Theme Of Language In King Lear

Theme Of Language In King Lear
In a genre that contradicts a novelist's affluence of narrative explication, the language in its purest
form becomes Shakespeare's powerful instrument, wherein he controls it with the unusual
combination of force, subtlety, and exactitude"
In Act one, scene one, we are introduced to Gloucester and his parallel plot line before we
introduced to Lear. We find Gloucester acknowledging his equal adoration between his two sons, the
one legitimate, the other illegitimate. The moral code that informs King Lear dictates that
illegitimacy bodes nothing but a disadvantage to the harmony of underlying order . Within the terms
of the play, Gloucester's emotion is a fatal flaw of judgment. Paying close attention to language,
Gloucester's unwitting mistake from Edmund's very first appearance; in a world where the only
vocabulary of each character is a full expression of their position on the axis of good and evil, a
reader cannot help but notice that Edmund's "... I shall study deserving..."(I.i.24) is a foreboding of
the deceit and greed that will taint him for the rest of the play.
Lear's entry into the play is similar to Gloucester's such that, through close analysis of the dialogue
between the King and his daughters, the reader gains awful knowledge of the arrogance and
ignorance that will soon become his downfall . The drama of his opening speech is at all points
excessive; the reader discerns a man that is long accustomed to being listened to and indulged in
every way. In a moral
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Morality Of The Secondary Characters In William...
When watching a play or movie; the bombastic spotlight–hogging characters, often celebrities, are
the primary object of the audience's attention, often at the expense of attention towards secondary
characters who may be of equivalent importance to the plot. Likewise, within King Lear, attention
towards the secondary characters is often negated in favour of the more prevalent primary
characters. Despite this lack of attention, however, the secondary characters of Cornwall, the fool
and Kent all contribute extensively to the plot through their unique personalities and actions.
The character of Cornwall displays a wanton disregard for human dignity, enabling him to transform
the malevolent will of the other characters into action, without remorse for the human consequences
of them. Furthering the ascent of evil within the play. When Kent was the subject of Oswald and
Regan's contempt, Cornwall decided to take initiative, asking the others to "Fetch forth the stocks!
As I have life and honour there shall he sit till noon"(II.ii.122–123). Within that particular instance,
Cornwall is the only character with a sufficient disregard for human dignity to commit the act, the
only character willing to transform malevolent thoughts into concrete action. Further, Cornwall has
such disregard for humanity that he's able to shamelessly and gruesomely blind Gloucester with a
knife, one of the most painful means to do so, asserting to Glouster that "See't shalt thou never.
Fellows, hold

King Lear essay, exploring the notion of hope.
"By considering the dramatic effects of King Lear, evaluate the view that despite the appalling
suffering, the world of the play is not without hope."
In the world of King Lear, being a shakespearean tragedy, suffering, loss, and injustice are all factors
often expected before an audience enters the bottomless pit of complicated characters, varying
agendas, and Shakespearean english these productions usually employed. However, despite its
melancholy undertone and lack of warmer lighting gels on stage, King Lear is not without hope.
Shakespeare in Lear, presents the notion that characters in great authority force suffering upon
others in an effort to retain power, admiration, and status. Initially, Lear himself demonstrates this,
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This again portrays the notion that authority and all that follows leads to the lower statured
characters enduring unjust suffering, and that "nothing comes from nothing" (1:1:85) linking back to
the notion that suffering cant come from nothing.
Hope can also presented in King Lear, in the way in which directors stage the characters on set. In
one dramatic interpretation of the play, in act 1 scene 1, Lear is sat down solitary with Gonerill and
Regan at his side. This not only portrays the Kings increasing age, but also the manipulative power
Gonerill and Regan initially have over him. During this first scene we see the gap between Cordelia
and Lear increase progressively, again portraying a physical representation for their relationship and
love for one another growing further and further apart. After this distancing, Cordelia, positioned
front stage right, has both Kent, The Fool, and towards the end of the scene, France. The dramatic
effect of this is clear to the audience; it physically highlights the allegiances of the characters, and is
used also to portray other various notions in a more physical manner, one of which is hope.
Hope is presented in the way in which The Fool, Kent, and France side with Cordelia, implying to
the audience she is not alone in her banishment, and that perhaps these characters may

William Shakespeare 's King Lear
Shakespeare's King Lear has experienced numerous iterations over the past few centuries, with
various editors and writers revising the manuscript to fit their desires. The absence of a single
definitive edition has made the play a goldmine from which countless adaptions and stage
interpretations have emerged, as its situation allows for directors to take creative liberties with the
source material. For this reason, the quality of these productions tends to straddle between excellent
and mediocre. Thankfully, director Dennis Garnhum's rendition firmly stands in the former.
Sponsored by Polygon, in collaboration with Theatre Calgary, Garnhum's interpretation of King
Lear was performed at Bard on The Beach's Vanier Park stage on June 20, 2015. Dennis Garnhum is
not new to the theatre scene, having been an artistic director for Theatre Calgary for the past ten
years, and directing a number of plays such as Pride and Prejudice, Of Mice and Men and Twelfth
Night. His King Lear is the first presentation of the play that Theatre Calgary had ever done. In an
interview with Calgary Herald, Garnhum stated the reason for waiting so long was that "You don't
do King Lear until you have a true Lear. I'm appropriately terrified and delighted." This 'true Lear'
came in the form of heavyweight theatre actor, Benedict Campbell. In addition to a stellar cast, the
play had a skilled set of technicians and designers, such as the popular Canadian costume designer,
Deitra Kalyn and set designer,

Disrespect in The Sailor who Fell From Grace with the Sea...
Disrespect in The Sailor who Fell From Grace with the Sea and Wonderful Fool
Throughout various works of world literature, respect is a major concern amongst the characters.
This manifests itself in how the relationships between characters in the work are characterized.
Sometimes lack of proper respect can be an auxiliary cause for conflict, while in other cases it can
be the root of it. In Japanese culture, respect is considered very important in the relationships
between different people; for example, it is customary to bow to one's elders and respect those of
superior knowledge and ability. Failure to show such respect is taken offensively and considered
extremely disrespectful. This important concept of disrespect ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Contradicting these philosophies is the character of Gaston Bonaparte in Shusaku Endo's Wonderful
Fool. Gaston realizes that "I'm a fool ... a weakling!" and that his mental capacities are somewhat
limited (Endo 179). He is not offended when he is patronized; rather he is quite accustomed to it. He
is described as ". . . a coward, a simpleton, who had gone from one failure to the next. . . . From the
time he was a child Gaston too had always been laughed at and made fun of by his brothers and
friends" (Endo 73). His friends also nicknamed him 'poplar', because "In Gaston's native region of
Savoy, large men who are thought to be somewhat simple are called poplars. . . . the wood of the
poplar tree is not good for anything but matchsticks." (Endo 73). Gaston, since his friends and loved
ones mocked his stupidity and ridiculed him throughout his childhood and adolescence because of
this, accepts that he is intellectually inept and has limits on his mental capacities. Gaston is used to
being patronized and viewed as a simpleton; this allows him to better tolerate the disrespect that the
character Endo will give him throughout the novel.
Second Mate Ryuji Tsukazaki does not intentionally disrespect Noboru's genius, but

