SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 16
MATERIAL HANDLING STUDENT DESIGN
COMPETITION
Facility Planning
JARRETT WALDEN
INDRA POUDEL
SANTOSH PAUDEL
UKESH CHAWAL
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE
ABC, Inc. currently operates a chain of 200 retail
stores across the US. Its product line is home
electronics like cameras, laptops, tablets, mobiles,
video games. ABC, Inc. currently services its stores
from 2 distribution center campuses, one services the
Eastern US and the other the Western US.
The objective of this project is to redesign the picking
process of ABC, Inc. to support changes in the
ordering profiles of the “clients” of their distribution
centers.
PAIN POINTS
 The Western DC doesn’t have enough space.
 No task interleaving capabilities.
 Rush orders cannot be added on the fly to store
waves.
 Lead-time of replenishment orders to stores can take
up to 10 days. New small stores want overnight
deliveries.
 If a worker identifies a problem with a location, the
system cannot put the location on-hold.
 Repack volume has significantly increased.
 Too many work around workflows required.
 Sortation.
DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS CONSIDERED
Pick to Light (PTL)
Pick to light is the visual technology that enhances
high speed of picking with high accuracy. The light
display identifies the pick and the header display
unit indicates pick quantity. The operator typically
pushes a button on the light display to confirm the
pick task. After all picks are completed pass
indicator illuminate picker ID. This picker ID is
submissively captured with Watch Me device.
WHY PTL IS BEST
Voice RF PTL
Pick Productivity in High Density Areas 2 2 3
Freedom to use both hands 3 1 3
Ability to get directions 2 2 3
Providing completion information 2 3 3
Initial system "training" 1 3 3
Dependence on selector's memory 1 3 3
Last-steps identification of next location 1 2 3
Battery replacement 1 1 3
TEAM ASSUMPTIONS
 For every 2500 SKUs, total number of
operators needed = 25
 For every 2500 SKUs, the cost of installation
of PTL system = $250,000
 For every SKU, total income = $250
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Year Initial SKUs # of Employees Income
2014 40,700 SKUs 34 $10,175,000
2015 53,590 SKUs 45 $13,397,500
2016 78,830 SKUs 67 $19,707,500
2017 130,300 SKUs 110 $32,575,000
2018 181,077 SKUs 152 $45,269,250
2019 483,870 SKUs 407 $120,967,500
CALCULATION
• Initial time spent for picking with Voice = 6 minutes per
SKU
• Time spent for picking with PTL = 5 minutes per SKU
• Time saved per SKU(in percentage) = 16.67%
New Total SKU Shipped with PTLYear SKUs Income
2014 47,619 $11,904,750
2015 62,700 $15,675,000
2016 92,231 $23,057,750
2017 152,451 $38,112,750
2018 211,860 $52,965,000
2019 566,127 $141,531,750
CALCULATION CONTD…
Expenditure = labor cost + operating cost
Given, Labor cost per hour = $21.35
Year Expenditure Profit from voice Profit from PTL
2014 $7,995,667 $2,179,333 $3,909,083
2015 $6,484,736 $6,912,764 $9,190,264
2016 $10,259,873 $9,447,627 $12,797,877
2017 $17,847,688 $14,727,312 $20,265,062
2018 $22,627,741 $22,641,509 $30,337,259
2019 $77,271,845 $43,695,655 $64,259,905
PROCESS FLOW
Receiving
Putaway
Allocation
Picking
Eaches Full Case
Shipping
Sorter
Building A
Supplier
Shipped as
Eaches Picking
Building B
Labeled for Put
away
Labeled for Put
away
Shipped as Full
Case Picking
Operator Preps
Item
Operator Preps
Item
Sent to FPL or
reserve locations
Sent to FPL or
reserve locations
Receiving
Putaway
Is it demand larger than
product case quantity ?
Ready for picking
Start finding cases
to fill a pallet
Ready for picking
Ready for picking
Ready for picking
Did FPL run out of stock
today?
Start picking full
cases
Allocation
NO NOYES YES
Eaches Picking Full Case Picking
Workers Push
totes and gather
order
requirements
Workers take totes
to a takeaway
conveyor
Conveyor takes
Orders to the
shipping sorter
Can it be put on
totes or conveyed
Put on a pallet and
transported to
shipping area by
vehicle
Put on a conveyor
Conveyor goes to
shipping sorter
Picking
NO YES
MODIFIED CAD LAYOUT FOR THE
RECOMMENDED OPTION.
CONCLUSION
Thus, PTL is the best system because the
profit from PTL system is higher than that from
Voice system.
Year Net Profit
(PTL Profit – Voice Profit)
2014 $1,729,750
2015 $2,277,500
2016 $3,350,250
2017 $5,537,750
2018 $7,695,750
2019 $20,564,250
REFERENCES
http://www.cornerstoneautosys.co.uk/pick-to-light.htm
http://www.idii.com/wp/AdsCompare.pdf
http://www.mwpvl.com/html/order_pick_technologies.
html

