Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Field Response To Intervention Mo SW-PBS SI 2008

Field Response To Intervention Presented at Mo SW-PBS SI 2008 By Field Elementary Staff

  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Field Response To Intervention Mo SW-PBS SI 2008

  1. 1. Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention
  2. 2. <ul><li>Contact Information </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Eugene Field Elementary School </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1010 Rangeline </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Columbia, MO 65201 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dr. Carol Garman, principal </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. Who are we? Our students: <ul><li>290 students Preschool-5 th grade </li></ul><ul><li>3 classes per grade level K-1 </li></ul><ul><li>2 classes per grade level with 18-25 students per class </li></ul><ul><li>86% F/R lunch </li></ul><ul><li>50% African </li></ul><ul><li>American </li></ul><ul><li>20% Hispanic </li></ul><ul><li>13% special ed </li></ul><ul><li>58% mobility </li></ul>
  4. 4. Who are we? Our staff: <ul><li>2 Administrators </li></ul><ul><li>14 General Educators </li></ul><ul><li>3 Special Educators </li></ul><ul><li>3 Specialists </li></ul><ul><li>3 Interventionists </li></ul><ul><li>1 Literacy Coach </li></ul><ul><li>1 School Part Time Psychologist </li></ul>
  5. 5. School Improvement <ul><li>Vision </li></ul><ul><li>Mission </li></ul><ul><li>Maintaining a Narrow Focus </li></ul><ul><li>Taking Small Steps </li></ul><ul><li>Taking TIME! </li></ul>
  6. 6. Continuum of Effective Behavior and Academic Supports
  7. 7. Beginning with PBS in 2003-2004 <ul><li>Commitment </li></ul><ul><li>Team Process </li></ul><ul><li>Communication </li></ul><ul><li>Defining Expectations </li></ul><ul><li>Directly Teaching Expectations </li></ul><ul><li>Frequent, Positive Performance Feedback </li></ul><ul><li>Corrective Response </li></ul><ul><li>Data-based Decision Making </li></ul>
  8. 8. Field Elementary Discipline Data 04-05 76.8% 16.8% 6.4%
  9. 9. Evolution of PBS <ul><li>Administrative Support + Teacher Leadership </li></ul><ul><li>All Grades and Groups Represented on PBS Team </li></ul><ul><li>Morning Announcements & Signage </li></ul><ul><li>Matrix Developed, Reviewed, & Publicized, Classroom Matrices Developed, Reviewed, & Posted </li></ul><ul><li>Tiger Tool Lessons written by Team, Administrative Observations & Teacher Feedback </li></ul><ul><li>Formalizing Safe Seat & Buddy Room Guidelines </li></ul><ul><li>Mannerly Moment Loops & Schoolwide Celebrations Every 6 Weeks </li></ul><ul><li>Consistency of Data Reporting & Response to Intervention Log Used </li></ul><ul><li>Data Reports Shared Monthly Focusing on “Time Out of Instruction” </li></ul>
  10. 10. We Learned That Our Students : <ul><li>Responded to a Structured Environment </li></ul><ul><li>Responded to Explicit Instruction </li></ul><ul><li>Could learn… </li></ul><ul><li>We Focused on What We Could Change at School to Better Support All Students Behaviorally and Academically </li></ul>
  11. 11. Literacy Component Added in 2005-2006 <ul><li>Collaboration between building, district and </li></ul><ul><li>community members </li></ul><ul><li>Shifting Targeted Title 1 to School-wide Title 1 </li></ul><ul><li>“ Essential Features” Included </li></ul><ul><ul><li>prioritized time for literacy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>a structured, research-based core literacy curriculum </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>a three-tiered approach to intervention </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>consistent and monitored implementation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>support for effective implementation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>support for strategic and intensive interventions as needed </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>progress monitoring to insure effectiveness of system </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>collaboration time </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. Field Elementary Literacy Data 04-05
