This document discusses human capital perspective and valuation approaches. It defines human capital as the knowledge and skills individuals acquire. There are three types of capital: customer, structural, and human. Human capital refers to employee expertise. Valuing human capital is important for management. Approaches include cost and economic models like present value, reward valuation, net benefit, and certainty equivalent net benefit models. These approaches discount future earnings to calculate current value but have limitations. Companies like Infosys use models like Lev and Schwartz to value human resources in financial reports. In conclusion, accurately valuing human capital is beneficial for management decisions.
1. Human Capital Perspective Presented By: Group D2 Ajay Kumar Verma Anusha John Ruchi Gupta Sagar Saxena Sumit Agarwala
2. Flow of Presentation Introduction Capital Redefined Why is Human Capital Key? Valuation of Human Capital Human Resource Accounting Why valuation of Human Resource Essential? Approaches for valuation - Present Value Model - Reward Valuation Model - Net Benefit Model - Certainty Equivalent Net Benefit Model Conclusion
3. Introduction Human Capital is defined as âthe knowledge that individuals acquire during their life and use to produce goods services or ideas in market or non-market circumstancesâ. It is the embodiment of productive capacity within people. It is the sum of peopleâs skills, knowledge, attributes, motivations, and fortitude. Human capital cannot be owned or transferred.
4.
5. Why is Human Capital Key? New economy is often called the knowledge economy Valuation of Microsoft > GM + Ford + Boeing + Lockheed-Martin + Deere + Caterpillar + USX + Weyerhauser + Union Pacific + Kodak + Sears + Marriott + Safeway + Kellogg. Yet, the only value at Microsoft resides in the heads of its employees!
6. Valuation of Human Capital âWhat gets measured gets managed.â This suggests then that the fundamental source of wealth creationâhuman capitalâis seriously under managed in most organizations. Expenditures associated with the development of people such as education and training are treated as costs though these expenditures possess the attributes of an investment
7. Human Resource Accounting The process of identifying and measuring data about human resources and communicating this information to interested parties Flamholtz (1971) define HRA as âthe measurement and reporting of the cost and value of people in organizational resourcesâ.
8. Why valuation of Human Resource is essential? Increases managerial awareness of the value of human resource. Facilitates logical computation of return on capital employed. The maintenance of detailed records relating to the human resources improves managerial decision making. Increases productivity of human resources. Helps potential investors and other users in making long-term investment decisions
9.
10.
11. Total earnings which each group will get up to retirement are calculated and discounted at the rate of cost of capital. The value thus arrived will be value of HR as an asset
12. Present Value Model Vr= value of an individual r year old I(t)= The individualâs average earnings up to retirement t= Retirement age r= Present age of employee R= discount rate specific to cost of capital of the company
13. Limitations It ignores personâs inherent qualities, traits and skills while calculating human resource value This model considers role of an employee stable and of unchanging nature It fails to correctly evaluate the team work involved It ignores reasons other than death or retirement due to which a person may leave the job
16. Estimating the value derived by the organization when a person occupies a particular position for a specific time period
17. Estimating the probable period for which the person will occupy each possible service status in future
18.
19.
20. The value of direct and indirect future payments to the employee is determined
21. The excess of value of the future services (as per step 1) over the value of future payments (as per step 2) is calculated. This gives net benefit to the enterprise
24. The net benefit from all the employees multiplied by their certainty-equivalent net benefits.Limitation : Computational difficulty
25. HRA in INFOSYS The HRA Method used is Lev And Schwartz Accounting Model The software deliver staffs are valued at Rs.26,550 crores while those in the support function are valued at Rs.1,784 crores. Infosys had to take the following assumptions: employee compensation, incremental earnings based on group and age. The FY 2005 annual report on HRA of Infosys mentioned the dichotomy in accounting between human and no-human capital is fundamental.
26. Conclusion Human capital is the sum of peopleâs skills, knowledge, attributes, motivations, and fortitude. BHEL pioneered in human resource valuation using Lev and Schwartz model. The other companies like Infosys, BPCL etc have followed the suite.
