The Law Of Contempt

The law of Contempt
"Many laws exist in Britain restraining the media. In 1992, the White Paper, Open Government,
identified 251 laws outlawing information disclosure. Two years later the Guild of Editors listed 46
directly relating to journalists. The laws of libel, contempt, defamation, obscenity and 'gagging'
injunctions to stop alleged breaches of confidence all act as restraints on the media." (Keeble,
Richard/ Ethics for Journalists)
The law of contempt can often be criticized by the media and has previously been branded as unfair
on the careers of many journalists. Article 10 gives anyone the right to freedom of expression, which
includes the right to hold opinions, and to receive and impart information without state interference.
This includes the right to communicate and to express oneself in any way, whether this be through
words, pictures, images or actions – including through public protest and demonstrations. The right
to freedom of expression could not be more crucial than in a democracy; information and ideas help
to inform the public and are essential in doing so. Having said this, contempt of court laws in
Scotland are in place to ensure that every person standing for trial has the right to a fair trial, and
will receive this.
Contempt law is now largely governed by the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The Act was passed as a
result of several UK defeats before the European Court of Human Rights and its aim was to make
the law clearer and more liberal. The Act was also designed in
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay On Presidential Pardon Power
The Presidential Pardon Power and its Limits The power to pardon is not the most discussed power
of the President of the United States. However, there have been some controversial cases that
sparked the debate about limiting this power. This paper deals with the origins of this constitutional
clause, its limits and interpretations by the Supreme Court of the United States. I would like to
mention some controversial cases and connected debate about limiting this power. Origins of the
Presidential Pardon The roots of the pardon can be traced far back in the history. There are
references to similar power in Mosaic Law, Greek Law and Roman Law. However, the U.S.
constitutional clause originated in the English law. The law was applied in the colonies and the
colonial governors held similarly broad pardon powers as the Kings. Except a simple pardon, they
could also grant conditional pardon to any offender. The original plans for the Constitution did not
contain a power of pardon. However, the main proponents of pardoning power Charles Pinckney,
Alexander Hamilton, and John Rutledge managed to push through the inclusion of this clause. After
a debate about this power during the Constitutional Convention, the presidential pardon clause was
added into the Constitution as one of the enumerated powers of the President of the United States. It
can be found in the Article II of the Constitution. It says: "The President ... shall have Power to grant
Reprieves and Pardons for

Income Withholding Orders Essay
Family law courts in West Virginia, and elsewhere, often issue child support orders for divorcing
couples, as well as those who were never married. The purpose of these orders is to ensure that both
parents bear the financial responsibilities of raising their child. The majority of parents follow
through with these court–ordered obligations. Sometimes, however, a parent may fall behind on his
or her payments.
There are any number of reasons why a parent may fall behind on his or her child support payments.
This includes the loss of a job, a change in earnings or a willful disregard of the order. Regardless of
the reason why a parent has fallen into arrears, there are a number of child support enforcement
options, which may be employed by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Through such orders, a parent's employer will withhold a portion of his or her earnings. Those
withholdings are then remitted to the state and applied towards their child support obligations.
If a parent is not working, the BCSE will often contact the parent by phone and send letters to
request payment. Should parents still not pay, the BCSE may ask to have them appear in a court
hearing to explain why they are not paying. As a result of such hearings, the court may order parents
to immediately find a job and start paying, award a judgment for the amount of unpaid support or
demand a lump sum payment for unpaid support.
License suspensions
Family law courts, as well as the BCSE, could take action against the driver's licenses of parents
who fail to pay their child support. Under West Virginia state law, this may be done if the amount a
parent owes is equal to, or greater than, the amount owed for six months. These orders are in effect
until the BCSE files a court order with the state's licensing authority that confirms parents have
complied with orders for payment of arrearages and current child support. In addition to a personal
driver's license, parents may also have their commercial driver's licenses, hunting and fishing
permits, and certain types of business licenses suspended or

The Effects Of Jurors ' Consulting The Internet And Social...
The 21st century is one of rapid technological change. The internet has become an increasingly
prevalent practice in many individuals' lives, with its persuasiveness spreading into the social realm.
Technologies such as mobile phones – combined with search engines, blogs and social media,
namely Twitter and Facebook –have become widespread. The effect of these types of technologies
has become apparent in the courtroom and poses many new litigation challenges, ultimately
impeding the administration of justice. This essay will be examining the effects of jurors' consulting
the internet and social media, assessing the current law and procedure on juror misconduct and
highlighting the possible solutions to overcome this issue.
In order to assess whether jurors should be allowed to consult the internet and social media, there
are a number of considerations to be made. Firstly, it is essential to understand the external
influences, which may be imposed upon the jury. Looking for information on–line and using search
engines such as "Google" have become a habitual practice in the modern world. Jurors may be
tempted to carry out their own research into the case to expand their knowledge, ensuring they are
making the correct decision. Studies have shown that conducting internet research allows a juror to
find out media accounts of the case, physical or other factual evidence, expert opinions, personal
information on the parties involved including their criminal history, and the

The Importance Of Hate Speech
In scenario number one, the main controversy up for debate is the topic of hate speech and whether
it is protected under the First Amendment. Additionally, another question to address is whether
individuals who may espouse hate speech are protected by the First Amendment to peacefully
assemble in the public sphere. Prior to addressing these issues, it is important to understand the case
law surrounding hate speech and the government's capacity to regulate speech. One method is prior
restraint, which specifies that the "government may prosecute individuals who violate legitimate
restrictions on expression but, absent extraordinary circumstances, may not intervene before the
fact". There are many classes of speech, and some are protected more than others. The most
protected classification is political speech, because it is presumed to be the most consistent with the
framers intentions, and therefore requires the Court to apply strict scrutiny in censorship cases. To
pass the test of strict scrutiny the government must prove that its regulation serves a compelling
government interest. Therefore in order to censor political speech, the government must prove that it
will cause irreparable harm to the safety of the country and/or the citizens. Furthermore, if the
speech is occurring in a public forum, such as a street, sidewalk, or park, the Court must apply strict
scrutiny as well. Abrams v. United States was one of the first and more consequential cases on the
protections

