Dimapur-Kohima Rail Project Site Visit Report (1).docx
1. Sub.: Report on site visit of officials from Sivok-Rangpo New BG Rail Link Project to tunnel
works of Dimapur-Kohima New Rail Link Project
Ref.: IRCON/2046/NFR-SRRP/6129 dated 09.05.2023
1. Vide above reference the competent authority of IRCON sent the following five officials
from SRRP to tunnel works of Dimapur-Kohima New Rail Link Project to witness and
understand the tunnelling works in poor strata (Class VI and VII as encountering there)
and for adoption of the same in SRRP also:
i. Shri B.C. Karmakar (JGM/C-IRCON)
ii. Shri P.C. Dhang (DGM/C/Geology-IRCON)
iii. Shri C.K. Prashar (CRE/Amberg)
iv. Shri P. Baruah (Geologist/Amberg)
v. Shri A. Mannan (Geologist/D2-PEMS)
2. The officials reported to XEN/DMV-NFR and visited the site on 17.05.2023 and
18.05.2023. During which 3 nos. tunnels have been visited, namely, Tunnel T1 P1 and P2
including escape tunnel, Tunnel T4 P1 and P2 and Tunnel T10 P1 and P2 including
escape tunnel. The visited tunnels are encountering the worst ground condition in the
project where at T1 the encountering class is VI whereas at T4 and T10 the encountering
class is VII.
3. The details of observation from each tunnel during the site visit has been given in the
tables below:
Tunnel T-1
Total length 3490 m
Excavated length
of P1 and P2
P1- 1897 m and P2- 1057.5 m
Construction
company
M/s ABCI
DDC M/s Beaver Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd, Navi Mumbai
Rock Support
Classes
Entirely based on Q-system, however RMR has also been
calculated at site for cross-verification
Dimension Details Finished Radius:4005mm/ Finished Diameter:8010 mm/Finished
Height:7437mm
Present support
classes
P1- Class VI (Q-value 0.07)
P2- Class VI (Q-value 0.08)
Geological
condition (photos
in Annex. I)
P1: Alternate bands of thick (0.5 to 1.0 m) beds of sandstone and
thinner beds of laminated shale. Three prominent joint sets
(45/140, 50/310, 60/250). Heavy water ingress.
P2: Alternate bands of thick (0.5 to 1.0 m) beds of sandstone and
thinner beds of laminated shale. Three prominent joint sets
(45/155, 60/030, 60/300). Moderate water ingress.
Primary support in following sequence
Forepoling 32 mm/4 m/300 mm c/c spacing/SN
Method of
excavation
Drilling & Blasting (full face)
Excavated area 70 sq. mt.
Pull length 2.25 m
Rockbolt 25 mm/6 m Grouted SN or SDR/1 m interval
LG 109X16x25, 0.75 m spacing, 3 set in one pull
2. Wiremesh 150X150X6, double layer
Shotcrete 300 mm (M25)
Remarks 1. Invert has been closed therefore; the road condition in tunnel is
well maintained.
2. Cycle time ranges from 26-27 hrs in April’23
3. Rock Bolts are installing just after scaling, then ceiling
shotcrete and/ primary shotcrete with double layer wire mesh.
Advantage: During final lining rock bolt cutting operation is
eliminated.
Disadvantages:
a) Functional/Technical requirement of rock bolt is diluted by
installing before primary shotcrete, as it will act like soil nail or
spot-bolt.
b) Primary shotcrete will get delayed due to grouting operation
and waiting until torqueing is completed, which is 12 hours after
grouting.
Tunnel T1P1, 3490m long having parallel escape tunnel. Support class VI is applied. Method
of tunnelling is NATM. During site visit, survey for L.G. erection was in progress. There was
no electricity on tunnel face during 40 minutes stay. Muck disposal was completed and
survey for L.G. erection was in progress, no face sealing observed, heavy water seepage
observed on tunnel face, no face drainage holes observed, SN forepolling was installed. In
Tunnel last three/four rounds from tunnel face irregular tunnel shape observed. Tunnel
excavation being carried out with drill and blast method in full face. Pull length is fixed for
2.25m. Three set of L.G. installed in one pull of 2.25m at spacing of 0.75m. L.G. spacing can
be increased 1m to 1.25m. Rock Bolts installation is at excavated periphery as per GFC
Drawings. Main tunnel execution completed without TRNs. TRNs still pending in executed
1897m length. Ventilation and housekeeping observed ok. Tunnel road is well maintained.
Tunnel grade is upward. Dewatering is by gravity from middle of tunnel through casted
tunnel invert, no side drains inside tunnel, parallel traffic movement is easy which causes
lesser time in muck disposal. Execution of work is going on round the clock without
losing lunch time and shift change is on running tunnel face. Photos of Tunnel T1P1
attached below.
Photo: Tunnel T1P1
4. Photo: No face drainage holes/Installed forepolling
Photo: Irregular TRN Profile where ISMB RIB were in progress.
Tunnel T-4
Total length 1168 m
Excavated length of
P1 and P2
P1- 678.5 m and P2- 49.5 m
Construction
company
M/s BIPL
DDC M/s Beaver Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd (Design), M/s Progressive
Machine Tools (PMT) (Supervision)
Rock Support
Classes
Based on RMR and cross-verification by Q-value
Present support P1- Class VII (Q-value 0.0091, RMR 18)
5. classes P2- Class VII (Q-value 0.0031, RMR 16)
Geological condition
(photos in Annex. I)
P1: Dominantly laminated shale with subordinate thin beds of
sandstone. Three prominent joint sets (38/098, 65/152, 73/305).
Slightly damp ground.
P2: Thinly laminated shale, highly weathered. Three prominent joint
sets (43/050, 65/205, 72/103). Damp ground.
Primary support in following sequence
Forepoling 32 mm/4 m/200 mm c/c spacing/SN
Excavation method Mechanical breaking (Heading-Benching-Invert)/Drilling blasting
Excavated area 69.64 sq. mt.
Pull length P1: 2.25-3 m
P2: 1 m
Rockbolt NA
Ribs ISMB 250X125 @ 0.75 m spacing, 3 set in one pull
Lagging MS plate 6 mm (or slabs 730X200X50
Backfilling M20
Primary lining
thickness
450 mm
Remarks 1. Support is Rigid and Conventional
2. Cycle time 20-22 hrs avg.
3. Lesser activities in each cycle:
(a) Face excavation for heading,(With Blasting operation)
(b) Scaling and mucking,
(c) Face sealing,
(d) Surveying and placement of steel support,
(e) Erection of ISMB, (f) Backfilling,
(g) Anchor drilling and fixing with SN type, no SDA rockbolt, hence,
time savings for grouting and torqueing etc, however, for such worst
rock class, where, hole collapse situation, design permitted for SN
Rock Bolt anchoring of RIB with Plate.
(f) Out of alternate 3 RIB spacing @0.75 mtr for one RIB spacing
3.14mm MS plate is at Tunnel Side of RIB (Inner) and for 3 RIB space
plates are welded with RIB outer side, thus less concrete back filling,
Remaining 3 round space backfilling will be done along with final
lining, thus less time for round length.
Tunnel T4P1, 1168m long. Method of Tunnelling is conventional. Support class VII is applied.
Side slope in front of portal are damaged. During site visit backfilling concrete for benching was
in progress. Tunnel face in dry condition hence no water seepage observed in executed tunnel,
no drainage holes was drilled. Tunnel excavation carried out by mechanical/Drill and blast
method in Heading/Benching and Invert. Excavated benching face, some blasting drilled holes
sockets observed. Tunnel face muck is being used for maintenance of tunnel road. SN type
forepolling is in use. Heading pull length is fixed for 2.25m. Three set of Ribs 150 X 250mm
ISMB were installed in one pull at spacing of 0.75m. Maximum achieved monthly progress 40m.
