SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Download to read offline
PRACTICAL PRODUCTION USES OF SMT ADHESIVES
By Steven Rocco Marongelli, Douglas Dixon,
Sergio Porcari, Wendy Cummings,
Frank Murch, Al Osterhout
Universal Instruments
GDM Product Team
PO Box 825
Binghamton, NY USA
13902-0825
607-779-1134
Introduction
Adhesives are typically used in surface mount Printed Circuit Board (PCB) assemblies to hold
the passive, (and sometimes active), components on to the bottom side of the board during
wave soldering. The adhesive is used to bond the surface mount device (SMD) to the PCB, thus
forming a joint between the body of the (SMD) and the solder resist or bare FR-4 board between
the solder pads. This is necessary to avoid the displacement of components from their sites
during high speed placement of passive components. Dispensing equipment must be able to
dispense a precise consistent dot shape with different volumes as appropriate for different size
devices. After the SMD is placed, the wet adhesive must have
sufficient “wet” or “green” strength to hold the SMD in position until cured.
Figure 1
The hardening process must be fast and simple. The cured adhesive must then have sufficient
strength to hold the SMD to the PCB during the solder wave operation. After soldering the
adhesive must not affect operation of the circuit in any way.
Generally the spacing between the component pads dictates the maximum allowable adhesive
dot diameter that can be dispensed between the pads. Typically the adhesive dot diameter will
be 2/3 the pad spacing. Once the allowable adhesive dot diameter has been determined, the
appropriate nozzle can be selected. A dual dot nozzle or single dot nozzle should be chosen at
this time.
PCB
Acceptable
PCB PCB
Unacceptable
Pad Contamination
Unacceptable
Component Bond Area
Sufficient
Component Bond Area
Insufficient
Why Dual Dots
From time to time the question comes up about why dual
dots are sometimes used and sometimes not. The reasons
are very logical but rarely stated. Adhesive adheres to a
surface in a way that is directly proportional to its area. The
amount of adhesive one can put under a component with a
single dot is shown in figure 2. This assumes a 3 mil stand
off and pad widths matching the component. The mass of
each of these common components is also shown in figure 3.
The 0805 and larger components are thicker and therefore
have more mass. The amount of adhesion area required
increases because of the increase in mass. However the
space under the component is limited. The Figure 2
relationship between mass and area is shown in figure 3.
The 0805 component is the breaking point where the
advantage of using dual dots exists but is not strong. The
components larger than 0805s require dual dots. In
addition to the increased mass these larger components
have higher centers of gravity due to the increased
thickness. Naturally, the exact point where the area and
the green or cured strength balance, depends on the
specific adhesive and the G forces of the chip shooter.
Nozzle Selection
Choosing a nozzle for use in dispensing adhesives requires knowledge of what dot size is
required. The dot size requirements can be derived from the board design being utilized or
specifically the pad spacing of components. It is not uncommon for Manufacturing Engineer
personnel or Quality Engineering personnel of a printed circuit board manufacturing facility, to
inquire what a recommended adhesive dot diameter should be for a particular component type.
Much has been written in regards to recommended surface mount component pad designs and
layouts for bottom side applications. (“Wave Solder”) Top side pad designs are used on bottom
side PCB fabrication. However these guidelines are rarely utilized. The pad spacing for a
particular component for each individual customer product is unique. Universal’s surface mount
laboratory, has recommended component pad spacing guidelines for use when designing
printed circuit boards for adhesive application.
0402
(1005)
0603
(1608)
0805
(2012)
1206
(3216)
1210
(3225)
Dual Dot Advantage
0
50
100
150
200
0402 0603 0805 1206 1210
Ratio
of
Force
to
Area
Single Dot
Single Dot
Dual Dot
0402 0603 0805 1206 1210
A 0.013" 0.020" 0.035" 0.040" 0.060"
B 0.025" 0.040" 0.040" 0.070" 0.070"
C 0.121" 0.140" 0.140" 0.205" 0.205"
D1 0.010"-0.015" 0.020"-0.025"
D2 0.020"-0.035" 0.020"-0.035" 0.020"-0.035"
E 0.035" 0.035" 0.035"
A
C
B
D1
E
Recommended Contact Pattern Footprint D2
Table 1
Because the pad spacing for most typical surface mount components is not standardized from
one customer product to another, it becomes a challenging task when recommending what
tooling should be utilized to satisfy a particular customers adhesive deposition requirement for a
particular component.
Typically, surface mount component pads for a particular circuit board are designed for either
adhesive deposition or screening of solderpaste. (See Figure 4) The pad spacing is generally
smaller for solderpaste application as opposed to that of adhesive deposition. For example, the
component pad spacing between the pads of an 0603 chip cap/resistor is typically 0.020” if the
board was designed to be screen printed with solderpaste. The pad spacing for the same board
can be 0.040” if adhesive deposition was intended to be utilized.
A 0.030” diameter dot of
adhesive would easily be
recommended for use if the
component pads on the board
were indeed designed for
adhesive deposition. However, if
the pad design for the same
board was originally designed
for utilization of solderpaste, as
a method of adhering the
component to the board,
obviously
an 0.030” diameter dot of adhesive Figure 4
would be too large, as the spacing
between the pads is now 0.020”. A
0.040"
0.030"
0603
0603
Typical Wave Solder Pad Layout For
0603 Chip Component
Typical Solder Paste Pad Layout For
0603 Chip Component
0603
0603
Typically 0.015" - 0.020"
Typically 0.018" - 0.025"
0.015” to 0.018” diameter dot is required for this particular application.
Therefore, because all pad design and spacing is not the same from one circuit board to another
the actual spacing between the pads of the particular component must be known.
Note that the volume of adhesive needed to maintain the component in place during the high
speed placement or wave solder process may be larger than possible for some specific pad
designs. Nozzle selection refers in this case to specific nozzle specifications for a known dot
size requirement.
When selecting a nozzle for use in dispensing adhesives,
the main parameters needed for correctly determining
correct nozzle selection are Nozzle ID, Nozzle Stand-Off,
and Dot Diameter. The nozzle standoff can be defined as
the distance from the tip of the dispensing surface to the
end of the mechanical standoff. The nozzle standoff is used
to maintain the distance between the PCB and the
dispensing tip. Most dispensers in use today are designed
to utilize some sort of mechanical standoff with Figure 5
the nozzles.
The stand-off usually dictates, to some degree, the height of the dispensed dot. If the stand-off is
too large the adhesive may never contact the board. If this condition exists than the adhesive will
build up on the bottom side of the nozzle. Generally this condition leads to poor dot shapes,
inconsistent volume, stringing and missing dots.
Relationship Of Adhesive Dot Height To Component Height From the Board
The distance between the bottom of the component and the top of the PC board is typically
between 0.003” to 0.005”. In order to assure a good bond or wetting of the adhesive to the
bottom of the component as it is placed onto the PC board, a good rule of thumb is to utilize a
dot height that is twice the distance between the bottom of the component and the top of the PC
board.
Stand Off
Noz
I.D.
PCB
Figure 6
Table 2
From table 2 above it can be derived that as the nozzle ID and nozzle standoff decrease the dot
diameter range also diminishes. It can also be noted that the recommended standoff for the 8
mil ID nozzle is the same as the 10 mil nozzle. It is recommended not to to go below the 5 mil
standoff due to tolerancing of PCB fabrication. Dot diameters smaller than that of a 16 mil dot
require special care from board manufacturing. Slight variations of pad heights and solder mask
on the PCB add up to large variations in actual mechanical standoff while dispensing. When
dispensing dots that require going through nozzles of 8 mils or less the adhesives used and the
particle size within the adhesives. Small nozzle ID’s with large particle size will tend to clog more
often making for a less than robust manufacturing process.
PCB
Component
Pad
Adhesive Solder Resist
A
2 X A
PCB
Component
Pad
Solder Resist
Adhesive Solder Resist
Typically 0.003" to 0.005"
Nozzle ID Nozzle Standoff Dot Diameter Range Optimal Dot Diameter
8 5 16-20 18
10 5 18-22 20
12 8 24-35 28
16 10 28-45 35
23 15 40-60+ 45
33 20 50-100+ 60
Figure 7
DOT DIA
Noz
I.D.
Stand
Off Note:
Adhesive dot diameter is approximately 2X
the Inside
Diameter of the nozzle.
Surface Tension of adhesive @ PC Board is 2X area in relationship to inside diameter of nozzle.
Final result is repetition of well defined dot of constant volume.
CorrectRelationship Between Nozzle I.D./ Nozzle Stand-Off/
Adhesive Dot Diameter
Correct adhesive volume dispensed.
DOT DIA
Stand
Off
Noz
I.D.
Note:
Adhesive dot diameter is exceeds the recommended 2X
Nozzle I.D.. Excessive adhesive is forced to migrate
throughout the inside of the outer nozzle stand-off.
IncorrectRelationship Between Nozzle I.D./ Nozzle Stand-Off/
Adhesive Dot Diameter
Incorrectadhesive volume dispensed.
Surface Tension of adhesive @ PC Board is less than the recommended 2X nozzle I.D.
The surface tension of the adhesive @ the nozzle now exceeds that of the board, due to large amount of adhesive build-up inside
nozzle bore. The snap off therefore is inconsistent.
Final result is inconsistent dot volume and poor dot shape. A pattern of large dot, small dot may develop. This occurs because @ every
other dispense there is almost twice the amount of dispensed adhesive @ the nozzle tip.
Stroke
Stroke
Stroke
Stroke
Stroke
This excessive
amount of adhesive
will be added to the
next dispensed dot.
Figure 8
Figure 9
Nozzle Tolerancing and Wear
Since the dot diameter is integrally tied to the nozzle ID and the nozzle standoff, nozzles will vary
slightly in performance due to nozzle tolerancing and nozzle wear. With the repeated force of the
nozzle standoff hitting the PCB the mechanical standoff will wear. The amount of wear seen on
the nozzle depends on the type of solder mask used on the PCB and the type of metal used in
the nozzle construction. It is important to monitor this wear so that the nozzle performance is
optimal. A reduced mechanical standoff will result in a smaller dot diameter range capability.