Circuit Court Case Analysis
On June 28, 2013, appellee, Jennifer Brandeen, ("Mother"), was awarded an absolute divorce from
appellant, David Brandeen, ("Father") in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. The circuit
court amended its judgment on November 6, 2013. Mother later appealed the circuit court's decision
to this court, where we affirmed the circuit court's judgment except on a question relating to the
court's marital property award. Father, sought––and was granted––an en banc review of the circuit
court's judgment. After the en banc review, the circuit court's judgment was affirmed. Beginning on
February 24, 2014, and extending through March of 2015, the parties filed a litany of motions to
either enforce or modify the circuit court's judgment in the divorce decree. Namely, Father filed a
Petition for Modification of Custody and Additional Relief, an Expedited Motion for Reduction in ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On August 14, 2015, the final day of the hearing, the court denied Father's motion to modify
custody, except with respect to an order regarding the exchange of the minor children. The court
denied Father's motion to modify his child–support obligation. Further, the court found husband in
contempt for failure to pay child–support. Additionally, the court found Wife in contempt for a
missed visitation following the en banc hearing in September of 2014. Finally, the court awarded
Mother $20,000 in attorney's fees. On appeal, Father challenges the circuit court's decision on his
motion to modify custody, the circuit court's denial of his motion to modify child–support, the
circuit court's decisions finding him in contempt and failing to hold Mother in contempt, and the
grant court's grant of attorney's fees to Mother. Specifically, Father presents four questions for our
review, which we rephrase as follows:
1. Whether the circuit court erred in modifying its child–custody

The Pros And Cons Of Committal For Civil Contemnors
An Injunction; An injunction is an order of the court that directs a person to do something or to
refrain from doing something / eg. Trespassing wherein a trespasser does not have the assets to meet
a damages award. It will prevent some future actions (quiatimet) Committal for contempt is
primarily coercive its object being to ensure that Court orders are complied with. However in cases
of serious misconduct the Court has jurisdiction to punish the contemnor. An injunction in this case
will prevent the protestors from obstructing the workers. When exercising its powers for coercive
purposes the jurisdiction to imprison for an indefinite period for civil contempt is one to be
exercised sparingly. If there is any other means whereby compliance ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
If the protestors continue to engage in their destructive behaviour they are many consequences that
may occur. Any one of the following consequences may be enforced on the protestors depending on
the extent of their destructive actions. The protestors may have to pay a fine which is already set out
in the Statute, the fine is revised every now and again. Failure to pay this fine after a certain period
of time can lead to a more serious consequence such as imprisonment. On spot fines can also be a
consequence and no prosecution will occur if they are paid. Imprisonment can be a consequence, a
sentence can be implied by the court but the actual length of the sentence is chosen by the
government. A sentence will tend to be a short one in cases like this, long sentences will only be
enforced when a very serious offence has been committed. The minister for justice can remit
sentences and give prisoners temporary release if they have been on good

Freedom Of Expression Contained Within The European...
An essential role of a journalist is to act as a 'public watchdog' and the media enjoys freedoms and
protection in pursuit of this objective. Court reporting is fundamental to the principle of open justice
that 'not only must justice be done; it must also be seen to be done.' This common aim of media and
the courts is met with some restrictions, of which contempt of court is most serious. For journalists,
contempt can generally arise where an article prejudices a person's right to a fair trial. It is mostly
covered by the Contempt of Court Act 1981, hereafter referred to as 'The Act', which was brought in
to force in an attempt to strike a fair balance between the Article 6 right to a fair trial and Article 10
freedom of expression contained within the European Convention of Human Rights. It encourages
responsible reporting while discouraging outside interference with justice. Scottish courts are
viewed as comparatively harsh on contempt, but it is important for them to remain realistic. It is rare
that a trial will be deserted on the basis of contempt of court, as courts are disinclined to allow
appalling crimes to go unpunished due to inevitable publicity regarding them. In Cox & Griffiths,
Petitioners Lord Prosser stated that 'juries are healthy bodies. They do not need a germ–free
atmosphere'. Contempt of court comes in numerous forms such as disobedience of a court order,
unauthorised recording of court proceedings or 'murmuring judges'. Where journalists

Australian Public Service And Code Of Conduct
Learning Problem 1 (620 Words)
Free speech is commonly assumed to be speech unrestricted by regulation, nevertheless legislators
may also enact legislation to protect the implicit right to free speech. This is presented in the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights article 19 section 1, stating 'everyone shall have
the right to hold opinions without interference.' This may be distinguished in this case as the
employee has entered both into an employment contract with an implied social media agreement,
and Commonwealth and State laws which are permitted to transcend this material. This implicit and
explicit notion of free speech transcends into the spectrum of social media, an instrument pertaining
a multitude of advantageous ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The objective of an open court is the right of public of admission for the public. This principle of
open justice is reflected in the aforementioned article 14(1) of the ICCPR. This factor of open justice
fashions a circumstance in which the media has no greater common law right to attend court than
any other member of the public. It may be noted that special privileges exists for journalist; seating,
note–taking and some access to documents. Access to documents is restricted due to the
aforementioned equality of journalists and general public, coinciding with the court not being a
public register with rights to access. The notion of open justice allows our journalists to enter and
report on cases, such as the 'Moreton Bay Killer'. Open justice is the key to accurate and
knowledgeable reporting in the public best interest. Nevertheless, situations exist in which an open
court may not be available, or even

Court Case Of Miami-Dade Water V. Metro
B. A final order is reached as to a particular party when there is nothing left for the court to do to
resolve the substantive controversy as to that party.
This Court has previously held that "[i]n determining the finality of an order, judgment, or decree,
the test employed by the appellate court is whether the order appealed constitutes an end to the
judicial labor in the trial court, and nothing further remains to be done to terminate the dispute
between the parties directly affected." Miami–Dade Water & Sewer Auth. v. Metro. Dade Cty., 469
So. 2d 813, 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); see also Almacenes El Globo De Quito, S.A. v. Dalbeta L.C.,
181 So. 3d 559, 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (stating that for the purposes of appellate review, an order
of the circuit court is final if it ends all judicial labor in the case.) ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, this is a final order and it was proper for the father to file his Notice of Appeal within 30
days from March, 16, 2016. The father entered the Notice of Appeal on March 26, 2016, ten (10)
days after. Consequently, this Court has jurisdiction to heard this case, which was filed in a timely
manner.
II. THE THE APPELLANT'S STATEMENT OF THE CASE, STATEMENT OF FACTS, AND
ARGUMENTS NUMBERED IV–VI ARE BACKED BY EVIDENCE CONTAINED ON THE
RECORD. EVEN SOME OF THIS EVIDENCE WERE PROVIDED BY OPPOSING