Twelfth Night Fool Essay
Danielle Pitch
Dr. Rettig
ENG 409: Shakespeare
29 November 2016
Fooling Around with Shakespeare's Twelfth Night In his famous comedy, Twelfth Night, William
Shakespeare took a conventional comedic concept and constructed a fool character that inserts an
intricacy and resonance to his work. This fool is completely placed distant from society and
moreover disregards or is unable to reflect the model of society in which he finds himself. The fool
is identified as the inferior in society, where he stands lower in the class system. Olivia states this
notion by saying "There is no slander in an allowed fool though he do nothing but rail" (I.v. 83–84).
The fool in Twelfth Night, Feste, whose insider–outsider position as a professional fool, supports
him to obtain steadiness among the surrounding contradictions in a way that is unlike any other
character in this play. He stuns and puzzles; persuades conjecture; and he works as a mediator
between the play and audience. As stated by Walter Kaiser, it is when Feste mocks the characters'
flaws and turns to his wits to "create laughter, to teach us the truth, and to embody paradoxes." By
walking on this fine line, Feste reveals the foolishness and truths of the other characters. The play
deals with all aspects with great segments of passionate love, sharp wordplay, and natural comedy,
which all indirectly help deem this play as "the greatest of all Shakespeare's pure comedies", by
most Shakespeare critics. The play's success,

King Lear Fool
Shakespeare's fools are more than just court jesters. Their purpose is to provide insight and wisdom,
which they often do in a witty manner. In King Lear, by William Shakespeare, the Fool behaves as a
symbol for King Lear's rationality and sanity. Throughout the play, Lear's rationality and sanity
quickly diminishes; causing a transformation into a literal fool. After the storm, Lear's sanity and
rationality completely disappear and Lear completes his transformation into the literal fool. The
Fool is not present for the remainder of the play because Lear no longer has rationality and sanity. In
King Lear, King Lear's rationality is physically manifested as the Fool; therefore, instead of King
Lear partaking in any rational behavior, the Fool ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Fool's purpose is to remove Lear from this dream–like state by trying to force Lear to face the
reality of his current predicament. When Lear gave away his kingdom to his daughters, he gave up
the right to be treated as a king, which is the reason that Oswald called Lear "My lady's father"
instead of King Lear (I.iv.74). However, this reminds Lear that he is no longer King Lear, but
instead just a father with little to no power or authority. This realization became too much to bear for
Lear, causing him to behave irrationally by striking Oswald. In this situation, Lear was being
moronic for striking Oswald; since he, by technicality, did not own any property and reduced
himself to existing as only a father instead of a property owning king. Lear willingly gave up all
rights as a king. Therefore, he gave up all rights to be treated as royalty making his actions toward
Oswald, who gave Lear the respect he deserves, foolish. After this irrational action the Fool, Lear's
rationality, reappears to remind Lear that he had no right to strike Oswald and calls Lear "a bitter
fool" since he gave away all "other titles"(I.iv.133,138). This scolding shows that the Fool is the
symbol for Lear's rationality and as Lear's rationality, the Fool is required to humble Lear when he
forgets his place. Lear rationally knows that he was foolish when he gave up all of his rights to be
treated like a king. Therefore, Lear does not argue against the Fool when he brazenly reminds Lear
that he may be "a Fool", but Lear is "nothing" (I.iv.175,176). Lear is behaving irrationally because
he is unable to accept that he no longer holds any power or prestige. Since the Fool is the symbol for
Lear's rationality it would only make sense that only he would directly remind Lear of his current

How Is King Lear Wise
One of the most famous and comedic lines the Fool says in King Lear is "Thou shouldst not have
been old till thou hadst been wise" referring to our societal assumption that old people are wise.
(1.5.38–39). But the Fool bluntly points out that King Lear is not wise in how he splits his kingdom.
King Lear's fatal mistake is that he believes that someone's love can be measured by words. In Act 3
Scene 2, King Lear has his pivot point where he begins to learn about real love. He is old, and now
is becoming wise as his "wits begin to turn" (3.2.66). Right after he declares his descent into
madness, he asks his Fool how he is doing–the first time Lear has shown general curiosity for
someone's well being. As he assumes this motherly role of taking

The Role Of The Fool In King Lear
In the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, the Fool is introduced as an lower–class character as
he acts carefree and speaks in riddles. However, the Fool's role in the play is not as plain and simple
as it seems. Considering the Fool's excellent relationship to Lear, he plays a significant role in
supporting Lear's sanity, thus he has the time to figure out the truths. The Fool takes on the
important role of sustaining Lear's sanity by staying loyal to Lear, providing comic relief to Lear,
and teaching Lear of his faults.
First, the Fool's loyalty to Lear drives Lear away from hopelessness, knowing that someone is
always on his side. The Fool is loyal to Lear because he cares about Lear's well–being even when
Lear is delirious and because Lear depends upon the Fool's service. As an illustration, when Lear is
locked out in the rain by his daughter, the Fools comments, "O nuncle court holy water in the dry
house is/ better than this rain outdoor," (Shakespeare. III. II 13–14). This demonstrates that the Fool
genuinely cares about Lear's well–being, despite his idiocy of trusting his daughter. Additionally, in
this scene, King Lear acts forlorn as his daughters left him out in the rain, and this proves that the
Fool will be at his side even through his depression. Moreover, Lear allows the Fool to be loyal to
him instead of pushing away his loyalty as he did with Cordelia; unlike Lear's daughter, the Fool has
a much lower standard to be held by. As stated by Viera de Jesus, "Unlike his [the Fool's] fellows in
other plays, he is nameless, with no more distinguishing badge of individuality than plain 'Fool.'"
Therefore, Lear will always rely on his Fool to be his "King's Fool" no matter how uncanny he acts
because his label as Fool, which is a label for someone of a lower class, allows his actions to be
justified. Therefore, the Fool supports Lear through his loyalty because he advises Lear to care for
himself and because Lear entreats the Fool to stay on his side.
Second, the Fool provides comic relief to Lear which helps stabilize his emotions. The Fool
provides comic relief through his playful speech and his light–hearted character. Specifically,
evidence of the Fool's comic relief at work is seen in Act

Who Is A Fool In Twelfth Night
"Those who wish to appear wise among fools, among the wise seem foolish." (Quintilian) Being
wise is all in the context of the situation, a man who is seen as wise by fools, is viewed as foolish to
wiser men. Shakespeare uses two words to show this idea, a witty fool, and a foolish wit. A witty
fool is someone who is smart but foolish, whereas a foolish wit is someone who actions are foolish
yet they themselves are smart. In the play "Twelfth Night" a comedy by William Shakespeare, Feste
is depicted as a witty fool, a smart but foolish man, because, his wisdom shown through his shrewd
comments, his witty language, and his jocose interactions with other characters. Throughout the
play, Feste uses quick–witted comments, that show his intelligence ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"Beshrew me, the knight's in admirable fooling." (2.3.81) As a result of Feste's actions while with a
character called Andrew Aguecheek, Feste states that Andrew is with the best fool. Throughout the
play, Feste implicates himself as a witty fool and often states that he is no foolish wit. In addition,
Feste uses his interaction skills to mock other characters for being fools just like him. "These wise
men that give Fools money get themselves a good report."(4.1.22–23) Furthermore Feste while
talking to a Count states that if he keeps paying, then the count will always have a good report from
Feste. Once again this shows that Feste's interaction with other characters clearly concur that Feste
is, in fact, a witty fool, his interaction shows him joking and being the perfect witty fool. Another
big aspect of Festes interactions with other characters is his knowledge of the outside world. For
instance, Feste states, "... I profit in the knowledge of myself..." (5.1.17). Although Feste is a fool he
is extremely smart and undoubtedly is witty, he understands that no matter who you are you have to
be able to understand yourself for who you are, in his case a witty fool. Throughout the play, Feste
uses key character interaction to not only tell us about another character but himself as a character.
In short, through Festes interactions with other characters, Feste

