3. Adaptation Planning
Model Forest Policy Program’s Climate Solutions
University
Adaptation vs. mitigation
Planning team
CAC Members: Jean Shaffer, Fred Michelson, Phyllis
Farrell
Mount Rainier Nat’l Park: Roger Andrascik
JBLM: Nate Waldren
4.
5. Nisqually Watershed
239,000 acres of
forestland
59,000 acres JBLM
39,900 acres Parks
80% of mainstem
protected
$287 million - $4.1 billion
in Ecosystem Services
80,000+ residents
43,000 water users in
Olympia
41,000 homes powered
in Tacoma
Threatened/endangered
species
20,000+ people
expected by 2020s
6. Nisqually Community
Nisqually Tribe – sustenance, culture, economy
Timber economy – 11% of Lewis County private
employment (0.6% nationally)
Homeowners – Wildland Urban Interface;
floodplains
7. Forest resources
Land-use conversion + expanded development + high
impact forest management =
Loss of canopy
Decreased carbon sequestration
Degraded ecosystem services
Increased WUI areas
8. Forests & climate change
Warmer air + changing precipitation =
longer dry seasons & wetter winters
Increased drought stress
Increase in natural disturbances - fire, insect & disease
outbreaks (+ invasive species)
Shifts in species habitat –
80% loss of subalpine by 2080
9. Water resources
Restoration efforts underway = high baseline
Drinking water, agricultural uses,
hydroelectricity, salmon habitat, recreation,
aesthetics…
Surface water & aquifers
20,000+ people expected by 2020s
11. Goals for resiliency
Restore and maintain forest cover that is healthy, resilient and
widespread so that it provides cultural, recreational, ecological and
economic benefits
Maintain healthy freshwater ecosystems support thriving native fish
populations while providing cultural, economic and social benefits
Promote adaptation in the river delta environment by restoring it to a
fully functioning ecosystem that is resilient to changing conditions and
provides cultural, social, ecological and economic benefits
Provide sustainable funding and strong, engaged partnerships in order
to successfully implement climate adaptation activities
12. Mechanisms of adaptation
Planning
Include climate language in guiding documents – NWSP
Prepare for changing fire regimes & increased winter
flooding
Policy
Update plans, regulations to include climate projections
Increase resiliency in WUI and floodplain developments
Monitoring
Establish/continue watershed-wide forest and water
monitoring
Annual adaptive management review
13. Mechanisms of adaptation
On-the-ground Actions
Restore tree canopy, especially in areas with snowpack
Continue to restore riparian areas
Reduce storm water runoff & increase tree cover in
developed areas
Education/Outreach
Work with citizen scientists to include climate change
Citizen scientists & community forest?
Urban center connections: importance of healthy headwaters
Payment for ecosystem services?
14. Implementation
Climate change is happening now. Adaptation efforts will
increase resiliency in forest & water resources; local
economies
December RFP
CSU Implementation Program
NRC Input:
Finalize action plan
Update NWSP
Include climate projections in current projects?
Hello everyone! I’d like to take this time to give you an overview of the climate adaptation planning process I’ve been working on since February of this year. I’m excited to announce that the planning portion is almost over, and that implementation will begin soon!
Here’s a quick overview of today’s talk. I’ll start by speaking a little bit about the adaptation planning process, and then will go into the meat of what we discovered during the course of the planning year. I’ll end with some suggestions on adaptation activities and a look at what’s next.
This year, the NRF was a part of the MFPP’s CSU program. CSU is a virtual distance-learning course that helps communities research climate impacts and develop community based solutions in fostering resiliency. This year, Nisqually was one of 5 communities that participated in the program.
It’s also important to understand what adaptation is. Mitigation is very important—it’s the process of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and slowing the process of climate change. However, climate change is happening now and many impacts are already being felt. So, adaptation activities works to minimize the consequences of climate change today.
I’d like to give a special thanks to the planning team. We had many people involved in the planning process, but Jean, Fred, Roger, Phyllis and Nate Waldren from JBLM were deeply involved from the start. They attended all the planning meetings, reviewed the plan, and helped me pull it all together.
Most of you are very familiar with the Nisqually Watershed, but I want to give a little bit of background information in the context of planning for climate adaptation. To start, we are very lucky to have a relatively healthy watershed. The amount of protected land – both private and public – is huge, and the number of restoration initiatives is astounding. This map shows the protected lands in the watershed, along with a number of restoration projects. As we have noted at these meetings before, the health of the Nisqually Watershed is high, and is what enables our streams to have salmon populations.
A few other details about the watershed that were important to consider was the amount of forestland present. According to Ecology, over 239,000 acres are classified as forestland, which does not include the 59,000 acres of FSC certified JBLM, and 39,900 acres of Park land. Both of these land use designations are heavily forested. Forests are important because they sequester carbon, purify air and water, provide fuel/timber and other resources to communities, and more reasons.
Additionally, over 80% of the Nisqually mainstem is protected. Portions of the Mashel and Ohop are also being protected. The restored floodplains reduce erosion, protect salmon habiat, lower stream temperatures and improve water quality.
Lastly, according to the Earth Economics report for the Nisqually Watershed, our forests and waters provide between $287 million and $4.1 billion in ecosystem services each year. Although that’s a huge range in benefits, the bottomline is that our natural resources are important for increasing the quality of life of local residents and downstream communities. Ecosystem services include timber and food, along with things like air purification, water purification, flood regulation, carbon sequestration and more.
Although the watershed is in a relatively healthy condition, there are certain challenges that had to be considered in this planning process. Today, there are around 83,000 people living in the watershed boundaries. Additionally, the city of Olympia takes most of it’s water from aquifers within the watershed. TPU provides power to 41,000 homes in Tacoma. Besides the human uses, the watershed must provide for countless plant and animal species, including several endangered species. Furthermore, around 20,000 additional people are expected to move to the watershed in the coming decades. It’s important to provide high quality water to residents, while also considering the needs of plants and animals.