The Case With The Non Custodial Parent ( Ncp )
Lee County DHR's testimony revealed that the case with the non–custodial parent (NCP), Mr.
Harley, begin back in 1992 when the custodial parent(CP), Wanda Marshall, applied for services to
establish a paternity order, income withholding (IWO), and medical. An order was establish and the
NCP was paying. On July 9, 2008, the CP requested enforcement; DHR took legal action and filed
contempt against the NCP because he had not made a payment since April 2008. The NCP appeared
in court and paid $400.00; the court dismissed the review because an IWO had been mailed and
payments was been received through the IWO. On November 5, 2010, a contempt action was filed
again, due to the NCP not paying since August 2010. On January 5, 2011, the NCP ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The NCP has been mailing his payments to the payment center and the payments have been posting;
DHR has been receiving $191.92 each month, which is being disbursed to the CP.
Russell County DHR representative's testimony revealed that on July 14, 2003, the case with the CP,
Juanita James, and the NCP was established. The NCP was ordered to pay child support of $190.10
per month. At the time the case opened, the parties were married, and the NCP was ordered to pay
the amount of child support as stated in the divorce decree. The court incorporated and adopted the
child support order into the divorce decree order. The NPC was already paying child support on
those cases. In 2007, the CP applied for services, the case opened and was referred to the District
Attorney's office. Once the case was referred, the arrears were set on the case at the time of
enforcement. The CP stated there were no direct payments received. All payments that were
received through the payment center were calculated and received along with entering the Affidavit
of No Direct Payments. The representative stated based on those facts, the interest was calculated on
the child support amount in the order. The NCP was ordered to pay $190.10 per month beginning
June 20, 2003 and an additional $25.00 per month toward retro support; the current arrears owed are
$24,635.30. In April

Who Is Giles Corey In The Crucible
In the Crucible there is someone in the town of Salem who was asked to implicate the people
involved in a crime. That man is Giles Corey, who had stated that a man told him that Thomas
Putnam told his daughter, Ruth, to blame the neighbors for witchcraft. The reason behind this action
that Putnam took was to gain more land. When he approached the court Dansforth immediately took
interest however, he also wanted to know that name of the witness. Corey knew that the witness
would be arrested and would be jailed. So he would not budge he kept on refusing to give the name
even after the threats made to him. Eventually, Corey was arrested for contempt in court all because
he would not give the name of the witness. In conclusion, Giles Corey was

Questions On The Criminal Justice System
INTRODUCTION
1. In this paper I am going to consider the particular challenges that the internet, and its associated
'thundering tyde' of information, misinformation, and comment available to anyone with access to a
computer, has posed to the administration of justice.
2. The criminal justice system has traditionally sought to protect jurors from exposure to prejudicial
material, and the law of contempt has played a key part in this endeavour. The law places
restrictions on the publication of potentially prejudicial material through the strict liability rule. And,
addressing the problem from the other end, judicial directions are routinely given to juries, and these
are designed to limit the risk of them being exposed to such material.
3. The current law of contempt was developed in an age which had not anticipated the information
and communication revolution that we are now living through. Material that is prejudicial to
criminal proceedings may now be disseminated with extraordinary speed and to a potentially
unlimited audience; indeed such material may have been reposing on the internet long before even
the crime leading to those proceedings has been committed, but remains accessible to anyone caring
to look for it.
4. Many have been bowled over by this gathering torrent of words. The columnist Matthew Parris,
considering his position on the board of free speech organisation Index on Censorship, recently
wrote in The Spectator:
"... we gave a considered submission

Definition Of Contempt Of Court
Introduction Contempt of Court can be defined as any act which derogates the dignity and authority
of Courts amounts to contempt. It can alternatively defined as 'any act done or writing published
calculated to bring a Court or a judge of the Court into contempt , or to lower his authority is a
contempt of Court. Further, any act done or writing published calculated to obstruct or interfere with
due course of justice or the lawful processes of the court is a Contempt of Court. ' "Contempt of
Court" is a generic term descriptive of conduct in relation to particular proceedings in a court of law
which tends to undermine that system or to inhibit citizens from availing themselves of it for the
settlement of their disputes. Contempt of Court thus may take many forms. But most commonly
categorized types are Civil Contempt and Criminal Contempt. There are various laws and provisions
in India governing Contempt of Courts cases. Their positions as under various subheads are: 1.
Constitution of India In the Indian Constitution Article 129 declares Supreme Court to be a court of
record and entrusts it with the power to punish for contempt of itself. Article 215 of Indian
Constitution entrusts High Courts with such powers to punish for its contempt. There are provisions
regarding power of higher judiciary to punish subordinate courts and judicial authorities for its
contempt. Article 141 of Indian Constitution declares that laws declared by Supreme Court shall be
binding on all

Circuit Court Case Study
In this instant appeal, Mr. Shoemaker asserts that the circuit court erred by imposing an improper
purge provision after finding him to be in contempt, and that the circuit court erred in finding that
Mr. Shoemaker would be liable for alimony payments in accordance with the parties' original
separation agreement. We shall address both of these arguments in turn.
I. The Circuit Court Did Not Craft an Improper Purge Provision in Its Contempt Order. The scope of
our review of a trial court's contempt finding is as follows:
(a) Scope of review. –Any person may appeal from any order or judgment passed to preserve the
power or vindicate the dignity of the court and adjudge him in contempt of court, including an
interlocutory order, remedial in nature, adjudging any person in contempt, whether or not a party to
the action.
Md. Code (2006, 2013 Repl. Vol., 2015 Suppl.) § 12–304(a) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings
Article ("CJP"). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Dept. of Human Res.], 402 Md. [79,] 101, 935 A.2d 432 [(2007)] (citing Jones, [supra,] 351 Md. at
282, 718 A.2d 222). Any purge must be within the present ability of the defendant to perform at the
time of sentencing. Arrington, [supra,] 402 Md. at 101, 935 A.2d 432; Bryant [v. Howard Cnty.
Dept. of Soc. Serv. Ex rel. Costley], 387 Md. [30,] 48, 874 A.2d 457 [(2005)]; Jones, [supra,] 351
Md. at 275, 718 A.2d 222. The reason for the rule lies in the coercive, as opposed to punitive, nature
of sanctions in a civil contempt proceeding. Jones, [supra,] 351 Md. at 281, 718 A.2d 222 ("If a
defendant is unable to pay a purge provision, no amount of time in prison will induce compliance.").
Therefore, if the sanction is incarceration and the purge is the payment of

The Law Of Contempt Of Court
Contempt of court is 'any words spoken or written, or any conduct which might impede the working
of the court, or which could create a disregard of the authority of our justice system.' (Samson,
2014). The two most common types of contempt of court are sub judice rule and the failure to obey
a court order. Most of the law of contempt in New Zealand is common law, however, parts of it that
deal with the conduct in court and specific offenses that relate to the administration such as perjury,
are considered as statutes.
Sub judice rule is designed to avoid unfair prejudice to the parties to prevent trial by news media,
and to preserve the judicial authority of the courts. It is this rule which had created the most
controversy over whether it is high time that the contempt of court is reformed to fit the 'Internet
Age' we live in today. The outdated language and concepts only reiterates that the law was
developed prior to the 'Internet Age' and the enactment of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990
(s 25).
Smith and Dean state that 'publication contempt includes any publications that interfere with the
conduct of particular legal proceedings and publications that undermine the judiciary through
scurrilous abuse, or by allegations of bias and partiality' (2011). 'Scandalising the court' is a
contempt issue that addresses and describes publications that tend to undermine the judicial system
(NZLC IP36). In this essay, both 'publication contempt' and 'scandalising the court'