27. References Human Capital Accounting: Should Employees be Classified as Assets? , By Ezewuchi F. Amaefule Valuation of Human Capital, By NavinBhutoria http://thepublicistsassistant.com/jobs-and-careers/human-resource-accounting-hra-practices-in-india/ http://www.infosys.com/hcm/pages/index.aspx
Editor's Notes
Broadly a company's strength arises out of its customer base which purchases its products. This customer capital triggers a number of key decisions such as new product and service packages, new designs in anticipation of customer preferences and new locations from which a number of customers could be profitably served. Besides customers, the strength of an organization arises out of the efficiency of its operations. This is characterized by the manner in which its processes are designed and operated. We can call this the structural capital. But the key strength comes out of its human capital. It is the expertise of its employees which ensures that customers are acquired and retained, and the processes work efficiently to satisfy the customer's needs. We can say that human capital is the basis for the creation of customer and structural capital.
The new economy is often called the knowledge economy. Emerging from an industrial age, this new economy distinguishes itself by a large amount of the value of the company residing in the head of the employee instead of in the tangible assets of the company. This realization was made very clear in a 1999 Business Week article that showed the valuation of Microsoft was superior to GM + Ford + Boeing + Lockheed-Martin + Deere + Caterpillar + USX + Weyerhauser + Union Pacific + Kodak + Sears + Marriott + Safeway + Kellogg. Yet, the only value at Microsoft resides in the heads of its employees!
It increases managerial awareness of the value of the human resources. It discloses what is happening with the energy of the human beings and what its value for management is.It facilitates logical computation of return on capital employed. Here, the volume of capital employed is determined on the basis of sum total of both types of assets- physical as well as human.The maintenance of detailed records relating to the human resources improves managerial decision making; specially institutions like direct recruitment v/s promotions, transfers v/s retention, utility of cost reduction program in view of its possible impact on human relations an impact of budgetary control on human relations and organizational behavior. In this way, HRM will improve efficiency of management.The system of HRA pave the way for increasing the productivity of human resources, because the fact that monetary value is attached to human resources and that human talent, devotion and skills are considered as valuable assets and allocated a place in financial statement of the organizational., would boost the morale, loyalty and initiative of the employees, creating in their mind a sense of belongingness towards the organization. It would act as a great incentive, leading to increased productivity.It helps potential investors and other users in making long-term investment decisions.The success of an organization depends on on the build up of quality workforce at all the levels. Example: BHEL, Infosys, SAIL, ITC etc.
Vr= Summation from t=r to t (I(t)/(1+R)^t-r))WhereVr= value of an individual r year oldI(t)= The individualâs average earnings up to retirement t= Retirement ager= Present age of employeeR= discount rate specific to cost of capital of the companyExample, Avg age of employee group =55 years, Annual earnings till retirement = 1,00,000 , age of retirement= 60, cost of capital = 10% and no. of employees = 10 then value = 3,78, 900BHEL pioneered in human resource valuation using Lev and Schwartz model.Example: Average age of employee group =55 years Annual earnings till retirement = Rs. 1,00,000 Age of retirement= 60 Cost of capital = 10% No. of employees = 10 Value of Human Resource = Rs. 37,89, 000
This model computes the value of the human resource earnings of employee which give rise to two problems:For employees who work in organizations which pay higher salaries to their employees, the value of human resource becomes higher than those organizations that pay comparatively lower salaries to their employees.On the basis of this valuation, the comparison made between the human resource of different organizations does not give any clear results because it compares human resource on the basis of their salary and not the basis of their real potential.2. A personâs value to an organization is not entirely determined by the salary paid to him. A person may like to work at a salary which is less than what he actually deserves. Moreover, salary does not remain constant over a period of time.3. It ignores personâs inherent qualities, traits and skills while calculating human resource value, which are valauable in achieving organizational goals.4. It ignores reasons other than death or retirement due to which a person may leave the job. Thus it overstates an employeesâ expected service life and his future earnings5. This model considers role of an employee stable and of unchanging nature but employees are quite often transferred to other departments, get promotions etc.6. It fails to correctly evaluate the team work involved. It does not consider the contributions of the team as a whole.7. Factors responsible for higher earning potentiality of the employee like sensitivity, bargaining, skills, expertise, experience etc which may cause differentiation in the salary structure is ignored