Earth velocity daily (2.58 mkm) = Pluto velocity daily (0.406 mkm) x 2π
The previous relationship is found based on 2 reasons –at least- which are:
1- Earth and Pluto are the 2 ends of the solar group main energy trajectory.
2- Earth and Pluto Relationship is found through the moon orbit (Earth moon orbit)
This paper tries to prove these facts.
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Motions Concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
i.e.
Planet Motion depends on Light Motion
Or
Planet is a result of light Motion
Where
Planet & light Motion Interactions depends on this concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
Which this paper tries to prove
This paper completes the discussion in the previous one
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
C2= 90000 mkmm (my claim)
90000 mkm = 86400 mkm +3413 mkm +187 mkm
We continue our discussion concerning the solar group main equation…
The Equation tells new information:
1- The Planet Motion depends on the solar group geometrical structure and not on the gravity forces.
2- Metonic and Saros Cycles both of them originated from the same source which causes their relationship and dependency
A light beam with velocity (1.16 mkm per sec), creates the solar system Gerges francis
Abstract
-There are 2 light velocities in the solar system (1.16 mkm/sec & 0.3 mkm/sec)
-Because of the high velocity motions, time & distance values are equivalent
Example No. I
Let's see how the solar system is created in following:
- Mercury is created by a period of time =50 seconds
-Light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec travels for 50 seconds a distance =58 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance (=360 mkm Mercury orbital circumference)
-360 mkm -because of high velocity motion – is used as 360 seconds
-Light beam with velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) during 360 seconds travels a distance = =108 mkm = Venus Orbital Distance
-216.4 mkm (Venus Orbital Diameter) is a distance passed by light beam its velocity 0.3 mkm/sec during a period =720 seconds
-720 seconds is used as a distance =720 mkm = Mercury Jupiter distance –
-Mercury Jupiter diameter (720 mkm x 2) needs a period = 720 seconds x 2 which needs a distance = 216.4 x 2 mkm
-(the distance 216.4 mkm x 2) is used as a time period in the following equation: 216.4x 2 x 1.16 mkm/s= 500 mkm (500 mkm is used as a time period= 500s)
-Light beam ( 0.3 mkm/sec) needs 500 s to pass Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm)
-Still the distance 720 mkm is produced by a light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) during a period = 627 seconds (Example No. I is discussed deeply in this paper)
Conclusion
(1st) There's a light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(2nd) The solar system is created depending on light motions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Theory of Matter Creation supposes that, the matter is bright fringes and the distance is dark fringes..
i.e.
The planet is bright fringes and his orbital distance is dark fringes both of them are created from the same light coherence that explains the planet diameter and his orbital distance relationship…
Please review
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
This study tries to answer the question "How does the planet move?" let's summarize the answer in following:
- The planet is created and connected with a light beam..
- So this light beam moves firstly
- Then the Planet moves following this light beam with different rate of time (the planet original motion)
- This motion (action) has a reaction (another motion) which =99% of the original one
i.e.
- The planet motion contains 3 motions together (the light beam motion- the planet original motion and the planet reacted motion which =99% of the original one) (hypothesis)
- Do these 3 motions of the solar planet interpret the planet 3 cycles (Planet rotation cycle – Planet day – Planet orbital period)?
This paper discusses this idea trying to prove it…
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part IV)Gerges francis
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods= 3 Mercury Rotation Periods?
We still discuss this question whose discussion is started in the previous paper
"Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances"
Also we try to know If the previous relationship has any effect of Mercury Data
We complete the same discussion (in previous parts of the same series
Paper hypothesis
-Planet diameter (or circumference) is created as a function in another planet diameter and velocity
The hypothesis explanation
- By this technique the produced planet diameter will be in harmony with the parent one, and accordingly, will be in harmony with all other planets diameters, circumferences and motions
- This harmony is a necessary to guarantee the planets motions general harmony..
- Planet diameter creation depending on another planet diameter and velocity, is done by A Motion Transportation Process, and by that planet diameter is created in harmony with its velocity and day period
Based on this concept we can explain the following data
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (-1.2%)
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = its circumference x 2
- This specific data is produced as results for the motion transportation process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Let's remember our main argument in this papers series "Matter Creation Principle"
I have claimed the following:
(1) Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second period only
(2) Light Motion for 1Second causes Planet to move for 1 solar day
(3) Based on Planet motion for 1 solar day – Solar Planets are created…
(4) Specifically – Pluto motion for 1 solar day is a result of light motion for 1 second period (light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec) and based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day – the planets diameters are created that's why Pluto Motion Distance Daily = 406000 km= Planets Diameters Total
But
(5) We have discovered that Earth Moon Orbit defines solar Planets diameters Where
a. Apogee Radius = Solar Planets Diameters Total
b. Perigee Radius = Outer Planets Diameters Total
c. Apogee–Perigee Distance =inner planets diameters total =Earth Circumference
(6) Based on the previous data we have concluded that (1st Conclusion) Pluto and Earth Moon together effect on Solar Planets Diameters Creation process (2nd Conclusion) light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec is sent from Pluto to Earth causes the Earth Axial Tilt (23.45degrees)
Also
(7) We have discovered that 2 Jupiter Diameters +1 Saturn Diameter = Solar Planets Diameters Total =406000 km
(8) i.e. Jupiter Diameter = 8 Planets Diameters Total
(9) These relationships are depended also on light beam velocity 1.16 mkm /sec
What we need to do in this paper?
The previous claim is a heavy one, so we need to discuss (1st) More Proves & Details (2nd) How does this machine work?
Let's start immediately…
Please Note
Paper Methodology is mentioned in "Matter Creation Principle (Part III)"
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Motions Concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
i.e.
Planet Motion depends on Light Motion
Or
Planet is a result of light Motion
Where
Planet & light Motion Interactions depends on this concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
Which this paper tries to prove
This paper completes the discussion in the previous one
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
C2= 90000 mkmm (my claim)
90000 mkm = 86400 mkm +3413 mkm +187 mkm
We continue our discussion concerning the solar group main equation…
The Equation tells new information:
1- The Planet Motion depends on the solar group geometrical structure and not on the gravity forces.
2- Metonic and Saros Cycles both of them originated from the same source which causes their relationship and dependency
A light beam with velocity (1.16 mkm per sec), creates the solar system Gerges francis
Abstract
-There are 2 light velocities in the solar system (1.16 mkm/sec & 0.3 mkm/sec)
-Because of the high velocity motions, time & distance values are equivalent
Example No. I
Let's see how the solar system is created in following:
- Mercury is created by a period of time =50 seconds
-Light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec travels for 50 seconds a distance =58 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance (=360 mkm Mercury orbital circumference)
-360 mkm -because of high velocity motion – is used as 360 seconds
-Light beam with velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) during 360 seconds travels a distance = =108 mkm = Venus Orbital Distance
-216.4 mkm (Venus Orbital Diameter) is a distance passed by light beam its velocity 0.3 mkm/sec during a period =720 seconds
-720 seconds is used as a distance =720 mkm = Mercury Jupiter distance –
-Mercury Jupiter diameter (720 mkm x 2) needs a period = 720 seconds x 2 which needs a distance = 216.4 x 2 mkm
-(the distance 216.4 mkm x 2) is used as a time period in the following equation: 216.4x 2 x 1.16 mkm/s= 500 mkm (500 mkm is used as a time period= 500s)
-Light beam ( 0.3 mkm/sec) needs 500 s to pass Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm)
-Still the distance 720 mkm is produced by a light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) during a period = 627 seconds (Example No. I is discussed deeply in this paper)
Conclusion
(1st) There's a light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(2nd) The solar system is created depending on light motions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Theory of Matter Creation supposes that, the matter is bright fringes and the distance is dark fringes..
i.e.
The planet is bright fringes and his orbital distance is dark fringes both of them are created from the same light coherence that explains the planet diameter and his orbital distance relationship…
Please review
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
This study tries to answer the question "How does the planet move?" let's summarize the answer in following:
- The planet is created and connected with a light beam..
- So this light beam moves firstly
- Then the Planet moves following this light beam with different rate of time (the planet original motion)
- This motion (action) has a reaction (another motion) which =99% of the original one
i.e.
- The planet motion contains 3 motions together (the light beam motion- the planet original motion and the planet reacted motion which =99% of the original one) (hypothesis)
- Do these 3 motions of the solar planet interpret the planet 3 cycles (Planet rotation cycle – Planet day – Planet orbital period)?
This paper discusses this idea trying to prove it…
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part IV)Gerges francis
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods= 3 Mercury Rotation Periods?
We still discuss this question whose discussion is started in the previous paper
"Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances"
Also we try to know If the previous relationship has any effect of Mercury Data
We complete the same discussion (in previous parts of the same series
Paper hypothesis
-Planet diameter (or circumference) is created as a function in another planet diameter and velocity
The hypothesis explanation
- By this technique the produced planet diameter will be in harmony with the parent one, and accordingly, will be in harmony with all other planets diameters, circumferences and motions
- This harmony is a necessary to guarantee the planets motions general harmony..
- Planet diameter creation depending on another planet diameter and velocity, is done by A Motion Transportation Process, and by that planet diameter is created in harmony with its velocity and day period
Based on this concept we can explain the following data
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (-1.2%)
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = its circumference x 2
- This specific data is produced as results for the motion transportation process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Let's remember our main argument in this papers series "Matter Creation Principle"
I have claimed the following:
(1) Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second period only
(2) Light Motion for 1Second causes Planet to move for 1 solar day
(3) Based on Planet motion for 1 solar day – Solar Planets are created…
(4) Specifically – Pluto motion for 1 solar day is a result of light motion for 1 second period (light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec) and based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day – the planets diameters are created that's why Pluto Motion Distance Daily = 406000 km= Planets Diameters Total
But
(5) We have discovered that Earth Moon Orbit defines solar Planets diameters Where
a. Apogee Radius = Solar Planets Diameters Total
b. Perigee Radius = Outer Planets Diameters Total
c. Apogee–Perigee Distance =inner planets diameters total =Earth Circumference
(6) Based on the previous data we have concluded that (1st Conclusion) Pluto and Earth Moon together effect on Solar Planets Diameters Creation process (2nd Conclusion) light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec is sent from Pluto to Earth causes the Earth Axial Tilt (23.45degrees)
Also
(7) We have discovered that 2 Jupiter Diameters +1 Saturn Diameter = Solar Planets Diameters Total =406000 km
(8) i.e. Jupiter Diameter = 8 Planets Diameters Total
(9) These relationships are depended also on light beam velocity 1.16 mkm /sec
What we need to do in this paper?