The Outsider in Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea...
The "Outsider" in Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea and Wonderful Fool
The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea Wonderful Fool In designing the characters in a novel,
frequently, an author includes a character who finds himself on the outside of the accepted society.
This outsider character often finds himself at a disadvantage. The mere fact that he is unfamiliar in
his society tends to create problems for the character to solve. After solving these problems, the
character leaves behind a lasting effect on at least one other character, both of whom have changed
dramatically due to the influence of the outsider.
In Yukio Mishima's novel The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea, the character Ryuji
Tsukazaki ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ryuji's discontent with land was quite evident while he spent time with Ryuji and Fusako. Having
never had a strong family, Ryuji felt out of place in their household.
As he first became assimilated into Noboru's life, Ryuji felt on the outside, unaccepted and
disapproved of by Noboru. In the beginning, in an attempt to downplay his manhood Noboru
described the sailor as "not such a big man" (Mishima 11). As the novel progresses, largely due to
the influence of the gang, Noboru grows to hate Ryuji, and further the gap between Ryuji and
Noboru. For Ryuji, this lack of respect exhibited by Noboru is devastating. Ryuji sensed Noboru's
need to have a "real man" as a role model, and spent his time attempting to build the bridge between
the two, and manufacture a bond which both of them were satisfied with. In a backfired attempt to
bond with Noboru, Ryuji tries to impress Noboru and his gang by attempting to relate to their
youthfulness. He tries to show the he, too, could go to the park and have a good time, just as the
boys could. However, the problem only worsened due to this action. Noboru was so appalled that
Ryuji would do such a thing as to admit to his taking a bath in a fountain. He imagined Ryuji living
up to his courageous reputation and offering as an anecdote "I rescued a woman who had thrown
herself off the pier"

Examples Of Respect And Honesty In King Lear
There is one constant throughout the play, the absence of rank. King Lear is set up in a kingdom–
like manner, through which an attitude of respect and honesty is expected from the characters. Yet,
to the demise of many of the characters, this expected attitude is only portrayed through a few of
them. When this attitude of respect and honesty is not portrayed, it is not looked upon as odd or out
of character, it is almost normalized. The king goes mad, Kent breaks a stereotype, Gloucester is
naïve nature, Edmund as a master of manipulation, and the fool portraying the most knowledgeable
of all. The first character to whose attitude portrays this oddity is the king. King Lear goes mad, he
completely loses all sense of sanity he had ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Cooley discusses the "stereotype" of a "Man of Kent" in his journal, "Kent and the Primogeniture in
'King Lear.'" He shows how originally Kent fits this well–known stereotype of the day, he appears as
"the volatile yet supremely loyal counselor, who insists it is his duty to be 'unmannerly/when Lear is
Mad.'" (Cooley 328) as Cooley identifies later in his journal, Kent completely breaks this stereotype.
He, instead of agreeing with the distribution of Lear's kingdom, disagrees and combats the decision.
This decisive action molds the eye through which we see Kent, and instead of a "loyal counselor"
we see a contemporary thinker. Kent even has some mystery in his plot as well, he has some private
contact with this "gentleman." This private life of such a seemingly honest and open character is
strange and unusual. Kent 's actions and choices push the play into a more contemporary light,
allowing for more complexity to be observed. The next character with an odd attitude throughout the
play is Gloucester. He was very proud to speak on an adulterous affair he had and the outcome,
Edmund, from it. He, for an advisor of the king, was seemingly naïve throughout the play. He didn't
see through Edmund's lies and from his ignorance of the inner workings he was blinded and sent off
to wander. Being blinded is interesting and hold some major significance. As Halio points out,
"'blinding, particularly the tearing out of eyes, is, as

The Fool In Shakespeare's Twelfth Night
The Fool in Shakespeare's Twelfth Night is more intelligent than most of the other characters in the
play. When talking to Olivia, and attempting to make her laugh, he turns her words against her. As
she demands his removal, he says, "Do you not hear fellows, take the lady away" (Page 29). Though
she carries power over him, the fools wit is more powerful than hers. Olivia's disposition leads the
fool to wonder why she is mourning. Once Olivia mentions the death of her brother, the Fool bluntly
states that "his soul is in hell." Olivia responds with her belief that his soul is, instead, in heaven.
The Fool, because of his intellect, knew she would reply with her answer; thus proving her
mourning to be fruitless.
In Act 2, while joking around

The Power Of Language In Shakespeare's King Lear
It is often troublesome to infiltrate into a work of such total and astonishing brilliance as King Lear.
Reading Shakespeare can, sometimes, seem to be construed as an insincere activity, performed only
to impress literature enthusiasts. But, there are times when one goes over entries that, by the sheer
power of their lyrical, graceful magnificence, jump off the page and reverberate so unequivocally
inside one's mind that they turn into a sort of refining of the whole play. One can read King Lear
over and over, and still be struck once more by Shakespeare's absolute dominance over language;
without a doubt, no other author had so full a feeling of, and who used to such harsh ends, the power
of words. In a genre that contradicts a novelist's affluence of narrative explication, the language in
its purest form becomes Shakespeare's powerful instrument, wherein he controls it with the unusual
combination of force, nuance, and exactitude.
In Act one, scene one, we are introduced to Gloucester and his parallel plot line before we
introduced to Lear. We discover Gloucester recognizing his equal adoration between his two sons,
the one legitimate, the other illegitimate. The ethical code that illuminates King Lear directs that
wrongness bodes only a weakness to the harmony of underlying order. Within the terms of the play,
Gloucester's adoration is a lethal imperfection of judgment. Giving careful consideration to
language, Gloucester's unwitting mistake from Edmund's first

Essay on The Redemption of King Lear
The Redemption of King Lear?
Shakespeare's play, King Lear is quite renowned and the folly of the ancient King is a
great example of how not to handle family relationships. The question has been proposed
if King Lear is redeemed when reunited with Cordelia. King Lear does achieve a kind of
redemption when he is reunited with Cordelia in Acts IV and V of the tragedy. What kind
of redemption he achieves is open to interpretation. In order to understand the King's
redemption, it must be determined what the King is redeemed from. Once this sin is
established, an analysis can be made as to when the King is redeemed, and how. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
. .
Here I disclaim all my paternal care,
Propinquity and property of blood
And as a stranger to my heart and me
Hold thee, from this, for ever. The barbarous Scythian,
Or he that makes his generation messes
To gorge his appetite, shall to my bosom
Be as well neighbored, pitied, and

