Learning Communities in the School of Education, National Unviversity
1. Fall Academic Assembly 2014
Scholarship and Research
National University
Cynthia Sistek-Chandler, cchandler@nu.edu
KayDee Caywood, kcaywood@nu.edu
Wayne Padover, wpadover@nu.edu
Patricia Dickenson, pdickenson@nu.edu
School of Education
3. The Professional Learning Community (Dufour and Eaker)
Six Characteristics
1. Shared mission, vision, and values
2. Collective inquiry
3. Collaborative teams
4. Action orientation and experimentation
5. Continuous improvement
6. Results orientation
17. Jo Birdsell and Peter Serdyukov, Discussants
Along with other members of S & R Wayne Padover
Open to All Faculty, Adjunct, Administration, and Staff
18. The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do
in Life and Business
20. References
An, H., Kim, S., & Kim, B. (2008). Teacher Perspectives on Online Collaborative Learning: Factors Perceived
as Facilitating and Impeding Successful Online Group Work. Contemporary Issues in Technology and
Teacher Education, 8(1).
Berry, G. (2008). Asynchronous Discussions: Best Practices. 24th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching
& Learning. Madison: University of Wisconsin System.
Bettoni, M., Bernhard, W., Eggs, C. and Schiller, G. (2011) Participative faculty development with an
online course in eCollaboration. Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning. Okanagan,
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Bolkan, J (2013). Report: District use of social networks up 44 percent over 2 years. THE Journal,
newsletter available at: http://thejournal.com/articles/2013/04/17/report-district-use-of-social-networks-
up-44-percent-over-two-years.aspx?admgarea=News1 (last accessed 21 April 2013)
Cann, A., Calvert, J., Masse, K. & Moffat, K. (2006). Assessed Online Discussion Groups in Biology
Education. Bioscience Education eJournal, 8(11).
Caspi, A., Gorsky, P. & Chajut, E. (2003). The Influence of Group Size on Non-mandatory Asynchronous
Instructional Discussion Groups. The Internet and Higher Education (6) 227-240.
Conrad, R. & Donaldson, J. (2004). Engaging the Online Learner. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons.
21. Dron, J, Anderson, T. and Slemens, G. (2011). Putting things in context – Designing social media for
education. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning. Brighton, UK
Forkosh-Baruch, A. and Hershkovitz, A. (2012). A case study of Israeli higher-education institutes sharing
scholarly information with the community via social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, vol 15, no
1, pp 58-68.
Garrison, D. R. and W. Archer. A Community of Inquiry Framework for Online Learning. In: M.
Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education. New York: Erlbaum, 2003.
Garrison, D. (2007). Online Community of Inquiry Review: Social, Cognitive, and Teaching Presence Issues.
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61-72.
Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer
Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education 2(2-3): 87-105.
Gorsky, P., & Blau, I. (2009). Online Teaching Effectiveness: A Tale of Two Instructors. International Review of
Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3).
Kukulska-Hulme, A (2010). Learning cultures on the move: Where are we heading? Educational Technology &
Society, vol 13, no 4, pp 4–14.
Vesely, P., Bloom, L., & Sherlock, J. (2007). Key Elements of Building Online Community: Comparing Faculty
and Student Perceptions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 234-246.
Editor's Notes
We are all connected through our affiliations and interests. How is the School of Education making connections and building community through digital media?
Digital media we will present is: interactive webpages (KayDee), learning management system interactions (CC), Webinar and Meetings through Adobe Connect (Patricia & Wayne) Digital Newsletter (CC) in the form of the Faculty Community a socially oriented webpage, social course home in eCollege where names and images pop up to share latest posts and contributions, Blackboard’s new landing page, through websites and professional networks,
Characteristics of Professional Learning Communities and Communities of Practice
In the following section, three models of professional learning commutes (PLCs) and three models of communities
of practice (CoPs) are briefly introduced in order to provide the reader with a basic understanding that will lead into
the later discussion in this paper.
Dufour and Eaker (1998)
Dufour and Eaker (1998) are the impetus behind learning organizations being referred to as “professional
learning communities” in the field of education. In their book, the authors make the distinction that the term
“organization” connotes efficiency and structure, whereas “community” connotes individuals linked by common
interest. Dufour and Eaker define a professional learning community as “educators [creating] an environment that
fosters mutual cooperation, emotional support, and personal growth as they work together to achieve what they
cannot accomplish alone” (p. xii). The Dufour and Eaker model of professional learning communities is a framework from which a school faculty can
begin to shift the culture of their school in order to build capacity for implementing and sustaining change. The
developers of the model also emphasize the importance of the roles the principal, parents and community play in
establishing the learning community, as well as changes in the curricular focus of the school. Lesser attention is
given to how collaborative teams function and the importance of sharing team learning school-wide.
Murphy & Lick (2004)
STARS
Why we use the acronym?
sociable — unsociable
sensitive — insensitive
personal — impersonal
warm — cold
humanizing — dehumanizing
informal — formal
What happens in a Learning Community (or is supposed to happen?) This shows the research by
Garrison, D. (2007). Online Community of Inquiry Review: Social, Cognitive, and Teaching Presence Issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61-72.
Showing the interconnectedness to how the intellectual and educational experience is intertwined.
KayDee
Cynthia
Wayne
Patricia
Cynthia
Case Study KayDee Caywood and Jesse Keeler
2012
Follow-Up Study
Describe how SPED was able to increase collaborative efforts in SOE.
KayDee
What can we do in the Learning Community?
Contributions from all stakeholders.
KayDee and Cynthia
Results from the 2013 Survey of the Faculty and the Faculty Community
Two digital examples
What we feature each month:
Authored Books
Published Journal Articles
Conference Presentations
Calls for Proposals (Robyn Hill, New Editor)
Patricia and Cynthia
Journals, Book Chapters and other Pubs
Patricia and Cynthia
Journals, Book Chapters and other Pubs
Wayne-Books are selected as a catalyst for conversations. How does the text inform our discipline?