The previous claim is a heavy one, so we need to discuss (1st) More Proves & Details (2nd) How does this machine work?
Let's start immediately…
Please Note
Paper Methodology is mentioned in "Matter Creation Principle (Part III)"
Why is Saturn Velocity 9.7 km Per Second? Gerges francis
Paper Question
- Why Jupiter velocity =13.1 km per second?
- Jupiter needs by this velocity a period =10921 seconds to pass a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
- But
- 10921 km = The Earth moon circumference
- How this value can be used as 10921 seconds?
- The paper tries to discover some geometrical method to solve this question
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves)
Abstract
Time And Distance Values Can Be Equivalent In Higher Velocity
i.e.
Time & Distance Values Equivalence Is Occurred As A Relativistic Effect.
Briefly ….
When a particle moves with high velocity (near to light velocity), So this particle may suffer from the following effects:
1- Mass Increasing
2- Length Contraction
3- Time Dilation
4- Time & Distance Values Equivalence
Point No. 4 is my conclusion I have reach through The Solar Planets Data Analysis -
This paper tries to prove this fact that
(Time and Distance Values can be equivalent – In Higher Velocity)
My Research Basic Arguments (Part IV):
16th There's A Light Beam Travels With 1.16 Million Km/Sec
This paper tries to prove this fact
References
My Research Basic Arguments (Part I)
My Research Basic Arguments (Part II)
My Research Basic Arguments (Part III)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (II)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's an interaction between Earth and Jupiter Motions
The hypothesis Explanation
- What does mean "an interaction of motions"?
- I have searched for a suitable word to explain a dependency of motions data for both planets on one another - and I have choose the word "Interaction"
- Earth and Jupiter motions data depend on Each other – that means- I can write Jupiter motion detailed data by analysis Earth Motion Data –
- The paper will discuss that as deep as possible to prove this point of view
- But how does that happen?
- The "Interaction of Motions" disproves the description supposes that the solar planets are separated rigid bodies revolve around the sun, each planet creation and motion data is independent from the others. "This description is incorrect"
- The solar planets are created from one trajectory of energy (or from one light beam) which had created the planet and its orbital distance to be complementary with the other planets data to create the general harmony of motions – that means- the solar group is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of it
- "The Motions Interaction" is a method to examine the planets creation and motion data origin and to answer (how this data be created)?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)Gerges francis
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
Why Mercury Day Period = 4222.6 hours? (II)Gerges francis
-There's a light beam travels with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
-The Solar System is a puppets theater – the planets move together one unified motion as a train carriage
-The solar system unified motion depends on a period = 8 Mercury Day Periods =1407.6 solar days
-The planets unified motion main cycle (1461 days) depends on the period 1407.6 days (=8 Mercury Day Periods)
-The solar system is a machine moves to create different rates of time - so a planet cycle uses the second period to create the minute period –another cycle uses the minutes to create the hour period, and another uses the hours to create the solar day …..etc
- For example Mercury 8 days period (1407.6 solar days) is used as its rotation period (1407.6 hours) –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Light And Planet Motions Interactions (II)Gerges francis
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
We complete our discussion to answer this question
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
There's A Light Beam Travels With 1.16 mkm per sec (III)Gerges francis
More Proves For The Argument
" There's A Light Beam travels With 1.16 mkm/Sec",
1- The inner planets orbital distances can't be created if there's no light beam travels with 1.16 mkm/sec in the universe.
2- The distances between Jupiter and the inner planets can't be created if there's no light beam travels with 1.16 mkm/sec
3- Pluto can't be stayed in the solar system if there's no light beam travels with 1.16 mkm/sec
4- Shortly, the solar system without a light beam travels with 1.16 mkm/sec should be destroyed.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus Rotation Period Analysis (II) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Mercury motion is equivalent to 24 hours of the moon motion
- This rate of time (1hour =24 hours) is used in the solar system motion and because of that ( Venus & Uranus motions use this same rate
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar group is a clock, its basic task is to receive the energy of light motion for 1 second and by this energy causes a planet motion for 1 solar day – because of that the rate of time ( 1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- The question is, Why Does The Solar System Need Different Rates Of Time?
- The direct answer for this question is that (to create a configuration for the moon orbital motion during its day period)
- The moon apogee orbital circumference = 2550973 km, where the moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) be = 2598693 km
- This difference in 2 distances is found as a result of the geometrical mechanism by which the rate of time (1 h is equivalent to 24 hours) is created.
- Shortly, because of these 2 distances difference, the moon motion has to create the rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours) in comparison with Mercury motion – which causes Mercury Motion to lead the moon motion. the paper discusses this process geometrical details.
- Notice
- The rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours = 1 solar day) is a rate used in the solar system but –
- The rate of time between Mercury and the moon motions almost is (1 hour of Mercury Motion is equivalent to 2 days of the moon motion) means (1 solar day of the moon motion = a half of hour of Mercury Motion)
- This conclusion is added to the paper discussion after revision – in the paper discussion we have to discuss this rate also in addition to the basic one (1 hour =24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (III)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Planet Day Period Definition : The Period Through Which The Planet Moves A Distance = Its Circumference.
Paper Question No. (1)
Is There An Interaction Between The Earth Moon & Jupiter Motions?
- Because
- Jupiter Diameter 142984 = The Earth Moon Circumference 10921 km x 13.1
- Where
- 13.1 km /sec = Jupiter Velocity …………And
- 13.18 degrees = the Earth moon motion degrees per solar day
- Shortly
- Are these 2 values (13.1 and 13.18) created depending on each other
- Which proves an interaction between Jupiter & the Earth moon Velocities
Paper Question No. (2)
If This interaction is found, can it effect on both Planets Days Periods?
- The paper discusses these questions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)Gerges francis
This paper discusses Mercury Data to prove 3 conclusions which are:
1- The solar group is one machine, each planet is a gear in this same machine. (i.e. each solar planet depends on other solar planets in his Origin And Motion).
2- Mercury Data shows a relationship with Jupiter can't be explained by gravity concept or any current theory. (i.e. The Solar Group Current Theory Is Insufficient)
3- Special Theory of Relativity provides empirical results only and need a theoretical extension to be a complete theory. (Specifically, the theory needs to explain why the lorentz length contraction phenomenon is done and what geometrical effect it practices)
The paper also suggest the following idea
"The Time existence depends on relativistic effects"
i.e.
"Time Definition" is a process extends beyond the human daily experiences
This paper completes the previous discussion
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
Earth Motion
1- Abstract
Earth motion is one paper I have promised to write from years, just now I can do that!
Why have I promised but couldn't? ….the reason was the following…
- The moon orbital radius at total solar eclipse = 0.370 mkm, its circumference = 2.32 mkm = 58.6 x 40080 km (Earth Circumference)
- Now let's imagine:
- If the moon orbital circumference (2.32 mkm) is a great gear and the Earth circumference (40080 km) is a small gear …. Now let's these gears to rotate
- The great gear (2.32 mkm) needs to rotates (one time only), and that will causes the small gear to rotate 58.6 times, means Earth circumference will rotate around its axis 58.6 times but one rotation of Earth circumference means one solar day, so Earth will rotate (58.6 solar days).
- But ….Earth moves per solar day a distance = 2.58 million km
- 2.58 mkm x 58.6 days = 149.6 million km (Earth Orbital Distance)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
We still try to prove this same hypothesis we have suggested in the previous paper
Let's explain the proving process as simple as possible:
- I suppose there are 2 different rates of time in the solar system motion – Where (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – how to prove this hypothesis??
- We have 2 method to do that:
- (1st Method) to use Lorentz Transformation by creating Time dilation which enable different rates of time to be produced – but at first we need to prove that there are relativistic effects in the solar system and to define the high velocity motion which causes these relativistic effects – and I have proved that, there are relativistic effects in the solar system in my previous papers
- (2nd Method) to use the solar system geometrical necessities – let's explain this idea as possible in following:
o If there are 2 rates of time in the solar system as I claim, and if the solar system is one machine or one building as I suppose that means this one building has 2 rates of time
o That will necessitate to create the planets data in proportionality with both rates of time otherwise the machine can't work
o This is similar to use 2 different size gears in one machine, to do that, we have to uses some other gears their dimensions be in proportionality with BOTH gears otherwise the machine will not work…
o This is the idea I try to use, suggesting that, if there are different rates of time in the solar system, that necessities the planets data to be created in Proportionality with Both Rates of time – and because of that we can conclude there both rates of time by these planets data analysis
o This paper tries to prove that, the planets data are created by their values because (1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The moon moves with 2 different velocities – Why? ….Because
The moon is a light beam his velocity is The Light Known Velocity (0.3mkm/s)
And
The moon orbit is created of light beam also (Light Supposed Velocity 1.16 mkm/s)
The moon passing through his orbit causes light coherence, creating the matter to be created (The Moon Planet Creation)
i.e. The moon was a light beam before to enter his orbit around Earth and becomes A Planet moves by masses gravity when he enters the orbit
i.e. The Moon Moves By 2 Rates Of Time Because He Moves 2 Different Motions – Moves As A Light Beam And As A Planet.
What does prove the moon motion as a light beam?