Low standoffs limit the size of the large dots. As the standoff wears down the adhesive will
contaminate the dispensing tip.
DOTDIA
Stand
Off
Noz
I.D.
Note:
Adhesive dot diameter is smaller than the recommended 2X
Nozzle I.D.. Not enough adhesive will contact the PC board.
Incorrect Relationship Between Nozzle I.D./ Nozzle Stand-Off/
Adhesive Dot Diameter
Incorrect adhesive volume dispensed.
Stroke
Stroke
Stroke
Stroke
Stroke
Surface Tension of adhesive @ PC Board is less than the recommended 2X nozzle I.D..
The surface tension of the adhesive @ the nozzle now exceeds that of the board, due to larger amount of adhesive @ nozzle tip.
This could be due to improper stand-off (To big in this example). Typically this is due to improper stroke setting of pump. (To
short).
This excessive
amount of adhesive
will be added to the
next dispensed dot.
Final result is inconsistent dot volume and poor dot shape. A pattern of large dot, small dot may develop. This occurs because @ every
otherdispense there is almost twice the amount of dispensed adhesive @ the nozzle tip.
Figure 10
Applications at the upper range of the dot diameter from the Figure above are more at risk than
that of the applications using dots within the lower range. As part of the Pre-startup procedure
the nozzle standoff should be measured and compared to the equipment manufactures
specifications. The nozzle ID should also be looked at to make sure that it hasn’t been damaged
during the manufacturing cycle or during cleaning.
Adhesive Between Pads With Solder Paste
In some process applications it is necessary to screen print solder paste onto pads and
dispense adhesive after screening. Dispensing adhesive between pads that have been pasted
can be a difficult process. The nozzle has to be designed so that the standoff doesn’t touch the
pads when dispensing adhesive. As the board density increases this process can be extremely
difficult to find board real-estate which can be utilized for a mechanical standoffs. Knowing or
designing in keep out zones for component circuitry when designing PCB’s can be very helpful
to the equipment manufactures when designing custom nozzles for this application. One sample
of how to figure out where a keep out zone might be is to take a pad design and superimpose
pad locations at 0 and 90 degrees. there is usually four locations nozzle standoffs can be
designed into the process as shown below.
By putting the mechanical standoffs at
one or two locations 45, 135, 215 or 315
degrees around the pad circuitry nozzle
rotation is not necessary for 0 and 90
degree components. One nozzle design
can be utilized for these applications. It
is recommended to use reduced
apertures on the stencil design so that it
reduces the risk of nozzle contamination
with the solder paste.
Pad
@
0
Pad
@
0
Pad @ 90
Pad @ 90
Stand-Off Post (Keep-Out Zone)
X 4
Adhesive Nozzle
Dispense Zone
Figure 11
Another consideration when dispensing adhesive between pads that have had solder paste
applied to them, is the type of adhesive utilized. An adhesive that is formulated to give very
specific rheoligical, or flow properties to allow for a higher profile dot that exhibits very little
slump, should be used in this application. Dots more in the shape of tall cylinders are required
as opposed to the typical triangular hershey kiss dot profile.
PCB
Component
Pad
Solder Paste
Adhesive
PCB
Component
Pad
Solder Paste
Adhesive
0.003" to 0.005"
0.013" to 0.015"
A taller, narrower yet more cylindrical dot is
required in order to provide proper bonding.
Solder Paste On Pads
Figure 12
When printing solder paste and dispensing epoxy between solder pasted pads a specialized
cure cycle is required. Curing epoxy at 150º C is a bondline temperature that should be verified
with thermocouples at various locations. Curing epoxy at temperatures above 160º C can
caaause the adhesive to become brittle, leading to possible component loss during the solder
wave process.
Solution:
The epoxy must be cured at 150º C for about 90 seconds prior to ramping to the reflow temp.
The graph below is a sample of what the cure cycle should look like.
Temperature in C
90 Seconds
150C
Ramp Rate 2C / Sec
RT
Ramp To Reflow
Conclusion
The volume of the dispensed adhesive dot should posses enough wet (green) strength to hold
the passive and active components on the PCB during placement. To much adhesive could lead
to pad contamination causing faulty solder joints and potential clogging of the nozzles on high
speed chip placement machines. Too little adhesive could lead to components falling from the
PCB.
The pad spacing will dictate the volume of adhesive utilized. PCB’s designed for deposition of
adhesive will have adequate space between the pads. PCB’s designed for screen printing of
solder paste will have much less space between the component pads therefore requiring the
need for custom nozzles.
Nozzle selection is dependent on recommended dot diameter and dot height. The ID of the
nozzle generally dictates the volume of adhesive dispensed. The nozzle stand-off will dictate the
height of the dispensed dot.
Special applications such as dispensing adhesive between pads with paste, may require the
use of special designed nozzles.
When all these variables are understood, the process of determining the best fit volume of
adhesive to be dispensed, should be a simple one.
Practical production uses_of_smt_adhesives

