2. Introduction
Was introduced to achieve higher speed and
accuracy in surgery
Examples of their use - UKR, THR, Spine
pedicle screw placement
Reduction of error
Improved surgical technique
Minimally invasive surgery may be done
However, due to high on-table setup time for
the machines, time taken may be the same, if
not more
3. Updates to software and equipment
Cost
Learning curve
Ultimate results in robots v.s. Manual....is there a
significant difference?
4. Principle of Use
Pre op templating with software, creation of
patient-specific model an surgical plan
Orienting the robot to the patient's anatomy
through uploading of CT scans
Imageless systems – do the same intra-op
Intraoperative registration of the model and
plan
Employment of the robot for bone-cuts and
carrying out the pre-operative plan
5. Robotic Systems
Autonomous
Surgeon performs approach, then sets up the
machine and engages the robot
Robot works by itself
Haptic (tactile)
Surgeon drives the robot's arms
Constant input from surgeon
Image vs. Imageless
Closed vs. Open platforms – company specific
Soft Tissue – DaVinci Robot (used since 2000)
6. Haptic Robotic System
Unicondylar Knee Replacement – Robotic arm
interactive orthopedic system – RIO made by
Mako Surgical Corp.
Pre op CT used for 3D model of knee
Surgeon marks the bony surfaces of femur
and tibia intra op, allowing the pre op model to
be merged into the active anatomy
Knee ROM is seen, flex/ex gaps assessed,
component sizing and placement finalized,
and cutting zone is created
3D model can be viewed which cutting with the
burr
7. Resection of bone is confined to the pre-defined
space on the force controlled tip of the burr
If the surgeon exceeds the cutting zone, the burr
automatically stops
Roche et al. (2010) measured 344 radiological
parameters in 43 cases...only 3 were off
Cobb et al. Used the Acrobot robot
Robots gave better American Knee Society
scores, increased operative time
Better alignment and positioning
Accuracy within 2 degrees of pre op plan....only
40% of manual cases had within 2 degree
accuracy
8. Autonomous Robotic Systems
Surgeon is in control of an emergency shut-off
switch
ROBODOC – introduced in 1992 (Curexo Tech,
California)
MBARS (Mini bone attached robotic system)
Hybrid system – Carnegie Mellon University,
Pittsburg, PA
ROBODOC – showed promise in THR, but had
safety concerns
Praxiteles (Praxim, France) also developed
9.
10.
11.
12. Passive Surgery System –
Computer Navigation
Used for assessing joint irregularities and
biomechanics
Recommendations – ex. Ligament balancing
Monitor accuracy of bone cuts
Track instrumentation
Geometry
Alignment
Cameras communicate with instruments and bony
landmarks through LED
13. Manual override option is there
Surgeon is not limited to pre-defined cutting
zones
Useful in early learning curve
14.
15. Pitfalls
Setup required is expensive
Constant upgradations and calibrations
Long term studies haven't proven superiority as
yet
Robots can identify the bony anatomy well,
however the nuances of soft tissue dissection are
not yet programmed – risk of hitting neurovascular
structures, more soft tissue damage
Legality/ litigation?
16. Minimal Access Robotic Assisted
Spine Surgery
Pedicle screw placement
Mazor Robotics' Renaissance (FDA approved)
Workstation
Planning software
Guidance unit which moves in all planes
Spinal mounting platforms
17.
18. Surgical Technique
Preparation of robot (3D CT, planning)
Patient positioning
Attaching the universal image adaptor to C arm
Affixing clamp and taking AP and 60' oblique
views
Assembling bridge and preparing and activating
the device
Approach
Take the arm indicated by software, align holes
of the arm plate with the pins of the device
19. Make incision with the scalpel through arm tube
Insert cannula into arm tube, push and rotate blunt
trocar
Drill guide in cannula, drill bit in the guide,
reduction tube in the drilled hole
Insert guidewire, split muscle with dilators, and
insert the screws
20. Advantages
Accurate, safe, relatively easy to learn and use
Less radiation
Minimal blood loss, less hospital stay, less
analgesia post op
Disadvantages
Device related – failure of software
Patient related complications
Infection