American government that is responsible for
analyzing and interpreting the laws and the United States Constitution that affects freedom of speech
is the United States Supreme Court. The City of Rushmore passed the following ordinance,

Freedom Of Expression
What is art? Can it be defined in any single painting, or sculpture? Is it even something that can be
seen, or does it have to be experienced? The term "art" is so vague that it can be applied
to almost anything, really. Mostly, however, art should be that which frees our imagination. It
connects our conscious with our subconscious, putting into a visual form what we feel and think. It
allows us to explore our inner self and fill that urge to understand our minds and our universe. Art
helps us to see beyond the ordinary, to see what is in our hearts without being blinded by reality.
When an artist creates a painting, it is not to create a picture; it is to create a feeling or mood. The
purpose is to convey an emotion, and, it is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At that time, Mayor Rudolph Guiliani, after having viewed the exhibit, threatened to withdraw city
financial support to the museum.
The Mayor labeled the exhibit "sick" and "offensive to Catholics", and
made no secret that his objections were based on his personal dislike of the contents of the show. He
criticized the work of Chris Ofili, specifically a painting called The Holy Virgin Mary, because of its
use of elephant dung. Ofili, a British artist of Nigerian descent, uses elephant dung in many of his
works as a reference to his African roots. As an observant Catholic himself, he denies that his work
is either anti–Catholic or anti–religious. He meant the dung to be a symbol of life and providence,
however this simple explanation was not enough to satisfy Guilani. His threats to withdraw funding
stood firm. Offili told the New York Times, "The people who are attacking this painting are
attacking their own interpretation, not mine." Damien Hirst, whose display was also part of
the show, said that the mayor "may as well say, 'I only like Picasso and if you don't show it
then I'm going to cut your funding.' It's just pure censorship." He may be right, and the
Brooklyn Museum of Art sued the city on September 28th, protesting the mayor's threat to freeze
millions of dollars in funds.
To the relief of museum officials and art lovers across the country, the courts ruled on November 1st
in favor of the Brooklyn Museum of Art and

The Importance Of First Amendment Rights In Schools
First amendmendment 0f the constitution give people the freedom of speech, however when it
comes to the school ground things get complicated, over time.the supreme court has passed laws
that change student first amendment rights, expanding then restricting them. because of students
fighting and suing their school when they feel that their 1st amendment rights have been violated by
the school administration, student first amendment rights have changed. Tinker V. Des is considered
a landmark case in student rights. with the ruling of the court student's right of speech was
established as something schools could not take away. In 1969 the vietnam war was still going on
and while it was the year the first american troop withdrawal took place, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
By restricting what students can say, publish on school news article, or put on a sign during a school
event, the supreme court has been slowly limiting the 1st amendment rights of students. As a student
myself, i believe that the supreme court has been right in their decisions, and in limiting student
rights. while some people might say the court is wrong, in limiting the freedom and 1st amendment
rights of students. what the court did was, allow schools to punish students for using vulgar
language during school events, and stop students from posting inappropriate things in school papers.
While these might limit student rights, it helps keep the school environment disciplined. in
conclusion student rights over time have been expanded but after the first big expansion, they have
been restricted, but with good reason. in order to keep a disciplined and a good learning
environment, it is important to restrict those rights. Student rights have been changed by the
supreme court, for the purpose of having a more democratic and free nation, but those rights have
also been restricted for keeping a safe and good learning environment for students of all

Should The First Amendment Right? Be Protected At All Times?
In the Denver Posts editorial "Putting up with Hate", the first amendment right of Americans is
seriously discussed. A case over funeral protesting reached the Supreme Court. The issue was that a
church group traveled to a funeral of a deceased soldier to protest it. The reasons were not because
of the soldiers individual actions but because he had served in the army. This sparked the debate on
whether this group should be allowed to do what they did. The dispute was whether the first
amendment should be protected at all times even when it is a difficult price to pay. The Supreme
Court ruled that the first amendment right will be protected at all times. The argument against that
was if the speech caused sorrow, it should be ruled illegal. The Supreme Court stated that if they
were to stifle the speech of the protesters that it would spark public debate on many other things.
The Denver Post also states that the Supreme Court ruled that the protestors obeyed police laws
which is staying at least 1,000 feet away from feet from the sight of the funeral. The Denver Post
stands behind the decisions of the Supreme Court to keep the rights of American Citizens protected.
Although they used words to describe the activities in a negative way, they still proceeded to support
to the Supreme Court. Toward the end of the editorial, the Denver Post states that they liked the way
the community had come together to protest the protesters. The community chose to create a barrier
of people

Public Safety Outweigh Petitioner 's First Amendment Right
C. The interest of public safety outweighs Petitioner's First Amendment right to record.
Petitioner's recording posed an unreasonable risk to bystanders, passing motorist, and the police,
essentially creating an inherently dangerous situation. Kelly v. Borough of Carlisle, 622 F.3d 248,
262 (3d Cir. 2010). The Third Circuit has firmly recognized that traffic stops are especially fraught
with danger to police officers. Id. A traffic stop always poses danger because of its unpredictable
nature, but even more so, when a potential suspect is on the loose. Petitioner was a suspect for a
crime of several residential break–ins, which a reasonable office would assume is armed and
dangerous; thus creating a heightened risk to the officers' safety. Furthermore, the Petitioner was
stopped on the side of a road congested with traffic. If the officers do not maintain control of the
situation, any unpredictable movement could result in grave injury; therefore, the police officers
acted reasonably by minimizing the unnecessary danger added by Petitioner's recording during an
already dangerous situation.
D. Petitioner's recording is not a matter of public interest that carried any expressive or
communicative purpose.
The encounter Petitioner recorded is not a matter of public interest. Although there is a broad First
Amendment right to film matters of public interest, the extend of that right to film public officials
have not been explicitly defined by the Supreme Court or any other

Free Speech, First Amendment Rights And ' Terroristic '...
I 've selected the article because for several reasons: it 's importance in the context of this class, and
the First Amendment rights of the defendants. Second, my final paper topic was "Free Speech, First
Amendment Rights and 'Terroristic ' Messages". I 've used the article in my paper and presentation,
as well I 've particularly valued the case of Tarek Mehanna, 2012 while giving the examples for the
Free speech rights and its protection in case of use and distribution of ' Terroristic ' Messages '.
Finally, This topic is up to date and is one of the hottest topics on political, social and even financial
stage not only withing the US but worldwide, due to the Islamic terrorism spread. This topic is
crucial to understand the basis of terrorism and related possible charges, for someone who is not
aware of " ' Terroristic ' Messages ' charges. It may help to understand, that terroristic speech is not
protected under the First Amendment, and in particular that to be considered as ' Terroristic '
Messages ', the message might not only be verbal, but symbolic, or as a support for terrorists (
financial, moral, distributed in any type of medias). One can be considered as a terrorist supporter,
without even ever meeting terrorists and speaking with them. In the era of the social media, and
Internet, it 's dangerous without being a supporter to consult the forbidden, and running by terrorist
web– pages, because, one can be considered liable and accused. Consequently, the

Essay on Book Banning and First Amendment Right
What is a banned book? A banned book is a book that has been removed from the shelves; it could
be from a library, classroom, or even the bookstore because of its content. A book could be banned
for many reasons, but it could be banned because it contains sex, violence, inappropriate language,
religious viewpoints, witch craft, and many more things because other people deem it inappropriate.
When someone bans a book they ban it for everyone else too. The First Amendment states that
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When violences occurred between them, Cyril told the Jews to leave. The last great scholar Hypatia,
refused and was then murdered on Cyril orders and then burned the Great Library of Alexandria
down. It is said that their had to be some remains of the Library still existing
The burning of the Great Alexandria Library, maybe a mistake destroyed over 700, 000 scrolls.
Many of these scrolls were the only copies and the information they held are lost forever (Heather
Phillips p.4–6).
Even the Catholic Church supported censorship, in the seventieth century they wanted to censor
Galileo because he believed that they church was wrong about the planets revolving around Earth.
He believe that the sun was in the center and all of the plants revolved around it and they made him
burn all of his writings. As United States citizens, we have the right of freedom of expression; the
First Amendment of the United States constitution states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or the press..." (First Amendment Oct. 20, 2013). As this concerns books, people should
have the freedom to choose what they want to read and what they don't want to read. By banning
books, our basic rights as US citizens are abused. Book banning affects many different people, from
the people who read books to the people who write them. Why do