More Related Content

What's hot

CalCast Brochure-EN
CalCast Brochure-ENCalCast Brochure-EN
CalCast Brochure-EN
Guido Heuts
 
BGA-Void-Last-Will
BGA-Void-Last-WillBGA-Void-Last-Will
BGA-Void-Last-Will
John Travis
 

What's hot (17)

BGA Rework Process
BGA Rework ProcessBGA Rework Process
BGA Rework Process
 
Low cycle fatigue
Low cycle fatigueLow cycle fatigue
Low cycle fatigue
 
CalCast Brochure-EN
CalCast Brochure-ENCalCast Brochure-EN
CalCast Brochure-EN
 
publication
publicationpublication
publication
 
Working Safely while saving time & cost
Working Safely while saving time & costWorking Safely while saving time & cost
Working Safely while saving time & cost
 
Glamet panel
Glamet panelGlamet panel
Glamet panel
 
SSI Failure Analysis Handbook
SSI Failure Analysis HandbookSSI Failure Analysis Handbook
SSI Failure Analysis Handbook
 
The Effect of Coating and Potting on the Reliability of QFN devices
The Effect of Coating and Potting on the Reliability of QFN devicesThe Effect of Coating and Potting on the Reliability of QFN devices
The Effect of Coating and Potting on the Reliability of QFN devices
 
Advanced pcb materials product selection guide
Advanced pcb materials product selection guideAdvanced pcb materials product selection guide
Advanced pcb materials product selection guide
 
Aggregate testing
Aggregate testing Aggregate testing
Aggregate testing
 
Custom Plastic Pipe Extrusions- Product Catalog
Custom Plastic Pipe Extrusions- Product CatalogCustom Plastic Pipe Extrusions- Product Catalog
Custom Plastic Pipe Extrusions- Product Catalog
 
Elcometer 138 Bresle Salt Kit to level of contaminants on a surface is measur...
Elcometer 138 Bresle Salt Kit to level of contaminants on a surface is measur...Elcometer 138 Bresle Salt Kit to level of contaminants on a surface is measur...
Elcometer 138 Bresle Salt Kit to level of contaminants on a surface is measur...
 
BGA-Void-Last-Will
BGA-Void-Last-WillBGA-Void-Last-Will
BGA-Void-Last-Will
 
BRASS AND Copper Alloy Components By Swati Enterprise
BRASS AND Copper Alloy Components By Swati EnterpriseBRASS AND Copper Alloy Components By Swati Enterprise
BRASS AND Copper Alloy Components By Swati Enterprise
 
Sandvik P&P - Seamless Tubes & Pipes
Sandvik P&P - Seamless Tubes & PipesSandvik P&P - Seamless Tubes & Pipes
Sandvik P&P - Seamless Tubes & Pipes
 
Electrolube, Selector de productos electrolube. Antala Industria.
Electrolube, Selector de productos electrolube. Antala Industria.Electrolube, Selector de productos electrolube. Antala Industria.
Electrolube, Selector de productos electrolube. Antala Industria.
 
A Silicon-to-System Thermo-Mechanical Review of Electronics
A Silicon-to-System Thermo-Mechanical Review of ElectronicsA Silicon-to-System Thermo-Mechanical Review of Electronics
A Silicon-to-System Thermo-Mechanical Review of Electronics
 

Similar to Practical production uses_of_smt_adhesives

Application of Solder Paste
Application of Solder PasteApplication of Solder Paste
Application of Solder Paste
AT&S_IR
 
Surface mounted packages wan007 rev01
Surface mounted packages wan007 rev01Surface mounted packages wan007 rev01
Surface mounted packages wan007 rev01
Dat Tran
 
SMTA 2013 0.3 mm pitch kochanowski rev 6 published
SMTA 2013 0.3 mm pitch kochanowski rev 6 publishedSMTA 2013 0.3 mm pitch kochanowski rev 6 published
SMTA 2013 0.3 mm pitch kochanowski rev 6 published
Michael Kochanowski
 
Mis general specificationcorrugatedcontainerscomponents_en_2010-04-30
Mis general specificationcorrugatedcontainerscomponents_en_2010-04-30Mis general specificationcorrugatedcontainerscomponents_en_2010-04-30
Mis general specificationcorrugatedcontainerscomponents_en_2010-04-30
ucarrasc
 
Basic Design Considerations for Surface Mount Technology
Basic Design Considerations for Surface Mount TechnologyBasic Design Considerations for Surface Mount Technology
Basic Design Considerations for Surface Mount Technology
Hilaire (Ananda) Perera P.Eng.
 
Robust 03015 process RGray apex15
Robust 03015 process RGray apex15Robust 03015 process RGray apex15
Robust 03015 process RGray apex15
Robert Gray
 

Similar to Practical production uses_of_smt_adhesives (20)

Application of Solder Paste
Application of Solder PasteApplication of Solder Paste
Application of Solder Paste
 
Surface mounted packages wan007 rev01
Surface mounted packages wan007 rev01Surface mounted packages wan007 rev01
Surface mounted packages wan007 rev01
 
Fiducial In PCB
Fiducial In PCBFiducial In PCB
Fiducial In PCB
 
Choosing a stencil
Choosing a stencilChoosing a stencil
Choosing a stencil
 
Adhesive backed-mylar-stencils-vs-mini-metal-stencils
Adhesive backed-mylar-stencils-vs-mini-metal-stencilsAdhesive backed-mylar-stencils-vs-mini-metal-stencils
Adhesive backed-mylar-stencils-vs-mini-metal-stencils
 
from intro pages
from intro pagesfrom intro pages
from intro pages
 
Smt panpac paper
Smt panpac paperSmt panpac paper
Smt panpac paper
 
Nano coating solder
Nano coating solderNano coating solder
Nano coating solder
 
SPIROL Spring Alignment Dowels and Bushings Catalog
SPIROL Spring Alignment Dowels and Bushings CatalogSPIROL Spring Alignment Dowels and Bushings Catalog
SPIROL Spring Alignment Dowels and Bushings Catalog
 