Examples Of Psychological Conflict At Lear
In fact, the psychological conflict at Lear is the result of weakness and lack of awareness of what he
does because he was selfish, arrogant and does not listen to the advice of those close to his Kingdom
as a result; he banishes Kent out of the kingdom because he stands against his incorrect decisions.
which is against his daughter and the right division of the Kingdom in addition to the foolish tried
bitterness and reluctance to ignorance avoid sin but he was stubborn, proud, selfishness, and
insensitive. He does not know what to do because of his foolishness and weak personality as a
result, one may think, Lear, reached to the madness because he was inflicted by the conflict between
the reason and passion that led him to sense ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Shakespeare seems to stress his independence of the medieval idea of tragedy and shows in the true
Renaissance spirit that man is an architect of his fate and not a victim of the blind goddess fortune.
(Frnaham,1963:18). In Act I. Scene I, it seems that the blindness begins in Lear's selfishness and
makes him blind to see the reality of his daughters, he is unaware of the fear and hatred that Goneril
and Regan have for him as a consequence of his preference for Cordelia. His physician and
consultant Kent gives him the following advice: see better, Lear: see better, Lear (I.i.14). In addition,
Kent implies that Lear is blinded–blind to see the fact that Cordelia is the loyal daughter while
Goneril and Regan are the evil spawn. So it can be said that the roots of all Lear's problems are his
lack of good judgment and blindness. Mr. D. G. James in The Dream of Learning has observed

King Lear Poverty
The Tragedy of King Lear, is an epitaph of a fading old King. This is a play about old age; rather
than the rise and fall of youth. Death is the finale of every human; this is what makes life so fruitful.
The task to accomplish for the elderly is to have their youth bear the memory of their flesh; so that
their life is not forgotten. The responsibility of any father is to improve the quality of life for their
children. The purpose of this assignment is to argue that The Tragedy of King Lear demonstrates
how poverty and weakness can bring a person to empathy and appreciation of life. Wealth, emotions
and appearance can distort judgement. Arrogance can be easily gained through wealth and
contaminate a person's thoughts and perception. The play begins near the retirement and end of
Lear's life. This initiates a tone in the play where the knowledge of Lear's death is foreshadowed.
Lear had decided to divide his empire into sections for his trusted successors. The passing of his
land into younger hands was meant to plant the seeds of his legacy. Lear thought that he could see
into ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The allure of wealth spoiled Gonerill and Regan. They both did not know the value and the
hardships of fermenting wealth and the stability of life. Lear became monomaniac about the illusion
of wealth. Lear came to his senses through misery and the loss of Cordelia. Absurdity was seen
through the eyes of his Fool. The Fool knew that Lear was the person who was manipulated. The
fool knew as well; that Lear was tricked by his daughters. The fool attempted to illustrate to Lear
through songs that he was completely oblivious about his own life. "That lord that copunsell'd thee
To give away thy land, Come place him here by me, Do thou for him stand. The sweet and bitter
fool Will presently appear: The one in motley here, The other found out." (Shakespeare, trans. 1963,

Essay about William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night: Feste
Trevor Nunn's (1996) adaptation of Twelfth Night illustrates the complexity of Feste's character and
how important he is to the overall play. Ben Kingsley, the actor, presents Feste as sympathetic and
gentle choric figure. It is Feste who allows the audience to see the films respect for the original play,
and the existing issues within it. This includes the defencelessness of women, and the attractive, but
dangerous, qualities of altering one's true sexual identity. Interestingly, unlike the original script,
Nunn opens his first scene with Feste observing Viola struggle to shore after the shipwreck she has
experienced. In this context, Kingsley's Feste is revealed for the first time. He is shown as a
mysterious and isolated individual, who ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This compassion for Olivia is extended throughout the film to include two other female characters;
Viola and Maria. He cares for these women and envisions them in a happier state. It's evident that
there is more than meets the eye when Feste's status is concerned. He may be labelled as a fool, but
indeed his unique intelligence makes the individuals around him the fools. His title of "fool" gives
him employment in order to survive, and nothing more. However, as stated above, it does not
describe who he is truly by mind, heart and soul. He is intelligent, gentle, and empathetic especially
with his lady Olivia. In her court Feste is more than an average jester; he is a member of her family
who, unlike the rest of her servants, has the freedom to roam as he pleases. After she suffers the loss
of her father and brother, Feste is the most important figure in her life. He became her father and
brother, caring and watching over her. For this reason, when he takes advantage of his freedom,
remaining absent for days, Olivia becomes furious with him. This is particular in scene one–act five,
when Feste attempts to regain her trust with his intelligent humour. Clown. Good madonna, why
mourn'st though? Olivia. Good Fool, for my brother's death Clown. I think his soul is in hell,
madonna Olivia. I know his soul is in heaven, fool Clown. The more fool, madonna, to mourn for
your brother's soul, being in heaven. Take away

The Use Of Trickery In Chaucer'sThe Canterbury Tales Essay?
In society, deception, cunningness, and other uses of trickery are quite common. Whether these
themes are seen easily or are placed more discreetly, they are found in society often. Simply take a
look at any political ad, certain sexual assault cases, or any form of social media, especially dating
apps such as Tinder and Bumble. More often than not, political advertisements, sexual assault cases,
and social media involve extraordinary amounts of deception, cunning words, and lies to call
someone to a certain action. Political advertisements contain propaganda to push a political view.
Sexual assault cases frequently begin with cunning, seductive words used to draw someone into an
act they do not desire to commit. Social media is possibly the most common form of deception as
countless amounts of people edit their photos to attain a desired body image or skin tone, essentially
cat–fishing anyone who follows them. Furthermore, deception and cunningness are not only
common in society, but is also present in literature in several ways. In Geoffrey Chaucer's epic
poem, "The Canterbury Tales," Chaucer uses seduction, craftiness, and trickery as a form of
persuasion, revenge, and to prove tricks do not come without consequences. In both "The Miller's
Tale" and "The Reeve's Tale," Chaucer uses deception and cunningness as a form of persuasion. In
"The Miller's Tale," Nicolas utilizes his cunningness to persuade Alison to have an affair with him.
As he begins flirting with her,

Examples Of Blindness In King Lear
The Blindness in King Lear To be blind is to lack perception, awareness, discernment, or being
unable to see; blindness is a recurring theme and motif throughout the entire play. Throughout the
play, there are multiple instances where a character is blind to the repercussions of their actions and
their effects on others. Shakespeare shows the concept of blind trust and fear causing people to be
caught up in their emotions before taking a close look at things and seeing the truth, Shakespeare
also uses this to create irony, because by the time his characters see the truth, it is too late for them
to be saved because plans for their fate are already in motion, killing them. Shakespeare's characters
are too caught up in their emotions to think clearly and are then blind by emotions to closely
examine the situation and the big picture and are tricked by ignorance while seeking pleasure and
gratification. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Regan and Goneril flatter Lear, pleasing Lear with their flattery, while Cordelia is honest in her
declaration of love for her father. Lear feels that Cordelia is too prideful to demonstrate her love for
him as her elder sisters have done. In an argument, Lear feel disrespected resulting in the removal of
her dowry and family ties; Regan and Goneril are given what would have been Cordelia's share as
well as all of Lear's authority and wealth. This

