How Did The Articles Of Confederation A Strong Form Of...

How Did The Articles Of Confederation A Strong Form Of...
The Articles of Confederation wasn't a strong form of government. Both of these documents show
this is true and these documents also show that there are people concerned. The first problem that
arose with the Articles of Confederation is the lack of a chief executive. In Washington's first quote
he says that he is concerned because our country is slowly moving towards anarchy. An anarchy is a
problem that spirals out of control because there is no leader. Therefore, Washington feels that we
are running into issues because we don't have a leader and someone to take control. The British
thought of the United States would break down for this reason. Without a leader, there's no structure
because there are too many opinions going around. There
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Restoration of Strong Government Under Henry VII Essay
The Restoration of Strong Government Under Henry VII
Henry VII's relations with the nobility are controversial, but views of his success are subjective.
When discussing degrees of success, there must be criteria on which to judge the subject. In this
case 'restoration of strong government' can be measured by a close study of what Henry VII set out
to achieve and whether he fulfilled his aims. He appreciated the nobility's importance in local
governance and did not want to 'crush' them, but merely control and limit their power, preventing
rebellion and civil war. This essay examines the level of success Henry had in implementing his
methods.
I agree to an extent that the nobility was the main ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He did this by rewarding 37 proven loyal nobles with the Order of Garter. This was the highest
award of chivalry, but was without the financial obligations of titles. Thus, Henry successfully
managed the number of nobles creating a select, loyal, controllable group.
Henry had close interest in the marriages of the nobility because under the feudal system, his
permission was required for marriage. In the Middle Ages, it was common for powerful nobles to
marry heiresses creating vast estates over which they had almost complete power. To stop this
happening, Henry "ensured that leading magnates and their sons did not marry heiresses, thus
preventing the creation of 'super–nobles'. This prevented families such as the Stafford's and the
Percy's from becoming too powerful. He also gave the inheritance of many unmarried women to the
Crown. In this way Henry was really successful in limiting the power of nobility.
Henry, whilst respecting the local authority of the nobles, minimised their power in his central
council. As Carpenter says, "the only men who Henry really did trust were certain officials...mostly
of gentry region." Not all Henry's advisors were gentry, but many were. Sir Richard Empson and
Edmund Dudly were mere lawyers and yet, tow of the most powerful people in the country in their
roles as heads

Analysis Of Porter 's Five Forces
Nowadays, organizations is facing rapid change to the business environment where it becomes more
complex than it were before. Indeed, these situation means that businesses need to find strategy to
analyzing the implications of these changes and modifying the organizations reaction itself towards
these situation. The strategies that the organization will apply also require gaining a complete
understanding of the external environment of the organization. While understanding the macro–
environment of the business is important, organization also need to have great understanding of the
competitors and the impact they will bring to the organization (Dobbs, 2014). In 1979, Michael E.
Porter, a Harvard Business School student introduced five key forces that determined the essential
appeal of a business sector in a long run (Schachter, 2012). Porter's Five Forces is a framework that
analyzes and identifies strategy of an industry, and also determines the weakness and strength of an
industry, where the activities of the competitors also involved. Porter's Five Forces is cover
understanding strategy of bargaining power of supplier, bargaining power of buyer, competitive
rivalry, threat of substitution, and lastly threat of new entry. In addition, by having good
understanding where the power rely on, businesses may take advantage by gaining strength or
improve the weakness and evade taking wrong decision. Porter's Five Forces will help organizations
to define the market properly and

The Anti-Federalists: A Strong Central Government
The Federalist believed that there should be a strong central government . The Anti–Federalist
believed in less power in government and more in the people and to have our rights guaranteed.
Based on the Bill of Rights and the way it was interpreted the Anti–Federalists were right. The rights
and freedoms the Bill of Rights Provides are significant. One of the rights it gives us is Freedom of
speech with the right to protest peacefully. This allows us to voice our opinions on topics and issues
without fear of repercussion . Another right it gives us is the right to take up and bare arms. This
allows us to buy and keep guns and use them in a safe manner. The perspective of the Bill of Rights
has changed over time . One group this applies

Strong Central Government: The Articles Of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation was established to the Constitution of many states as a weak central
government. People are believing that the weakness in the AOC give the republic subject to foreign
attack and domestic affairs. Madison persuaded the states' rights advocate John Taylor to call for a
meeting in the Annapolis, Maryland to address problems of commerce among the states. Madison
led Virginia delegation to the Philadelphia which on May 14, 1787 and supported the cry for George
Washington to act as its chair When Washington accepted the body achieved for the moral authority
it needed to draft a new constitution. In the following weeks, Madison appeared as the floor leader
of those leaders supporting a strong central government. A person

Strong National Government
Introduction We as the people should maintain the most crucial political power within our
designated states. Let's not allow one entity to govern all of us, when those representatives do not
know what each state and those who live in it need. Our focus must remain on us. A strong National
Government under the Constitution would give them too much power. Maintaining a "direct
representative of the people, Congress/Legislative, to be the power of the government is in our best
interest" ("Legislative Branch | whitehouse.gov," n.d.). Utilizing our own people who understand our
needs, working these lands, is what will maintain our unity and allow us the best defense to protect
ourselves. Without the need to rely on those who do not understand the people as a whole. With the
support of economic elites we can surely expect that our needs as lower class and in rural areas will
be forgotten. As we gain strength and dominance within these parts of the Americas, we ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In order to protect our rights as those who live and work on these lands, we must amend the bill of
rights. As a whole we are stronger.
The Federalist want the central government to hold more people, which means a division of these
smaller governments. Let's give our local Governments the opportunity to address our own needs,
our own issues that affect our people here. We need to deal with what happens here first before we
can help anyone else. Be reducing the bureaucracy that is involved with taking care of the people,
we are the source. Who would know better how to protect us than our own state.
If the government receives more power, they will then have control of our resources, the resources
we have would be based on the needs of each region instead of to our state. What will happen when
we try to progress our State? How will this impact our educational system and our economy? These
are questions we need to ask and a situation we need to