SMTA 2013 0.3 mm pitch kochanowski rev 6 published
SMTA 2013 0.3 mm pitch kochanowski rev 6 publishedSMTA 2013 0.3 mm pitch kochanowski rev 6 published
SMTA 2013 0.3 mm pitch kochanowski rev 6 published
 
Designing Optimized Selective Soldering Process for Thru-Hole Aerospace Conne...
Designing Optimized Selective Soldering Process for Thru-Hole Aerospace Conne...Designing Optimized Selective Soldering Process for Thru-Hole Aerospace Conne...
Designing Optimized Selective Soldering Process for Thru-Hole Aerospace Conne...
 
6.09-kochanowski
6.09-kochanowski6.09-kochanowski
6.09-kochanowski
 
Axial Insertion machine tooling design for PCB assembly
Axial Insertion machine tooling design for PCB assemblyAxial Insertion machine tooling design for PCB assembly
Axial Insertion machine tooling design for PCB assembly
 
Mis general specificationcorrugatedcontainerscomponents_en_2010-04-30
Mis general specificationcorrugatedcontainerscomponents_en_2010-04-30Mis general specificationcorrugatedcontainerscomponents_en_2010-04-30
Mis general specificationcorrugatedcontainerscomponents_en_2010-04-30
 
Basic Design Considerations for Surface Mount Technology
Basic Design Considerations for Surface Mount TechnologyBasic Design Considerations for Surface Mount Technology
Basic Design Considerations for Surface Mount Technology
 
Spencer Electroplating Service
Spencer Electroplating ServiceSpencer Electroplating Service
Spencer Electroplating Service
 
Bga land pattern design for manufacturability
Bga land pattern design for manufacturabilityBga land pattern design for manufacturability
Bga land pattern design for manufacturability
 
BGA Land Pattern Design for Manufacturability
BGA Land Pattern Design for ManufacturabilityBGA Land Pattern Design for Manufacturability
BGA Land Pattern Design for Manufacturability
 
Optimal Membrane Switch Design For High Reliability Applications
Optimal Membrane Switch Design For High Reliability ApplicationsOptimal Membrane Switch Design For High Reliability Applications
Optimal Membrane Switch Design For High Reliability Applications
 
Robust 03015 process RGray apex15
Robust 03015 process RGray apex15Robust 03015 process RGray apex15
Robust 03015 process RGray apex15
 

Recently uploaded

Hospital management system project report.pdf
Hospital management system project report.pdfHospital management system project report.pdf
Hospital management system project report.pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
HenryBriggs2
 
Digital Communication Essentials: DPCM, DM, and ADM .pptx
Digital Communication Essentials: DPCM, DM, and ADM .pptxDigital Communication Essentials: DPCM, DM, and ADM .pptx
Digital Communication Essentials: DPCM, DM, and ADM .pptx
pritamlangde
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Max. shear stress theory-Maximum Shear Stress Theory ​ Maximum Distortional ...
Max. shear stress theory-Maximum Shear Stress Theory ​  Maximum Distortional ...Max. shear stress theory-Maximum Shear Stress Theory ​  Maximum Distortional ...
Max. shear stress theory-Maximum Shear Stress Theory ​ Maximum Distortional ...
 
8086 Microprocessor Architecture: 16-bit microprocessor
8086 Microprocessor Architecture: 16-bit microprocessor8086 Microprocessor Architecture: 16-bit microprocessor
8086 Microprocessor Architecture: 16-bit microprocessor
 
Worksharing and 3D Modeling with Revit.pptx
Worksharing and 3D Modeling with Revit.pptxWorksharing and 3D Modeling with Revit.pptx
Worksharing and 3D Modeling with Revit.pptx
 
Signal Processing and Linear System Analysis
Signal Processing and Linear System AnalysisSignal Processing and Linear System Analysis
Signal Processing and Linear System Analysis
 
Introduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
Introduction to Serverless with AWS LambdaIntroduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
Introduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
 
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
 
Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.
 
Computer Graphics Introduction To Curves
Computer Graphics Introduction To CurvesComputer Graphics Introduction To Curves
Computer Graphics Introduction To Curves
 
Hospital management system project report.pdf
Hospital management system project report.pdfHospital management system project report.pdf
Hospital management system project report.pdf
 
fitting shop and tools used in fitting shop .ppt
fitting shop and tools used in fitting shop .pptfitting shop and tools used in fitting shop .ppt
fitting shop and tools used in fitting shop .ppt
 
Introduction to Geographic Information Systems
Introduction to Geographic Information SystemsIntroduction to Geographic Information Systems
Introduction to Geographic Information Systems
 
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
 
School management system project Report.pdf
School management system project Report.pdfSchool management system project Report.pdf
School management system project Report.pdf
 
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence ( AI)
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence ( AI)Introduction to Artificial Intelligence ( AI)
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence ( AI)
 
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the startDesign For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
 
Convergence of Robotics and Gen AI offers excellent opportunities for Entrepr...
Convergence of Robotics and Gen AI offers excellent opportunities for Entrepr...Convergence of Robotics and Gen AI offers excellent opportunities for Entrepr...
Convergence of Robotics and Gen AI offers excellent opportunities for Entrepr...
 
