In this presentation, we constructed 15 temporary bent foundations for the New Champlain Bridge. The presentation is about the project management done for this project.

2. The New Champlain Bridge is One of the largest
infrastructure projects in north America.
The Bridge will span 3.4 km and connect Montreal
to Brossard. It will replace the existing bridge.
Temporary Foundations are required to support
the construction of the Backspan of the Cable
Stayed portion of the bridge.

4. • THE CONSTRUCTION OF BACKSPAN TEMPORARY BENTS
FOUNDATIONS BETWEEN MST (MAINSPAN TOWER) AND
PIER W02, LOCATED IN THE SAINT LAWRENCE RIVER, OFF
THE EXISTING DYKE.
• THE FOUNDATIONS DESIGN CALLS FOR DRIVEN H-PILES AND
CONCRETE PILE CAPS AND TIE BEAMS.
• THE TEMPORARY BENTS AND THEIR FOUNDATIONS ARE
LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE FUTURE BRIDGE,
ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE SEAWAY DYKE.

6. Project Description:
 The Design and Construction of 15 Foundations for the Backspan temporary bents.
Project Deliverables:
 Complete geotechnical study
 Produce design documents and drawings
 Procurement
 Complete construction

7.  Project Objectives:
• The main objective of our project is to produce all deliverables on time and within budget.
• Perform all work and in conformance with project specification and quality plan.
• Turning in foreseen profit.
 Main Project Success Criteria:
• All the functional requirements of the project should be met.
• Project should be done within the time and budget
• Perform the work to the satisfaction of client.
• Handover and respect milestone dates.
 Project team resources: Daksh Raj Chopra, Rabih Ataya , Harmandeep singh , Harmanjeet
singh parmar
 Date Of Authorization: 22 Feb 2016
 Project Start Date: 1 April 2016
 Date Of Completion: 15 June 2016
 Budget Information: The firm has allocated $315,385 + 20% profit for the project.
 Project Manager: Parth Avinash Chauhan

8. STRENGTHS:
 Experienced staff
 Reputed Construction Firm
 Expertise in execution of similar projects
 Established and maintained a strong
base
WEAKNESSES:
 Scarce Manpower
 High labor cost
 Lack of modern equipment
OPPORTUNITIES:
 Government support and Tax rebates
 Relation with Client on a big Project
 Work experience
 Growing demand
THREATS:
 Climatic condition
 Increasing labor cost
 Natural calamities
 Exchange rate varies a lot

9. Rev. Item # Facility CRC Description
Estimated
Qty R1
Estimated
Qty R0
Delta
Unit of
Measure
Direct
Manhours
Permanent
equipment
(1)
Material
(2)
Installation
Hrs+equip.
(3)
Total
(1+2+3)
1.0 12201 21100 Indirect Costs (All other costs are included in direct costs)
1.1 12201 21100 Mobilization 1 1 Lot 4,500.00 $
1.2 12201 21100 Demobilization 1 1 Lot 1,500.00 $
The Bidder must supply the fulll breakdow n of mobilization and demobilization costs w ith its bid.
1.3 12201 21100 Insurance 1 1 Lot
1.4 12201 21100 Temporary Facilities (including but not limited to site offices, trailers, potable
water, power and maintenance)
10 10
week
500.00 $
1.5 12201 21100 Administrative support, technicians, surveyors, supervision, management, etc… 10 10 week 5,000.00 $
For items 1.4 & 1.5, the Bidder must indicate the number of w eeks for w hich this price is
applicable
1.6 12201 21100 Bonds
1.7 12201 21100 Other indirect & general costs not covered above
1.7.1 12201 21100 Define : ______________________________________________________________ 1 1 Lot
1.7.2 12201 21100 Define : ______________________________________________________________ 1 1 Lot
1.7.3 12201 21100 Define: ______________________________________________________________ 1 1 Lot
Subtotal - Indirect Prices 11,500.00 $
2.0 12201 21100 Temporary Foundations
2.1 12201 21100 Foundations for tower type 1
2.1.1 12201 21100 Formwork Installation (foundations & tie-beams) 215 -215 m2
2.1.2 12201 21100 Concrete pouring 120 -120 m3
2.1.3 12201 21100 Stripping 215 -215 m2
2.2 12201 21100 Foundations for tower type 2 &3
2.2.1 12201 21100 Formwork Installation (foundations & tie-beams) 750 740 10 m2 675 20,250.00 47,250.00 67,500.00 $
2.2.2 12201 21100 Concrete pouring 600 530 70 m3 520 36,375.00 36,375.00 $
2.2.3 12201 21100 Stripping 750 740 10 m2 236 16,500.00 16,500.00 $
2.3 12201 21100 Foundations for tower type 4
2.3.1 12201 21100 Formwork Installation (foundations & tie-beams) 660 340 320 m2 594 17,820.00 41,580.00 59,400.00 $
2.3.2 12201 21100 Concrete pouring 390 280 110 m3 349 24,420.00 24,420.00 $
2.3.3 12201 21100 Stripping 660 340 320 m2 207 14,520.00 14,520.00 $
2.4 12201 21100 Foundations for tower type 5
2.4.1 12201 21100 Formwork Installation (foundations & tie-beams) 580 520 60 m2 522 15,660.00 36,540.00 52,200.00 $
2.4.2 12201 21100 Concrete pouring 320 270 50 m3 289 20,210.00 20,210.00 $
2.4.3 12201 21100 Stripping 580 520 60 m2 182 12,760.00 12,760.00 $
Subtotal - Direct Prices 3,574 53,730.00$ 250,155.00$ 303,885.00 $
3,574 53,730.00$ 250,155.00$ 315,385.00 $TOTAL