More Related Content

Similar to Material handling student design competition

How gilt implemented a successful labor management system ops summit 2013
How gilt implemented a successful labor management system ops summit 2013How gilt implemented a successful labor management system ops summit 2013
How gilt implemented a successful labor management system ops summit 2013Steve Johnson
 
OpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of working
OpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of workingOpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of working
OpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of workingOpenText Portfolio
 
Utsav Mahendra : Bakers and cakes
Utsav Mahendra : Bakers and cakesUtsav Mahendra : Bakers and cakes
Utsav Mahendra : Bakers and cakesUtsav Mahendra
 
Hult Business Plan Competition Plan- Team Simon TANC
Hult Business Plan Competition Plan- Team Simon TANCHult Business Plan Competition Plan- Team Simon TANC
Hult Business Plan Competition Plan- Team Simon TANCChris DiGiacomandrea
 
Splunk 4 Ninja ITSI Workshop
Splunk 4 Ninja ITSI WorkshopSplunk 4 Ninja ITSI Workshop
Splunk 4 Ninja ITSI WorkshopMarc Serieys
 
OKIE811 - State of the Company 2017
OKIE811 - State of the Company 2017OKIE811 - State of the Company 2017
OKIE811 - State of the Company 2017Susan Bohl
 
B2B Final Project - NCR ATM's
B2B Final Project - NCR ATM'sB2B Final Project - NCR ATM's
B2B Final Project - NCR ATM'sFamy
 
Case sharing budget allocation
Case sharing budget allocationCase sharing budget allocation
Case sharing budget allocationThiện Quang
 
Production & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre ReviewProduction & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre ReviewRamon Fernandez, MBA
 
2015 Research Valley Partnership Compliance Report
2015 Research Valley Partnership Compliance Report2015 Research Valley Partnership Compliance Report
2015 Research Valley Partnership Compliance ReportCity of College Station
 
Hansen aise im ch04
Hansen aise im ch04Hansen aise im ch04
Hansen aise im ch04Daeng Aiman
 
TechStars presentation - Financial presentations for investors
TechStars presentation - Financial presentations for investorsTechStars presentation - Financial presentations for investors
TechStars presentation - Financial presentations for investorsDavid Fogel
 
A systematic approach to reducing churn
A systematic approach to reducing churnA systematic approach to reducing churn
A systematic approach to reducing churnDavid Stein
 
Final Presentation Insight-2
Final Presentation Insight-2Final Presentation Insight-2
Final Presentation Insight-2Carl Schiro
 
Symposium 2016 : CONF. 401 Jonathan Shriqui EVM: Go Beyond the Numbers
Symposium 2016 : CONF. 401  Jonathan Shriqui EVM: Go Beyond the NumbersSymposium 2016 : CONF. 401  Jonathan Shriqui EVM: Go Beyond the Numbers
Symposium 2016 : CONF. 401 Jonathan Shriqui EVM: Go Beyond the NumbersPMI-Montréal
 

Similar to Material handling student design competition (20)

How gilt implemented a successful labor management system ops summit 2013
How gilt implemented a successful labor management system ops summit 2013How gilt implemented a successful labor management system ops summit 2013
How gilt implemented a successful labor management system ops summit 2013
 
CoElux Business Plan
CoElux Business PlanCoElux Business Plan
CoElux Business Plan
 
OpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of working
OpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of workingOpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of working
OpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of working
 
Utsav Mahendra : Bakers and cakes
Utsav Mahendra : Bakers and cakesUtsav Mahendra : Bakers and cakes
Utsav Mahendra : Bakers and cakes
 
Hult Business Plan Competition Plan- Team Simon TANC
Hult Business Plan Competition Plan- Team Simon TANCHult Business Plan Competition Plan- Team Simon TANC
Hult Business Plan Competition Plan- Team Simon TANC
 
Splunk 4 Ninja ITSI Workshop
Splunk 4 Ninja ITSI WorkshopSplunk 4 Ninja ITSI Workshop
Splunk 4 Ninja ITSI Workshop
 
