Revolt Of 1857

Revolt of 1857
The First War of Indian Independence or The Great Revolt of 1857: The Indian soldiers in the East
India Company's army rebelled against the British in 1857. The English historians have painted this
revolt as a mutiny of the sepoys. But the Indian historians describe it as the First war of Indian
Independence. It is also known as the Great Revolt of 1857. Lord Canning was the Governor–
General of India at that time. The causes of the Great Revolt were many. They may be classified as
political, administrative, economic, social, religious, military and immediate causes. 1. Political
Causes : The annexation policy of British was one of the major causes. The terms of the Subsidiary
treaties signed by Wellesley with different rulers were ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Measures like the suppression of Sati and female infanticide, remarriage of widows and the right of
inheritance to Christian converts offended the Indian orthodox sentiments. 5. Religious Causes : The
Christian missionaries were active in propagating Christianity. These activities created a sense of
fear in the minds of the Indians. They suspected that the British were out to destroy their religions
and convert India into a Christian land. This declaration created a great anger and disbelief against
the British rule. Religious sentiments were aroused when the British imposed taxes on the lands
belonging to temples and mosques. The priests and the maulvis showed their discontent against the
British rule. All these activities made the British unpopular. 6. Military Causes : The Indian soldiers
were called the Sepoys. They constituted the majority of the British army in India. In fact, the sword
of the British power rested on the loyalty and strength of these Indian Sepoys. But they were treated
with contempt and made to feel inferior by the British. They were paid less than their British
counterparts. The Indian sepoys had no chance of promotion in the army. They were prohibited from
their traditional religious practices like wearing a saffron mark on their forehead, growing beard and
wearing turbans. Lord Cannings' Government passed in 1856, "The General
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Analysis Of Vox Clamantis
John Gower
Born on 1330, Kent, United Kingdom, John Gower was an English poet who was friends with
Chaucer and the connection between him influence his writings during his era. John Gower writings
during the 16th century began to diminished ever since he is interest was picking up, but in the 20th
century many people see how insight his poems are. The language that Gower expresses is seen as a
Kentish Origin, his family who raised him came from a place called Yorkshire. And that it has been
said that they known to have opulence amount of money.
The research work Gower has formulated was in French, English, and Latin they were seen as one
of his vital works. What are comprised in these works are "The Speculum meditantis" which is ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The theme in this is essentially about morality even that John Gowers poems has a sense of
unethical perspectives that is being presented.
It contains over 40,000 octosyllabic lines and over a 100 parts in the series. Even though that other
authors assumes that his tales are not taking in account it's still in a way that is presentable. Thus it
gives little to no imagination or no vivid ideas and that the influence of Chaucer aided his
endeavors. The stories that John Gower has represented has been note as "Classical, Medieval, and
it's narrated in a fashion of details that simplifies the story that intrigues the reader. Moreover, John
Gower had a relationship with his fellow poet, Geoffrey Chaucer he was a major character in the
book called "Burnable Book". The book illustrates about the relationship between the two and that
the two men relationship were close. One of Gowers flaw of his life is inability to see, it led him to
be at a disadvantage, but he is rich in literacy which made him continue promoting his philosophies.
Before doing all this work, he first worked on his first poem named "Miroir de l'Omme, or speculum
meditantis. What's in this is about sin that is developing over time and that there are certain
responsibilities when person the is deciding something that you're about to praise to. In his poem it
contains well over 28,603 lines, he construct it in a 12–line stanza of

Revolt Response And Atheism
In an ideal world, an authentic person would always choose to revolt against an existential crisis.
When it comes to the three reactions that an individual can have in response to an existential crisis, I
believe that revolting is one that is commonly used today. To revolt is to take in ones situation
entirely for what it is. Unlike the other two reactions which are to escape and commit suicide,
revolting arguably shows the greatest sign of strength. When one revolts, they do not succumb to
thoughts of suicide nor hope to escape their current situation by traveling to a better time in their
life. They are completely mindful of their situation. With this being said, I cannot help but draw
connections between the revolt response and atheism.

The Pueblo Revolt of 1680 Essay
The Pueblo Revolt of 1680
All through the history of the world there have been superior civilizations that have taken over other
groups and have forced them in to situations that would seem unimaginable to the most people
today. The same situation once happened to the native people that live in what today is considered
the south west of the United States. In 1550 Francisco Vásquez de Coronado led a Spanish conquest
in the Rio Grande valley the area that a number of pueblo people made this area there home and
sacred lands. With Coronado eading the way the gate was opened to the rest of the Spaniard who
were looking for their share of fame and riches. After Coronado fruitless search of the seven cities of
gold, then Juan de Oñate ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As the same happened the of the pueblo revolt of 1680. The entire thing that the historian's point out
the there are a great deal of circumstances that would make the pueblos revolt. Henry Warner
Bowden argues that religion what the primary cause for he pueblos to unite and over throw the
Spaniard regime of the southwest. Historian Ramon A. Gutierrez points out that it was the skillful
Franciscans who where at first ale to manipulate the Pueblos in to taking the new religion, but after
time the pueblos lost interest and where no longer amused by the new religion that was forced upon
them. According to Van Hasting Garner the reason that the pueblos took up arm is due the
immediate events that happened in that era for example; drought, famine and the apache raids of the
1670's. New Mexican priest Angelico Chaves points out that the reason for the pueblo revolt of 1680
that the actions of Doming Naranjo, a mixed Indian created a stir united the pueblos and created the
Revolt. The last argument in the book made by Andrew L. Knaut is the reason for the pueblos revolt
of 1680 is that It was just the right time since the pueblos had been resentful towards the Spaniard
and with in time the Spaniards lost their ability to keep the pueblos intimidated.
The argument that I agree most with is that

The Rising Of The Decembrist Russia
The rising of the Decembrist Russia was due to a confusion over the next succession. In 1825,
Alexander I died suddenly. Alexander 's younger brother, Constantine, who was next in line, had no
desire to assume the throne of such a burdensome empire, so he gave his right of succession to his
brother Nicholas. Nicholas, however, had been left unaware of the official details of the change and
on learning of Alexander 's death he proclaimed Constantine emperor at St. Petersburg, at the same
time as Constantine in Warsaw was proclaiming Nicholas. For nearly three weeks in December 1825
the throne remained vacant. Russian officers and troops had come into contact with currents of
liberal thought, with new social conditions, and with new political institutions in western Europe
during the struggle against Napoleon. Upon their return home they saw that the idea of the rights of
man was regarded with contempt by their rulers, that their country by trodden under the heel of an
autocracy which made all progress impossible. As they had no legitimate means making their
desires known, they organised secret societies which agitated for reforms, including the
establishment of a constitution. These societies, afterwards called the Decembrists, were planning a
widespread uprising but, when Alexander suddenly died, resolved to take advantage of the
uncertainty that existed regarding the succession to attempt a coup d 'etat. But the plotters had no
clear plan or organisation and had made no

