General Election Essay

General Election Essay
Acharya 4
Shishir Acharya Government 2306–71003 Professor Sharifian 30 October 2017 Road to an Election Running for a Texas Senate is a challenging job.
At first, you must win a primary election and get nominated from a party which you are affiliated to. After that, there comes a general election where
you must fight against the other party's nominees. In this campaign, a strong financial support is required. Candidates use their half of budget to gain
voters by boosting media supports and spends other half to make voters aware about their party's motto. The amount of money varies with different
candidates. 1 "The amount a candidate spends per vote is based on three variables: how much a candidate fundraises, how much a candidate spends
...show more content...
I should create fundraising events to go door to door of different interest groups and business organization having similar political affiliation.
My political affiliation is towards Democratic party. 2 It stands for the women right to make a decision regarding her pregnancy.Abortion is a personal
decision made by a woman, her family and her doctor so there should not be any interference of a political party or government. My platform would be
legalization of abortion. 3 Interest groups that would support me in this campaign are NARAL pro–choice Texas and Planned Parenthood Texas. Both
interest groups stand for the right of women to make a decision on her pregnancy. 4 Interest groups that would oppose me are Texas right to life
committee and Republican National Coalition for life PAC. Their motto is to defend the life of innocent human being. They believe that our life is a
gift from God and he has only the power to take the life from us.
Campaign SLOGAN is very essential to reach out to the voters. It incorporates the summary of the party principle. My SLOGAN would be "Let us
bring a change together".
Everyone of us should stand together for the right of women to make her choice on abortion. There should be no any barrier to stop her in making her
personal decision.
Newspaper, official and celebrity has a high following of people, so it will be very easy for me to get my message to the voters. I will try my best to
aware people about my party goals through
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

How Important Was The Election Of 1800?
The presidential election of 1800 was between President John Adams and Vice–President Thomas Jefferson. Adams, the incumbent, was running for his
second term after beating Jefferson four years prior. The importance of this election is not that Jefferson winning, but it is Adams losing. During this
time period, democracy was not prevalent in the world as now, so the peaceful change of power was a huge step to American democracy and to
democracy around the world. James Roger Sharp argues that the election of 1800 is the most important election because of which a president was set
by President John Adams. Washington, the first president of the country ran two terms then leaving the white house deciding not to run for a third
term, which was...show more content...
Leading up to the election, tensions were high as the issues over slavery and which states would be allowed slavery in them. This issue, since America's
founding had been swept under the rug, even being excluded from the US constitution. Since countries like Great Britain, France, Canada, and other
western countries have outlawed it and new public support had against slavery put on the forefront of the American Political sphere. The Republicans
nominated former Congressman Abraham Lincoln, an anti–slavery advocate from Illinois. He ran against Northern Democrat Stephen A Douglass,
Southern Democrat John C Breckinridge, and Constitutional Union Party candidate John Bell. In a very close and divisive election, Abraham Lincoln
won with 180 electoral votes and around thirty–nine percent of the popular vote. The south viewed Lincoln and his policies as irreconcilable and South
Carolina seceded the Union. Next came other states like Mississippi, Florida then others. Robert J Cook of Louisiana State University argues in his
book, Civil War Senator, that the Election of 1860 was the most influential in our history because of the long lasting impact on our nation with
emancipation proclamation, reconstruction and effects on political

Election In 2008 Essay
As we know, 2008 is the big year for everyone in the United States. The presidential election in 2008 was the most racially diverse in U.S. history,
there were almost one–in–four votes cast by non–whites. The presidential election in 2008 bring the surprise result for all of the people in U.S. Barack
Obama became the first African–American elected president of the United States, and Joe Biden became the first Roman Catholic elected vice
president. I think the record of voter participation in 2008 U.S presidential election is the anomaly. Obama won a decisive victory over McCain, He
was winning in both the electoral college and the popular vote, with 365 electoral votes to McCain's 173; There was the largest percentage of popular
vote for the Democrat since B.Johnson in 1964. Obama's win in obtaining a major party's...show more content...
The entitled black voters increased 4.9 percentage, It rate from 60.3% in 2004 to 65.2% in 2008, almost same as the voter turnout rate of white
allowed voters many of black voter contribution in 2008 was increased by the participation of younger voters and black women. The voter rate of
qualified black female increased 5.1 percentage, there was 63.7% in 2004 increased to 68.8% in 2008. General, amid all ethnic, gender groups and
racial, black women had the highest vote in 2008 election. There were many factors encourage voters to participate and discourage them from
participating. In the textbook page 410, " participation in politics may be increasing, in particular on the Internet." People went online to get the new
and information; they post comments for others people read. It influenced the psychology of many people and made they want to participate or not
participate. Furthermore, some of the reason for the people not voting were out of town, illness or disability did not like the candidates, or not

