IAC Presentation

1. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
UNIVERSITY OF WAH
1

2. 2
4th Meeting of
Industrial Advisory Committee
(IAC)
Department of Electrical Engineering
Wah Engineering College
University of Wah

3. 3

4. 4
Industrial Advisory Committee (IAC) Meeting
Agenda items
1. Confirmation of Minutes of 3rd Industrial Advisory Committee Meeting
2. EHS Policy
3. 1st Meeting of UW Linkages
4. Re-opening of University for the conduct of Labs
5. Research Proposals submitted by Faculty of EE
6. Research Proposals Evaluated by Faculty of EE
7. Nomination of Chairperson-EE as Member Technical Committee
under NSC-Auto AT PSQCA

5. 5
CQI Policy

6. Revised CQI Policy
○ During the PEC visit of EE Department, the PEC visitation team
did not raised any objection on the previous CQI policy.
○ However, as the CQI policy is same for all department, therefore
it is revised based on the observation raised by PEC visitation
team in other departments.
○ The revised CQI policy is approved from BOS, BOF and
Academic Council.
6

7. 7
OBE
Implementation
Model

8. Missing Cycles/Information in OBE
Assessments
 CLO Assessment
○ CQI process for CLO attainment at student level is missing
 PLO Assessment
○ CQI process for PLO attainment at individual level (based on
cumulative score) is missing
○ CQI process for PLO attainment at Program level (direct assessment)
is missing
 PEOs Assessment
○ Detail of bodies and their jobs in each phase is not clear
8

9. 9

10. 10
Assessment Method for CLOs
Assessment
Type
Items
Assessed
Assessment Tool KPI Assessed by
When
assessed
Direct CLOs
 Quizzes
 Assignments
 Lab reports
 Semester
projects /
Complex
Engineering
Problem
 Open Ended
Labs
 Design Project
 Mid Sem Exams
 End Sem Exams
Students
achieving
CLOs in course
≥ 40% at
individual level
Number of
students
achieving
CLOs in course
≥ 40%* at
class/cohort
level
Course & Lab
Instructor
Each semester
*As per PEC Accreditation manual 2019, the KPI for CLO attainment at cohort level
would be ≥ 50% for intake of Fall 2020 and onwards

11. Student wise
Semester Result of
each CLO
Review by DCQIC
KPI
Achieved
by the
Student?
( 40%)
No revision
Required
Is the
grade
achieved
C?
Entire course be revised in
the forthcoming summer or
in regular semester
Revise through additional
ungraded* assessments**
given in the following
semester
 After revision through additional ungraded assessments, results be edited in the OBE result sheet
for that particular student
*Ungraded = The score of such assessments would not be credited towards GPA/CGPA
**Assessments = assignments, quizzes, CEP, Project, and/or any other suggested
by DCQIC/Department
Yes
No
CQI process for CLO attainment at Individual level
I-grade be assigned
in respective course
No
Information saved in
Departmental Database
Yes
Assessed by
DCQIC
Assessed by
DCQIC
11
Students having D or F grade are
already required to revise the
course for degree completion
Check for the students having D
or F grade in a course
Student will be given additional
ungraded assessments to revise
his/her CLO score
I-grade would force student to
submit ungraded assessments
within due date
CQI Process for
CLO attainment at
Individual student
level (New)

12. 12
Revision of CLO’s
approved by DCQIC
Revision of CLO’s in
the light of corrective
actions by concerned
teacher
Possible
Corrective Actions
Recommended by
DCQIC
Analysis by
DCQIC
Student feedback
about
course
*CLO Assessment
Results
KPI Achieved?
(>=40%)
Criterion Source:
SAR
CLO Retained
Departmental
Database of
CLOs Assesment
Course Analysis
Report
Possible Corrective actions (CQI)
è Additional ungraded Assignments will be
given
è Change CLO/Learning levels
è Counseling
* CLO Revision will be carried out in case respective PLO is not achieved.
Yes
No
CQI Process for
CLO attainment at
Class/Cohort level
(old)
No detail of responsible bodies
for the data collection
Only justified for the cases when
there is no CQI process for CLO
at individual level
“Criterion Source: SAR” should
be removed
The possible corrective actions
include more than just revision of
CLO
There is no provision of
review and approval from
BOS