King Phillip And Puwblo Revolt:compare And Contrast Essay
5 years and nearly an entire continent separated King Philip's war from the great pueblo revolt.
Compare and contrast the causes and consequences of these 2 conflicts.
The Great Pueblo revolt of 1680 all started with the droughts of 1660 when the Southwest had
severe drought that brought famine and disease. During this, hungry Apaches who couldn't find food
on plains attacked the pueblos. This angered the people on the pueblos, but there new leader Pope', a
mysterious medicine doctor, tried to keep the Indian beliefs around and resisted the Christian
religion. The Spaniards hated this, so they captured his older brother. This enraged Pope' against the
Spaniards so he held meetings to tell everybody that the Spaniards must leave. The ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Spaniards got word of the attack, and notified every Spanish official in the pueblos to arrest any
expected ringleader of the Indians. The Spaniards were also notified that the Indians had painted
themselves for war. They rounded up all of their people, distributed arms, and let everybody wait to
see what will happen.
Later that day, there were uprisings in many of the pueblos, but the capital of Santa Fe was not
attacked yet. On August 14, 500 Indians marched on Santa Fe. The governor tried to negotiate with
the Indians before they attacked, but it failed and the next morning the Spaniard attacked the
Indians. The Indians were driven from their position and fled to the foothills, until Indian
reinforcements put them back in position to attack Santa Fe.
Two days later, 2500 Indians charged the Spaniards and swarmed around the palace and burned a
chapel. The entire Spaniard army met the Indians in the plaza at the capital and waged hand to hand
combat all day long. The Spaniards sent the Indians back, and they retreated into their palace.
The next day the Spaniards met the Indians and tried to regain there water soured back, but were
met with a huge resistance. They were sent back to the palace, and watched the Indians burn all of
Santa Fe during the night. The next morning the Spaniards took the Indians by surprise, and killed

The Coming of the Spanish and the Pueblo Revolt (Hopi)
"The Coming of the Spanish and the Pueblo Revolt" (Hopi)
"The Coming of the Spanish and the Pueblo Revolt" (Hopi) illustrates how the interactions of two
distinctly different groups of people inevitably change the dynamics of each group, collectively and
individually. This story is told from the Hopi perspective, but the outcome of the Pueblo Revolt is
historically validated. It is the events described in this story that show how the Hopi and the
Spaniards change by contact with each other. A few of the changes for the Hopi were the upheaval
of their Utopian–like existence by the arrival of the Spaniards, the need to practice their religion
secretly, and the determination to use violence to defend their own, even though it was ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A brother of one of the victims confronted the abuser of his sister, but was frightened away. It was
discovered that these abusive practices were occurring in other areas so the Hopi, as well as other
Indian groups, banded together to revolt. This ultimately led to the revolt of the Hopi toward the
Spaniards, as all Priests would be killed on the fourth day after a full moon. The very premise of the
Spaniard's mission to America (perpetuation of

The Plebians Revolt
Rome, the city of love, is a dreamed destination for many. Yet beneath this picturesque spot lies an
adamant root from the past that dominated a certain era in the history of the world. Dating from
some 500 B.C., Rome stamped its territory as an example for many. As a matter of fact, the Roman
was under the influence of monarchy until the Patricians and the Plebians fought their way to
freedom (Morey W.C., n.d.). That's when the disparities between those two classes got highlighted.
Today we will attempt to accentuate those differences politically and economically speaking and we
will prolong our thinking on the emergence of the Plebians revolt. Back in the days, the Roman
population was dissected into two classes namely the Patricians and

Snow Piercer Analysis
Snow Piercer was directed by Bong Joon–ho in 2013, which is based on the French novel Le
Transperceneige. At first glance, most people will not understand the many themes that this
particular film has. After carefully examining the film the viewers may find the hidden themes in the
film that will be explained in this analysis. Themes that will discuss are humanity, revolt, and master
of your fate. There are many sub–themes within the film but this particular analysis, it is the crucial
focus on these themes because it helps develop the central plot and conflict with in the film. The
first theme that will discuss is humanity. The whole plot of the movie focuses on preserving
humanity or what's left of it. After global warming had destroyed the earth and making unsuitable
for any living creature to survive the Conductor train made that makes an around trip cross the earth
to try to preserve humanity. Even though he was ridiculed about his theories and his plan to save
humanity he still went ahead with plans and end up saving what was left of humanity. Throughout
the movie, many of the characters' humanity was tested. Even though the Conductor saved humanity
he sectioned off the train by class. The lower class was placed in the last cart of the train. They were
treated horribly and were supplied with the basic necessity of living. Since the lower class did not
have the basic necessity of living their humanity was questioned every day. Later in the film the
protagonist in the

Revolt Of 1381 Research Paper
The Peasants' Revolt of 1381 was an important uprising in much of England during the medieval
time period. It is also known as Wat Tyler's Rebellion and The Great Rising. It was one of the first
popular uprisings in England, and over very important issues. The feudal system, serfdom, the
Statue of Laborers (originally spelled Labourers), little to no pay, tithes, poll tax, and the general
unfairness of the time led to tensions, and action being taken. The feudal system did not have
balance, and left much of the population unhappy.
The king was at the top. He was in complete control, owning all of the land in the country, and only
gave out land to his trustees. Next were the barons, who had manors. They lived on the king's land,
but were ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
John Bampton, an English churchman, was sent to check on why the poll tax wasn't being paid. The
villagers were armed, and organized. He asked one village representative, Thomas Baker, why the
tax had not been paid. Baker claimed that the tax had already been paid by the village and that no
money was owed. Baker was then to be arrested, and the villagers got violent. News of the revolt
spread quickly in the area. Several groups of revolting peasants travelled around, village to village,
spreading the word. A leader came out among the rebels, names Wat Tyler. Eventually, they began to
march to London. When they got there, they wreaked havoc. They ransacked parts of the city,
burning some along the way. King Richard decided to meet with the rebels, out of the city. Here,
rebel leader Wat Tyler told the peasants' terms to the king. He said that price of living was to be
reduced. Also, the poll tax to be removed, there were to be pardons for all rebel, and that peasants
would have rights and privileges. While this happened, a group of peasants took advantage of the
situation. They raided the Tower of London and beheaded some people there. The king could not let
that go by unanswered. Another meeting was arranged, with just Wat Tyler and a few of his closer
followers, and the king with some of his men. Wat Tyler was killed here, after purportedly
disrespecting the king, but his death seems to be something not all

Ionian Revolt
Threat affects the dependent variable of state behavior. Walt states that powers will either balance or
bandwagon against another state. "If a weak state is on good terms with a powerful state, the weak
state will be unlikely to balance against the stronger state." Furthermore, the weaker state is likely to
benefit from the alliance because of added security. However, "if the weaker state perceives the
stronger state as a threat, then the weaker state will balance against the strong state in order to
protect itself." Additionally, if the state is not a good terms with the rival state, it is unable to
bandwagon and will therefore engage in balancing. Balancing can be broken up into internal and
external parts. A state can either build up their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Since balance of threat assumes every state is a black box, it does not look at internal causes of
conflict. Within Ionia, they had a history of tension with the Persians. Since Persia had enacted
tyrants over the Greek city–states, they already disliked them and were ready to rebel. This reason
may have been a cause of the Ionian Revolt, which Walt did not account for. Notwithstanding this
criticism, the balance of threat theory provides the best explanation for the revolt. It is able to
explain the initial attempt at bandwagoning and the final decision to balance. The theory is able to
account for aggregate power, geographical proximity, offensive capabilities, and offensive intent.
This allows more than just two factors to influence how a state will react. Another strength of Walt's
theory is focusing on the threat rather than the power. Even if a state has great power, a rival state
may not react to it if it does not possess a threat. Vice versa, a state with small power, but a great
threat, may cause the rival state to react by balancing or bandwagoning. Together, the theory of
balance of threat is able to provide a better explanation for the Ionian

