The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (III)

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (III)
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –26th
October 2020
Abstract
Paper Objective
The Moon Motion Trajectory 4th
Rule
The Moon Original Motion Angle =0.985 degrees
Paper hypothesis
- The moon uses Pythagoras rule to define its next point in motion.. this rule the
moon uses while the moon moves through its perigee radius (0.363 mkm).
- Means, this rule shows the 1st
motion step in the moon motion because it shows
the moon motion description on the perigee radius
- The next step should be to define the motion angle…
- The moon motion angle 13.18 degrees should be classified into 0.985 degrees
and 12.195 degrees
References
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (II)
https://www.academia.edu/s/b8c90a5c5a
or
https://www.academia.edu/44368860/The_Moon_Motion_Trajectory_Analysis_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-motion-trajectory-analysis-ii

I do this research
2nd
2
1- How does the moon define its next motion point?
Please Note
This triangle is NOT correct practically, for example the distance BC = 15000 km and
NOT 86000 km, based on that the point (C) must be found very far for its position in
the triangle, but still the distance EC = 373000 km = the total solar eclipse radius
i.e.
The triangle is so useful to define the distances and how there are created by it's NOT
a practical triangle to use it based on pure geometrical rules …
So please take care in its using
What we want to do here?
We will use this triangle same concept …. Where
- The data tells us that, the moon 4 basic radiuses are defined based on
Pythagoras right triangle rule, based on each other, if one dimension =86000
km,
- As this example, (0.363 mkm perigee radius)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (0.373 mkm
the total solar eclipse radius)2
.
- Similar to that the moon 4 basic motion points are defines (Perigee radius –
total solar eclipse radius – the moon orbital distance – apogee radius)
- i.e., the motion points are defined based on Pythagoras rule,
- So, in this time we will test if Pythagoras rule can be used as a general rule for
all moon motion points, i.e. if the moon uses Pythagoras rule to move from
point to another … let's try this idea in following

I do this research
2nd
3
Can The Moon Daily Motion Depends On Pythagoras Rule?
A
B C
In this right triangle, the blue ball refers to the moon, where
AB = 43000 km the distance from perigee to apogee
AC = 88000 km the distance moved by the moon per a solar day
BC = 76700 km (this distance is accounted based on Pythagoras rule)
Based on these dimensions the angle will be as following
Angle C = 29.25 degrees
Angle A = 60.75 degrees
What does this triangle tell us?
- The Moon Motion Distance Per A Solar Day =88000 Km But The Actual
Horizontal Displacement = 76700 Km
- Can that be real?
- During 29.53 days, this displacement 76700 km will pass a total distance =
2.26 million km
- 2.26 million km = the moon orbital circumference at a radius =360400 km
(very near to Perigee radius 363000 km – error 0.8%)
- The triangle tells that, if the moon makes its displacement through its orbital
circumference around Earth, on perigee radius only, the moon motion uses
Pythagoras rule to define the next point of its motion.
- i.e. the Pythagoras rule using is one method of the moon motion methods,
because the moon doesn't move all the time at perigee radius only, but the
moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its next point of motion on perigee
radius as a basic step of its motion…. means … this step is the 1st
step in the
moon motion and after the moon defines its nest point on the horizontal line by
Pythagoras rule, the moon will define its motion angle.
- So the distance is defined by Pythagoras rule…
- Now let's to see how to deal with the moon motion angle

