Designed and analyzed a folding electric scooter as a senior class design project. I was the primary designer for both the mechanical and electrical systems. The scooter had specific weight and power requirements that needed to be met. The scooter's manufacturability and total cost had to be in line with comparable on-the-market scooters.
10. SPRING LOADED DECK PLATE
Spring
• Spring keeps deck plate
secure while the scooter is
being carried
• Hinge is wedge shaped to
prevent deck plate from
being over rotated
16. Performance
Performance Metric Value
Stall Force
(per motor)
33 lbf
Operation Force
(per motor)
14.7 lbf
Acceleration 3.89 ft/s^2
AccelerationTime 5.65 seconds
Runtime 56.3 min
• All calculations done using a
• Scooter mass of 23 𝑙𝑏𝑚
• Rider mass of 220 𝑙𝑏𝑚
• Motor specifications were from the
manufacturer.
• Two brushless hub motors were used in the
design of the Minnow.
17. Maximum Grade
• Raz0r e-300 (on-the-market competitor)
can handle:
• Incline of 2.88 degrees
• Grade of 3.2%
• The Minnow can handle:
• Incline of 14.32 degrees
• Grade of 15.9%
𝐹 = 0
𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝜃 + 𝜇𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝜃 =
2𝐹
𝑚𝑔
18. Brake Performance
Performance Metric Value
Brake Force 325.9 lbf
BrakeTime 0.51 seconds
Brake Acceleration -43.12 ft/s^2
Braking Distance 5.61 ft
• The Minnow uses a 3.15 inch band brake
• Actuation force calculated from 60% of the
average max grip strength of a 18-29 year old.
19. Finite Element Analysis
• All parts underwent Finite Element
Analysis (FEA) in SolidWorks as they
were designed.
• Each part is designed to have a
minimum factor of safety of 3.
20. Thermal Analysis
• Motor Analysis
• Temperature increase of 0.6 °𝐹 in the motor during acceleration from zero to max speed of 22
𝑓𝑡
𝑠
• Brake Analysis
• Temperature increase of 47.5 °𝐹
• Assumes worst cases:
• No heat is transferred while braking
• Force applied instantaneously