making upgrades to training and quality equipment

1. US CORP
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
BY:
Reese Boone
3/5/2016

2. QUALITY MANAGEMENT
OBJECTIVE
• To improve the quality
we are known for, this
project will improve
our production quality.
GOALS
• Re-evaluate the
company’s Quality
Standards and Quality
Plan
• Implement quality
controls and training
• Produce quality
products

3. STAKEHOLDERS
Personal Role or Use in Project
Bradley
Hess
Sponsor of Project- Mr. Hess’s input on the dynamics and vision of the
project will shape what the project will actually accomplish
Reese
Boone
Project Manager- Mr. Boone will be handling the running and
Management of the project from conception to completion. He will be the
main contact channel to the Sponsor and stakeholders. Decisions and
updates will be conveyed through and by him
Mary Jones Project Team Member- Department Personnel in charge of Research
material and General Information.
John Jones Project Team Member- Department personnel in charge of Scheduling
review and General Information
Dan Mann Project Team Member- Department Personnel in charge of Risk
Definition and General Information
Department
Heads
These stakeholders will have to be involved with the changes being
made by the project in their departments. Their input and cooperation
with the changes will be beneficial to the completion and
implementation.

4. WBS

5. RESOURCES
Personnel Type / Role Quantity & Wage Estimated Length of Time Total hrs.’ and Cost
1. PM /manage the project
team
1 (27) 5hrs daily / 93 days 465 hrs. $12,555
2. PMT, Mary Jones
(Research)
1 (18) 2hrs. daily / 93 days 171 hrs. $3078
3. PMT, John Jones
(Scheduling)
1 (18) 2hrs. daily / 93 days 171 hrs. $3078
4. PTM, Dam Mann (Risk) 1 (18) 2hrs. daily / 84 days 168 hrs. $3024
Total 975 hrs. $21,735

6. Estimated Project
Schedule
Milestones
EstimatedDateof
Completion
StartProject StartedonMarch2,2015
1. Initiation March13,2015
2. Planning April24,2015
3. Execution July3,2015
4. Closing/accountingandlessonslearned July8,2015
TotalEstimatedLengthofProject 93days

7. Risk Management

8. Communication Plan
Person Email Phone Medium
M. Jones
Team Member
Mjones@gmail.com 216-522-4588 ext106
D. Mann
Team Member
Dmann@gmail.com 216-522-4588 ext107
R. Boone
Project Manager
Rboone@gmail.com 216-522-4588 ext104
216-522-4588 ext108Jjones@gmail.com
J. Jones Team
Member
Project Stakeholders and Team Members
B. Hess
Sponsor
Bhess@gmail.com 216-522-4588 ext105
Daily
Notification/Communications E-mail Anyone Anyone
To maintain the progress of the
implementation and coordinate
project issues
As Required
End of Day Meeting
Face to
Face/Phone call
Project manager Sponsor
To discuses the issues of the day
and where to start tomorrow
Project Meeting
Conference call
/face to face
Project manager All team members
To initiate the project and the
progress and resolve any issues
Daily
All team members
To update the status of all
activities, reports on those
activities expected to be
accomplished in the next week
Weekly
Frequency
Communication Plan
Facilitator PurposeCommunication Method
Weekly Status Report Project managerE-mail
Participants

9. Communication
Flowchart

10. Change Management form
Project: Change No.:
Submitted by : Date
Title:
Description of the change:
Level of impact: Quality Nil
Current contract value:
Value of this change Current completion to date
Revised contract value: Revised completion date
Comments/Rationale:
Approved:
Project Manager,:_________________________________________
Sponsor _____________________________________
CHANGE MANAGEMENT

11. CHANGE CONTROL BOARD
Name Position CCB Role
B. Hess US CORP Project Sponsor CCB Chair
R. Boone US CORP Project Manager CCB Co-Chair
J. Jones US CORP Project Team Member
/Scheduling
CCB Member
M. Jones US CORP Project Team Member /
Research
CCB Member
D. Mann US CORP Project Team Member / Risk
Definition
CCB Member

12. Estimated Cost of Project
Overhaead TotalCost Shareofcost%
$2,943.00 $3,593.00 12.82%
$1,080.00 $1,580.00 5.64%
$662.00 $2,662.00 9.50%
$2,400.00 $2,650.00 9.46%
$12,150.00 $14,150.00 50.49%
$2,500.00 $3,388.00 12.09%
$21,735.00 $28,023.00 100.00%
BUDGET TABLE:
Testing $888.00
Total $6,288.00
Materialpurchase $2,000.00
Preparation $250.00
Execution $2,000.00
Stakeholderinterviews $500.00
Activities DirectCost
Research $650.00