Revolt Of 1381 Summary
This account of the Peasants' Revolt of 1381 by Jean Froissart, a medieval author and historian, is
clearly quite biased in favor of the ruling class, but is nevertheless a valuable contemporary report of
the causes of the uprising. Froissart focuses his attention on John Ball, an influential preacher who
helped incite the rebellion. According to Froissart's account, Ball preached against the economic
system of the time, railing against the luxurious clothes, houses, and food enjoyed by feudal lords at
the expense of the peasants' labor. John Ball rooted his argument against this system in the Bible,
insisting that since all men were born from the same father and mother (Adam and Eve), all were
thus equal in the eyes of god. Though Froissart ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hilton stresses that these economies were self–sufficient and durable, resilient even to the
devastation of war. The self–contained and secure nature of the economies in these peasant
communities leads Hilton to conclude that they would have been perfectly capable of functioning
without the intervention of the higher classes. Moreover, Hilton proposes that the peasants may have
been conscious of this. Especially in light of the frequent rebellions, he suggests that medieval
peasants were acutely aware that their way of life had existed for far longer than the lords who
exhorted rent and other payments from them. Hilton also doesn't fail to mention that many of these
lords only attained their lands through conquest. From such a viewpoint, feudal lords seem less like
even–handed governors, and more like an imposing mafia. As a Marxist, Hilton may be guilty of
overstating the flawless workings of the peasants' alleged proto–socialism; however, his explanation
for the peasants' frustrations is well–reasoned, and surely provides a more accurate view of the
peasants' thoughts than the works of most medieval historians. It is therefore a beneficial source for
my

The British Occupation Of Egypt
British Occupation of Egypt in 1882, the Suez Canal and British Involvement in Egyptian Policy
The British occupation of Egypt in 1882 was a key event in the history of Egypt, they went bankrupt
in 1876 and were under dual control of Britain and France in 1879. Egypt's banks were taken over
by British and French representatives and the Suez Canal was also under the British and French
control. The Urabi revolt of 1879–1882 caused a huge uprising against British/French control of
Egypt as Ahmed Urabi rose up against the Khedive of Egypt Tewfik Pasha. The British were forced
to intervene before they lost control of this region that held their most valuable pathway to India.
The British were forced to act and in April 1882, sent warships to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The fighting only lasted a couple months and for the British in confirmed their control of Egypt and
allowed them to take control of not just the financial, but also the economic side of Egypt. The
British were very interested in Egyptian cotton as it grew in long fiber which made it better for
making clothing. This is just one of many interests the British had in this region.
The British occupation of Egypt began to make Egyptians question how much control of Egypt was
actually in their hands and this led to revolutionaries like Urabi standing up against the British. The
British occupied Egypt in 1882 because they wanted to keep control of the Suez Canal for direct
access to India, they wanted to keep the government under the Khedive's control so they could keep
their access to Egypt's economic resources, especially cotton and they wanted to protect their joint
control alliance with France in order to control the Egyptian nationalists. There are many conflicting
ideas about why the British occupied Egypt, whether it be for economic purposes or for strategic
purposes, the main reason was because of their control of the Suez Canal.
Alexander Scholch argues that because of initiatives by British Prime Minister William Gladstone,
who wanted to take control

The Caabans Revolt
The Cabans revolt happened due to the religious issues such as governmental concessions to the
Protestants and anti–seigniorial detestation in Aix, Manosque, Sisteron, Valensole, Arles, and
Marseilles. In Provence, the majority of the country gentry remained Catholic, but Protestants
dominated in towns such as Montauban, Nîmes, Montpellier, and Castres, in the Cevennes, the
Pyrenees, and Dauphiné. Consequently, many Huguenots were murdered on the charges of
conspiracy against their towns and the whole province became the ground of infamous forces of the
Porcellets. The Catholic peasants, known as the Cabans , who had most to suffer amid this chaos,
rose in turn and made a relentless war on all upper classes of society, both the Huguenots

The Agrarian Revolt Of The 1920
The Agrarian revolt of the 1920 to 1926 in Naranja occurred well before all other regions of Mexico
could gather themselves and demand for such. It was a risky endeavor and it only succeeded
because of the historic precedent that favor the Tarascans of Naranja. From their pre–conquistador
contact history to their post–Diaz situation, the people of Naranja were pushed towards the front of
the queue of people with grievances toward the Mexican government. Their experiences also built
up their moral and courage to revolt despite the repercussions and the probability of backlash. Then
finally, their leaders, especially Primo Tapia, were uniquely prepared to take up the mantle and lead
them to victory. The people of Naranja, Michoacan were ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The people of Naranja were also nearly exclusively Indian (indigenous). There was even a common
but unspoken animosity towards mestizos and people of Spanish descent and origin. Fredrich had
mentioned that then and even now, there is the very occurrence of mixing of the Spanish and
indigenous blood in these parts. Like mentioned before most were illiterate in Spanish and they were
very set in their ways traditionally. The Spaniards had also ruled over the people indirectly via an
already established royal hierarchy in the region in the form of a cacique. Hence the people had had
little direct exposure to the Spanish (and later on Mexican) governing forces. The most influential
outsider was without a doubt the local priest. All these accumulated and made the Tarascan people
an isolated people that did not conform to societal expectations of submissiveness to authority or
docility in the presence of oppressive government regimes. Then the economic and social impacts of
the Spanish (or Mexican) government was also a great influencer in their decision to revolt at the
time that they did. During the Diaz era, some brothers were granted land in the area, near the lake.
This land was not given to these brothers with the consent of the people of Naranja, only their
corrupt and incompetent leaders and Porfirio Diaz signed off on the deal. These businessmen
developed a very successful grain hacienda on the land and they employed the

Miletus Research Paper
While under the Persian influence around 525 BC Miletus reorganized its constitution. Miletus will
have an annual magistrate called the Aisymuetes or president. They will serve as the chief priest at
the temple of Apollo of Didyma. They will also have the official called the Molpoi or psalmist. This
is the group where the presidents were elected from. They were assisted by three officials called the
associates. These three were elected biennially from the six tribes. Miletus also had the subordinate
official called the Ouitadue. Ag p. 151–2 In 520 BC the power was retained under the control of
Darius. Miletus came under the control of the tyrant Histiaeus, who participated in the Scythian
expedition with King Darius. He was supported and highly ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
After being repopulated, the people of Miletus restored the old constitution. They changed a few
things like abolishing the associates with their jobs being taken over by other officials. They also
started the business of religious matters again at Didyma at the temple of Apollo. They continued to
divide the population into the six tribes. It became strong enough to play a role later in the fifth
century in the struggle for Greece between Athens and Sparta. Athens had Miletus join into the
Delian League, but they were still too weak to contribute partly due to the destruction of the city.
Miletus also faced internal political conflict and Athens became involved in the situation. Athens
supported the upper class to continue to rule rather than a democracy which is what Athens used to
rule its city–state. However, this upper class of rulers started to take advantage of the workers
causing more tension. "The oligarchs revolted from Athens and massacred their opponents. By 442
at the latest Athens put down the revolt and established a democratic government on the Athenian
model." Gs Pg 398 After they created some stability, they appointed a commission of five to revise
and change the constitution of Miletus. The appointed commission of five followed the structure and
order of the Athenian form of government. They had a council with superior magistrates called
wardens. They also had assistant magistrates called colleagues. The Psalmist