The Inca 's Strong Government And Hierarchy
The elaborate and innovative structure of the Inca's strong government and hierarchy was an
interesting and different strategy compared to the other empires during this time, but this complex
strategy ended up being the most effective plan. Envisioned by the Inca emperor Pachacuti, the new
system of government and hierarchy would allow the Inca empire to expand, yet still be controlled.
The different strategy led to the rapid progression of the Inca Empire from Chile to Colombia 1. The
Inca empire in many ways was an innovative society, with many different techniques in social class,
government, expansion, and socioeconomics that helped create their dominance in the americas.
There have been many different ways that empires have been ruled, some became successful and
dominant and others got too overwhelmed by the power and responsibility of running an empire.
The Incas created an innovative government system called a bureaucracy 2. The Inca government
had many different policies and plans in place for the empire to progress and maintain its power,
such as: having a distinguished hierarchy with the Sapa Inca and Coya at the top, followed by the
Council of Nobles 3. Another policy that the Incas had in place was that the empire was divided into
four parts 4. The Incas were able to thrive because of the support and structure of the government.
The classes of the Inca civilians were separated into three different hierarchies: social class, religion,
and military. At the

What Are The Pros And Cons Of A Strong Central Government
Strong Or Weak: Arguments over the Federal Government In November of 2001, the United States
was still reeling from the attacks on September 11 of that same year. President George W. Bush
created a new organization to prevent future attacks on American flyers. The organization was called
the Transportation Security Administration, or TSA. The TSA was tasked with implementing
security measures to protect travelers. At first, the measures were welcomed by the public. They
were seen as a necessary measure to protect against future 9/11 style attacks. But now, 15 years
later, the measures the TSA have put in place have been questioned repeatedly by members of the
public, the press and congress. Incidents such as the Underwear Bomber, where a Nigerian ... Show
They argue that the state governments are not extensive enough to provide these services and many
others and that a strong central government will be able to provide these services more effectively.
Take for example, the national parks, which are managed by the National Park Service and are a
piece of American culture. Strong central government advocates say that states cannot maintain a
uniform standard of upkeep, because of the differences of politics and cultures. The state parks and
wildlife in Georgia are managed differently than the parks and wildlife in California. They claim
that a federal government is necessary to make sure that all parks are kept up and well maintained,
to provide a pleasurable experience for all who attend. Some believe that the government is too
small, and should expand. I believe that the government should not expand, but should shrink
slightly. Of course, America needs a uniform currency and a single armed forces, but local and state
control over matters which relate to them can result in a streamlined government process, leaving
the matters of national importance to the national government. Overall, whether a national
government is stronger or weaker, America still has the greatest governmental structure in the world.
It may have flaws, but it has and will continue to persevere through

How Government Should Operate A Strong Central Government
In 1787, a set of new proposals for how government should operate came into action to what is
known today as the "Virginia Plan", which had the primary purpose of creating a strong central
government. This plan consisted of the proposals to divide the powers of the federal government
among three separate branches. These three branches were the legislative branch, the executive
branch, and the judicial branch.
The legislative branch is used for making laws and is also identified as Congress. Congress consists
of two chambers, the House of Representatives, and the Senate. Those in the House of
Representatives have to be reelected every two years in order to remain in the House. Additionally,
there are a grand total of 435 members of the House, and the number per state fluctuate depending
on state populations. The House has the power to initiate bills and select the President if there is a tie
in the Electoral College. The Head of this chamber is known as the Speaker of the House.
The second chamber is the Senate. In contrast of the House of Representatives, members of the
Senate are voted upon every 6 years, and there are 100 Senators total, 2 for each state. The Senate
has the power to try impeachment cases for government officials, if directed to do so by the house.
The head of this chamber is the Vice President of the United States.
In order for a law to actually be created, it is required that both the House of Representatives and the
Senate approve a bill before it gets

Free Great Gatsby Essays: The Power Of Choice
The Power of Choice In life, some people find themselves stuck in sticky situations where they have
to make decisions ranging from minute problems to important life or death decisions. The main
character, Anna, found herself conflicted while attempting to choose whether or not she should keep
medically assisting her sister, Kate, in her fight against Leukemia. Jodi Picoult develops the theme
of choice by highlighting unique relationships between Anna and Kate, Campbell and Julia, as well
as Sara and Anna. Anna and Kate Fitzgerald reflect an authentic bond of sisterhood, best friends in
addition to as sisters that bicker. Born as a perfect match donor in order to save Kate who battles
Leukemia, they rely on each other on an everyday basis physically. This sprouts an unique aspect of
sisterhood as Kate would die without ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During their college years Campbell and Julia sprouted a magical love that they hoped would last
forever, however on graduation day Campbell made the choice to leave Julia. Due to Campbell's
rocky past, staying with Julia seemed unrealistic in order for the two of them to be successful as
individuals. He worried if Julia stayed with him, she would lose her drive to be independent and
successful. When Campbell and Julia's paths crossed again later in life, a strong force emerged
between them showing clear signs they had a past. As Campbell began working with Anna and her
case, he started to relate to Anna due to their pasts, they both found themselves invisible to their
parents. Watching Anna battle through her struggles Campbell opened up his eyes and he knew he
could get through life as well. Campbell overcome his fears of taking success away from Julia, and
they married in the end. While Campbell eventually opened his eyes up to his surroundings while
Sara, Anna's mother, struggled to see the world in the viewpoints of

The Aoc: Strong Central Government
The Aoc(Articles of Confederation) had strong independent states, but weak central government.
The constitution had a strong central government, with certain powers reserved to states. One of the
weaknesses in the Aoc was the unicameral Legislature that is set up.The Constitution had a
bicameral legislature that is, a congress composed of two separate chambers,the senate and the
house of representatives.The two separate legislative chambers were a big advantage the
Constitution had over the one legislative chamber the Articles of Confederation had.
One of the things that made the Articles of Confederation unique was that all 13 states had to agree
to any amendment of the federal government's powers.This made the Articles of Confederation
weaker

Thomas Hobbes Idea Of A Strong Authoritarian Government
I think that Hobbes's idea of a strong authoritarian government would probably justify the US policy
about surveillance. Since a commonwealth is instituted mainly to protect the people, who have
singed this social contract in order to escape from the short and poor life of the state of nature, the
sovereign should do whatever it is necessary to guarantee protection to its own citizens. In fact, as
Hobbes says: if a government is no longer able to keep people safe, then the social contract is no
valid anymore. So, assuming that the US policy main goal is to protect Americans from external
threatens (i.e. terroristic attacks), it is in line with Hobbes's argument.
Furthermore, Hobbes does not say that people do not have their own liberty under

