Pluto data shows a relationship with earth
•
1 like•269 views
Earth Pluto Relationship disproves the solar group current theory And proves that the solar group is one geometrical structure
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason)
Metonic Cycle is Energy sent from Uranus to the moon
Pluto also effects on Metonic Cycle and that explains his data convenience with Earth and Moon Data
Solar system geometry (summarized discussion part 2)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Sun Rays Is Produced By Planets Motions Energies Accumulations
The paper tries to prove this fact
Solar Group Alternative Description
1- The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory …i.e.
2- The Solar Group is One Building and each planet is a part of this same building-
3- Also The solar group is similar to a train and each planet is a carriage of it.
4- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in it
5- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine, each planet is a gear in it
6- Planet moves with all other planets together as a train moves with all carriages –
Description Basic Concept
Planets cooperation and integration is the reason of their existence and motions.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy.. Can that be possible?
Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for same content, i.e. it's possible to create matter & space of energy
Another Example
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the experiment explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used (light)–outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data complementary to each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis shows the solar planets dependency.
Light And Planet Motions Interactions (II)
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
We complete our discussion to answer this question
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)
This document presents the author's research into the relationship between Mercury's day length, rotational period, and orbital period. The author claims these three cycles are related and depend on Jupiter and Uranus' distance. Tables of planetary data are provided, and the author aims to show connections between planetary motions using this data, in order to support their view that the solar system acts as a single interconnected machine. The methodology involves analyzing real planetary data and looking for relationships to formulate new geometric rules to describe the solar system.
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon(II)
We still discuss the question " Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Let's summarize the main idea:
- I suppose the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of this same building – based on this vision – each planet data is created relative and complementary to the other planets data – i.e. the solar system is Not Separated Planets From Each Other but one building connecting together-
This is my vision I have explained in (Part I) clearly –
But
- Suppose the respectful reader doesn't believe me – suppose he finds the one building vision is an illogical idea and can't be acceptable practically – how can I provide a logical question concerning the solar system vision?
- In these 2 papers I try to prove a clear claim which is "The Earth Moon Is Created By An Effect From Jupiter" – that means – the Earth moon diameter (3475km) should be changed if Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth Moon Creation process – Similar to that the Earth Moon Mass, Orbital Distance.......etc
i.e.
- I provide in both papers (Data Analysis) Only – and try to prove that – this (moon) data is created because of Jupiter Effect on the moon creation process – How this effect is done? This question is out of our papers scope – my basic job to prove that – this Data (The Earth Moon Data) can never be created Unless Jupiter effected on the Moon Creation process.
Now
- If the respectful reader refuses my conclusion – what will happen? Someone should answer the question "Can This Data Be Created Without Jupiter Effect?" If Not – So we have a point in our progress to prove that the solar system is one machine – where Jupiter Effect on the Earth Moon Data proves that the solar system can't be separated planets from each other.
References
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon? (I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km (Part 2) (Revised)
This Paper discusses the following hypothesis:
("2A" are needed for "1B")
The Previous Rule Controls The Solar Planets Basic Data
Hypothesis Explanation
It tells – all basic solar planets data are created based on the previous rule – we need 2 Equal Values to interact with 1 different Value…
Example (No. 1)
Solar Planets Diameters Total = 2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter
How To Understand The Previous Idea:
Solar Group Is One Trajectory of Energy – Each Planet Is A Point On It
a. The Planet Matter (Mass) is Created of Energy (E=mc2supports that)
b. The Planet Orbital Distance (Space) is Created of Energy (Hypothesis)
Solar Group can be similar to one machine each plant is a gear in it (or one body and each planet is a member of this same body)
The Solar Group is Created from only One Energy
The Solar Planets and their orbital distances are created depending on Each Other
The basic solar planets data are created based on this rule ("2A" for "1B")
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)
Paper hypotheses
- Light Motion For 1 Second causes Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day (my research 5th hypothesis)
- Planet Matter is created as a result of Planet motion
- Solar system matters are created by planet motion for 2 Solar Days
- Saturn orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 1 solar day ("The Train Motion Concept")
- Uranus orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 2 Solar Days
- That explains the theoretical reason behind Uranus and Saturn strong relationship
The moon geometry
The Moon Geometry
The Moon Data Analysis shows the following:
1- Earth-Moon is an unique planet in the solar group and not similar to any other moon in the group.
2- The Solar Planets are connected together geometrically
i.e.
3- The solar planets are created to be complementary to each other, all of them together consist one geometrical structure (as a triangle, square, or pyramid….)
That means
a. There was an original energy before any matter existence. And from this energy the planet matter is created (based on E=mc2) and the planet orbital distance is created (I suppose the space = Energy). This same energy also causes the planet motion as part of the general geometrical structure.
b. Each solar planet is a part of this same geometrical structure and has a specific job in it (that means no part is absent..! means the original energy created all required planets to form the required geometrical structure)
c. Each Planet Data is created to be suitable for the planet job in the general geometrical structure..
Recommended
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason)
Metonic Cycle is Energy sent from Uranus to the moon
Pluto also effects on Metonic Cycle and that explains his data convenience with Earth and Moon Data
Solar system geometry (summarized discussion part 2)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Sun Rays Is Produced By Planets Motions Energies Accumulations
The paper tries to prove this fact
Solar Group Alternative Description
1- The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory …i.e.
2- The Solar Group is One Building and each planet is a part of this same building-
3- Also The solar group is similar to a train and each planet is a carriage of it.
4- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in it
5- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine, each planet is a gear in it
6- Planet moves with all other planets together as a train moves with all carriages –
Description Basic Concept
Planets cooperation and integration is the reason of their existence and motions.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy.. Can that be possible?
Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for same content, i.e. it's possible to create matter & space of energy
Another Example
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the experiment explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used (light)–outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data complementary to each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis shows the solar planets dependency.
Light And Planet Motions Interactions (II)
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
We complete our discussion to answer this question
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)
This document presents the author's research into the relationship between Mercury's day length, rotational period, and orbital period. The author claims these three cycles are related and depend on Jupiter and Uranus' distance. Tables of planetary data are provided, and the author aims to show connections between planetary motions using this data, in order to support their view that the solar system acts as a single interconnected machine. The methodology involves analyzing real planetary data and looking for relationships to formulate new geometric rules to describe the solar system.
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon(II)
We still discuss the question " Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Let's summarize the main idea:
- I suppose the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of this same building – based on this vision – each planet data is created relative and complementary to the other planets data – i.e. the solar system is Not Separated Planets From Each Other but one building connecting together-
This is my vision I have explained in (Part I) clearly –
But
- Suppose the respectful reader doesn't believe me – suppose he finds the one building vision is an illogical idea and can't be acceptable practically – how can I provide a logical question concerning the solar system vision?
- In these 2 papers I try to prove a clear claim which is "The Earth Moon Is Created By An Effect From Jupiter" – that means – the Earth moon diameter (3475km) should be changed if Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth Moon Creation process – Similar to that the Earth Moon Mass, Orbital Distance.......etc
i.e.
- I provide in both papers (Data Analysis) Only – and try to prove that – this (moon) data is created because of Jupiter Effect on the moon creation process – How this effect is done? This question is out of our papers scope – my basic job to prove that – this Data (The Earth Moon Data) can never be created Unless Jupiter effected on the Moon Creation process.
Now
- If the respectful reader refuses my conclusion – what will happen? Someone should answer the question "Can This Data Be Created Without Jupiter Effect?" If Not – So we have a point in our progress to prove that the solar system is one machine – where Jupiter Effect on the Earth Moon Data proves that the solar system can't be separated planets from each other.