The Netherlands Revolt
My paper will discuss several factors that led to the success of the Revolt of the Netherlands which
include; hatred of the Spain monarchy in the Netherlands, failure of King Philip II as a ruler, the
union of the provinces within the Netherlands, the support of foreign allies and Spanish enemies,
and Spain's lack of funds. This revolt was composed of people from all social classes and all of
these men were all driven and motivated by a deep hate of Spain. After Charles V, Philip II became
the king of the Spanish Netherlands. Unlike Charles V, Philip II was not part of the Habsburg
Empire, known as the Netherlands. The people of Netherland considered him a foreigner and he was
often portrayed as being extremely arrogant and uncaring towards ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Philip II believed in complete sovereign power on his quest to create centralization in the region, so
he chose to exclude the involvement of the high nobility from any polices that the king made or
would make in the future (Zagorin, Pg.91). They would have no say in what the government would
do or what policies it would carry out. The accused him of violating the liberties of the province that
he ruled and even when various please were made to him change his policies, he refused to accept
the advice and consent of the nobility or estates.
With his insistence on denying the Dutch their religious freedom and then denying the nobility the
right to have a say in policy matters, he set in motion the start of the revolution. The Netherlands
was a region that had various different provinces; they were not a united front, politically speaking.
But one thing that they did have in common was that they looked upon the noblemen for guidance.
The noblemen were seen as leaders, sometimes even acting as provincial governors, and they
usually provided politically guidance to those in need, apart from dealing with any issues that town
people

The Pueblo Revolt
Native Americans are the first inhabitants of North America by centuries; however, many believe
that American history started when Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492 and
discovered a new world . Although the English, French, and Spanish arrived around the same time,
they all interacted with the Natives in different ways to achieve what they were seeking, such as
land, riches, etc. However, once the European pursuit of riches and land became brutal and
malicious, the Natives attempted several revolts, such as the Pueblo Revolt or King Phillip's War,
that unfortunately, has some dire consequences, such as death and slavery. Although English were
the last party to cross the Atlantic, they were proactive in their attempt to get ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
However, majority of the time, they were treated as lesser and subject to unfair treatment that
inevitably lead to them revolting against the Europeans. The Europeans may have had different
ways of interacting with the Native Americans, they were all looking for some sort of gain.
Although their revolts may not have had the desired outcome, they stood their ground and fought for
what they believed

Alexandria In Justine
The representation of Alexandria in Lawrence Durrell's Justine In his novel, Justine, Lawrence
Durrell gives his readers a new version of Alexandria, claiming that this is the "real city". The novel
would arouse many questions to an Alexandrian reader's mind; does Durrell factually represent the
Cosmopolitan city of the time? Do his characters reflect the kind of life which the Alexandrian
inhabitants had back then? Or is he giving, throughout Justine, a parallel mythical city which he
created out of his imagination? The book clearly reflects Durrell's viewpoint regarding Alexandria;
he exhibits it as an erotic city that enforces a state of total indulgence in sensual pleasures upon its
inhabitants. Moreover, he tackles the city ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Durrell presents two Alexandrias; the Arabic Alexandria which is always related to negative
descriptions and always looked at with resentment and disgust, and the European Alexandria which
comes along with the clean streets and the civilized characters. Durrell exhibits the Arab Quarters as
an undefined mass; he does not name their streets or their cafes; he gives them no identity. In
contrast, the European streets are named, for instance; Rue Foaad, Rue Sherief and Naby Daniel.
The voice of the Arabs is shut; we do not get to see any Egyptian characters except for Nessim,
whom we know lately in the Alexandria Quartet about his national treason; a person who has no
sense of belonging towards Egypt. Nessim also is so westernized; the fact that Nessim's voice is
heard in the novel goes back to his wealthy state and his high social rank that did enable him to
neglect his Egyptian nationality and have a European lifestyle. Hence, Nessim does not represent the
real Egyptian Alexandrian inhabitant of the time. Durrell's claim that "only the city is real" is
questionable; you cannot write a novel as a representative of Alexandria and its inhabitants while
choosing to foreground only the western voices and background the Arab ones. So Durrell's colonial
ideology is shown in his writing; his tone is racial and biased against the Egyptians. Moreover,
Durrell depicts Muslim Arabs as racist violent people who persecute

Revolt Of The Homosexual Analysis
In his published 1968 article printed by the Village Voice, Seymour Krim's, Revolt of the
Homosexual, converses with a fictitious 'straight guy' to reduce the preconceived notions of the life
of homosexuals, and insisted that it is a natural behavior. This was a bold action considering that
homosexuality at the time was considered an aberration or a disease. He challenged the theory that
being gay is a sickness, and he desired a right for all homosexuals to not be criminalized, as long as
it does not conflict actual harm on another person. Basically, he demands a 'simple human right', and
believes that if the oppression continues then homosexuals will gradually start to stand against it
because they are tired of having to hide– just like how ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, some people believe that lesbians are not a real sex experience because there is no
phallus involved. This translates to the idea that there needs to be a man and a woman, or aka, the
dominant and the submissive. Therefore, women cannot emulate masculinity– only a man can
assume that role. Not even butch lesbian women could mirror that aspect, and if a woman were to
claim that feature then they were pretending to be man. Therefore, a stigma gets attached to lesbian
relationships, and renders the butch as a less desirable being. While in the 19th century Butch–
Femme was a more prominent trend in lesbian relationships, it does not translate to today's times
(Smith and Stillman). In itself, this occurrence may be a revolt, and may be one of the main
contributions to the lightening of homosexual views as 'revolting'. On the one hand, common
lesbians are stereotypically viewed as obese, short haired, and 'ugly' women. On the other hand, with
the rise of online dating apps, especially for the homosexuals, more attractive women are gradually
coming out to shed the image of the stereotypical lesbian. Consequently, lesbian women are
demeaned as only something physically appealing to look at by others, as observed by the
considerable porn websites like Pornhub categorizing lesbian porn under a 'straight' category.
Likewise, while female body issues are in general more prominent in the media than men, males are
experiencing increasing pressures to attain a certain

The Peasants Revolt
The knightly Wadsley family were the lords of the manor. They hunted deer on Loxley Chase, and
fletchers (arrow makers) lived on Loxley Common. Richard Grafton, printer to Edward VI tells us
Robin Hood was "descended of a noble parentage,"* thereby explaining his prowess with sword and
bow due to the training received by children of the nobility. Dodsworth's comment that his mother
kept him after he killed his stepfather and fled into the woods, suggests he was young and looked
after by a nanny or servants. Changing his name from Robert Dore to Robert Hood and absconding
from court would make him a fugitive and an outlaw. Later, Robin and the citizens of York rebelled
against the unpopular lord mayor in the Peasants Revolt. The mayors name was John Gisbourne. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ohlgren wrote, "The urban guilds, including the master guilds or Great Livery Companies set the
policies and practices of Robin's guild or fellowship.... The parallels between guild policies and
practices and specific scenes in the Geste are compelling, offering convincing evidence that the
audience would not only recognize the mercantile allusions, but also appreciate the yeoman hero
proving himself superior to the knightly class." The king owed his "comely appearance" to the skill
and craftsmanship of the guilds, one of which was Robin's guild. The patron saint of the drapers
guild was the Virgin Mary, who Robin loved and whose name was often on his lips. A charitable
organisation known as the guild of "Our Lord Jesus and the Blessed Virgin Mary" cared for the
widows and orphans of their deceased members. These people were destitute and tradition has it that
Robin gave to the poor what he took from the rich. They would include the wicked churchmen, his
clients as a merchant, services rendered to his lord, king and country, and if Robin was a knight as
seems likely, then rich pickings were available from ransom money and

