This document summarizes changes made to the weightages and metrics across various key indicators for Criterion 6 (Governance, Leadership and Management) and Criterion 7 (Institutional Values and Best Practices) in the NAAC assessment process. Some metrics were combined and their weightages redistributed between key indicators. For example, in Criterion 6, the weightage for Faculty Empowerment Strategies was increased from 30 to 35 by adjusting weights within its metrics. In Criterion 7, the weightage for Gender Equity under Institutional Values was increased from 5 to 10.
Filters for Electromagnetic Compatibility Applications
C6 AND C7.pptx
1. Distribution of Weightages across Key Indicators (KIs)
Criterion 6- Governance, Leadership and Management-Weightage
100
1
CRITERIA AND KEY INDICATORS
OLD
WEIGHTAGE
(100)
NEW
WEIGHTAGE
(100)
Key Indicator- 6.1 Institutional Vision
and Leadership
10 10
Key Indicator- 6.2 Strategy
Development and
Deployment
10 10
Key Indicator- 6.3 Faculty
Empowerment
Strategies
30 35
Key Indicator- 6.4 Financial
Management and
Resource Mobilization
20 15
Key Indicator- 6.4 Internal Quality
Assurance System
30 30
2. Criterion 6- Governance, Leadership and Management
(100)
Key Indicator- 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (10)
Metrics Old Manual New Manual Change in Weightage
6.1.1
QlM
The governance of the institution is
reflective of and in tune with the
vision and mission of the
institution (5)
both metrics clubed
together
Weightage is 10 (QlM 10)
6.1.2
QlM
The effective leadership is visible in
various institutional practices
such as decentralization and
participative management.(5)
2
3. Criterion 6- Governance, Leadership and Management
(100)
Key Indicator-- 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (10)
Metrics Old Manual New Manual Change in Weightage
6.2.1
QlM
The institutional Strategic/ perspective
plan is effectively deployed(2) both metrics clubed
together
Weightage is 6 (QlM 6)
6.2.2
QlM
The functioning of the institutional
bodies is effective and efficient as
visible from policies, administrative
setup, appointment and service rules,
procedures, etc. (4)
6.2.3.
QnM
Implementation of e-governance in
areas of operation(4)
NO CHANGE Weightage is 4 (QnM 4)
4. Criterion 6- Governance, Leadership and Management (100)
Key Indicator--6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (30)
Metrics Old Manual New Manual Change in
Weightage
6.3.1
QlM
The institution has effective welfare measures for
teaching and nonteaching staff (5) both metrics
clubed together
Weightage↓ from
10 to 8 (QlM 15)
6.3.5
QlM
Institutions Performance Appraisal System for
teaching and nonteaching staff(5)
6.3.2
QnM
Average percentage of teachers provided with
financial support to attend conferences/
workshops and towards membership fee of
professional bodies during the last five years(10)
Weightage ↑ from 10 to 12(QnM 12)
6.3.3
QnM
Average number of professional development
/administrative training
programs organized by the institution for teaching
and non teaching
staff during the last five years(5)
both metrics
clubed together
Weightage ↑
from 10 to 15
(QnM 15)
6.3.4
QnM
Average percentage of teachers undergoing
online/face-to-face
Faculty development Programmes (FDP) during
the last five years(5) 4
5. Criterion 6- Governance, Leadership and Management (100)
Key Indicator--6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (20)
Metri
cs
Old Manual New Manual Change in
Weightage
6.4.1
QlM
Institution conducts internal and external financial
audits regularly(6) three metrics
clubed together
Funds / Grants
received from
individuals,
philanthropers
removed
Weightage↓ from
20 to 15
6.4.2
QnM
Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies,
individuals,
philanthropers during the last five years (8)
6.4.3
QlM
Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and
the optimal
utilisation of resources(6)
6. Criterion 6- Governance, Leadership and Management (100)
Key Indicator--6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30)
Metri
cs
Old Manual New Manual Change in
Weightage
6.5.1
QlM
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has
contributed significantly
for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies
and processes(10)
two metrics
clubed
together
Weightage↓ from
20 to 15
6.5.2
QlM
The institution reviews its teaching learning process,
structures &
methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at
periodic
intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and
recorded the
incremental improvement in various activities (10)
6.5.3
QnM
Quality assurance initiatives of the institution
include:
1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell
(IQAC);
Feedback collected, analysed and used for
improvements
2. Collaborative quality intitiatives with other
institution(s)
3. Participation in NIRF
Weightage ↑ from 10 to 15
7. Distribution of Weightages across Key
Indicators (KIs)
Criterion 7- Institutional Values and Best
Practices-Weightage 100
7
CRITERIA AND KEY INDICATORS
OLD
WEIGHTAGE
(100)
NEW
WEIGHTAGE
(100)
Key Indicator- 7.1 Institutional
Values and Social
Responsibilities
50 50
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices 30 30
Key Indicator- 7.3 Institutional
Distinctiveness
20 20
8. Criterion 7- – Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)
Key Indicator-7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)
Metrics Old Manual New Manual Change in
Weightage
7.1.1
QlM
Measures initiated by the Institution for the
promotion of gender equity
during the last five years. (5)
Weightage ↑
from 5 to 10
7.1.2
QnM
The Institution has facilities for alternate sources
of energy and energy
conservation measures ( 5)
all clubed
together
Weightage↓
from 21 to 20
7.1.3
QlM
management of the following
types of degradable and non-degradable waste ( 4)
7.1.4
QnM
Water conservation facilities available in the
Institution:( 4)
7.1.5QnM Green campus initiatives (4)
7.1.7QnM The Institution has disabled-friendly, barrier free
environment (4)
7.1.6
QnM
Quality audits on environment and energy
regularly undertaken by the
Institution. (5)
Weightage ↑
from 5 to 10
8
9. Criterion 7- – Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)
Key Indicator-7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)
Metrics Old Manual New Manual Change in
Weightage
7.1.8
QlM
Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an
inclusive
environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards
cultural, regional,
linguistic, communal socioeconomic and other
diversities (5)
two metrics
clubed
together
Weightage↓ from
9 to 10
7.1.9
QlM
Sensitization of students and employees of the
Institution to the constitutional
obligations: values, rights, duties and
responsibilities of citizens (4)
7.1.10
QnM
The Institution has a prescribed code of conduct for
students, teachers,
administrators and other staff and conducts
periodic programmes in this
regard. (5)
removed
7.1.11
QlM
Institution celebrates / organizes national and
international commemorative
days, events and festivals (5)
removed
9
10. Criterion 7- – Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)
Key Indicator-7.2 Best Practices (30)
Metrics Old Manual New Manual Change in
Weightage
7.2.1
QlM
Describe two best practices successfully
implemented by the Institution as
per NAAC format provided in the Manual. (30)
No Change
10
11. Criterion 7- – Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)
Key Indicator-7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20)
Metrics Old Manual New Manual Change in
Weightage
7.3.1
QlM
Portray the performance of the Institution in one
area distinctive to its
priority and thrust within 1000 words(20)
No Change
11