References
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon? (I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km (Part 2) (Revised)
This Paper discusses the following hypothesis:
("2A" are needed for "1B")
The Previous Rule Controls The Solar Planets Basic Data
Hypothesis Explanation
It tells – all basic solar planets data are created based on the previous rule – we need 2 Equal Values to interact with 1 different Value…
Example (No. 1)
Solar Planets Diameters Total = 2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter
How To Understand The Previous Idea:
Solar Group Is One Trajectory of Energy – Each Planet Is A Point On It
a. The Planet Matter (Mass) is Created of Energy (E=mc2supports that)
b. The Planet Orbital Distance (Space) is Created of Energy (Hypothesis)
Solar Group can be similar to one machine each plant is a gear in it (or one body and each planet is a member of this same body)
The Solar Group is Created from only One Energy
The Solar Planets and their orbital distances are created depending on Each Other
The basic solar planets data are created based on this rule ("2A" for "1B")
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)
Paper hypotheses
- Light Motion For 1 Second causes Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day (my research 5th hypothesis)
- Planet Matter is created as a result of Planet motion
- Solar system matters are created by planet motion for 2 Solar Days
- Saturn orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 1 solar day ("The Train Motion Concept")
- Uranus orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 2 Solar Days
- That explains the theoretical reason behind Uranus and Saturn strong relationship
The moon geometry
The Moon Geometry
The Moon Data Analysis shows the following:
1- Earth-Moon is an unique planet in the solar group and not similar to any other moon in the group.
2- The Solar Planets are connected together geometrically
i.e.
3- The solar planets are created to be complementary to each other, all of them together consist one geometrical structure (as a triangle, square, or pyramid….)
That means
a. There was an original energy before any matter existence. And from this energy the planet matter is created (based on E=mc2) and the planet orbital distance is created (I suppose the space = Energy). This same energy also causes the planet motion as part of the general geometrical structure.
b. Each solar planet is a part of this same geometrical structure and has a specific job in it (that means no part is absent..! means the original energy created all required planets to form the required geometrical structure)
c. Each Planet Data is created to be suitable for the planet job in the general geometrical structure..
The solar day production
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
Is There A Parallel Universe
Paper Hypothesis
The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
We see the planet moves and thinks that the planet moves by the masses gravity forces – but in fact there's a light beam moves behind the planet and this light motion causes the planet motion-
Think about the Water wheel deeply and carefully –The water wheel is formed in a circle form has edges – and the water wheel is fixed by axis provides the chance for the water wheel to rotate around its axis
Now
The water moves on the ground in one direction pushing the water wheel edges and caused the water wheel to be rotated around its axis –
Here we have 2 motions
The water motion and the water wheel motion – both are in different directions – one motion is continuous and directed in one direction (the water) and the other motion is rotation motion around axis (the water wheel)
The water motion expresses the light motion and the water wheel motion expresses The Planet Motion –
So We Have 2 Parallel Motions - That's Why We Have 2 Parallel Universes
But we realize that these 2 motions depend on the water motion (the light motion) – that because the light motion is the distance creator and energy provider – where the planet motion is a result of the light motion
The paper tries to prove this fact.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)
Paper hypothesis
-The Moon Orbital Distance Is Proportional To Its Parent Circumference
-This hypothesis is suggested by the previous observation, which are
o Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
o Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x circumferences
o Uranus moves during its day period a distance = 2.6 x circumferences
- This observations lead us to conclude that, Planet motion may depend on its circumference or the motion distance be function of the planet circumference..
- Then, the moon orbital radiuses analysis lead us to conclude this hypothesis, this paper tries to prove it
- By the hypothesis prove, many other old claims can be supported in addition, let's write them down here:
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Direction Of Energy Through The Solar Group
- The Solar Group Main Energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – This energy sending is continued for 2 sequence solar days
- Neptune used Jupiter Sent Energy consuming 16% of this total energy and the rest of Energy Neptune reflected it toward the inner planets into 2 Energy Trajectories.
o 1st Trajectory is sent to Earth (will be discussed Point No.4)
o 2nd Trajectory is sent to Mercury
- The 1st Trajectory of Energy is reached to Earth (with 86400mkm) – Where Earth reflected this energy into 2 new parts
o Part 1 the energy is sent from Earth to Venus
o Part 2 the energy is sent from Earth to (Jupiter & Uranus)
- The total energy (90000mkm) proves that all energy gathered together on one point only and no contradiction is found…
This explanation shows that the energy passes in cycle through the solar group
The previous idea supports my claim:
- The Solar Group is One Trajectory Of Energy and each planet is appoint on this same energy trajectory….. or
- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building …..and
- No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. Or, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
Kepler 3rd law explanation part no.2 (to support my claim against nobel priz...
Kepler 3rd Law tells that
(d3/t2) = constant where (d= Planet orbital distance, and t= Planet orbital period)
Why (d3/t2) = constant?
Because…
d3 is Energy In Space Form
t2 is Energy In Mass Form
Kepler 3rd Law supports my claim.. That
The solar group is one machine or one body each planet is a member in this body
That tells us
From the same energy the planet matter and his orbital distance are created which provides one source for the whole solar group and guarantees the Planets Motions General Harmony…
This paper aims to support my claim against the Nobel Prize board decision- in physics -2018)
This claim details are written in my previous paper
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
Jupiter Effect On Pluto Motion
Paper Basic Question
Why do we analyze Jupiter Data and effect on different Planets?
Because
I try to prove that,
-The planets motions are light motions but we see them motions in planets motions form
-It's a light beam which causes the planets to move in front of us in the sky
-There's no gravity from the sun, there's no Big Bang theory – No more imaginations
-It's A Light Beam Motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Matter creation principle (part ii)
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
Pluto Motion For One Solar Day depends On energy of light motion for 1 second (light velocity= 1.16 mkm /sec)
(2)
Earth Moon is Created relative to Light Energy (i.e. relative to light velocity)
(3)
Pluto and Earth Moon are basic players in Solar Planets Diameters Creation Process
The paper tries to prove these hypotheses
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion (As A Train Motion)
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion
(As A Train Motion)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Move In One General Motion (As A Train Motion)
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Solar Group Is Similar to One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Building (or solar group is similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it)
- Planets Motions is done As One Unified Motion
- As a train moves with all its carriages – similar to that – solar group moves one unified motion with all planets together
- Although Planets Velocities Are Different from each other – that – can't disprove this theory –because – as in any machine of gears – the different velocities of gears consist together the machine one general motion
This paper tries to prove this fact
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason) (revised)
The document discusses the relationship between Jupiter and Uranus and how it relates to the Metonic cycle. It provides 10 points of data showing connections between Jupiter-Uranus distance, Earth-Pluto distances and periods, and velocities. It claims the Metonic cycle depends on the Jupiter-Uranus distance based on data correlations within a framework that the solar system planets are interconnected by a common underlying energy or geometry.
Mercury velocity
Abstract
Solar Data Analysis tells us that…… Mercury has 2 velocities
1st Velocity = 47.4 km/sec which is registered in NASA Planetary Fact Sheet
2nd Velocity= 47.8 km/sec which is necessary velocity to cover Mercury Orbital Circumference 57.9 mkm x 2π= 364 mkm in Mercury Orbital Period 88 days
The difference between both velocities = 1%
Why are there 2 velocities for the same Planet? And how that can be possible?
This question is similar to the old question concerning Newton 3rd Law "why for Each Action there's reaction equal in value and opposite in direction? In brief… why the forces are created in double?
Planet Orbital Period Definition (II)
Previous Paper Conclusion
-Planets Cycles Periods are defined relative to each other.