10921 km (moon circumference) x 27.3 days (moon orbital period) = 0.3 mkm
This equation tells -If the moon rotates around his axis one rotation daily, he will pass during his orbital period a distance = light motion (0.3mkm/s) for 1 second!
10921 km (moon circumference) x 86400 seconds (solar day)= 940 mkm
This equation tells- If Earth revolves around the sun one complete revolution in 1 solar day – so the moon circumference will = its motion for 1 second
The equations geometrical mechanism is hard to be explained – but the light velocity effect is seen (And need deep discussion to discover it)
Abstract
I claim that Mars immigrated from his original Point at orbital distance =84 mkm to dwell in his point at orbital distance 227.9 mkm..
And this immigration causes the following results:
1- A disturbance for the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship (which is proven clearly from the solar planets order)
2- Pluto Immigration, because Pluto had to move to the Solar group End where he before belonged to the inner planets.
This study tries to prove these facts
Also I provide in this Study my suggested description for the solar group.
Introduction
The solar planets order tells us clearly that there's a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance… this conclusion we get easily from the following planets order:
Mercury – Venus – Earth..
The previous planets order tells us a clear rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Something was happened with Mars
After Mars this rule is reversed as we see in the following planets:
Jupiter – Saturn - Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The rule became "Planet Greater Diameter has A Shorter Orbital Distance"
(Please Note/ Uranus greater in diameter and less in Mass from Neptune that tells us the planets order depends on their diameters and NOT on their Masses)
What happened with Mars?
Mars immigration from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
Let's return Mars to his original point at orbital distance = 84 mkm
What the solar planets order will be:
Mercury – Mars - Venus – Earth..
This follows completely the rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Based on this description there are 2 planets at least immigrated from their original points:
1- Mars immigrated from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
2- Pluto who belonged before to the solar inner planets (my hypothesis) and had to move to the End of the solar group because the rule became reversed… \
This paper tries to prove these facts
To do that we have to prove the following:
1- Mars moved from his original point (Mars is exceptional Planet)
2- Pluto belonged before to the solar inner planets..
This paper contains 2 points
3- Mars Original orbital distance was 84 mkm
4- An Alternative Solar Group Description
Abstract
I claim that Mars immigrated from his original Point at orbital distance =84 mkm to dwell in his point at orbital distance 227.9 mkm..
And this immigration causes the following results:
1- A disturbance for the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship (which is proven clearly from the solar planets order)
2- Pluto Immigration, because Pluto had to move to the Solar group End where he before belonged to the inner planets.
This study tries to prove these facts
Also I provide in this Study my suggested description for the solar group.
Introduction
The solar planets order tells us clearly that there's a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance… this conclusion we get easily from the following planets order:
Mercury – Venus – Earth..
The previous planets order tells us a clear rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Something was happened with Mars
After Mars this rule is reversed as we see in the following planets:
Jupiter – Saturn - Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The rule became "Planet Greater Diameter has A Shorter Orbital Distance"
(Please Note/ Uranus greater in diameter and less in Mass from Neptune that tells us the planets order depends on their diameters and NOT on their Masses)
What happened with Mars?
Mars immigration from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
Let's return Mars to his original point at orbital distance = 84 mkm
What the solar planets order will be:
Mercury – Mars - Venus – Earth..
This follows completely the rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Based on this description there are 2 planets at least immigrated from their original points:
1- Mars immigrated from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
2- Pluto who belonged before to the solar inner planets (my hypothesis) and had to move to the End of the solar group because the rule became reversed… \
This paper tries to prove these facts
To do that we have to prove the following:
1- Mars moved from his original point (Mars is exceptional Planet)
2- Pluto belonged before to the solar inner planets..
This paper contains 2 points
3- Mars Original orbital distance was 84 mkm
4- An Alternative Solar Group Description
We still analyze Jupiter Data - the paper tries to answer the following questions:
1.Why the three inner planets distances to Jupiter = their orbital circumferences but not accurately (with error 1%)?
Specifically
a.Venus Jupiter Distance 673 mkm = Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm
b.Earth Jupiter Distance 930 mkm = Earth orbital circumference 940 mkm (In this cases Earth and Jupiter should be at 2 different sides from the sun so 778.6 mkm +149.6 mkm = 930 mkm)
c.Mercury moves during its day period (175.94 solar days) a distance = 720.7 mkm= Mercury Jupiter distance
2.Do these 3 planets define their orbital circumferences depend on their distances to Jupiter? If yes, How?
3.Can Jupiter with the inner planets (including Mars) consist one system move together as a train carriages?
Paper Conclusions
I-There's A Light Velocity =1.16 mkm/Sec
II-Jupiter effects On The Inner Planets Periods Of Time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
There are relativistic effects in the solar group (proves)Gerges francis
The Main Hypothesis
"There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group"
We can't observe the higher velocity which produces these relativistic effects but we can observe the relativistic effects which are produced by it.
As proves for the relativistic effects, I may refer to the following:
1. The Earth Moon Motion …
2. Mercury Day Period…
The previous 2 phenomena should be discussed in this paper with many other as proves for the relativistic effects are found in the solar group geometry.
This Papers provides 2 Points
1st Point : The Relativistic Effects Proves
2nd Point : The Relativistic effects Geometrical Meaning and Description.
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Moon Orbital Distance Is Proportional To Its Parent Circumference
-This hypothesis is suggested by the previous observation, which are
o Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
o Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x circumferences
o Uranus moves during its day period a distance = 2.6 x circumferences
- This observations lead us to conclude that, Planet motion may depend on its circumference or the motion distance be function of the planet circumference..
- Then, the moon orbital radiuses analysis lead us to conclude this hypothesis, this paper tries to prove it
- By the hypothesis prove, many other old claims can be supported in addition, let's write them down here:
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Day Period (Short Discussion) (Part II)Gerges francis
We complete our discussion in the previous paper let's summarize its conclusion
Previous Paper Conclusion
- Before matter creation, the universe was created of light beam its velocity=1.16 mkm/sec
- The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) is the origin source of energy from which the matter and light known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) were created
- In some interaction (or coherence) process light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) was the only input and the output were light known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) and the matters – this interaction (coherence) process is occurred above Earth Axis – that means Earth was the First Matter is created in the universe.
- Because the motions are motions of light beams (different velocities of light) so the time and distance values simply are exchangeable with each other – that's why the equal values can be used in time or distance units…
Previous Paper Question
"Why Mercury Day Period =175.94 Solar Days?"
Paper Question
If There 2 Are Electric Fields In The Solar System, Is There Any Task Done By Their Cooperation?
The Sun Rays Production Is A Task Done By The 2 Electric Fields Cooperation
- I suppose that, the sun rays energy source isn't any nuclear interactions, instead, I claim, the solar planets motions energies total is the sun rays energy source.
- The sun rays production process is a task depends on all planets motions energies, So, if there are electric fields in the solar system, they will be discovered in this process…
- The sun rays basic condition is to create another rate of time, where (1day on the sun = 1 year on the Earth), and that means, the planets motions energies total during a complete year (in earth rate of time) will be used in one day (in the sun rate of time) and that will cause a great concentration of the total energy creating the sun rays (light wave) from mechanical motions energies (mechanical waves).
- In this paper we discuss the sun rays production details, trying to discover both electric fields found in the solar system
- Please remember, in the solar system I supposed that there are 2 electric fields, one in the inner planets which is found based on electric charges, and the second field is found in the outer planets is found by light beam out of which the planets matters are created, these 2 electric fields are created from one source which is Jupiter energy because Jupiter is the source of the solar system energy.. both electric fields are similar with only one difference which is that, the outer planets electric field suffers from (time dilation) because it depends on the light beam. The time dilation makes this electric field more slow in action and be insufficient to complete the required tasks… let's start to discuss our subject and extends our discussion about these 2 electric fields..
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why is Saturn Velocity 9.7 km Per Second? Gerges francis
Paper Question
- Why Jupiter velocity =13.1 km per second?
- Jupiter needs by this velocity a period =10921 seconds to pass a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
- But
- 10921 km = The Earth moon circumference
- How this value can be used as 10921 seconds?
- The paper tries to discover some geometrical method to solve this question
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves)
Abstract
Time And Distance Values Can Be Equivalent In Higher Velocity
i.e.
Time & Distance Values Equivalence Is Occurred As A Relativistic Effect.
Briefly ….
When a particle moves with high velocity (near to light velocity), So this particle may suffer from the following effects:
1- Mass Increasing
2- Length Contraction
3- Time Dilation
4- Time & Distance Values Equivalence
Point No. 4 is my conclusion I have reach through The Solar Planets Data Analysis -
This paper tries to prove this fact that
(Time and Distance Values can be equivalent – In Higher Velocity)
My Research Basic Arguments (Part IV):
16th There's A Light Beam Travels With 1.16 Million Km/Sec
This paper tries to prove this fact
References
My Research Basic Arguments (Part I)
My Research Basic Arguments (Part II)
My Research Basic Arguments (Part III)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (II)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's an interaction between Earth and Jupiter Motions
The hypothesis Explanation
- What does mean "an interaction of motions"?
- I have searched for a suitable word to explain a dependency of motions data for both planets on one another - and I have choose the word "Interaction"
- Earth and Jupiter motions data depend on Each other – that means- I can write Jupiter motion detailed data by analysis Earth Motion Data –
- The paper will discuss that as deep as possible to prove this point of view
- But how does that happen?
