This document provides guidelines for writing a research report in social science. It outlines the typical components of a research report which include a title page, abstract, introduction, literature review, method section, results section, discussion section, and appendices. It describes the purpose and content that should be included in each section, such as problem statement, hypotheses, participants, tools, data collection/analysis procedures, findings, conclusions, implications, and limitations. The document emphasizes writing concisely, logically organizing content, and communicating research in a clear and impartial manner.
1. Report Writing in Social Science Research
Sudarshan Mishra, Ph.D.
Ravenshaw University
Cuttack
Email:
2. Sources
Ary, D. Jacobs, L.C. and Sorensen, C.K. (2010). Introduction to
Research in Education. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning
Creswell, J. W.(2012). Educational research : planning, conducting,
and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Delhi: Pearson.
American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the
American Psychological Association. — 6th ed. Washington, DC: Author.
Gay, L.R. Mills. G.E. and Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research :
competencies for analysis and applications. Delhi: Pearson.
3. Web Sources
University of Houston
https://libraries.uh.edu/find/theses/
University of Massachusetts Amherst
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/
George Fox University
https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/
4. Outline
What is a Research Report?
Purpose of Research Report?
Types of Research Report
Guidelines for writing Research Report
Ethical consideration
Components of a Research Report
Preliminary Pages
Main Body of the Report (Introduction, Review of
related literature, Method, Results and Discussion)
Appendices
5. What is a Research
Report?
A well-written report
describing a study in
enough detail
6. What is a Research
Report?
Describes what you
did, how you did,
what you found, and
how your study is
related to the body of
knowledge in your
area
15. Guidelines for
writing Research
Report
arranged in such a way that
readers know exactly where
to find those specific parts
they may be seeking.
Otherwise, time is lost in
seeking relevant information.
16. Guidelines for
writing Research
Report
keep the tone impersonal.
first-person pronouns are never
used in quantitative reports,
although they are acceptable in
qualitative reports
17. Guidelines for writing
Research Report
Spell out a number that comes
at the start of a sentence (e.g.,
Six hundred schools were
contacted).
Use words if the number is nine
or less (e.g., a total of five
lists………)
18. Guidelines for writing
Research Report
Anecdotes, stories of personal
experiences, and argumentative
discourse are out of place in a
quantitative report.
25. Title/Cover Page
Title
should summarize the main idea of
the manuscript
should identify the variables or
theoretical issues under
investigation and their relationship
26. Title/Cover Page
Title
Avoid emotion-laden/ humorous/
journalistic titles (incredible,
amazing, effortless, fantastic, etc.)
Avoid interrogative words (like
how, what, when, or why)
This merely distract from the
seriousness and authority of your
research
27. Title/Cover Page
Title
Avoid words that serve no
useful purpose (A Study of/ An
Investigation of/ An
Experimental Investigation of/
A comparison of, etc.
29. Abstract
brief, comprehensive summary of
the contents
the problem under investigation
the participants
study method
main findings
conclusions and the implications
30. Main Body of the Report
Introduction (Chapter One)
Review of related literature (Chapter Two)
The Method (Chapter Three)
Results (Chapter Four)
Discussion ((Chapter Five)
31. Introduction
Theoretical Framework of the Study
Rationale of the Study
Statement of the Problem
Research Questions/ Objectives
Hypotheses of the Study
Operational Definitions
Scope and Delimitations
32. Rationale of the Study
Justifies the study with sufficient
theoretical base and research gap
Should not be justified with personal
experience
33. Statement of the Problem
brief but formal statement
of the purpose of the
research
indicates the variables
examined in the study
34. Statement of the Problem
Internship is an indispensable part of any pre-service teacher
education programme. It gives practical real-life exposure for
professional preparation of prospective teachers. It provides an
opportunity to develop true understanding of the teaching profession.
Two-Year B.Ed. Programme of Regional Institute of Education,
Bhubaneswar is a model pre-service teacher education programme
throughout the eastern region. Its internship programme is very
systematic and rigorous. The investigator is keen to study about the
various processes involved during internship of a particular teacher
education institution i.e., Regional Institute of Education,
Bhubaneswar. The result of the study may not be generalized.
However, the study will give an insight about the various process of
internship in depth.
35. Statement of the Problem
Continuous and comprehensive evaluation (CCE) scheme has already
been implemented in schools in Odisha. However, whether the real
aim of CCE is achieved or not needs to be studied. In this context, it is
essential to appraise the present practice of CCE at elementary school
level in Odisha. Continuous evaluation will be studied in terms of
regularity in assessment of the progress and comprehensiveness will
be studied by evaluation of curricular areas, other curricular areas and
personal social qualities of the children. To substantiate the study, as
children, parents and teachers are major stakeholders of elementary
education, it will examine the level of awareness of teachers and
parents about CCE. The study will also investigate the perception of
different stakeholders such as, students, teachers and parents.
36. Review of related literature
indicates what is known about the
problem
to educate the reader about the area
under study
not a series of abstracts but rather a
summary and analysis of the relations
and differences among relevant studies
and reports.
37. Review of related literature
The review should conclude with a brief
summary of the literature and its implications
Gives a cumulative understanding of the
field.
Assume that the reader is knowledgeable
about the basic problem and does not require
a complete accounting of its history.
38. Review of related literature
When summarizing, avoid non-essential
details; emphasize pertinent findings, relevant
methodological issues, and major conclusions.
Demonstrate the logical continuity between
previous and present work.
40. Results
summarize the collected data
and the analysis performed on
those data
Report the data in sufficient
detail to justify conclusions.
41. Results
Mention all relevant results, including those
that run counter to expectation;
Do not hide uncomfortable results by omission.
Do not include individual scores or raw data,
with the exception, for example, case study
Accurate, unbiased, complete, and insightful
reporting
42. Discussion
Major Findings and Conclusion
Discussion
Implications
Suggestions for Further Research
Limitations of the Study
43. Discussion
Evaluate and interpret the result with respect to your
original hypotheses
critically analyse the findings and develop an argument
that supports your recommendations
Similarities and differences between your results and
the work of others should be used to contextualize,
confirm, and clarify conclusions.
44. Appendices
Provide information and data that are pertinent to the
study but are either too lengthy or not important enough
to be included in the main body of the report.
Commonly contain materials especially developed for the
study (e.g., tests, questionnaires, cover letters, raw data,
data analysis sheets, etc.)