2016 Election Essay
Major Issues in the 2016 Election During the 2016 general election, there were many issues to be discussed. Among these issues are Health Care,
Immigration, Economics, The Supreme Court Appointments, and National Security.These Issues defined who voted for the candidates and what the
other's supporters had to say about them in hateful comments to their peers and on social media. In an election filled with slander and hate these are
the real issues igniting the fire in the souls of supporters on both sides of that old red and blue line. A HUGE issue in in the 2016 election was of
course, Immigration. Catch my cheap shot? Immigration is one of the most divisive topics in American Politics. It is a topic that has further divided the
One promise she made is to establish the first ever federal government agency strictly to handle immigration. During the race she constantly
criticized Trump's immigration ideas as "Discriminatory and Counterproductive." Another Big Issue in the '16 election was the Supreme Court.
The person who won the race would get to immediately get to nominate one Justice to the seat that has been vacant since the death of Justice
Antonin Scalia in February 2016. Along with the one initial Justice, there are 3 more current Justices, Ginsburg, Kennedy, and Breyer, who are at
or over the age of 79 years old, very close to retirement age. With this said, the person elected to office in 2016 would get to nominate one Justice
for sure and very possible up to 4. Of course, the senate would have to approve the Presidential Nominee. However, the President would possibly be
able to swing the Supreme Court either more liberal or more conservative.Most likely, President Trump will pick more conservative Justices to
nominate, following along with his party's lines. Clinton, on the other hand would have selected very liberal Justices to nominate. The impact that the
future President had over the supreme court in 2016 drove a lot of Americans to vote the way they did. With a majority liberal, Hillary Clinton
appointed supreme court, they would vote to accept several highly controversial topics such as marriage equality and

Ethical Issues In Elections
People have relied on many forms of media when it comes to politics. This year's election was a step in a different direction. The path that this
election was carving was one that was beginning to be heavily traveled. It was the road that many people gained their information about the
election their reliance of social media. With the candidates of Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Party and Donald Trump for the Republican
Party, many people were uncertain who they were going to vote for as their next Commander in Chief. Some of the people who were uncertain
who would get their vote knew about the ethical problems that Hillary had and the inexperience in the realm of government for Trump. I was one
of the many people who were left uncertain about who would get my vote. I was initially going to vote for Ben Carson because I was a firm
supporter of his beliefs and he was a major figure in the medical field. Once he dropped out, I didn't know what to do. I couldn't really vote against
my party, let alone vote for a man with a poor temperament. I had to think about my decision and thought that I would have to go with the lesser of the
two evils. Other voters had opinions on issues that they cared about. One voter had concerns on how the candidates would protect Social Security
With this year's election being as big as it is already, the media somehow finds a way for themselves to turn the tables. For example, people of
special needs were up in arms when Donald Trump made fun of a reporter with a disability. Another example of the press going after Hillary is when
she was getting constant backlash about her email scandal, Benghazi incident and the fact that she was the wife of former President Bill Clinton, who
was caught having an affair with Monica

Midterm Elections
The midterm elections of 2014 brought a measly 36.3 percent of all eligible American voters to the polls. A low of this proportion has not been
exceeded since the federal election of 1942, which had a turnout rate of 33.9 percent. Since 1942, voter accessibility has improved and we no longer
find ourselves amidst World War II (NY Times). Midtermelections generally have lower turnout rates, however, 2014 is no outlier, with voter turnout
in the United States having steadily decreased over recent decades. The 2012 election only brought 53.6 percent of eligible voters to the polls. When
compared to most developed nations, this number is tremendously low (DeSilver). While voter turnout is decreasing, more and more voters are
registering as Independents....show more content...
Rarely successful in electoral victory, nonetheless, many accomplished their goals by serving as protest statements and rallying points and by
making an influence (Schneider 1200). Minor parties have majorly influenced political and social changes. Abolition, child labor laws,
prohibition, women's suffrage, direct election of senate members and the minimum wage all have their origins in third party movements (Cramm,
Ness XIX). Many of these ideas were left unconsidered or unfavored by either of the major parties and had it not been for the influence of third
parties, who is to say what our country would be today. Professor Frances Fox Piven writes "Third parties can breathe life into American politics,
stirring the political enthusiasm of groups that are ordinarily marginalized and ignored, and reinvigorating belief in democracy with bold proposals
for reforms" and "they are the agencies that bring to life the deep reciprocity and interdependence between voters and the state on which the
democratic idea rests." (as cited in Ness, XIII) This calls to mind the intended purpose of political parties in a democracy. They fill the void between
the governed individuals and the government. They empower voters, and amplify the voices of the people. That is, of course, if they are doing their
job correctly, or allowed to do

