The document outlines an assessment plan for a training design using the 3E's model of experience, expertise, and exercise. It includes a portfolio rating scale that evaluates outputs from each phase based on understanding of materials, context, presentation, and timeliness. Experience is weighted at 50% and involves journaling issues and sample assessment tools. Expertise is weighted at 30% and involves journaling challenges addressed and assessment tool congruence. Exercise is weighted at 15% and involves minutes from assessment strategy discussions and classroom observation ratings. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 with descriptors for each rating level.

1. Table 7. 3E’s (Experience, Expertise, Exercise) Training Design Assessment Plan
PORTFOLIO RATING
(Adopted from LDM2 Form 1A-Individual Report of Rating for Teachers, National Educator’s Academy of the Philippines
Memorandum
OSEC- NEAP-OD-2021-50, Subject: LDM Practicum Portfolio Guides and Evaluation Form.)
Phases Required Output Understandin
g the
materials
Understanding
the Context
Language and
Over all
Presentation
Timeli
ness
Rating
per
output
Weight
per
output
Weigh
ted
ratin
g
Descrip
tive
Rating
EXPERIENCE 50% 30% 15% 5%
Journal Reflecting
issues and
concerns in the
present situation
of assessment
Sample Teacher-
made assessment
tools (Diagnostic,
Formative,
Summative)
EXPERTISE
Journal Reflecting
addressed
challenges
suggested by
experts
Congruence of
Teacher-made with
the Standard
Assessment tools
Crafted
Technology-aided
and Traditional
Assessment tools
related to present
situation
EXERCISE
128

2. Minutes of the LAC
Session discussing
assessment
strategies
Ratings/Observatio
n through
Classroom
Observation Tools
Descriptive Rating
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor