SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 27
SIMULATION PROJECT
B Y
Ukesh ChawaL
1000796687
DR. Brian HUFF
IE 4322
Spring 2013
PROBLEM DEFINITION
Technology Exporters U.S.A has been hired by New World Energy’s (NWE) board to assist in
the planning and design of the proposed 1.0 Megawatt/Month PV panel production facility which
is basically the goal of the study. The purpose of the study is to report Heinrich Grünfuror,
NWE’s Chief Technical Officer by generating a process plan, based on the information provided,
for the PV panel production process.
Some of the questions that may be encountered during our study are how to generate a process
plan, how to produce a graphical representation of this production process, how much of a
capital investment will NWE have to make to develop a pilot production facility in Akureyri
Iceland, what will be NWE’s total capital investment for the final production facility, what will
your staffing requirements be for the pilot production facility, what shift patterns and staffing
levels should be used to run the Akureyri facility during each phase of our production expansion.
Once the pilot production facility is up and running, the NWE board will allocate a maximum of
$600,000 per month in new capital investment provided that each additional investment of
capital can be proven to result in a significant increase in PV panel production numbers. Based
in this funding profile, provide an estimated capitalization plan for incrementally bringing the
Akureyri facility up to full capacity. This may be considered as the problem we may face during
the project because we have to spend under $600,000 per month. Also we have to manage the
shift of our staffs and manage the proper staffing levels in proper time. Moreover, there will be
some problems while preparing source silicon material such doing purification by removing
contaminants and oxides from raw silicon. These are problems which we must know in order to
solve them.
PROJECT PLANNING
Event Time Date Resource
Understand and Define the Problem 2 hours 3/25/13 Handout
Project Planning 3 hours 3/26/13 Excel
System Definition 3 hours 3/27/13 Word
Conceptual Model Formulation 6 days 3/2813 -
4/3/13
Flow Chart, Igrafx
Preliminary Experimental Design 3 hours 4/4/13 Word
Input Data Preparation 5 days 4/5/13 –
4/9/13
Excel, Word
Model Translation (Do simulation on the
Model)
7 days 4/10/13 –
4/16/13
witness 2.0
Verification & Validation (Analysis the Model
with Different changing Tasks)
2 days 4/17/13 –
4/18/13
witness 2.0,Word
Final Experimental Design (Use the resource
Given by Technology Exporters U.S.A)
2 days 4/19/13 –
4/20/13
witness 2.0
Experimentation 8 days 4/21/13 –
4/28/13
witness 2.0, Excel,
Graph
Analysis and Interpretation (Answer Mr.
Grunfuror’s questions)
4 hours 4/29/13 Word, witness 2.0
Implementation and Documentation (Write and
concluded the results with a report)
2 days 4/30/13 –
5/1/13
Excel, witness 2.0
SYSTEM DEFINITION
1. Preparing Source Silicon Material
The raw mined silicon must be cleaned and purified before it can be used for silicon
wafer production. The raw silicon will be provided to the factory by the truck load. The
raw silicon will be stored to hoppers which deliver the crushed silicon ore to the factory’s
ore purification facility. The objective of the ore purification process is to remove mineral
contaminants and oxides from the raw silicon. This is done by first cleaning the silicon
ore using a chemical cleaning process and then placing the cleaned ore in industrial ovens
where it is heated until it is transformed into a molten state. As the ore melts, impurities
are released from the ore which tend to congregate at the top or bottom of the molten
material. This material is then manually inspected and sorted into three material grades:
A-grade silicon, B-grade silicon, and byproduct.
2. Producing a 420 kg Production Grade Ingot
This process will generate production grade ingots of polycrystalline silicon that can be
sliced into wafers that can be converted into photovoltaic cells. This process includes 420
kg production crucible preparation, production grade ingot processing.
3. Silicon Brick Production
This process will generate “bricks” of production grade polycrystalline silicon that can be
sawed into silicon wafers. This is achieved through a series of process steps: Ingot