- The "Interaction of Motions" disproves the description supposes that the solar planets are separated rigid bodies revolve around the sun, each planet creation and motion data is independent from the others. "This description is incorrect"
- The solar planets are created from one trajectory of energy (or from one light beam) which had created the planet and its orbital distance to be complementary with the other planets data to create the general harmony of motions – that means- the solar group is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of it
- "The Motions Interaction" is a method to examine the planets creation and motion data origin and to answer (how this data be created)?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)Gerges francis
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
Why Mercury Day Period = 4222.6 hours? (II)Gerges francis
-There's a light beam travels with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
-The Solar System is a puppets theater – the planets move together one unified motion as a train carriage
-The solar system unified motion depends on a period = 8 Mercury Day Periods =1407.6 solar days
-The planets unified motion main cycle (1461 days) depends on the period 1407.6 days (=8 Mercury Day Periods)
-The solar system is a machine moves to create different rates of time - so a planet cycle uses the second period to create the minute period –another cycle uses the minutes to create the hour period, and another uses the hours to create the solar day …..etc
- For example Mercury 8 days period (1407.6 solar days) is used as its rotation period (1407.6 hours) –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Light And Planet Motions Interactions (II)Gerges francis
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
We complete our discussion to answer this question
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
There's A Light Beam Travels With 1.16 mkm per sec (III)Gerges francis
More Proves For The Argument
" There's A Light Beam travels With 1.16 mkm/Sec",
1- The inner planets orbital distances can't be created if there's no light beam travels with 1.16 mkm/sec in the universe.
2- The distances between Jupiter and the inner planets can't be created if there's no light beam travels with 1.16 mkm/sec
3- Pluto can't be stayed in the solar system if there's no light beam travels with 1.16 mkm/sec
4- Shortly, the solar system without a light beam travels with 1.16 mkm/sec should be destroyed.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus Rotation Period Analysis (II) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Mercury motion is equivalent to 24 hours of the moon motion
- This rate of time (1hour =24 hours) is used in the solar system motion and because of that ( Venus & Uranus motions use this same rate
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar group is a clock, its basic task is to receive the energy of light motion for 1 second and by this energy causes a planet motion for 1 solar day – because of that the rate of time ( 1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- The question is, Why Does The Solar System Need Different Rates Of Time?
- The direct answer for this question is that (to create a configuration for the moon orbital motion during its day period)
- The moon apogee orbital circumference = 2550973 km, where the moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) be = 2598693 km
- This difference in 2 distances is found as a result of the geometrical mechanism by which the rate of time (1 h is equivalent to 24 hours) is created.
- Shortly, because of these 2 distances difference, the moon motion has to create the rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours) in comparison with Mercury motion – which causes Mercury Motion to lead the moon motion. the paper discusses this process geometrical details.
- Notice
- The rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours = 1 solar day) is a rate used in the solar system but –
- The rate of time between Mercury and the moon motions almost is (1 hour of Mercury Motion is equivalent to 2 days of the moon motion) means (1 solar day of the moon motion = a half of hour of Mercury Motion)
- This conclusion is added to the paper discussion after revision – in the paper discussion we have to discuss this rate also in addition to the basic one (1 hour =24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (III)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Planet Day Period Definition : The Period Through Which The Planet Moves A Distance = Its Circumference.
Paper Question No. (1)
Is There An Interaction Between The Earth Moon & Jupiter Motions?
- Because
- Jupiter Diameter 142984 = The Earth Moon Circumference 10921 km x 13.1
- Where
- 13.1 km /sec = Jupiter Velocity …………And
- 13.18 degrees = the Earth moon motion degrees per solar day
- Shortly
- Are these 2 values (13.1 and 13.18) created depending on each other
- Which proves an interaction between Jupiter & the Earth moon Velocities
Paper Question No. (2)
If This interaction is found, can it effect on both Planets Days Periods?
- The paper discusses these questions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)Gerges francis
This paper discusses Mercury Data to prove 3 conclusions which are:
1- The solar group is one machine, each planet is a gear in this same machine. (i.e. each solar planet depends on other solar planets in his Origin And Motion).
2- Mercury Data shows a relationship with Jupiter can't be explained by gravity concept or any current theory. (i.e. The Solar Group Current Theory Is Insufficient)
3- Special Theory of Relativity provides empirical results only and need a theoretical extension to be a complete theory. (Specifically, the theory needs to explain why the lorentz length contraction phenomenon is done and what geometrical effect it practices)
The paper also suggest the following idea
"The Time existence depends on relativistic effects"
i.e.
"Time Definition" is a process extends beyond the human daily experiences
This paper completes the previous discussion
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
Earth Motion
1- Abstract
Earth motion is one paper I have promised to write from years, just now I can do that!
Why have I promised but couldn't? ….the reason was the following…
- The moon orbital radius at total solar eclipse = 0.370 mkm, its circumference = 2.32 mkm = 58.6 x 40080 km (Earth Circumference)
- Now let's imagine:
- If the moon orbital circumference (2.32 mkm) is a great gear and the Earth circumference (40080 km) is a small gear …. Now let's these gears to rotate
- The great gear (2.32 mkm) needs to rotates (one time only), and that will causes the small gear to rotate 58.6 times, means Earth circumference will rotate around its axis 58.6 times but one rotation of Earth circumference means one solar day, so Earth will rotate (58.6 solar days).
- But ….Earth moves per solar day a distance = 2.58 million km
- 2.58 mkm x 58.6 days = 149.6 million km (Earth Orbital Distance)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
We still try to prove this same hypothesis we have suggested in the previous paper
Let's explain the proving process as simple as possible:
- I suppose there are 2 different rates of time in the solar system motion – Where (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – how to prove this hypothesis??
- We have 2 method to do that:
- (1st Method) to use Lorentz Transformation by creating Time dilation which enable different rates of time to be produced – but at first we need to prove that there are relativistic effects in the solar system and to define the high velocity motion which causes these relativistic effects – and I have proved that, there are relativistic effects in the solar system in my previous papers
- (2nd Method) to use the solar system geometrical necessities – let's explain this idea as possible in following:
o If there are 2 rates of time in the solar system as I claim, and if the solar system is one machine or one building as I suppose that means this one building has 2 rates of time
o That will necessitate to create the planets data in proportionality with both rates of time otherwise the machine can't work
o This is similar to use 2 different size gears in one machine, to do that, we have to uses some other gears their dimensions be in proportionality with BOTH gears otherwise the machine will not work…
o This is the idea I try to use, suggesting that, if there are different rates of time in the solar system, that necessities the planets data to be created in Proportionality with Both Rates of time – and because of that we can conclude there both rates of time by these planets data analysis
o This paper tries to prove that, the planets data are created by their values because (1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The moon moves with 2 different velocities – Why? ….Because
The moon is a light beam his velocity is The Light Known Velocity (0.3mkm/s)
And
The moon orbit is created of light beam also (Light Supposed Velocity 1.16 mkm/s)
The moon passing through his orbit causes light coherence, creating the matter to be created (The Moon Planet Creation)
i.e. The moon was a light beam before to enter his orbit around Earth and becomes A Planet moves by masses gravity when he enters the orbit
i.e. The Moon Moves By 2 Rates Of Time Because He Moves 2 Different Motions – Moves As A Light Beam And As A Planet.
What does prove the moon motion as a light beam?
10921 km (moon circumference) x 27.3 days (moon orbital period) = 0.3 mkm
This equation tells -If the moon rotates around his axis one rotation daily, he will pass during his orbital period a distance = light motion (0.3mkm/s) for 1 second!
10921 km (moon circumference) x 86400 seconds (solar day)= 940 mkm
This equation tells- If Earth revolves around the sun one complete revolution in 1 solar day – so the moon circumference will = its motion for 1 second
The equations geometrical mechanism is hard to be explained – but the light velocity effect is seen (And need deep discussion to discover it)
Abstract
I claim that Mars immigrated from his original Point at orbital distance =84 mkm to dwell in his point at orbital distance 227.9 mkm..
And this immigration causes the following results:
1- A disturbance for the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship (which is proven clearly from the solar planets order)
2- Pluto Immigration, because Pluto had to move to the Solar group End where he before belonged to the inner planets.
This study tries to prove these facts
Also I provide in this Study my suggested description for the solar group.
Introduction
The solar planets order tells us clearly that there's a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance… this conclusion we get easily from the following planets order:
Mercury – Venus – Earth..
The previous planets order tells us a clear rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Something was happened with Mars
After Mars this rule is reversed as we see in the following planets:
Jupiter – Saturn - Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The rule became "Planet Greater Diameter has A Shorter Orbital Distance"
(Please Note/ Uranus greater in diameter and less in Mass from Neptune that tells us the planets order depends on their diameters and NOT on their Masses)
What happened with Mars?
Mars immigration from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
Let's return Mars to his original point at orbital distance = 84 mkm
What the solar planets order will be:
Mercury – Mars - Venus – Earth..
This follows completely the rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Based on this description there are 2 planets at least immigrated from their original points:
1- Mars immigrated from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
2- Pluto who belonged before to the solar inner planets (my hypothesis) and had to move to the End of the solar group because the rule became reversed… \
This paper tries to prove these facts
To do that we have to prove the following:
1- Mars moved from his original point (Mars is exceptional Planet)
2- Pluto belonged before to the solar inner planets..
This paper contains 2 points
3- Mars Original orbital distance was 84 mkm
4- An Alternative Solar Group Description
Abstract
I claim that Mars immigrated from his original Point at orbital distance =84 mkm to dwell in his point at orbital distance 227.9 mkm..
And this immigration causes the following results:
1- A disturbance for the planet diameter and orbital distance relationship (which is proven clearly from the solar planets order)
2- Pluto Immigration, because Pluto had to move to the Solar group End where he before belonged to the inner planets.
This study tries to prove these facts
Also I provide in this Study my suggested description for the solar group.
Introduction
The solar planets order tells us clearly that there's a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance… this conclusion we get easily from the following planets order:
Mercury – Venus – Earth..
The previous planets order tells us a clear rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Something was happened with Mars
After Mars this rule is reversed as we see in the following planets:
Jupiter – Saturn - Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The rule became "Planet Greater Diameter has A Shorter Orbital Distance"
(Please Note/ Uranus greater in diameter and less in Mass from Neptune that tells us the planets order depends on their diameters and NOT on their Masses)
What happened with Mars?
Mars immigration from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
Let's return Mars to his original point at orbital distance = 84 mkm
What the solar planets order will be:
Mercury – Mars - Venus – Earth..