Essay on Lear's Character in William Shakespeare's Play
Lear's Character in William Shakespeare's Play The view of Lear being bent on his own destruction
from the beginning of the play is an acceptable claim. The way he begins in the play, dividing up his
country for his daughters, in essence, this spelt disaster. Unlike other renaissance dramatists, who
used 'mad scenes' for comic use, Shakespeare seems intent on displaying madness in a more sinister
portrayal. In favour of the claim, much can be said. In his thought process of dividing up his
kingdom, it would appear, that nothing went through his mind to make him question what he was ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The behaviour of Lear with his followers differs throughout the novel. To begin with, his devout
followers such as Kent and Gloucester, pious and virtuous to the king, as were the masses which
served him. But as the play progresses, he loses his masses, because he loses his crown. But,
throughout the novel, Kent remains loyal to the king. Lear behaves (laddish) with his knights, they
go out and hunt: spend all day out in the country, and return demanding Food and care. Such
childlike behaviour is this, that Goneril has an outburst at her father, she says; "Men so disordered
...that this, our court... Shows like a riotous inn"
===================================================================
Goneril then says; "...epicurism and lust Makes it more like a tavern or a Brothel" Anchoring the
facet that Lear, with his knights is childish. Goneril speaks her mind of what Lear, claiming the
manner of the knights, and indeed her father, resemble that of a brothel. Lear claims outrage at his
daughter, curses, and leaves for Regan's residence. This shows Lear in a very bad light, although
being the king. He shows no maturity or leadership, he is simply one of the lads. Subsequent to this
argument with Goneril, Lear bears a grudge on his daughter, and shows utmost maturity when
saying farewells, as he curses his daughter.

Examples Of Guilt In King Lear
In the beginning of act 3, scene 2, of Shakespeare's King Lear, Lear and the Fool are outside in a
storm having been thrown out of his daughter's castle. Lear is outraged, while fool attempts to make
Lear see reason and reconcile with his daughters to get back inside. Lear, like in much of the play,
sees himself as the victim, and refuses to acknowledge any wrongdoing on his part. Shakespeare
uses this scene to accentuate Lear's hubris, and show his inability to accept guilt for what has
transpired in the play. In Lear's opening lines, he is irate nearly to the point of being incoherent. He
encourages the weather to continue to torment him. He says "Blow winds, and crack your cheeks!
rage! blow!" (III,ii,1) The lack of capitalization after the exclamation points displays Lear's lack of
thought due to his anger. His diction is of a very violent nature, using verbs such as rage, drench'd,
cleaving, and singe. This violence echos what he feels has been done to him by his daughters. He
feels hard done by to have been deceived by Goneril and Regan. While it was his inflated ego which
allowed him to be deceived so easily, he refuses to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He admits that he should expect nothing more from nature, as he has done nothing to deserve it's
kindness. However, he attack's his daughters for being equally cruel, after having been given
everything by their father. Lear says "I tax not you, you elements, with unkindness; I never gave you
kingdom, call'd you children, you owe me no subscription" Lear is still unsure as to why his
daughters treat him with such distain, when he has given them so much. He once again fails to
realize that he has a loving and grateful daughter, who he banished for not professing her love when
called upon. He brought all this pain on himself by allowing his hubris to cloud his judgement, but
maintains that he is nothing but an innocent

Thought Communication in The Sailor Who Fell from Grace...
Thought Communication in The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea and Wonderful Fool
In the novels The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea, by Yukio Mishima, and Wonderful Fool,
by Shusaku Endo, the authors write in a way which allows the characters to speak directly to the
reader through thoughts. This device lets the reader know exactly what the character is experiencing.
Mishima and Endo's use of direct thought communication proves to be a beneficial aspect that aids
the reader in understanding these works of literature. Both authors use this literary technique to
clearly express to the readers the true thoughts and feelings of the characters; in turn allowing the
reader to realize and understand the changes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ryuji's change is a result of his having to choose between a life at sea, where he feels his glory
awaits him, or a life on land with Fusako. Ryuji's introspection on his life and glory are conveyed to
the reader through his expression of boredom and disillusionment. At dawn of New Year's Day,
Ryuji stands at the dock with Fusako and thinks about his being, "tired to death of the squalor and
the boredom in a sailor's life . . . There was no glory to be found, not anywhere in the world"
(Mishima 111). The reader now has a clear picture of Ryuji's emotions towards his current situation
and an understanding of Ryuji's discovery of what he wants; a life on land. Ryuji's lack of interest in
the life of a sailor is conveyed to the reader through Mishima's application of the literary technique
of allowing the character's thoughts to be clear. Ryuji's contemplation on the subject of leaving the
sea is important because it permits the reader to understand why Ryuji takes the course of action he
later follows. Similarly, it aids the reader in realizing the change Ryuji has undergone.
Ryuji's final opinion on his life and his true ideas about himself are brought to the reader's attention
in his ponderance over the decision to leave his life at sea. While waiting with the gang on the
afternoon of his murder, Ryuji thinks, "I could have been a man sailing away forever. He had been
fed up

How Is Malvolio A Foolish Character
Often foolishness can be defined as, the lack of good judgement and sense, which is associated with
jesters or clowns usually for comedic effect. In stark contrast, in Twelfth Night reader's find that
those in position of power with stereotypically serious roles are portrayed as foolish for comedic
effect, whereas the court fools, are portrayed as intelligent. This is largely representational
throughout Malvolio, as he is a character of somewhat high class, yet he still portrays the traits of a
foolish man. He can't see the obvious discrepancies between the letters request and Oliva reactions
to his behaviour. This being said one finds that, in Shakespeare's play Twelfth Night Malvolio can
be seen as the most foolish character due to his inability to see through thinly veiled lies ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
George 02 Primarily, Malvolio is described as a very ignorant character who cannot take a joke, his
ignorance then leaves him as an easy target for other characters to insult him. In Twelfth Night, Sir
Toby, Sir Andrew, and Maria all plot a scheme that involves forging Olivia's handwriting in a letter,
making Malvolio believe that she is in love with him. His quick belief of Oliva's love towards him,
is due to his personality. Seeing as his personality essentially makes the prank work, with a change
of his character, said incident would cease to exist. Malvolio is a very serious character, who thinks
of himself more superior than others. This is evident when he says, "Go, hang yourselves all! You
are idle shallow things: I am not your element: you shall know more hereafter."(Act 3 , Scene 4).
This quote effectively shows readers that Malvolio thinks that he is

