A layperson’s introduction to federal procurement
requirements under 2 CFR Part 200 and straightforward
guidance on achieving successful and
compliant procurements. This presentation will
offer practical step by step guidance on how
to perform procurement of typical goods and
services using federal funding and is designed
to be easily understood by laypeople and nontechnical
government employees.
download here https://cohnreznick.sharefile.com/d-s51dd213ace4405da
7. F e d e r a l G r a n t s
Federal Grants
• Exist to fund public services &
stimulate the economy of the
United States.
Scarcity
•Limited grant dollars.
•Heightened responsibility to
allocate grant dollars efficiently.
Government Investment
• Aim to save money in long
run.
• Maintain economic, health, &
social standards.
6May 20, 2017
8. P u b l i c E x p e n d i t u r e R i s k s
Waste, fraud &
abuse
Inefficient
programmatic
results
7May 20, 2017
10. R u l e m a k i n g C o n s i d e r a t i o n s
Federal
procurement
regulations
Promote
public
policies
Mitigate
risks
Behavioral
economics
9May 20, 2017
11. C o s t - R e l a t e d P r i n c i p l e s
Good value
to taxpayer
Prices are
competitive
Honest and
Fair
Free and
open
competition
Obtain goods & services as effectively and economically as possible.
12. C o s t - R e l a t e d P r i n c i p l e s
11May 20, 2017
Protect
taxpayer
funds
Contain
costs
13. N o n C o s t - R e l a t e d P r i n c i p l e s
12May 20, 2017
Promote
socioeconomic
policies
15. S o c i o e c o n o m i c I m p l i c a t i o n s
• Disasters affect
local businesses
Recognize Need
• Local business
benefit from
working on FEMA
funded projects
Leverage Federal
Funding • Regulations require
free and open
competition.
• “Level playing
field”
Promote Free and
Open Competition
14May 20, 2017
16. P r o m o t i n g S o c i o e c o n o m i c P o l i c i e s
Do’s
• Provide full & open competition
• Add qualified small & MBE/WBE
to solicitation lists.
• When feasible, divide projects
into separate procurements so
that smaller business can
compete for the award.
Don’ts
• Award contracts to contractors
that developed bids/bid
specifications on your behalf.
• Include unnecessary
experience/bonding
• Specify in-State or local
geographical preferences
May 20, 2017 15
17. G o l d e n R u l e s
Maintain compliance with federal procurement standards to ensure your
procurements are eligible for federal grant funding.
16May 20, 2017
18. G o l d e n R u l e s
17May 20, 2017
Maintain detailed records of procurement actions.
20. R e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s
FEMA
Responsible for
enforcing
compliance with
procurement
standards
Texas
Responsible for
ensuring
compliance w/
procurement
requirements
Subrecipient
Must conform to
Federal law and
the procurement
standards
19May 20, 2017
21. P r o c u r e m e n t R e q u i r e m e n t s
Grants awarded prior to
December 2014
Grants awarded after
December 2014
44 CFR Part 13 (state,
local governments,
Indian tribal
governments)
2 CFR Part 215 (institutions
of higher educations,
hospitals, PNPs)
2 C.F.R. pt. 200
Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal
Awards
22. R u l e s & R e g u l a t i o n s
In accepting Public Assistance subgrants, subrecipients agree to
maintain compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 and 44 CFR Part 206.
2 CFR 200
Uniform Administrative Requirements
Cost Principles
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.
44 CFR Part 206
Regulations specific to FEMA Public
Assistance funding and eligibility criteria.
23. 2 C F R PA R T 2 0 0
Uniform Administrative
Requirements
• Government-wide grants
management policies and
guidelines.
• Determines how grants are
awarded, managed,
audited, and closed-out
• Helps reduce the risk of
fraud, waste, & abuse.
Cost Principles
• Establishes guidance on
what costs are allowable,
reasonable, and
allocable.
• Accounting practices must
be consistent with these
cost principles.
• Must provide adequate
documentation to support
costs charged to the
Federal award.
Audit Requirements
• Establishes thresholds
and requirements for
Single Audits.
• Establishes the basis for
determining Federal
award amounts
expended.
• Establishes requirements
for auditees and oversight
agencies.