Summary of Proud Family Show
The first episode was aired in the year 2001 on the Disney Channel.
Main Characters:
Family Characters are Penny, Oscar, Trudy, Suga' Mama, baby brother Cece, and baby sister Bebe.
Friend Characters: Dijonay, Zoey, Sticky, and LaCienega.
Bullies: The Gross Sisters
The show is about a African American 14 year old teenager, Penny Proud, and her life in a wacky
family, her eccentric friends, and even the bullies in her life.
This show shows a lot of stereotypes among all races.
For example: The shapes of the females that were not Caucasian had more curvature at the hips and
a smaller waists'.
Over Turning the Feminine Mystique
This myth states that women are the weaker sex, should be the nurturers of the family, and that they
do not belong in the work place.
The women in the proud family are mothers, but they are very strong and intelligent women.
Many of the women in the Proud Family have high paying jobs; such as the main characters mother
is a doctor, another mother is an officer of the law, and someone else's mother is a judge.
Over Turning the Feminine Mystique (Continued)
This show portrays women being just as strong as men on many occasions, for example:
When Penny Proud, the main character, tries out for the all boys football team at her school, she is
ungraciously turned down and made fun of by the coach and a majority of the players. They were all
against her joining the team solely because she was a

Conservatism In The 1970s
"War what is it good for? Absolutely nothing!" This message continually echoed among the
American public during the 1970s, emphasizing its voice of protest against the Vietnam War. In
contrast with the rise of counterculture in the 1960s, the 1970s saw the rise of conservatism; the
desire to revert back to America's traditional social and religious values. During this time Americans
endured a loss of confidence from an unstable economy, an energy crisis, and ongoing action in
Vietnam, and Americans thought that conservatism would provide stability. In the 1970s, Americans
saw the rise of Motown in the music industry, which fit the mold of conservatism. Protest music
became popular as a response to the Vietnam War, attracting Vietnam veterans as well as the
younger ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1984, the British synth–pop act, Frankie Goes to Hollywood, produced an elongated version of
"War" on their album "Welcome to the Pleasuredome".[25] Frankie Goes to Hollywood
contemporized the song by using the background of the Cold War. Later in 1985 Bruce Springsteen
and the E Street Band revitalized "War" for their world tour. Their version of "War" condemned
American intervention in El Salvador and Nicaragua during the 1980s.[26] Springsteen transformed
the song to widescreen with his "War" music video which showed the separation of families and
footage of Vietnam. [27] Over the years, "War" conveyed the ongoing struggle peace through the
perspectives of various artists. Edwin Starr transformed an obvious point of protest into a revelation
through his enthusiasm and dedication towards the music. "War" changed the conservative face of
Motown through the power of its lyrics and widespread support of its anti–war message. "War"
generated momentum and motivation among the public. America became forever united under an
anthem of

My Personal Statement : Bijay Shrestha
Personal Statement – Bijay Shrestha
Respected Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your time to read my application. I believe that having read my personal statement,
you will have a clear picture of my development, enthusiasm, and experiences in physics.
Physics is a mathematical formulation and concepts that undeniably works. Being able to write
down a handful equations on a piece of paper which explains as well as predicts the outcome of an
observation is truly enchanting. This is what ignites aspiration and curiosity which led me to pursue
a career in physics. Understanding the working mechanism of the universe is surely perplexing.
However, this intricacy inspires me to behold the elegance of the physics. Furthermore, applying
physics and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Our MD simulation is carried out using GROMACS and the trajectories are visualized and also
analyzed using VMD under Linux platform. We have performed a series of atomistic MD
simulations to understand the dynamic and structural properties of the micelle formation. The
ultimate goal of the study is to explore the plausibility of employing the self–assembly of a novel
bolaamphiphilic molecule, called VECAR, as a drug–delivery system. A manuscript of the result is
currently in preparation to be submitted to a peer–reviewed journal. Currently, I am working on
developing a coarse–grained force field of the VECAR molecule using VOTCA to be able to
simulate much larger scale system composed of micelles interacting with a bilayer membrane in a
reasonable computation time. In the spring 2017 semester, plan to write an undergraduate thesis
summarizing my research results. On publishing the thesis, Upon the completion of the thesis, a
distinction "Honor Research Scholar" would be awarded.
Participating in a research project for three years in a row, I have learned beyond the academic
realm. The experiences of working in the lab and attending professional conferences have helped me
believe that there is more to learn and motivate me to bridge the gap between the classroom and the
real–world science. This research experience has given me a valuable insight into a life of a
researcher, all the highs, and lows that come along as the research progresses. Moreover, I have been

The Need for a Strong Central Government
Governance system in the USA The contemporary society poses quite a number of challenges to the
social, environmental, economic and political front. Without the help of a governance system that is
stable and bears direct impact on the individual citizens in practically the entire nation, it is very
likely that the nation will suffer under the weight of these challenges named above. The federal
system of governance has and continues to present one of the best governance systems in the world
whose democracy is copied due to the stable environment it provides hence there is no need to
change it to a more centralized governance system. This is a system that is in existence in developed
nations like Australia and Canada among others with even the developing countries like Brazil,
India and Mexico already practicing it. There are various factors that appeal in the federal system
over the centralized governance system. It is worth noting that each region has economic, social and
political challenges that are peculiar to the region or the province. The provincial government is
much closer to the people of the region hence understanding their challenges better than a central
government. This leads to fiscal decentralization rather than extraction of resources from the
periphery and directing them to the central government without trickle down effects (Steve W.
2007). Bearing the diversity that is in the USA, there are people with varied aspirations, cultures and
even

Advantages Of A Strong Federal Government
In late eighteenth–century America, the ideal form of government was widely contested. When the
American colonies were under British rule, they were subject to the almost–tyrannical British
government, in which they were not fully represented. After the colonies achieved independence,
two main political factions emerged: the Republicans and the Federalists. The Republicans, scarred
by the overbearing British government, advocated for a weak federal government with individual
state governments, which prevented the concentration of power in a single party and promoted a
form of more direct representation. However, this system proved to be ineffective, for the federal
government's lack of power was dangerous and inefficient. The Federalists, on the other hand,
supported a strong federal government. Cognizant of the negative implications of local state
governments, the Federalists published a series of essays during 1787 and 1788 that supported the
stronger national government that resulted from the Constitutional Convention. In "Federalist no.
51", James Madison, a key component of the Federalist movement, described the role of
government and its relationship with the people. He wrote,
"If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither
external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is
to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the

Why Is The Most Fearful Of A Strong Central Government Too...
The Bill of Rights, written by Antifederalists, shows us how some Americans were fearful of a
strong central government, how they wanted a limited government so it wasn't too powerful, and
how they protected basic individual rights. The Anti–federalists begged and argued for a new list
that secured the rights they believed the original Constitution did not provide. There was a constant
debate between whether or not to add the Bill of Rights, because some people thought that if they
created it, all other rights were insignificant. Many Americans were fearful that the government was
going to have too much power because of the Constitution, but they felt secure if they made a list of
their official rights. Most of the people who wanted the Bill of Rights, were poor people, who felt
they needed a say in the government.
Americans were very apprehensive about what power the government would have and they didn't
want the new United States to become like England, which had a strong central government.
Amendment 1 talks about our original rights and the rights Congress cannot make laws against. It
says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," and "... freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble," (Amendment 1). This
shows us that they were fearful of King George's violation of these essential rights. Since King
George didn't follow these, they decided that it would be a good idea to make it an official law. This

The Role Of A Strong Central Government
Subsequently, the Federalist wanted to accomplish the opposite of Anti–federalist. Their mission
was to ratify the constitution, but also establish a strong central government with separation of
powers to help properly manage the debt and tensions resulting from the American Revolution. The
Federalist proposed that the constitution was sufficient enough to protect the people rights. The
Federalists supposed that a strong central government was essential to governor uncooperative
states. They believed that a strong central government was compulsory if the states were going to
group together to establish a nation. A strong central government could characterize the nation to
other countries. It could also regulate individual states that would not collaborate with the rest. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Federalists were not frightened of the central government shaped by the Constitution because it had
three branches–the executive, legislative, and judicial–that could bound each other's power. That
way, the central government could not become too excessively

Strong National Government
To begin with, the advantages of a "small" state include if there is any issue that specifically needs
to consulted it can immediately be addressed. Moreover, the smaller the state it results in more self
representation in the state. Additionally, an advantage of a "small" state is they have the ability to
define private property. Moreover, the states have the power to define property (Ginsberg 68). But
also they have the ability to control citizens way of life. On the other hand, a disadvantage of a
"smaller" means they would be isolated and will not be aware of other issues around them. Another
disadvantage is they had obligations due to the United States. (Ginsberg 68).
Moreover, the advantage of local government is that they have the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
A national government has the ability to retain armed forces, make coin money, and start foreign
policy. Additionally, a national government has the ability to control all interstate and overseas trade.
But also they have the advantage to install certain measurements and poundage for each shipment.
Also, another advantage of a strong national government is they can create laws that are necessary
and genuinely for carrying out delegated powers. Another benefit of a strong national government
includes having the power to admit new states and create more post offices. In addition, national
government has the ability to either built or sponsored a construction. For example, roads, canals,
and bridges. On the other hand, some of the disadvantages of a strong national government is
included in Module 2, Lecture 2. In which, it states "National Government could not levy taxes or
regulate commerce between the states" (Module 2, Lecture 2). Another disadvantage of national
government that is mentioned in chapter 3 Federalism that states "under the traditional system, the
national government was quite small by comparison both with states governments and with the
governments of other Western nation. (Ch.3,

Strong Centralized Government Essay
By the end of the early Middle Ages, the territories of both England and France had divided into
several small kingdoms, each governed by a separate leader. These kingdoms were in states of chaos
because they lacked a strong centralized government. By the 12th century, trade began to grow,
which led to the creation of towns. The towns' citizens initially paid taxes to the feudal nobles, but
with the development of a strong middle class, taxes were paid to the king alone. Without tax
income, the nobles' power weakened and the power of the king increased. Thus, a strong centralized
government began to form. As the French and English kings' strengthened their power, established
strong centralized governments, and diminished the power of the nobles, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Magna Carta, a charter signed by King John in 1215, ensured that the people of England would
receive basic political rights such as Habeas Corpus, the right to a court trial, and no taxation
without representation. It also restrained the king's power by proclaiming that he was not above the
law. Although the Magna Carta did not strengthen the king's power, or relinquish that of the nobles',
it was an essential step in laying the foundation for democracy, as it gave the commoners a voice
and prevented the monarchs from ruling with absolute power. Soon after, Louis IX, king of France,
created the appeals court. The appeals court was where those who contradicted a court ruling could
go, and it had the power to [annul, quash] the local courts. This court was important, as it prevented
the majority of unjust and prejudiced punishments that could be ruled against someone. Both the
Magna Carta and the appeals court were fundamental in laying the foundation for democracy,
because they granted the commoners basic political rights and somewhat sheltered them from the
law, Although, the Magna Carta was more so, as it restrained the king's

Ancient Egypt's Strong And Well-Organized Government
Ancient Egypt had a strong and well–organized government for many reasons. Pharaohs are
exemplary when it comes to representing a well–organized government. They are the top dogs of
Egypt. These rulers had dynasties which ruled over Egypt, sort of like the Caracalla dynasty of
Rome. There were over 30 dynasties in Egypt. An instance of a dynasty was king Ramesses the
second. Additionally, there were rules to being a pharaoh and how these rulers are proclaimed. This
shows well–organized government because it is preventing people from randomly declaring
themselves pharaoh and keeps the citizen of Egypt in line. One rule, for example, is that a Pharaoh
could have many wives, but only one could be the great wife. The great wife's son would be the