Bill Of Rights: The First Ten Amendments In The United States
The Bill of Rights were ratified on December 15, 1791. The Bill of Rights is the first 10
amendments in the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution was the basic human
rights of America's citizens as well as the foundation (or basic) laws for the citizens to follow. There
were many people who were for and against the whole "freedom" from Britain, Federalists and
Anti–federalists. Alexander Hamilton was a Federalist, he did not agree that the Bill of Rights was
something that America needed. Alexander Hamilton believed that the president should serve for his
lifetime, and he should have the final "say" in everything. The eighth amendment is my personal
favorite, so with that in mind, that will be the amendment that I will be discussing. The eighth
amendment states that, "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel
and unusual punishments inflicted." What this means is that the amount of bail money cannot be
extreme. (The bail has to be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I disagree with Hamilton strongly, especially with the eighth amendment, because, during this time
period (late 1700s to early 1800s) there was a lot of discrimination against religions, race, and
political standpoint. Since a mass amount of discrimination occurred, the amount of mistreatment
before the Bill of Rights was outrageous, African Americans were hung because of stealing a potato
they planted, Loyalists were punished through 'Tar and Feathering'. I personally disagree with
Hamilton because the Bill of Rights were needed and still are (however, not necessarily enforced)
because of the inequality that society sees. It was much worse back then, as a minority (Hispanic
and a women) I even get discriminated against. These laws are valid and they need to continuously
be

First Amendment Right To Wield His Banner Essay
Did Frederick have a First Amendment right to wield his banner, and was Principal Morse in the
right to confiscate his banner? After reviewing the facts of the case, it is without a doubt that Morse
is innocent, of any violations of Frederick's First Amendment rights and she had every right to
confiscate and punish Frederick for his actions. Joseph Frederick, a senior at Juneau–Douglas High
School, attended the school approved and school monitored social event of the Olympic Torch
Relay. Frederick was late to school that day, and upon arrival, he joined his friends (all but one were
students at JDHS) across the street from the school to watch the event. He and his friends unfurled a
14–foot banner with the phrase, "BONG HITS 4 JESUS" Upon ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This banner to some could be seen as offensive, and Morse has the choice to either take action, or to
allow this banner and face consequences. She chose to take action, and uphold the school's policy.
Fredericks banner violated the school's policy. It promoted the use of illegal drugs, and although
Frederick arrived late to school, he still arrived at a school event, monitored by school officials, who
in turn were in charge of him. Schools have the right to confiscate any item that violates their
policies, and Frederick's displaying of his banner was violating a policy. Although Frederick does
have the First Amendment right to wield his banner, the school policy clearly states that nothing
promoting illegal drugs is allowed. If Frederick was attending an event not approved or monitored
by the school, he would have been free to display whatever he wished. Just because Frederick had
the first Amendment right, schools do not have to tolerate any actions or expressions that could
contribute to any dangers of their students, such as illegal drug use. In conclusion, Principal Morse
had the right to take away Frederick's banner, and is innocent of any violation of Frederick's First
Amendment

Voting: The First Amendment In The Bill Of Rights
Voting is an essential right that has been given to citizens since it allows the society to become as
close as it could to an ideal democracy – a nation governed by its people. Some people think that
voting is the most important right of all. "The right to vote is the most basic right, without which all
others are meaningless, American president Lyndon Johnson once said. By means of voting,
individuals have a direct say in different social and political issues. Voting is crucial to the validity
of the U.S. Constitution as well: the first amendment in the Bill of Rights calls for freedom of
expression. Being able to vote allows citizens to express their political opinions by voting for a
policy or candidate that has their best

First Amendment Rights In School
Students have every right to express themselves in school and are protected by the Constitution.
That right is regulated by the disruption on campus that their expression may cause. The students
First Amendment rights will not be violated if the school doesn't allow the shirts. The school has
every right to ensure that their students and faculty are learning and working in a safe environment.
School officials have the task of developing, executing and enforcing both rules and regulations
within a school. This is necessary to establish order and discipline within the environment. The
administration felt like the students form of expression would be too dangerous to the safety of their
campus. Case Law referencing First Amendment

First Amendment Rights Pros And Cons

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Diane Allen

More from Diane Allen (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

First Amendment Rights Pros And Cons