The Revolt Of The Fens
The Revolt in the Fens was lead by Hereward and had been strengthened by refugees from the
harrowing of Northumberland, including Earl Mokar. During this same time Osbjorn was taken
bribes that had weakened the army. However, even while his brother, Jarl Osbjorn could be bought
off, but King Swein of Denmark and his new fleet was not offered this same deal and was preparing
for battle. During this his brother Jarl Osbjorn and his fleet had been bought off, King Swein of
Denmark and his new fleet had not. What happened during 1070 and 1071 could be consider fact as
it could legend. It is know that William made two different attempts both unsuccessful, either in
person or through a lieutenant to take Isle Ely where Hereward and his forces were based. We also
know that Hereward did not fear to pay for his Danish allies. Hereward paid the Danish to sack the
Peterborough and its Cathedral, which was now controlled by the Norman Bishop. What it is still up
to debate is how thing exact happenings, nor the sequence of events. Eventually Swein, maybe
seeing himself in a no win situation, gave the offer to be paid off. The Normans soon took Ely after
the betrayal of the local monks secret causeways though the Fens that would allow an army to
access the isle. Although Ely fell in 1071, Hereward escaped and, with loyal followers, remained a
nuisance to king William for many more years to come. In 1072 another thorn in William side came
form the scots with their numbers swelling by

The Causes Of The European Colonization Of North America
The European conquest of North America was not inevitable. Small groups of Europeans claimed
large areas densely populated by hostile Indian nations. The English and Spanish faced particularly
fierce resistance from the Wampanoag and Pueblo peoples in present day New England and the
American Southwest. The Wampanoags and Pueblos both revolted against European colonization
and conquest in 1675 and 1680 due to attacks on their sovereignty, attacks on their welfare, and
mass death. The Pueblos were more successful than the Wampanoags because they gained from the
revolts while the New England Nations lost everything during King Philip's War. In both cases,
Indian nations formed the first pan–indigenous, anti–European alliances, and Europeans secured a
beachhead in North America King Philip's War began due to escalating Puritan attacks on
Wampanoag sovereignty, forcing the Confederacy into a war for survival. The path to war began in
1662 when the Wampanoag Chief Metacomet rose to power. He denounced illegal Puritan seizure of
Wampanoag traditional hunting grounds. On multiple occasions, English settlers jailed Wampanoag
hunters for "trespassing" on ancestral Indian lands. This attack on Wampanoag sovereignty denied
that Indians could have a legitimate claim to their own territory. By accomplishing this, English
colonists could declare the Indian's authority void as an excuse to take more land. Relations soured
in December of 1674 when John Sassamon, a Christian Indian, was murdered by Wampanoags for
reporting Metacomet's war preparations to the English. Puritans arrested three Wampanoags, tried
them for murder, and hanged them. This was the first time English tried an Indian for crimes against
another Indian. The trial demonstrated that the English believed they also had authority over
Metacomet's people. By using the English courts to try an Indian–on–Indian murder, the Puritans
again claimed the Wampanoags had no authority, and therefore were not worthy of respect as a
nation. This disrespect allowed the Puritans to see them not as people, but as pests to be removed
from their land. Beliefs such as this led to further escalation by the Puritan leaders. Tensions rose,
and Metacomet formed a coalition

The Decembrist Uprising
Constantine and people swore an oath to him. Later it was revealed that in some secret pact signed
in 1822 by Alexander, he stated that Nicholas would take upon the throne after his death. This
further gave the Decembrists an opportunity to lead a revolt and they guessed that all soldiers and
people too would be confused in such a situation. They decided not to swear an oath and refuse
Nicholas as Tsar on December 14, 1825 and call a revolt at the same day. The Decembrists Revolt at
The Senate Square The conspirators planned to gather their troops and march them to Senate
Square. The Decembrist called the revolt on the morning of December14, 1825 and approximately a
force of 3000 stood strong at the square, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This movement was the outgrowth of a national condition which can be traced back into eighteenth
century. "Decembrism" itself was not only a short– lived revolutionary idea but it was an attitude
held by at least two generations, a philosophy of political rebellion which came to climax on
December 14, 1825. Though defeated, the Decembrists left an indelible impression upon Nicholas
and throughout his reign, he always considered developments from a viewpoint determined by his
sad memories of December 14. In spite of the fact that it failed to achieve immediate positive
results, the revolt bore healthy seeds and it has been considered as the first revolutionary movement.
The testimonies of the Decembrists directed the government's attention to the gravity of general
condition in the state, to increasing discontent and necessity for economic improvements. The
government took definite measures and reforms were also introduced. Serfdom was also abolished
in 1861. Although the revolt remained a neglected and suppressed topic during Nicholas's reign but
Alexander Herzen placed profiles of executed Decembrists on the cover of his periodical Polar Star.
In spite of all the shortcomings of The Decembrist Revolt, this was the first ever open breach
between the government and liberal elements, and it subsequently in some way helped Russia

Causes Of The Pueblo Revolt
Pueblo revolt
The Pueblo revolt was the changing point for the relationship between the Spanish and native
population and one of the earliest tragedies to befall the Natives at the time but to explain what lead
to the revolt we must step back into history and look at the events that lead to this.
The Spanish had been expanding their influence in the new world by conquering the empires and
peoples. Soon they would extend northward continuing to claim new land thereby building New
Spain. Starting in 1540 the Spanish moved into what would become New Mexico. With the Spanish
expansion came soldiers, missionaries, and settlers. These movements would lead to a confrontation
between the Pueblo people and the Spaniards known as the "Tiguex War." The "Tiguex War" was
spearheaded by occurred during the winter of 1540–41. Leading the Spaniard troops was Francisco
Vásquez de Coronado. The Spanish attacked the 12 tribes of the region leading to a further
breakdown of Native and Spanish relations that would continue until 1598. Juan De Onate led a
force of over 100 soldiers women children and Priests into the Rio Grande Valley attempting to start
a Spanish settlement. The establishment of this new settlement soon leads to another revolt between
the Pueblo and the Spaniards. This rebellion is known as the "Tacoma Massacre." Under the
command of Juan De Onate, the Spanish soldiers killed and enslaved hundreds of Natives. Onate
also ordered the right foot to be removed from the 24

Maureo Jaquez During The French Revolution
Since it's foundation in 1330, the capital city of Millares has grown from two villages into the
massive city it is known. Castilla Palace stood out as it was the tallest building in the city, made out
of limestone. Construction lasted 13 years as hundreds of workers died while building the palace
from the ground up. It was finally done in 1465 as the entire palace with inaugurated on King
Florinio Castilla's thirty birthday. It included a dome, cloisters, statues of several religious heads,
corridors, an inner garden, an infirmary, and a library. The throne room wasn't added to the palace
until the Ávila family had the crown in 1730. After the Ávila Revolt ended, the Medellin–Varejão
families took over the palace and made it their home. Queen ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The double wooden doors opened as Mariana entered the meeting room to see her usual ministers,
waiting for their Queen. The guards shut the doors as she entered the room and walked towards her
seat. The three men stood up until the Queen took her seat as they waited to present their reports.
"Terribly sorry that I was late. My family was keeping me back. I am ready to hear about your
findings." she said to the men as she was ready to hear the reports. Alvizo was the first one to speak.
"My Queen, the economy of Batigefalé is slowly growing back. But, we are still in debt and the
provinces are growing more unrest. It has been fourteen years since the revolt ended, but the
economy is still in bad. We must do something before it's too late." Alvizo spoke as he looked at his
papers and back at the Queen.
"What do you suggest we do?" she