OKIE811 - State of the Company 2017
OKIE811 - State of the Company 2017OKIE811 - State of the Company 2017
OKIE811 - State of the Company 2017
 
B2B Final Project - NCR ATM's
B2B Final Project - NCR ATM'sB2B Final Project - NCR ATM's
B2B Final Project - NCR ATM's
 
Case sharing budget allocation
Case sharing budget allocationCase sharing budget allocation
Case sharing budget allocation
 
Production & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre ReviewProduction & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre Review
 
2015 Research Valley Partnership Compliance Report
2015 Research Valley Partnership Compliance Report2015 Research Valley Partnership Compliance Report
2015 Research Valley Partnership Compliance Report
 
Hansen aise im ch04
Hansen aise im ch04Hansen aise im ch04
Hansen aise im ch04
 
TechStars presentation - Financial presentations for investors
TechStars presentation - Financial presentations for investorsTechStars presentation - Financial presentations for investors
TechStars presentation - Financial presentations for investors
 
Bengkel POM
Bengkel POMBengkel POM
Bengkel POM
 
Ark Scorecard V2 build
Ark Scorecard V2 buildArk Scorecard V2 build
Ark Scorecard V2 build
 
A systematic approach to reducing churn
A systematic approach to reducing churnA systematic approach to reducing churn
A systematic approach to reducing churn
 
30% Profit
30% Profit30% Profit
30% Profit
 
Ark Scorecard v3 Operations
Ark Scorecard v3 OperationsArk Scorecard v3 Operations
Ark Scorecard v3 Operations
 
Final Presentation Insight-2
Final Presentation Insight-2Final Presentation Insight-2
Final Presentation Insight-2
 
Symposium 2016 : CONF. 401 Jonathan Shriqui EVM: Go Beyond the Numbers
Symposium 2016 : CONF. 401  Jonathan Shriqui EVM: Go Beyond the NumbersSymposium 2016 : CONF. 401  Jonathan Shriqui EVM: Go Beyond the Numbers
Symposium 2016 : CONF. 401 Jonathan Shriqui EVM: Go Beyond the Numbers
 

More from Chawal Ukesh

Stochastic final report
Stochastic final reportStochastic final report
Stochastic final reportChawal Ukesh
 
System Engineering Project - Team 2
System Engineering Project - Team 2System Engineering Project - Team 2
System Engineering Project - Team 2Chawal Ukesh
 
Linear Programming Project
Linear Programming ProjectLinear Programming Project
Linear Programming ProjectChawal Ukesh
 
MLR Project (Onion)
MLR Project (Onion)MLR Project (Onion)
MLR Project (Onion)Chawal Ukesh
 
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - Regrind
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - RegrindLean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - Regrind
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - RegrindChawal Ukesh
 
Ukesh Work Sampling Project - Time Study
Ukesh  Work Sampling Project - Time StudyUkesh  Work Sampling Project - Time Study
Ukesh Work Sampling Project - Time StudyChawal Ukesh
 
Senior Design Project
Senior Design ProjectSenior Design Project
Senior Design ProjectChawal Ukesh
 
Ukesh Simulation Project
Ukesh Simulation ProjectUkesh Simulation Project
Ukesh Simulation ProjectChawal Ukesh
 

More from Chawal Ukesh (10)

Stochastic final report
Stochastic final reportStochastic final report
Stochastic final report
 
Final Report
Final ReportFinal Report
Final Report
 
System Engineering Project - Team 2
System Engineering Project - Team 2System Engineering Project - Team 2
System Engineering Project - Team 2
 
Linear Programming Project
Linear Programming ProjectLinear Programming Project
Linear Programming Project
 
MLR Project (Onion)
MLR Project (Onion)MLR Project (Onion)
MLR Project (Onion)
 
DP Project Report
DP Project ReportDP Project Report
DP Project Report
 
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - Regrind
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - RegrindLean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - Regrind
Lean Six Sigma Greenbelt Project B - Regrind
 
Ukesh Work Sampling Project - Time Study
Ukesh  Work Sampling Project - Time StudyUkesh  Work Sampling Project - Time Study
Ukesh Work Sampling Project - Time Study
 
Senior Design Project
Senior Design ProjectSenior Design Project
Senior Design Project
 
Ukesh Simulation Project
Ukesh Simulation ProjectUkesh Simulation Project
Ukesh Simulation Project
 