13. Course Analysis
Report
(From Faculty)
CQI process for CLO attainment at course/cohort level
Student feedback
about course
(IT Department,
WEC)
CLO Assessment at
course/cohort level
KPI Achieved?
( 40%*)
No action
required
Analysis by
DCQIC
Possible Corrective
Actions by DCQIC
Implementation by
Department
Information saved in
Departmental
Database
Possible Corrective actions (CQI)
 Review of CLO statement
 Review of Leaning levels of CLO(s)
 Counseling of teachers
 Counseling of students
 Any other
Yes
No
Is review by
Departmental
BOS required?
Review and Approval
by Departmental BOS
No
Yes
* KPI for CLO attainment at course/cohort level would be 50% for intake of Fall 2020
and onwards, as per the PEC Accreditation Manual 2019
Assessed by
DCQIC
Assessed by
DCQIC and
Department
13
Detail of responsible bodies for
the data collection included
A separate CQI process for CLO
attainment at course/cohort level
“Criterion Source: SAR” has been
removed
KPI would be updated for intake
of Fall 2020 and onwards as per
the PEC Accreditation Manual
2019
The possible corrective actions
include more than just revision of
CLO
There is a provision in the CQI
process for the review and
approval of BOS
Updated
CQI Process for
CLO attainment at
Class/Cohort level

14. 14

15. Assessment Mechanism of PLOs
 Direct Assessment Method
 Indirect Assessment Method
15
PLO
Assessment
Method
PLO Attainment
Level
Assessment
Tool
KPI Assessed By Frequency
Direct
Individual PLO in Courses Score ≥ 40%*
Course / Lab
Instructor
Every Semester
Course/Cohort Level
PLO attainment
through Course
% number of
students attaining
PLO in a course ≥
40%*
Course / Lab
Instructor, DCQIC
Every Semester
Individual
Cumulative Score
PLO attainment
through Courses
Cumulative Avg.
Score ≥ 40%*
DCQIC
Every Semester (4th
semester onwards)
Program Level
PLO attainment
through courses
% number of
students attaining
PLO ≥ 50%
DCQIC Every Semester
Indirect Program Level
Internship Feedback
Cumulative Avg ≥
40%*
DCQIC
After completion of
Internship
Graduating Batch
Survey
Cumulative Avg ≥
40%*
DCQIC
At time of
graduation
* KPI for PLO attainment would be ≥ 50% for intake of Fall 2020 and onwards, as per the PEC Accreditation
Manual 2019

16. Semester results
(Cumulative PLO Score
after 4th
semester
onwards)
Review by DCQIC
KPI
Achieved?
( 40%) *
No revisions required
Additional Ungraded**
Assessments*** based
revision be carried out in the
relevant courses
Are there any
courses in which
the grade of
student < C?
Revision of one or
more such courses be
suggested
Yes
The result of the latest
semester be withheld
Yes
 After revision through additional assessments, results be edited in the OBE result sheet for that particular
student
* KPI for PLO attainment would be 50% for intake of Fall 2020 and onwards, as per the PEC Accreditation
Manual 2019
**Ungraded = The score of such assessments would not be credited towards GPA/CGPA
***Assessments = assignments, quizzes, CEP, Project, and/or any other
CQI Process for PLO Attainment at Individual Level
Information saved in
Departmental Database
No
Revision
completed? (Max
duration of 14
weeks)
No
No
Yes
Assessed by
DCQIC
Assessed by
DCQIC
Assessed by
DCQIC/
Department
16
4th semester onwards, cumulative
score will be analyzed every
semester
KPI would be updated for intake
of Fall 2020 and onwards as per
the PEC Accreditation Manual
2019
Check for the students having D
or F grade in a course
Students having D or F grade are
already required to revise the
course for degree completion
Students will be given additional
ungraded assessments to revise
their PLO(s)
“Result withheld” would force
student to submit ungraded
assessments within due date
CQI Process for PLO
attainment at Individual
student level (New)

17. 17
Implemention by
Department
Review by BOS
Possible
Corrective Actions
Review by
DCQIC
PLOs Assessment
Results
(Direct)
By faculty members
Analysis & Summary
of Received Data
from faculty Member
by DCQIC for PLOs
Attainment
(Direct)
KPI Achieved?
(>=40%)
Criterion Source:
SAR
Documentation
Possible Corrective Actions (CQI)
 Review at Curriculum Level
 Review of Mapping of PLO to CLO
 Review of Assessment Methods
Departmental
Database of PLOs
Assessment
(Direct)
Yes
No
CQI Process for
PLOs attainment at
Class/cohort level
(Old CQI cycle)
Input from Departmental
Database is not required for the
PLO assessment at
course/cohort level
“Criterion Source: SAR” should
be removed
There should
be provision
in the CQI
process for
the review
and approval
of BOF and
AC