This follows completely the rule "Planet Greater Diameter has A Greater Orbital Distance"
Based on this description there are 2 planets at least immigrated from their original points:
1- Mars immigrated from his original point in 84 mkm to his new point in 227.9 mkm
2- Pluto who belonged before to the solar inner planets (my hypothesis) and had to move to the End of the solar group because the rule became reversed… \
This paper tries to prove these facts
To do that we have to prove the following:
1- Mars moved from his original point (Mars is exceptional Planet)
2- Pluto belonged before to the solar inner planets..
This paper contains 2 points
3- Mars Original orbital distance was 84 mkm
4- An Alternative Solar Group Description
We still analyze Jupiter Data - the paper tries to answer the following questions:
1.Why the three inner planets distances to Jupiter = their orbital circumferences but not accurately (with error 1%)?
Specifically
a.Venus Jupiter Distance 673 mkm = Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm
b.Earth Jupiter Distance 930 mkm = Earth orbital circumference 940 mkm (In this cases Earth and Jupiter should be at 2 different sides from the sun so 778.6 mkm +149.6 mkm = 930 mkm)
c.Mercury moves during its day period (175.94 solar days) a distance = 720.7 mkm= Mercury Jupiter distance
2.Do these 3 planets define their orbital circumferences depend on their distances to Jupiter? If yes, How?
3.Can Jupiter with the inner planets (including Mars) consist one system move together as a train carriages?
Paper Conclusions
I-There's A Light Velocity =1.16 mkm/Sec
II-Jupiter effects On The Inner Planets Periods Of Time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
There are relativistic effects in the solar group (proves)Gerges francis
The Main Hypothesis
"There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group"
We can't observe the higher velocity which produces these relativistic effects but we can observe the relativistic effects which are produced by it.
As proves for the relativistic effects, I may refer to the following:
1. The Earth Moon Motion …
2. Mercury Day Period…
The previous 2 phenomena should be discussed in this paper with many other as proves for the relativistic effects are found in the solar group geometry.
This Papers provides 2 Points
1st Point : The Relativistic Effects Proves
2nd Point : The Relativistic effects Geometrical Meaning and Description.
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Moon Orbital Distance Is Proportional To Its Parent Circumference
-This hypothesis is suggested by the previous observation, which are
o Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
o Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x circumferences
o Uranus moves during its day period a distance = 2.6 x circumferences
- This observations lead us to conclude that, Planet motion may depend on its circumference or the motion distance be function of the planet circumference..
- Then, the moon orbital radiuses analysis lead us to conclude this hypothesis, this paper tries to prove it
- By the hypothesis prove, many other old claims can be supported in addition, let's write them down here:
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Day Period (Short Discussion) (Part II)Gerges francis
We complete our discussion in the previous paper let's summarize its conclusion
Previous Paper Conclusion
- Before matter creation, the universe was created of light beam its velocity=1.16 mkm/sec
- The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) is the origin source of energy from which the matter and light known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) were created
- In some interaction (or coherence) process light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) was the only input and the output were light known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) and the matters – this interaction (coherence) process is occurred above Earth Axis – that means Earth was the First Matter is created in the universe.
- Because the motions are motions of light beams (different velocities of light) so the time and distance values simply are exchangeable with each other – that's why the equal values can be used in time or distance units…
Previous Paper Question
"Why Mercury Day Period =175.94 Solar Days?"
Paper Question
If There 2 Are Electric Fields In The Solar System, Is There Any Task Done By Their Cooperation?
The Sun Rays Production Is A Task Done By The 2 Electric Fields Cooperation
- I suppose that, the sun rays energy source isn't any nuclear interactions, instead, I claim, the solar planets motions energies total is the sun rays energy source.
- The sun rays production process is a task depends on all planets motions energies, So, if there are electric fields in the solar system, they will be discovered in this process…
- The sun rays basic condition is to create another rate of time, where (1day on the sun = 1 year on the Earth), and that means, the planets motions energies total during a complete year (in earth rate of time) will be used in one day (in the sun rate of time) and that will cause a great concentration of the total energy creating the sun rays (light wave) from mechanical motions energies (mechanical waves).
- In this paper we discuss the sun rays production details, trying to discover both electric fields found in the solar system
- Please remember, in the solar system I supposed that there are 2 electric fields, one in the inner planets which is found based on electric charges, and the second field is found in the outer planets is found by light beam out of which the planets matters are created, these 2 electric fields are created from one source which is Jupiter energy because Jupiter is the source of the solar system energy.. both electric fields are similar with only one difference which is that, the outer planets electric field suffers from (time dilation) because it depends on the light beam. The time dilation makes this electric field more slow in action and be insufficient to complete the required tasks… let's start to discuss our subject and extends our discussion about these 2 electric fields..
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
There's An Interaction Between Mercury And Jupiter Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
Mercury Motion is interacted with Jupiter Motion
That Means
Mercury Motion would be changed if Jupiter Motion changed even if no other change is occurred in the solar system.
Jupiter Motion also would be changed with any change in Mercury motion.
The interaction between Jupiter and Mercury Motions can't be explained based on the masses gravity forces
Mercury & Jupiter Motions Interaction proves that the planet motion is done depending on light motion
Where
The light motion is the distance creator and energy provider but the planet moves to follow the light motion
The Planet Motion Basic Rule "The Plant Passes The Same Distance Which Is Passed By Light Motion But With A Different Rate Of Time"
Mercury & Jupiter Motions Interaction proves this fact and shows the geometrical structure of the solar planets motions mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
- Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
That means
- Planet motion at least is a double motions – i.e. light and planet moves together
Or
- In more clear words – Plant motion is resulted from light motion –
That Means
- Light motion produces energy which planet uses for its motion – so planet motion is done depending on light motion
How to understand that??
- Is there a light beam moves with each planet?? NO
- The solar group is one machine (one train) – and there's one light beam moves and causes by his motion to move the whole solar group (the train) –
So
- Solar Planets motions are NOT several motions – on the contrary – it's only one motion – all solar planets move together in ONE Motion as a train (planets = Train carriages) – but for solar planets not all planets move by the same velocity that doesn't disprove the theory – the motion is one but the gears (Planets) move with different velocities
This paper tries to prove this fact
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Matter Creation Principle
The Matter is Created of Space Energy based on Lorentz length contraction phenomenon.
Principle Explanation:
- The matter is created of Energy as Equation E=mc2 tells us
- Space = Energy (My Hypothesis)
- Lorentz length contraction phenomenon (as relativistic effect) causes to concentrate the energy because the length contraction decreases the volume with the same energy content…
- The matter is created of energy based on quantized measurements – as we have seen in double production experiment – Gamma rays 1.2 Mev can produce electron and positron… but Gamma Rays 1 Mev can't because the matter production depends on quantized measurements
- So the Space Energy is concentrated by Length contraction effect but this concentrated Energy can't produce Matter unless the energy reach to the required quantum –
Based on this concept the solar planets are created depending on Energy of Pluto Motion Distance for 1 day –
This paper tries to prove this idea
Abstract
Solar Group Creation And Motion
(A description which this paper tries to prove)
1- The Solar System Is created of one energy only - this one energy travels through the solar group from point to another point – creating the planet matter (because E=mc2) and planet orbital distance (because Space = Energy- My Hypothesis).
2- The Solar System Main Energy starts from Jupiter and travels to Pluto (from this energy Neptune orbital circumference is created consuming 16% of the total energy)
3- Neptune reflects the rest of energy toward the inner planets into 2 equal trajectories of energy
4- The Energy is sent from Neptune (and Pluto) to Mercury
5- Energy is sent from Mercury to Saturn
6- Pluto Motion specifically for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second (where this moving light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec – my hypothesis) – that means – 1 second of light motion causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
7- Solar group is created based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day (solar planets diameters total = 406000km= Pluto motion for 1 solar day)
8- Planets motions energies accumulations with 2 other factor effects – lead to produce the sun light beams… these 2 factors are
a. The sun rate of time is different from Earth one
b. Jupiter Energy Interaction with the planets velocities total
9- i.e. Planets Motions energies total produce the sun rays based on changing the sun rate of time and the interaction with Jupiter energy
10- The produce light beam will be 0.3 mkm/second but the original one is 1.16 mkm/sec – for that – the value 0.3 will multiply with 4……(0.3x4 =1.2 mkm/sec from this value the original light beam 1.16 mkm/sec is produced) (Why it multiplies with 4 - because earth has a cycle of 4 years – 1461 days)
11- The final product will be 1.16 mkm/sec moves for 1 second only to repeat the cycle for tomorrow…
Mercury Motion During Its Day = Mercury Jupiter Distance. (Why?)Gerges francis
Abstract
-Mercury moves during its day period (175.94 solar days) a distance (720.7 mkm)= = Mercury Jupiter Distance
-Venus moves during its orbital period (224.7 solar days) a distance (670 mkm) = = Venus Jupiter Distance (error 1.5%)
-Earth moves during its orbital period (365.25 solar days) a distance = Earth Jupiter Distance (when Earth & Jupiter be at different sides from the sun 778.6 mkm +149.6 mkm = 929 mkm) (error 1%)
Why do The 3 Planets Move During Their Orbital Periods (Or Day Period) Distances = Their Distances To The Jupiter?!
My Answer Which I Try To Prove In This Paper.
-There's A Light Beam Its Velocity =1.16 Mkm/Sec
-This light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) creates the orbital and internal distances between all solar planets and Specially between (Jupiter, Mercury, Venus & Earth)
-The inner 3 planets (Mercury – Venus – Earth) are followers to Jupiter and they consist together one unified motion – that means- they are 3 carriages in one train and they move complementary motions to each other
-Jupiter is the guide and head of the 3 inner planets (Mercury, Venus & Earth) – Jupiter works as a reference for them (Specifically, Jupiter is the source of energy for these 3 inner planets).