I do this research
2nd
4
Is there an angle between the moon motion distance and its actual displacement?
- The previous analysis tells that, the moon daily motion distance 88000 km
performs a displacement = 76700 km on the horizontal level
- That means, there's some angle between the moon daily motion and its actual
displacement… and in the previous triangle (C Angle =29.2 Degrees)
- But the moon doesn't move on the perigee radius always but the moon motion
has 4 basic points (perigee – total solar eclipse – orbital distance – apogee )
- The moon daily motion displacement = 88000 km is permanent daily value
without change, so what will change is the angle… , means, we will use this
same triangle, and will change its dimension (43000 km) into (3) different
values to produce the same hypotenuse (88000 km) but with different values of
the last dimension…
How?
- If the real displacement per solar day is 76700 km (more accurate 77200 km),
this displacement will complete the moon orbital circumference (at perigee
radius r= 0.363 mkm) in 29.53 days
- We will use this same result …So
- If the real displacement per solar day is (80400 km), this displacement will
complete the moon orbital circumference (at total solar eclipse r=0.378 mkm)
during 29.53 days
complete the moon orbital circumference (at its orbital distance r=0.384 mkm)
during 29.53 days
complete the moon orbital circumference (at apogee radius r=0.406 mkm)
during 29.53 days
The values in red color will be used in the triangle in place of (76700 km) to define
the change in the their dimension (43000 km) and its angle (29.2 degrees)
The changes will be as following:
- With (76700 km), the dimension will be 43000 km and its angle be 29.25 deg
- With (88000 km), the triangle will be destroyed and the angle will be Zero
- Now we have 4 angles (29.25 deg – 23.8 deg – 21.6 deg – Zero) can one
function contains all these angles? Let's try to answer in following…

I do this research
2nd
5
A Basic Equation
(9.2 / 3.8) = (3.8/1.6)
(error 1.9%)
- How to understand that?
- We will discount (20 degrees) of all four values (29.2 – 23.8- 21.6), the result
will be (9.2, 3.8, 1.6) and the values are relative to each other as shown in the
Basic Equation
But
- What about the Zero value? How 21.6 degrees or 1.6 degrees became Zero?
- The moon motion original angle =0.985 degrees and the moon angular diameter
= 0.5 degrees their total almost equal 1.5 degrees very near to the value 1.6
degrees….
How this is be useful for our analysis?
A Conclusion:
- There's an angle used by the moon motion to create a function between the
moon daily motion distance (88000km) relative to the actual displacement the
moon moves through the moon orbital circumference,
- i.e. Not all the moon motion distance (88000km) is a displacement through the
moon orbital circumference but part of it is used as a real displacement through
the orbital circumference and this part is defined by an angle used by the moon
motion
- That's why the moon uses Pythagoras rule to define its next motion point,
because the used angle is defined by Pythagoras triangle…
Shortly
- An angle is found in the moon motion to create a function between the moon
daily motion distance (88000km) and its real displacement through the moon
orbital circumference – this angle is defined by Pythagoras triangle which is
used to define the moon motion points through its orbit.

I do this research
2nd
6
The Moon Motion Angle Definition?
A (60.75)
(29.25)
B C
C angle = 29.25 degrees, please remember
- Earth during 29.53 days moves (29.53 x 0.985 degrees) = 29.2 degrees
- The moon during 29.53 days moves (29.53 x 13.18 deg.) = 29.2 deg +360 deg.
- i.e. the angle 29.2 degrees is Earth & moon motions harmony reference,
- How can these angles help us?
Equation No. 1
- 29.25 degrees /12.19 degrees = 0.416
But
- 0.526 degrees x 0.8 degrees = 0.416 degrees2
(error 1%)
Where
- 0.526 degrees = the mars motion per solar day
- 0.8 degrees = Uranus orbital inclination
And
- 12.195 degrees = 13.18 degrees – 0.985 degrees
Please remember
- The moon original motion trajectory was 0.985 degrees per solar day because
the moon was moving a motion very similar to the Earth motion, means, the
moon moves a distance 2.58 mkm with an angle =0.985 degrees on the
horizontal line – but because of the contraction effect – the moon has to move
its daily displacement (88000 km) under the Earth gravity force and the other
additional distance (88000 km) which is done under the 4 inner planets masses
total gravity force (or electric field force), these 2 additional distances motion
causes the moon motion angle to be 13.18 degrees with additional 12.195
degrees
- Equation no. (1) shows clearly that, the additional angle (12.195 degrees) is
used independently from the moon motion original angle (0.985 degrees)
- By this additional angle 12.195 deg. The Moon And Mars Motions are
interacted by a direct effect of Uranus orbital inclination (0.8 degrees)..
- That explains the strong interaction we have found between the moon and Mars
motions, where 13.18 degrees (the moon motions degrees daily) = 0.526 deg
(the Mars motion degrees daily) x 25.2 (where 25.2 deg = Mars axial tilt, and
also (1/0.526 deg) = 1.9 deg = Mars orbital inclination, it's clearly 2 motions
almost depend on each other.

