Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
NCCC eLearning Quality Review Project
1. Donna Simiele| eLearning Technology Support Coordinator
dsimiele@niagaracc.suny.edu
SUNY –Niagara County Community College, Sanborn, NY
www.niagaracc.suny.edu
2. eLearning Technology Support
Coordinator/Instructional Designer for 3 years
Teaching undergraduate on campus and online
courses for 14 years
Quality Matters / OSCQR Reviewer
Open SUNY Center for Online Teaching
Excellence (COTE) Expert Instructional
Designer Fellow
ncccelearning.com
3. About SUNY & NCCC
• 64 Campuses
• 459,550 students
• University Centers
• University
Colleges
• Technology
Colleges
• Community
Colleges
4.
5. NCCC has been
online for 16 years:
8 online programs,
2 online
certifications,
180 online &
blended
courses/semester.
6. Open SUNY is a SUNY-wide
collaboration that opens the door to
world-class online-enabled learning
opportunities. Open SUNY is not a
new degree program or a new
school; it’s a seamless way for you
to access the courses, degrees,
professors, and rich academics of
all 64 SUNY campuses flexibly—
wherever and whenever you want.
For the first time, SUNY is
delivering its renowned high-quality
education with an unprecedented
breadth of tools, services, and
supports designed to help you be
successful. With Open SUNY, you
can look forward to:
Flexibility
Support
Experience
Simplicity
Excellence Access
7. Open SUNY - Center for Online
Teaching Excellence
SUNY has launched a new center
that celebrates, connects, and grows
effective online education practitioners
across the SUNY system while also furthering
our knowledge of the most effective teaching
and learning practices in online education.
Questions about COTE can be sent to
contactcote@suny.edu
8.
9. Time of registration
Poor advising
Age
Engagement and Course
Design
Development Needs
Gender
Technical Factors/Business
Processes
First-time e-Learning student
Previous College Success-
GPA
Learning Styles
SUNY Directors of Distance Learning Environments
10. 1. New Quality Review Project Using
OSCQR
2. eLearning Student Support Specialist
3. Creation of eLearning student success
orientation (Blackboard Course)
4. LMS and technology workshops for
students
5. IITG Grant – Building Accessible Content
in online courses using Universal Design
methods
13. About the NCCC Quality Review Project
The NCCC Quality Review process is a faculty-driven, collegial
course design review process. The rubric does not evaluate the
faculty member or the faculty member’s content expertise.
The review makes use of the Open SUNY COTE Quality Review
Rubric known as “OSCQR.”
This project will help NCCC maintain and enhance the quality of its
online courses through a process of continuous improvement.
This review process is not a part of NCCC’s faculty evaluation
process. It evaluates the online course itself. The reviewers evaluate
the course before it goes live so that the focus is on the course
design, not the faculty member or how the course is run.
The review process is completely voluntary.
14. OSCQR
NCCC (Modified) Version of OSCQR
Video about OSCQR
Meet the OSCQR Rubric (Alexandra
Pickett)
15. Accessibility Issues
Open SUNY OSCQR included an Accessibility
Component
NCCC Required Materials
Course Interaction
16. Received a SUNY Innovative Instruction
Technology Grant (IITG)
With Grant Funding:
▪ Built a compliance checklist (based on Middle
States, Higher Education Opportunity Act, and
OSCQR Accessibility standards)
▪ Checked online courses for compliance issues
▪ Sent findings to faculty
▪ Provided professional development sessions based
on findings
21. Documents
Font type, font size, colors
Blackboard did not have a print function
Documents were only offered in Word not PDF
PDF
Some PDF files were hand written and scanned
Tables
Blackboard does not have the ability to make
tables accessible – All docs with tables needed to
be created in Word
Hyperlinks
Showed URL not text, Alt Text was not provided
22. PowerPoint
If narrated, they did not contain
captions/transcripts
Layouts were often not used
Images
Did not contain Alt Text
Videos
Were not CC or transcribed
23. Provided Individual Results to Each
Faculty
One-on-One Sessions
30 Minute Mentor Monday’s (Recorded)
Open Compliance Sessions
Accessibility Resources
Progress Survey Sent (End of the Fall
semester)
25. Accessibility Training –
Atomic Learning Videos
(Total Watching Time 20
min.)
