2. Pro-mest 1988 - 1994
• Demonstration facility 0.1 million m3/a (10 million €)
• Full scale facility 0.6 million m3/a (45 million €)
• Farmers organisations feared legislation to reduce
the number of swines
3. Promest bankrupt in 1994
• Technical problems
• Plant never reached full capacity
• Farmers had lower cost options for disposal of
swine manure
26. Conclusions
• Mono-digestion of swine manure is only economic with a
gate fee and simplified clean-up of thin fraction of effluent.
• Pelletising of dried effluent was not successful
• Sequential batch reactor need to be demonstrated at pilot
plant scale
• Simplified induced blanket reactor need to be tested with
swine manure.
• Anaerobic digestion of combinations of manures is
economic with the addition of iron compounds
27. Literature
W.J. Oosterkamp 2017 “Progress in anaerobic digestion of manures”
submitted for publication in Majid Hosseini ed. “Handbook of
Biotechnology for Renewable Fuels, elsevier New York USA
W.J. Oosterkamp 2016 “Chicken manure digestion” accepted for publication in
Current Biochemical Engineering