Example
-Mercury & Venus Cycles Periods interacted with each other, creating an effect on Earth Moon Cycles and causing that, The Moon Orbital Period to be equal Its Rotation Period (27.3 days)
-This effect of Mercury and Venus, on Earth Moon Cycles Periods, is a general effect on the solar system, and be seen also on the outer planets cycles periods
-A result of that, The Outer Planets Days Periods Are = Their Rotations Periods – this is found Because Earth Moon Orbital Period = Its Rotation Period =27.3 days
A Proof
-The Outer Planets Rotation Periods Total =(Earth Moon Rotation Period /Π)
(Planets Cycles Periods, Means, Planet Orbital Period, Planet Rotation Period And Planet Day Period)
Paper Objective
-This paper provides more proves for the claim that "The Outer Planets Rotations Periods Are Found Depending On Earth Moon Rotation Period"
Neptune data shows the solar group geometry
Research Paper
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
Abstract
Neptune Data supports the following conclusions:
1- The solar group is created from one energy only
2- The solar group is built by one geometrical structure and each planet is a part in this geometrical structure (or the solar group is a body and each planet is a member in it)
3- This geometrical structure causes to produce all solar planets data to be suitable for its job in this geometrical structure (which guarantees the planets motions harmony)
4- The solar planet motion real trajectory is square but we see it as an ellipse because of the moon orbit geometrical effect.
5- The Metonic Cycle (6939.75 days) is a motion in a vertical level relative to the solar inner planets horizontal level.
6- The moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees is done because of Neptune and Uranus effect on the moon orbit geometrical structure.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
A light beam with velocity (1.16 mkm per sec), creates the solar system
Abstract
-There are 2 light velocities in the solar system (1.16 mkm/sec & 0.3 mkm/sec)
-Because of the high velocity motions, time & distance values are equivalent
Example No. I
Let's see how the solar system is created in following:
- Mercury is created by a period of time =50 seconds
-Light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec travels for 50 seconds a distance =58 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance (=360 mkm Mercury orbital circumference)
-360 mkm -because of high velocity motion – is used as 360 seconds
-Light beam with velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) during 360 seconds travels a distance = =108 mkm = Venus Orbital Distance
-216.4 mkm (Venus Orbital Diameter) is a distance passed by light beam its velocity 0.3 mkm/sec during a period =720 seconds
-720 seconds is used as a distance =720 mkm = Mercury Jupiter distance –
-Mercury Jupiter diameter (720 mkm x 2) needs a period = 720 seconds x 2 which needs a distance = 216.4 x 2 mkm
-(the distance 216.4 mkm x 2) is used as a time period in the following equation: 216.4x 2 x 1.16 mkm/s= 500 mkm (500 mkm is used as a time period= 500s)
-Light beam ( 0.3 mkm/sec) needs 500 s to pass Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm)
-Still the distance 720 mkm is produced by a light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) during a period = 627 seconds (Example No. I is discussed deeply in this paper)
Conclusion
(1st) There's a light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(2nd) The solar system is created depending on light motions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar group general description
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid (revised)
The Solar Group Is A Pyramid
Abstract
Let's explain this idea in following:
- The sun is found on the Pyramid Apex
- Each Planet is found on different level which makes the solar group as a ladder
- The planets (Mercury - Saturn - Neptune – Pluto) form the Pyramid Base
- The players (The sun – Earth – Moon – Mars) form the pyramid Height (The Pyramid Main Column)
- The rest planets form the Pyramid walls
- The pyramid is consisted by the planets motions
i.e.
- The Pyramid Is The Solar Planets Motions Trajectory…
- The Pyramid Base and Height consist from different planets levels on the ladder…
Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
The Research Presentation (Revised) (III)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The solar planets motions data analysis shows that the planets motions use different rates of time. As a result (for example) 1 h of Mercury motion = 24.6 h of Jupiter motion.
- The planets motions use different rates of time because they revolve their revolutions around the sun in equal periods of time.
- They need to revolve around the sun in equal periods of time because the planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion and the equal periods of time is necessary for the planets motions timing adjustments.
- This Vision Is Different From Newton Theory
- Based on that, we have a reason to refute Newton theory of the sun mass gravity.
- The situation is a complex because
- Newton theory is lived since four centuries and has a great effect.
- On the other side, The Planets Motions Data Analysis Shows A Complete Different Vision From Newton Theory And Ideas.
- I have used this paper Introduction to put the theoretical comparison between the 2 visions, trying to make them as clear as possible.
- The Paper Is Divided Into 3 Basic Subjects
- (1st Subject)
- The Theoretical Comparison Between The 2 Visions Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planets Motions Data Analysis – This Comparison Is Provided In This Paper INTRODUCTION. And This Comparison Summarizes The Paper Theoretical Argument
- (2nd Subject)
- The Planets Motions Data Analysis Be Provided In Part No. (I) Of This Paper
- (3rd Subject)
- The Solar Planets Creation Theory Be Provided In Part No. (II) Of This Paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Geometry (Part I)
- The document presents a theory that the solar system was created by light in the same way that electrons and positrons are produced from gamma rays according to Carl Anderson's 1932 experiment.
- Specifically, the theory claims that the Earth acts as a "big electron" while the planets Mercury, Venus, Moon, and Mars together act as a "big positron." Their interaction is proposed to explain the motions and attractions of the inner planets.
- To prove this theory, the document will analyze data about the inner and outer planets to show they can be distinguished in categories consistent with the theory - namely, distinguishing the Earth from the other four inner planets, and showing the outer planets are dependent on the inner planets.
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Pluto velocity analysis
Earth velocity daily (2.58 mkm) = Pluto velocity daily (0.406 mkm) x 2π
The previous relationship is found based on 2 reasons –at least- which are:
1- Earth and Pluto are the 2 ends of the solar group main energy trajectory.
2- Earth and Pluto Relationship is found through the moon orbit (Earth moon orbit)
This paper tries to prove these facts.
More Related Content
What's hot
The solar day production
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
Is There A Parallel Universe
Paper Hypothesis
The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
We see the planet moves and thinks that the planet moves by the masses gravity forces – but in fact there's a light beam moves behind the planet and this light motion causes the planet motion-
Think about the Water wheel deeply and carefully –The water wheel is formed in a circle form has edges – and the water wheel is fixed by axis provides the chance for the water wheel to rotate around its axis
Now
The water moves on the ground in one direction pushing the water wheel edges and caused the water wheel to be rotated around its axis –
Here we have 2 motions
The water motion and the water wheel motion – both are in different directions – one motion is continuous and directed in one direction (the water) and the other motion is rotation motion around axis (the water wheel)
The water motion expresses the light motion and the water wheel motion expresses The Planet Motion –
So We Have 2 Parallel Motions - That's Why We Have 2 Parallel Universes
But we realize that these 2 motions depend on the water motion (the light motion) – that because the light motion is the distance creator and energy provider – where the planet motion is a result of the light motion
The paper tries to prove this fact.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)
Paper hypothesis
-The Moon Orbital Distance Is Proportional To Its Parent Circumference
-This hypothesis is suggested by the previous observation, which are
o Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
o Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x circumferences
o Uranus moves during its day period a distance = 2.6 x circumferences
- This observations lead us to conclude that, Planet motion may depend on its circumference or the motion distance be function of the planet circumference..
- Then, the moon orbital radiuses analysis lead us to conclude this hypothesis, this paper tries to prove it
- By the hypothesis prove, many other old claims can be supported in addition, let's write them down here:
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Direction Of Energy Through The Solar Group
- The Solar Group Main Energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – This energy sending is continued for 2 sequence solar days
- Neptune used Jupiter Sent Energy consuming 16% of this total energy and the rest of Energy Neptune reflected it toward the inner planets into 2 Energy Trajectories.
o 1st Trajectory is sent to Earth (will be discussed Point No.4)
o 2nd Trajectory is sent to Mercury
- The 1st Trajectory of Energy is reached to Earth (with 86400mkm) – Where Earth reflected this energy into 2 new parts
o Part 1 the energy is sent from Earth to Venus
o Part 2 the energy is sent from Earth to (Jupiter & Uranus)
- The total energy (90000mkm) proves that all energy gathered together on one point only and no contradiction is found…
This explanation shows that the energy passes in cycle through the solar group
The previous idea supports my claim:
- The Solar Group is One Trajectory Of Energy and each planet is appoint on this same energy trajectory….. or
- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building …..and
- No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. Or, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
Kepler 3rd law explanation part no.2 (to support my claim against nobel priz...