Ribs spacing can be increased 1m to 1.25m. Out of alternate 3 RIB spacing @0.75 m for one
RIB spacing 3.14mm MS plate shuttering is at Tunnel Side of RIB Inner flange and for 3 RIB
space plates are welded with RIB outer flange, thus less concrete back filling, Remaining 3
round space backfilling will be done along with final lining, thus less time for round length.
Ventilation and housekeeping is ok. Tunnel road is well maintained. Main tunnel execution
completed without TRNs. TRNs still pending in executed 679m length. Methane gas is
encountered in tunnel; additional ventilation fan is located inside tunnel to dilute encountered
6. methane gas. Execution of work is going on round the clock without losing lunch time
and shift change is on running tunnel face. Photos of Tunnel T4P1 attached below.
Photo: Damaged side slopes/No rock bolts
7. Photo: Damaged side slopes/No rock bolts
Photo: Tunnel T4P1/Good road condition inside tunnel
9. Photo: Shuttering at Inner and Outer flange of Ribs
Photo: Installed SN forepolling
10. Photo: Tunnel muck is used for road maintenance
Photo: Sockets of drilled blasting holes at benching face
11. Photo: Excavated benching face
Tunnel T4P2, Method of Tunnelling is conventional. Support class VII is applied. Side slope in
front of portal are damaged. During site visit no activity at tunnel face. Tunnel work is stopped
for maintenance of approach road of tunnel to work in rainy season. Tunnel face in dry
condition hence no water seepage observed in executed tunnel, no drainage holes was drilled.
Tunnel excavation carried out by mechanical method in Heading/Benching and Invert. One set
of Ribs 250mm ISMB are installed in one pull at spacing of 1.00m. Maximum achieved
monthly progress 12m. Out of alternate 3 RIB spacing @0.75 m for one RIB spacing 3.14mm
MS plate shuttering is at Tunnel Side of RIB Inner flange and for 3 RIB space plates are
welded with RIB outer flange, thus less concrete back filling, Remaining 2 round space
backfilling will be done along with final lining, thus less time for round length. Housekeeping is
ok. Tunnel road is well maintained. Execution of work is going on round the clock without
losing lunch time and shift change is on running tunnel face. Photos of Tunnel T1P2
attached below.
12. Photo: Tunnel T4 Portal 2
Photo: Damaged side slopes/No rock bolts
13. Photo: Damaged side slopes/No rock bolts
Photo: Tunnel Heading face/Dry conditions
14. Photo: Shuttering on Inner and Outer flange of Rib
Tunnel T-10
Total length 5889 m
Excavated length of P1 and P2 P1- just started and P2- 97 m
Construction company M/s ABCI
PMC M/s AECOM
Rock Support Classes Based on Q-system
Present support classes P2- Class VII (Q-value 0.005) or portal class
Geological condition (photos in
Annex. I)
P2: Thinly laminated shale, highly weathered. Four
prominent joint sets (25/080, 60/025, 75/315, 45/170).
Damp ground.
Primary support in following sequence
Piperoofing 114 mm/12 m/300 mm c/c spacing
Excavation method Mechanical breaking (Heading-Benching-Invert)
Excavated area
Pull length P2: 0.8 to 1.6 m
Ribs ISMB 250X125 @ 0.80 m spacing, 1 or 2 set in one pull
Shotcrete 300 mm
Wiremesh Double layer
Rockbolt Only on walls 4 nos./ 8 nos. in benching
Remarks 1. Support is by NATM
2. Cycle time 16 hours for heading
3. 114 mm pipe roofing incl. grouting in about 30 hrs
15. Advantages:
a) With the 114 mm pipe roofing, crown damage is
being eliminated from water jet impact during 76mm
SDA pipe roof operation.
b) Rock Bolting at crown pipe roofing area is avoided
being it is difficult and damage of pipe roof, uncertainty
of vacant space for insertion of rock bolt, thus cost &
time savings for rock bolting operation.
c) For 12 m Pipe Roofing continuous 9 m progress can
be achieved for each 12 m round of pipe roofing.
4. Rock Bolts are installing just 1st
layer of shotcrete
and then double 2nd
layer wiremesh with shotcrete.
