Exploring Gemini AI and Integration with MuleSoft | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #45
Student Engagement via Pedagogies for the Digital Age
1. Student Engagement
via Pedagogies
for the Digital Age
Zoraini Wati Abas, EdD
President
Association for Instructional Design Advance/
Associate Research Visiting Fellow
National Higher Education Research Institute - USM
20. Learning &Teaching
• Teacher-Centered Learning
– Didactic Instruction (Passive)
• Students take notes/given
notes
• Every student given the
same learning experience –
content & activities
• Student-Centered Learning
– Authentic
– Enthusiasm/Experiential
– Innovative
– Outcome-Based
– Ubiquitous
– Blended
– Flipped
– Collaborative
– Personalized
9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
20
BEFORE (Easier) NOW (More Challenging)
21. STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
Part 2 (What, Why, How)
9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
21
22. Student
Engagement
• Providing a learning-centered
approach (Hunt & Chalmers,
2012)
• The facilitator needs to
provide effective facilitation
of learning through new or
innovative ways.
• Social constructivist
approach works best –
collaboration between
learners in a learning
environment. Use of Web
2.0 tools
What does it mean?
9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
22
23. Student
Engagement
• Beer, Clark & Jones (2010).
Student engagement is linked
to undergraduate academic
achievement, student
attribution, student
retention, student motivation
and institutional success.
• Trowler (2010), “when
learners are engaged…they
are shaping and leading their
own learning and education.”
Why is it important?
9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
23
24. Student
Engagement
• Kuh (2003). “Student
engagement holds the
magic wand making it
possible for students to
succeed and develop their
potential.”
• Duffy, Korkmas, Dennis, et
al (2005), “students who
are more engaged learn
more”
Why is it important?
9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
24
25. Student
Engagement
• Ruey (2010), “when
learners feel involved and
engaged in the course, they
perform well and the
desired learning objectives
are achieved.
• Coates (2005), “student
engagement is directly or
indirectly related to
improvement in student
learning.”
Why is it important?
9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
25
26. Student Engagement
contributes to:
Student Success
Student Development
Student Satisfaction
Student Persistence
Academic Achievement &
Social Engagement
(Astin, 1984, 1993; Berger and Milem, 1999; Chickering and Gamson, 1987;
Goodsell, Maher and Tinto, 1992; Kuh, 1995; Kuh et al., 2005; Kuh and Vesper,
1997; Pace, 1995; Pascarella and Terenzini, 1991, 2005).
9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
26
38. 9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
38
http://www.coetail.com/vzimmer/files/2013/02/iPadagogy-Wheel.001.jpg
39. 9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
39
Source:http://c4lpt.co.uk/top100tools/top100-edu/
40. 9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
40
http://www.pinterest.com/zoraini
41. The ultimate engagement is to:
1. Put the learner in charge of
learning.
2. Create a rich learning environment
3. Motivate students to learn where
the students do all the hard work of
learning while the teacher merely
facilitates.
Source:https://www.edutopia.org/blog/student-engagement-definition-ben-
johnson
9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
41
42. GOOD INSTRUCTION (LEARNING) –
APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES
Part 3
9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
42
43. Evolution in Educational Technology
9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
43
Film
(1940s)
Televisi
on
(1950s)
Programm
ed
Instruction
(1960s)
Systemati
c
Instructio
nal
Design
(1970s)
Compute
rs
(1980s)
The
Interne
t
(1990s)
Social
Networ
ks and
Web
2.0
(2000s)
Smart
Phones
(2003 -
) &
Tablets
(2010 -
)
IoT/Nex
t Gen
LMS
45. 9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
45
http://www.studentengagementtrust.org/engagementModel/images/set_veen_diagram.
png
Classroom Interaction Model
of Student Engagement
46. Type of
Interaction
Description of Interactions Online Platforms/Social
Media Tools
Student-
Instructor
Include required forms of communication (e.g.,
timely responses to email inquiries, assignment
feedback), but also leveraging educational
technology so that your teaching strengths
shine.
VoiceThread, videos, Voki,
audio feedback, Screen-cast-
o-matic
Student-
Student
Build activities and assignments that ignite
classroom discussion. Discussion threads
• Group projects
• Peer reviews
• Study groups (developed based on
observed, organic interaction among
students)
• Video chat sessions (e.g., for discussing
readings or discussion prompts)
Twitter, Instagram, XMind,
Google Drive, VoiceThread,
Mural.ly, Snapguide, wikis
Student-
Content
Assignments, activities, goals, and assessments
that reinforce active learning—through which
students actively assimilate rather than
passively absorb learning material.
Thinglink, Animoto, Dipity,
Cacoo, Flashcard Exchange,
Prezi, blogs, Pinterest
Adapted from http://facultyecommons.com/three-types-of-interaction-that-foster-student-engagement/9-11 August 2017
THESA 2017: Life-Long . Life-Wide . Life-
Deep
46