Kepler 3rd Law tells that
(d3/t2) = constant where (d= Planet orbital distance, and t= Planet orbital period)
Why (d3/t2) = constant?
Because…
d3 is Energy In Space Form
t2 is Energy In Mass Form
Kepler 3rd Law supports my claim.. That
The solar group is one machine or one body each planet is a member in this body
That tells us
From the same energy the planet matter and his orbital distance are created which provides one source for the whole solar group and guarantees the Planets Motions General Harmony…
This paper aims to support my claim against the Nobel Prize board decision- in physics -2018)
This claim details are written in my previous paper
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
Jupiter Effect On Pluto Motion
Paper Basic Question
Why do we analyze Jupiter Data and effect on different Planets?
Because
I try to prove that,
-The planets motions are light motions but we see them motions in planets motions form
-It's a light beam which causes the planets to move in front of us in the sky
-There's no gravity from the sun, there's no Big Bang theory – No more imaginations
-It's A Light Beam Motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Matter creation principle (part ii)
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
Pluto Motion For One Solar Day depends On energy of light motion for 1 second (light velocity= 1.16 mkm /sec)
(2)
Earth Moon is Created relative to Light Energy (i.e. relative to light velocity)
(3)
Pluto and Earth Moon are basic players in Solar Planets Diameters Creation Process
The paper tries to prove these hypotheses
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion (As A Train Motion)
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion
(As A Train Motion)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Move In One General Motion (As A Train Motion)
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Solar Group Is Similar to One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Building (or solar group is similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it)
- Planets Motions is done As One Unified Motion
- As a train moves with all its carriages – similar to that – solar group moves one unified motion with all planets together
- Although Planets Velocities Are Different from each other – that – can't disprove this theory –because – as in any machine of gears – the different velocities of gears consist together the machine one general motion
This paper tries to prove this fact
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason) (revised)
The document discusses the relationship between Jupiter and Uranus and how it relates to the Metonic cycle. It provides 10 points of data showing connections between Jupiter-Uranus distance, Earth-Pluto distances and periods, and velocities. It claims the Metonic cycle depends on the Jupiter-Uranus distance based on data correlations within a framework that the solar system planets are interconnected by a common underlying energy or geometry.
Mercury velocity
Abstract
Solar Data Analysis tells us that…… Mercury has 2 velocities
1st Velocity = 47.4 km/sec which is registered in NASA Planetary Fact Sheet
2nd Velocity= 47.8 km/sec which is necessary velocity to cover Mercury Orbital Circumference 57.9 mkm x 2π= 364 mkm in Mercury Orbital Period 88 days
The difference between both velocities = 1%
Why are there 2 velocities for the same Planet? And how that can be possible?
This question is similar to the old question concerning Newton 3rd Law "why for Each Action there's reaction equal in value and opposite in direction? In brief… why the forces are created in double?
Planet Orbital Period Definition (II)
Previous Paper Conclusion
-Planets Cycles Periods are defined relative to each other.
Example
-Mercury & Venus Cycles Periods interacted with each other, creating an effect on Earth Moon Cycles and causing that, The Moon Orbital Period to be equal Its Rotation Period (27.3 days)
-This effect of Mercury and Venus, on Earth Moon Cycles Periods, is a general effect on the solar system, and be seen also on the outer planets cycles periods
-A result of that, The Outer Planets Days Periods Are = Their Rotations Periods – this is found Because Earth Moon Orbital Period = Its Rotation Period =27.3 days
A Proof
-The Outer Planets Rotation Periods Total =(Earth Moon Rotation Period /Π)
(Planets Cycles Periods, Means, Planet Orbital Period, Planet Rotation Period And Planet Day Period)
Paper Objective
-This paper provides more proves for the claim that "The Outer Planets Rotations Periods Are Found Depending On Earth Moon Rotation Period"
Neptune data shows the solar group geometry
Research Paper
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
Abstract
Neptune Data supports the following conclusions:
1- The solar group is created from one energy only
2- The solar group is built by one geometrical structure and each planet is a part in this geometrical structure (or the solar group is a body and each planet is a member in it)
3- This geometrical structure causes to produce all solar planets data to be suitable for its job in this geometrical structure (which guarantees the planets motions harmony)
4- The solar planet motion real trajectory is square but we see it as an ellipse because of the moon orbit geometrical effect.
5- The Metonic Cycle (6939.75 days) is a motion in a vertical level relative to the solar inner planets horizontal level.
6- The moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees is done because of Neptune and Uranus effect on the moon orbit geometrical structure.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
A light beam with velocity (1.16 mkm per sec), creates the solar system
Abstract
-There are 2 light velocities in the solar system (1.16 mkm/sec & 0.3 mkm/sec)
-Because of the high velocity motions, time & distance values are equivalent
Example No. I
Let's see how the solar system is created in following:
- Mercury is created by a period of time =50 seconds
-Light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec travels for 50 seconds a distance =58 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance (=360 mkm Mercury orbital circumference)
-360 mkm -because of high velocity motion – is used as 360 seconds
-Light beam with velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) during 360 seconds travels a distance = =108 mkm = Venus Orbital Distance
-216.4 mkm (Venus Orbital Diameter) is a distance passed by light beam its velocity 0.3 mkm/sec during a period =720 seconds
-720 seconds is used as a distance =720 mkm = Mercury Jupiter distance –
-Mercury Jupiter diameter (720 mkm x 2) needs a period = 720 seconds x 2 which needs a distance = 216.4 x 2 mkm
-(the distance 216.4 mkm x 2) is used as a time period in the following equation: 216.4x 2 x 1.16 mkm/s= 500 mkm (500 mkm is used as a time period= 500s)
-Light beam ( 0.3 mkm/sec) needs 500 s to pass Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm)
-Still the distance 720 mkm is produced by a light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) during a period = 627 seconds (Example No. I is discussed deeply in this paper)
Conclusion
(1st) There's a light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(2nd) The solar system is created depending on light motions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar group general description
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid (revised)
The Solar Group Is A Pyramid
Abstract
Let's explain this idea in following:
- The sun is found on the Pyramid Apex
- Each Planet is found on different level which makes the solar group as a ladder
- The planets (Mercury - Saturn - Neptune – Pluto) form the Pyramid Base
- The players (The sun – Earth – Moon – Mars) form the pyramid Height (The Pyramid Main Column)
- The rest planets form the Pyramid walls
- The pyramid is consisted by the planets motions
i.e.
- The Pyramid Is The Solar Planets Motions Trajectory…
- The Pyramid Base and Height consist from different planets levels on the ladder…
Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
The Research Presentation (Revised) (III)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The solar planets motions data analysis shows that the planets motions use different rates of time. As a result (for example) 1 h of Mercury motion = 24.6 h of Jupiter motion.
- The planets motions use different rates of time because they revolve their revolutions around the sun in equal periods of time.
- They need to revolve around the sun in equal periods of time because the planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion and the equal periods of time is necessary for the planets motions timing adjustments.
- This Vision Is Different From Newton Theory
- Based on that, we have a reason to refute Newton theory of the sun mass gravity.
- The situation is a complex because
- Newton theory is lived since four centuries and has a great effect.
- On the other side, The Planets Motions Data Analysis Shows A Complete Different Vision From Newton Theory And Ideas.
- I have used this paper Introduction to put the theoretical comparison between the 2 visions, trying to make them as clear as possible.
- The Paper Is Divided Into 3 Basic Subjects
- (1st Subject)
- The Theoretical Comparison Between The 2 Visions Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planets Motions Data Analysis – This Comparison Is Provided In This Paper INTRODUCTION. And This Comparison Summarizes The Paper Theoretical Argument
- (2nd Subject)
- The Planets Motions Data Analysis Be Provided In Part No. (I) Of This Paper
- (3rd Subject)
- The Solar Planets Creation Theory Be Provided In Part No. (II) Of This Paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Geometry (Part I)
- The document presents a theory that the solar system was created by light in the same way that electrons and positrons are produced from gamma rays according to Carl Anderson's 1932 experiment.