Shakespeare's Fool Research Paper
Shakespeare's Fool is often the sole character who avoids being sucked into the dramatic maelstrom
that engulfs other characters. Fools make jokes and can be relatively easy to pass over. It is as
though they are saying – laugh away and ignore the man telling jokes. However, their jokes hold the
key to some of Shakespeare's beliefs and outlook on life. They reveal his existential musings such as
"who are we?" and "what is the meaning of it all?". Fools try to answer these questions at the same
time as they amuse audiences. Shakespeare's Fool suggests one is better off laughing at and with the
more difficult aspects of the human condition.
There are two primary types of fools in Shakespeare's work: Fools and fools. Marked Fools are
characters unto themselves, but fools ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These our actors, As I foretold you, were all spirits and Are melted into air, into thin air; And like the
baseless fabric of this vision, / ... shall dissolve; / And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, / Leave
not a rack behind. We are such stuff / As dreams are made on, and our little life / Is rounded with a
sleep."
Macbeth briefly revisits this thought: "Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and
frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound
and fury, signifying nothing."
This latter was seen by some as a negative philosophy. George Bernard Shaw termed it
"Shakespeare's despair." (cited in Eastman, 172–173, 165). But Shakespeare does not present
despair as a forgone conclusion. Foolish "wits" like Macbeth, Jacques and Prospero take themselves
too seriously, while the Fool is an astute observer and commentator on the proceedings he is witness
to. Are any of these characters real? From the point of view of the audience, Hamlet, the visiting
troupe he engages to perform the play within a play and Fools are all actors playing their particular
roles. Are they really any different from one

Comparing The Fool In Shakespeare's 'King Lear And The Storm'
December 3rd, 2014
Diego Martinez
AP–English Lit.
Ms. White
A Fool trapped in a Storm
In William Shakespeare's "King Lear", one of the most iconic scenes is when King Lear is fighting
off a storm with the fool, right after being banished by both his daughters in the scene prior. Not
only is this scene iconic, but thought provoking as well. It is during this popular scene that the
reader can realize how the fool and the storm are actually the physical representation of what
happens inside King Lear's mind at that specific point within the play.
Since the beginning of the play, the fool barely leaves the king's side, due to the fact that his job is to
bring Lear humor and laughter. But the fool brings more than that to Lear, proving that he could be a
representation of the king's conscience. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although at the beginning, Cordelia is banished for telling Lear the truth, the fool is the only
character who is able to tell the king what he really thinks and feels with no particular consequence.
We also can examine the fact that Cordelia and the Fool are never in the same scenes, and could be
because Lear admires them both mutually and greatly. During the storm scene, the fool not only tells
Lear what he truly thinks, explaining to him how "He that has and a little tiny wit, With heigh–ho,
the wind and the rain..." (3.2.81–82), but also serves as a supporter through Lear's time in need,
insisting that he "ask thy daughters' blessing" (3.2.14), in exchange for shelter and safety. The fool
gives the scene a bit of logic and sanity, when at the same time; we are watching the protagonist
descend into madness. It is also important to realize that the author created this character to contrast
Lear's actions, and exemplify how Lear should be

Fool King Lear
In this world, people have this natural desire to protect the people they love and care for in their
lives. This need can manifest in many ways, at times it comes across as the harsh criticism of a
parent and other times it is the helping hand of a best friend or lover. In Shakespeare's King Lear, the
Fool plays as the protective role toward his master Lear. The Fool uses humour and sarcasm to try
and push Lear to make the smart decision and the Fool acts as his voice of reason, although Lear
tends not to fully comprehend his lessons. Not only does the Fool offer a sense of comic relief for
the audience, but his witty lines have a more protective and caring attitude underlying them. The
Western society has an innate tendency to let their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These fools tended to be quite intelligent and despite their crude humour and sarcastic lines, they
could be very philosophical at times. In King Lear, by Shakespeare, the audience meets the Fool
who plays a wise role toward Lear, even though he was supposed to be the more foolish of the two.
In between his jokes and jabs, the Fool shows how much he cares for Lear and does whatever he can
to try and bring Lear back from insanity. Not only is the Fool in the play for the need of a few witty
lines, but he also proves to be one of the most loyal and protective of Lear's subjects. He does not
have a large amount of lines in the play, and when Cordelia comes back, he disappears completely.
It is a possibility that the Fool represents Lear's rational mind or that Lear creates him out of need
for that mothering, protective figure. His past and future is never touched on, instead he just simply
exists in the play until he is not needed any further. "He is fated never to have been or to become
anything or anyone other than what he eternally is. The Fool incarnates the stasis of Being
impervious to the flux of Becoming." (Seiden,

Twelfth Night Fool
In response to the statement above, my answer is that Feste could sometimes be considered the
actual fool whereas sometimes people think of him as the 'paid fool'. Malvolio could be the hidden
fool in Twelfth Night as he is the butt of most of the characters jokes and is there for the audience's
entertainment in my eyes. So in response I agree to an extent with the statement 'Malvolio is the real
fool of Twelfth Night'.
The word fool has many meanings. Most of which are referred to in twelfth night. It could mean "A
silly person", or "One who professionally is a fool for their profession", or "A person who has little
or no reason/ intellect", or "A person who is made to be a fool". I think Malvolio can be portrayed as
a fool using these ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He could be seen as a hidden fool as Feste is considered as the paid fool in the play. Malvolio is
used for the other characters' entertainment ,especially Sir Toby and Andrew Aguecheek, as he is so
grave and is against anything frivolous and fun. The other characters like to poke fun at Malvolio
and tease him, they like to see how he reacts to their foolish behaviour.
I also think that Shakespeare uses Malvolio's being in the play to apply contrast against the other
characters, especially Toby and Andrew who are always merry (although this may be because of
their excessive drinking habits which cause the behaviour) but Malvolio in relation is much more
reserved and solemn in parts of the play.
Malvolio does or can come across as a bit foolish in some parts of the play for example when Maria
and Toby trick him with the fake love letter and trick him into wearing yellow stockings etc. This is
one of the only scenes in which Malvolio does not seem as sceptical or cautious as he usually is. He
seems to truly believe Olivia sent him a love letter which was also foolish of him to believe as he
knows Olivia is grieving over the recent deaths in her family and is not courting any suitors in
respect to her father and

Brilliant Folly: the Role of Feste
In William Shakespeare 's comedy Twelfth Night, it is ironic how many times the fool is said to be
dishonest, when, in fact, his role proves entirely opposite. Though sometimes the characters do not
realize his hidden messages, the reader can instantly comprehend Feste 's figurative language, which
is evident in every scene in which the fool appears. Whether he is singing to Orsino, arguing with
Malvolio, or playing around with Viola, Feste always manages to sneak in a few symbolic
foretokens before his exit. His keen eye and fast wit help him to actively partake in the portrayal of
the story, however, the fool is merely present to express that which cannot be fully expressed
through the lines of other characters. Through his songs, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Feste 's common, witty remarks show the reader many significant truths about life in Illyria, and she
can also apply them to her own experiences.
Feste 's quick ability to play on the words of others also helps him illustrate his views on many
subjects. After Olivia commands the fool be taken away because he is dry, meaning not amusing,
Feste slyly twists her words with a good pun. "For give the dry fool drink, then is / the Fool not dry"
(1.5.41–42). His artfulness amuses Olivia, and the fool is allowed to stay. Also, while they are
speaking to each other, Feste and Viola hold a conversation consisting entirely of wordplay.
"Viola: Save the, friend, and thy music. Dost thou live by the tabor?
Fool: No, sir, I live by the church.
Viola: Art thou a churchman?
Fool: No such matter, sir. I do live by the church, for I do live at my house, and my house doth stand
by the church" (3.1.1–7).
Here, the fool 's words help Viola realize how important diction is, and also how deceiving it can be.
This awareness helps her to choose her words more carefully from that point on. Though his reasons
for using puns vary each time, their collective message is best summed up by Feste himself when he
states, "A sentence is/ but a chevril glove to a good wit. How quickly the/ wrong side may be turned
outward" (3.1.11–13).
Through Feste 's clever use of language, he takes on a role separate from his character. Although he
partakes in