24. Te r m i n o l o g y
Allowable
• Necessary and
reasonable for
performance
of Project
Worksheet
Reasonable
• Does not
exceed what a
prudent person
would pay
under same
circumstances
Allocable
• Goods or
services are
assignable or
chargeable to
a Project
Worksheet
23May 20, 2017
25. C o m m o n l y C i t e d
Topic Regulation Link
Purpose of 2 CFR 2 CFR 200.100 Click here
Suspension and
debarment
2 CFR 200.213 Click here
Financial management 2 CFR 200.302 Click here
General procurement
standards
2 CFR 200.318 Click here
Methods of procurement
to be followed
2 CFR 200.320 Click here
Contract cost and price 2 CFR 200.323 Click here
Direct costs 2 CFR 200.413 Click here
Cost Principles 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E Click here
26. P r o c u r e m e n t R e g u l a t i o n s
Click here for link to
2 CFR 200 Procurement
regulations.
• Local governments
• PNPs
• Hospitals
• Educational
institutions
27. G e n e r a l R e q u i r e m e n t s
Subrecipients must comply with the
procurement requirements
enacted by Federal law, executive
orders, Federal regulations, and
terms of the grant award.
• Federal requirements will control
over state & local rules for
contracting.
28. N o n c o m p l i a n c e
Noncompliance with these statutes, EOs, regulations, and policies, may
result in:
2 CFR 200.338 – REMEDIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE
Temporarily withheld cash payments
Denied use of funds for the cost of the activity not in
compliance
Suspended or terminated Federal award
Initiating suspension or debarment proceedings
Withholding further Federal awards for the project
29. U s e o f
E n f o r c e m e n t
P o w e r
“Enforcement remedies are the vehicle
to ensure protection for all taxpayers
and Federal missions are
accomplished within the programs’
rules and regulations.”With regards to
minimizing taxpayer
costs, the Department of
Homeland Security,
Office of the Inspector
General says:
28May 20, 2017
31. P r o c u r e m e n t P r o c e s s
Subrecipient
procurement
process
Identify
needs
Cost Analysis
Determine
procurement
method
Create &
publicize
solicitation
Receive
proposals
Evaluate
proposals
Award
contract
Oversee
contract
work
Verify work &
issue
payment
32. A c c e p t a b l e P r o c u r e m e n t M e t h o d s
Procurement Method When to use
Micro-Purchase • Supplies/services < $3,500.00
Small Purchase • Aggregate dollar amount of
service < $150,000.00.
Sealed Bids • Preferred method for procuring
construction services.
Competitive Proposals (RFQ/RFP) • Architectural/Engineering
• Can’t award contract exclusively
on price due to the nature of the
service.
Noncompetitive Proposals • Supply/service only available
from one source
33. M i c r o P u r c h a s e
1. Appropriate when purchasing commodity/services under $3,500.00 (Micro-
Purchase threshold.
2. Subrecipients are not required to solicit competitive quotations.
3. Document determination that the price is fair and reasonable.
4. Example: Purchase $1000.00 of concrete mix for a temporary sidewalk
repair.
32May 20, 2017
34. F a i r & R e a s o n a b l e
Lowes
Home
Depot
Ace
Hardware
33May 20, 2017
35. S m a l l P u r c h a s e
1. Appropriate for routine commercial, fixed price purchase orders.
2. May not be used for purchases over $150,000.00.
3. Must obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified
sources (3 bid minimum).
4. Must document the procurement history.
5. Should include a cost estimate that shows the total estimated cost to fall
below the $150,000.00 simplified acquisition threshold.
34May 20, 2017
36. S m a l l P u r c h a s e
Project Owner: Needs lawn mowing services.
Vendor Date
Contacted
Service requested MBE/WBE Licensed Willi
ng/
Able
Quote Quote
Expires
Kent 5/15/2017 Bi-weekly mowing service
@CohnReznick HQ (.6 Acre)
N Y Y $35 12/1/2017
Roman 5/15/2017 Bi-weekly mowing service
@CohnReznick HQ (.6 Acre)
Y N N $40 12/1/2017
Alisha 5/15/2017 Bi-weekly mowing service
@CohnReznick HQ (.6 Acre)
Y Y Y $25 12/1/2017
Buzzy 5/15/2017 Bi-weekly mowing service
@CohnReznick HQ (.6 Acre)
N Y Y $49.99 12/1/2017
May 20, 2017 35
37. C o m p e t i t i v e P r o p o s a l s
1. Appropriate when contract award cannot be based exclusively on price due
to the nature of the service.
2. The Request for Proposals must identify all evaluation factors and their
relative importance.