13. Estimated Cost and Schedule
Initiation Planning Executing Closing Total
Research $3,080.00 $513.00 $3,593.00
Stakeholderinterview $1,580.00 $1,580.00
MaterialPurchase $3,425.00 $3,425.00
Preparation $2,575.00 $2,575.00
Execution $13,650.00 $13,650.00
Testing $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $3,200.00
WeeklyTotal $3,080.00 $9,180.00 $15,250.00 $513.00 $28,023.00
WeeklyCum $3,080.00 $12,260.00 $27,510.00 $28,023.00 $28,023.00
US CorpBudgetedCost

14. QUALITY ASSURANCE LOG
Trial
#
Date Process
Measured
Required
Value
Actual
Measured
Acceptable?
(Y/N)
Recommendation Date
Resolved

15. PROCUREMNT PLAN
Supplier
Rating
(Y&N)
US Corp
Supplier Development Plan
Sr. No. Supplier Name Product /Service Category
Q.M.S. Certicication
(Y/N or N/A)
Supplier
Audit
(Y&N)
Other
Requirements
(If Any)

16. PROCUREMNT PLAN
Pass / Fail
Tolerance Given
oo1o Hardness
oo2o
oo3o Hardness
oo4o
oo5o
oo6o
Routing Number
Packaging
Rough Turning
Specification
Actual
ID
OD
Length
Assembly
Surface Finish
Test
ID
OD
Length
Heat Treat
Finish Turn
Comments
Size
Size
Boxes UsedShipping
Material Incoming Inspection
Item

17. Project Situation
Team Member
Unable To Complete
Task On Time

18. Solution
• Talk to other team member department head to
ask if I can use him an extra 1 per day
• Approved, Team member Dan will give an extra
hour per day to assist Mary for research.
• Dan will work an extra 90 hours on the project.
• It will cost an extra 1,620 dollars
• Have contingency of 2,802.30 dollars
• Following slide will show the before and the after
of the change, no change in schedule just the cost
will be effected.

19. Hours Change
Before Change
After Change
Personnel Type / Role Quantity & Wage Estimated Length of Time Total hrs.’ and Cost
1. PM /manage the project
team
1 (27) 5hrs daily / 93 days 465 hrs. $12,555
2. PMT, Mary Jones
(Research)
1 (18) 2hrs. daily / 93 days 171 hrs. $3078
3. PMT, John Jones
(Scheduling)
1 (18) 2hrs. daily / 93 days 171 hrs. $3078
4. PTM, Dam Mann (Risk) 1 (18) 2hrs. daily / 84 days 168 hrs. $3024
Total 975 hrs. $21,735
Personnel Type / Role Quantity & Wage Estimated Length of Time Total hrs.’ and Cost
1. PM /manage the project
team
1 (27) 5hrs daily / 93 days 465 hrs. $12,555
2. PMT, Mary Jones
(Research)
1 (18) 2hrs. daily / 93 days 171 hrs. $3078
3. PMT, John Jones
(Scheduling)
1 (18) 2hrs. daily / 93 days 171 hrs. $3078
4. PTM, Dam Mann (Risk) 1 (18) 3hrs. daily / 93 days 268 hrs. $4644
Total 1065 hrs. $23,355

20. Cost Change
• In the first phase of the project you will see an increase
of $270 (work 10 days), in Second phase it will increase
$207 (work 30 days), in the third phase it will raise
$1067 (work 50 days). This is do to the amount of hours
that is worked in each phase.
Initiation Planning Executing Closing Total
Research $3,080.00 $513.00 $3,593.00
Stakeholder interview $1,580.00 $1,580.00
Material Purchase $3,425.00 $3,425.00
Preparation $2,575.00 $2,575.00
Execution $13,650.00 $13,650.00
Testing $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $3,200.00
Weekly Total $3,080.00 $9,180.00 $15,250.00 $513.00 $28,023.00
Weekly Cum $3,080.00 $12,260.00 $27,510.00 $28,023.00 $28,023.00
US CorpBudgeted Cost