Advantage: During final lining rock bolt cutting
operation is eliminated.
Disadvantages:
Due to grouting operation and waiting until torquing is
completed, which is 12 hours after grouting 2nd
layer
shotcrete will get delayed..
Tunnel T10P2, 5889m with parallel Escape tunnel. Method of Tunnelling is NATM. Support class
VII (Q-system) is applied. Tunnel 10 Portal 2 execution work was started in December 2022, 92
m tunnel execution done till date. During site visit face sealing shotcrete to start at tunnel face.
Tunnel face in partial damp condition. Tunnel excavation carried out by mechanical method in
Heading/Benching and Invert. Pull length is fixed for 0.8m to 1.6m as per site conditions.
One/Two set of Ribs 150 x 250mm ISMB are installed in one pull at spacing of 0.80m. Maximum
achieved monthly progress 25m. No Bi-reflex 3D monitoring targets installed in around 29m of
executed heading. Housekeeping is ok. Tunnel road is well maintained. Pipe roofing umbrella of
114mm seamless pipes 45 numbers 12m long with grouting were installed in 32/33 hours by
operating in both booms of boomer. Rock bolts are installed after first layer of shortcrete.
Execution of work is going on round the clock without losing lunch time and shift change is on
running tunnel face. Photos of Tunnel T10P2 attached below.
18. Photo: No 3D monitoring targets installed
4. The rock support classes of Dimapur-Kohima Rail Link Project are different from that of SRRP. In
SRRP also the Q-system and RMR have been adopted, however, they are further modified as per
the ground condition and their behaviour in Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya. Whereas, in DKP, the
standard classification system of Barton’s Q-value has been adopted by designer of T1 and T4,
i.e., M/s Beaver. Even the supporting elements in each rock support class of Beaver for T1 and
T4 are based on Barton’s system with slight modifications. Though the Q-value system has been
adopted by M/s AECOM at T10 of DKP, but again further sub-classification has been done in
between. And the supporting elements of each rock support class of AECOM for T10 are based
on NATM and not on Barton’s Q-system. The detail comparison of each approach of rock support
classification has been given below.
19. Standard Rock Mass
Classification
SRRP DKP
D2-PEMS (T1-T2) D2-PEMS (T9-T10) AECOM (T3-T6)
AMBERG (T7-T8 &
T11-T14)
BEAVER (T1) BEAVER (T4) AECOM (T10)
RMR
(Beniawski)
Q-value (Barton) RMR
Rock
Support
Classes
(Types)
RMR/GSI
(GSI=RMR'-
5)
Rock
Support
Classes
(Types)
RMR
Rock
Support
Classes
Q-value
Rock
Support
Classes
Q-value
Rock
Support
Classes
RMR
Rock
Support
Classes
Q-value Rock
Support
Classes
0-20
Very
poor
0.001-
0.01
Exceptionally
poor
<20 6 GSI 20-25 6 <20 G
0.001-
0.01
VI 0.001-
0.01
VII
<20 VII
0.001-0.01 VII
0.01-0.1
Extremely
poor
0.01-0.1 V 0.01-0.1 VI
0.01-0.05 VI-B
0.05-0.1 VI-A
21-40 Poor 0.1-1.0 Very poor 21-40 5 GSI 25-35 5
21-30 F
0.1-1.0 IV 0.1-1.0 V
0.1-0.5 V-B
31-40 E 0.5-1.0 V-A
41-60 Fair 1.0-4.0 Poor
41-50 4 GSI 35-40 4 41-50 D
1.0-4.0 III
1.0-4.0 IV
51-60 3 GSI 40-45 3 51-60 C
61-80 Good
4.0-10.0 Fair
61-80 2 _ 2
61-75 B 4.0-10.0 II
10.0-40.0 Good >75 A >10 I
81-
100
Very
good
40.0-
100.0
Very good
81-100 1 _ 1 _ _ _ _
100.0-
400.0
Extremely
good
>400.0
Exceptionally
good