Animating Revolt
Films with sound have been around since 1927, and animated films have been around since the
1930s. The main job of an animated film is to entertain, to captivate, and to fascinate the audience,
typically with no deeper meaning; however, with the new genre of 'Pixarvolt' films the children's
animation genre has taken a turn leading toward deeper meanings and hidden messages throughout
the movie. Animating revolt is a new form of portraying children's movies, usually expressing
something progressive as a hidden message, to the disapproval or unbeknownst of a conservative
parent, but to the progressive. In the essay, Animating Revolt and Revolting Animation by Judith
Halberstam, Judith uncovers all of the hidden messages and subtle progressions ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
What most of you parents don't see are the decoded messages that take place in front of your young
children every day while they watch their favorite cartoon show. If you don't let your 12 year old
child cross the street without permission or listen to the radio because of the curse words used, why
would you let him watch a show where the two main characters show a homoerotic relationship and
have no career aspirations other than being a worker at a fast food restaurant? Halberstam points out
all of radical, crafty messages included in these films, not just the cliché 'treat people how you want
to be treated' messages, such as "the homoerotics of SpongeBob's and Patrick's relationship."
(Halberstam 289). This is an example of how Halberstam would view this television show, and how
you are more often than not unknowing of the radical content known as animating revolt. Not many
people have wrapped their head around the fact that SpongeBob and Patrick portray themselves to
be in a same–sex relationship, and if you started to find out about the nature of this show you would
surely not be showing such progressive content to your young

Boudicca & the Revolt
The spoils of wars, invasions, rebellions, and triumphs have plagued British history. Yet, perhaps
one of the most defining moments of its' past is the Icenian revolt led by Boudicca against the
Roman Rule in an attempt to re–establish Celtic power, in 61 AD. With the revolt being largely
recounted by two of the most influential Roman historians of the ancient world, Cornelius Tacitus
and Cassius Dio, the British were successfully presented to be of a barbaric nature; leaving behind a
legacy of destruction and massacre that resulted in military failure and brought forth little success.
But despite the obvious Roman agenda that has been intertwined within the recounts of Tacitus and
Dio, they remain to be the only credible primary sources ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Yet, both historians have recorded similar information in regards to the events and the aftermath. In
Tacitus' 'The Annals', Boudicca's army destroyed Camulodunum and burnt down the Temple of
Claudius – referred to as 'Citadel of Tyranny' by Paul Sealey – a major symbolic victory for the
Trinovantes, whose land was seized for the construction of the temple. The large army then
advanced to Londinium, where Suetonius was awaiting them. However, upon contemplation,
Suetonius decided to abandon Londinium to its fate on the basis of his army's numerical inferiority,
a decision that was morally criticized by Tacitus, 'unmoved by lamentations and appeals, Suetonius
gave the signal for departure.' Tacitus portrays the rebels as barbaric during their campaign,
recounting that they 'could not wait to cut throats, hang, burn and crucify.' Similarly, Dio, in 'Roman
History VIII' also depicts the Britons as savages by describing in detail their methods of torture,
'They hung up naked the noblest women and then cut off their breasts...' After the rebels ravaged
Londinium and Verulamium, in an unknown location, Suetonius gathered his army of 10,000 men.
Suetonius positioned his men in a position that gave the British the impression that they were
trapped, giving the Romans the advantage of deceiving their opponents before an ambush attack. As
Boudicca's army of, according to Dio, 230,000 men encountered

The Cause Of The Pueblo Revolt Of 1680
The cause of the Pueblo Revolt of 1680 has brought up a substantial amount of controversy between
historians. Several historians took the preserved historical documents and gathered information from
oral history to try and piece together the reason why the Pueblos revolted to begin with. Some
historians point to religion as the sole cause, while others say it required the right leader, and still
others point to the racial segregation and mixture of the Pueblos and Spanish blood as the cause of
the revolt. While each historian has his own viewpoint, it is important to look into the reasons why
each come to their own specific conclusions and determine if their argument is a biased or a
balanced perspective. The main things to consider are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Over the course of eighty years however, the Pueblos were able to learn the ways of the Spaniards
such as battle tactics, food storage, crop cultivation, and building up immunity to the diseases that
nearly eradicated their ancestors. When the drought and famine came during the time leading up to
1680, the Spaniards were likely becoming weaker and the Pueblos, an equally formidable force to
their own manpower. Therefore, when 1680 came around, it was prime time for the Pueblos to revolt
and gain back the freedom that their ancestors had once enjoyed. But not only that, because the
Spaniards could no longer protect the Pueblos from the Apache raids and promise them basic needs
like food and shelter, they felt that gaining their own dependence back and standing on their own
feet again was an option that was within reach. Garner points out that it was not likely that the
Pueblos were planning a revolt for the eighty years that they were in captivity, but it could have very
well been in the back of their minds. The year 1680 might have been the most ideal time for them to
rise up against the Spaniards. After explaining the main reason for the revolt, Garner goes on to
focus on two of the main arguments opposing his own. Unlike other historians, Garner ascertains
that religion and the harsh oppression of the Spanish were not sole causes of the revolt. To build his
case, throughout his paper, he compares

The Upper Rio Grande Essay
The Upper Rio Grande
Change is an unavoidable part of life. For some, change can bring promise and a new beginning. For
others, change disrupts what is routine and normal and makes what is new seem strange and
unfamiliar. The history of North America has been shaped by change ever since Columbus first
discovered the continent in 1492. With that discovery, the continent would never be the same again.
More specifically, the Native American tribes who first inhabited this continent would never be the
same.
Over the years the Native Americans would see new explorers and missionaries take over the land
that was once theirs and claim it for another country. The traditions, customs, and culture of these
Native Americans inevitably ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Finally, this paper will give an overview of the native people of the Upper Rio Grande during the
19th century and their interaction with the rest of New Mexico.
From 1598–1606, Don Juan de Orate colonized the Rio Grande area. The Spanish settlers came with
more than just colonization on their minds. Orate and his men were hoping the area would prove to
be a huge resource of gold and other valuable resources. Meanwhile, Spanish missionaries brought
Christianity to the Indians (White, 6).
Orate entered the area now known as New Mexico with a group made up of "130 families, 276
single men, 83 wagons and carts, 11 Franciscan Friars (and) 7,000 cattle herded by drovers on foot"
(Horgan, 161). At a celebration of the settlement, Orate asserted what he believed was a rightful
claim to the land that was already occupied by Pueblo Indians. Before kneeling at a cross and asking
God for the successful conversion of the native people, he said "I take possession . . .of the lands of
the said Rio Grande, without exception whatsoever, with all its meadows and pasture grounds and
passes . . . and all its native Indians (Horgan, 165). The Spanish did not take no for an answer.
They took supplies from the Indians; sometimes paying for them, sometimes not. They were
ruthless.
Within a year of Onate's speech, the Indians showed their disapproval of the arrangement as

