The document discusses lean implementation efforts at a production cell that manufactures connectors. It outlines the challenges of reducing lead time by 60%, work in progress by 70%, and other metrics. Process analysis was conducted including value stream mapping. Opportunities were identified and prioritized. Changes implemented included layout redesign, standard work, visual management boards, and focused improvement teams. Lessons from kaizen events were documented. The lean transformation efforts showed improvements across key metrics and engaged the team.
4. TELEPHONE DIALING CHANGE:
1. 8 4537 Our Grand Mother’s environment
2. 38 4537 Our Mother’s environment
3. 338 4537 Our Time
4. 4338 4537 Our son’s time
5. TELEPHONE DIALING CHANGE:
1. 8 4537 Our Grand Mother’s environment
2. 38 4537 Our Mother’s environment
3. 338 4537 Our Time
4. 4338 4537 Our son’s time
5. 011 4338 4537 If your son lived in SP and you in
Rio
6. 021 11 4338 4537 you are as old as your
Granma !
6. TELEPHONE DIALING CHANGE:
1. 8 4537 Our Grand Mother’s environment
2. 38 4537 Our Mother’s environment
3. 338 4537 Our Time
4. 4338 4537 Our son’s time
5. 011 4338 4537 If your son lived in SP and you in
Rio
6. 021 11 4338 4537 you are as old as your
Granma !
7. 021 11 9 4338 4537 rest in peace …
7. Debugging Lean (Harvard Review Papers)
• Clear binomial communication …Yes or No
• All the flows need to be the more direct possible
• From the top up to the lower level of organization
• Kaizen (Continuous improvement)
4 points !!!
10. Visual Management : KPI
DASHBOARDS
Standardization & Kaizen
Robust Government Process
Standardization & Kaizen
Safety
Quality
Delivery
Cost
Moral
JPS – Jandira Production System
14. Defining the Objectives:
• 60% of Lead time reduction
• Reduce walking distance in 50%
• Reduce WIP in 70%
• Reduce waiting time in 70%
•Reduce area utilization in 60 %
• Housekeeping Improvement
• Visual management implementation
• EHS/Ergonomic improvement
15. Target Sheet
Metrics UOM % Start Target FW 43 FW 44 FW 45 FW 46 FW 47 FW 48 FW 49 FW 50 FW 51
Part Walking Distance Reduction meters 50% 205 102.5 - 48 48 48 48
Lead Time Reduction hours 60% 177.00 70.80 - 10.00 6.85 6.85 6.85
% AV Time % - 51% 70% - 90% 90% 90%
WIPReduction (20'') units 70% 100 30 - 54 38 7 4
WIPReduction (30'') units 70% 17 5 - NA NA 6 4
Waiting time reduction hours 70% 168 50.4 - 2 0.7 0.7 0.7
Space Utilization meters 60% 179.2 71.68 - 49 50 50 50
Production Capacity Increase 20'' parts/day 50% 4 6 - 9 9 9 9
30''InProgress
30''InProgress
36''InCert.
36''InCert.
Defining the challenge
21. VSM Action Plan… 58 opportunities
Priorities in gain & effort Matrix
22. FW 41 VSM
AV
9 hours
(5.08%)
NAV
168 hours
(94.92%)
Lead Time 177 hours
20’’ 30’’ TOTA
L
WIP
(parts)
100 17 117
23. FW 44 VSM
20” Connectors
FW 41 FW 44
AV* 9 h 6.13 h
NAV* 168 h 0.72 h
Lead Time* 177 h 6.85 h
WIP*
100 (20’’) / 17
(30’’)
38
(20’’)
Source: Measured with a conventional
chronometer
5%
95%
FW 41
89%
11%
FW 44
*Time in hours
WIP in parts
Lead Time Reduction: 96.1%
24. 0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
TT vs CT
CT = 1
h
CT = 3 h
CT = 1 h
CT = 0,5 h
CT = 1,5 h
CT = 4 h
TT = 2,2 h
FW 41 TT & CT Diagram
3
Operators
3 Shifts
Crane
1 Operator
1 Shift
Crane
3
Operators
3 Shifts
Crane
1/2 Operators
2 Shifts
1 Operator
1 Shift
1/2
Operators
2 Shifts
Crane
25. 0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
TT vs CT
CT = 0.25 h CT = 0.42 h
CT = 1.25 h
CT = 1 h
CT = 0.5 h
CT = 2,5 h
1/0.5 Operators
2 Shifts
TT = 2,2 h
FW 44 and onwards …TT & CT Diagram
3
Operators
3 Shifts
Crane
1 Operator
1 Shift
Crane
3
Operators
3 Shifts
0.5 Operators
2 Shifts
1 Operator
1 Shift
1/0.5 Operators
2 Shifts
Crane
CT = 1.5 h
26. 0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
TT vs CT
CT = 0.25 h CT = 0.08 h
CT = 0.83 h CT = 1 h
CT = 0.5 h
1/0.5 Operators
2 Shifts
CT = 1.5 h
TT = 2.2 h
FW 49 and onwards …TT & CT Diagram
3
Operators
3 Shifts
Crane
1 Operator
1 Shift
Crane
3
Operators
3 Shifts
0.5 Operators
2 Shifts
1 Operator
1 Shift
1/0.5 Operators
2 Shifts
Crane
New TT = 1,5 h
15 min 15 min
50 min
CT = 1.5 h
QC TIME was considered measuring 2 parts with the same setup
32. A1
A2
Wotan VI
A4
A1 = 73,4 m²
A2 = 16,8 m²
A3 = 24 m²
A4 = 50 m²
A5 = 15 m²
A5
A3
179.2 m²
A*
A* = 49 m² 73 % less
Area Utilization Before / After
35. Fotos
Projeto Nr. 2012-11-0004
Antes Depois
Titulo: Teste Funcional com Caixa e Pino CelAcessórios
Fotos
Risco ergonômico alto, mal
posicionamento da peça, irregularidade
na montagem das partes, sujeito a
danificar a rosca.
O dispositivo foi deselvolvido para facilitar
a montagem e o teste funcional, sem
esforços , perigos de deformações das
roscas.
Resumo Geral mês Antes Depois
Tempo ( h ) 350
op/mês
horas/mês 0 horas
Custo ( R$)
Quantidade ano (un)
Save Total ano ( R$) R$ R$ 0
Produtividade (CT) x
Desperdício (LT)
Qualidade x
Housekeeping x
EHS x
Bullet Train (R$)
Impacto ao OTD
AWO
Impacto
Francine / Eduardo e Bob - Montagem
42. ALIGNMENT DISCUSSIONS
REQUIRED
1. PCP frequent meetings for sharing
the objectives (Cell & Victor’s team &
Macaé)
2. Engineers meeting for alignment on
the new lay outs initiatives