- Specifically, the theory claims that the Earth acts as a "big electron" while the planets Mercury, Venus, Moon, and Mars together act as a "big positron." Their interaction is proposed to explain the motions and attractions of the inner planets.
- To prove this theory, the document will analyze data about the inner and outer planets to show they can be distinguished in categories consistent with the theory - namely, distinguishing the Earth from the other four inner planets, and showing the outer planets are dependent on the inner planets.
What's hot (20)
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)
Kepler 3rd law explanation part no.2 (to support my claim against nobel priz...
Kepler 3rd law explanation part no.2 (to support my claim against nobel priz...
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion (As A Train Motion)
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion (As A Train Motion)
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason) (revised)
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason) (revised)
A light beam with velocity (1.16 mkm per sec), creates the solar system
A light beam with velocity (1.16 mkm per sec), creates the solar system
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid (revised)
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid (revised)
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Similar to Pluto data shows a relationship with earth
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Pluto velocity analysis
Earth velocity daily (2.58 mkm) = Pluto velocity daily (0.406 mkm) x 2π
The previous relationship is found based on 2 reasons –at least- which are:
1- Earth and Pluto are the 2 ends of the solar group main energy trajectory.
2- Earth and Pluto Relationship is found through the moon orbit (Earth moon orbit)
This paper tries to prove these facts.
Is There A Parallel Universe (III)
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theory
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Definition of space
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
Uranus Orbital Period Analysis (IV)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- There's a rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 1 solar day) is used in the solar system motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Earth moves during its day period a distance = 2.573 mkm = Pluto motion distance during its day period (error 1%)
- The paper claims, the previous data is found because Earth and Pluto motions are used to create the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
- That means, 1 hour of Earth motion = 24 hours of Pluto motion
- This rate needs Mercury, Venus and the moon cooperation to be created.
- This idea can be supported by the fact that (The moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) =2.573 mkm = Earth motion distance during its day = Pluto motion distance during its day period (153.3 hours)
- The rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a proof for the motion transportation through the solar planets – that means- the motion is transported from a planet to another planet as among gears.
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the creation of the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (III)
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (III)
Abstract
- What relationship is found between Jupiter and the Moon Motions?
- The data shows some very deep relationship but no physical reason we can find behind this relationship – let's provide some data as examples
o Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance =142984 km = Jupiter Diameter
o Where the Earth moon Circumference =10921 km
o 4900 mkm (orbital Jupiter Circumference) = 10921 km x 449197 km (Jupiter Circumference).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Matter Creation Principle
Matter Creation Principle
The Matter is Created of Space Energy based on Lorentz length contraction phenomenon.
Principle Explanation:
- The matter is created of Energy as Equation E=mc2 tells us
- Space = Energy (My Hypothesis)
- Lorentz length contraction phenomenon (as relativistic effect) causes to concentrate the energy because the length contraction decreases the volume with the same energy content…
- The matter is created of energy based on quantized measurements – as we have seen in double production experiment – Gamma rays 1.2 Mev can produce electron and positron… but Gamma Rays 1 Mev can't because the matter production depends on quantized measurements
- So the Space Energy is concentrated by Length contraction effect but this concentrated Energy can't produce Matter unless the energy reach to the required quantum –
Based on this concept the solar planets are created depending on Energy of Pluto Motion Distance for 1 day –
This paper tries to prove this idea
,Does planet day period depend on its circumference,
Paper Question
Can The Planet Day Period Be A Function In Its Circumference?
- This Question Is Asked Because Of Saturn
- Saturn moves during its day period 10.7 hours, by its velocity (9.7 km/sec), a distance = Its Circumference (error only 1.3%)
- So, that pushed us to ask if any other planet behaves as such
- Jupiter moves during its day period 9.9 hours, by its velocity (13.1 km/sec), a distance = Its Circumference (error 4%) - Although the error isn't so small but the idea isn't disproved
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x Neptune Circumferences
- That creates the question…
- What's the relationship between the planet motion distance during its day period and its circumference, or in other words, if the planet day period can be defined as a function of its circumference….
- The paper provides the data analysis and discussion concerning the question
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis
The document discusses the motion of planets in the solar system. It proposes that motion is transported among the planets, meaning the planets' motions are interconnected rather than independent. As evidence, it points out that Pluto's long day period and the moon's orbital radius can both be explained by this interconnected motion. The paper aims to analyze planetary motions and rates of time to further support this theory of transported motion in the solar system.
Does mars fit his position is the solar group why not
The Claim
Mars Data Doesn't Fit his Position In The Solar Group
Because
Mars had immigrated from his original point with distance 84 million km from the sun and dwell in his new point with distance 227.9 million km from the sun (My Conclusion)
So Mars Data was fit to his original position (with distance 84 mkm)
But
Mars Data doesn't fit his new position (with distance 227.9 mkm)
This paper analyzes Mars Data to prove this Fact.
Earth Motion Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Earth Be Found Before The Sun Creation
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, The Earth is Older Than The Sun
- The ages question provides an essential modification for the physics basic theories,
- Because,
- If Earth be found and moving before the sun creation, that disproves clearly and decisively Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- As a result, Earth and all other solar planets must move by a force different from the sun mass gravity.
- But, how to prove that, the Earth is older than the sun? The event be found before millions of years!
- Because the sun circles Earth and gives it one face only, that may prove the sun data be created depending on Earth orbital period (365.25 days) which proves that the sun must be created after the Earth creation.
Paper Objective
- The paper analyzes Earth orbital period to know Why The Sun Circles Earth.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Matter Creation Principle (Part V)
Paper Main Idea:
- Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second only
- This light motion energy causes a planet to move for 1 solar day
- (Specifically) Light Motion for 1 second causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
- Pluto motion for 1 solar day causes Solar Planets Creation Process
- Pluto moves -during a solar day- a distance = 406000 km
- That's why Pluto Motion Daily =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
Based on this description …
(light motion for 1 second =1.16mkm) / (Pluto motion for 1 solar day =0.406mkm) = A
Conclusion
The Rate (A=2.8571) Controls Solar Group Basic Data
Matter creation principle (part iii)
Paper Hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels from Pluto to Earth Axis which creates the connection between Pluto on one side and Earth with her Moon on the other Side
Based on this connection Pluto and the Moon orbit effect on Solar Planets Creation Process
This hypothesis depends on
Solar System General Principle
-Solar group geometrical structure depends on energy of light beam motion (its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec) for one second period
-Light motion (1.16 mkm/sec) for 1 second period causes Planet to move for 1 solar day..
Mass Is Distributed Through Solar System
Mass Is Distributed Through Solar System
Paper Hypothesis
1- Planet Mass Is Not A Planet Property But Distributed Based On Solar System Geometrical Rules
2- Mass Distribution Proves That Solar Group Is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building- And The Energy Is Transported Through The Solar Group To Create The Planet Matter And Orbital Distance.
3- Saturn Is Solar System Central Point (i.e. Saturn Is Solar System Motor)
4- Mass Distribution aims To create Different Rates Of Time Between The Solar Planets Motions.
Why Earth moves Daily A Distance = The Moon Orbit Circumference
The Moon Orbit Data shows A Geometrical Structure more complex than the Current theories can explain … Let's refer to it in following:
- Perigee Radius (R1) = Earth Moon Distance = 363000 km (Earth Nearest Point)
- Eclipse Radius (R2) = Earth Moon Distance = 377000km (Total Solar Eclipse Point)
- Average Radius (R3) = Earth Moon Distance = 384000 km (Registered Value)
- Apogee Radius (R4) =Earth Moon Distance = 406000km (The Most Far Point)
Earth Daily Motion 2.58 mkm = The Moon Orbit Circumference at apogee (R4)..why?