The Issue Of Offshore Jurisdictions
Introduction
At first glance, the legislation in offshore jurisdictions makes the repatriation of assets seemingly
impossible, providing the impossibility defence for debtors unwilling to relinquish assets owed to
creditors. Offshore jurisdictions may use clever tactics such as duress and flight clauses to make
repatriation of the assets in protection trusts difficult, but onshore jurisdictions are not to be fooled;
the court will either declare the trust a sham, void the transaction, threaten professional negligence
against the attorney or hold the settlor in contempt until compliance. As long as the debtor is
physically residing in the onshore jurisdiction and subject to the laws of that nation, the court can
effectively through coercive means attempt to repatriate the assets from the trust.
Sham Trusts
In Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd [1967] 2 QB 786, 802, Lord Diplock defined
sham as, 'acts done or documents executed by the parties to the "sham" which are intended by them
to give to third parties or to the court the appearance of creating between the parties legal rights and
obligations different from the actual legal rights and obligations (if any) which the parties intend to
create. But one thing, I think, is clear in legal principle, morality and the authorities ... that for acts
or documents to be a "sham" with whatever legal consequences follow from this, all the parties
thereto must have a common intention that the acts or documents are not

Case Court Bar Association V. Union Of India Essay
In this case court cancels the license of advocate from practising legal profession in exercising the
contempt jurisdiction by the Supreme Court or High Court. Though this case was repealed in
Supreme Court Bar Association V. Union of India, AIR 199 SC 1895. The facts are as Bansal
Forgings Ltd took loan from the UP Financial Corporation and it made default in payment of
instalment of the same. The Corporation proceeded against the Company under Sec 29 of the UP
Financial Corporation Act. The Company filed a civil suit against the corporation and it had also
filed an application for grant of temporary injunction. Counsel for the corporation suo motu put
appearance in the matter before trial court and prayed for time for filing of reply. The learned trial
Court passed an order on the said date and this order was as follows: "The corporation will not seize
the factory of the Company. The Company shall pay the amount of instalments and will furnish also
security for disputed amount." The Trial Court directed to furnish security on 31/01/94 and the case
was fixed on 15/03/94. Against the said order of the trial Court the appeal was filed in the High
Court and the argument was advanced that the Court had no jurisdiction to pass the order for
payment of instalment of loan and no security could have ordered. During the argument the event
leading to contempt happened. Justice S.K. Keshote against whom the contempt was committed
wrote a letter to the Acting Chief Justice of

The Controversy Of The Confederate Flag Essay
Thompson 1
Flag Desecration
Matthew Thompson
Ponce de Leon High School
College Prep English
Terri Carroll
December 18, 2016
Thompson 1
Outline: Flag Desecration
Thesis: The controversy of the showing of the confederate flag is something huge. I. Flag
Background A. Desecration Labeled Misdemeanor B. Illegal Specifics C. Permit Burning II. State
Codes A. Individual State Laws B. Elements of the Flag C. Supreme Court Validation III. Bylaw for
Flags A. Broke Down Specifications B. Detailed Rules
Thompson 2
The controversy of the showing of the confederate flag is something huge. You have the bunch that
does not like the flag, and then there is the group of individuals the support and fly the flag with
pride. There are five states that have laws, in their own state, that state it is illegal to burn or deface
the confederate flag. On surface, these state laws would seem to conflict the 5–4 decision made by
the Supreme Court in Texas v. Johnson. The controversial case in 1989 that held up the burning the
flag as an act of protected free speech. (As it is stated under the First Amendment.)
?If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not
prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or
disagreeable,? said Justice William Brennen in his majority opinion. ?We have not recognized an
exception to this

Malloy V. Mallay Case Study
William Malloy was arrested during a gambling raid in 1959 by Hartford police. Malloy pleaded
guilty to the crime of pool selling, a misdemeanor, and was sentenced to one year in jail and a 500$
dollar fine. About sixteen months after Mallory was petition to testify before a magistrate appointed
by the Superior Court of Hartford County to conduct an inquiry into alleged gambling and other
criminal activities in the county. Malloy was asked numerous of question related to events
surrounding his arrest and conviction. Malloy refused to answer any questions stated " on the
grounds it may tend to incriminate me". The Superior Court held Malloy in contempt, and
committed to prison until was willing to answer the questions. As a result, Malloy applied

Roles Of A Jury Essay
What is a Jury and Role of Jury A jury based trials are present most of the time in criminal cases and
also civil cases but in civil cases it's only used 1% of the time. The jury system is an important part
of the Magna Carta [1215]. In a civil case there are 8 jurors present and in a criminal case the jury
system consists of 12 people that are randomly selected by an electoral system but will be vetted to
see if they are eligible to be part of the jury. The jury system has been part of the English Legal
system for the past 800 years. Jurors used to research the case beforehand before the reign of king
Henry 2. The modern day jury system makesure the jurors have little to no knowledge before
hearing the case so that they can make a non ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The courts did this so that the verdicts formed by the jury was based on fair trial and innocent
people would not get convicted guilty by the jury based on gossip formed by the public. In the past,
it was easier for the courts to shield jurors from gossip or what not. However, in the modern age it is
much more difficult due to the presence of the Internet . In the past, searching for information
outside of the courtroom was a lengthy and difficult task so it was easy for the courts to deter the
jurors from searching for information. In modern times information over the case could be found
through newspaper articles and online stories by a snap of a finger. The courts have warned jurors
time and time again not to research the case because they could be charged with offence or contempt
but it still happens time and time again. The case that shows how outside material could cause a trial
to not be fair is R v Marshall and Crump (2007), two defendants that were charged with offences
that included robbery and manslaughter claimed they didn't have a fair trial because after their
convictions, material off the Internet was found in the jury room that was a contempt of court and it
was not fair because their convictions might have been bias to media speculation resulting to a
wrongful

