Turun kauppakamarin liikennepäivä 2014 - Kari-Pekka Laaksonen

1. We take care
SECA Challenge -
Containerships
TURKU
19.11.2014/kpl

2. We take care
SECA is the area in which
environmental regulations
set by IMO will come into
force on the 1st of January
2015
• Vessel operators must
find an energy source
that contains not more
than 0,1% Sulphur
against 1% currently
ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGE

3. We take care
Marine Gas Oil
(MGO)
Designed for use in all
diesel-fuelled engines
Alternative
fuels
(methanol, biofuels)
Available solutions
Scrubber with
Heavy Fuel Oil
(HFO)

4. We take care
Source: Gasum
Share of different vessel fuels
in Baltics 2015 
Sail
Steam
Oil
Gas

5. We take care
+ –
• Utilize next
generation fuels
• Normal diesel oil
• 95–98 % of the
vessel operators
are expected to use
this technology in
2015
• ‘Wash’ SOx
emissions from
exhaust gases
• Use LNG
as a fuel
• Implementation cost: 3–4 M€ / vessel
• Can not be fitted on all of the vessels
• Limited market capability to install a
sufficient number of scrubbers
• Running cost are 50% more
expensive than HFO
• In order to keep the costs down,
slow steaming is needed:
• HBG/RTM – St. Petersburg:
plus one day
• The LNG supply infrastructure exists
only in Rotterdam, but is building up in
the North and Baltic Sea
• LNG-engines and tanks are more
expensive than traditional vessel
engines & HFO tanks
• Can be installed, but
on specific vessels
only
• Environmentally friendly
• Benefit from possible future
emission trading (CO2)
• Tackling also future
legislation needs: PM, Noᵪ
• A market price is already
existing for natural gas
• No major
modifications to the
vessels are needed
Heavy Fuel
Oil Scrubber
(HFO)
Marine
Gas Oil
(MGO)
Alternative
fuels
• ‘Clean’ from an
ecological perspective
• Large-scale technology is
not yet in place
• Uncertainty about its
availability
Most companies are choosing MGO or HFO
with scrubber

6. We take care
2-phased solution
Target is to renew fleet by having a combination of LNG–fuelled vessels and scrubber
equipped vessels
Plan for the fleet in 2015 - 2016:
• Vessel 1 scrubber in 2015
• Vessels 2 and 3 scrubber in 2015
• Vessels 4 and 5 scrubber in 2015
• Vessels 6 – 7 LNG equipped in 2016
• Vessels 8 - 9 LNG equipped in 2017
• Vessels 10 – 11 LNG equipped in 2018
2015: Half of the fleet equipped with scubber
2016: Starting to renew the fleet with LNG vessels

7. We take care
+ –
• Utilize next
generation fuels
• Normal diesel oil
• 95–98 % of the
vessel operators
are expected to use
this technology in
2015
• ‘Wash’ SOx
emissions from
exhaust gases
• Use LNG
as a fuel
• Implementation cost: 3–4 M€ / vessel
• Can not be fitted on all of the vessels
• Limited market capability to install a
sufficient number of scrubbers
• Running cost are 50% more
expensive than HFO
• In order to keep the costs down,
slow steaming is needed:
• HBG/RTM – St. Petersburg:
plus one day
• The LNG supply infrastructure exists
only in Rotterdam, but is building up in
the North and Baltic Sea
• LNG-engines and tanks are more
expensive than traditional vessel
engines & HFO tanks
• Can be installed, but
on specific vessels
only
• Environmentally friendly
• Benefit from possible future
emission trading (CO2)
• Tackling also future
legislation needs: PM, Noᵪ
• A market price is already
existing for natural gas
• No major
modifications to the
vessels are needed
Heavy Fuel
Oil Scrubber
(HFO)
Marine
Gas Oil
(MGO)
Alternative
fuels
• ‘Clean’ from an
ecological perspective
• Large-scale technology is
not yet in place
• Uncertainty about its
availability
Containerships approach 2016 

8. We take care
• Lighter than air (when in gas form)
• Easy to storage and transport
• Only 1/600 of volume of “pipe gas”
WITH LNG
REDUCING EMISSION

9. We take care
TRUCK FLEET
POWERED
• In Finland, Russia and the UK
• Own refueling station
• Pilot phase in process since
Q1/2014

10. We take care
Environmental comparison
Emissions for 33 euro pallets from BE-Brussels to RU-Moscow
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
Methane (CH4)
Nitrous oxide (N2O)
Total Contribution to Global Warming (kg)
Emissions per journey
Greenhouse gases
Multimodal:
technology vessel
Road
2 886,00
0,11
25,79
2 911,90
1 133,57
55,81
9,60
1 198,98
Saving on Contribution to Global Warming 59%
Assumptions in above calculation:
ROAD Multimodal LNG Road – Sea – Road (45’ cnt)
Using EURO 5 truck LNG vessel with 800 TEU load
Brussels to Moscow direct Fuel: LNG with 16% less consumption than HFO
- Dual-Fuel engine vessel will burn 99% of LNG and 1% of MGO
2.600 KM road Using EURO 5 truck
Brussels to Ghent 58 km
Ghent to St. Petersburg 1.200 n. miles
St. Petersburg to Moscow 700 km

11. We take care
Long-term solution
LNG as a main fuel for whole end-
to-end service
• Target to operate 8 to 10 LNG vessels (Sea)
• LNG powered trucks
• To improve the vessels’ efficiency in order
to maintain competitiveness
• To exceed all known future environmental
regulations

12. We take care
THANK YOU