3. Vendors submit offers and the resulting award must be either a 1) fixed-
price or 2) cost-reimbursement type contract.
4. Awards do not need to be made to the lowest priced vendor. However, RFP
must indicate that the contract award is to be based on some other non-
price-related factors (i.e. proper licensing, past performance, technical
resources, & etc.).
36May 20, 2017
38. C o m p e t i t i v e P r o p o s a l P r o c e s s
Steps Cost Analysis
Prepare RFP
Publicly Advertise
Evaluate proposals (price & other factors)
Document rationale for determining winner
Negotiate price & award contract
37May 20, 2017
39. S e a l e d B i d s
1. Preferred method for procuring construction services when adequate
specifications exist.
2. The type of contract awarded under sealed bidding is a firm-fixed-price
contract.
3. If the contract amount (including contract modifications) exceeds $150,000
a price or cost analysis must be performed.
4. Price analysis is the most commonly used method to determine fair and
reasonable prices during sealed bid procurements.
38May 20, 2017
40. S e a l e d B i d s P r o c e s s
Steps
Prepare Invitation for Bid (include specifications)
Publicly Advertise
Open bids publicly
Evaluate submitted bids without public discussion
Price Analysis & document winning bidder
Award fixed price contract to responsible bidder whose bid is
most advantageous considering only price-related factors.
39May 20, 2017
41. C o s t o r P r i c e A n a l y s i s
If any procurement
exceeds $150,000
(simplified acquisition
threshold)
Subrecipient
must perform a cost
or price analysis
40May 20, 2017
42. C o s t v s . P r i c e
Cost
•The expense that a business incurs in
bringing a product or service to market.
Price
•Amount customer pays for that
product or service.
41May 20, 2017
43. C o s t A n a l y s i s
Cost Analysis
• Review and evaluate separate
cost elements (i.e. labor hours,
overhead, materials, etc.) and
proposed profit or fee in a
vendor’s proposal in order to
determine a fair and
reasonable price.
How?
• Compare individual cost
elements as proposed by the
Vendor with previously incurred
actual costs for the same work
as completed by the Applicant
through Force Account Labor.
May 20, 2017 42
44. P r i c e A n a l y s i s
Price Analysis
• Once bids are received, a Price
Analysis may be conducted.
• Examine and evaluate
proposed price without
evaluating its separate cost
elements.
How?
• Compare proposed prices
received in response to the
solicitation;
• Compare prior (historical)
proposed prices & contract
prices with current proposed
prices for the same or similar
goods or services;
• Compare offers with
competitively published
catalog prices, published
market prices.
May 20, 2017 43
45. B o n d i n g R e q u i r e m e n t
( c o n s t r u c t i o n )
If construction contract
will exceed $150,000
(simplified acquisition
threshold)
Then a
5% bid guarantee
& a 100%
Performance & Payment
Bond will be required
44May 20, 2017
46. B o n d i n g R e q u i r e m e n t s
Bid
Guarantee
Assurance that the
bidder will, upon
acceptance of the bid
by the NFE, execute
such contractual
documents.
Payment
Bond
Assure payment as
required by law for all
persons supplying labor
and material.
Performance
Bond
Secure fulfillment of all
the contractor’s
obligations under such
contract.
45May 20, 2017
47. R e q u i r e d C o n t r a c t P r o v i s i o n s
• Required contract clauses located
at 2 CFR 200, Appendix II.
• Must be included in all contracts.
• Click here for link to Required
Contract clauses.
May 20, 2017 46
48. S u s p e n d e d o r D e b a r r e d
• A contractor that is listed on the
Excluded Parties List System
found at www.SAM.gov as
suspended or debarred, CANNOT
be awarded a contract funded with
Federal assistance.
• Subrecipient’s vendors or
contractors are not required to
register on sam.gov.
May 20, 2017 47
49. C o s t - p l u s - a - p e r c e n t a g e - o f - c o s t
c o n t r a c t i n g
• Incentivize contractors to increase
costs.
• Higher costs more profit.
• Potential earnings are uncapped.
• Prohibited contract type.
May 20, 2017 48
50. H i g h - l e v e l r e v i e w
Full & open competition;
Maintain procurement history records;
Take affirmative steps to contract with Small & Minority and/or Women
Owned business;
Maintain contractor oversight;
Maintain written standards of conduct re: award & administration of contacts;
Perform cost or price analysis with procurements > $150,000.00;
Avoid cost-plus contracts;
Include required contract provisions.