Election Problems Essay
Election Problems
Even though my experience may be limited in politics, I still understand how grave of a situation it is having everything controlled by the republicans,
because with total domination of one party the democratic system is weighed heavily to one side. Even some republicans agree that dominance over
every branch is a problem. It is false hope for the President and his colleagues to think that just because they won the election that every person who
voted for them is supporting their conservative ways and plans. This distorted image could possibly have been humbled if the electoral system was
different. In many states Bush only won by 2% but all of the electoral votes went to him, despite the fact that 50% of voters...show more content...
During the time in which the Electoral College was established the world was very different. Neither African Americans nor women could vote. The
framers of the constitution set up this system so they would always have their hand in on the election. Even those who placed the actual Electoral
College vote were not elected at the time. The framers of the constitution assumed that they, the most educated men, should choose the president.
Obviously there is a problem with that. As the times change so should the way things are done. Updating the Electoral College is a prime example.
This year Colorado tried to pass an amendment to the states constitution that would change the way the nine electoral votes in Colorado would be
distributed. The amendment presents the idea of splitting the electoral votes to correspond with the popular votes. Critics of this argue that even
though they think the Electoral College is fine, a switch such as this might upset the entire process. While the critics of this process have a point, so
do the people of Colorado. The entire point of changing the way the votes are counted is to upset the Electoral College; this is the first step in
changing the way we elect our president.
Another argument in favor of the Electoral College states that in years past certain states have changed the way the votes are counted from being
traditional to "district plans". Changing the way the votes are counted may sway the state

Candidate-Centered Election
A "Candidate–Centered" election is when candidates focus on themselves and the issues they believe are important. Candidate–Centered election
started with the legislative reforms of the 1970s. At this time members started to focus more on the constituents and less on political party. Congress
members started working more in the areas they represented. Members focused more on projects for their constituents and using more resources to
enhance the quality of life, so they could get reelected. The projects members did were pork barrel project–dams and highways. The projects were paid
with federal installations, but only the Congress member constituents enjoyed the benefits. During "Candidate–Centered" election members started
spending more in

Election In Nepal Essay
Recently, Nepal has completed two phases of local elections in six provinces covering 67 districts out of 75 districts, leaving the 8 districts in the
province 2 for the third phase. The election result has imparted important, some expected and some unexpected, lessons for Nepali politics.
First, people were eager to participate in the elections. The overall participation level reached 71 percent. It was only expected in view of the fact that
local elections were not conducted for almost two decades and local bodies were run by bureaucrats throughout that period.
Second, there was a clear disconnect between Madheshi political leaders –– now organized around the Rashtriya Janata Party–Nepal –– and Madheshi
voters. RJP leaders had...show more content...
Franklin D. Roosevelt has said, "In our personal ambitions we are individualists." It explains the growing disconnect between the RJP leaders and
Madheshi voters. The leaders have been pursuing their personal ambitions that do not reflect the desire of the voters for better schools, hospitals,
sanitation facilities and roads. So the Madheshi voters have supported those political parties that could deliver what they want.
Indeed, identity politics has relevance for the oppressed people. As the Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy suggests, also "has troubling
implications for models of the self, political inclusiveness, and our possibilities for solidarity and resistance" It appears that it has dawned on the
Nepali voters before on the Nepali leaders that the politics of identity is not good for the country. It is reflected in the local election result.
The CPN (UML), a broad–based party, has secured the most impressive result in the election. The result surprised the RJP leaders who had gone out
of the way to call the UML leader KP Oli insane and dubbed the party as anti–Madhesh. According to some assessments, the UML is likely to repeat its
impressive performance in the remaining 8 Terai districts, the heartland of Madheshi uprising since 2006, when the vote will be held in on 18