Preparation, Ingot Dicing, Brick Trimming, Brick Inspection and Sizing.
4. The Wire Saw Area
This process will cut the bricks into stacks of wafers. A wire saw is used to perform this
process. When the block sets are removed from the saw, they are placed in a solvent tank
where hot solvents are used to loosen the glue that holds the wafers to the glass substrate.
The process includes block set production and wire saw operation.
5. Wafer Separation and Packing
In this part of the facility, wafer handlers are responsible for dismounting the wafers from
the sliced block mounts. These individual wafers are cleaned and inspected. These
wafers are scrapped. This is the end of the simulated process.
CONCEPTUAL MODEL FORMULATION
PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
In preliminary experimental design, system performance measures would be the amount of
Wafers (parts) shipped by the factory by the end of each month. The factors to be varied would
be the number of shifts, labors and equipment used in the production facility. The level of these
factors to be investigated would also be putting into consideration.
INPUT DATA PREPARATION
EquipmentsInvolved Description(time,type,etc) WitnessElement
Raw Silicon dumpedbytruck Entities
Hoppers 1500kg Buffer
A-grade Silicon 38% Entities
B-grade Silicon 45% Entities
Byproduct 17% Entities
Ore cleaningbasket Quantity= 1 Buffer
QuieuingConveyer Basketconveyed Conveyer
ore cleaner 50 minutes activity
chemical process 10 minuteseach machine station
industrial dryers 90 minutes machine station
furnaces Quantity= 1 activity
PrimaryRinse 10 minutes activity
Base Rinse 10 minutes activity
Base Bath 10 minutes activity
DeionizedWaterRinse 10 minutes activity
AcidBath 10 minutes activity
600 kg crucible Quantity= 1 Entities
420 kg crucible Quantity= 1 Entities
release agent Quantity= 1 activites
storage 6 bakedcrucible buffer
Oven 4 crucible activity
inspection Quantity= 1 activity
release agent Quantity= 1 activity
material bin Quantity= 1 buffer
PaintBooth 600 kg Batch Machine
coolingcycle 10 hours buffer
purificationcrucible attribute activity
hydrauliccoolingstation Quantity= 1 machine station
crushingstation batch machine machine station
crucible preparation Single Machine activity
brickproductionarea setuptime 17 machine station
saw dicingpallet (12 hours)cutting,removal activity
brickinspector Quantity= 1 activity
wire saw loadand unload machine/activity
operator Quantity= 1 activity
solventtank productiontype machine
shipment packing activity
A-Bin 120 kg Buffer
B-Bin 121 kg Buffer
c-Bin 122 kg Buffer
Excel SheetAnalytical Model
MODEL TRANSLATION
I have broken down the model phase into two phases.
Phase 1: First of all the raw silicon ore is sent to the ore cleaner. The raw silicon will be stored to
hoppers which deliver the crushed silicon ore to the factory’s ore purification facility. Then it is
dried and sent to preparation machine where it produces A grade material, B grade material and
by product. For Purification crucible is sent to the crushing system and then a sorting system.
After that they are sent to A grade, B grade holding bin and recycled through factory or sent to
the production line, the waste product is then sent back to the mine.
Phase 2: For the production line, the good crucible is sent through the production line
where it is cut, glued and separated into blocks and then put in the solvent tanks. Then
“bricks” are produced through a series of process steps: Ingot Preparation, Ingot Dicing,
Brick Trimming, Brick Inspection and Sizing. The bricks then are cut into stacks of
wafers through wire saw. Lastly these wafers are separated and packed.
VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
The model confirms that it operates the way as intended without any errors. The model runs all
the way to 12 months without any blockage. The model works well since all the system elements
such as entities, activities, resources and controls have no errors and are processed as the analysts
expected. Therefore I assume that it is a valid model.
Base Model
Overall Statistics of my base model:
When I ran my model to 564,480 minutes (an additional one year in minutes), I found the busiest machine
to be furnace in my model that has busy percentage of 74.91%. The labor, assembler has busy percentage
of 46.44%. Therefore I can assume that the bottleneck of my model or system is furnace. When I ran the
model to 564,480 minutes with 40320 minute warm up, I have a total of 3746 wafer stacks
shipped.
FINAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
The base model produced will be used in my final experimental design. When I ran the model to
564,480 minutes with 40320 minute warm up period by having seven workers working 8hrs shift
5 days a week, I have a total of 3746 wafer stacks shipped in my base model. I modified my
model every month by adding the furnace, adding wire saw, giving shift to the operators and
more and finally came up with the Final model which is MONTH 12 model where I have a total
of 31322 wafer stacks. Below is my Model:
FINAL MODEL
EXPERIMENTATION
Month 1
I added a furnace in the first month. When I ran this model to 564,480 minutes with 40320
minute warm up, I have a total of 7365 wafer stacks shipped.
Month 2
I added shift to cleaner, assembler and operator to night shift. When I ran this model to 564,480
minutes with 40320 minute warm up, I have a total of 8312 wafer stacks shipped.
Month 3
I added a wire saw in this month. When I ran this model to 564,480 minutes with 40320 minute
warm up, I have a total of 9454 wafer stacks shipped.
Month 4
I added one more furnace in this month. When I ran this model to 564,480 minutes with 40320
minute warm up, I have a total of 11279 wafer stacks shipped.
Month 5
I assigned assembler to work in waffle handling station. Then I assigned Assembler morning
shift and wafer handler night shift. In this case I have a total of 11867 wafer stacks.
Month 6
I added one more furnace in this month. In this case I have a total of 13886 wafer stacks.
Month 7
I added morning shift to Saw operator, Furnace operator and Cleaner and then added night shift
to Purifying operator, Inspector and Saw operator. In this case I have a total of 16231 wafer
stacks.
Month 8
I added two more paint booth and two more soaking station. In this case I have a total of 17634
wafer stacks.
Month 9
I added a furnace in this month. I have a total of 18188 wafer stacks.
Month 10
I added shift to all the operators in this month. I have a total of 23077 wafer stacks.
Month 11
I added two more furnaces in this month. I have a total of 31158 wafer stacks.
Month 12
I added one more wire saw in this month. I have a total of 31322 wafer stacks which seems to be
my best model.
Month 12 is the optimize model for me at 31322 wafer stacks. So my Final Model is my model
at MONTH 12.
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Month Activity Expenditure Moneyleftover Outputina year
1 Adda furnace 600K 0 7365
2
AddShiftto Clener- night
AddShiftto Assembler- night
AddShiftto Furnace
Operator- night 300K 300K 8312
3 Wire saw 700K 200K 9454
4 Furnace 600K 200K 11279
5
Assembler- Morningshift
Wafferhandler- nightshift 200K 600K 11867
6 Furnace 600K 600K 13886
7
Add Shift- Saw
operator,Furnace operator,
Assembler,Purifyingoperator,
InspectorandWafer Handler 600K 600K 16231
8
twopaint_booth
twosoakingstation 500K 700K 17634
9 Furnace 600K 700K 18188
10
Add Shift- Saw
operator,Furnace
operator,Cleaner,Inspector,
WaferHandlerand Assembler 600K 700K 23077
11 Furnace 1200K 100K 31158
12 Wire saw 700K 0 31322
Thus it is clear through the graph that my wafer stacks are being increasing from month 1 to
month 12. In Month 12, I got the maximum numbers of wafer stacks that is 31322 wafer stacks.
This would be a good model to use for the factory; the cost of the model will be minimum with
the maximum number of wafers produced. Also one can notice this factory only required seven
employees and still have very efficient production.
IMPLEMENTATION AND DOCUMENTATION
Hence, I made improvements on my base model on the every month basis by adding the
furnace, wire saw, paint booth, soaking station and sometimes giving shift to the operators, and
finally came up with the final model which is month 12 model where I have a total of 31322
wafer stacks. Thus, I recommend this model to New World Energy take to construct the 1.0
megawatt/month facility based on the 600K per month capital investment limit. I believe that I
have presented my results clearly, concisely, and convincingly. All the results have been clearly
understood, accepted, and used.
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
WaferStacks
Months
Wafer Stacks VS Month
Wafer Stacks

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Single crystal casting
Single crystal castingSingle crystal casting
Single crystal castingsundar sivam
 
CRYSTAL GROWTH TECHNIQUES
CRYSTAL GROWTH TECHNIQUESCRYSTAL GROWTH TECHNIQUES
CRYSTAL GROWTH TECHNIQUESSHASHI SHAW
 
3. crystal growth and wafer fabrication
3. crystal growth and wafer fabrication3. crystal growth and wafer fabrication
3. crystal growth and wafer fabricationBhargav Veepuri
 
CMOS Topic 2 -manufacturing_process
CMOS Topic 2 -manufacturing_processCMOS Topic 2 -manufacturing_process
CMOS Topic 2 -manufacturing_processIkhwan_Fakrudin
 
Lecture 2 ic fabrication processing & wafer preparation
Lecture 2 ic fabrication processing & wafer preparationLecture 2 ic fabrication processing & wafer preparation
Lecture 2 ic fabrication processing & wafer preparationDr. Ghanshyam Singh
 
Methods for single crystal growth97
Methods for single crystal growth97Methods for single crystal growth97
Methods for single crystal growth97chavansamfb
 
Wafer manufacturing process
Wafer manufacturing processWafer manufacturing process
Wafer manufacturing processadi mandloi
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Single crystal casting
Single crystal castingSingle crystal casting
Single crystal casting
 
CRYSTAL GROWTH TECHNIQUES
CRYSTAL GROWTH TECHNIQUESCRYSTAL GROWTH TECHNIQUES
CRYSTAL GROWTH TECHNIQUES
 
Crystal Growth
Crystal GrowthCrystal Growth
Crystal Growth
 
3. crystal growth and wafer fabrication
3. crystal growth and wafer fabrication3. crystal growth and wafer fabrication
3. crystal growth and wafer fabrication
 
CMOS Topic 2 -manufacturing_process
CMOS Topic 2 -manufacturing_processCMOS Topic 2 -manufacturing_process
CMOS Topic 2 -manufacturing_process
 
Lecture 2 ic fabrication processing & wafer preparation
Lecture 2 ic fabrication processing & wafer preparationLecture 2 ic fabrication processing & wafer preparation
Lecture 2 ic fabrication processing & wafer preparation
 
Methods for single crystal growth97
Methods for single crystal growth97Methods for single crystal growth97
Methods for single crystal growth97
 
Wafer manufacturing process
Wafer manufacturing processWafer manufacturing process
Wafer manufacturing process
 

Similar to Ukesh Simulation Project

Simulation project
Simulation projectSimulation project
Simulation projectJAPAN SHAH
 
PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT OF PRE-TREATMENTS & POWDER COATING PROCESS.
PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT OF PRE-TREATMENTS & POWDER COATING PROCESS.PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT OF PRE-TREATMENTS & POWDER COATING PROCESS.
PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT OF PRE-TREATMENTS & POWDER COATING PROCESS.Raheem Arif
 
Pulse Electrical Current Assisted Sinter Rolling Mill
Pulse Electrical Current Assisted Sinter Rolling MillPulse Electrical Current Assisted Sinter Rolling Mill
Pulse Electrical Current Assisted Sinter Rolling MillWassim Shirry
 
IMPROVEMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES BY USING WORK STUDY METHODS: A CASE STUDY
IMPROVEMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES BY USING WORK STUDY METHODS: A CASE STUDYIMPROVEMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES BY USING WORK STUDY METHODS: A CASE STUDY
IMPROVEMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES BY USING WORK STUDY METHODS: A CASE STUDYIAEME Publication
 
Simulation of New World Energy PV Panel Production Facility
Simulation of New World Energy PV Panel Production Facility Simulation of New World Energy PV Panel Production Facility
Simulation of New World Energy PV Panel Production Facility Someshwar Rao S S V
 
Case study electronics industry
Case study   electronics industryCase study   electronics industry
Case study electronics industryGanesh TN
 
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ring
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ringA case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ring
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ringIJECSJournal
 
Presntation (MNIT).pptx
Presntation (MNIT).pptxPresntation (MNIT).pptx
Presntation (MNIT).pptxrajtashee725
 
Paint Plant RFT Continuous Improvement Presentation (2) (2)
Paint Plant RFT Continuous Improvement Presentation (2) (2)Paint Plant RFT Continuous Improvement Presentation (2) (2)
Paint Plant RFT Continuous Improvement Presentation (2) (2)Paul Cunningham.( 07950461867 )
 
Handout 050107
Handout 050107Handout 050107
Handout 050107Joe King
 
Operations Research & Methodology project report
Operations Research & Methodology  project reportOperations Research & Methodology  project report
Operations Research & Methodology project reportPankaj Kumar Dwivedi
 
Industrial plants and safety project
Industrial plants and safety projectIndustrial plants and safety project
Industrial plants and safety projectNikoZurabishvili
 
Reformation in Existing Micro Size Laundry System by using Product Design and...
Reformation in Existing Micro Size Laundry System by using Product Design and...Reformation in Existing Micro Size Laundry System by using Product Design and...
Reformation in Existing Micro Size Laundry System by using Product Design and...IRJET Journal
 
Crystal Award Winner
Crystal Award WinnerCrystal Award Winner
Crystal Award WinnerRonald Baroni
 
Lean NMR Laboratory Layout
  Lean NMR Laboratory Layout    Lean NMR Laboratory Layout
Lean NMR Laboratory Layout Javier Siles
 
5.ve volume 1_ve_burton
5.ve volume 1_ve_burton5.ve volume 1_ve_burton
5.ve volume 1_ve_burtonhqdan
 

Similar to Ukesh Simulation Project (20)

Simulation project
Simulation projectSimulation project
Simulation project
 
PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT OF PRE-TREATMENTS & POWDER COATING PROCESS.
PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT OF PRE-TREATMENTS & POWDER COATING PROCESS.PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT OF PRE-TREATMENTS & POWDER COATING PROCESS.
PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT OF PRE-TREATMENTS & POWDER COATING PROCESS.
 
Pulse Electrical Current Assisted Sinter Rolling Mill
Pulse Electrical Current Assisted Sinter Rolling MillPulse Electrical Current Assisted Sinter Rolling Mill
Pulse Electrical Current Assisted Sinter Rolling Mill
 
IMPROVEMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES BY USING WORK STUDY METHODS: A CASE STUDY
IMPROVEMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES BY USING WORK STUDY METHODS: A CASE STUDYIMPROVEMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES BY USING WORK STUDY METHODS: A CASE STUDY
IMPROVEMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES BY USING WORK STUDY METHODS: A CASE STUDY
 
Simulation of New World Energy PV Panel Production Facility
Simulation of New World Energy PV Panel Production Facility Simulation of New World Energy PV Panel Production Facility
Simulation of New World Energy PV Panel Production Facility
 
Case study electronics industry
Case study   electronics industryCase study   electronics industry
Case study electronics industry
 
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ring
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ringA case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ring
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ring
 
Project Review Presentation (2)
Project Review Presentation (2)Project Review Presentation (2)
Project Review Presentation (2)
 
Presntation (MNIT).pptx
Presntation (MNIT).pptxPresntation (MNIT).pptx
Presntation (MNIT).pptx
 
Paint Plant RFT Continuous Improvement Presentation (2) (2)
Paint Plant RFT Continuous Improvement Presentation (2) (2)Paint Plant RFT Continuous Improvement Presentation (2) (2)
Paint Plant RFT Continuous Improvement Presentation (2) (2)
 
Kec training report
Kec training reportKec training report
Kec training report
 
Handout 050107
Handout 050107Handout 050107
Handout 050107
 
CV
CVCV
CV
 
Operations Research & Methodology project report
Operations Research & Methodology  project reportOperations Research & Methodology  project report
Operations Research & Methodology project report
 
6 MONTH INTERNSHIP AT
6 MONTH INTERNSHIP AT6 MONTH INTERNSHIP AT
6 MONTH INTERNSHIP AT
 
Industrial plants and safety project
Industrial plants and safety projectIndustrial plants and safety project
Industrial plants and safety project
 
Reformation in Existing Micro Size Laundry System by using Product Design and...
Reformation in Existing Micro Size Laundry System by using Product Design and...Reformation in Existing Micro Size Laundry System by using Product Design and...
Reformation in Existing Micro Size Laundry System by using Product Design and...
 
Crystal Award Winner
Crystal Award WinnerCrystal Award Winner
Crystal Award Winner
 
Lean NMR Laboratory Layout
  Lean NMR Laboratory Layout    Lean NMR Laboratory Layout
Lean NMR Laboratory Layout
 
5.ve volume 1_ve_burton
5.ve volume 1_ve_burton5.ve volume 1_ve_burton
5.ve volume 1_ve_burton
 

More from Chawal Ukesh

Stochastic final report
Stochastic final reportStochastic final report
Stochastic final reportChawal Ukesh
 
System Engineering Project - Team 2
System Engineering Project - Team 2System Engineering Project - Team 2
System Engineering Project - Team 2Chawal Ukesh
 
Linear Programming Project
Linear Programming ProjectLinear Programming Project
Linear Programming ProjectChawal Ukesh
 
MLR Project (Onion)
MLR Project (Onion)MLR Project (Onion)
MLR Project (Onion)Chawal Ukesh
 
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - Regrind
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - RegrindLean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - Regrind
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - RegrindChawal Ukesh
 
Ukesh Work Sampling Project - Time Study
Ukesh  Work Sampling Project - Time StudyUkesh  Work Sampling Project - Time Study
Ukesh Work Sampling Project - Time StudyChawal Ukesh
 
Senior Design Project
Senior Design ProjectSenior Design Project
Senior Design ProjectChawal Ukesh
 
Material handling student design competition
Material handling student design competitionMaterial handling student design competition
Material handling student design competitionChawal Ukesh
 

More from Chawal Ukesh (10)

Stochastic final report
Stochastic final reportStochastic final report
Stochastic final report
 
Final Report
Final ReportFinal Report
Final Report
 
System Engineering Project - Team 2
System Engineering Project - Team 2System Engineering Project - Team 2
System Engineering Project - Team 2
 
Linear Programming Project
Linear Programming ProjectLinear Programming Project
Linear Programming Project
 
MLR Project (Onion)
MLR Project (Onion)MLR Project (Onion)
MLR Project (Onion)
 
DP Project Report
DP Project ReportDP Project Report
DP Project Report
 
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - Regrind
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - RegrindLean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - Regrind
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - Regrind
 
Ukesh Work Sampling Project - Time Study
Ukesh  Work Sampling Project - Time StudyUkesh  Work Sampling Project - Time Study
Ukesh Work Sampling Project - Time Study
 
Senior Design Project
Senior Design ProjectSenior Design Project
Senior Design Project
 
Material handling student design competition
Material handling student design competitionMaterial handling student design competition
Material handling student design competition
 

Ukesh Simulation Project

  • 1. SIMULATION PROJECT B Y Ukesh ChawaL 1000796687 DR. Brian HUFF IE 4322 Spring 2013
  • 2. PROBLEM DEFINITION Technology Exporters U.S.A has been hired by New World Energy’s (NWE) board to assist in the planning and design of the proposed 1.0 Megawatt/Month PV panel production facility which is basically the goal of the study. The purpose of the study is to report Heinrich Grünfuror, NWE’s Chief Technical Officer by generating a process plan, based on the information provided, for the PV panel production process. Some of the questions that may be encountered during our study are how to generate a process plan, how to produce a graphical representation of this production process, how much of a capital investment will NWE have to make to develop a pilot production facility in Akureyri Iceland, what will be NWE’s total capital investment for the final production facility, what will your staffing requirements be for the pilot production facility, what shift patterns and staffing levels should be used to run the Akureyri facility during each phase of our production expansion. Once the pilot production facility is up and running, the NWE board will allocate a maximum of $600,000 per month in new capital investment provided that each additional investment of capital can be proven to result in a significant increase in PV panel production numbers. Based in this funding profile, provide an estimated capitalization plan for incrementally bringing the Akureyri facility up to full capacity. This may be considered as the problem we may face during the project because we have to spend under $600,000 per month. Also we have to manage the shift of our staffs and manage the proper staffing levels in proper time. Moreover, there will be some problems while preparing source silicon material such doing purification by removing contaminants and oxides from raw silicon. These are problems which we must know in order to solve them.
  • 3. PROJECT PLANNING Event Time Date Resource Understand and Define the Problem 2 hours 3/25/13 Handout Project Planning 3 hours 3/26/13 Excel System Definition 3 hours 3/27/13 Word Conceptual Model Formulation 6 days 3/2813 - 4/3/13 Flow Chart, Igrafx Preliminary Experimental Design 3 hours 4/4/13 Word Input Data Preparation 5 days 4/5/13 – 4/9/13 Excel, Word Model Translation (Do simulation on the Model) 7 days 4/10/13 – 4/16/13 witness 2.0 Verification & Validation (Analysis the Model with Different changing Tasks) 2 days 4/17/13 – 4/18/13 witness 2.0,Word Final Experimental Design (Use the resource Given by Technology Exporters U.S.A) 2 days 4/19/13 – 4/20/13 witness 2.0 Experimentation 8 days 4/21/13 – 4/28/13 witness 2.0, Excel, Graph Analysis and Interpretation (Answer Mr. Grunfuror’s questions) 4 hours 4/29/13 Word, witness 2.0 Implementation and Documentation (Write and concluded the results with a report) 2 days 4/30/13 – 5/1/13 Excel, witness 2.0
  • 4. SYSTEM DEFINITION 1. Preparing Source Silicon Material The raw mined silicon must be cleaned and purified before it can be used for silicon wafer production. The raw silicon will be provided to the factory by the truck load. The raw silicon will be stored to hoppers which deliver the crushed silicon ore to the factory’s ore purification facility. The objective of the ore purification process is to remove mineral contaminants and oxides from the raw silicon. This is done by first cleaning the silicon ore using a chemical cleaning process and then placing the cleaned ore in industrial ovens where it is heated until it is transformed into a molten state. As the ore melts, impurities are released from the ore which tend to congregate at the top or bottom of the molten material. This material is then manually inspected and sorted into three material grades: A-grade silicon, B-grade silicon, and byproduct. 2. Producing a 420 kg Production Grade Ingot This process will generate production grade ingots of polycrystalline silicon that can be sliced into wafers that can be converted into photovoltaic cells. This process includes 420 kg production crucible preparation, production grade ingot processing. 3. Silicon Brick Production This process will generate “bricks” of production grade polycrystalline silicon that can be sawed into silicon wafers. This is achieved through a series of process steps: Ingot Preparation, Ingot Dicing, Brick Trimming, Brick Inspection and Sizing. 4. The Wire Saw Area This process will cut the bricks into stacks of wafers. A wire saw is used to perform this process. When the block sets are removed from the saw, they are placed in a solvent tank where hot solvents are used to loosen the glue that holds the wafers to the glass substrate. The process includes block set production and wire saw operation. 5. Wafer Separation and Packing
  • 5. In this part of the facility, wafer handlers are responsible for dismounting the wafers from the sliced block mounts. These individual wafers are cleaned and inspected. These wafers are scrapped. This is the end of the simulated process. CONCEPTUAL MODEL FORMULATION
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8. PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN In preliminary experimental design, system performance measures would be the amount of Wafers (parts) shipped by the factory by the end of each month. The factors to be varied would be the number of shifts, labors and equipment used in the production facility. The level of these factors to be investigated would also be putting into consideration. INPUT DATA PREPARATION EquipmentsInvolved Description(time,type,etc) WitnessElement Raw Silicon dumpedbytruck Entities Hoppers 1500kg Buffer A-grade Silicon 38% Entities B-grade Silicon 45% Entities Byproduct 17% Entities Ore cleaningbasket Quantity= 1 Buffer QuieuingConveyer Basketconveyed Conveyer ore cleaner 50 minutes activity chemical process 10 minuteseach machine station industrial dryers 90 minutes machine station furnaces Quantity= 1 activity PrimaryRinse 10 minutes activity Base Rinse 10 minutes activity Base Bath 10 minutes activity DeionizedWaterRinse 10 minutes activity AcidBath 10 minutes activity 600 kg crucible Quantity= 1 Entities 420 kg crucible Quantity= 1 Entities release agent Quantity= 1 activites storage 6 bakedcrucible buffer
  • 9. Oven 4 crucible activity inspection Quantity= 1 activity release agent Quantity= 1 activity material bin Quantity= 1 buffer PaintBooth 600 kg Batch Machine coolingcycle 10 hours buffer purificationcrucible attribute activity hydrauliccoolingstation Quantity= 1 machine station crushingstation batch machine machine station crucible preparation Single Machine activity brickproductionarea setuptime 17 machine station saw dicingpallet (12 hours)cutting,removal activity brickinspector Quantity= 1 activity wire saw loadand unload machine/activity operator Quantity= 1 activity solventtank productiontype machine shipment packing activity A-Bin 120 kg Buffer B-Bin 121 kg Buffer c-Bin 122 kg Buffer
  • 11. MODEL TRANSLATION I have broken down the model phase into two phases. Phase 1: First of all the raw silicon ore is sent to the ore cleaner. The raw silicon will be stored to hoppers which deliver the crushed silicon ore to the factory’s ore purification facility. Then it is dried and sent to preparation machine where it produces A grade material, B grade material and by product. For Purification crucible is sent to the crushing system and then a sorting system. After that they are sent to A grade, B grade holding bin and recycled through factory or sent to the production line, the waste product is then sent back to the mine.
  • 12. Phase 2: For the production line, the good crucible is sent through the production line where it is cut, glued and separated into blocks and then put in the solvent tanks. Then “bricks” are produced through a series of process steps: Ingot Preparation, Ingot Dicing, Brick Trimming, Brick Inspection and Sizing. The bricks then are cut into stacks of wafers through wire saw. Lastly these wafers are separated and packed. VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION The model confirms that it operates the way as intended without any errors. The model runs all the way to 12 months without any blockage. The model works well since all the system elements such as entities, activities, resources and controls have no errors and are processed as the analysts expected. Therefore I assume that it is a valid model.
  • 14. Overall Statistics of my base model:
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17. When I ran my model to 564,480 minutes (an additional one year in minutes), I found the busiest machine to be furnace in my model that has busy percentage of 74.91%. The labor, assembler has busy percentage of 46.44%. Therefore I can assume that the bottleneck of my model or system is furnace. When I ran the model to 564,480 minutes with 40320 minute warm up, I have a total of 3746 wafer stacks shipped.
  • 18. FINAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The base model produced will be used in my final experimental design. When I ran the model to 564,480 minutes with 40320 minute warm up period by having seven workers working 8hrs shift 5 days a week, I have a total of 3746 wafer stacks shipped in my base model. I modified my model every month by adding the furnace, adding wire saw, giving shift to the operators and more and finally came up with the Final model which is MONTH 12 model where I have a total of 31322 wafer stacks. Below is my Model: FINAL MODEL
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22. EXPERIMENTATION Month 1 I added a furnace in the first month. When I ran this model to 564,480 minutes with 40320 minute warm up, I have a total of 7365 wafer stacks shipped. Month 2 I added shift to cleaner, assembler and operator to night shift. When I ran this model to 564,480 minutes with 40320 minute warm up, I have a total of 8312 wafer stacks shipped. Month 3 I added a wire saw in this month. When I ran this model to 564,480 minutes with 40320 minute warm up, I have a total of 9454 wafer stacks shipped.
  • 23. Month 4 I added one more furnace in this month. When I ran this model to 564,480 minutes with 40320 minute warm up, I have a total of 11279 wafer stacks shipped. Month 5 I assigned assembler to work in waffle handling station. Then I assigned Assembler morning shift and wafer handler night shift. In this case I have a total of 11867 wafer stacks. Month 6 I added one more furnace in this month. In this case I have a total of 13886 wafer stacks.
  • 24. Month 7 I added morning shift to Saw operator, Furnace operator and Cleaner and then added night shift to Purifying operator, Inspector and Saw operator. In this case I have a total of 16231 wafer stacks. Month 8 I added two more paint booth and two more soaking station. In this case I have a total of 17634 wafer stacks. Month 9 I added a furnace in this month. I have a total of 18188 wafer stacks.
  • 25. Month 10 I added shift to all the operators in this month. I have a total of 23077 wafer stacks. Month 11 I added two more furnaces in this month. I have a total of 31158 wafer stacks. Month 12 I added one more wire saw in this month. I have a total of 31322 wafer stacks which seems to be my best model. Month 12 is the optimize model for me at 31322 wafer stacks. So my Final Model is my model at MONTH 12.
  • 26. ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION Month Activity Expenditure Moneyleftover Outputina year 1 Adda furnace 600K 0 7365 2 AddShiftto Clener- night AddShiftto Assembler- night AddShiftto Furnace Operator- night 300K 300K 8312 3 Wire saw 700K 200K 9454 4 Furnace 600K 200K 11279 5 Assembler- Morningshift Wafferhandler- nightshift 200K 600K 11867 6 Furnace 600K 600K 13886 7 Add Shift- Saw operator,Furnace operator, Assembler,Purifyingoperator, InspectorandWafer Handler 600K 600K 16231 8 twopaint_booth twosoakingstation 500K 700K 17634 9 Furnace 600K 700K 18188 10 Add Shift- Saw operator,Furnace operator,Cleaner,Inspector, WaferHandlerand Assembler 600K 700K 23077 11 Furnace 1200K 100K 31158 12 Wire saw 700K 0 31322
  • 27. Thus it is clear through the graph that my wafer stacks are being increasing from month 1 to month 12. In Month 12, I got the maximum numbers of wafer stacks that is 31322 wafer stacks. This would be a good model to use for the factory; the cost of the model will be minimum with the maximum number of wafers produced. Also one can notice this factory only required seven employees and still have very efficient production. IMPLEMENTATION AND DOCUMENTATION Hence, I made improvements on my base model on the every month basis by adding the furnace, wire saw, paint booth, soaking station and sometimes giving shift to the operators, and finally came up with the final model which is month 12 model where I have a total of 31322 wafer stacks. Thus, I recommend this model to New World Energy take to construct the 1.0 megawatt/month facility based on the 600K per month capital investment limit. I believe that I have presented my results clearly, concisely, and convincingly. All the results have been clearly understood, accepted, and used. 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 WaferStacks Months Wafer Stacks VS Month Wafer Stacks