Summary of Eros and Civilization: Marcuse
Eros and civilization:
Xi Break fatal union of productivity and destruction, liberty and repression.rational for continued
acceptance of domination, scarcity artificially perpetuated. Strengthened by even more efficient
forms of social control: very forces that rendered society capable of pacifying struggle for existence
served to repress in the individuals the need for such liberation. High standards of living reconcile
people with their life and rulers + social engineering of the soul and science of human relations
provide libidinal cathexis. Xii Scientific managment of instinctual needs has become a vital factor in
the reproduction of the system: merchandise which has to be bought and used is made into objects
of the libido; national ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Revolt against machine which has taken over mechanism (pol, corporate, cultural and educational)
which has welded blessing and curse into one rational whole. Body against machine (unconquered,
primitive, elemental forces?) guerilla warfare as revolution of our time? Historical backwardness
may become hist chance of turning the wheel of progress to another direction. The 'accidents' reveal
substance; tear techn veil behind which real powers are hiding. Productive forces seem to become
more productive the more comfortable the system becomes to its privileged subjects. Xviii Affluent
society is a society at war, citizens dont notice,but victims do. Previous rev:more rational
development of productive forces, now in affluent rev woul mean reversal of this trend: elimination
of overdevelopment and repressive rationality. Xix in revolt of backward people, rich societies meet
not only soc revolt in traditional sense, but also an instinctual revolt–biological hatred. Spread of
guerilla warfare: rebels frightful existence is in total need of liberation. Western civi always glorified
hero, who died for city/nation, but never asked whether city is worth it. Taboo on unquestionable
prerogative of the whole always maintained and enforced and the more brutally the more the whole
was supposed to consist of free individuals. Violence may start in new chain, in and against this
continumm

Effects Of The Amistad Revolt
On July 2, 1839, 53 hostage Africans on board the Amistad, a slave ship, broke out of their chains
and snuck up to the primary deck, where they overpowered and killed two crewmembers and
incapacitated the rest. Having hence seized control of the ship, they endeavored to cruise back to
their country, just to be deluded into traveling north rather than east. Throughout the following two
months, they went around 1,400 miles from Cuba to Long Island, New York, until the point when
the Naval force lifted them up and re–imprisoned them. The Amistad was not the only slave revolt,
but one of the most significant. This revolt was an integral part of slave history because it brought
attention to the issue of slavery, inspired many, and helped establish laws and court systems today.
This Revolt brought attention to the issue of slavery. From the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries,
approximatelyn expected 12 million Africans were persuasively dispatched over the Atlantic Sea to
the New World. Of those, no less than 1.5 million are said to have died before reaching shore. Many
states had made the importation of slaves illegal. However, since bondage itself stayed lawful in the
greater part of those spots, unlawful exercises flourished. Along the shore of present–day Sierra
Leone, for instance, Spanish slave merchant Pedro Blanco kept his business thriving with the
assistance of a capable nearby pioneer who gathered together his human freight. This was a legal,
and lucrative

Summary Of Animating Revolt
We have grown up watching tons of animated movies finding them so entertaining. But we may
have not realized that these movies have shaped us and helped us grow into who we are today. These
movies have shaped us to help us face social issues, regular life problems, independence, having
empathy and more. This is a process called animating revolt in which Judith Halberstam touches
upon in her essay called "Animating Revolt and Revolting Animation". She analyzes and finds this
process in many Pixar films.
In an essay by Judith Halberstam "Animating Revolt and Revolting Animation" she talks about a
concept, animating revolt, and her meaning of it. She believes that animating revolt is when a
children's movie has relatable situations to society ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe that this underlies with a lot of points such as nature, overuse of technology, and the
environment. In the movie, Wall–e is trying to save the planet by cleaning up the environment so
humans can come back and live on it. This relates in today's society with how people recycle and
people do community work to keep the environment clean, people care for earth and they try to keep
it sanitary so it won't get polluted or things like that. Another example from Wall–e, would be with
the overuse of technology. When Wall–e goes to Axiom he sees all the obese people and this is
basically what the technology did to them. Technology did everything for them resulting in them
becoming obese, since they had to do no work. I also find this relatable to today's society because
people are obsessed with technology now a days. People are always on their phone, tablet, computer
etc. At the rate of how things are going, we could end up like Wall–e's situation. Children should see
that since they're the next generation, well they can have fun with technology but not overuse it
because they wouldn't want the planet to end up like it did in the

Essay on Analysis of The Revolt of Mother
Analysis of The Revolt of Mother
"The Revolt of 'Mother'" by Mary Wilkins Freeman, was a story of a woman who lived in New
England around or before the author's time. The mother, Sarah Penn, was kept out of the families
decisions by the father, Adoniram Penn, until one event that lead to her taking drastic actions while
her husband was gone. There are many religious symbols and actions taken by "Mother" within the
story. Through the story Sarah moved from a feeling of servitude to her husband, to a feeling that
she was in servitude to the Lords will and this led her, in the end, to hold power over her husband.
The religious overtones start with the title of the story, "The Revolt of 'Mother.'" The name 'Mother'
in many stories ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Sarah, on the other hand, is an interpreter of the Lords will.
Sarah comes to the conclusion that she is doing the Lords will when she declared the new maxim for
her self. She now believed that "Unsolicited opportunities are the guideposts of the Lord to the new
roads of life". She knows that this is an unsolicited opportunity because she had nothing to do with
Hiram sending notice of a good horse to father. It is also known that Sarah believes she is doing by
the Lords will because it is a providence to her; which is taken as her having divine foresight. This
foresight comes from her being a new spirit.
The sense that she is a new spirit is implied when she states, "I've let the fire go out"(528). Even
though she is talking about the stove, it is taken that it is a fire inside of her. The fire, which is a
means of destruction and chaos, was burning up her soul. And now that it was out a new spirit could
take over. The new spirit is also seen by Nanny when she "tremble(s), as if it were a ghost"(528).
This ghost that she feels is representative of the new spirit that has embodied mother. Because of
this new feeling both Sammy and Nanny seem to become something of religious followers to her.
The children as religious followers to Sarah are first clearly seen through the observation that "There
is a certain uncanny and superhuman quality about such a purely original undertakings as their

The English Peasant Uprising Essay
The English Peasant Uprising was motivated by a growing contempt with the government and
clergy following the Black Death which was finally set off by a series of immediate social and
economic causes. A shortage of workers followed the Black Death with an estimated forty–five per
cent of the population dying in England . As entire towns were either deserted or left devoid of life,
rural peasants increased their mobility into major cities. This shortage of rural workers led to famine
as fields were left to go fallow, placing further economic pressure on the peasant classes who
survived as the price of food increased. Due to the lack of labourers, the labourers who survived
demanded greater wages as they now had increased leverage over ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Schools of thought such as held by the Lollards, followers of theologian and reformer John Wycliffe
whom acted as lay preachers, were held responsible for the Uprising as they were critical of the
church as an institution, particularly the concept of the Church owning land. As these Lollards
travelled and preached their opposition to the Church as temporal power, they resonated with the
peasants and became increasingly popular as unlike many of the priests and monks recruited after
the Black Death, they were observed to be genuinely pious . The already solid dissatisfaction with
the clergy only intensified with the imprisonment of a highly popular Lollard, John Ball. John Ball
was imprisoned at Maidstone in Kent when he came into conflict with Simon of Sudbury
Archbishop of Canterbury for lay preaching. The Hundred Years war with France is still ongoing at
this point which was also adding further pressure to the lower classes due to the taxes needed to
fund it. The war was very expensive, which meant more taxes had to be put in place to compensate
for the lack of people paying taxes on account of forty–five per cent of tax payers being dead. Not
only were wages fixed by parliament, but parliament demanded more money from a populace
already financially struggling under fixed wages and inflated food prices. The stresses of the
Hundred Years War only intensified with the death of Edward III in 1377