Election Campaign Essay
Kc 2
Sabina K C Professor Sharifian GOVT 2306 October 26, 2017
Election Campaign Any candidate will need a strong financial support to run for office in Texas. Sometimes, candidate may not win the election even
after spending a lot. That means election victory does not only depend on spending, it depends on right party selection and popularity or recognition. In
2016 general elections for Texas Senate, "Juan "Chuy" Hinojosa got elected with 131,973 votes spending $435,471.91 total i.e. $3.30 per vote,
whereas, Brandon Creighton got elected with 239,640 votes spending $93,194.21 total i.e. $0.39 per vote" (The Texas Tribune). According to me, a
candidate must have investment of minimum $500,000 to run for office.
As per the Texas Democratic...show more content...
Thus, I think this interest group matches my views and can support my campaign. The NAACP is an interest group that maintains equality among
the citizens based on different sectors. It opposes racial discrimination and makes people aware about their rights and helps them to achieve them.
My ideas match with the goals that NAACP carries. Thus, this could be one of the group that can support my campaign. Talking about the interest
groups that seem to oppose my campaign, Texas Conservative Coalition (TCC) would be one of them. It holds traditional values about change and
supports conservative vision for its respective government. For me, change is equal to development. So, this group is totally against my perception
and is likely to oppose my campaign. While I was going through the description provided by Texas Christian Coalition, I found out that they wholly
support Christians in Texas. They work to preserve their legal rights, their traditional values and to support them in any legal issues. But it also shows
that they are biased regarding their religion and would not support any other religion. Whereas, my campaign would work for all the races, religion and
ethnic group without looking at their religious background. These are the reasons why this interest group would not support my campaign.
The slogan I would like to use is, "Education and Equality for Evolution". The platform I choose mainly focuses on

Incumbents In Congressional Elections Essay
Assess the extent to which incumbents have an adage over challengers in congressional elections. (25marks)
Congressional elections occur every two years and it is when members if the House of Representatives and Senate are elected. An incumbent is when a
congressman is up for re–election but is currently still holding office. We have long known that US incumbents enjoy profound electoral advantages in
congressional elections. However contrary to speculation some evidence shows that they are on an equal playing field with contesters who are not
incumbents.
One of the advantages that incumbents enjoy in congressional elections is due to "Pork barrel politics" this term is used when congressmen and
senators focus government funds into their home...show more content...
For example in Chicago's fourth district where a grassy strip of land is stuck between two expressways which connect the top and bottom halves
of a district is designed to keep a Hispanic in Congress. This congressional line protects Chicago's Hispanic representation in Congress but it also
ensures a safe Democrat seat for Democrat representative Luis Vicente Gutierrez who has now served since 1993. In 2014 this form of
gerrymandering known as "Packing" was so widespread that it was thought just 51 of 435 House Representatives seats were actually competitive.
Incumbency rates are over 80 % in the senate and over 90% in the House on average. However these figures dropped to 67% in 2010 but this is still
considerably high showing incumbents do have an

Essay On The Election
A TIME Magazine article from October of the election year highlighted the main issues and how the candidates were proposing to remedy them. It
was these issues, overcrowded schools, bad highways, "restive" minorities, rising welfare costs, and rising taxes, increased crime, drought, smog, and
race riots, that formed the platform for both candidates. (TIME) As the incumbent, Brown was in the hot seat for these issues and was being blamed.
As Reagan was a political newbie with no advertising experience, his team hired the McCann–Erickson firm. McCann–Erickson framed Reagan's
platform as "common sense answers to California's problems." (MCKENNA 33).
Of the issues that were of most concern, money issues drew the most ire among the people. As...show more content...
On the issue race relations, Reagan was against discrimination but was predicted to benefit from "white black lash votes" more than Brown. Brown
was indecisive on issues concerning race, such as open–housing. He began to work on the issue but backed away and later suggested the issue be
banned from discussion in the campaign. The Los Angeles Watts race riots in 1965 led to a call for "law and order." (MCKENNA 5) The week
–long
riots occurred in August of 1965 and led to the deaths of thirty–four people. What began with an arrest quickly turned into a race war when African
Americans began to vent their frustration over the poor conditions of the Watts district. A number of African Americans began attacking whites and
white–owned businesses, enacting a million dollars worth of damage. Governor Brown was vacationing out of the country at the time but returned
home. His perception and remarks on the riots quickly aligned him with the rioters in the public's eyes (MCKENNA 18). His comments seemed to
justify the actions of the rioters and people "forgot his commitment to law and order." (MCKENNA 18). The student demonstrations at the USC
Berkeley campus in 1966 became a central focus of the Reagan campaign. The demonstrations sparked student radicalism as a campaign issue. Matthew
Dallek in The Right Moment, contends that Berkeley and Watts provided

General Election Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from I Don'T Want To Write My Paper

More from I Don'T Want To Write My Paper (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

General Election Essay