49May 20, 2017
Welcome guests
2. Introduce speakers on next slide
###
Thursday, May 18
10:30-11:30 AM
1. Introduce Kent
2. Introduce Roman
3. Introduce CR role in Texas.
4. Discuss CR role in performing compliance monitoring on subrecipient procurements
5. (on next page define Procurement).
1. Procurement deals with the sourcing, negotiating and the strategic selection of goods and services.
2. In order to make sure your procurements are eligible for grant funding, one must comply with federal procurement standards.
3. Today we’re going to discuss those standards.
###
Sourcing = finding and evaluating suppliers
To accomplish this we will:
Examine procurement concepts; and then
Clarify subrecipient responsibilities.
By the end of this session, the goal is to increase everyone’s knowledge of:
What the Federal standards are; and
Why those standards exist they way they do.
1. Let’s begin with our key concepts.
Federal grants serve to further national public policy interests.
With FEMA funding and Block Grant funding, we’re specifically looking to get economies back on track following a disaster.
2. However, grant funding is limited. In many cases, Congress must pass a supplemental appropriations bill to make DR funding available.
3. These federal grant dollars come from taxpayer dollars, so inherently, and justifiably so, we should all apply a high level of fiduciary responsibility in administering grant funding.
###
Multihazard Mitigation Council – 2005 study shows that each dollar spent on mitigation saves an average of four dollars. http://www.nibs.org/page/MMC.
Scarcity – “the fundamental economic problem of having seemingly unlimited human wants in a world of limited resources.”
Fiduciary responsibility - duty of care, accountability, & impartiality with taxpayer dollars.
1. As with all grant funding, there is always a risk that the DR funds:
may not be controlled properly,
may be used for purposes other than those intended,
and/or may produce inefficient or uneconomic programmatic results.
2. Here, we can think of waste as spending more than what a prudent person would spend given similar circumstances.
3. An “uneconomic programmatic result” could be a situation where an unqualified contractor produced faulty repairs, which then results in additional money having to be spent to correct these problems.
###
Bullet Point 1 source - Fiduciary risks as explained by USAID https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1868/220mae.pdf
(play video)
(discuss on next slide)
###
Milton Friedman was an American economist who received the 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his research on consumption analysis, monetary history and theory, and the complexity of stabilization policy.
1. What Friedman illustrates in that video clip is that there are also behavioral economics to consider when dealing with federal grants and their procurement rules.
2. It’s safe to say that Procurement regulations have to have:
the flexibility required to effectively acquire goods and services, but also;
protect the taxpayer from the inherent risks.
###
Behavioral Economics: “a method of economic analysis that applies psychological insights into human behavior to explain economic decision-making.”
1. So on the one hand, procurement regulations exist in order to maximize value to the taxpayer/society and curb costs.
1. But that’s not all.
2. Because on the other hand, procurement rules also serve non cost-related purposes.
3. If FEMA; Texas, or you, the Subrecipient, fails to follow procurement rules and regulations, there is also a failure to promote socioeconomic policies of the United States.
4. Specifically, affirmative steps to a contract with Small & Minority and/or Women Owned Business.
5. Small businesses should also have opportunities to compete for work that’s being paid for in part by taxpayer dollars.
1. But that’s not all.
2. Because on the other hand, procurement rules also serve non cost-related purposes.
3. If FEMA; Texas, or you, the Subrecipient, fails to follow procurement rules and regulations, there is also a failure to promote socioeconomic policies of the United States.
4. Specifically, affirmative steps to a contract with Small & Minority and/or Women Owned Business.
5. Small businesses should also have opportunities to compete for work that’s being paid for in part by taxpayer dollars.
(play video)
2. Discuss on next slide.
###
Craig Fugate served as President Barack Obama's FEMA Administrator from May 2009 to January 2017.
1. In that clip, Administrator Fugate hits the nail on the head when he says the FEMA money can do more than just fund repairs.
2. Those same dollars can simultaneously stimulate the local economy if local businesses get in on the action.
3. Two birds. One stone.
1. And this is why there are procurement regulations that encourage full and open competition.
2. If you, the subrecipient, make an effort to cast a wide net when soliciting bids, and you break your federally funded projects into small components, you effectively make it easier for small, local business to compete for that work.
3. Big companies often carry heavy overhead. That’s built into their prices. So, cast a wide net. Not only might you get better prices, you might also provide work for your local business community.