18. CQI Process for PLOs attainment at course/cohort level
Assessment (Direct)
By faculty members
Analysis and Summary of
Received data from Faculty
Member by DCQIC
KPI
Achieved?
( 40%) *
Documentation
Corrective actions
suggested by the DCQIC
Review and Approval by
Departmental BOS
Is review
by BOF
required?
Review and Approval by
BOF
Review and Approval by AC
Implementation by
Department
No
No Is review
by AC
required?
Yes
Yes
Corrective Actions
 Review at Curriculum Level
 Review of Mapping of PLO to CLO
 Review of Assessment methods
 Any other
* KPI for PLO attainment would be 50% for intake of Fall 2020 and onwards, as per
the PEC Accreditation Manual 2019
Yes
No
Information saved in
Departmental
Database
Assessed by
DCQIC
Assessed by
DCQIC/
Department
Assessed by
DCQIC/
Department
18
No Input from Departmental Database
to the PLO assessment at
course/cohort level
“Criterion Source: SAR” has been
removed
KPI has been modified for intake of Fall
2020 and onwards as per the PEC
Accreditation Manual 2019
There is a provision in the CQI process
for the review and approval of BOF and
AC
Updated
CQI Process for
PLOs attainment at
Class/Cohort level

19. 19
CQI Process for PLO Attainment at Program Level
(Direct Assessment)
PLO Scores from different
courses
Review by DCIQC
KPI
Achieved?
( 50%)
No action required
Corrective actions
suggested by the DCQIC
Review and Approval by
Departmental BOS
Is review
by BOF
required?
Review and Approval by
BOF
Review and Approval by AC
Implementation by
Department
No
No Is review
by AC
required?
Yes
Yes
Corrective Actions
 Review at Curriculum Level
 Review of Mapping of PLO to CLO
 Review of Assessment methods
 Any other
Yes
No
Information saved in
Departmental
Database
Assessed by
DCQIC
Assessed by
DCQIC/
Department
Assessed by
DCQIC/
Department
Updated
CQI Process for
PLOs attainment at
Program level

20. 20
Implementation by
Department
Review by BOS
Possible
Corrective Actions
Review by
DCQIC
Internship
Feedback
PLOs Assessment
(Indirect)
è Graduating Student
Survey
è Internship Feedback
Form
Analysis & Summary
of Received Data for
PLOs Attainment
(Indirect)
KPI Achieved?
(>=40%)
Criterion Source:
SAR
Documentation
Possible Corrective Action (CQI)
 Review at Curriculum Level
 Review of Mapping of PLO to CLO
 Review of Assessment Methods
Departmental
Database of PLOs
Assessment
(Indirect)
Graduating Student
Survey
Yes
No
CQI Process for
PLOs attainment at
Program level
(Indirect)
(Old CQI cycle)
No detail of responsible bodies
for the data collection
No Input from Departmental
Database to the PLO assessment
at program level (indirect) is
required
“Criterion Source: SAR” should
be removed
There should
be provision
in the CQI
process for
the review
and approval
of BOF and
AC

21. CQI Process for PLOs Attainment at Program Level (Indirectly Assessed)
Analysis & Summary of
Received Data from
Respective Bodies
KPI
Achieved?
( 40%) *
Documentation
Corrective actions
suggested by the DCQIC
Review and Approval by
Departmental BOS
Is review
by BOF
required?
Review and Approval by
BOF
Review and Approval by AC
Implementation by
Department
No
No
Is review
by AC
required?
Yes
Yes
Corrective Actions
 Review at Curriculum Level
 Review of Mapping of PLO to CLO
 Review of Assessment methods
 Any other
* KPI for PLO attainment would be 50% for intake of Fall 2020 and onwards, as per
the PEC Accreditation Manual 2019
Yes
No
Information saved in
Departmental
Database
Graduating Student Survey
(From IT Department)
Internship Feedback
(From Bureau of Internships
and Alumni Association)
Assessed by
DCQIC/
Department
Assessed by
DCQIC/
Department
Assessed by
DCQIC
21
Detail of responsible bodies for the
data collection included
No Input from Departmental Database
to the PLO assessment at program
level (indirect)
“Criterion Source: SAR” has been
removed
KPI would be modified for intake of Fall
2020 and onwards as per the PEC
Accreditation Manual 2019
There is a provision in the CQI process
for the review and approval of BOF and
AC
Updated CQI Process
for PLOs attainment at
Program level (Indirect)
CQI cycle)