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptxAugmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
 
Computer Networks Basics of Network Devices
Computer Networks  Basics of Network DevicesComputer Networks  Basics of Network Devices
Computer Networks Basics of Network Devices
 
Online electricity billing project report..pdf
Online electricity billing project report..pdfOnline electricity billing project report..pdf
Online electricity billing project report..pdf
 
Digital Communication Essentials: DPCM, DM, and ADM .pptx
Digital Communication Essentials: DPCM, DM, and ADM .pptxDigital Communication Essentials: DPCM, DM, and ADM .pptx
Digital Communication Essentials: DPCM, DM, and ADM .pptx
 

Practical production uses_of_smt_adhesives

  • 1. PRACTICAL PRODUCTION USES OF SMT ADHESIVES By Steven Rocco Marongelli, Douglas Dixon, Sergio Porcari, Wendy Cummings, Frank Murch, Al Osterhout Universal Instruments GDM Product Team PO Box 825 Binghamton, NY USA 13902-0825 607-779-1134 Introduction Adhesives are typically used in surface mount Printed Circuit Board (PCB) assemblies to hold the passive, (and sometimes active), components on to the bottom side of the board during wave soldering. The adhesive is used to bond the surface mount device (SMD) to the PCB, thus forming a joint between the body of the (SMD) and the solder resist or bare FR-4 board between the solder pads. This is necessary to avoid the displacement of components from their sites during high speed placement of passive components. Dispensing equipment must be able to dispense a precise consistent dot shape with different volumes as appropriate for different size devices. After the SMD is placed, the wet adhesive must have sufficient “wet” or “green” strength to hold the SMD in position until cured. Figure 1 The hardening process must be fast and simple. The cured adhesive must then have sufficient strength to hold the SMD to the PCB during the solder wave operation. After soldering the adhesive must not affect operation of the circuit in any way. Generally the spacing between the component pads dictates the maximum allowable adhesive dot diameter that can be dispensed between the pads. Typically the adhesive dot diameter will be 2/3 the pad spacing. Once the allowable adhesive dot diameter has been determined, the appropriate nozzle can be selected. A dual dot nozzle or single dot nozzle should be chosen at this time. PCB Acceptable PCB PCB Unacceptable Pad Contamination Unacceptable Component Bond Area Sufficient Component Bond Area Insufficient
  • 2. Why Dual Dots From time to time the question comes up about why dual dots are sometimes used and sometimes not. The reasons are very logical but rarely stated. Adhesive adheres to a surface in a way that is directly proportional to its area. The amount of adhesive one can put under a component with a single dot is shown in figure 2. This assumes a 3 mil stand off and pad widths matching the component. The mass of each of these common components is also shown in figure 3. The 0805 and larger components are thicker and therefore have more mass. The amount of adhesion area required increases because of the increase in mass. However the space under the component is limited. The Figure 2 relationship between mass and area is shown in figure 3. The 0805 component is the breaking point where the advantage of using dual dots exists but is not strong. The components larger than 0805s require dual dots. In addition to the increased mass these larger components have higher centers of gravity due to the increased thickness. Naturally, the exact point where the area and the green or cured strength balance, depends on the specific adhesive and the G forces of the chip shooter. Nozzle Selection Choosing a nozzle for use in dispensing adhesives requires knowledge of what dot size is required. The dot size requirements can be derived from the board design being utilized or specifically the pad spacing of components. It is not uncommon for Manufacturing Engineer personnel or Quality Engineering personnel of a printed circuit board manufacturing facility, to inquire what a recommended adhesive dot diameter should be for a particular component type. Much has been written in regards to recommended surface mount component pad designs and layouts for bottom side applications. (“Wave Solder”) Top side pad designs are used on bottom side PCB fabrication. However these guidelines are rarely utilized. The pad spacing for a particular component for each individual customer product is unique. Universal’s surface mount laboratory, has recommended component pad spacing guidelines for use when designing printed circuit boards for adhesive application. 0402 (1005) 0603 (1608) 0805 (2012) 1206 (3216) 1210 (3225) Dual Dot Advantage 0 50 100 150 200 0402 0603 0805 1206 1210 Ratio of Force to Area Single Dot Single Dot Dual Dot
