This document poses a series of open-ended questions about the relationship between science, art, perception, and truth. It questions how our perceptions are shaped by our tools and fields of study, the role of intention and audience in creative work, and whether there is an expiration date on what is considered true. The questions also explore the similarities and differences between the crafts of art and science, and how our environment and external forces can influence creativity.

1. what if it was true after all?

2. When discussing nano does understanding
falter because it's smaller than I can represent
with my own body?

3. what is the purpose of the experiment?

4. How are artists and scientists bound by givens
in their perception of the world?

5. what is the relationship between
perception and belief?

6. what is the role of intention?

7. can babies do science?

8. is there a personal language of science?

9. do we have a certain perception
conventions within particular fields?

10. what makes an outcome an outcome?

11. how can something that is so wrong be so right?

12. does science need to start with the
knowledge of many?

13. there is a wider audience for the outcomes
of what can be made from science but do
scientists have an audience other than
themselves to enable them to think and
deduct?

14. are there parallels between the craft skills
of art and those of science?

15. how do the clothes we work in support thinking?

16. everything we see may not be there or at
least not as we think it is - where is our
starting point?

17. is there a shelf-life on what is true?

18. what is the role of ‘external forces’ on
creativity?

19. what makes something meaningful?

20. what should i work on next?

21. question needed here