22. 22

23. 23
Analysis of data by
Departmental
Continuous Quality
Improvement
Committee (DCQIC)
For PEOs
Attainment
Alumni
Feedback
Employer
Feedback
Other Sources
(If any)
Is the Feedback
consistent with the PEOs?
KPI Achieved?
Revision of PEOs by DCQI Committee
Review by Board of Studies (If any)
Review by Board of Faculty (If any)
Review by Academic Council (If any)
PEO Updated and implemented for next intake
Departmental Data base for PEOs Assesment
Same PEOs are
retained for new
intake
Yes
No
CQI Process for
PEOs attainment
(Old CQI cycle)
No detail of responsible bodies
for the data collection
There could be more actions
suggested by DCQIC rather than
just updating PEOs
Each type of revision has to go till
AC for its review and appoval

24. CQI Process for PEOs Attainment
Alumni Feedback
(From Bureau of
Internships and Alumni
Association)
Employer Feedback
(From Bureau of
Internships and Alumni
Association)
Other Sources
(If any)
Analysis of data by
DCQIC
Is the
Feedback consistent
with the PEOs?
KPI Achieved?
Actions suggested by DCQIC
Review and Approval by
Departmental BOS
Review and Approval by BOF
Review and Approval by AC
Is review by BOF
required?
Is review by AC
required?
Implementation of
suggested actions
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Information saved in
Departmental
Database
Suggested Actions:
 Revision of PEOs
 Revision of KPIs of PEOs
 Review at Curriculum Level
 Review of Mapping of PLO to CLO
 Review of Assessment methods
 Any other
Documentation
Assessed by
DCQIC
Assessed by
DCQIC/
Department
Assessed by
DCQIC/
Department
24
Detail of responsible bodies for the
data collection has been included
List of actions suggested by
DCQIC has been included
Provision of review and approval of
BOF and AC has been improved
CQI Process for
PEOs attainment
(Updated CQI cycle)

25. Online Education Policy
25
Salient Points
• Both Mid and End Semester Exam have been merged and there will be
only one viva voce examination. Quizzes/Assignments will be graded.
• Practical courses will be graded on the basis of assignments/reports
submitted by the students and viva of that particular course.
• Different approach for Students taking and not taking On-line Classes
POLICY

26. PEC’s OBE Manual 2019
26
Salient Points
• PEC released the third version of Accreditation manual in the
end 2019
• The minimum threshold value (i.e. KPI) should not be less
than 50% even to begin with
• Detailed description of 9 criteria's were provided to prepare
Self-Assessment report (SAR) for Accreditation of Batches
• Electrical Engineering department is preparing SAR for
accreditation of Batches 2017-19 based on PEC Accreditation
manual 2019 and will submit it by the end of October 2020.
Manual

27. Sr. Titles Supervisors
1
Hybrid Energy System for Home appliances using Solar Power
and Grid
Mr. Ijaz Husnain
2 Window Cleaning Quad-Copter using brushless DC Motors Dr. Haris Masood
3
Automatic Fault Detection and Location of Transmission Lines
using IOT
Dr. Sohaira Ahmad
4 Vehicle Over Speed Detection System Prof. Javed Mirza
5
Implementation of Intelligent Control of Room Loads using
Voice Commands
Mr. Kashif Iqbal
6
Design and Development of Control System for Monitoring of
Water Quality
Ms. Anas Ibrar
7
Shape Based Object Classification and Sorting using DC servo
Motors
Mr. Tehseen Hussain
8 Implementation of Intelligent Street Lightining System Ms. Ayla Safdar
9
Development of programmed Anti-personnel Mine for Mine
Dispensing System (MDS)
Mr. Salman Ahmad &
Mr. Kashif Iqbal
10
Irrigation System using Smart Water Distribution and Theft
Detection
Dr. Amad Zafar
Final Year Design Projects (Year 2019)
27
FYP Rubrics and Assessment forms