Jupiter & The 3 Planets Data Prove, There's A Light Velocity =1.16mkm/Sec
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Earth moves Daily A Distance = The Moon Orbit CircumferenceGerges francis
The Moon Orbit Data shows A Geometrical Structure more complex than the Current theories can explain … Let's refer to it in following:
- Perigee Radius (R1) = Earth Moon Distance = 363000 km (Earth Nearest Point)
- Eclipse Radius (R2) = Earth Moon Distance = 377000km (Total Solar Eclipse Point)
- Average Radius (R3) = Earth Moon Distance = 384000 km (Registered Value)
- Apogee Radius (R4) =Earth Moon Distance = 406000km (The Most Far Point)
Earth Daily Motion 2.58 mkm = The Moon Orbit Circumference at apogee (R4)..why?
The Data
I. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee Point = The Outer Planets Diameters Total
II. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee Point = The Solar Planets Diameters Total
III. The Distance Between Perigee & Apogee Points = the inner planets Diameters total = Earth Circumference
IV. Earth Moon Distance (At Total Solar Eclipse Radius) = Saturn Circumference.
V. The Solar Planets Diameters Total = Saturn Diameter +2 Jupiter Diameters
The Moon Orbit Main Points: (Perigee - Solar Eclipse – Average- Apogee)
These points are defined based on the following geometrical rules:
1- (1st Rule) "R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1" (Pythagoras Rule)
2- (2nd Rule) "2πRn= (1/Rn+1)" (Reflective Values)
3- (3rd Rule) "(2πRn+1/ 2πRn) =1.0725" (Relativities Effects)
(We should prove these rules in this paper)
The Conclusions
1- The Gravity Force Can't Create The Moon Orbit
2- The Space is A Geometrical Player In The Solar Group Geometry
3- There are relativistic effects in the solar Group
4- The Relativistic effects cause geometrical rules control the general geometrical structure (i.e. the higher velocity creates specific form for the space in which it travels)
Paper Claim
1 Solar Day On The Sun = 365 Solar Days On Earth
- The Earth Moon Orbit regresses 19 Degrees Per A Year
- This Moon Regression causes to create a different rate of time. i.e. the moon regression causes 365 solar days to be used as 1 solar day only which creates 2 different rates of time
- Venus Motion per one solar day causes The Moon orbit regression for one year and by Venus effect on the moon orbit regression the different rates of time are created
- Venus effect on the moon orbit is a result of a general motion done by all solar planets together –
- Means, the moon orbit regression shows an effect of an unified motion done by all planets
- That may answer the old question, why the moon orbit data shows a general effect of all planets – for example
o (Perigee Radius = the outer planets diameters total) (error 1%)
o (Apogee Radius = the solar planets diameters total)
o The Distance between apogee and period (space only) = the inner planets diameters total = Earth Circumference.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels from Pluto to Earth Axis which creates the connection between Pluto on one side and Earth with her Moon on the other Side
Based on this connection Pluto and the Moon orbit effect on Solar Planets Creation Process
This hypothesis depends on
Solar System General Principle
-Solar group geometrical structure depends on energy of light beam motion (its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec) for one second period
-Light motion (1.16 mkm/sec) for 1 second period causes Planet to move for 1 solar day..
(Preprint No. 4) (There's A light Beam Velocity = 1.16 mkm per second)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 million km per second.
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis proves that a light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec must be found in the universe.
- Shortly, the solar planets data is created depends on a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec. And if this light beam isn't found the solar planets data can't be created.
Paper objective
- The paper provides and discuss the planets data which proves the hypothesis.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Is Created Based On Light Motions Gerges francis
Paper Theory
-The solar system is created based on light motions
-The planets orbital and internal distances are created by light beam motion from point to another
-As a light beam can be reflected between 4 or 5 mirrors - the solar system is created by reflection of a light beam from point to another – and by that – the solar system distances are created based on light motions
-the solar system is created by light motions and we see it as planets motions for some reason relative to our vision and not relative to the solar system nature
-shortly – the solar system distances are created by light motions
The paper tries to prove this fact
Paper hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity =1.16mkm/sec
Paper Primary Conclusion
Because we deal with high velocity motions, time and distance values become equivalent each other and can be used as exchangeable
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Light Effects On Plant Motion By Undefined Force Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-Light Motion Effects On Planet Motion By Undefined Force
The hypothesis Explanation
-The solar system motions can't be explained by Classical Machines Laws!
-Because Light motion effects on planet motion by undefined force, resulting all classical mechanics laws clearly be violated by planets motions.
Example No. (1)
o Jupiter velocity =13.1 km/sec, i.e. Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter, where 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference! And
o (Jupiter orbital circumference = Jupiter circumference x 10921)
o Uranus velocity =6.8 km, i.e. Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = 51118 km = Uranus diameter, where 7511 km = Pluto circumference
o (Uranus Pluto distance =Pluto velocity per solar day x 7511)
Example No. (2)
o 13.18 degrees = the moon motion degrees per solar day/ 0.526 degrees (Mars motion degrees per solar day) =25.2 (where Mars axial tilt =25.2 deg)
o (687 days Mars orbital period = 27.3 days the moon orbital period) x 25.2
Example No. (3)
o Light velocity (0.3mkm/sec) = Earth velocity x 10000 But
o 365.25 days (Earth year) x 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) =10000
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon orbital Motion Direction is defined based on the following factors:
1- Masses Gravity forces definition for the moon motion direction is correct.
But
2- The moon principle motion is done similar to Earth motion – i.e. a motion on straight line inclining with 0.985 degrees per solar day
3- Because Earth motion =2.58 mkm and moon motion becomes 2.41 mkm –this difference in velocities causes the motion in straight line to be seen in parabola
So – points 2 & 3 should be taken into consideration before using Masses gravity to define the moon orbital motion direction
4- Venus effect on the moon orbit causes its regression 19 degrees yearly and that effect on the moon orbital motion
5- Saturn and Uranus interaction effects on the moon orbital motion and defined the moon motion main points
That means
There are 5 factors effect on the moon orbital motion direction
The Solar System Creation and Motion Theory.pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Creation and Motion Theory
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
A Light Beam Its Velocity 1.16 mkm /Sec Be Found In The Solar System
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- Matter and space are created out of light beam, but matter doesn't spate its parent light beam but moves with it by using different rates of time
- The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Light Beam Its Velocity 1.16 million km per second
- The Solar Planets move one unified motion and use different rates of time for their motions – means- the second period of time is different from one planet to another
- The Solar Group be similar to a mechanical clock each planet motion defines part of Its Unified General Rate Of Time
- The planets orbital and internal distances be created in one network form depends on one geometrical design and not as individual distances. (The Solar System Distances Be Similar To A Chess Board)
- There's a continuum effect found through the solar system data as a result for its creation out of one light beam
- The light known velocity (0.3 mkm/s) is created based on the planets motions, later after the solar planets be created and moving –as a result we conclude – The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here use 4 planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
- By that, 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion –
- This definition of the time rates depend on a new suggested rule tells that (Equal Distances create different rates of time)
- The paper tries to prove that, these rates of time are fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theoryGerges francis
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
The increased availability of biomedical data, particularly in the public domain, offers the opportunity to better understand human health and to develop effective therapeutics for a wide range of unmet medical needs. However, data scientists remain stymied by the fact that data remain hard to find and to productively reuse because data and their metadata i) are wholly inaccessible, ii) are in non-standard or incompatible representations, iii) do not conform to community standards, and iv) have unclear or highly restricted terms and conditions that preclude legitimate reuse. These limitations require a rethink on data can be made machine and AI-ready - the key motivation behind the FAIR Guiding Principles. Concurrently, while recent efforts have explored the use of deep learning to fuse disparate data into predictive models for a wide range of biomedical applications, these models often fail even when the correct answer is already known, and fail to explain individual predictions in terms that data scientists can appreciate. These limitations suggest that new methods to produce practical artificial intelligence are still needed.
In this talk, I will discuss our work in (1) building an integrative knowledge infrastructure to prepare FAIR and "AI-ready" data and services along with (2) neurosymbolic AI methods to improve the quality of predictions and to generate plausible explanations. Attention is given to standards, platforms, and methods to wrangle knowledge into simple, but effective semantic and latent representations, and to make these available into standards-compliant and discoverable interfaces that can be used in model building, validation, and explanation. Our work, and those of others in the field, creates a baseline for building trustworthy and easy to deploy AI models in biomedicine.
Bio
Dr. Michel Dumontier is the Distinguished Professor of Data Science at Maastricht University, founder and executive director of the Institute of Data Science, and co-founder of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles. His research explores socio-technological approaches for responsible discovery science, which includes collaborative multi-modal knowledge graphs, privacy-preserving distributed data mining, and AI methods for drug discovery and personalized medicine. His work is supported through the Dutch National Research Agenda, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Horizon Europe, the European Open Science Cloud, the US National Institutes of Health, and a Marie-Curie Innovative Training Network. He is the editor-in-chief for the journal Data Science and is internationally recognized for his contributions in bioinformatics, biomedical informatics, and semantic technologies including ontologies and linked data.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Pluto Velocity Analysis
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
course student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 georgytawdrous@yandex.ru / mrwaheid@gmail.com
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 10th
December 2018
Abstract
Earth velocity daily (2.58 mkm) = Pluto velocity daily (0.406 mkm) x 2π
The previous relationship is found based on 2 reasons –at least- which are:
1- Earth and Pluto are the 2 ends of the solar group main energy trajectory.
2- Earth and Pluto Relationship is found through the moon orbit (Earth moon orbit)
This paper tries to prove these facts.
1- Introduction
Why Earth Velocity 2.58 mkm/ daily = Pluto velocity 0.406 mkm/ daily x2π?
To answer this question let's start with more easier question….
Why Earth velocity daily 2.58 mkm = The moon orbital circumference at apogee radius
(r=0.406 mkm) 2.58mkm?