I do this research
2nd
7
Why we need this explanation?
- Because the moon motion original angle (0.985 degrees) is defined clearly in
the equation and planets data…. That tells the story is a truth….
- Now we have 2 strong proves for the claim ….
o (1st
proof) is the angle 12.195 degrees which is an additional angle added
to the moon motion original angle (0.985 +12.195 = 13.18 degrees)
o (2nd
proof) is the contraction phenomenon which is found frequently in
the solar system distances (where 40% of the solar system all distances
are effected by a contraction done based on the same rate "1.0725"), in
addition to many other data suffered from this same contraction…
o Simply, the story is truth, the moon moves in a motion similar to Earth
but because of the contraction phenomenon the moon has to move its
daily displacement (88000 km and 88000km)

I do this research
2nd
8
Is Metonic Cycle produced by A Moon Vertical Motion?
Equation No. (I)
(6939.75 days /27.3 days) = (1290 degrees /5.1 degrees)
- Let's remember this figure which we have discussed in the previous paper….
- The moon moves per day 88000 km, now we imagine that the moon will use
this distance in a vertical motion from perigee (0.363 mk) to apogee (0.406 mk)
directly without any displacement
- The moon will use in this motion a distance = 86000 km, means the moon
motion daily still need to move 2 km only,
- These 2 km, the moon will use in a horizontal displacement and The Great
Arrow Shows,
- Now, the moon orbital circumference at apogee radius =2.58 mkm, and if the
moon daily displacement =2 km, that means, the moon needs 1290 days to
revolve the moon orbital circumference at apogee radius (that's why the arrow
is on the top line and not on the bottom line, because the distance 2.58 mkm is
defined as the moon orbital circumference at apogee radius. (Apogee point is
the most far point the moon can reach its radius =0.406 mkm).
- The question was, why we need this idea? The answer is, if the value 1290 days
shows a real cycle of the moon motion, that means, the moon uses this method
as one of the moon motion methods
Equation No. (I)
(6939.75 days /27.3 days) = (1290 degrees /5.1 degrees)
(6939.75 days = Metonic Cycle period, and 27.3 days = the moon orbital period)
(5.1 degrees = the moon orbital inclination)
- This equation is one of many similar we have discussed in the previous paper to
prove that, the value 1290 (days or degrees) expresses a real cycle in the moon
motion…
What do we need to do here?!
- The previous explanation tells us that, Metonic is A Vertical Motion
- It's seen clearly in the figure, explanation and equations, (1st
) because the
displacement is done on apogee radius, (2nd
) because of the moon motion
vertically and return back, (3rd
) because of the effect of 1290 degrees on the
moon orbital inclination

I do this research
2nd
9
- Simply, Metonic Cycle is a cycle done by a vertical motion, because of that the
moon move vertically and return without horizontal displacement
- I want to say, that, this motion form is found inside the moon total motion, it's
simply a part of the motion general motion,
- As we have seen in the moon motion degrees 13.18 degrees, which we consider
it as one value, but we found that it's not true, because this value of motion
degrees 13.18 degrees = 0.985 degrees +12.195 degrees,
- Similar to that, the moon motion is consisted of many other motions considered
as parts of this general motion and that's why the moon motion needs so deep
analysis to be explained
A Conclusion
- Metonic Cycle Is A Cycle Produced By A Vertical Motion
i.e.
- The moon does a vertical motion in addition to its known horizontal
motion.

I do this research
2nd
10
References
Light Motion Features Are Discovered in Planet Motion
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/light-motion-features-are-discovered-in-planet-motion
or
https://www.academia.edu/44286772/Light_Motion_Features_Are_Discovered_in_Planet_Motion
session
https://www.academia.edu/s/69edd1d0ea
Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II)
https://www.academia.edu/44334645/Can_Different_Rates_Of_Time_Be_Found_In_The_Solar_System_Motion_II_
Matter Origin and Creation
https://www.academia.edu/43214351/Matter_Origin_and_Creation
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43197587/Is_Saturn_The_Last_Planet_Created_In_The_Solar_System_II_
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (III)

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (III)

Similar to The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (III) (15)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (III)