28. Sr. Titles
1
Power Factor improvement of industrial setup using power electronics
control
2
Conversation of conventional air conditioner into inverter air
conditioner
3
Real time solar generation and electric consumption logger of 85 kW
grid tied solar system with display
4 Design and prototype of micro grid with smart energy management
5 IoT based power distribution transformer protection system
6
Powered wheelchair control through electromyogram (EMG) using DC
servo motors
7
Monitoring and controlling of a 3-phase single bus bar system using
PLC and HMI
Final Year Design Projects Proposals (Year 2020)
28

29.  Aims
• Bridging the gap between academia and
industry
• Joint supervision of projects
• Industrial exposure to students
• Involvement of industrial experts in education
system
 Industries are invited to share their technical and
engineering problems for R&D activity.
Industrial Projects
29

30. Sr. Projects Detail
Collaboration
with /
Sponsored By
Project
Cost (M)
Duration
Faculty member
involved
Status
1
Grid Tied Solar System Installation
(255KWp in total)
Wah Nobel
Energy Ltd,
NANX Engineering
(Pvt) Ltd,
Nizam Solar, POFs
24.5
Feb 2017-
Feb 2019
Prof. Dr. Aamir Hanif
and Mr. Ashar Wahid
Completed
2 Establishment of UW Radio Station. ISPR & POFs 3.4
Jan 2017-
July 2018
Prof. Dr. Aamir Hanif,
Mr. Ashar Wahid
and Mr. Farhaj Khan
Completed
3
Upgradation of main electric supply
system using Underground electric
Cable network
POFs 5.5
Feb 2016-
July 2016
Prof. Dr. Aamir Hanif
and Mr. Ashar Wahid
Completed
4
Shifting of conventional UW
lightening system into LEDs based
lightening system
UW 0.2 -
Prof. Dr. Aamir Hanif
and Mr. Ashar Wahid
Completed
5
Design and Development of anti-
personal mines for mines dispensing
system
POFs
Funding yet
to be
assigned by
POF and UW
2018-2019
Mr. Salman Ahmad
and Mr. Kashif Iqbal
In
Progress
6 85kW Grid Tied Solar System of WEC
NANX Engineering
(Pvt) Ltd
7.99
Dec 2019-
Mar 2020
Prof. Dr. Aamir Hanif,
Mr. Ashar Wahid
Completed
Industrial Projects

31. Alumni & Employer Surveys
• Alumni Survey Form
• Alumni Survey Results (2011-2012)
• Employer Survey Form
• Employer Survey Results (2011-2012)
PEOs Assessment Tools

32. PEC Reaccreditation decision-Level II
and Compliance Report
Decision letter for the program of B.Sc. Electrical Engineering
Compliance Report / Rejoinder

33.  Identification of industrial problems
 Selection of FYP/research projects
 Research potential
 Joint Supervision
 Roadmap
Input required from IAC
33

34.  Students are encouraged to experience an internship
program of 6 to 8 weeks normally after third year i.e.
6th Semester.
 The Bureau of Internship and Alumni Association
makes an all out effort to arrange internship for all
students.
 The major objective of internship program is to give
exposure and practical hands-on experience to the
students.
Internships
34

35. List of Factories/Organization
where internship is conducted
No. of Students of
6th
Semester
POFs 33
NESCOM 4
HMC 6
Kohinoor 1
Internships
Year 2019
35
No of Students (6th Semester.): 44, Total Internships: 44

36. List of Factories/Organization
where internship is conducted
No. of Students of
6th Semester
Askari Cement Wahcantt 1
AWC, Hasanabdal 1
Bestway Cement Ltd Hattar 1
Cosmos Science Corporation, Lahore 2
Ghazi Barotha Power Plant 1
IOI Soda Ash Business, Khewra 1
PAC Kamra 1
Pakistan Oil Field, Attock 1
Pakistan Tobacco Company, Noshehra 1
PECO Islamabad 1
POF Wahcantt 7
PTC Akora Khattak Nowshera 2
Shama Ghee Mills Nowshera 2
Sukkur Thermal Power Plant, sukkur 1
Thermal Power Plant, Muzaffar Garh 1
Warsak Dam Peshawar 1
Internships
Year 2020 (COVID-19 Period)
36
No of Students (6th Semester): 69 Total Internships: 25

37. Industrial Visits
• Fall 2020
• Spring 2020
• Fall 2019
• Spring 2019
37

38.  Supervised internship opportunities
 Identify and recommend industries for internships
 Feedbacks
 Suggestions and Recommendations for effective
internship mechanism
Input required from IAC
38

39. Thank You
39