This question we have discussed before
Let's summarize its answer in following…
The Moon Daily Motion
- The moon moves 2.58 mkm daily = Earth motion daily (otherwise they will be
separated from each other)
- If there's no relativistic effects in the solar system, the moon should be seen as a
bright stationary point in the sky because Earth and Moon move by the same
velocity.
But
- Because of the relativistic effects this value (2.58 mkm) will be contracted with the
rate 1.0725 to produce the value 2.41 mkm (Note please/ The length contraction rate
1.0725 we have discussed clearly in my previous paper)
- So the moon daily motion =2.58 mkm but this value is seen =2.41mkm (because of
lorentz length contraction phenomenon)
- The difference between both = 0.17 mkm which causes The Moon Daily
Displacement (0.17 mkm = 2 x 88000km)
- Why the difference 0.17 mkm = 2 x moon daily displacement 88000km? may that
occur because of the motions opposite directions.
For more details about this idea please review
The Moon Motion is A Relativistic Motion
Join to our session
https://www.academia.edu/s/c7a93d2219/the-moon-motion-is-a-relativistic-motiondoc
or
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0132
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-motion-is-a-relativistic-motion
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
Now let's consider our new question…
Why Earth Velocity 2.58 mkm/ daily = Pluto velocity 0.406 mkm/ daily x2π?
Or
Why Pluto Velocity 0.406 mkm/ daily = Earth moon distance at apogee radius
(r=0.406mkm)?
In more specifically form
Why Pluto velocity 0.406 mkm/ daily = (1/ The moon contracted velocity 2.41mkm)?
Which means
- Why Pluto velocity 0.406 mkm/ daily x The moon contracted velocity
2.41mkm = 1 mkm2
?
We should answer this question in this paper and also we should use this answer to conclude
an answer for another question which is
- Why Neptune Velocity 0.4665 mkm/ daily x Mars velocity 2.082
mkm/ daily = 1 mkm2
?
2- Methodology
I use the same method in all my researches, The Planet Data Analysis…
Let's explain the idea here again
In Pythagoras triangle we found that a2
+ b2
= c2
, this rule we can conclude from the triangle
data if its dimensions are 3, 4 and 5… so the data may show the geometrical rules….similar
to that, I use the solar planets data analysis to conclude the main geometrical rules which
explain the solar planets origin and motion…
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
3- Why Earth Velocity daily 2.58 mkm = Pluto Velocity Daily 0.406 mkm x 2π
3-1 Basic Relationships
I-Data
1- Pluto orbital distance 5870 mkm = Earth orbital distance 149.6 mkm x 4 π2
2- Pluto orbital period 90588 days = Earth orbital period 365.25 days x 8 π3
3- the rate between them = 8 π3
/4 π2
= 2π (Earth velocity / Pluto velocity)
II- Discussion
The previous data we have discussed in my previous paper
Pluto Data Shows a Relationship with Earth
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0036
3-2 Earth Axial Tilt And Pluto Orbital Inclination define The Solar Planet Orbital
Inclinations
I-Data
1- 23.6 degrees (The outer Planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 23.4 degrees
(Earth Axial tilt)
2- 17.4 degrees (The inner Planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 17.2 degrees
(Pluto orbital inclination)
3- (41 deg. solar planets orbital inclinations total /3.1 deg Jupiter axial tilt ) = (17.2 deg.
Pluto orbital inclination 1.3 deg. Jupiter orbital inclination)
II- Discussion
the rate 0.99 we have seen frequently in solar planets data, but still its geometrical meaning
isn't clear yet…
Any way, the previous equations No.1 and 2 help us to conclude the following meaning:
- Pluto Orbital Inclination is defined relating to the Inner Planets orbital inclinations
- Earth Axial tilt is defined relating to the outer Planets orbital inclinations
That means Earth with Pluto together are related to the whole solar group orbital
inclinations total.
Equation No.3
This equation tells important meaning because 41 degrees is solar planets orbital
inclinations total…the rest player in the equation are Jupiter and Pluto data…
Now Jupiter is the Solar Group Main Energy Source as we have discussed before… that
explain the crucial role which is done by Pluto in the solar group geometrical structure
(More explanation will be in Point No. 2 of this paper "the solar group geometrical
structure"
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
3-3 The Solar Group Main Equation (Of The Solar Group Energy)
I-Data
90000 mkm = 86400 mkm + 3600 mkm
a- 86400 mkm = (71)2
x 17.2 mkm
b- The value 3600 mkm should produce by contraction 0.406 mkm
c- 0.406 mkm /17.2 mkm = 1/7
II- Discussion
Equation no. a
86400 mkm = (71)2
x 17.2 mkm
In my previous paper we have discussed the relativistic effects in the solar group and we
have found that there are 2 basic high velocities produce relativistic effects (v1=0.99c,
v2=0.9999c) the first velocity produces length contraction rate =7.1 but the last one
produces a rate =71
So equation no. a tells us that the distance 86400 mkm is contracted 2 times to produce 17.2
mkm. Now we know that 1 million km = 1 degree in the solar group
(because mercury orbital circumference = 360 degrees and 360 mkm where the solar group
is one machine so any planet can use this same rate)
So the value 17.2 mkm can be equal 17.2 degrees (Pluto orbital inclination =17.2 deg).
Equation no. b
The value 3600 mkm should produce by contraction the distance 0.406 mkm!
This process we have discussed in my previous paper
solar Group main Equation
http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0186
let's summarize the idea
3600 mkm will be more useful if become 3600 seconds, I have supposed there's a light
beam moves with high velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
Now
1.16 mkm/sec x 3600 seconds = 2 x 2088 million km
But
2088 mkm = (71)2
x 0.406 mkm
So we have reach to the same rate but by some indirect way…
What we have?
2 distances are contracted by the same rate to produce 17.2 mkm and 0.406 mkm
respectively…
(0.406 mkm /17.2 mkm) = (1/7)
(1/7) is very important value in the solar group… not because Mercury orbital inclination =
7 degrees but basically because of the angle θ =1/7 degrees
("θ =1/7 degrees" is the main light coherence in the solar group from which the matter is
created… )
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
2-4 The Solar Group Main Equation (of Solar Group Geometrical Structure)
I-Data
179.9 degrees x 7 degrees = 1259.3 degrees2
but 1259 degrees x 0.406 degree= 511.1
degrees (solar planets axial tilts total)
II-Discussion
The previous equation is hard one… we need to discuss as deeply as possible
179.9 degrees
179.9 degrees = 177.4 deg. Venus axial tilt + 2.5 deg. Saturn orbital inclination
(this summation is found based on the close relationship between Venus and Saturn for
example Saturn diameter = Venus diameter x π2
, or Saturn orbital distance = (Venus
Circumference)2
…and many other relationships we have referred before)
7 degrees
Mercury Orbital Inclination
1259 degrees is the result…
511.1 degrees (solar planets axial tilts total)/ 0.406 degrees = 1259
We now 1degree = 1 mkm
So 0.406 mkm = 0.406 degree
The previous equation tells us the secret here…. The main player is the distance 0.406mkm
Because Earth moon distance (at apogee r= 0.406 mkm) = Pluto velocity daily …for that
reason Earth and Pluto velocities are related to each and based on that Earth orbital period
and distance are related to Pluto orbital period and distance…
So why this distance 0.406 mkm is so important… because it's The energy sent from Uranus
We should discuss that later… just we need to remember this equation
2-5 Why Pluto Velocity daily 0.406 mkm = Earth velocity daily /2π = 1/moon seen
velocity daily?
Shortly
Why Pluto velocity daily 0.406 mkm x the moon contracted (seen) velocity daily 2.41 mkm
= 1mkm2
?
This question we have discussed before with the moon orbit analysis, let's remember it:
(2nd
Rule) Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn= (1/Rn+1)
I-Data
km)million(InRRadiusOrbitalMoon
1
km)millionIn(RatnceCircumfereOrbitalMoon
n
n
- R1 = 363000 km (Perigee Radius) = 0.363 mkm Circumference= 2.281 mkm
- R2 = 377000 km (Total Solar Radius) = 0.377 mkm Circumference= 2.41 mkm
- R3 = 384000 km (Moon Orbital Radius) = 0.384 mkm Circumference= 2.58 mkm
- R4 = 406000 km (Apogee Radius) = 0.406 mkm Circumference= 2.754 mkm
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
From the previous data we can conclude that, the rule is true
(1/0.363 mkm) =2.754 mkm
(1/0.377 mkm) =2.63 mkm
(1/0.384 mkm) =2.58 mkm
(1/0.406 mkm) =2.41 mkm
II- Discussion
The previous data tells us that, the rule is performed correctly…
Specially the values 0.384 mkm and 0.406 mkm which show the rule perfectly….
(1/0.384 mkm) =2.58 mkm = 0.406 mkm x 2π
(1/0.406 mkm) =2.41 mkm = 0.384 mkm x 2π
The other values are working also in the moon orbit but we need to extend our
discussion to see that in better vision….we should do that in next points…
But here we have only one question ….which is:
Why moon orbital circumference multiplies with moon orbital radius = 1mkm2
?
Because
1million km2
is the defined energy from which the moon orbital different radiuses are
created.. it's similar to Neptune orbital distance… let's remember it here…
Neptune Orbital Distance = 4495.1 mkm =
= 50.3mkm (Mercury Venues distance) x 91.9 mkm (Mercury Earth distance)
=108.2 mkm (Venus orbital distance) x 41.4mkm (Venus Earth distance)
= 57.9 mkm (Mercury orbital distance) x 78.3 mkm (Earth Mars Distance)
We have noticed that before and asked why any 2 inner distances multiplies produce
the same value (Neptune orbital distance 4495.1mkm)?
The answer was because
i. The distance is Energy
ii. Neptune orbital distance is the energy source from which the inner planets
created their orbital and internal distances…
For more details please review
Solar Group Geometrical Structure http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
The question is the same….
Why multiplication of the moon orbital circumference with the moon orbital radius =
1million km2
?
Because this 1 million km2
is the source of Energy from which
the moon orbital different radiuses are created..
In which direction this 1 mkm2
is found?
xyz coordinates may help us to answer this question…the moon
orbital radius is perpendicular on the moon orbital circumference tangent.. so let's
suppose the radius is x and circumference tangent is y so… x y = 1 mkm ….why?
Because it's this "Z axis"
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
That means 1 million km2
is perpendicular on the xy plain….what does that mean?
The moon orbit source of Energy is perpendicular on the moon orbit plain? Why?
Because this is the sent energy from Uranus to the moon by which the moon built his
orbit and does his motion… Uranus is perpendicular on the moon orbit that's why the
source of Energy is perpendicular on the moon orbit…
Let's remember this idea here..
Light (with c velocity) travels from Uranus to Jupiter in 6939.75 seconds, this motion
produces the moon required Energy to rotates Metonic Cycle, so the energy is sent
from Uranus to Jupiter to the moon orbit (Perpendicular on the orbit plain) to acause
the moon motion based on the light motion but with different rate of time… so 1
seond in light motion will be 1 day in the moon motion which produces Metonic
Cycle 6939.75 days…
So Metonic Cycle is done because the moon orbit is built to perofm it, that'w why the
moon orbit regresses 19 degrees yearly.
The Conclusion:
The Moon Orbital Diameter =1 mkm works In 3 Directions As xyz Coordinates..
Let's return to our question
Why Pluto velocity daily 0.406 mkm x the moon contracted (seen) velocity daily 2.41
mkm = 1mkm2
?
Because Pluto and Earth are connected together by the moon orbit.. and why because the
moon orbit has the energy sent from Uranus…
The Energy from Uranus connected Pluto with Earth both of them are connected with the
moon orbit….
This answer is the same for the other equation
Neptune velocity daily 0.4665 mkm x Mars velocity daily 2.082 mkm = 1 mkm
That also because Neptune and Mars are connected together through the moon orbit
This information is the most important one ever …why
Because Neptune reflected the energy toward the inner planets into 2 trajectories
1st
trajectory of energy = 86400 mkm sent to Mercury
2nd
trajectory of energy = 86400 mkm sent to Venus and Earth…
And How Mars got his Energy.. we have discussed that deeply in the previous paper
Solar Group Geometrical Structure http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
but why Mars didn't receive the energy from Neptune directly as Earth, Venus and Mercy?
Because Mars immigrated from his orginal point at 84 mkm to his new one 227.9mkm
Mars Immigration Proves (Revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0268
"The Moon Orbit Analysis"
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0422
or
https://www.academia.edu/s/45a61dba6c/the-moon-orbit-analysis
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-orbit-analysis
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
2-5 The Precession Cycle Equation
I-Data
I- 25920 mkm = 0.3 mkm x 86400 seconds
II- 25920 mkm = (71)2
x 5.16 mkm
III- 17.2 seconds x 0.3 mkm/sec = 5.16 mkm
II-Discussion
25920 years = Precession Cycle
But
The light travels during the solar day a distance = 25920 mkm
Now this distance can be contracted by lorentz contraction with rate 71 for 2 times
producing the value 5.16 mkm and we know that 1 mkm = 1 degree
So 5.16 mkm = 5.16 degree but 5.1 degree is the moon orbital inclination
I wish it's clear that the moon effect is beyond his role around the Earth….
Equation No. III
Tells that, the value 5.16 is also related to Pluto data
If 17.2 degrees (Pluto orbital inclination) is used as 17.2 seconds…so the light with known
velocity 0.3mkm/sec will pass 5.16 million km through this period…
That again tells the relationship between the Moon and Pluto is beyond this small discussion
Just let's ask
Is it possible for the distance value to act as time value…? Yes we have discussed that
before
The Time Definition http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0523
2-6 Saros Cycle Equation
I-Data
1st
5040 days x 0.406 mkm/day = 2046.6 mkm (Jupiter Uranus distance)
2nd
3600 days x 0.406 mkm/day =1461.6 mkm
3rd
6858.39 = 232.7 (The inner planet axial tilts total) x 28.3 (Neptune axial tilt) = 278.4
(The outer planet axial tilts total) x 23.6 (the outer planets orbital inclinations total)
These equations we need to discuss in next paper because of their complexity…in next point
we should summarize the solar group geometrical structure basics
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
4-The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure
This idea provides 5 hypothesis as following
1st
Hypothesis
The Solar Group Is Created From One Energy
1st
Hypothesis Explanation:
1- Planet matter is created of Energy, (E=mc2
) supports that
2- Planet Orbital Distance (Space) is Energy also
3- Planet matter and orbital distance both are created from the same energy (will
be explained with 3rd
hypothesis)
4- The Solar Group Is Created Of One Energy Only (the original energy)
5- The solar group original energy is found before any Planet matter birth
6- The solar group is similar to one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point
on it.
7- The solar group also is similar to a great river has many canals and these canals
created soils on their banks…, so the river with canals and soils are of them are
created from the same water (the same energy)
8- The solar group is similar also to a creature body has different members, where
the same blood moves through these members to provide the needs.
This Hypothesis is discussed in following papers
Solar Group Geometrical Structurehttp://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
and
Definition of Space (Revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0307
2nd
Hypothesis
The Solar Group Is One Geometrical Structure
2nd
Hypothesis explanation:
1- The solar group original energy depends on geometrical rules (will be
explained with 4th
hypothesis)
2- Theses geometrical rules form together one geometrical structure
3- The solar planets form together one geometrical structure. Each planet is a part
of this same geometrical structure and performs a specific job or contribution
for this same geometrical structure. So all solar planets cooperate and integrate
together to produce this one geometrical structure.
4- The geometrical structure which is produced by the solar planets cooperation
and integration is the same geometrical structure which is produced by the
original energy geometrical rules. The original energy motion can be similar to
a painting drawn by a pencil, then the planets matters are created to move in
the same trajectory which can be similar to colours for this same painting but
the picture is the same (the motion trajectory is the same).
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
5- Each planet data is created to be suitable for this planet role or contribution in
the general geometrical structure.
6- There's no absent planet, that means the general geometrical structure is a
complete by the found 10 planets (because the original energy created planets
enough for the general geometrical structure)
7- Based on that, Solar Planets Data is in harmony with each other (and
complementary to each other)
8- The planet motion depends on the planet data and not on the gravity
9- Based on the solar planets data general harmony, the planets motions general
harmony is produced. And based on the planets motions general harmony,
Kepler 3rd
law is produced.
10- The general geometrical structure aims to pass the energy through the solar
group (the energy passing through the solar group is similar to the blood
passing through the creature body to provide the required energy)
This Hypothesis is discussed in following papers
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (Part No.2) http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0485
3rd
Hypothesis
The Planet mass and orbital distance is created from the same energy (Theory of
Matter Creation)
3rd
Hypothesis explanation:
1- In Young Experiment (Double Slit Expeirment), the light coherence produces
bright fringes and dark fringes
2- We see the bright fringes as matters (masses)
3- We see the dark fringes as distances (Space)
4- This explains the planet diameter and orbital distance relationships.
Why we see the bright fringes as matters? This will be answered in the following hypothesis..
This Hypothesis is discussed in following papers
Why The Light Is The Universe Highest Velocity?
http://vixra.org/abs/1801.0369
and
Special Relativity Hypothesis Reason (Matter Creation Theory)
http://vixra.org/abs/1801.0343
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
4th
Hypothesis
The solar group moves based on a physical law and not in chaos because of the
human mind effect on the universe (the planet motion and human knowledge
relationship)
4th
Hypothesis explanation:
1- The human mind contains electromagnetic waves (may travel by c velocity)
2- I suppose the realization process in human mind works by c velocity
3- Special Theory of Relativity tells us that, if there's a difference in velocity =c
between 2 observers each one will see the other as light beam… but if both
observers moves by c velocity there's no difference in velocity so both of them
will see the other as a matter
4- That's why we see the bright fringes as matters because our minds works by
this same velocity..
5- That answers why the planet moves by a physical law and no in chaos…
because the matter in the universe is created as an effect of the human mind on
the universe.
Note Please: the electric pulses moves slowly in the human body liquids because the
light moves slowly in the liquids, but the light will restore his velocity in vacuum…
which proves there's a motion with c velocity inside the human mind.. (Note also, the
realization process is the responsible for vision, that tells the effect on vision in fact is
effect on realization process!)
This Hypothesis is discussed in following papers
The Observer Effect On The Observation Results (Space = Energy=mc2)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0343
5th
Hypothesis
Earth Moon is The Solar Group Energy Motion indicator
5th
Hypothesis explanation:
1- The Solar Group Energy is reflected inside the moon orbit (to concentrate the
energy)
2- The reflected energy in the moon orbit can be similar to a sea of water and the
moon is a paper boat. That's why the moon is the energy motion indicator
3- The solar group energy is reflected in the moon obit with small values (shorter
distances) because of lorentz length contraction effect
4- There are relativistic effects in the solar group which enable the solar group
whole energy to be reflected in the moon obit to concentrate the energy
5- We can't observe the high velocity which produces the relativistic effects but
we can observe the relativistic effects in the planets different data
6- The relativistic effects cause the distances values to be seen in time values and
vice versa…
This Hypothesis is discussed in following papers
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
The Moon Orbit Analysishttp://vixra.org/abs/1811.0422
The Conclusions
1- The Solar Planets motions trajectory is a pyramid
2- The planet motion trajectory is a square and not an ellipse
3- The energy concentration in the moon orbit aims to produce the sun rays where
the sun rays are produced on the moon orbit energy
These Conclusions are discussed in following papers
The Solar Group Geometrical Structure is A Pyramid (Revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0060
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0135
The Author other Papers
The Moon Motion is A Relativistic Motion
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0132
Why Energy has Different Forms?
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0116
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0178
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0135
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
My papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous