Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Coaching Philosophy

This presentation is on Coaching Philosophies

  • Login to see the comments

Coaching Philosophy

  1. 1. By Rewa Gonzalez-Granda Inder k0517329 COACHING PHILOSOPHY
  2. 2. Aims  To understand coaching styles.  To understand the factors affecting coaching styles.  To understand the different coaching philosophies.  How to improve ones philosophy  To understand the rules in coaching
  3. 3. Definitions  Coaching:  The organized provision of assistance to an individual athlete/group of athletes to help them develop and improve the performance of their chosen sport. (Kent, 2005)  Philosophy:  The pursuit of wisdom helping to answer fundamental questions about what, why and how. (Martens, 2004). Describes a process or method (Hardman & Jones, 2008)  Coaching philosophy:  A coaches belief and guide to become the best coach possible (Clarke, 2008). Basic beliefs that guide every day behaviour (Vealey, 2005).
  4. 4. Coaching  Participation coach:  Is considered to be a coach that focuses on the “taking part” rather than the preparation of a specific sport.  Performance coach:  Is a coach that focuses on long-term goals preparing athletes for sporting competitions. Cross & Lyle, 2003
  5. 5. Coaching Participation Performance Goals Clark, 2008
  6. 6. Coaching Style  Coaching style is defined as a descriptive categorization of the individuals aggregated coaching behaviour  Can also be described as a leadership style  Could be a useful mechanism for describing and analysing coaching practice or it may be a superficial way of caricaturing the most obvious elements of the coaches behaviour (Cross & Lyle, 2003)
  7. 7. Coaching Style continued  It reflects the coaches value framework  It is an analytical tool Lyle, 2006
  8. 8. Factors affecting coaching styles  Kuklinski (1990), Douge and Hastie (1993) stated that factors affecting coaching styles were:  Gender, team/individual sports, age and type of sport  The athletes aspirations  Abraham and Collins (1998) provided a review of literature of factors affecting coaching styles and similar findings were seen Cross & Lyle, 2003
  9. 9. Factors affecting coaching style  Rogers (2007) did a report on coaches behaviour and found several factors that could influence behaviour:  Competitive experience as an athlete  Hours of coaching per week  Individual/team sports  Nevertheless, a better understanding in the relationship between coaches and athletes is needed.  A coach can change their style at will, however, there is little evidence supporting this statement.
  10. 10. Coaches behaviour study  Research into coaches behaviour and athletes self-talk was studied.  243 subjects had to take the athletes‟ positive and negative self-talk scale, to asses how much they use self-talk (positive or negative)  Coaches positive and negative statement scale and Coaching Behaviour Questionnaire.  Results state that a coaches behaviour and statements have a direct impact on athletes self-confidence.
  11. 11. Balancing the triad Optimal Optimal development performance Optimal experience
  12. 12. Coaching Philosophy  Autocratic coaching style  Democratic coaching style  Humanistic approach
  13. 13. Autocratic style of coaching  Autocratic:  Coaching behaviour involving independent decision making and stresses the personal authority of the coach but not the athlete. Lyle, 2006
  14. 14. The Intense style Advantages Disadvantages  Performers put of by the  Coach supports hard demands work  Emotional outburst from  Coach works hard coach Prepared for any type of  The less motivated competition performers are overlooked Lyle, 2006
  15. 15. Democratic style of coaching  Democratic:  Coaching behaviour allowing high levels of participation by the athlete in decision making, goals, practice, game tactics and strategies. Cross & Lyle, 2003
  16. 16. The Nice-Guy style Advantages Disadvantages  Cohesive team  Coach may be seen as weak  Relaxed atmosphere  Socially inhibited athletes overlooked Lyle, 2006
  17. 17. Autocratic vs. Democratic  Coach makes all decisions  Athletes are able to participate in decision-  Directive and dominating making approach to interpersonal-  behaviour There is an inter-active communication process  The exchange of  knowledge, teaching and Athletes values learning assumed to be incorporated into goals and one way evaluation  The coach determines  Coach involves athletes in rules, rewards, standards teaching-learning process and applications  Flexibility, empathy and  Lack of personal empathy support in personal relationships Lyle, 2006
