F2 sat workshop f2s summit jan2015

1. Research,
Evaluation,
&
Visioning
Claire
Berezowitz,
University
of
Wisconsin-­‐Madison
Andrea
Bontrager
Yoder,
University
of
Wisconsin-­‐Madison
Beth
Hanna,
Community
GroundWorks
Wisconsin
Farm
to
School
Summit
Thursday,
January
29,
2015
Wisconsin
Rapids,
WI

2. Who
is
here
today?

3. JEOPARDY
GAME!
jeopardylabs.com/play/wisconsin-­‐farm-­‐to-­‐school

4. FARM
TO
SCHOOL
ACTIVITY
TRACKER

5. Project
History

6. Why
track
program
activity?
• Common
language
• Common
quanOficaOon
• Compare
between
schools
• Track
development
within
school
across
Ome

7. What
is
“Comprehensive”
F2S?
• Describe
tool:
• Four
domains:
• Variety
• Frequency
• Minutes
Engagement
acOviOes
School
gardens
NutriOon,
agriculture
educaOon
Local
foods
in
school
meals

8. FARM
TO
SCHOOL
ACTIVITY
TRACKER
Audience
parOcipaOon!

9. Does
it
work?
• Monthly
acOvity
reports,
2010-­‐2011
• Enter
into
AcOvity
Tracker
• Program
managers
score
(1-­‐10)
each
site
• Correlate
domain
scores
with
expert
scores
• Three
months
of
acOvity
data,
Fall
2013
• 5
raters
enter
into
AcOvity
Tracker
–
assess
for
inter-­‐rater
reliability
according
to:
• Same
entries?
• Same
domain-­‐level
scores?

10. Domain
Scores
correlate
with
Expert
Scores
Predictor
Spearman
Rank
Correla=on
Coefficient
(r)
Procurement:
Variety
0.63***
Procurement:
Frequency
0.71***
Classroom:
Number
of
lessons
0.45**
Classroom:
Number
of
minutes
0.23
Engagement:
Number
of
ac=vi=es
0.71***
Garden:
Number
of
visits
0.42**
Garden:
Number
of
minutes
data
not
collected
***
p<.0001
**
p<.001
*
p<.05

11. BeneTits
of
tracking
F2S
activity
• Common
language
• Common
quanOficaOon
• Compare
between
schools
• Track
development
within
school
across
Ome

12. EVALUATION
FRAMEWORK
ACTIVITY
Let’s
move
around!

13. Wrap
up
• QuesOons/comments?
• How
can
we
move
F2S
evaluaOon
prioriOes
forward
in
Wisconsin?
• Other
evaluaOon
tools:
• See
Wisconsin
F2S
Toolkit:
hip://www.cias.wisc.edu/toolkits/

14. Contact
information
• Claire
Berezowitz
• ckberezowitz@wisc.edu
• Andrea
Bontrager
Yoder
• ayoder@wisc.edu,
abontrageryoder@gmail.com
• Beth
Hanna
• beth@communitygroundworks.org

16. Student
Outcomes
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
1
≥2
%
of
Trays
Percent
of
Trays
with
no
FV
disappearance
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
1
≥2
%
of
Trays
Percent
of
Trays
with
no
FV
items
Fall
2010
May
2011
***
***
***
***
*

17. 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Percent
of
trays
with
no
FV
items,
2010-­‐2011
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Percent
of
trays
with
no
FV
consumed,
2010-­‐2011
Fall
2010
Spring
2011

18. Domain
Scores
correlate
with
Student
Outcomes
***
p<.0001
**
p<.001
*
p<.05
• Correlates
with
improvements
in
Knowledge
scores:
• School
Meals:
Source,
Frequency
• Correlates
with
improvements
in
percent
of
students
with
no
FV
consumed:
• School
Meals:
Source,
Variety
• Classroom
Educa<on:
Number
of
lessons
• Engagement
Ac<vi<es:
Number
of
ac<vi<es
• Garden
Ac<vi<es:
Number
of
ac<vi<es