GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 3)Defense Mechanism of the body
Conversation group 2
1. Relation of Energy Intake And Nutrients Macro
With Nutrition More Genesis On Students Class X
And XI at Senior High School 5 Padang in 2015
Group 2
Loly Novita Winas 1611226004
Fitrah Ilahi 1611226011
Sutia Dwi Purnasari 1611226018
Yolanda Putrie Kifli 1611226027
3. • Health Research, age 15 y.o
• Public Health Service Padang : SMA N 5 Padang
Nutrition More prevalence
4. B. Formulation Of
The Problem
What the Relation intake of energy, carbohydrates,
protein and fat with Nutrition More Case on
students class X and XI in the Senior Hight School 5
Padang in 2015.
C. Research
Objectives a. General purpose
To know the relations of the intake energy and
nutrients macro with overwight case on students
class X and XI in the Senior High School 5 Padang
b. Special Purpose
to Know distribution of students based on
the intake of energy, carbohydrates, proteins and
fats. To know the relations of energy intake,
carbohydrates, protein and fat with overweight
case of students.
5. D. Benefits Of
Research
• for Recearcher
Increase knowledge and insight as well as
apply the knowledge
• for schools
Provide input to the principal about the
nutritional status of their students as well
as repair steps that need to be done
• for the community
Provide information to the public about
the intake of energy and the effect of
nutrition more
6. Chapter II
• Understanding Youth
• Nutrition In Teens
• Genesis Nutrition More
• Intake of Energy and Nutrient Substance Macro
(Carbohydrates, Proteins, Fats)
• Theoretical framework
• Conceptual framework
• DO
• hypothesis
8. There is a relationship of energy intake and
nutritional status of students SMA N 5 Padang.
There is a relationship carbohydrate intake and
nutritional status of students SMA N 5 Padang.
There is a relationship of protein intake and
nutritional status of students SMA N 5 Padang.
There is a relationship of fat intake and nutritional
status of students SMA N 5 Padang.
Hypothesis
9. Cross
sectional
design
A.Research
Design
5 Senior
High
School
Padang in
January
2015 until
June 2015.
B.Location
And Time
Research
1. Population
Were all students of
class X and XI
amounting to 576
people
2. Sample
The total sample of
75 students, plus
10% as a reserve
sample and obtained
a sample of 83
people. Sampling
was done by simple
random sampling
method.
C.Population
and Sample
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODS
10. D. Data Collection Techniques
1. Primary Data
Primary data are taken
include nutritional status
and energy and nutrient
intake of macro
(Carbohydrate, Protein,
Fat).
2. Secondary Data
Secondary data is data
which includes the
general state of the
research sites
12. F. Data Analysis
1. Univariate Analysis
percentage frequency distribution of
independent and dependent variables
2. The Bivariate Analysis
look at the corelation between
energy intake and macro nutrients
are carbohydrates, proteins, and fats
and nutritional status
13. An
overview
of the site
Senior high school 5
Padang is located in
New Hall, the village of
Mount Sarik, Kuranji
Subdistrict Padang
The number of
teachers in high
school 5 Padang
as much as 93
people
The number of students in
high school 5 Padang as a
whole that is as much as
919 people and consists of
28 class
Chapter IV
14. Table 2
The distribution of Students based on Gender in high
school 5 Padang by 2015
An overview of the sample
Gender n %
Male 39 52
Women 36 48
The total 75 100
15. 1. Genesis nutrition more
Table 3
Frequency distribution of students based on Genesis Nutrition
More in high school 5 Padang by 2015
Univariate analysis
Category n %
Emaciated 0 0
Commond 48 64
Overweight 25 33.3
Obesity 2 2.7
The Total 75 100
16. 2. Energy intake
Table 4
Frequency distribution of students based on Energy Intake in high school 5
Padang by 2015
3. Carbohydrate intake
Table 5
Frequency distribution of students based on their intake of Carbohydrates in
high school 5 Padang by 2015
Energy intake n %
A more 23 30.7
Sufficiently 52 69.3
The Total 75 100
Carbohydrate intake n %
A more 35 46.7
Sufficiently 40 53.3
The Total 75 100
17. 4. Protein intake
Table 6
Frequency Distribution Of Students Based On Protein Intake in high
school 5 Padang by 2015
5. Fat intake
Table 7
Frequency distribution of students based on fat intake in high school 5
Padang by 2015
Protein intake n %
A more 61 81.3
Sufficiently 14 18.7
The Total 75 100
Fat intake n %
A more 21 28.0
Sufficiently 54 72.0
The Total 75 100
18. 1. Relationship of energy Intake with Genesis Nutrition More
2. Carbohydrate Intake relationship with Genesis Nutrition More
Bivariat analysis
Energy
intake
Genesis nutrition more
Total p value
More nutrition Commond
n % n % n % 0.000
A more 23 100 0 0 23 100
Sufficiently 4 7.7 48 92.3 52 100
Total 27 36 50 64 75 100
Carbohydrate
intake
Genesis nutrition more
Total p value
More nutrition Commond
n % n % n % 0.001
A more 20 57.1 15 42.9 35 100
Sufficiently 7 17.5 33 82.5 40 100
Total 27 36 48 64 75 100
19. 3. Relationship of Protein intake with Genesis Nutrition More
4. Relationship of fat intake with Genesis Nutrition More
Protein
intake
Genesis nutrition more
Total p value
More nutrition Commond
n % n % n % 0.02
A more 26 42.6 35 57.4 61 100
Sufficiently 1 7.1 13 92.9 14 100
Total 27 36 48 64 75 100
Fat intake
Genesis nutrition more
Total p value
More nutrition Commond
n % n % n % 0.000
A more 21 100 0 0 21 100
Sufficiently 6 11.1 48 88.9 54 100
Total 27 36 48 64 75 100
20. Chapter 5
• A third (33.3%) of students experiencing more nutrition.
• Almost a third (30,7%) students have more energy intake.
• Nearly half (46,7%) students have more carbohydrate intake
• As much as (81,3%) students have more protein intake.
• More than a quarter (28%) students have more fat intake.
• There is a meaningful relationship between energy intake with
Genesis nutrition more with p value = 0.000.
• There is a meaningful relationship between the intake of
carbohydrates with Genesis nutrition more with p value = 0.001.
• There is a meaningful relationship between the intake of protein with
Genesis nutrition more with p value = 0.02
• There is a meaningful relationship between the intake of fat by
Genesis nutrition more with p value = 0.000
conclusion