  13. 13. 3 rd Grade Communication Arts % of proficient and above 0.0% LEP 0.0% IEP 7.4% F/R Lunch 0.0% Black 18.2% White 5.4% Total 2004-2005
  14. 14. Classroom Teacher Enrichment based on themes of core program Classroom Teacher Tier I DIBELS benchmark Classroom Teacher Reading Mastery or Soar to Success Classroom Teacher Tier II Strategic Intervention Reading specialists, Sp Ed, ELL, Sp. Lang, K-2 SRA Reading Mastery 3-5 Wilson Reading Systems Classroom Teacher Tier III Intensive Intervention Intervention Groups 45 min, 4 days week, with: (5 th day individual focus ) Core Reading 90 min, 5 days week with: Structure
  15. 15. Core Reading and Intervention Schedule <ul><li>Core </li></ul><ul><li>K 9:00-10:30 </li></ul><ul><li>1 st 9:00-10:30 </li></ul><ul><li>2 10:00-11:30 </li></ul><ul><li>3 11:00-12:30 </li></ul><ul><li>4 1:45-3:15 </li></ul><ul><li>5 1:00-2:30 </li></ul><ul><li>Intervention </li></ul><ul><li>12:25-12:55 </li></ul><ul><li>11:30-12:15 </li></ul><ul><li>9:15-10:00 </li></ul><ul><li>10:15-11:00 </li></ul><ul><li>1:00-1:45 </li></ul><ul><li>2:15-3:00 </li></ul>
  16. 16. <ul><li>Also utilize as needed: </li></ul><ul><li>Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA & DRA-2) </li></ul><ul><li>Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) </li></ul><ul><li>District Writing Assessments </li></ul>Once a month Fall, Winter & Spring Tier I Every Other Week Fall, Winter & Spring Tier II Every Other Week Fall, Winter & Spring Tier III Progress Monitoring Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) Benchmark Data Collection
  17. 19. Formalizing Problem Solving Team in 2007-2008 <ul><li>Designed procedures, processes and forms for 2 PSTs (Academic and Behavioral) </li></ul><ul><li>Strategically chose members and leaders for each team </li></ul><ul><li>Trained team members on RtI Framework </li></ul><ul><li>PST Case-managers meet 1-1 with teachers to narrow focus of concerns and develop measurable problem statement(s) and assist in collecting baseline data </li></ul>
  18. 20. Where Have We Been & Where Are We Now? <ul><li>2003-2004 We began a building-wide process to implement Positive Behavior Support. </li></ul><ul><li>2004-2005 We began the formal process for becoming a professional learning community by developing a common vision,mission, and purpose. Planning for School-wide Title I. Looked at all data and discussed plans for school improvement. </li></ul><ul><li>2005-2007 We focused on building a collaborative culture and student learning. We began implementation of a Strategiec Three Tier Model for Literacy Instruction. </li></ul><ul><li>2007-2008 We have the structure in place and now we are looking at the most effective instructional practices known to increase student achievement: PBS, Three Tier Literacy Support and PST </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The conversations are rich with data and ideas for improving student academic and social skill learning. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The PBS Team meets twice per month to continually monitor the implementation with fidelity of the Action Plan </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>All interventionists meet twice monthly with the grade level teachers to discuss best practice, observations and student progress. </li></ul></ul>
  19. 21. Positive Behavior Support Outcomes
  20. 24. PBS Data Why the drop?
  21. 25. Strategic Literacy Support Outcomes
  22. 26. Field Literacy Data
  23. 27. 3 rd Grade Communication Arts % of proficient and above 27.3% 25.0% 22.2% 15.8% 57.1% 27.0% 2006-2007 0.0% 0.0% LEP 12.5% 0.0% IEP 14.7% 7.4% F/R Lunch 12.5% 0.0% Black 30.8% 18.2% White 15.5% 5.4% Total 2005-2006 2004-2005
  24. 28. Problem Solving Team Outcomes
  25. 29. Of students evaluated for SPED how many qualified?
  26. 30. More Field Contacts <ul><li>Kim Moore, Ed.S. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Nationally Certified School Psychologist </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Beth Kline </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Literacy Coach </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul>

×