Separation V. Shoemaker's Obligation
Mr. Shoemaker further contends that the circuit court erred when it found that Mr. Shoemaker's
default: has resurrected Plaintiff's alimony obligation per the parties'[] original Separation
Agreement, which was incorporated but not merged into the July 23, 2013 Judgment of Absolute
Divorce, and Plaintiff's alimony obligation shall therefore re–commence on June 1, 2015 for the
balance of the alimony term per Section 7 of the August 29, 2012 Separation Agreement.Pursuant to
Md. Rule 15–207(e)(4), when a court makes a finding of constructive civil contempt, the court must
issue an order articulating the amount of arrearage, any sanction imposed for the contempt, and a
means for the condemner to purge the contempt. Notably, these three elements must necessarily be
included in an order of a contempt, but the text of the Maryland Rule does not limit a contempt
order exclusively to these elements. In the present action, the trial judge found Mr. Shoemaker in
default of his obligation in the amount of $52,000.00. This finding satisfies the trial judge's
obligation under Md. Rule 15–207(e)(4)(A). The trial judge, however, continued to render an
opinion of the legal relationship of the parties going forward under the consent order. Mr.
Shoemaker asserts that the trial judge's interpretation of the consent order going forward was
erroneous ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Shoemaker's freedom on his continued performance under the consent order. Rather, the court's
interpretation of the parties' obligations under the consent order was merely an utterance that was
superfluous to the question before it. Indeed, all Mr. Shoemaker needs to do in order to purge
himself of the contempt is to tender $12,000.00. Accordingly, the portion of the order purporting to
interpret Mr. Shoemaker's obligation going forward did not constitute an improper purge provision
under Md. Rule

Child Support Research Paper
How do you Enforce a Child Support Order in Texas? Have you considered hiring a child support
attorney? It's easy and cost–effective to hire an enforcement attorney for your child support needs.
You have a court order including provisions establishing child support, however, the parent required
to pay child support has fallen behind on payments or has stopped paying altogether. You may need
to go back to court for help enforcing the child support order. Remedies In Texas, if you the obligee
(person entitled to receive child support payments) are owed child support you can ask the court to
help you collect the past–due support. The court can order several remedies against the obligor
(person ordered to pay child support) to help you collect ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The documents will be served on the obligor by either a private process server or constable. Hearing
The summons will state when the hearing will be held. It is at this hearing that obligee will have the
opportunity to prove whether the obligor failed to follow the court order. A judge will have several
choices in a motion for enforcement case. Oftentimes, the judge may fine and/or jail the delinquent
parent for contempt of court. The judge may even require that the delinquent parent pays a portion
of the outstanding amount prior to being released from jail. Final Closing A party can file a motion
for enforcement without an attorney however, it is not recommended if you do not have experience
filing and representing yourself in motion fro enforcement. If you fail to present, the enforcement in
the correct manner then you risk having your case dismissed. How can a Child Support Attorneys
with the Brandy Austin Law Firm Help You? If you or your child's parent is behind on child support,
call the Brandy Austin Law Firm and let us fight for your rights. We can help you through the entire
process. Call today for a free consultation at (817

Lee County DHR Case Summary
Lee County DHR's testimony revealed that the case with the non–custodial parent (NCP), Felton
Harley, Jr., begin back in 1992 when the custodial parent(CP), Wanda Marshall, applied for services
to establish a paternity order, income withholding (IWO), and medical. An order was established
and the NCP was paying child support. On July 9, 2008, the CP requested enforcement; DHR filed
contempt against the NCP because he had not paid a child support payment since April 2008. The
NCP appeared in court and paid $400.00; the court dismissed the review because an IWO had been
mailed and the payments were being received through the IWO. On November 5, 2010, a contempt
action was filed again, due to the NCP not paying child support since August 2010. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
On October 22, 2014, the FIDM lien was requested in accordance with the Code of Alabama 1975
30–3, 30–3–197 and 30–3–198. On October 23, 2014, the Secretary of State acknowledged the lien
and the levy was requested. On the same day, the Notice of Levy was sent to the financial
institution. On October 27, 2014, the levy package was generated for the NCP. On December 9,
2014, the Lien Unit received a notice from the Navy Federal Credit Union that account numbers
3019677362, 3044625709, 7034239553, and 3044624900; the accounts have zero funds for
payment. The levy was released; it was re–added due to the account on the FIDM screen; not listed
on notice having funds. On that same day, the FIDM levy was released on the account #530116705.
Again, on that day, the FIDM levy was requested and the notice was sent to the financial institution.
On December 11, 2014, the FIDM Levy package was produced. On February 25, 2015, the NCP
contacted the Lien Unit and stated that he had sent a statement of benefits letter from social security
about two weeks ago. The Lien Unit told him that they had not received the information and
requested the NCP to send the information and the Request for a Review Form via fax to expedite
the process. On March 20, 2015, the Lien Unit contacted the NCP; he stated he mailed the statement
from social security about a month ago and wanted confirmation that it was received. The NCP was
advised that no documents had been received. Again, the Lien Unit requested the NCP to fax in the
documents. On March 25, 2015, through contact of voice mail, the Lien Unit requested the NCP's
last three months bank statements on the account affected by the lien or where the social security
benefits are deposited. Later that day, the Lien Unit informed the NCP that the Social Security
Administration

Sub-Judice Corrupt Research Paper
Sub judice contempt, theoretically, is a noble, necessary law, designed to protect citizens' intrinsic
democratic right to a fair, unprejudiced trial. Nevertheless, the ambiguity and erratic applications of
this law have broader detrimental effects. This is because the law, by definition, conflicts with
another fundamental democratic principle: freedom of speech. Balancing these core ideals, while
pleasing stakeholders and operating ethically and legally, is difficult, leading to divergent rulings,
and thereby causing uncertainty for journalists and professional communicators about what can be
published. This essay will address this anomaly, arguing that sub judice rulings in Australia must
strive for greater clarity and consistency, as current ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Robinson (2001, p.261), clarifies that, "in cases where the public interest in the administration of
justice conflicts with the public interest in freedom of speech, Australian courts have traditionally
favoured the former." However, rulings such as these risk journalists' not publishing legally
legitimate information, as they are unsure if it will be viewed as contempt, and are unwilling to take
the risk, thus inadvertently, and unjustifiably, impinging upon free speech (Bowley 2005) (Aniano
2005). This is a significant and contentious point, highlighting the conundrum. Bowley (2006, p.15),
illustrates this, discussing the balance between free speech and an unprejudiced trial, "Striking a
balance between these two interests is a difficult task, which in Australia, has been addressed by the
common law over time. While a number of decisions have considered how the balance should be
maintained, no authoritative guidance has yet been developed in Australia, with considerable
uncertainty still surrounding the questions of when a publication will offend the sub judice rule."
Bowley (2006, p.15) expands, believing that elucidation of sub judice contempt would benefit all
major stakeholders, and ultimately "avoid costly and time–consuming litigation, and at the same
time, allow the media to publish and broadcast with greater confidence and without fear of being
found to be in contempt of court." Lorne and Valerie (2013, p.537), strongly emphasise this point,
believing, "not only that we lack a clear understanding of this [sub judice] rule, but also that because
of this, it is used selectively, incoherently, and instrumentally. As a result, the accountability of
government, the integrity of adjudicative processes, and the effectiveness of the media all may be
jeopardised." Clearly, balancing free speech and the right to a fair trial is a difficult