21. Overhaead TotalCost Shareofcost%
$3,213.00 $3,863.00 13.06%
$1,350.00 $1,850.00 6.26%
$870.00 $2,870.00 9.71%
$2,670.00 $2,870.00 9.71%
$12,420.00 $14,520.00 49.11%
$2,770.00 $3,595.00 12.16%
$23,293.00 $29,568.00 100.00%
Testing $825.00
Total $6,275.00
ACTUAL / BUDGET TABLE:
Activities DirectCost
Research $650.00
Stakeholderinterviews $500.00
Materialpurchase $2,000.00
Preparation $200.00
Execution $2,100.00
ACTUAL BUDGET TABLE

22. ACTUAL BUDGET
CONTINENGCY10%ofTotalCost $2,802.30 $30,825.30
Initiation Planning Executing Closing TOTAL
Research $3,350.00 $513.00 $3,863.00
Stakeholderinterview $1,850.00 $1,850.00
MaterialPurchase $2,870.00 $2,870.00
Preparation $2,870.00 $2,870.00
Execution $14,520.00 $14,520.00
Testing $1,797.50 $1,797.50 $3,595.00
WeeklyTotal $3,350.00 $9,387.50 $16,317.50 $513.00 $29,568.00
WeeklyCum $3,350.00 $12,737.50 $29,055.00 $29,568.00 $29,568.00
US CorpActualCost

23. EARNED VALUE
Performance Measure Yellow Red
Schedule Performance Index (SPI) Between 0.9 and 0.8 or
Between 1.1 and 1.2
Less Than 0.8 or Greater
than 1.2
Cost Performance Index (CPI) Between 0.9 and 0.8 or
Between 1.1 and 1.2
Less Than 0.8 or Greater
than 1.2
Initiation Planning Executing Closing TOTAL
PV $3,080.00 $12,260.00 $27,510.00 $28,023.00 $28,023.00
AC $3,350.00 $12,737.50 $29,055.00 $29,568.00 $29,568.00
EV 11.33% 43.08% 98.27% 100.00% 100.00%
ev $770.00 $6,130.00 $20,632.50 $28,023.00 $28,023.00
SV -$2,310.00 -$6,130.00 -$6,877.50 $0.00 $0.00
CV -$2,580.00 -$6,607.50 -$8,422.50 -$1,545.00 -$1,545.00
SPI 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1
CPI 0.229850746 0.481256133 0.71011874 0.947747565 0.947747565
EAC $3,249.81 $12,935.93 $29,026.72 $29,568.00 $29,568.00
Note: Use the 0/100 rule for completion percentage
Earned Value

24. S CURVE
$0.00
$5,000.00
$10,000.00
$15,000.00
$20,000.00
$25,000.00
$30,000.00
$35,000.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
COST
S CURVE
Weekly Cum
Actual Cum

25. Project Deliverables
(Planned vs. Actual)
Planned Deliverable Actual Deliverable Summary
Complete review of procedures to
understand where quality is lacking
Completed review of former quality plan for
flaws
This deliverable was completed as planned
Quality Review
Planned Deliverable Actual Deliverable Summary
Train employees in proper quality
procedures.
Train employees in proper quality
procedures.
This deliverable was completed as planned
Quality Protocol Training

26. Project Deliverables
(Planned vs. Actual)
Planned Deliverable Actual Deliverable Summary
Testing used material to meet standards Testing used material to meet standards This deliverable was completed as
planned
Material Testing
Planned Deliverable Actual Deliverable Summary
Correct equipment in use to increase
quality
Correct equipment in use to increase
quality
This deliverable was completed as
planned
Follow up training on quality procedures
with employees to raise productivity
Follow up training on quality procedures
with employees to raise productivity
This deliverable was completed as
planned
Correct material and vendor usage to drop
budget.
Use of only approved materials with
exception of approved material/vendor list
Material and vendor list is under review
with legal department and will be added
upon approval
Final Project Deliverables
Final Project Deliverables

27. LESSONS LEARNED
• 1: Continuous training and follow up will need to done. This
will ensure the plan is understood and followed correctly.
• 2: All measuring equipment will have to be on a regularly
schedule, In order to keep the up our quality standards.
• 3: Researching US alloy project archives was very beneficial
in establishing budgets and schedules for the project phases.
As a result of studying documentation from similar past
projects the Quality Control Implementation project team was
able to accurately determine budgets, work packages
required, and resources allocation.