The Data
I. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee Point = The Outer Planets Diameters Total
II. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee Point = The Solar Planets Diameters Total
III. The Distance Between Perigee & Apogee Points = the inner planets Diameters total = Earth Circumference
IV. Earth Moon Distance (At Total Solar Eclipse Radius) = Saturn Circumference.
V. The Solar Planets Diameters Total = Saturn Diameter +2 Jupiter Diameters
The Moon Orbit Main Points: (Perigee - Solar Eclipse – Average- Apogee)
These points are defined based on the following geometrical rules:
1- (1st Rule) "R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1" (Pythagoras Rule)
2- (2nd Rule) "2πRn= (1/Rn+1)" (Reflective Values)
3- (3rd Rule) "(2πRn+1/ 2πRn) =1.0725" (Relativities Effects)
(We should prove these rules in this paper)
The Conclusions
1- The Gravity Force Can't Create The Moon Orbit
2- The Space is A Geometrical Player In The Solar Group Geometry
3- There are relativistic effects in the solar Group
4- The Relativistic effects cause geometrical rules control the general geometrical structure (i.e. the higher velocity creates specific form for the space in which it travels)
Metonic cycle proves,, solar planets motions depend on their cooperation,, (1)
I provide a new vision for the solar group
The solar planets existence and motions depend on their cooperation with each other
This vision in fact contradicts the solar group current vision…
For example, the current vision refuses to have any relationship between Earth and Pluto because of the great distance between them, where the gravity force depends on the masses and decreases with the squared distance…
My vision, on contrary, uses the Energy as source for Matter and Distance, means, the matter is created from Energy as the Equation E=mc2 tells us, and the distance is created from Energy which is my hypothesis…
That means, the solar group is created from one energy
Let's imagine that the solar group is similar to a creature body, now the same blood in this body goes to all members and connect all these members by this same blood
So, Earth is connected with Pluto by the same energy which creates the matter and distance
The main advantage in my vision or about the solar group is The Cooperation Between The Solar Planets…
Metonic Cycle which is a cycle of Earth Moon extends for 19 sidereal years = 6939.75 days provides us a good proof for my claim
So, we shall see in this paper, how Metonic Cycle can be seen as energy transports from point to another point through the solar which proves and supports my point of view.
In fact that adds more extension for our thinking about the solar group and provides a great background for Metonic Cycle which is done by the Moon without explanation, where Earth doesn't rotate this cycle which answers our old question, if the planet moves by gravity and the moon under the Earth gravity, how does the moon rotate the Metonic Cycle which the Earth (his parent) doesn't?
Actually my vision provides new knowledge for the solar group where we'll use the cooperation between the solar planets as a real factor to perform their existence and motions
Note Please/
Metonic Cycle period = 6939.75 days
= 19 x 365.25 days (19 sidereal years)
= 235 x 29.53 days (235 Synodic Months)
= 20 x 346.6 days (20 nodal years)
The previous data tell that, there's a harmony between Earth, Moon and Moon orbit motions? why? We try to answer this question in this paper…
Earth Velocity Daily Analysis
Paper question
-Earth (29.8 km/s) moves during (24 hours) a distance = 2574720 km
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 378675 seconds a distance = 2574990 km
- Mars (24.1km/s) moves during 29.53 hours a distance = 2562023 km
- Why These Distances Are Equal Approximately? (The difference 1%)
Paper Claim
- The paper claims, these distances are equal to enable Pluto to move during its day period a distance = the moon displacements total during its day period, because the equality of these distances has a geometrical necessity for the solar system motion.
- The claim depends on a new description for the solar system which is:
o The solar group is one building and each planet is a part of it
o The solar planets move one unified motion as train carriages
o The solar group is one machine can be considered as (A Great Clock)
o The solar planets data is created depending on one another.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current description
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Similar to Pluto data shows a relationship with earth (20)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theory
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theory
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (III)
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (III)
,Does planet day period depend on its circumference,
,Does planet day period depend on its circumference,
Does mars fit his position is the solar group why not
Does mars fit his position is the solar group why not
Earth Motion Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Earth Motion Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
Why Earth moves Daily A Distance = The Moon Orbit Circumference
Why Earth moves Daily A Distance = The Moon Orbit Circumference
Metonic cycle proves,, solar planets motions depend on their cooperation,, (1)
Metonic cycle proves,, solar planets motions depend on their cooperation,, (1)
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current description
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current description
More from Gerges francis
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory.pdf
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion.pdf
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Life Depends On A Cycle.pdf
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon.pdf
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
The Sun Creation Process.pdf
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Planet Diameter Equation Analysis.pdf
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdf
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
The document discusses Kepler's law that a planet's orbit defines its velocity. It provides 5 points to explain this: 1) Planet data is based on exact equations, not random factors. 2) A planet's diameter should be indirectly related to its orbital distance to avoid breaking during motion. 3) A planet's mass affects its orbital inclination and limits variables in diameter equations. 4) A function is needed between a planet's orbit and velocity to connect variables like rotation period. 5) Newton's gravity theory and the Big Bang theory are incorrect because planet data requires exact geometrical rules, not chaos. The document aims to show planetary motions result from one precise geometrical design, not random forces.
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdf
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets.pdf
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation.pdf
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion.pdf
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
A Research Presentation Summary.pdf
A Research Presentation Summary
Abstract
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (No Planet moves by the sun gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation and using to prove (Mars Migration Theory) and (The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
More from Gerges francis (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
Recently uploaded
THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST(TAT) cognitive abilities, creativity, and critic...
THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST(TAT) cognitive abilities, creativity, and critic...Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan,kP,Pakistan
hematic appreciation test is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual's appreciation and understanding of specific themes or topics. This test helps to evaluate an individual's ability to connect different ideas and concepts within a given theme, as well as their overall comprehension and interpretation skills. The results of the test can provide valuable insights into an individual's cognitive abilities, creativity, and critical thinking skillsImmersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths Forward
We will metaverse into the essence of immersive learning, into its three dimensions and conceptual models. This approach encompasses elements from teaching methodologies to social involvement, through organizational concerns and technologies. Challenging the perception of learning as knowledge transfer, we introduce a 'Uses, Practices & Strategies' model operationalized by the 'Immersive Learning Brain' and ‘Immersion Cube’ frameworks. This approach offers a comprehensive guide through the intricacies of immersive educational experiences and spotlighting research frontiers, along the immersion dimensions of system, narrative, and agency. Our discourse extends to stakeholders beyond the academic sphere, addressing the interests of technologists, instructional designers, and policymakers. We span various contexts, from formal education to organizational transformation to the new horizon of an AI-pervasive society. This keynote aims to unite the iLRN community in a collaborative journey towards a future where immersive learning research and practice coalesce, paving the way for innovative educational research and practice landscapes.
3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)
3D Particle-In-Cell (PIC) algorithm,
Plasma expansion in the dipole magnetic field.
Applied Science: Thermodynamics, Laws & Methodology.pdf
When I was asked to give a companion lecture in support of ‘The Philosophy of Science’ (https://shorturl.at/4pUXz) I decided not to walk through the detail of the many methodologies in order of use. Instead, I chose to employ a long standing, and ongoing, scientific development as an exemplar. And so, I chose the ever evolving story of Thermodynamics as a scientific investigation at its best.
Conducted over a period of >200 years, Thermodynamics R&D, and application, benefitted from the highest levels of professionalism, collaboration, and technical thoroughness. New layers of application, methodology, and practice were made possible by the progressive advance of technology. In turn, this has seen measurement and modelling accuracy continually improved at a micro and macro level.
Perhaps most importantly, Thermodynamics rapidly became a primary tool in the advance of applied science/engineering/technology, spanning micro-tech, to aerospace and cosmology. I can think of no better a story to illustrate the breadth of scientific methodologies and applications at their best.