Law
Contempt is generally defined as an act of disobedience to an order of a court, or an act of disrespect
of a court. A client's failure to comply with a restraining order, a visitation order or an injunction in
any kind of action may result in a finding of contempt of court, no matter the intention.
The court has the power to punish neglection, violation of duty, or any other misconduct. Also a
non–payment of a sum of money, ordered by the court to be paid can lead to contempt of court.
Another type of contempt is whether the contempt charged is civil or criminal in nature. The
difference between civil and criminal contempt is the remedy sought. If the purpose of the contempt
order is remedial, such as to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Assuming contempt of court is shown, it is punishable with many criminal penalties, such as
imprisonment or fines. A fine is readily imposed on either an individual person or a trade union .
Contempt of court concerning journalistic matters was dealt by the common law until 1981.
Newspapers were almost always held for contempt of court because of what they wrote. The
decisions were quite strict due to the fact that they were made by judges. After the Contempt of
Court Act of 1981, matters concerning contempt of court were dealt by acts of Parliament. With this
act a person can be found liable for contempt of court in two cases:
1) When a publication made by an individual had caused prejudice or impediment to particular
proceedings
2) Proceedings are active.
The court can punish journalists with contempt of court in many ways. One way is for him to show a
document, image, video or audio material to the public, which might interfere with the courts'
decision at a trial. Another way in which a journalist can be sentenced to contempt of court is when
he / she publicises material and information that only the court has the right to know like the
decision taken by the jury in the jury room. A journalist can be held in contempt of court in general
if he is interfering with justice.
In order to have a proper trial, judges will have to bear in mind that

How Law Can Be Termed As A Social Phenomenon Essay
Law can be termed as a social phenomenon. It is a social function, an expression of human society
concerning the external relations of its individual members. Law depends on its acceptance by the
society; in fact, it is made through the "general will" of the society. Society can never be static; it
remains dynamic through economic, scientific and technological developments. Therefore, the Law
must evolve and adapt to the changing requirements of the society. Sir David Maxwell Fyte
observed: The law is not to be compared to a venerable antique to be taken down, dusted, admired
and put back on the shelf; rather it is like an old, but still vigorous tree–family rooted in the history
but still putting out new shoots taking new grafts and from time to time dropping dead wood. That
process has been going on, is going on now and will continue. The two most essential functions of
the State are War and Administration of Justice among others. Administration of Justice implies the
maintenance of peace and order within the political society of the State. Today, a civilised society
lives at a stage where pubic justice prevails rather than private justice. (Create link between
administration of justice and rule of law) Rule of Law......... Object of the Law of Contempt Under
"the Statement of Objects and Reasons" of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, it has been 'made clear
that the law relating to contempt of courts is uncertain, undefined and unsatisfactory in the country.
While

Analysis Of The Attorney Consumer Assistance Program Essay
On September 28, 2015, Elizabeth Knowles contacted the Attorney Consumer Assistance Program
regarding Allan L. Knowles, Esq. Elizabeth's complaint was forwarded to Assistant Bar Counsel
Stacey Best on October 21, 2015, after Allan Knowles was found in contempt in relation to an
ongoing divorce probate matter. Allan Knowles was sentenced to 45 days in Barnstable County
House of Corrections, or until a contempt payment of $10,000 was paid. FACTS On July 10, 1997, a
Judgment of Divorce Nisi was granted to Allan and Elizabeth Knowles, due to an irretrievable
breakdown of the marriage. Elizabeth later filed a Complaint for Contempt on June 6, 2014, due to
Allan's failure to pay child support (arrearage $65,000), health insurance premiums ($137,000) for
their son, college expenses ($90,000), and medical bills ($12,750). After several delays a hearing
regarding the Complaint for Contempt occurred on October 5, 2015; Judge Sabaitis determined that
Allan was in contempt and had the ability to pay the child support arrearage as well as the cost of
the other expenses. Sabaitis ordered that Allan pay $1,000 a month (applied against the arrearage),
$7,500 in attorney fees, and a $70 for service of process. In addition to paying the costs, Sabaitis
also ordered that Allan be committed to jail for 45 days, or until "he shall purge himself of said
contempt by payment of $10,000." Allan was taken into custody on October 5, 2015, and Elizabeth
believes his family posted the $10,000 on

Justice, Public Interest And Open Justice
Contempt of court implies to the courts ' ability to punish individuals that might interfere with the
course of justice and the court system. Criminal proceedings are acknowledged as being active
through the 1981 act when an individual has been arrested without warrant; the grant of a warrant
for arrest; the grant of a warrant to cite; or service of an indictment or other document specifying the
charge. A Criminal proceeding will cease to be active when a verdict, sentence has been reached.
Inference with the court system can take many forms, therefore there are grave contempt's which
could result in imprisonment of the editor or journalist. The essence of contempt ensures that an
individual gets a fair trial; a part of the of the Human ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There two forms of contempt of court; Common law which focuses on actions which might interfere
with the course of justice. Strict liability, which forbids any material which could create a substantial
risk against the course of justice that, would cause serious impeded or prejudiced to be published.
This was the issue in the case of Chris Jefferies. Jefferies was arrested by police pending the
investigation of the murder of Joanna Yeates, he was her landlord. The Sun and Mirror subjected
Chris Jeffries to a number character–assassinating and printed several front page headlines which
suggested that Jefferies was guilty while the investigation continued such as 'Could this man hold
the key to Joanna's murder?. The defamatory articles strongly suggested that there was good reason
to suspect that Mr Jefferies had murdered Joanna Yeates. Two days after Mr Jefferies was arrested,
he was released and police confirmed he was no longer a suspect. Joanna 's neighbor, Vincent Tabak
was found guilty of her murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. By this time Mr Jefferies
photograph had been splashed on the front page of several papers making him instantly
recognizable. The newspapers lost because they had wrongly published untrue and harmful articles
about Jefferies while he was in custody and