Peasants Revolt
Assignment Two – HIST 304 | The Peasant's Revolt and The Decline of Serfdom | Why did the
Peasants' Revolt Occur? Did the insurgents hope to abolish serfdom? How and why did serfdom
decline and eventually disappear in England, notwithstanding the failure of the 1381 uprising and
other influences of lower class protest against social inequality and injustice? |
Naomi Woods Student 297278812/22/2011 |
The Peasants Revolt is one of the most well known revolts of Medieval England, the revolt began as
a local revolt in Essex in May of 1381, but it soon spread throughout the South East of England
affecting many smaller towns along the way and having the biggest impact on London when the
people turned their grievances towards the young ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Whatever the real story is to how he came to be a part of the revolt, people must have trusted and
seen something in Straw that said he could help them, as they followed him from a Churchyard
through the streets of Essex causing destruction as they moved. The Peasants Revolt was not just
confined to London, it spread to many other places in England. Each town had their own reasons for
the starting of the Revolt.
"The Peasants of Essex (as mentioned above) demanded the abolishment of serfdom among other
things.
The Peasants of Kent demanded there be no lordship in but the lordship of the king and that the
goods of the church be divided among the Parishioners, and that there be no villein in England.
The tenants of the Abbey of St. Albans, Hertfordshire, besieged the abbot, insisting on their rights to
hunt in the woods, fish in the river, grind their own corn at home, and sell land among themselves.
The tenants of Buy St. Edmunds, Suffolk, broke into the abbey and for a time extorted their liberties
from the abbot.
In Winchester, Hampshire and Beverly and Scarborough, Yorkshire, the unprivileged rose against
the privileged."
(History of England, Page 176–177)
According to Frossiart "at Canterbury the rebels entered the Church of St Thomas where they did

Revolt In Atlanta
After reading "The Politics of Race and Public Space: Desegregation, privatization, and the Tax
Revolt in Atlanta" by Kevin M. Kruse. I noticed many similarities in deindustrialization,
metropolitan fragmentation, and the rights revolution between the piece and what we have discussed
in class. Kruse states that when the desegregation of municipal spaces began to occur, everyone in
Atlanta had the freedom to live in the best place that they could afford. There was metropolitan
fragmentation, which is the segregating of a community into smaller municipal areas. White upper–
class Atlantans fled to more private areas such as suburbs while poor and mostly black people were
left with the city, effectively redlining the community.
When the wealthy white population left for the suburbs, they wanted to bring their money with
them. They didn't want to pay taxes for the inner city poor black society that they payed to get away
from. Therefore, there was a tax revolt where white people rebelled paying for the city taxes and
services where they no longer lived or benefit from services. This fragmentation led to some
resegregation as wealthy white people cohered in suburbs. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
A third of the city was black and black people could us only 3 out of 132 parks, 8 tennis courts of
127 that weren't lit at night, and no golf courses. Due to the metropolitan fragmentation, these
facilities were located in the white areas and funded by the white people. When the golf courses
were finally desegregated, it was highly resented. Only a few golf courses were desegregated at a
time and the white population was infuriated.When a group of fellow African Americans got
together to play a tournament, a "large contingent of aroused residents" marched to the mayor's
office and demanded a black man stop trying to hold a National Negro Gold

The Revolt Of Mother
American Realism: The Movement American Realism is defined as a literary movement in which
the author focused on writing about life as it actually was. Realist authors, such as William Dean
Howells, Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, and Charles Chesnutt, wrote about common life experiences
rather than on how one wanted their life to be like. The whole movement of American Realism
involved a transition of the reader's mind from the previous movement, American Romanticism.
American Romanticism focused on the ideal lifestyle involving imagination and emotion. Realistic
author's purpose in their writing was to get people to view life as it was when they woke up in the
morning. This is only one characteristic to define a work as realistic. Other characteristics ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Wilkins Freeman's, the author of "The Revolt of Mother," purpose in writing this story was to bring
awareness to feminism, which could also be the "Cult of Domesticity." The "Cult of Domesticity"
was a collection of attitudes that associated "true" womanhood with the home and family. Women
were to manage their homes, children, and husbands. They were not allowed to engage in hard labor,
political life, nor eth competitive individualism of the industrial economy, just like feminism. In the
story, Mother wants to know why were there men digging in the field and after she kept asking
Father, he told her that they were building a cellar for a new barn. She asked him why he would
build a barn when they needed a house but he did not answer and he left. She asked her son, Sammy,
what was Father going to do with the barn and he told her that Father was going to buy four cows.
Her actions of washing the dishes vigorously made it known that she was upset but she did not say a
word. While washing dishes, her daughter, Nanny, asks her if she thought it was too bad that Father
was building a new barn as much as they needed a house. Mother tells her that they are women and
women "know only what men–folks think we do, so far as any use of it goes, an' how we'd ought to
reckon men–folks in with Providence an' not complain of what they do any more than we do of the
weather," which means it's not a woman's place to question a man about his work even if she
disagrees. After dinner Mother had a talk with Father about a new house versus a new barn. She
stood her ground on why they needed another house by pointing out the flaws in the current house
such as limited space. Father did not answer Mother's question of whether he thought it was right to
build another barn when they needed a house. Instead he went back to the field. Time passes and
Father gets an opportunity to go to Vermont to buy a horse. While Father is away, Mother demanded
that the men not put anything in the new

The Spaniard Revolt
During the time of the Spaniard rule, the Indians were subjugated to not only the crown's law but
also to the Spaniards' religion. From the time that the Spaniards landed until the time Pueblo's revolt
took place the Indians were treated terribly. They were not only made into slaves but they were
starved, and treated with violence when the Spaniard friars began to convert the Indians to
Christianity. Spain wanted to become rich off American land but they also had another goal, to
convert the Indians religion. Because the Spaniards made the Indians into slaves, and believed them
barbaric in their religion, they did not see the Indians as equal and were treated horribly; until, Las
Casas began to write letters of the events and Popé became the leader of the Pueblo revolt.
The Spaniards that went to the new world were to convert the Indians to Christianity. The Spaniard
missionaries gave the Indians no choice but to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Indians that were under oppression from the Franciscan friars were infuriated and resented the
friars for the maltreatment of trying to convert them into "obedient Christian subjects of the crown"
(Foner, 2014, p. 25). However, they did not have a leader until Popé. Popé was whipped in public
and after this occurrence; he "began holding secret meetings in Pueblo communities" (Foner, 2014,
p. 34). Eventually the Indians rise up in 1680 with Popé as their leader. The revolt was a success and
the Spaniards left along with some of the converted Indians. When the Spaniards left the Indians
destroyed all the symbols that referred to the Spaniards. They "uprooted fruit trees, destroyed cattle,
burned churches and images of Christ and the Virgin Mary... 'the God of the Spaniards', they
shouted, 'is dead" ( Foner, 2014, p. 34). With the Spaniards gone, the Indians were no longer
subjected to the Spaniards trying to convert them in a harsh and violent

Revolt Of 1857

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Dawn Mora

More from Dawn Mora (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Revolt Of 1857