10. Discount Rate (Yearly)= 15% Discount Rate (Weekly)= 0.3%
Week 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Payment $ 75,692.40 $ 75,692.40 $ 75,692.40 $ 75,692.40 $ 75,692.40
Procurement -$ 53,730.00
Labor+Overhead
Milestone 1 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67
Milestone 2 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67
Milestone 3 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67
Milestone 4 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67
Milestone 5 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67
Total -$ 53,730.00 -$ 17,443.67 -$ 17,443.67 $ 40,805.07 -$ 34,887.33 $ 40,805.07 $ 40,805.07 -$ 34,887.33 $ 40,805.07 $ 58,248.73
PV -$ 53,730.00 -$ 17,391.49 -$ 17,339.47 $ 40,440.01 -$ 34,471.81 $ 40,198.46 $ 40,078.23 -$ 34,163.41 $ 39,838.83 $ 56,699.35
NPV $ 60,158.70

11.  On March 17,2016
 Group members were introduced.
 Background review of project was done.
 Project Charter and Project Scope Statement was discussed and finalized.
 Discussion of project goals and deliverables.
 Assigning responsibilities to each team member and prioritizing tasks.

16. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

17. LIKELIHOOD/PROBABILITY
HIGH R6, R7, R9
MEDIUM R1, R5, R10 R4
LOW R2 R3 R8
LOW MEDIUM HIGH
Risk Index Rank Risk Title Category Triggers
R1
7
Increase in raw material cost Cost
Due to
inflation/market
variation
R2
9
Delay in design Technical
Unknown scope
R3
10
Insufficient flow of
information Technical
Inefficient
communication
system
R4
2 Approval of unrealistic
deadlines Schedule
Client pressure
R5
6 Complying the quality
standards Client related
Inadequate
quality plan
R6
4
Labour issues Political
Labour strikes
R7
8 Coactivity with other
contractors Schedule
Poor planning
R8
1
Natural Risk Environment
Natural disaster
R9
5
Insufficient training of the
staff Technical
Company saving
on labour
development
R10
3
Delay due to environment
circumstances Environment
Natural
Risk
Prioritization
Qualitative
Risk Analysis
Quantitative
Risk Analysis

18. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

19. Project Deliverable (or Activity) Harmandeep Harmanjeet Rabih Parth Daksh
Initiation Financial Analysis Business Case Scope Statement
Project Charter
Activity Cost Estimation
R I A I C
Planning
Work Breakdown Structure Gantt Chart
Risk Register
Probability Impact Matrix Risk breakdown Structure Network
Quality Management Plan
I A C C R
Execution
Work Performance Information Procurement Management Plan Make or
Analysis
R I A I C
Monitoring and Control
Quality Assurance
Quality metrics Quality check list
A R C A I
Closing
Project Closure Checklist Project Closing Document Lessons learned
C I A C R

20. • UALITY ASSURANCE PLAN DRAFTED
• SET OF INSPECTION AND TESTING PLANS
• SITE LABORATORY FACILITY FORMED FOR VARIOUS TESTING
• CLIENT ENGINEERS WILL BE CONDUCTING FIELD AUDITS
EACH MONTH

21. •
•
•
•

22. •
•
•
•
•

23. 
•
•

•
•
•
•

24. 
•
•
•
•

25. Item Yes
/No
n/a comments
1. Is quality assurance plan prepared for
construction?
yes Formed during planning phase
2. Is quality assurance plan is accessible to all
stake holders?
yes Copy has been sent to each
3. Is quality metrics defined? yes Quality metrics has been made
during monitoring and controlling
process
4. Whether everyone agreed upon the metrics? yes
5. Do all the team members have access to
quality documents?
yes
6. Whether there is a contingency plan for all
the quality defects?
yes Plan was formed during planning
7. Has the quality testing of the product is done
before final approval or delivery?
yes Done by the laboratory site
engineer
9. Does project have enough resources to
facilitate quality related activities?
yes
10. Is manufacturing plan clearly defined? yes

26. • ITP’S
•
•
•

27. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

28. •
•
•
•
•

29. •
•
•