Self Evaluation (20 question
Quiz)
Accessibility Resources
Student Testimonials
Tools and Techniques for
Improving Course
Accessibility (Magna
Commons)
26. Donna Simiele
eLearning Technology
Support Coordinator
dsimiele@niagaracc.suny.edu
Project Materials:
Resources:
NCCC eLearning Faculty Support Center (Blog)
NCCC (Modified) OSCQR
Compliance Checklist, Form, and Checklist with
Resources/Descriptions
SUNY Resources:
Open SUNY
Center for Online Teaching Excellence (COTE)
Open SUNY COTE Quality Review Rubric (OSCQR)
Questions about OSCQR
Editor's Notes
427,000 students in 2013 – 239,791 Enrollments in Community Colleges
Our campus is located about 10 miles from Niagara Falls New York
SLN has morphed into Open SUNY. How has Open SUNY changed?
This vibrant community combines the knowledge and experience of researchers, instructional designers, librarians, technologists, and online educators. Non-SUNY faculty can join as interested participants.
Offer Community Discussion boards
COTE Chats
Why did we need Quality Reviews Performed at NCCC?
- Trying to increase student success and retention.
Look at risk factors and focused on the two factors that we had control over.
- Course Design & Learning Styles
These are some of the initiatives that we worked on since my predecessor Lisa Dubuc presented two years ago.
-We moved from using Quality Matters for course reviews to OSCQR in 2014.
Open SUNY was formally known as SUNY Learning Network or SLN. OSCQR was developed to replace the QM rubric for reviewing online courses.
To enable campuses to ensure that their online courses are learner centric and well designed, a team of Open SUNY Center for Online Teaching Excellence staff and campus stakeholders has designed the OSCQR Rubric, a customizable and flexible tool for measurement. The 37 incorporated standards focus on course design from the perspective of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) model, and help reviewers assess opportunities for social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence in addition to the overall online course educational experience. The OSCQR Rubric is intended to be used for assessing course design rather than the actual course delivery.
The rubric started with the Chico Rubric, twenty years of SUNY Learning Network research informed best online practices, the SUNY Office of General Counsel’s, memorandum on accessibility considerations, and conducted a gap analysis with the Quality Matters, iNACOL (North American Council for Online Learning- international), and Blackboard Exemplary Courses. The resulting 37 point checklist also incorporates the Community of Inquiry Model, the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, the Adult Learner, Bloom’s Taxonomy, How People Learn, and has been mapped to the Open SUNY COTE fundamental and core competencies for online course design.
We used QM from 2011 to 2014. Once SUNY built the OSCQR rubric we trained several of our reviewers to use the new rubric.
While using the new OSCQR rubric to do Quality Reviews at NCCC we found a need to delve deeper into the accessibility issues and other required materials for online courses.
We felt that funding was needed in order to do a check of this magnitude. We modified the OSCQR Accessibility rubric by building a checklist that can be used by all faculty to check their courses. This checklist not only included specific aspects to look for based on accessibility but also the materials required by NCCC and Middle States. (e.g. course interaction)
The SUNY IITG grant was used to check online courses at NCCC to see where we could build professional development sessions that would provide the necessary skills to make the needed updates for compliance issues along with necessary standards set by Middle States and the Higher Education Opportunity Act. Part of our compliance checklist looked into student-to-student, faculty-to-student, and student-to-faculty interaction. These forms of interact are required by Middle States for all online courses.
Not only did we look at the accessibility requirements but also used the theory of Universal Design.
We checked at least one course taught by each faculty member. We found that the same issues were occurring in all of the courses so we thought our time was better spent selecting one course per faculty.
MyLabs was the highest 3rd Party content at 13 courses.
-Cengage (SAM)
-McGraw Hill (Connect)
-Websites
Etc.
Using the Survey from faculty we decided it was best to work with faculty in a more one-on-one setting. We continued to have open sessions this semester but several faculty scheduled appointments or called to discuss their individual results.
This training is currently available in the Bb eLearning Faculty User Group.