Report on Polish students' performance year 1

E R A S M U S + P R O J E C T
MULTIDISCIPLINARY FLIPPED
LEARNING WITH ICT
REPORT ON POLISH STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE
YEAR 1
prepared by Joanna Wilczyńska
from Publiczne Gimnazjum nr 30 im. Adama Mickiewicza w Łodzi, POLSKA
2015 – 2017
Turkey is the Main Coordinator of the Project
Participant Schools are Lithuania, Poland, Italy, Latvia, France, Portugal, Spain
KA2 - Cooperation for Innovation and the Exchange of Good Practices
Strategic Partnerships for Schools Only
Project Number: 2015-1-TR01-KA219-021988

2
KA2 - Cooperationfor Innovationandthe Exchange ofGoodPractices
Strategic Partnerships forSchools Only-EuropeanUnion Project
WebPage : http://flippedlearning.wix.com/home
e-Twinning: https://twinspace.etwinning.net/12713/home
Blog : http://flippedlearning2015.blogspot.com.tr
Face Page : www.facebook.com/FLwICT
Face Group : FLwICT 2015-2017(students) – ClosedGroup
MultidisciplinaryFlipped Learningwith ICT-FLwICT
The Project Call: 2015 - 2017
The Main Coordinator Country: Turkey
Participant Countries: Turkey-Lithuania-Latvia-Italy-Poland-Portugal-Spain-France
The goal of this evaluation is to obtain information about the
quality of the Polish students’ performance in terms of 4 key
competences in the frame of lifelong learning:
 Digital skills
 Cultural awareness and expression
 Communication in mother tongue
 Communication in foreign languages
The evaluation was made mostly for 33 Polish students who
constitute the project group. Some questions, though, were intended
for only 12 students who attended meetings in Italy, Spain and
Latvia during the 1st year of the FLwICT project.

3
SEPTEMBER 2015
PREPARATION OF THE
PROJECT BOARD

4
0 10 20 30 40
He/she ooperated with
other students
His/her motivation is high
He/she studied
consistently and
productively
He/she completed the
work on time
He/she did the work
selflessly
4
3
2
1
CONCLUSION:
Students agreed in 100% that cooperation with others is
not a problem to them. The work in the project gave them
satisfaction and they performed all the tasks according to
the deadline.

5
OCTOBER 2015
CREATING THE PROJECT LOGO

6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
He/she used the computer program for designing the
logo properly
He/she designed really creative logoHe/she did the work selflesslyHe/she cooperated with other studentsHis/her motivation is highHe/she studied consistently and productivelyHe/she completed the work on timeHe/she published the work on the e-twinning without
any problems
He/she published the work on face group
1
2
3
4

7
CONCLUSION:
Students recognized their work on the logo design as
creative and fully satisfying. 100% of all questions were
given the highest number of points defining the
cooperation with others, their motivation and the use of
time as perfect.

8
NOVEMBER 2015
PREPARING A DIGITAL POSTCARD

9
0 10 20 30 40
He/she used the logos of
Erasmus+ and NA correctly
He/she used the name of the
project
He/she defined the sources
He/she improved language
skills
He/she took care to use
proper English language
He/she researched enough
He/she cooperated with
other students
He/she studied consistently
and productively
He/she completed the work
on time
He/she published the work
on the e-twinning without…
on face group
4
3
2
1

10
CONCLUSION:
100% of students were rated highest in terms of their
cooperation with others, motivation to work and the use
the time. The survey also indicates that there were no
problems with publishing materials on educational
platforms. The execution of the tasks in time was done
productively.

11
JANUARY 2016
PREPARING A PRESENTATION
ABOUT CYBERBULLYING

12
0 1 2 3 4 5
He/she used the name of
the project
skills
other students
and productively
on time
on face group
4
3
2
1

13
CONCLUSION:
The survey was carried out for 4 students who represented
the school at the 2nd meeting in Italy: Jakub, Krzysztof,
Dawid and Patryk. All the questions were given the
highest number of points, thus assessing their work,
motivation, cooperation with others, and the use of time,
the use of computer technology and English, as very good.

14
FEBRUARY 2016
PREPARING A PRESENTATION
ABOUT CULTURE

15
0 1 2 3 4 5
Erasmus+ and NA…
the project
He/she defined the
sources
skills
He/she researched
enough
other students
He/she studied
consistently and…
He/she completed the
work on time
on the e-twinning…
on face group
4
3
2
1

16
CONCLUSION:
the school at the 3rd meeting in Spain: Aneta, Natalia, Paweł
and Filip. All the questions were given the highest number of
points, thus assessing their work, motivation, cooperation
with others, and the use of time, the use of computer
technology and English, as very good.

17
MARCH 2016
PREPARING AN E-GUIDE ABOUT
CULTURE

18
0 5 10 15
the project
skills
other students
and productively
on time
on face group
4
3
2
1

19
CONCLUSION:
The survey was carried out for all 12 students who
represented the school at all the meetings so far (in Italy,
Spain and Latvia). All the questions were given the
highest number of points, thus assessing their work,
motivation, cooperation with others, and the use of time,
the use of computer technology and English, as very good.

20
APRIL 2016
PREPARING A PRESENTATION ABOUT
CUSTOMS AND ETIQUETTE

21
0 1 2 3 4 5
He/she used the name of the
project
skills
other students
and productively
on time
on face group
4
3
2
1

22
CONCLUSION:
the school at the 4th meeting in Latvia: Magdalena,
Monika, Michał and Przemysław. All the questions were
given the highest number of points, thus assessing their
work, motivation, cooperation with others, and the use of
time, the use of computer technology and English, as very
good.

23
SEPTEMBER - MAY 2016
WORKING WITH PEN PALS

24
0 10 20 30 40
He/she registered on
Facebook group for
students
He/she registered on
eTwinning platform
He/she registered on any
other platform
He/she was active in
chats, e-mail exchange
and group work during…
His/her posts were
popular among peers
from abroad
other students
His/her impressions after
international meetings
were posted on platforms
1
2
3
4

25
CONCLUSION:
In the survey summarizing the work in one year of the project, it
is shown that 100% of the students did not have any
problems using educational platforms used in the project. It
is evident that the work on these platforms was interesting
for them.
So far more than half of them was collaborating actively with
others on Facebook. Others were passive. This is mainly due
to the fact that not all of them were involved in the foreign
visits so far. Hence, 39% of the students were rated in their
activity in chat rooms and e-mail exchange, as very poor. We
should pay more attention to that in the following year and
encourage students to more contacts and not only right before
an international exchange.
The same 39% of students were rated as poor in using their
English effectively. Only 50% of students’ actions were
considered attractive for colleagues from abroad. 28% were
considered to be very good. 35% of students in question were
not involved actively on Facebook and in exchanging e-mails
in the first year. This is due to the fact that they were not
among the students going abroad. They will improve their
performance next year.
Half of the students were assessed very good, meaning that they
had no problems with the publication of materials on various
platforms.

26

27

28

29
Evaluation prepared by
Dorota Zajączkowska, Agnieszka Pawlak and Joanna Wilczyńska
from
Publiczne Gimnazjum nr 30 im. Adama Mickiewicza w Łodzi, Polska
‘This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the
Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information
contained therein.’

30

Report on Polish students' performance year 1

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (12)

Similar to Report on Polish students' performance year 1

Similar to Report on Polish students' performance year 1 (20)

More from Joanna Dimitrova

More from Joanna Dimitrova (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Report on Polish students' performance year 1