Contents Page Questionnaire Summary

1. Contents page questionnaire summary
In total 8 people answered my questionnaire, there are several things that the respondents both
liked and disliked. Throughout the questionnaire it was agreed that my contents page looked
conventional. The font received mixed views however the majority were positive comments such as,
the font is legible and easy to read. On the other hand a reoccurring point was that the Editors note
font, was too large and bold.
The colour scheme was praised in the way that, the red and white complemented each other, but
the use of colour was, at points criticised, or, more specifically the lack of colour used. Some
respondents found the persistent use of white plain. When asked about the layout many of those
who replied said it was pleasant to look at and easy to follow. Criticisms included the blank space at
the bottom of the page, it was said that it should be filled with another article.
The question that asked if the articles were appropriate for a music magazine was met with no
criticism. Question about whether the images were suitable also had positive answers; the only
negative point made was that there should be a few more images
In order to improve my magazine there are several things I need to do. Firstly I should modify the
Editors note font to a sleeker, smaller style. Along with this, I will also substitute the use of white
colour to make the contents page more appealing. The blank space will also be filled with text,
perhaps a subscription offer. Finally I will also aim to use more images. All of this will be done, in
order to improve my magazine front cover.