Hot And Cold: An Investigation Of Enthalpy Changes Occurring
Hot and Cold: An Investigation of Enthalpy Changes Occurring During Various Types of Reactions
Hannah McCall
Chemistry 101 Laboratory, Section 005
Instructor: Lisi Wang
April 11, 2017
My signature indicates that this document represents my own work. Outside of shared data, the
information, thoughts and ideas are my own except as indicated in the references. I have submitted
an electronic copy through Blackboard to be scanned by TurnItIn.com. In addition, I have not given
aid to another student on this assignment.
Discussion and Scientific Explanations
Construction of Calorimeter After building the calorimeters, the formula (Heat Capacity) = ((Heat
lost by hot water) –(Heat gained by cold ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is because the equation for the equation of this reaction is HCl + NH4 Thus, the enthalpy
changes for the reaction between 6M HCl and 1M NaOH had an enthalpy change of approximately
one sixth of the enthalpy change for the reaction between 1M HCl and 1M NaOH.
According to our results, again looking at Table 2, we can say that reacting a strong acid with a
weak base results in lower enthalpy change than reacting a strong acid with a strong base. This is
because the enthalpy changes during the reactions between HCl, a strong acid, and NH4OH, a weak
base, were –51.35 and –46.92 kJ/mole, while the enthalpy changes during the reactions between
HCl and NaOH, a strong base, were –61.87 and –65.16 kJ/mole. Although the difference between
these values is not that large, because the values for the respective reactions are consistent and have
little difference between them, we can conclude that the reaction between a strong acid and a strong
base has a greater magnitude of enthalpy change than the reaction between a strong acid and a weak
base.
According to our results, the reaction between a weak acid and a strong base results in a greater
magnitude of enthalpy change than the reaction between a strong acid and a strong base because the
enthalpy changes for the reactions between CH3COOH, a weak acid, and NaOH, a strong base, had
enthalpy changes of

Fundamental Differences Between Strong Mayor And...
Discuss the fundamental differences between weak mayor, strong mayor and council–manager
forms of government. In the United States of America, there are two forms of government that most
cities adhere to, Mayor–Council and Council–Manager. However, there is a third form of
government that a smaller few adhere to call the commission. Moreover, approximately 59% of the
cities in the United States utilize the Council–Manager form of government; conversely 33% utilize
the Mayor–Council form of government, which means the remaining 8% more than likely utilize the
commission form of government. Council–Manager Government In the State of Texas, the Council–
Manager form of government is preferred by all of the major cities, except for Houston who prefer
the Mayor–Council form of government. Under the Council–Manager form of government, the
voters are at the top of the hierarchical structure. In this capacity, the voters elect a small City
Council, including a mayor, who is the presiding officer over the City Council. Although the Mayor
is symbolically the "Head of State", he or she is not the head of government. The Mayor and City
Council have the authority to appoint four of the city's government officials: the City Manager, the
City Attorney, the City Clerk and the Municipal Judge (some cities elect this position). Moreover,
although weak in this form of government, the Mayor has a vote on many issues impacting the city;
however, lacks any type of veto authority (except in a few cities), which means that laws are passed
by on a majority–rule voting system of the total City Council Members, meaning all City Council
Members must vote in order to pass a law. Most importantly, the Mayor and City Council primary
role lies in the establishment of a strategic vision for the city. Once this is accomplished, the Mayor
and the City Council are responsible for generating a strong mission statement that aligns with a set
of clear goals, resulting in effective government policy guidance for execution by the City Manager
to run the city. Collectively, the Mayor and City Council hire the City Manager who has full
management authority, to execute the Mayor's and City Council's vision for the city. However, a
City

Edna Pontellier Internal Conflict Essay
Emma Brennan
Mrs. Schroder
AP Literature
3 January 2018
Edna Pontellier: Her Internal Conflicts
As the main character in Kate Chopin's novel The Awakening, Edna Pontellier experiences strong
internal conflicts that could be influenced by the social standards of the time as well as her close
Creole companions. Throughout the novel we are given a first hand look at how Mrs. Pontellier
deals with these conflicts and in the end, her final decision. Edna Pontellier poses as a double–
minded character struggling with the inclination to satisfy her own desires by carrying out an affair
that has been on her mind or to satisfy society by remaining faithful to her current family. When we
first meet Edna Pontellier, we can notice that she has a strong ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Adele Ratignolle is one prominent woman that we meet throughout the novel, she is even introduced
as a friend of Edna making her more likely to have an influence on Edna. Adele is described as the
perfect mother, she cares for her children and is an attentive wife making her a foil for
Mademoiselle Reisz. Adele is admired by most during this time period because she fits the social
model that Edna has so desperately been struggling to fit into. Despite Edna's own passionate
desires for independence, Adele gives her friendly reminders as to why she should be careful when
associating with Robert and even with Mademoiselle Reisz. Adele even goes far enough to warn
Robert of Edna's unstableness as a mother and wife and hopes that he will no longer flirt with her
but he disregards her warnings and the two continue to have feelings for each other. Although Edna
knows that Adele should be her true role model, Edna goes against the grain and while still having
respect for Adele decides that she is meant for something else. This does not mean that Adele did not
have any sort of influence on Edna however, in fact the main reason for Edna's downfall could have
been the inner conflict between following the societal model that Adele held or to follow her
passions and inner desires like Reisz did.

How Far Does the Westminster Electoral System Ensure...
Westminster is the location of the Houses of Parliament, where the majority of political decisions
(other than those for devolved states) are made for the nation. The current Westminster electoral
system is First Past the Post (FPTP) which is used for general elections every 5 years (due to the
new fixed–term parliaments brought in by the Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition.) The FPTP
system is constituency based, each person votes for a representative for their constituency and
whichever party wins the most constituencies gains governmental power. First Past the Post works
on the basis of a plurality of votes, that is, that the winning party need only gain the most votes out
of all parties to gain power, they do not need an overall ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The First Past The Post system's ability to create single party governments therefore means that that
government will be stable and cohesive. Within parties the majority of people have shared political
ideologies and ideas and so the party elected to government will be able to make decisions quickly
and efficiently as everyone will be aiming towards shared goals or desires for policies. The
governing party will be loyal to their traditional or modern ideologies and will have decided upon
one set of policies in their manifesto before the election and so they will not need a large amount of
discussion and debate before policies are passed. All members of the party will be subject to the
same party disciplines so they will all be following the same rules and working together which again
ensures that the government is stable. A stable government means that parties can pass their desired
policies quickly which will be beneficial to the public as they will feel that the party is doing their
role correctly and efficiently. If a governing party were to not be stable then it may affect their future
election prospects as the public are unlikely to vote in a party that they have previously seen as
unstable.
First Past The Post creates a

A Strong Central Government
A Strong Central Government
Patty Saltkill
PPA 601: Foundations in Public Administration
February 20, 2012
R.D. Robertson
Ashford University
A Strong Central Government Government of any kind is set up to make a country run smother and
with less problems. The United States government should have less ability to override state policy
without proof of why it should be overridden. It should be something that each state has the ability
to defend against and with a panel. Federal policy is about an overall problem but not the problem at
the state level since each state would face cases of different types of problems.
National Policy Washington should not have greater power to dictate national ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Amending the Constitution. If the constitution was amended Washington DC should not be given
any more power over the states. The states should have more power over many things that are state
specific. If Washington is given, more power than it would be less state specific and more
generalized which this country does not need at this time. The country needs leaders who are aware
of the problems at every level and not lumping them into one huge issue that general public cannot
understand. Washington sees the big picture State sees several pictures that form a problem. If it is
looked at from the state point of view then each state can see the problem on their level, choose a
solution, and solve the problem before the crisis stage. If Washington still has the issue then they can
model their solution after state solutions or combine to make a better solution. The only thing in my
opinion that needs more federal power is the education system and levels of the United States. The
United States is getting further and further behind other countries in education and an internal
problem. Those who run the systems earn more than those who are teaching the youth of today and
the leaders of tomorrow. If states cannot afford to pay teachers then the federal government needs to
step in and mandate class size, curriculum, and basic fundamentals so that we as a country

The Federalist Argument: A Strong Central Government
The Federalist argument is one that is defined by a strong central government. Some federalists
included Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. These people were also the authors of
the famous "Federalist Papers", they wrote under the name "Publius". These essays explored
different aspects of federalist ideas about government. Some of their most famous works were
Federalist Papers #51 and #10. In these, Hamilton explored the nature of man from their natural
"ambitions" to the formation of "factions" (Federalist Paper #51, #10). These two papers focused on
suggesting a means of controlling these things, including checks and balances and political parties.
These papers were created very much in the line of federalist thinking. Federalist ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
I would done this because I think the anti–federalist's idea of government is unsustainable and weak.
The anti–federalist view is anchored on the notion of giving the local governments more power, or
devolving power. I believe the people need rights and a sense of efficacy, but what happens when a
foreign nation attacks? How will the United States defend itself effectively and efficiently? Another
problem that arises is how to regulate the printing of money. How would the dollar have a cohesive
use? If not, how would its value be measured? The third question that is brought up is diplomacy.
Who speaks on behalf of the United States? How will the states present itself to a possible trade
partner or ally? All these faults are highlighted in the Articles of Confederation, a document in
which many anti–federalists views are shown. The results of this old constitution are displayed in
Shay's Rebellion, after which, many people questioned the real power of the United States. "We
have felt the feebleness of the ties by which these United–States are held together, and the want of
sufficient energy in our present confederation, to manage, in some instances, our general concerns."
(Brutus I) This shows the faults of the Anti–Federalist's argument for the structure of our
government. As I federalist, I believe in giving states and federal governments power. This could be
the only way

Compare And Contrast Jefferson And Hamilton's View Of...
The original political parties, Federalist and Democratic–Republicans, in America differed in their
view of strong federal government vs strong state government. One leader that helped run the
Federalist was Alexander Hamilton and Hamilton believed in a strong federal government.
Hamilton's plan was to pay off all state debt, pay off all the bonds, and to form a national bank, and
taxes. Which leads to why Hamilton believed we should have a strong federal government. The
federal government would help keep order among the people and unite struggling states. Hamilton's
view of the federal government is it had "implied powers" are powers that are suggested but not
directly given to the government. Hamilton's used the idea of implied powers to help justify a
national bank. Hamilton argued that the "Constitution gave Congress the power to issue money and
regulate trade, and a national bank would clearly help the government carry out these
responsibilities." Thus, Hamilton believed that creating a national bank is within the constitutional
powers of congress. Hamilton wanted a national bank not only because we were in debt from the
war against Great Britain, but also stimulate the economy, by having a more stable paper currency.
In contrast, the Democratic–Republican ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That's why they wanted a strong state government to help advocate state's right and citizens' rights.
Plus, Jefferson feared tyranny and thought in terms of freedom. Many feared it would fall under the
influence of wealthy, urban northeasterners and people from overseas. Also, both Thomas and
Madison believed in a "strict interpretation" of the Constitution. Yes, they accepted implied powers,
but in a more limited sense than Hamilton's plan. They believed that implied powers are powers that
are "absolutely necessary" for congress to practice its state

The Fundamental Forces in Nature
The fundamental forces in nature have been around for centuries. Tying everything together many
scientist and physicist have came about to help with the theories of these fundamental forces which
include gravitation, electromagnetism, strong, and weak forces. Physicist like Maxwell, Newton,
Fermi, Chadwick, and Kepler, have made a strong impact on how people see the world today. These
fundamental forces are what goes on in everyday life and what we still see till this day. The point we
are going to get to are the coming about of these theories and how they are seen in the outside world
and also in physics. In my paper I will be splitting up how the scientist/physicist came to contribute
to the fundamental forces and how each scientist came to contribute to the coming and discovery of
each force. In the second part of the paper I will be describing how each force strong and weak are
used in nature. These topics will help anyone in the search for information on the topic of forces that
came to be due to physics. History of the fundamental forces In 1605 Kepler published the laws of
"planetary motion" which included 3 laws. First law was that every planet is an ellipse with the sun.
Second a line segment connecting a planet and the sun sweeps out equal areas during equal intervals
of time. Lastly the third law which states that the time it takes for a planet to orbit the Sun increases
rapidly corresponding with the radius of the planets orbit. These laws came to help the