State V. Lee Case Analysis
In all criminal cases, Defendants have the right to Due Process of law and essentially has the right to
waive their presence during their trial. In Kathy Robert's case she was bound and gagged but not
removed from the court entirely. In State v. Lee, Lee was first removed from the court after several
interruptions before being handcuffed and gagged. There are three constitutionally acceptable ways
to approach a disruptive defendant. However; Binding and gagging should be the last resort for the
judge. First, the judge should cite the defendant for contempt of court if continued interruptions
occur. If the defendant remains disrespectful and disruptive they lose their right to be present at the
trial and the judge may remove them from the court until they can control themselves such as the
judge did in State v. Lee. After both actions have been dealt and the defendant is belligerent then the
judge may bind and gag ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For a judge to cite the defendant for contempt, they will get fined and possible jail time if found
guilty regardless of crime. It also gives the defendant several warnings to remain silent without
restraint or forced out of the courtroom. Finally, citing the defendant for contempt doesn't cause the
defendant to lose their right to freedom of speech or presence during their own criminal trial. The
cons of the binding and gagging of the defendant would bring up the argument of an "unfair trial." If
not warned about the punishments of the defendant's interruptions, the defendant seems to have no
choice but look at it as prejudicial and a one–sided trial. I think the best approach would be to cite
the defendant for contempt because as a judge I would want the defendant to still have his or her
constitutional rights. And if the proceedings cannot continue without disruptive behavior even after
being warned several times, then I would take the necessary steps I discussed in previous

Trial By Media And The Denial Of A Fair Trial
Introduction
Trial by media is a phrase popular in the late 20th century and early 21st century to describe the
impact of television and newspaper coverage on a person's reputation by creating a widespread
perception of guilt or innocence before, or after, a verdict in a court of law. Its first inception was the
phrase Trial by Television which found light in the response to the 3 February, 1967 television
broadcast of The Frost Programme, host David Frost. The confrontation and Frost's personal
adversarial line of questioning of insurance fraudster Emil Savundra led to concern from ITV
executives that it might affect Savundra's right to a fair trial.
During high–publicity court cases, the media are often accused of provoking an atmosphere ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Laudable as it may be, this media activism is also disquieting, and not just because it might partially
be fuelled by a competitive rush to attract larger audiences. Even when well intentioned, recent
coverage of sexual violence has tended to degenerate rapidly into a series of trials by media, with
the media arrogating to itself and the public the powers of both judge and jury. As a consequence,
the media has chipped away at the already precarious agency of assault victims, and also
undermined the possibility of justice being

Trial by Media
Chapter I Introductory The subject of 'Trial by Media' is discussed by civil rights activists,
Constitutional lawyers, judges and academics almost every day in recent times. With the coming
into being of the television and cable–channels, the amount of publicity which any crime or suspect
or accused gets in the media has reached alarming proportions. Innocents may be condemned for no
reason or those who are guilty may not get a fair trial or may get a higher sentence after trial than
they deserved. There appears to be very little restraint in the media in so far as the administration of
criminal justice is concerned. We are aware that in a democratic country like ours, freedom of
expression is an important right but such aright is not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Zee Telefilms (IA 8185/2003 in Suit No. 1543/2003 dated 24.1.2005) aptly describe the state of
affairs of today's media. He says that journalism and ethics stand apart. While journalists are
distinctive facilitators for the democratic process to function without hindrance the media has to
follow the virtues of 'accuracy, honesty, truth, objectivity, fairness, balanced reporting, respect or
autonomy of ordinary people'. These are all part of the democratic process. But practical
considerations, namely, pursuit of successful career, promotion to be obtained, compulsion of
meeting deadlines and satisfying Media Managers by meeting growth targets, are recognized as
factors for the 'temptation to print trivial stories salaciously presented'. In the temptation to sell
stories, what is presented is what 'public is interested in' rather than 'what is in public interest'.
Suspects and accused apart, even victims and witnesses suffer from excessive publicity and invasion
of their privacy rights. Police are presented in poor light by the media and their morale too suffers.
The day after the report of crime is published; media says 'Police have no cue'. Then, whatever
gossip the media gathers about the line of investigation by the official agencies, it gives such
publicity in respect of the information that the person who has indeed committed the crime, can
move away to safer places. The pressure on the police from media day by day builds up and reaches
a stage where police feel

The Fourteenth Amendment 's Due Process Clause Bars...
Judge Simon Skinner and Judge Leslie Tiller are judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth
Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, respectively. Each judge has an
involved history with Minnesota's governor, Joyce Cooper. In this paper, I address whether the
Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause bars Skinner and Tiller from hearing two unique cases
to which Cooper is a party. I conclude that, for both judges in both cases, it does not.
* * *
I begin with the relationship between Judge Skinner and Governor Cooper, who are related in two
ways, one significant and the other less so. First, and less significantly, Cooper taught Skinner
construction law at Minnesota's flagship law school. Skinner would later own a construction
company of his own, NWA Construction. Upon his confirmation to the 8th Circuit, Skinner sold the
company, in its entirety, to his son.
More significantly, Cooper, then serving as chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, actively
lobbied to confirm Skinner to the 8th Circuit after his nomination. Cooper contacted all other
members of the Senate, promising them gratitude and a "yay" vote on a future federal judge
nominee for a "yay" vote on Skinner's confirmation. Cooper even targeted 51 other Senators, for
whom she held fundraisers that raised $58,000 per Senator. These fundraisers occurred immediately
before the Senate's vote on Skinner's confirmation, and all 51 Senators for whom Cooper
fundraised–and Cooper

Giles Corey Quotes From The Crucible
Character Personality Traits "I will not give you no name." This quote was said by Giles Corey in
The Crucible. He said this when Judge Hathorne asked for a name that Giles promised not to say in
court. This caused Giles to be arrested and ultimately killed. Giles Corey and I share some of the
same traits such as being cunning, being sarcastic, and being loyal. Giles Corey and I are both
cunning. Giles Corey is cunning by knowing the court system. He shows this when Danforth tries to
accuse Giles of contempt of court but Giles says, "This is a hearing; you cannot clap me for the
contempt of a hearing," which shows Giles' knowledge in the court system. I'm cunning by thinking
of ideas thoroughly and quickly. I'm able to think of a plan quick