Examples Of Madness In King Lear
Lear, however, is not the only person showing signs of lunacy throughout the play. Numerous
characters develop traits of madness or adopt them to their character to better survive. In a sense,
madness becomes a means of survival to several of the people involved in the troubles of their king.
Though perhaps not driven to complete madness, both Goneril, Regan and Edward show deranged
and uncontrolled desires motivating them to murder, betrayal, divorcement and suicide. Even more
interestingly, Edgar takes up the role of Poor Tom pretending to be mad as to be avoided by people
who might recognise him. It also allows him to accompany his father without revealing his identity.
Whilst he is the only one to actually pronounce himself truly mad, he is actually the only one not to
suffer from any damage to his sanity as he merely uses it as a cloak of disguise. Likewise, Lear's
companionable fool acts in contrast to norms and can therefore be considered of as a lesser degree
of mad. Mostly, the Fool seems amused by the events or at least takes them rather optimistically and
resorts to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Emphasised only by his outburst of what seems like pure madness, he stands as the character with
whom the audience is supposed to have the most sympathy with. However, these eruptions of
emotions that seem unintelligible can actually be deciphered. Therefore, the numerous soliloquies of
King Lear serve two purposes: They reveal King Lear as a person bordering on mad while also
containing linguistic constructions of intellect used by Shakespeare not only to play with language
but to make himself seem as a master of language. By managing to create sentences that can be read
as both the ramblings of a madman or the articulate ponderings of a rhetorical linguist, Shakespeare
proves the ambiguity that language possess whilst, of course, also underlining his own

Characterization in The Sailor Who Fell From Grace with...
Characterization in The Sailor Who Fell From Grace with the Sea and Wonderful Fool
The literary technique of characterization is often used to create and delineate a human character in
a work of literature. When forming a character, writers can use many different methods of
characterization. However, there is one method of characterization that speaks volumes about the
character and requires no more than a single word – the character's personal name. In many cases, a
personal name describes the character by associating him with a certain type of people or with a
well known historical figure. Therefore, since the reader learns the character's name first, a personal
name is a primary method of characterization; it ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This action of spying is typical of a 13 year old boy who is mad at his mother. Noboru knows that it
is wrong to spy on one's mother, but he decides to do it anyway and punish his mother in the
process. It is important to notice that "when his mother had been gentle to him, he [Noboru] was
able to sleep without looking" (Mishima 9). This unwillingness to use the peephole shows that
Noboru's spying is not driven by a sense of curiosity brought on by puberty; rather, it is driven by a
little boy's desire to punish his mother.
However, in order to examine the far reaching effects of Noboru's name upon his development as a
character, it is necessary to also examine Noboru's beliefs. By naming the character little boy,
Mishima has greatly influenced his thoughts and beliefs. Since his name tells the reader that Noboru
is a little boy, Noboru's thoughts and beliefs, following the meaning of his name, are based upon
childish beliefs and boyish logic. After he kills a defenseless kitten, Noboru thinks: "I killed it all by
myself ... I can do anything, no matter how awful" (Mishima 61). In addition, when it comes to his
group of friends, Noboru believes that :
All six of us are geniuses. And the world, as you know, is empty....As a matter of fact, we are the
ones who do the permitting. Teachers, schools, fathers, society – we

Insanity and the Necessity of Madness in King Lear Essay
The Necessity of Madness in King Lear
At the beginning of "King Lear," an authoritative and willful protagonist dominates his court,
making a fateful decision by rewarding his two treacherous daughters and banishing his faithful one
in an effort to preserve his own pride. However, it becomes evident during the course of the tragedy
that this protagonist, Lear, uses his power only as a means of projecting a persona, which he hides
behind as he struggles to maintain confidence in himself. This poses a problem, since the audience is
prevented from feeling sympathy for the king. Shakespeare's ironic solution is to allow Lear's
progressing madness to be paired with his recognition of truth, thereby forcing Lear to shed his
persona, and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In working so hard to project this persona, Lear is untrue to himself, and loses sight of who he is.
Even the scheming Goneril and Regan notice that their father "hath ever but/ slenderly known
himself." (I, i, 282–283) This makes Lear a very insecure person, which explains in part why he
insists that his daughters stroke his ego before receiving any of his kingdom. His identity crisis is
highlighted when he asks who can verify who he is, and the response by the Fool is: "Lear's
shadow." (I, iv, 251) At this point in the play, Lear is sane and is still the monarch of the kingdom.
Nevertheless, the Fool's insightful comment insists that Lear is nothing more than a shadow of his
true self. Plato would say that he is trapped in the shadow world of the cave, unable to grasp the true
forms.[5] This self–imposed persona estranges Lear from his audience; his vulnerability as a human
is masked by his rash behavior and unjust decisions. Bloom says that "before he goes mad, Lear's
consciousness is beyond ready understanding; his lack of self–knowledge, blended with his
awesome authority, makes him unknowable by us."[6] Without understanding a character, an
audience is most definitely unable to sympathize with him, and here we run into a potentially
problematic issue. Aristotle believes that

How Does Shakespeare 's King Lear And Alejandro Gonzalez...
How do Shakespeare's King Lear and Alejandro Gonzalez's Birdman use literary and film
techniques to explore the complex dynamics of power, social position, and age? Shakespeare and
Alejandro Gonzalez both successfully convey how an individual is treated due to their power, social
position, and age, in their respective texts King Lear and Birdman. Both portray the main character
as an individual who has lost their power and must overcome the challenges that come of this. These
characters also must endure society 's treatment of them due to their old age, especially from their
younger counterparts. The authors also exhibit how each individual is treated by society due to their
social position at the time. Both authors have the idea of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
She then goes on to say that he is not the only one fighting to be relevant and that he is "terrified,
like the rest of us, that he doesn't matter". This dialogue signifies something that the audience fears,
being forgotten by society, and further conveys this to them by exhibiting a character that this
affects. A motif of nakedness is also incorporated in the film. This occurs when Riggan is about to
perform a preview of his production. He gets locked out of the back of the theatre and must run
through the streets in only his underwear. It is this scene though that provides Riggan his chance to
become relevant, as he is filmed by a pedestrian and uploaded to YouTube. It is later that Sam refers
to this video as "power" for Riggan. This just shows what is classed as power in the twenty–first
century, and the audience can understand this when looking at celebrities and their dominance on
social media. This motif of nakedness is also present in Shakespeare's King Lear. In this story,
Shakespeare writes of a king who gives his power to his daughters only for them to overthrow him
completely and banish him from the kingdom. However, unlike in Birdman where the character
gains power, this motif occurs to symbolize Lear's complete loss of power. As without his lavish
clothes that reveal his regal status, he is no different to a farmer. The crown that Lear wore is also
symbolic of his power. As when Lear splits his kingdom up in two for his daughters to rule,