Shallowest Oil Discovery of Turkiye.pptx
The Petroleum System of the Çukurova Field - the Shallowest Oil Discovery of Türkiye, Adana
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
Cytokines and their role in immune regulation.pptx
This presentation covers the content and information on "Cytokines " and their role in immune regulation .
waterlessdyeingtechnolgyusing carbon dioxide chemicalspdf
The technology uses reclaimed CO₂ as the dyeing medium in a closed loop process. When pressurized, CO₂ becomes supercritical (SC-CO₂). In this state CO₂ has a very high solvent power, allowing the dye to dissolve easily.
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...
Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a time-consuming and systematic task, typically done using teams. Team members must ground their activities on common understandings of the major concepts underlying the thematic analysis, and define criteria for its development. However, conceptual misunderstandings, equivocations, and lack of adherence to criteria are challenges to the quality and speed of this process. Given the distributed and uncertain nature of this process, we wondered if the tasks in thematic analysis could be supported by readily available artificial intelligence chatbots. Our early efforts point to potential benefits: not just saving time in the coding process but better adherence to criteria and grounding, by increasing triangulation between humans and artificial intelligence. This tutorial will provide a description and demonstration of the process we followed, as two academic researchers, to develop a custom ChatGPT to assist with qualitative coding in the thematic data analysis process of immersive learning accounts in a survey of the academic literature: QUAL-E Immersive Learning Thematic Analysis Helper. In the hands-on time, participants will try out QUAL-E and develop their ideas for their own qualitative coding ChatGPT. Participants that have the paid ChatGPT Plus subscription can create a draft of their assistants. The organizers will provide course materials and slide deck that participants will be able to utilize to continue development of their custom GPT. The paid subscription to ChatGPT Plus is not required to participate in this workshop, just for trying out personal GPTs during it.
Randomised Optimisation Algorithms in DAPHNE
Slides from talk:
Aleš Zamuda: Randomised Optimisation Algorithms in DAPHNE .
Austrian-Slovenian HPC Meeting 2024 – ASHPC24, Seeblickhotel Grundlsee in Austria, 10–13 June 2024
https://ashpc.eu/
Sharlene Leurig - Enabling Onsite Water Use with Net Zero Water
Sharlene Leurig - Enabling Onsite Water Use with Net Zero WaterTexas Alliance of Groundwater Districts
Presented at June 6-7 Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Business MeetingCompexometric titration/Chelatorphy titration/chelating titration
Classification
Metal ion ion indicators
Masking and demasking reagents
Estimation of Magnisium sulphate
Calcium gluconate
Complexometric Titration/ chelatometry titration/chelating titration, introduction, Types-
1.Direct Titration
2.Back Titration
3.Replacement Titration
4.Indirect Titration
Masking agent, Demasking agents
formation of complex
comparition between masking and demasking agents,
Indicators/Metal ion indicators/ Metallochromic indicators/pM indicators,
Visual Technique,PM indicators (metallochromic), Indicators of pH, Redox Indicators
Instrumental Techniques-Photometry
Potentiometry
Miscellaneous methods.
Complex titration with EDTA.
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically young
The Milky Way’s (MW) inner stellar halo contains an [Fe/H]-rich component with highly eccentric orbits, often referred to as the
‘last major merger.’ Hypotheses for the origin of this component include Gaia-Sausage/Enceladus (GSE), where the progenitor
collided with the MW proto-disc 8–11 Gyr ago, and the Virgo Radial Merger (VRM), where the progenitor collided with the
MW disc within the last 3 Gyr. These two scenarios make different predictions about observable structure in local phase space,
because the morphology of debris depends on how long it has had to phase mix. The recently identified phase-space folds in Gaia
DR3 have positive caustic velocities, making them fundamentally different than the phase-mixed chevrons found in simulations
at late times. Roughly 20 per cent of the stars in the prograde local stellar halo are associated with the observed caustics. Based
on a simple phase-mixing model, the observed number of caustics are consistent with a merger that occurred 1–2 Gyr ago.
We also compare the observed phase-space distribution to FIRE-2 Latte simulations of GSE-like mergers, using a quantitative
measurement of phase mixing (2D causticality). The observed local phase-space distribution best matches the simulated data
1–2 Gyr after collision, and certainly not later than 3 Gyr. This is further evidence that the progenitor of the ‘last major merger’
did not collide with the MW proto-disc at early times, as is thought for the GSE, but instead collided with the MW disc within
the last few Gyr, consistent with the body of work surrounding the VRM.
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...
The pygmy halfbeak Dermogenys colletei, is known for its viviparous nature, this presents an intriguing case of relatively low fecundity, raising questions about potential compensatory reproductive strategies employed by this species. Our study delves into the examination of fecundity and the Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) in the Pygmy Halfbeak, D. colletei (Meisner, 2001), an intriguing viviparous fish indigenous to Sarawak, Borneo. We hypothesize that the Pygmy halfbeak, D. colletei, may exhibit unique reproductive adaptations to offset its low fecundity, thus enhancing its survival and fitness. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive study utilizing 28 mature female specimens of D. colletei, carefully measuring fecundity and GSI to shed light on the reproductive adaptations of this species. Our findings reveal that D. colletei indeed exhibits low fecundity, with a mean of 16.76 ± 2.01, and a mean GSI of 12.83 ± 1.27, providing crucial insights into the reproductive mechanisms at play in this species. These results underscore the existence of unique reproductive strategies in D. colletei, enabling its adaptation and persistence in Borneo's diverse aquatic ecosystems, and call for further ecological research to elucidate these mechanisms. This study lends to a better understanding of viviparous fish in Borneo and contributes to the broader field of aquatic ecology, enhancing our knowledge of species adaptations to unique ecological challenges.
8.Isolation of pure cultures and preservation of cultures.pdf
Isolation of pure culture, its various method.
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...
Current descriptions of immersive learning cases are often difficult or impossible to compare. This is due to a myriad of different options on what details to include, which aspects are relevant, and on the descriptive approaches employed. Also, these aspects often combine very specific details with more general guidelines or indicate intents and rationales without clarifying their implementation. In this paper we provide a method to describe immersive learning cases that is structured to enable comparisons, yet flexible enough to allow researchers and practitioners to decide which aspects to include. This method leverages a taxonomy that classifies educational aspects at three levels (uses, practices, and strategies) and then utilizes two frameworks, the Immersive Learning Brain and the Immersion Cube, to enable a structured description and interpretation of immersive learning cases. The method is then demonstrated on a published immersive learning case on training for wind turbine maintenance using virtual reality. Applying the method results in a structured artifact, the Immersive Learning Case Sheet, that tags the case with its proximal uses, practices, and strategies, and refines the free text case description to ensure that matching details are included. This contribution is thus a case description method in support of future comparative research of immersive learning cases. We then discuss how the resulting description and interpretation can be leveraged to change immersion learning cases, by enriching them (considering low-effort changes or additions) or innovating (exploring more challenging avenues of transformation). The method holds significant promise to support better-grounded research in immersive learning.
如何办理(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证本科学位证书原版一模一样
原版纸张【微信：741003700 】【(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptx
Although Artemia has been known to man for centuries, its use as a food for the culture of larval organisms apparently began only in the 1930s, when several investigators found that it made an excellent food for newly hatched fish larvae (Litvinenko et al., 2023). As aquaculture developed in the 1960s and ‘70s, the use of Artemia also became more widespread, due both to its convenience and to its nutritional value for larval organisms (Arenas-Pardo et al., 2024). The fact that Artemia dormant cysts can be stored for long periods in cans, and then used as an off-the-shelf food requiring only 24 h of incubation makes them the most convenient, least labor-intensive, live food available for aquaculture (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021). The nutritional value of Artemia, especially for marine organisms, is not constant, but varies both geographically and temporally. During the last decade, however, both the causes of Artemia nutritional variability and methods to improve poorquality Artemia have been identified (Loufi et al., 2024).
