Downloaded 16 times
Uploaded byORCID, Inc
Kiermer outreach oct2013
The document discusses the integration of ORCID identifiers by publishers, highlighting the benefits for both publishers and authors, including improved user account disambiguation and streamlined registration processes. It also addresses the implementation challenges and the current adoption statistics of ORCID at Nature Publishing Group. Future plans for ORCID integration include automating updates and enhancing author incentives, though there is no current mandate for authors to register for an ORCID.
More Related Content
Similar to Kiermer outreach oct2013
Kiermer outreach oct2013
- 1. Integration of ORCIDidentifiers by publishers Véronique Kiermer, PhD Executive Editor Head of Researchers Services Nature Publishing Group ORCID Outreach Meeting October 2013
- 2. Credits • Howard Ratner,CHORUS • Tara Packer, Head of Authors & Referees Services, NPG • Mark Henry, Vrushali Potdar, Ingrid McNamara, Rebecca Barr, Alex Kotin
- 3. NPG facilitates ORCIDregistration at two touch points Journal website Readers, Subscribers, Commenters Manuscript tracking system Authors, Referees
- 4. Benefits to publishers • • • • disambiguationof user accounts cross-talk between multiple internal systems richer connections on the website service to authors
- 5.
- 6. ORCID: Authentication -set up NPG as trusted entity
- 7. ORCID information prepopulatesNPG registration form In NPG systems: - a given ORCID can only be linked to one account - only one ORCID per account - user authenticate once then ORCID is shared with their other accounts in other NPG systems
- 8. Upon manuscript submission Authenticateto ORCID to create an identifier or link an existing identifier Set up NPG as trusted entity ORCID information pre-populates author information in submission form ORCID becomes associated with eJP account
- 10. Searching NPG databaseby ORCID
- 11.
- 12. Export from eJPto production tracking system
- 13.
- 14.
- 15. Link from articleto ORCID record • In future: update of ORCID record upon publication • NPG already sends ORCID-doi association to CrossRef and indexers • In future, CrossRef will be able to push information to ORCID
- 16.
- 17. Publishers implementation challenges •O Auth protocol implementation • ensuring that ORCIDs remain unique • dealing with multiple vendors during production • manual integration in XML • proofing challenges • correction policy
- 18. Stats • Traffic referralto ORCID from NPG systems: 3,000 visitors/month (~2,500 unique visitors) • ORCID creation: ~1,000 /month • September: 1,735 authorizations; 25 access denied Since launch at NPG (1 year): • 4500 user accounts in manuscript tracking system with ORCIDs • 4166 user accounts in nature.com with ORCIDs
- 19. An ORCID mandatefor all authors? • we currently do not mandate ORCIDs • we may consider mandating ORCID for corresponding authors/submitters but NOT for co-authors • we need strong incentives for authors to make them link an ORCID to their paper • requires the whole ecosystem to work in coordinated fashion
- 20. Two options toencourage adoption Contact co-authors Submitter enters ORCIDs instead of Authors details • Publisher collects min information about coauthors from submitter: name, email • Publisher contacts all coauthors during manuscript consideration – asking them to register for an ORCID • Benefits to authors? • Publisher queries ORCID and returns prepopulated field for submitter to validate • Need email and affiliation from ORCID
- 21. Incentives for authors •“Make my life easier when I submit a paper” – remove the need to key in my up-to-date personal information – remove the need for me to enter my co-authors information • “Help me manage my online presence and reporting needs” – my ORCID profile is automatically updated upon publication of a new article – my other profiles read from ORCID – my publisher knows my obligations to my funder (ms deposition)
- 22. Potential future services •facilitate manuscript submission • automate deposition of manuscripts in relevant repositories • better recommendations to readers • commenting notification • micro-attribution, better credit for all contributions
- 23.
Editor's Notes
- #5 users have accounts in multiple journals, authors have moved and recreated accounts with new affiliation, etccross talk between website and MTS: (1) readers who are also authors/referees(2) in order to comment, you need to register – possibility to contact authorsconnections on the website: better recommendations to users if one can identify their preferences unambiguously, links between co-authors, notification of authors that comments on papers, etcservice to authors – (1) provide them with full and unambiguous credit for their contributions in our journals(2) develop services that rely on authors identity
- #11 At the moment, we are not yet able to search ORCID at this point ORCID cannot be associated with account if not authenticatedAPI wiork not integrateduseful for staffwill be useful for batch upload
- #12 Export into production: tracking system generates an XML file with ORCIDsTypesetters: XML files is sent to typesetters – who MANUALLY add the XML ORCID tags to the article XMLWeb production
- #17 Export into production: tracking system generates an XML file with ORCIDsTypesetters: XML files is sent to typesetters – who MANUALLY add the XML ORCID tags to the article XMLWeb production
- #18 Oauth implementation is that it is time consuming. There is a big learning curve, it is complex, there are multiple security issues to deal with to make sure you're safely authenticating across the open internet (by using appropriate protocols, encryption, firewalls, client authentication, etc).
- #19 ORCID creation per month: averaging 500/month in eJP – steady growth but only <10% submissions