Earth Pluto Relationship disproves the solar group current theory And proves that the solar group is one geometrical structure

1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Pluto Data shows a relationship with Earth
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
course student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 georgytawdrous@yandex.ru / mrwaheid@gmail.com
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –2nd
December 2018
Abstract
Earth Pluto Relationship disproves the solar group current theory
And proves that the solar group is one geometrical structure
1- Introduction
In this paper we discuss a discovered relationship between Earth and Pluto which
disproves simply the gravity concept and supports my claim that
- The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this
same trajectory
Or
- The solar group is on geometrical structure and each planet is a part of this
same geometrical structure …. As I have explain in my previous paper
The Solar Group Is One Geometrical Structure
In this introduction we should discuss the geometrical meaning behind some data for
example…Mars Axial tilt = 25.2 degrees…
We know that the value (25.2) is the constant in Kepler 3rd
law using solar planets
data where the distance is million km units and the periods are in days units
So …..D3
= 25.2 x P2
(kepler 3rd
law)
But ….25.2 = 8π
Why 25.2 = 8π? Where we know that π is a cyclic number… why the constant in
kepler 3rd
law = 8π ?
Also Neptune axial tilt = 28.3 degrees but (180 /2π) = 28.6 degrees where
28.6 x 0.99 = 28.3 degrees
The question simply why many values in the solar group is cyclic numbers?
In all my papers I provide one idea…
The current theory tells us each planet is separated and independent from other
planets, based on that the planet data is his own data
I try to prove that, the solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a
point ion this same trajectory which makes each planet data is suitable and
complementary to other planets data, and this the reason caused the previous data
creation.
Marx axial tilt (25.2) is the constant in kepler 3rd
law equation basically because
(25.2= 8π) which means Mars axial tilt is a cyclic number because this same value

2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
works for many planets and should be in harmony with all of them, that's why Mars
axial tilt should be a cyclic number…
Also Neptune axial tilt 28.3 degrees does a similar role because Neptune reflected the
main energy toward the inner planets… that's why this planet should have a cyclic
numbers to enable him to get harmony with many other planets
Please review
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
I want to say that,
Because the solar planets are connected together (as one trajectory of Energy) that
makes the cyclic numbers are necessary numbers to provide the harmony between
these connected planets…
Pluto Data shows a strong relationship with Earth and supports this claim strongly.
In fact the main connection between Pluto and Earth is the distance 0.406 million km
0.406 million km =
= Earth Moon distance at apogee radius (I)
= Pluto Velocity Daily (II)
= 2088 mkm x (71)2
(III)
Equations I and II are clear let's discuss the third one
Equation (III)
2088 million km = Jupiter Uranus Distance, we have discussed this distance
frequently… the light travel this distance is 6939.75 seconds but we know Metonic
Cycle =6939.75 days
If fact I claimed that the second value in light motion will be a day value in the moon
motion
This process is done by Pluto contribution but this geometrical role isn't clear yet
before me…. But in this paper I provide data proves the Earth Pluto Relationship and
in next one we should discuss how the valu4e 1 second van be 1 day…
The important value is (71)2
= 5041 but we know that Mercury needs 5040 seconds to
make his day 176 days
So Jupiter Uranus distance if contracted by lorentz length contraction effect with rate
71 (which is produced by a velocity v=0.9999c) for 2 times. Means (71)2
will
produce this same distance 0.406 million km
Now Metonic Cycle and the moon orbit are found based on this same value 0.406
mkm and I claim that Pluto contributed by his relationship with the Earth to do this
job. That means the moon orbit and Metonic Cycle are found by help of Pluto..
Any way the previous data can be explained only by my theory that the solar group is
one geometrical structure. where the value (71)2
(relativistic effect) is used frequently
in the solar group geometrical structure but seen by us as 5040 seconds.

3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
3- Earth Pluto Relationship
3-1 The orbital Period and Distance
I- Data
1- Pluto orbital period 90588 days = 8π3
x 365.25 days (Earth orbital period)
2- Pluto orbital Circumference 37000 mkm = 8π3
x 149.6 mkm Earth orbital
(distance)
3- Earth Velocity daily 2.58 mkm = Pluto Velocity Daily 0.406 mkm x 2π
II- Discussion
The data is clear enough
- Pluto Orbital Period depends on Earth orbital period
- Pluto Orbital Distance depends on Earth orbital Distance
- Earth Daily Velocity depends on Pluto Daily Velocity
3-2-Orbital inclination and axial tilt
I- Data
- 17.4 deg.(inner planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 17.2 deg. Pluto
orbital inclination
- 23.6 deg.(outer planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 23.4 deg. Earth axial
tilt
- 122.5 deg. Pluto axial tilt = 17.2 deg. Pluto orbital inclination x 7.1 (lorentz
length contraction rate for a velocity v=0.99c)
II- Discussion
I wish the data is clear before our eyes
There's a geometrical reason based on which both value of Pluto orbital inclination
and Earth axial tilt ar4e produced…. This is the only why to explain the previous data
If there's a geometrical reason effect on both planet (Pluto and Earth) that means
there's a geometrical relationship between these 23 planets which disproves the
gravity concept.
3-3 General Relationships
I- Data
- 232.7 deg. (inner planets axial tilts total) = 1461 days (earth 4 years cycle)/2π
- 232.7 deg. = 122.5 deg. Pluto axial tilt x 1.9 deg. Mars orbital inclination
- 232.7 deg.= 37000 mkm (Pluto orbital circumference) / 16 π2
- 37000mkm (Pluto orbital circumference)= 1461 days x 25.2 deg.
We should remember our rule 1 million km = 1 day = 1 degree…

4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
Important Equation
- 179.7 deg. x 7 = 1259.3 deg. but 1259 deg x 0.406 = 511.1 (solar planets axial
tilts total)
II- Discussion
I can't explain the geometrical rules which produced this data but I can confirm that
this data is produced based on a geometrical reason which proves there's a
geometrical relationship between Earth and Pluto disproving the gravity concept.
Author Other Papers
1st Degree in Physics Needs 24 Years!! (My Story)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0339
The Moon Motion Trajectory
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0313
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"(Part2)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0188
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0178
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square (Proves2)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0163
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square (Proves)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0147
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0135
Solar Planets Motions Trajectory is A Pyramid or A Cone? (Part II)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0096
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All papers
https://www.slideshare.net/search/slideshow?searchfrom=header&q=gerges+francis+papers