Shoemaker Case Summary
On July 23, 2013, appellant, Jason Shoemaker ("Mr. Shoemaker") was awarded an absolute divorce
from appellee, Fallon Shoemaker ("Ms. Shoemaker"). The trial judge incorporated a voluntary
separation and property settlement agreement signed by both parties into the judgment of absolute
divorce. Thereafter, on May 6, 2014, the parties modified their separation agreement by executing
and filing a consent order with the circuit court. On July 17, 2014, Ms. Shoemaker filed a petition
for contempt alleging that Mr. Shoemaker breached the consent order. On September 24, 2014, the
Circuit Court for Frederick County held a hearing where it determined that Mr. Shoemaker was in
contempt of the consent order, and that Mr. Shoemaker had not shown that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Shoemaker] shall pay to [Ms. Shoemaker], alimony in an amount of Four Thousand Five Hundred
Dollars ($4,500.00) per month for Year One (first 12 months), Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00)
per month for Years Two through Five (second 48 months), and Four Thousand Five Hundred
Dollars ($4,500.00) per month for Years Six through Sixteen (final 120 months), for her support, on
the first day of each month starting on the first day of August, 2012, for so long as the parties live
separate and apart and until the first to occur of any of the following events: (a) death of either party,
(b) that date which is sixteen (16) years from the date of this Agreement, or (c) [Ms. Shoemaker]
remarries. Thereafter, a series of disputes arose between the parties as to the others' performance
under the terms of the separation agreement. Mr. Shoemaker alleged that the separation agreement
was induced by fraud because at the time of the agreement Ms. Shoemaker had acquired a
significant other whom she intended to sustain with Mr. Shomaker's alimony payments. Ms.
Shoemaker, for her part, alleged that Mr. Shoemaker was in violation of the custody and visitation
terms of the agreement that required Mr. Shoemaker to abstain from illicit drug use. Ms. Shoemaker
further alleged that Mr. Shoemaker was in default of his child support and alimony payments under
the separation

Greene Vs Cv-799 Case Study
IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF CHESTER COUNTY, TENNESSEE AMANDA LEANN
GREENE PLANTIFF/RESPONDENT VS. NO. 14–CV–799 KEVIN WESLEY BARTHOLOMEW
DEFENDANT/PETITIONER RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR MODIFICATION AND FOR
CONTEMPT Comes now your Respondent, Amanda LeAnn Greene, in support of Response to
Petition for Modification and Contempt would state and show unto this Honorable Court as follows:
Agreed Agreed Agreed Agreed Denied. The mother has stable employment and has tested negative
on multiple urine drug screen within the past year. The mother does not live with someone with such
charge. The mother was injured on the job in March 2016, which was known

Biography Of Donald J. Trump
On Friday, August 25, Donald J. Trump issued his first pardon as president on Arizona sheriff Joe
Arpaio for defying a federal court order. Joseph Michael Arpaio was born in June 14, 1932, and is
still a former law enforcer in the state of Arizona. He is known for his stances on illegal immigration
and leading an investigation on the validity of Barack Obama's birth certificate. He has been accused
of abusing power, misuse of funding, failure in researching on sexual crimes, unlawful enforcement
on illegal immigration, election law violations, and racial profiling (especially targeting Hispanics).
Not only has he committed different types of police misconduct, but he has been sued for many civil
rights lawsuits, and even the U.S. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This whole federal case began by a lawsuit filled by a Mexican man with a valid tourist visa in
Maricopa County. After stopping the man, Joe Arpaio wrongfully gave the man a nine–hour
detention, the man sued him, claiming racial profiling from deputies, later involving all Latino
motorists in the county. After four years of court cases and hearings, a judge in Phoenix ordered him
to stop detaining anyone, even based on suspicion. "... States do not have the inherent authority to
enforce the civil provisions of federal immigration law," declared the judge.
Five years later, since December of 2011, two federal judges have found Joseph guilty of not
following and abiding to the injunction, still having misbehavior in police conduct. U.S. District
Judge G. Murray stated that he was saying false statements of his department, and that Arpaio and
his chief deputy , "have a history of obfuscation and subversion of this Court's orders that is as old
as this case and did not stop after they themselves became the subjects of civil contempt." The judge
understood based on his mannerisms that he had no desire to declare the truth or comply with
answering the asked questions. So the judge decided to charge Joe Arpaio of criminal contempt of
court, with a possible sentence of six moths in the county jail. Five years later, since December of
2011, two federal judges have found

In Our Defense. Amendments Essay
In Our Defense The title of this book is In Our Defense. It is written by Ellen Alderman and
Caroline Kennedy. This book was copyrighted in 1991 and the First Avon Books edition was
published in 1992. The genre is nonfiction, law. This book is about all of our rights as citizens of the
United States of America and cases that prove as to why these rights are so important to us. There
are, however, some controversies on the extent of how far these rights go. The first amendment most
importantly protects freedom of speech. Dennis Mahon, a member of the KKK, was trying to
exercise his freedom of speech, through airing a television program called "Race and Reason." The
Missouri Knights group chose public cable access to broadcast because ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Then Pevar, who is Mahons's attorney, filed a suit in the federal district stating that the Klan had
been discriminated against by the content of its speech and also that the access channel was a public
forum that the city did not have a right to take away. They said it violated the first amendment rights
of the Klan and the other people who have the right to watch uncensored programs. The city tried to
have to suit dismissed by telling them that they could use other means of reaching out to their
audiences other than the television. The Klan did end up winning their case and their show was
restarted, and there rights were protected. In the end the Reverend Cleaver became the mayor and
canceled the show anyway. The second amendment is the right to bear arms. In June of 1981 the
trustees of the town of Morton Grove, Illinois voted in favor of a law which prohibited the
possession of handguns in the home. A lawyer and gun owning resident, Victor Quilici filed a
lawsuit challenging the law claiming that it violated his Second Amendment right. The district court
ruled that the Second Amendment does not apply to the states, that the right to bear arms is
inextricably connected to the preservation of a militia that state legislatures may regulate or restrict
state legislatures, and municipalities may limit private access to weapons under their power to
provide for the public health and safety. The US Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's
decision. The third

Violation Of Court
When one parent does not follow a court order that has been established, civil contempt of court is a
remedy that the parties can seek from the court. While it is highly recommended that the parties try
to resolve such matters informally prior to seeking relief from the court, contempt is available when
those efforts fail and there has been a willful violation of a court order.
Once a court order is in place, whether it relates to custody, visitation, or support, both parents have
to follow it. If one parent doesn't follow the order, the other parent can file a contempt action and
ask the court to enforce the existing order. This is the case even if the parent thinks that he or she has
a good reason for not complying with the order. For instance, if you don't think it would be in the
best interest of your child to visit with his or her other parent, so you don't follow the court–ordered
visitation plan, you could be held in contempt of court. If you don't think the existing visitation
order is good for your child, then you need to file an action with the court to modify the order. Not
following the order can lead to serious consequences, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The court will order the party who is allegedly not complying with the court order to appear in court
and defend his or her position. The only defenses available are that the party did not violate the court
order as alleged, or that the violation of the order was not willful, and in some circumstances that
obeying the order would endanger the child due to circumstances that have changed. Typically,
contempt proceedings occur much more quickly than divorce or other types of family law hearings,
since they focus on only a few relatively straightforward issues. The focus in a contempt hearing is
whether a party violated the court order and what the court should do about

The Law Of Contempt

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Ashley Fisher

More from Ashley Fisher (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Law Of Contempt