Material handling student design competition

  • 1. MATERIAL HANDLING STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION Facility Planning JARRETT WALDEN INDRA POUDEL SANTOSH PAUDEL UKESH CHAWAL
  • 2. INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE ABC, Inc. currently operates a chain of 200 retail stores across the US. Its product line is home electronics like cameras, laptops, tablets, mobiles, video games. ABC, Inc. currently services its stores from 2 distribution center campuses, one services the Eastern US and the other the Western US. The objective of this project is to redesign the picking process of ABC, Inc. to support changes in the ordering profiles of the “clients” of their distribution centers.
  • 3. PAIN POINTS  The Western DC doesn’t have enough space.  No task interleaving capabilities.  Rush orders cannot be added on the fly to store waves.  Lead-time of replenishment orders to stores can take up to 10 days. New small stores want overnight deliveries.  If a worker identifies a problem with a location, the system cannot put the location on-hold.  Repack volume has significantly increased.  Too many work around workflows required.  Sortation.
  • 4. DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS CONSIDERED Pick to Light (PTL) Pick to light is the visual technology that enhances high speed of picking with high accuracy. The light display identifies the pick and the header display unit indicates pick quantity. The operator typically pushes a button on the light display to confirm the pick task. After all picks are completed pass indicator illuminate picker ID. This picker ID is submissively captured with Watch Me device.
  • 5. WHY PTL IS BEST Voice RF PTL Pick Productivity in High Density Areas 2 2 3 Freedom to use both hands 3 1 3 Ability to get directions 2 2 3 Providing completion information 2 3 3 Initial system "training" 1 3 3 Dependence on selector's memory 1 3 3 Last-steps identification of next location 1 2 3 Battery replacement 1 1 3
  • 6. TEAM ASSUMPTIONS  For every 2500 SKUs, total number of operators needed = 25  For every 2500 SKUs, the cost of installation of PTL system = $250,000  For every SKU, total income = $250
  • 7. FINANCIAL SUMMARY Year Initial SKUs # of Employees Income 2014 40,700 SKUs 34 $10,175,000 2015 53,590 SKUs 45 $13,397,500 2016 78,830 SKUs 67 $19,707,500 2017 130,300 SKUs 110 $32,575,000 2018 181,077 SKUs 152 $45,269,250 2019 483,870 SKUs 407 $120,967,500
  • 8. CALCULATION • Initial time spent for picking with Voice = 6 minutes per SKU • Time spent for picking with PTL = 5 minutes per SKU • Time saved per SKU(in percentage) = 16.67% New Total SKU Shipped with PTLYear SKUs Income 2014 47,619 $11,904,750 2015 62,700 $15,675,000 2016 92,231 $23,057,750 2017 152,451 $38,112,750 2018 211,860 $52,965,000 2019 566,127 $141,531,750
  • 9. CALCULATION CONTD… Expenditure = labor cost + operating cost Given, Labor cost per hour = $21.35 Year Expenditure Profit from voice Profit from PTL 2014 $7,995,667 $2,179,333 $3,909,083 2015 $6,484,736 $6,912,764 $9,190,264 2016 $10,259,873 $9,447,627 $12,797,877 2017 $17,847,688 $14,727,312 $20,265,062 2018 $22,627,741 $22,641,509 $30,337,259 2019 $77,271,845 $43,695,655 $64,259,905
  • 11. Building A Supplier Shipped as Eaches Picking Building B Labeled for Put away Labeled for Put away Shipped as Full Case Picking Operator Preps Item Operator Preps Item Sent to FPL or reserve locations Sent to FPL or reserve locations Receiving Putaway
  • 12. Is it demand larger than product case quantity ? Ready for picking Start finding cases to fill a pallet Ready for picking Ready for picking Ready for picking Did FPL run out of stock today? Start picking full cases Allocation NO NOYES YES
  • 13. Eaches Picking Full Case Picking Workers Push totes and gather order requirements Workers take totes to a takeaway conveyor Conveyor takes Orders to the shipping sorter Can it be put on totes or conveyed Put on a pallet and transported to shipping area by vehicle Put on a conveyor Conveyor goes to shipping sorter Picking NO YES
  • 14. MODIFIED CAD LAYOUT FOR THE RECOMMENDED OPTION.
  • 15. CONCLUSION Thus, PTL is the best system because the profit from PTL system is higher than that from Voice system. Year Net Profit (PTL Profit – Voice Profit) 2014 $1,729,750 2015 $2,277,500 2016 $3,350,250 2017 $5,537,750 2018 $7,695,750 2019 $20,564,250