William Shakespeare 's King Lear
Lear 's endeavor gets revitalized with every generation that hears the saga, whether from myths,
fairy tales, or from King Lear itself. A timeless story, King Lear remains one of Shakespeare's
greatest tragedies for its universal themes involving communication, morality, and family. The fall
of characters in King Lear presents audiences with the frailty a community can exhibit from rulers'
pride. Stressing this message, Shakespeare mirrors the main plot surrounding Lear 's family with the
sub–plot of Gloucester and his sons. Through the use of dialogue exploring motivations for
character actions, King Lear amplifies the complexity of emotions in society. By sending Lear on a
journey into the hardships of a primitive life to test his mental stability, Shakespeare establishes how
madness can lead to clarity. Placing their affection in the wrong hands produces an onslaught of
tragic events for those in this play who bare their heartstrings. Shakespeare's King Lear dramatizes
how the use of language, the authenticity of civility, and various manifestations of love affect
relationships as well as psychological development.
Words within King Lear, whether read or heard, leave a lasting effect on the characters by triggering
the disintegration of their relationships. King Lear stresses how language can be used to victimize
people behind a veneer of legitimacy. Regan, Goneril, and Edmund in the opening scenes use their
eloquence as a tool to fulfill their agendas when the three

King Lear Character Analysis
KING LEAR A TRAGEDY OF PARENTS AND CHILDREN
In Shake spears King Lear, a tragedy between parents and children is evident. When the play opens,
Lear comes up with a test of love to justify giving Cordelia a large share of his kingdom. Morally,
the kingdom should be divided equally. Driven by his love for Cordelia, he decides to give her
largest share of his wealth. His two daughters Goneril and Regan deceive him by using sappy and
excessive declarations of their love for their father. Cordelia sincere and truthful cannot engage in
such a competition. She simply declares that she loves his father simply as a daughter should love
her father. Although truthful, her response angers the king who ends up disinheriting her completely.
A close friend of the king the Earl of Kent tries to talk on behalf of Cordelia, but the king is so
furious that he banishes him. Cordelia is later married by the king of France who admires her
honesty. She leaves for France and leave the king with his two cunning daughters. Although
banished, Kent knows the evil nature of the two daughters and remains in order to protect the king
from his two evil children. Through disguise he can take a job as King Lear's servant. The true
nature of Regan and Goneril are revealed once they realize that they are now in possession of all the
king's wealth. The king, a fool, and some knights in charge of the king's security soon leave to live
with Goneril. When Goneril reveals how he intends to treat his father, the

Twelfth Night Fool
Fools, ever since their inception these figures have been well known to be able to spread laughter
like a plague in the 14th century through 'blissful ignorance.' A fool, however, is not always a fool,
for in Shakespeare's Twelfth Night, the fool is the mastermind. Feste, the court jester, plays a pivotal
role in the play, so far as breaking the stereotype of the average buffoon and actually portraying a
man with a razor sharp wit, through his skillful word play, unsolicited yet wise advice, and good ole
humor.
By divulging the truth through clever jokes and humor, Feste manages to strike blows that
undermine his peers. He is able to freely express himself because he was appointed by Lady Olivia's
father before his passing, thus giving Feste

A Twelfth Night Comparrison of Characters Essay
Don't Judge A Book By It's Cover
Looks can be deceiving, and in the case of Sir Andrew and Feste the fool, the statement certainly
applies. Looking at the personalities of these two characters throughout Twelfth Night, no one will
see that each character is the exact opposite of each other. Their comparison is their contrast. The
first, Sir Andrew, is of "foolish wit", who looks that part he is supposed to play on the outside. He
looks sophisticated and very intelligent. Yet when actually speaking with this character, the opposite
applies and he really is just a fool. And Feste, the other character, looks the part of a fool and is used
for mere entertainment. Yet on the inside, he exhibits the mind of an ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Feste has many talents that do not go unnoticed. He may be considered the most intelligent person in
the whole cast of characters. Sir Andrew Aguecheek is a lover of life and a pure fool. He looks the
part of a noble man, and tries to play the part as well. Even his title, "Sir", refers to a knight. But
what is he really like? "He's as tall a man as any's in Illyria" (pp.14), according to Sir
Toby Belch. Toby is very mistaken though, since Andrew is no more than a foolish drunk.
The only thing that separates his personality from Sir Toby's is that he is a natural fool. In a scene,
Feste first says, "Beshrew me, knight's in admirable fooling:, and Andrew replies,
"Ay, he does well enough if he be disposed, and so do I, too. He does it with better grace, but I do it
more natural." (pp.58). Andrew himself is stating that he is a fool by nature.
Clearly he looks the part of a refined gentleman. He says he speaks another language but when
spoken to in that language, he doesn't understand it. And this shows to be more proof that Andrew is
a fool hidden behind a mask of a noble person.
A fine comparison was made between these two crucial characters. A fool who is smart, and a
nobleman who is a fool. Shakespeare really is brilliant, since he though up such an elaborate story
that says looks can be deceiving. And that statement sticks out plain as day. The next clown on the
street

William Shakespeare 's King Of The Good And Bad Of Human...
In William Shakespeare's play King Lear, similar to most of his pieces, he manages to build an
intricate storyline, weaving in and out of the good and bad of human nature. Shakespeare also
highlights the development of identity in results to hardship and utilizes characters, such as Lear the
protagonist to create emphasis. Lear, who is ridden with a naïve and un–insightful personality
plunges himself head first into an avoidable misfortune leads him to the loss of his kingship, his
relationship with his daughters and eventually his mind. However, through the endurance of these
adverse experiences and burdening inner conflict he gains a new perspective as well as a new–found
wisdom that transforms his identity for the better.
In Act I Scene I Lear's personality and surprising naivety is reflected through his choice of decisions
and actions towards the people who truly care about him. Lear instigates a gathering concerning the
division of his land and wishes to base it off of which daughter loves him most. Before his last and
youngest Daughter Cordelia professes her version of love for him Lear says "What can you say to
draw/ A third more opulent than your sisters? Speak."(1.1.81–85). This highlights Lear's
shallowness as he thrives off of compliments, flattery and sweet talk and equally depicts his lack of
wisdom because of the chosen method he deems as "fair division". However when Cordelia, apart
from her two evil sisters, expresses a truthful evaluation of her love

Examples Of Foolishness In Twelfth Night '
Human nature has a tendency to be rather foolish. The topic of foolishness is shown and developed
throughout Twelfth Night by William Shakespeare. Foolishness is developed using the actions of the
characters and through Feste's observations. This topic is important in this play because it exposes
how foolishness is part of human life. The characters in this play act foolish throughout the play.
Duke Orsino seems to be a strong and powerful man, he is known to be a noble man by the people
in Illyria "Who governs here? / A noble Duke, in nature as in name." (1.2.22) but in reality he is a
foolish, self–centered and superficial man. His superficial personality is shown when he shows that
he is desperate for Olivia, a woman he has never even

Theme Of Language In King Lear

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Christina Valadez

More from Christina Valadez (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Theme Of Language In King Lear