Strong Poison Analysis
In Strong Poison by Dorothy Sayers, there is a multitude of detectives. There is our main character,
the amateur detective Lord Peter Wimsey, and with him there are the people that work for and with
him. Miss Climpson, Bunter and Miss Murchison, these people are the ones that help him solve the
cases. The women that are helping Detective Wimsey are spinsters, who are equipped with a quick
mind and who have no problem sticking their noses where they have no business being. After World
War I there were a lot more spinsters on account of the young men being killed at war. I want to
make the argument that because of his time in the service Lord Peter Wimsey is a heroic detective,
unlike the detectives we have read about up to now.
Looking closely at both Lord Peter Wimsey and the spinster women that are helping him we can see
some of the unnoticable effects that the war had. With Lord Wimsey we can see the effects that
come from being in the war personally. While with the spinster women we get to see the effects that
the war has had back home and on those that were not actually in battle. Lord Peter Wimsey gives us
a noticeably different kind of detective because of this. He is different from the other detectives that
we have read about and talked about in class in that he is not emotionless. His time in battle has left
him with shell shock and anxiety, I think that this causes him to be less of a logical reasoning
detective.
The way that I understand the novel is that it was

Madison's Solution To A Strong Centralized Government
Although the Anti–Federalists, who wrote the Brutus essays, understood the importance of
amending the Articles of Confederation, they nonetheless opposed the ratification of the
Constitution. Moreover, the Anti–Federalist had three main concerns regarding the new proposed
Constitution. First, they were concerned about a strong centralized government, second, they
worried about the protection of people's individual rights and lastly, they were concerned about
getting equal representation before the general assembly. In response to the Anti–Federalists
concerns, Madison answered through Federalists number 10 that a strong centralized government
can be controlled through a large republic, because it would be divided into four separate branches,
thus making it difficult to factions to function. Furthermore, Madison addressed the second and third
concerns of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Moreover, Madison understood that factions might arise with the purpose of controlling the
government. For that reason, Madison's solution to a strong centralized government, was to attack
its causes and control the effects of factions. In order to accomplish this, Madison suggested a large
republic to control the effects a faction. Furthermore, Madison argued that in a large republic,
faction would not be successful because there would be too many factions to control the
government. Evidently, by having a large republic the evils of factions in a strong central
government can be controlled. In fact, Madison's argument is that a large republic can function
through delegating the government to a small number of citizens that would voice their constituents
desires. Lastly, Madison explains that the Constitution forms a combination of respect between the
federal government, state and local legislatures,allowing states their rights as

Determing the Enthalpy of Neutralization
Determining the enthalpy of neutralization by calorimetry
Anam Iqbal
Partner's name: Danielle Hodgson
TA's name: Karinna
Section # 003
Due date: November 24, 2009
Introduction
The purpose of the experiment is to determine the enthalpy of neutralization reactions by
calorimetry. Calorimetry, is the science of measuring the amount of heat. All calorimetric techniques
are therefore based on the measurement of heat that may be generated (exothermic process) or
consumed (endothermic process). The device used for measuring the heat changes in this
experiment is called calorimeter. A calorimeter is a Styrofoam cup is used as a calorimeter, because
it is a container with good insulated walls to prevent heat exchange with the environment.
A ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Of NaOH | Initial temp. Of HCL | Trial 1 | 24.5 | 24.0 | Trial 2 | 24.0 | 24.1 |
Table # 2: initial temperatures for neutralization of NaOH with HNO3 | NaOH | HNO3 | Trial 1 |
24.0 | 24.3 | Trial 2 | 24.1 | 24.0 |
Table #3: initial temperatures for neutralization of NaOH with Phenol | NaOH | Phenol | Trial 1 |
23.5 | 23.5 | Trial 2 | 23.9 | 23.9 |
Table #4: initial temperatures for neutralization of NaOH with unknown HCL | NaOH | Unknown
HCL | Trial 1 | 23.9 | 23.8 | Trial 2 | 23.7 | 22.8 |
Table #5: concentrations | HCL | NaOH | HNO# | Phenol | concentration | 1.9027 M | 2.3955M |
1.749M | 0.5000M |
Results and calculations
Part A: neutralization of NaOH with HCL
Table #1: temperature changes every 2 sec till max. | 2 sec | 4 sec | 6 sec | 8 sec | 10 sec | 12 sec | 14
sec | 16 sec | Trial 1 | 34.0 | 35.0 | 35.3 | 30.0 | 33.0 | | | | Trial 2 | 30.0 | 31.0 | 32.0 | 33.0 | 34.0 | | | |

Table #2: temperature changes for every 10 seconds for 1 min. | 0 sec | 10 sec | 20 sec | 30 sec | 40
sec | 50 sec | 60 sec | Trial 1 |

Alexander Hamilton 's A Strong Central Government
No. 12
In this paper Alexander Hamilton explains the need for a strong central government in order to
promote commerce. He claims that by introducing more precious metals, workers such as farmers,
merchants, mechanics, and manufacturers will all be enticed to work harder in order to achieve the
wealth needed to acquire these "rewards". It would be their gratification for their hard–work.
Hamilton also states that commerce will never replace agriculture for their interest are intimately
blended and interwoven. The most commerce can do is augment agriculture which is good for both
parties, and ultimately the nation. Mr. Hamilton believes that a strong central government that
utilizes its land is also needed for a nation to function. In ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Since the principle part of US trade is done on the Atlantic coast, we would only have to defend one
main border. He concludes by stating that if the US continues to weaken its government, it wouldn't
be a safe or respectable nation.
No. 21
In this paper Alexander Hamilton discusses two main issues. The first issue discussed by Hamilton
is the US government's inabilities to enforce any written laws, meaning while to government can
create these laws there is nothing that can force ant state to follow them. Hamilton states that if
Massachusetts chooses to elect a monarch it could violently overthrow the governments of Rhode
Island, New Hampshire, or New York. The next issue discussed by Hamilton is the illogical decision
to provide states with quotas. He claims that the idea of providing a state with a quota is as
ridiculous as comparing the wealth of France to Britain. You cannot treat countries, or states, of
differing sizes as if they are the same. He elaborates further by comparing two counties in New York
State, King's County and Montgomery. Their differing size makes it impossible for them reach the
same quota. The same principle that states that the wealth of nations it too difficult to measure due
to the size, climate, soil, intelligence/ of its citizens, etc.; is the same for the states in the union of the
United States of America. He concludes by making the point that there are better ways to increase

