2. CONTENT
1. Purpose.
2. Reason.
3. Comparison.
List of model to compare.
Compare model together.
Show Weighted Scoring Model
4. Result.
Show the strengths and weakness of model.
Recommendation.
3. PURPOSE
Choose the model tablet for four hundred (400) staff over the
period of a month.
Functionality of tablet:
Built-in email
Camera
Media player
Organizer
Browser
GPS
4. REASON
The model which using is too expensive.
The staff uses too much type of model , it is not same.
Difficult to manage.
Not provide the functionality
5. COMPARISON
LIST OF MODEL
Apple Ipad
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1
Microsoft Surface RT
Google Nexus 7
6. COMPARISON (CONT)
The Score of comparison for model
Apple Samsung Microsoft Google
Performance 86 62 83 84
Feature 67 58 60 62
Design 84 62 68 66
Warranty & Support 84 72 60 75
Total Cost Owner 80 65 55 70
* Using the mark from 0 to 100.
8. RESULT
Apple Ipad
Strength:
Performance is good , good security.
The feature is enough for staff to use.
Best design for 4 model which compares
Weakness:
Not support flash player for browsing and not support
the card reader.
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1
Strength:
Support flash player and card reader.
The size of screen is big so that easy to use.
Weakness:
Performance is normal and not good of design.
Screen of resolution is low.
9. RESULT(CONT)
Microsoft Surface RT
Strength:
Good design , easy to use the touch screen or touch
cover.
Performance is good , feature is enough to use.
Weakness:
The price is too expensive , the screen resolution is low
and heavy.
Can not install application which out in store.
Google Nexus 7
Strength:
Performance is good , support flash player and many
technology.
The price is good , the user of forum is crowded.
Weakness:
The size of screen is too small.
Design is normal and just one color.
10. RESULT(CONT)
Recommendation.
The Apple Ipad is best for staff to use.
Performance is good.
Feature is enough for staff to use.
Price is acceptable , the size and the resolution of
screen is good.
Design, warranty and support is good.