  • 3. 0402 0603 0805 1206 1210 A 0.013" 0.020" 0.035" 0.040" 0.060" B 0.025" 0.040" 0.040" 0.070" 0.070" C 0.121" 0.140" 0.140" 0.205" 0.205" D1 0.010"-0.015" 0.020"-0.025" D2 0.020"-0.035" 0.020"-0.035" 0.020"-0.035" E 0.035" 0.035" 0.035" A C B D1 E Recommended Contact Pattern Footprint D2 Table 1 Because the pad spacing for most typical surface mount components is not standardized from one customer product to another, it becomes a challenging task when recommending what tooling should be utilized to satisfy a particular customers adhesive deposition requirement for a particular component. Typically, surface mount component pads for a particular circuit board are designed for either adhesive deposition or screening of solderpaste. (See Figure 4) The pad spacing is generally smaller for solderpaste application as opposed to that of adhesive deposition. For example, the component pad spacing between the pads of an 0603 chip cap/resistor is typically 0.020” if the board was designed to be screen printed with solderpaste. The pad spacing for the same board can be 0.040” if adhesive deposition was intended to be utilized. A 0.030” diameter dot of adhesive would easily be recommended for use if the component pads on the board were indeed designed for adhesive deposition. However, if the pad design for the same board was originally designed for utilization of solderpaste, as a method of adhering the component to the board, obviously an 0.030” diameter dot of adhesive Figure 4 would be too large, as the spacing between the pads is now 0.020”. A 0.040" 0.030" 0603 0603 Typical Wave Solder Pad Layout For 0603 Chip Component Typical Solder Paste Pad Layout For 0603 Chip Component 0603 0603 Typically 0.015" - 0.020" Typically 0.018" - 0.025"
  • 4. 0.015” to 0.018” diameter dot is required for this particular application. Therefore, because all pad design and spacing is not the same from one circuit board to another the actual spacing between the pads of the particular component must be known. Note that the volume of adhesive needed to maintain the component in place during the high speed placement or wave solder process may be larger than possible for some specific pad designs. Nozzle selection refers in this case to specific nozzle specifications for a known dot size requirement. When selecting a nozzle for use in dispensing adhesives, the main parameters needed for correctly determining correct nozzle selection are Nozzle ID, Nozzle Stand-Off, and Dot Diameter. The nozzle standoff can be defined as the distance from the tip of the dispensing surface to the end of the mechanical standoff. The nozzle standoff is used to maintain the distance between the PCB and the dispensing tip. Most dispensers in use today are designed to utilize some sort of mechanical standoff with Figure 5 the nozzles. The stand-off usually dictates, to some degree, the height of the dispensed dot. If the stand-off is too large the adhesive may never contact the board. If this condition exists than the adhesive will build up on the bottom side of the nozzle. Generally this condition leads to poor dot shapes, inconsistent volume, stringing and missing dots. Relationship Of Adhesive Dot Height To Component Height From the Board The distance between the bottom of the component and the top of the PC board is typically between 0.003” to 0.005”. In order to assure a good bond or wetting of the adhesive to the bottom of the component as it is placed onto the PC board, a good rule of thumb is to utilize a dot height that is twice the distance between the bottom of the component and the top of the PC board. Stand Off Noz I.D. PCB
  • 5. Figure 6 Table 2 From table 2 above it can be derived that as the nozzle ID and nozzle standoff decrease the dot diameter range also diminishes. It can also be noted that the recommended standoff for the 8 mil ID nozzle is the same as the 10 mil nozzle. It is recommended not to to go below the 5 mil standoff due to tolerancing of PCB fabrication. Dot diameters smaller than that of a 16 mil dot require special care from board manufacturing. Slight variations of pad heights and solder mask on the PCB add up to large variations in actual mechanical standoff while dispensing. When dispensing dots that require going through nozzles of 8 mils or less the adhesives used and the particle size within the adhesives. Small nozzle ID’s with large particle size will tend to clog more often making for a less than robust manufacturing process. PCB Component Pad Adhesive Solder Resist A 2 X A PCB Component Pad Solder Resist Adhesive Solder Resist Typically 0.003" to 0.005" Nozzle ID Nozzle Standoff Dot Diameter Range Optimal Dot Diameter 8 5 16-20 18 10 5 18-22 20 12 8 24-35 28 16 10 28-45 35 23 15 40-60+ 45 33 20 50-100+ 60
  • 6. Figure 7 DOT DIA Noz I.D. Stand Off Note: Adhesive dot diameter is approximately 2X the Inside Diameter of the nozzle. Surface Tension of adhesive @ PC Board is 2X area in relationship to inside diameter of nozzle. Final result is repetition of well defined dot of constant volume. CorrectRelationship Between Nozzle I.D./ Nozzle Stand-Off/ Adhesive Dot Diameter Correct adhesive volume dispensed. DOT DIA Stand Off Noz I.D. Note: Adhesive dot diameter is exceeds the recommended 2X Nozzle I.D.. Excessive adhesive is forced to migrate throughout the inside of the outer nozzle stand-off. IncorrectRelationship Between Nozzle I.D./ Nozzle Stand-Off/ Adhesive Dot Diameter Incorrectadhesive volume dispensed. Surface Tension of adhesive @ PC Board is less than the recommended 2X nozzle I.D. The surface tension of the adhesive @ the nozzle now exceeds that of the board, due to large amount of adhesive build-up inside nozzle bore. The snap off therefore is inconsistent. Final result is inconsistent dot volume and poor dot shape. A pattern of large dot, small dot may develop. This occurs because @ every other dispense there is almost twice the amount of dispensed adhesive @ the nozzle tip. Stroke Stroke Stroke Stroke Stroke This excessive amount of adhesive will be added to the next dispensed dot.