Did The Constitution Create A Strong Government Essay
The subject of how did the constitution create a strong government while limiting itspower and still
protect the rights of the people has been covered intensively by the world pressover the past decade.
In depth analysis of how did the constitution create a strong governmentwhile limiting its power and
still protect the rights of the people can be an enriching experience.Until recently considered taboo
amongst polite society, how did the constitution create astrong government while limiting its power
and still protect the rights of the people is featuringmore and more in the ideals of the young and
upwardly mobile. Inevitably feelings run deepamongst the upper echelons of progressive service
sector organizations, whom I can say nomore about due to the legal restrictions. Complex though it
is I shall now attempt to provide anexhaustive report on how did the constitution create a strong
government while limiting itspower and still protect the rights of the people and its numerous
industries.The constitution created a strong national government specifically in many ways. ... Show
This helped createa strong national government because anyone elected or appointed has to take a
oath touphold / defend/ take care of the constitution. Judges of every state is forced to obey it.
Theconstitution is the supreme law of the land. This helps give no one a chance to be above
oneanother. Also, all elected and appointed officials in government in state and federal have
touphold the oaths and constitution one required. This helps to uphold a equal government/society.
Finally, the constitution gave the new federal governments increased powers thatallowed it to
effectively govern the entire nation by adding things to help the society. Examplesare military,
raising taxes, and coining money. The legislative branch create laws that

How Did Rome Have A Strong Central Government
A strong central government sets a foundation for how a civilization is supposed to run. Rules,
values, and order are all contributors to a community's governmental structure to make it run
smoothly. These factors allow the people and government officials to sustain and avoid falling apart.
The main reason that civilizations collapse is because of the failure to maintain a government,
without corruption, which usually leads to poor decision–making based on the leaders self interests.
One civilization that had first hand knowledge of what a weak central government looked like was
Ancient Macadonia. Alexander the Great was a very strong leader and a fierce warrior. He was
known for conquering many civilizations and leading his army to many victories. When he died, his
family (who did not have good relations) took over Macadonia. They split the civilization into four
separate areas and one family member and a general would rule each sector. The four ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rome's Senate basically had no control over the behavior of their citizens towards the end of their
civilization which lead to their leaders being assassinated every 3–4 years, Along with that, the
romans had a polytheistic belief system until Christianity made its way to Europe. Rome then took
in this religion which juristically changed their way of life. This weakened the system that they had
built up for many years by shifting focus away from the glory of their state. Their old polytheistic
views also fit in with their government system and when that was dropped, there was a lot of
conflict between the people and the roman government. This conflict made many negative impacts
on Rome like weakening Rome's (once strong) military and causing tension between Rome's
government and their people, concluding that without a strong central government, a society is not
able to run correctly. This happened to Rome and lead to the collapse of their

Pros And Cons Of Having A Strong Central Government
In the 19th century American's were overjoyed when they gain their independence from Great
Britain in 1776 and soon established a government under The Articles of Confederation. However,
The Articles of Confederation were unstable and provided America with a weak central government,
because of the lack authority needed to sustain a nation. Yet, many Americans opposed the idea of
having a strong central government, because they feared America would shift into a dictatorship.
While others felt that a strong government would sufficiently help the nation run as one. "The
constitution of 1787 created a "federal' system of dispersed and divided authority– authority divided
between national and state governments, authority divided among executive,

Classification Of Poisons And Its Effects On The Nervous...
AMITY INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC SCIENCES AMITY UNIVERSITY UTTAR PRADESH
Name: – Sanchari Dasgupta Enrolment No.: – A5905914014 Programme: – B.Sc (Hons) Forensic
science Batch: – 2014–17 Title of summer assignment: – Classification of poisons Goal for the first
week: – Introduction of the topic Goal for the second week: – Write in brief about corrosive poisons
and non–metallic irritant poison Goal for the third week: – Write in brief about metallic irritant
poisons Goal for the fourth week: – Write about poisons having vegetable and animal origin Goal
for the fifth week: – Write about poisons acting on the nervous system FIRST WEEK'S WORK
POISONS INTRODUCTION Poisons are substances those are most likely to cause harm to a
person. It can also be defined as a substance which has the potent of causing illness or death of a
living organism when introduced to the body or absorbed. It has a tendency to cause physical or
chemical mutations in the body which may be curable or incurable depending on the type of poison
used. It causes harm by physical or chemical changes in the human body. Poisons with high level of
toxicity may be dangerous on consuming once and can also be life threatening. Few poisons which
are less toxic are often used as slow poisons. Absolutely anything could be a poison, because
everything is good but nothing in excess is. Poisons are those substances

How Does Jefferson Form A Strong Central Government
Yes, I think Thomas Jefferson wanted to see America form a strong central government because
even though he was in France, he still went out of his way to write to people about the things going
on in America, for example, Shays Rebellion. So, he must have cared about America and wanted it
to have a strong central government. According to Jefferson, the colonies had been chaotic. He
wrote, "The British have so long hired their newspapers to repeat every form of lies about our being
in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, and we have beloved them ourselves"
(Jefferson). So, the colonies had been chaotic. I think that Jefferson worries that his new form of
government might fail, so he tells people they are overreacting about the rebellion so they would
stop fighting. Jefferson writes, "Our Constitutional Convention has [made too much of Shay's
rebellion]: and in the spur of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
So, I think that Jefferson worries that his new form of government might fail. When Jefferson says,
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants"
(Jefferson) he means that sometimes a war is necessary and in their case, Shay's rebellion is
necessary. This document challenges the information in the textbook because in the letter it talks
about how they are overreacting and they don't need to start a rebellion and in the textbook it talks
about how the farmers needed to rebel against them. For example, in the textbook it states, "As the
recession grew worse, many found it impossible to pay their taxes as well as their mortgages and
other debts. Those who could not pay often faced the loss of their farms"(The American

How Did The Articles Of Confederation A Strong Form Of...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Amber Moore

More from Amber Moore (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

How Did The Articles Of Confederation A Strong Form Of...