SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Balloons Aloha
Bill Ajaero
Vickie Cooper
Aly Georgiu
The Case
• Susie Davis owns a company called Balloons Aloha and are in need
to fill balloons with helium and assembling them into certain
configurations for six major parties. Since all of her customer jobs
need to use the same helium tank Susie is trying to determine what
would be the best single way to process the jobs. (Collier & Evans,
2014)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zr-NlIFsg0&feature=youtu.be
The job processing time estimates
are:
Jobs 1 2 3 4 5 6
Processing time (min.) 240 130 210 90 170 165
Due date (6 a.m. to
midnight in minutes from
opening)
240 360 480 240 720 780
Case Questions for Discussion
• Compute the average flow time, lateness, and tardiness for
this group of jobs using Mr. Sailboat’s sequential order of 1
(first), 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (last).
• In what order would the jobs be processed using the SPT rule?
Compute the average flow time, lateness, and tardiness for
this group of jobs.
• Compare he answers in Questions 1 and 2.
• What are your short-term recommendations for this set of six
jobs? Justify. Explain.
• What are your long-term recommendations with respect to a
sequencing jobs at Balloons Aloha? Justify. Explain.
Mr.Sailboat’ssequentialorderof1
(first),2,3,4,5,6(last):
Job Flow Time (F) Due Date Lateness (L = C – D) Tardiness [Max (0, L)]
1 240 240 0 0
2 240 + 130 = 370 360 10 10
3 370 + 210 = 580 480 100 100
4 580 + 90 = 670 240 430 430
5 670 + 170 = 840 720 120 120
6 840 + 165 = 1005 780 225 555
Averages 3705/6 = 617.5 min. 880/6 = 146.667 min. 1215/6 = 202.5 min.
Processing jobs using SPT rule:
SPT means shortest processing time. The rule allows jobs to
be processed by the shortest possible time each job is likely
to spend in process. So, applying this rule, the jobs will be
processed in the order: 4, 2, 6, 5, 3 and 1
Averageflowtime,latenessandtardinessinSPT
order
Job Flow Time (F) Due Date Lateness (L = C – D) Tardiness [Max (0, L)]
4 90 240 -150 0
2 90 + 130 = 220 360 -140 0
6 220 + 165 = 385 780 -395 0
5 385 + 170 = 555 720 -165 0
3 555 + 210 = 765 480 285 285
1 765 + 240 = 1005 240 765 765
Averages 3020/6 = 503.333 min. 200/6 = 33.33 min 1050/6 = 175 min
Comparinganswersinquestions1&2
Averages
Mr. Sailboat’s sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 SPT Order 4, 2, 6, 5, 3, 1
Flow Time 617.5 min. 503.333 min.
Lateness 146.667 min. 33.33 min.
Tardiness 202.5 min. 175 min.
From the comparison above, we can conclude that the SPT
order is more efficient saving business time and cost, and
increasing overall revenue.
Recommendations
• Adopt the SPT rule for single-resource sequencing
problems;
EDD rule: • An examination of the alternative to SPT
which is the Earliest Due Date rule (EDD) will
possibly reinforce our recommendation of
the SPT rule for single-resource sequencing
problems
Jobs Flow Time (F) Due Date Lateness (L = C – D) Tardiness [Max (0, L)]
1 240 240 0 0
4 240 + 90 = 330 240 90 90
2 330 + 130 = 460 360 100 100
3 460 + 210 = 670 480 190 190
5 670 + 170 = 840 720 120 120
6 840 + 165 = 1005 780 225 225
Averages 3545/6 = 590.833
min.
725/6 = 120.833 min. 725/6 = 120.833 min.
Conclusion
For all three performance criteria (Flow Time, Lateness,
Tardiness) using EDD, the averages are much higher than
they would be using SPT rule. So, as mentioned above, the
efficiency in the SPT rule is time saving, reduces cost and
adds to overall business revenue growth.

More Related Content

What's hot

Aggregate Planning Problem
Aggregate Planning ProblemAggregate Planning Problem
Aggregate Planning Problem
Joseph Konnully
 
Process strategy
Process strategyProcess strategy
Process strategy
Moezza A
 
COMPARISON of AVT VERSUS OT
COMPARISON of AVT VERSUS OTCOMPARISON of AVT VERSUS OT
COMPARISON of AVT VERSUS OT
Erwan Yulianto
 

What's hot (20)

Line balancing & EOQ
Line balancing & EOQLine balancing & EOQ
Line balancing & EOQ
 
PROCESS,REPITATIVE,PRODUCT,MASS STRATEGY
PROCESS,REPITATIVE,PRODUCT,MASS STRATEGYPROCESS,REPITATIVE,PRODUCT,MASS STRATEGY
PROCESS,REPITATIVE,PRODUCT,MASS STRATEGY
 
Line balancing
Line balancingLine balancing
Line balancing
 
Aggregate Planning Problem
Aggregate Planning ProblemAggregate Planning Problem
Aggregate Planning Problem
 
Line balancing and heuristics
Line balancing and heuristicsLine balancing and heuristics
Line balancing and heuristics
 
Process strategy
Process strategyProcess strategy
Process strategy
 
5S TRAINING PPT.pptx
5S TRAINING PPT.pptx5S TRAINING PPT.pptx
5S TRAINING PPT.pptx
 
Just In Time and Lean Operation Chapter Presentation
Just In Time and Lean Operation Chapter PresentationJust In Time and Lean Operation Chapter Presentation
Just In Time and Lean Operation Chapter Presentation
 
Plant Layout Algorithm
Plant Layout AlgorithmPlant Layout Algorithm
Plant Layout Algorithm
 
Line balancing
Line balancingLine balancing
Line balancing
 
Effective Spare Parts Management - 8 rules
Effective Spare Parts Management - 8 rulesEffective Spare Parts Management - 8 rules
Effective Spare Parts Management - 8 rules
 
COMPARISON of AVT VERSUS OT
COMPARISON of AVT VERSUS OTCOMPARISON of AVT VERSUS OT
COMPARISON of AVT VERSUS OT
 
Obeya: an evolution by Fred Mathijssen Nike - Lean IT Summit 2014
Obeya: an evolution by Fred Mathijssen Nike - Lean IT Summit 2014Obeya: an evolution by Fred Mathijssen Nike - Lean IT Summit 2014
Obeya: an evolution by Fred Mathijssen Nike - Lean IT Summit 2014
 
Plant Maintenance
Plant MaintenancePlant Maintenance
Plant Maintenance
 
thermal-fluid-systems
thermal-fluid-systemsthermal-fluid-systems
thermal-fluid-systems
 
Exploring the 4-Day Work Week
Exploring the 4-Day Work WeekExploring the 4-Day Work Week
Exploring the 4-Day Work Week
 
Ch11pp
Ch11ppCh11pp
Ch11pp
 
2007 Introduction MEOST
2007 Introduction MEOST2007 Introduction MEOST
2007 Introduction MEOST
 
Basic of work study
Basic of work studyBasic of work study
Basic of work study
 
Lean thinking
Lean thinkingLean thinking
Lean thinking
 

Similar to MBA 550 - Balloons Aloha v.01

SBS - SMED Training (Set Up Reduction)
SBS - SMED Training (Set Up Reduction)SBS - SMED Training (Set Up Reduction)
SBS - SMED Training (Set Up Reduction)
Chris Cummins
 
Aminullah Assagaf_P7-Ch.9_Project management-32.pptx
Aminullah Assagaf_P7-Ch.9_Project management-32.pptxAminullah Assagaf_P7-Ch.9_Project management-32.pptx
Aminullah Assagaf_P7-Ch.9_Project management-32.pptx
Aminullah Assagaf
 

Similar to MBA 550 - Balloons Aloha v.01 (20)

Line Balancing In Garments Industry
Line Balancing In Garments IndustryLine Balancing In Garments Industry
Line Balancing In Garments Industry
 
Project crashing and job sequencing
Project crashing and job sequencingProject crashing and job sequencing
Project crashing and job sequencing
 
A line in apparel
A line in apparelA line in apparel
A line in apparel
 
Operations Research_18ME735_module 5 sequencing notes.pdf
Operations Research_18ME735_module 5 sequencing notes.pdfOperations Research_18ME735_module 5 sequencing notes.pdf
Operations Research_18ME735_module 5 sequencing notes.pdf
 
operations scheduling
operations schedulingoperations scheduling
operations scheduling
 
Log11 uitwerking opdrachten
Log11 uitwerking opdrachtenLog11 uitwerking opdrachten
Log11 uitwerking opdrachten
 
shortest job first
shortest job firstshortest job first
shortest job first
 
Lean Manufacturing Project
Lean Manufacturing ProjectLean Manufacturing Project
Lean Manufacturing Project
 
OEE
OEEOEE
OEE
 
Cpu scheduling algorithm on windows
Cpu scheduling algorithm on windowsCpu scheduling algorithm on windows
Cpu scheduling algorithm on windows
 
Toc Education
Toc EducationToc Education
Toc Education
 
SBS - SMED Training (Set Up Reduction)
SBS - SMED Training (Set Up Reduction)SBS - SMED Training (Set Up Reduction)
SBS - SMED Training (Set Up Reduction)
 
CPU Scheduling
CPU SchedulingCPU Scheduling
CPU Scheduling
 
Assembly Line Balancing
Assembly Line BalancingAssembly Line Balancing
Assembly Line Balancing
 
AWR & ASH Analysis
AWR & ASH AnalysisAWR & ASH Analysis
AWR & ASH Analysis
 
crashing of project
crashing of project crashing of project
crashing of project
 
#ITsubbotnik Spring 2017: Mikhail Khludnev "Search like %SQL%"
#ITsubbotnik Spring 2017: Mikhail Khludnev "Search like %SQL%"#ITsubbotnik Spring 2017: Mikhail Khludnev "Search like %SQL%"
#ITsubbotnik Spring 2017: Mikhail Khludnev "Search like %SQL%"
 
CPU Scheduling.pdf
CPU Scheduling.pdfCPU Scheduling.pdf
CPU Scheduling.pdf
 
Simulated annealing
Simulated annealingSimulated annealing
Simulated annealing
 
Aminullah Assagaf_P7-Ch.9_Project management-32.pptx
Aminullah Assagaf_P7-Ch.9_Project management-32.pptxAminullah Assagaf_P7-Ch.9_Project management-32.pptx
Aminullah Assagaf_P7-Ch.9_Project management-32.pptx
 

MBA 550 - Balloons Aloha v.01

  • 2. The Case • Susie Davis owns a company called Balloons Aloha and are in need to fill balloons with helium and assembling them into certain configurations for six major parties. Since all of her customer jobs need to use the same helium tank Susie is trying to determine what would be the best single way to process the jobs. (Collier & Evans, 2014) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zr-NlIFsg0&feature=youtu.be
  • 3. The job processing time estimates are: Jobs 1 2 3 4 5 6 Processing time (min.) 240 130 210 90 170 165 Due date (6 a.m. to midnight in minutes from opening) 240 360 480 240 720 780
  • 4. Case Questions for Discussion • Compute the average flow time, lateness, and tardiness for this group of jobs using Mr. Sailboat’s sequential order of 1 (first), 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (last). • In what order would the jobs be processed using the SPT rule? Compute the average flow time, lateness, and tardiness for this group of jobs. • Compare he answers in Questions 1 and 2. • What are your short-term recommendations for this set of six jobs? Justify. Explain. • What are your long-term recommendations with respect to a sequencing jobs at Balloons Aloha? Justify. Explain.
  • 5. Mr.Sailboat’ssequentialorderof1 (first),2,3,4,5,6(last): Job Flow Time (F) Due Date Lateness (L = C – D) Tardiness [Max (0, L)] 1 240 240 0 0 2 240 + 130 = 370 360 10 10 3 370 + 210 = 580 480 100 100 4 580 + 90 = 670 240 430 430 5 670 + 170 = 840 720 120 120 6 840 + 165 = 1005 780 225 555 Averages 3705/6 = 617.5 min. 880/6 = 146.667 min. 1215/6 = 202.5 min.
  • 6. Processing jobs using SPT rule: SPT means shortest processing time. The rule allows jobs to be processed by the shortest possible time each job is likely to spend in process. So, applying this rule, the jobs will be processed in the order: 4, 2, 6, 5, 3 and 1
  • 7. Averageflowtime,latenessandtardinessinSPT order Job Flow Time (F) Due Date Lateness (L = C – D) Tardiness [Max (0, L)] 4 90 240 -150 0 2 90 + 130 = 220 360 -140 0 6 220 + 165 = 385 780 -395 0 5 385 + 170 = 555 720 -165 0 3 555 + 210 = 765 480 285 285 1 765 + 240 = 1005 240 765 765 Averages 3020/6 = 503.333 min. 200/6 = 33.33 min 1050/6 = 175 min
  • 8. Comparinganswersinquestions1&2 Averages Mr. Sailboat’s sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 SPT Order 4, 2, 6, 5, 3, 1 Flow Time 617.5 min. 503.333 min. Lateness 146.667 min. 33.33 min. Tardiness 202.5 min. 175 min. From the comparison above, we can conclude that the SPT order is more efficient saving business time and cost, and increasing overall revenue.
  • 9. Recommendations • Adopt the SPT rule for single-resource sequencing problems;
  • 10. EDD rule: • An examination of the alternative to SPT which is the Earliest Due Date rule (EDD) will possibly reinforce our recommendation of the SPT rule for single-resource sequencing problems Jobs Flow Time (F) Due Date Lateness (L = C – D) Tardiness [Max (0, L)] 1 240 240 0 0 4 240 + 90 = 330 240 90 90 2 330 + 130 = 460 360 100 100 3 460 + 210 = 670 480 190 190 5 670 + 170 = 840 720 120 120 6 840 + 165 = 1005 780 225 225 Averages 3545/6 = 590.833 min. 725/6 = 120.833 min. 725/6 = 120.833 min.
  • 11. Conclusion For all three performance criteria (Flow Time, Lateness, Tardiness) using EDD, the averages are much higher than they would be using SPT rule. So, as mentioned above, the efficiency in the SPT rule is time saving, reduces cost and adds to overall business revenue growth.