Brine shrimp (Artemia spp.) are used in marine aquaculture worldwide. Annually, more than 2,000 metric tons of dry cysts are used for cultivation of fish, crustacean, and shellfish larva. Brine shrimp are important to aquaculture because newly hatched brine shrimp nauplii (larvae) provide a food source for many fish fry (Mozanzadeh et al., 2021). Culture and harvesting of brine shrimp eggs represents another aspect of the aquaculture industry. Nauplii and metanauplii of Artemia, commonly known as brine shrimp, play a crucial role in aquaculture due to their nutritional value and suitability as live feed for many aquatic species, particularly in larval stages (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021).
Recently uploaded (20)
THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST(TAT) cognitive abilities, creativity, and critic...
THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST(TAT) cognitive abilities, creativity, and critic...
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths Forward
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths Forward
3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)
3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)
Applied Science: Thermodynamics, Laws & Methodology.pdf
Applied Science: Thermodynamics, Laws & Methodology.pdf
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
Cytokines and their role in immune regulation.pptx
Cytokines and their role in immune regulation.pptx
waterlessdyeingtechnolgyusing carbon dioxide chemicalspdf
waterlessdyeingtechnolgyusing carbon dioxide chemicalspdf
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...
Sharlene Leurig - Enabling Onsite Water Use with Net Zero Water
Sharlene Leurig - Enabling Onsite Water Use with Net Zero Water
Compexometric titration/Chelatorphy titration/chelating titration
Compexometric titration/Chelatorphy titration/chelating titration
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically young
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically young
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...
8.Isolation of pure cultures and preservation of cultures.pdf
8.Isolation of pure cultures and preservation of cultures.pdf
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptx
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptx
Basics of crystallography, crystal systems, classes and different forms
Basics of crystallography, crystal systems, classes and different forms
Pluto data shows a relationship with earth
- 1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 1 Pluto Data shows a relationship with Earth By Gerges Francis Twadrous 2nd course student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty – Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013 TEL +201022532292 georgytawdrous@yandex.ru / mrwaheid@gmail.com The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –2nd December 2018 Abstract Earth Pluto Relationship disproves the solar group current theory And proves that the solar group is one geometrical structure 1- Introduction In this paper we discuss a discovered relationship between Earth and Pluto which disproves simply the gravity concept and supports my claim that - The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory Or - The solar group is on geometrical structure and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure …. As I have explain in my previous paper The Solar Group Is One Geometrical Structure In this introduction we should discuss the geometrical meaning behind some data for example…Mars Axial tilt = 25.2 degrees… We know that the value (25.2) is the constant in Kepler 3rd law using solar planets data where the distance is million km units and the periods are in days units So …..D3 = 25.2 x P2 (kepler 3rd law) But ….25.2 = 8π Why 25.2 = 8π? Where we know that π is a cyclic number… why the constant in kepler 3rd law = 8π ? Also Neptune axial tilt = 28.3 degrees but (180 /2π) = 28.6 degrees where 28.6 x 0.99 = 28.3 degrees The question simply why many values in the solar group is cyclic numbers? In all my papers I provide one idea… The current theory tells us each planet is separated and independent from other planets, based on that the planet data is his own data I try to prove that, the solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point ion this same trajectory which makes each planet data is suitable and complementary to other planets data, and this the reason caused the previous data creation. Marx axial tilt (25.2) is the constant in kepler 3rd law equation basically because (25.2= 8π) which means Mars axial tilt is a cyclic number because this same value
- 2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 2 works for many planets and should be in harmony with all of them, that's why Mars axial tilt should be a cyclic number… Also Neptune axial tilt 28.3 degrees does a similar role because Neptune reflected the main energy toward the inner planets… that's why this planet should have a cyclic numbers to enable him to get harmony with many other planets Please review Solar Group Geometrical Structure http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081 I want to say that, Because the solar planets are connected together (as one trajectory of Energy) that makes the cyclic numbers are necessary numbers to provide the harmony between these connected planets… Pluto Data shows a strong relationship with Earth and supports this claim strongly. In fact the main connection between Pluto and Earth is the distance 0.406 million km 0.406 million km = = Earth Moon distance at apogee radius (I) = Pluto Velocity Daily (II) = 2088 mkm x (71)2 (III) Equations I and II are clear let's discuss the third one Equation (III) 2088 million km = Jupiter Uranus Distance, we have discussed this distance frequently… the light travel this distance is 6939.75 seconds but we know Metonic Cycle =6939.75 days If fact I claimed that the second value in light motion will be a day value in the moon motion This process is done by Pluto contribution but this geometrical role isn't clear yet before me…. But in this paper I provide data proves the Earth Pluto Relationship and in next one we should discuss how the valu4e 1 second van be 1 day… The important value is (71)2 = 5041 but we know that Mercury needs 5040 seconds to make his day 176 days So Jupiter Uranus distance if contracted by lorentz length contraction effect with rate 71 (which is produced by a velocity v=0.9999c) for 2 times. Means (71)2 will produce this same distance 0.406 million km Now Metonic Cycle and the moon orbit are found based on this same value 0.406 mkm and I claim that Pluto contributed by his relationship with the Earth to do this job. That means the moon orbit and Metonic Cycle are found by help of Pluto.. Any way the previous data can be explained only by my theory that the solar group is one geometrical structure. where the value (71)2 (relativistic effect) is used frequently in the solar group geometrical structure but seen by us as 5040 seconds.
- 3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 3 3- Earth Pluto Relationship 3-1 The orbital Period and Distance I- Data 1- Pluto orbital period 90588 days = 8π3 x 365.25 days (Earth orbital period) 2- Pluto orbital Circumference 37000 mkm = 8π3 x 149.6 mkm Earth orbital (distance) 3- Earth Velocity daily 2.58 mkm = Pluto Velocity Daily 0.406 mkm x 2π II- Discussion The data is clear enough - Pluto Orbital Period depends on Earth orbital period - Pluto Orbital Distance depends on Earth orbital Distance - Earth Daily Velocity depends on Pluto Daily Velocity 3-2-Orbital inclination and axial tilt I- Data - 17.4 deg.(inner planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 17.2 deg. Pluto orbital inclination - 23.6 deg.(outer planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 23.4 deg. Earth axial tilt - 122.5 deg. Pluto axial tilt = 17.2 deg. Pluto orbital inclination x 7.1 (lorentz length contraction rate for a velocity v=0.99c) II- Discussion I wish the data is clear before our eyes There's a geometrical reason based on which both value of Pluto orbital inclination and Earth axial tilt ar4e produced…. This is the only why to explain the previous data If there's a geometrical reason effect on both planet (Pluto and Earth) that means there's a geometrical relationship between these 23 planets which disproves the gravity concept. 3-3 General Relationships I- Data - 232.7 deg. (inner planets axial tilts total) = 1461 days (earth 4 years cycle)/2π - 232.7 deg. = 122.5 deg. Pluto axial tilt x 1.9 deg. Mars orbital inclination - 232.7 deg.= 37000 mkm (Pluto orbital circumference) / 16 π2 - 37000mkm (Pluto orbital circumference)= 1461 days x 25.2 deg. We should remember our rule 1 million km = 1 day = 1 degree…
- 4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 4 Important Equation - 179.7 deg. x 7 = 1259.3 deg. but 1259 deg x 0.406 = 511.1 (solar planets axial tilts total) II- Discussion I can't explain the geometrical rules which produced this data but I can confirm that this data is produced based on a geometrical reason which proves there's a geometrical relationship between Earth and Pluto disproving the gravity concept. Author Other Papers 1st Degree in Physics Needs 24 Years!! (My Story) http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0339 The Moon Motion Trajectory http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0313 "Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"(Part2) http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0188 "Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry" http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0178 Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square (Proves2) http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0163 Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square (Proves) http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0147 Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0135 Solar Planets Motions Trajectory is A Pyramid or A Cone? (Part II) http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0096 Gerges Francis Tawdrous TEL +201022532292 E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous All papers https://www.slideshare.net/search/slideshow?searchfrom=header&q=gerges+francis+papers