The document outlines a project to increase lead time for flood forecasting in Bangladesh to support agriculture risk management. It discusses (1) developing medium-range ensemble hydrological models using ECMWF forecast data to generate probabilistic discharge forecasts 1-10 days in advance, (2) assessing community vulnerability and needs to determine forecast lead times required for decision making, and (3) disseminating forecasts and flood risk maps to stakeholders and evaluating economic benefits and community responses to the early warning system. The goal is to help communities better prepare for floods through increased warning lead times.
3. Background & Problem Statement
• Despite advances in forecasting, most cases warning system fails (Parker
et al., 2009)
• Generation of long lead flood forecasts is highly challenging and
uncertain. Thus there is very limited application of it. (Fakhruddin, et.al
2012)
• A decision making process is essential in a social context where roles
and responsibilities are clearly shared for appropriate response (Morss
& Wahlb 2007)
3
The major objective of the program is to increase the lead time for flood
forecasting for agriculture risk management.
4. Early Warning Gaps
Dissemination to at-risk communities
Observation/ monitoring
Warning formulation
Community response
Data analysis
Prediction Risk assessment
Emergency response plans
Public education/ awareness
Mitigation programs
Potential impact assessment
Preparation of response options
Aging and insufficient observation and data communication facilities
Numerical prediction capability
Skilled human resource
Capacity to make use of new generation forecasts
Local level potential impact assessment not done
Integration
Language
Localized, relevant
Institutional mechanism, linkages
SOPs
Redundant communication systems
Reach to special groups
Data sharing among agencies, compatibility
Public awareness
Communication of forecast limitations
Lack of trainers/ facilitators
Resources to respond to warning
Regulatory framework for warning
Stakeholders involvement and roles
5. Vulnerability and Risk Assessment
Hydrology
Crop Crop -Season
Jan-March April-June Jul-Sep Oct-Dec
Robi (dry) Kharif -I Kharif II Robi (dry)
Crop
Aus S H
T. Aman S H
Boro
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Rainfall(mm)
WaterLevel(meter-PWD)
Water Level Rainfall
6. Project Location
Meghna Basin
82,000 sq.km
Brahmaputra Basin
552,000 sq.km
Ganges Basin
1,087,000 sq.km
B A Y O F B E N G A L
BHUTAN
I N D I A
C H I N A
BANGLADESH
I N D I A
Bangladesh rivers receive runoff from a catchment of 1.72 million sq.
km, around 12 times its land area
7. Topography of Bangladesh
• About 50% of the
country within 6-7 m of
MSL.
• About 68% of the
country vulnerable to
flood.
• 25 to 30% areas
inundated in normal
flood
9. Methodology- Hydrological Models
ECMWF
Operational
ensemble
forecast
NOAA and NASA
(i.e.CMORPH and GPCP)
satellite precipitation & GTS
rain gauge data
Hydrologic model parameters
Discharge data
Downscaling of forecasts
Statistical correction
Hydrological
Model
• Lumped
• Distributed
• Multi-Model
Discharge
Forecasting
• Accounting for
uncertainties
• Final error
correction
• Generation of
discharge
forecast PDF
• Critical level
probability
forecast
(I). Initial Data
Input
(II). Statistical
Rendering
(III). Hydrolog.
Modeling
(IV). Generation of
Probabilistic Q
(V).
Forecast
Product
10. Initial Data Input
Initial data comes from number of sources and is
used to either drive the forecasts (e.g.,ECMWF
EPS), correct the forecasts and provide
calibration of the basin discharge
Data is passed on for statistical rendering and to force the hydrological models
(Webster et al. 2011)
11. • Forecast downscaled to computation grid 0.5 x 0.5 degree
• Quantile-to-quantile mapping of downscaled forecasts at
each grid point/ forecast lead time using “Kernel approach”
Statistical Rendering: Correction of EPS
systematic error
QR (III)
(I) E (I) S
(Webster et al. 2011)
12. Vulnerability and Risk Assessment
12
Risk Scoping
Risk
Characterization
Risk Evaluation
Risk Management
Feedback
• Establish target and
criteria through
consultation with
stakeholders
• Identify possible
•Risk event
•Source of stress
•Stress receptors
•Relationship
between sources
and receptor
• Estimate for risk
event and receptor:
•Likelihood of
exposure to
stressors
•Consequences
of exposure to
stress
•Develop risk
profile
•Compare event
and total risks with
targets and criteria
•Assess existing
risk management
practices against
risk profile
•Evaluate
treatment options
•Develop strategy
based on option
(Hay, 2007)
13. Needs Assessment of EWS
Target groups Decisions Forecast lead time
requirement
Farmers Early harvesting, delayed planting, Fertilizer
management
10 days
Crop systems selection, subsequent crops Seasonal
Selling cattle, goats and poultry (extreme) Seasonal
Household Storage of dry food, safe drinking water, food grains, fire
wood
10 days
Collecting vegetables, banana 1 week
With draw money from micro-financing institutions 1 week
Fisherman Protecting fishing nets 1 week
Harvesting fresh water fish from small ponds 10 days
Civil Defense Resources mobilization, planning evacuation and boats 5-10 days
Arrangements for women and children 5- 10 days
Distribution of water purification tablets 7 days
14. Ensembles Forecasts for 1-10 Days
7-10 day Ensemble Forecasts 7-10 day Danger Levels
7 day 8 day
9 day 10 day
7 day 8 day
9 day 10 day
15. Plumes and probability pies for the first Brahmaputra flood July 28-August 6, 2007
Model able to meet three fundamental information needs of communities at risk
Forecast Validation
16.
17.
18. Forecasts Dissemination
Website
E-mail (
Nationals
stakeholders,
District and
Union
Information
Centers)
SMS ( SMS
to DDMC
members in
12 Pilot
Unions)
400 stakeholders received
flood early warning during
monsoon through SMS
120 UISCs and 100 different
stakeholders received flood
early warning through e-mail
in local language.
23. Economic- Benefits
• In 2008 Flood, Economic Benefits on
average per household at pilot areas
• Livestock's = $485 per household
• HH assets = $270 per household
• Agriculture = $180 per household
• Fisheries = $120) per households
• Experiment showed that every USD 1
invested, a return of USD 40.85 in
benefits over a ten-year period may
be realized (World Bank, 2012).
Average Amount of Saving per Household
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000
Save agriculture
Save HH assets
Save Livestock
Save Fishereis
Amount (TK.)