  18. 18. Is an „authoritarian‟ or „democratic‟ style established by experience and a psychological nature or is it a learned capacity (perhaps through coach education)?
  19. 19. Humanistic approach  Are the beliefs and values focusing predominantly on the athlete‟s personal growth through an active engagement in the coaching experience (Cross & Lyle, 2003).  Is a person-centred philosophy or ideology that emphasises the empowerment of the individual towards achieve personal goals within a facilitative interpersonal relationship (Lyle, 2006).
  20. 20. Humanistic approach  It is significant as it is inclined to be used as an indicator for the evaluation of coaching behaviour (Coakley, 1993).  The potential of the humanistic approach is to provide a set of principles to guide coaching practice (Cross & Lyle, 2003)  The whole process is used to aid individual athletes growth and development in a positive way.
  21. 21. Humanistic approach  Hogg (1995) stated that the relationship between the athlete and coach should start as a more directive relationship, gradually sharing relationship and eventually, independence for the athlete.  This increase provides opportunities for personal growth and development.
  22. 22. Hogg‟s model in the evolving relationship between coach and athlete Authoritarian Power sharing Humanistic approach 16-17 18 years & 12 years & 13-15 years years over under • early experience • developing and • empowerment • coach collaborating • athlete independence •Athlete/coach dependence dependence
  23. 23. Humanistic approach  Cross (1990) describes the humanistic approach as „collaborative‟ and „non- manipulative‟.  Cross (1991) characterises suitable behaviour as producing an „open‟ and „no- blame‟ culture using five specific features:  Understand the athletes  Adapt to the athletes needs  Communicate well  Be a motivator  Be consistent
  24. 24. How to improve own philosophy  Know strengths and weaknesses  Recognize values and beliefs  These two aspect will help the coach to adapt to their own style
  25. 25. How to improve own philosophy Confidence in oneself Help others develop High self-worth Martens, 2004
  26. 26. Coaching and ethics  Rules are set to provide a logical framework for coach behaviour.  This framework influence the „how‟ of coaching and some elements in a „code of ethics‟ are related to coaching philosophies.  The sense of right and wrong Cross & Lyle (2003)
  27. 27. Coaching and ethics  Athletes and coaches have to recognize that codes of ethics are socially determined and reflects on a particular ideology, in addition to legal concerns and matters of human and civil rights. (Cross & Lyle, 2003)
  28. 28. Conclusion  To develop a successful philosophy two main factors are needed:  Major objectives  Your beliefs or principles  Get to know ones strengths and weaknesses  Understand coaching context better
  29. 29. Conclusion  Get to know athletes better therefore the coach can tailor the training to the athletes needs.  On the whole, all coaches have some kind of philosophy whether it is natural instinct or formally documented.  Coaching is all about helping the athlete to achieve their dreams.
  30. 30. References  Clark, N. (2008) Coaching Philosophy . Lecture notes  Coakley, J. (1993). Social dimensions of the intensive training and participation in youth sports. Intensive Participation in Children’s Sports (Cahill, B.R. & Pearl, A.J. Editors) Human Kinetics  Cross, N. (1990) Insight into coaching philosophy. The Swimming Times. 68(11) 17-19  Cross, N. (1991) Arguments in Favour of a Humanistic Coaching Process. The Swimming Times. 68(11)17-18  Cross, N. & Lyle, J. (2003) The Coaching Process: principles and practice for sport. Edinburgh: Butterworth-Heinmann Jones, C & Hardman, A (2008) „Philosophy for Coaching‟. In: Jones, R., J., Hughes, M, &  Kingston, K. (Ed) An Introduction to Sport Coaching: From Science and Theory to Practice. USA: Routledge  Kuklinski, B. (1990) Sports Leadership: An Overview. New Zealand Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation. 23(4):29-39  Lyle, J. (2006). Sports Coaching Concepts: A framework for coaches; behaviour. New York: Routledge  Martens, R. (2004) Successful Coaching. (3rd Edition) USA: Human Kinetics Rogers, W. (2007) Factors that Influence Coaches‟ Use of Sound Coaching Practice.  International Journal of Sport Science and Coaching. 2(2)  Vealey, R., S. (2005) Coaching for the Inner Edge. USA: Sheridan Books Zourbanos, N (2007) A preliminary Investigations of Relationship between Athletes‟ Self-  Talk and Coaches. International Journal of Sport Science and Coaching. 2(1) 57-66