Most importantly, we need to maintain compliance with federal rules and regulations in order to keep receive and keep the eligible grant dollars.
Equally important is documenting your procurement actions so you can demonstrate your compliance to the state & FEMA.
Most importantly, we need to maintain compliance with federal rules and regulations in order to keep receive and keep the eligible grant dollars.
Equally important is documenting your procurement actions so you can demonstrate your compliance to the state & FEMA.
1. Those are the key concepts in terms of WHY procurement rules exist the way they do.
2. Now, let’s take a quick look at the regulatory framework that we’re all operating within.
From FEMA to Subrecipient, each stakeholder has responsibilities in ensuring compliance with the federal regulations.
From this point forward, we’re looking at the responsibilities of the subrecipient.
2 C.F.R. § 200.317 – 326 became effective on December 26, 2014.
Concepts are similar or identical to 44 CFR Part 13.
####
For disasters (and their associated projects) declared prior to that date, the relevant procurement standards can continue to be found in 44 C.F.R. § 13.36(a)-(i) (States, local and tribal governments) and 2 C.F.R. § 215.40-48 (Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Private Non-Profits).1
2 CFR part 200 covers Administrative Requirements & Cost Principles and are the basis for the state’s Accounting Reviews and Compliance Monitoring Efforts.
When you accept a Federal grant, you are also accepting the responsibility to follow Federal rules and regulations.
#####
2 CFR Part 200 combined and superseded eight OMB Circulars. It also superseded 44 CFR § 13.36.
1. The Uniform Administrative Requirements apply to the administration of all federal grants.
These are the regulations that determine how grants are awarded, audited, and closed-out.
2. The Cost Principles, also found in 2 CFR Part 200, are a little different.
These are the regulations which govern how FEMA, TDEM, and you the applicant, will determine allowable, reasonable, and allocable costs.
#####
Known as the “Super Circular” U.A.R. supersedes and combines the requirements of eight existing OMB Circulars (A-21, A-50, A-87, A-89, A-102, A-110, A-122 and A-133).
When the state and FEMA are reviewing your procurements, their testing procedures will ask:
Were the costs Allowable
Were the cost Reasonable; and
Are the costs Allocable?
Because the state and FEMA will be reviewing your actions against the regulations, it’s important that you understand where to look when you want the exact phrasing.
This table is intended to help you locate some of the more pressing federal regulations that you need to be familiar with when you accept a subgrant.
This table is broken out by topic, cites the regulation, and on the far right column you can click a link which will take you to the full regulation text.
This list is specific to the procurement regulations.
Your commissioners, purchasing staff, and audit staff should be familiar with these regulations. in order to avoid non-compliance pitfalls.
Your staff may know your internal processes and rules, however, in the event that the Federal regulations are stricter, Federal requirements control over state and local rules.
A failure to comply with these rules and regulations, even unintentionally, can jeopardize your grant funding.
FEMA/TDEM have the authority to:
Withhold cash payments;
Deny use of funds
Terminate the Federal award;
Start debarment proceedings; &
Withhold further Federal awards.
FEMA’s mission is to assist communities recovering from disasters and they don’t want to hit subrecipients with de-obligations.
However, FEMA is responsible for upholding federal laws. As such is the case, they will have to enforce these remedies from time to time.
The Office of the Inspector General continuously monitors FEMA to make sure the agency is upholding its end of the bargain.
Now that we’ve done a high level overview of concepts, rules, and responsibilities, let’s look at the processes subrecipients must follow.
In many procurement scenarios, especially competitive procurements and sealed bids, your procurement process will generally follow the lifecycle shown in this graphic.
The regulations place procurements in 5 categories.
Micro Purchase
Small Purchase (routine commercial) (fixed price purchase order)
Sealed bids
Competitive proposals; &
Noncompetitive proposals
1. Describe micro-purchase method.
1. Subrecipient must document its determination that the price is fair and reasonable.
Informal method to acquire services.
Must document the procurement history.
Use this method when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids (due to the nature of the service).
Awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming to all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price.
The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold….including contract modifications
The form of analysis typically used to establish the basis for negotiating contract prices when using the procurement through competitive proposals method.
Typically used when acquiring commercial items or when using the procurement through sealed bidding method.
There are bonding requirements for construction contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold.
If the NFE is procuring neither construction nor facility improvement services, then there are no bonding requirements.
Contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II to the Uniform Rules.
A contract award must not be made to parties listed on the SAM Exclusions list