  • 7. Figure 8 Figure 9 Nozzle Tolerancing and Wear Since the dot diameter is integrally tied to the nozzle ID and the nozzle standoff, nozzles will vary slightly in performance due to nozzle tolerancing and nozzle wear. With the repeated force of the nozzle standoff hitting the PCB the mechanical standoff will wear. The amount of wear seen on the nozzle depends on the type of solder mask used on the PCB and the type of metal used in the nozzle construction. It is important to monitor this wear so that the nozzle performance is optimal. A reduced mechanical standoff will result in a smaller dot diameter range capability. Low standoffs limit the size of the large dots. As the standoff wears down the adhesive will contaminate the dispensing tip. DOTDIA Stand Off Noz I.D. Note: Adhesive dot diameter is smaller than the recommended 2X Nozzle I.D.. Not enough adhesive will contact the PC board. Incorrect Relationship Between Nozzle I.D./ Nozzle Stand-Off/ Adhesive Dot Diameter Incorrect adhesive volume dispensed. Stroke Stroke Stroke Stroke Stroke Surface Tension of adhesive @ PC Board is less than the recommended 2X nozzle I.D.. The surface tension of the adhesive @ the nozzle now exceeds that of the board, due to larger amount of adhesive @ nozzle tip. This could be due to improper stand-off (To big in this example). Typically this is due to improper stroke setting of pump. (To short). This excessive amount of adhesive will be added to the next dispensed dot. Final result is inconsistent dot volume and poor dot shape. A pattern of large dot, small dot may develop. This occurs because @ every otherdispense there is almost twice the amount of dispensed adhesive @ the nozzle tip.
  • 8. Figure 10 Applications at the upper range of the dot diameter from the Figure above are more at risk than that of the applications using dots within the lower range. As part of the Pre-startup procedure the nozzle standoff should be measured and compared to the equipment manufactures specifications. The nozzle ID should also be looked at to make sure that it hasn’t been damaged during the manufacturing cycle or during cleaning. Adhesive Between Pads With Solder Paste In some process applications it is necessary to screen print solder paste onto pads and dispense adhesive after screening. Dispensing adhesive between pads that have been pasted can be a difficult process. The nozzle has to be designed so that the standoff doesn’t touch the pads when dispensing adhesive. As the board density increases this process can be extremely difficult to find board real-estate which can be utilized for a mechanical standoffs. Knowing or designing in keep out zones for component circuitry when designing PCB’s can be very helpful to the equipment manufactures when designing custom nozzles for this application. One sample of how to figure out where a keep out zone might be is to take a pad design and superimpose pad locations at 0 and 90 degrees. there is usually four locations nozzle standoffs can be designed into the process as shown below. By putting the mechanical standoffs at one or two locations 45, 135, 215 or 315 degrees around the pad circuitry nozzle rotation is not necessary for 0 and 90 degree components. One nozzle design can be utilized for these applications. It is recommended to use reduced apertures on the stencil design so that it reduces the risk of nozzle contamination with the solder paste. Pad @ 0 Pad @ 0 Pad @ 90 Pad @ 90 Stand-Off Post (Keep-Out Zone) X 4 Adhesive Nozzle Dispense Zone
  • 9. Figure 11 Another consideration when dispensing adhesive between pads that have had solder paste applied to them, is the type of adhesive utilized. An adhesive that is formulated to give very specific rheoligical, or flow properties to allow for a higher profile dot that exhibits very little slump, should be used in this application. Dots more in the shape of tall cylinders are required as opposed to the typical triangular hershey kiss dot profile. PCB Component Pad Solder Paste Adhesive PCB Component Pad Solder Paste Adhesive 0.003" to 0.005" 0.013" to 0.015" A taller, narrower yet more cylindrical dot is required in order to provide proper bonding. Solder Paste On Pads Figure 12 When printing solder paste and dispensing epoxy between solder pasted pads a specialized cure cycle is required. Curing epoxy at 150º C is a bondline temperature that should be verified with thermocouples at various locations. Curing epoxy at temperatures above 160º C can caaause the adhesive to become brittle, leading to possible component loss during the solder wave process. Solution: The epoxy must be cured at 150º C for about 90 seconds prior to ramping to the reflow temp. The graph below is a sample of what the cure cycle should look like.
  • 10. Temperature in C 90 Seconds 150C Ramp Rate 2C / Sec RT Ramp To Reflow Conclusion The volume of the dispensed adhesive dot should posses enough wet (green) strength to hold the passive and active components on the PCB during placement. To much adhesive could lead to pad contamination causing faulty solder joints and potential clogging of the nozzles on high speed chip placement machines. Too little adhesive could lead to components falling from the PCB. The pad spacing will dictate the volume of adhesive utilized. PCB’s designed for deposition of adhesive will have adequate space between the pads. PCB’s designed for screen printing of solder paste will have much less space between the component pads therefore requiring the need for custom nozzles. Nozzle selection is dependent on recommended dot diameter and dot height. The ID of the nozzle generally dictates the volume of adhesive dispensed. The nozzle stand-off will dictate the height of the dispensed dot. Special applications such as dispensing adhesive between pads with paste, may require the use of special designed nozzles. When all these variables are understood, the process of determining the best fit volume of adhesive to be dispensed, should be a simple one.