This 90 minute session will feature a 45 minute mini-demo lesson from a CLIL course on English Literature. The session will focus on the works of Sylvia Plath; examining her relationship to her own father and also her husband, Ted Hughes, through analysing her poem “Daddy”. Before and after the mini-demo lesson the speaker will situate the lesson in the context of the course, and explain how syllabus, materials and assessments would work together to ensure the lesson satisfies the “dual aims” of the CLIL approach (language and content). Samples of students’ work will also be shown in order to demonstrate how CLIL works in Practice, with a special focus on assessment and interaction. This is a very hands-on and practical session using real-life examples from a practicing teacher. There will also be time for questions and discussion at the end.
: CLIL in Practice: Syllabus, Materials, Assessment and Interaction through English Literature
1. CLIL IN PRACTICE: SYLLABUS,
MATERIALS, ASSESSMENT AND
INTERACTION THROUGH ENGLISH
LITERATURE
Richard Pinner
Sophia University
richardpinner@live.com
uniliterate.com
CLILJapan.org
15. Her Father was German
Her Father was a Nazi
Her Father was a Teacher
He died when she was 10 years old
She killed him
She thought her husband was like her father
16.
17.
18. I was ten when they buried you.
At twenty I tried to die
And get back, back, back to you.
I thought even the bones would do.
19.
20.
21.
22. Analysis
• Count the number of syllables in each line
• How many stanzas are there?
• Does the poem rhyme? Use colours to
highlight the rhyming scheme.
• Is this poem regular or irregular?
分
析
23. Analysis
(1) Plath’s husband, Ted Hughes
(2) Otto Plath’s job
(3) Otto Plath’s nationality and language
(4) A children’s nursery rhyme
(5) The Holocaust and Concentration camps
(6) Hitler
(7) Traditional folklore
分
析
24. Reaction
• Do you like the poem? Why/why not?
• Is the poem beautiful? Why/why not?
• What do you think the poem is about? Is there
a narrative or story?
• What kind of relationship do you think she
had with her father?
25. Criticism
• What background information do we need to
know in order to begin trying to understand
this poem?
• Author’s personal background
• Historical background
• Cultural background
27. For Next lesson
• Have a look on the Moodle
• Read through the two Crow poem on the
handout
• If you have any questions email
richardpinner@live.com
28.
29.
30. For Next lesson
• Answer the questions on the Moodle Coffee
Room Discussion Forum
• Download and read the handout on Ted
Hughes for next lesson
• If you have any questions email
richardpinner@live.com
35. Authenticity
Pinner, R. S. (2014). The authenticity
continuum: Towards a definition
incorporating international voices.
English Today, 30(4), 22-27.
Pinner, R. S. (2016). Reconceptualising
Authenticity for English as a
Global Language. Bristol:
Multilingual Matters.
36. Do you think literature uses authentic
language? (n=88)
Yes
50%
No
42%
Other
8%
Yes 44 50%
No 37 42%
Other 7 8%
40. Advantages
Published. Share. Keep.
Work has a real audience
Engage with ‘alien’ Academic Journals by producing their
own.
Students work harder and produce better work
41. Writing Skills (Rina)
Total Word Count: 1000
Total Unique Words: 342
Number of Sentences: 52
Average Sentence Length: 19.23
Number of Paragraphs: 1
Hard Words: 57 (5.70%)
Lexical Density: 34.20%
Fog Index: 9.97
42. Integrated Skills (Rina)
Total Word Count: 1342
Total Unique Words: 469
Number of Sentences: 93
Average Sentence Length: 14.43
Number of Paragraphs: 1
Hard Words: 80 (5.96%)
Lexical Density: 34.95%
Fog Index: 8.16
43. Students’ Reactions
[Contributing to the journal] didn't really make
me feel different when writing the essay
because I was rushing and had to think about
other finals. But once It's done it's great to look
at it as an achievement and also to look at what
the others have done. And I also went through
the last years' class journal to give me some
ideas (Yuko).
“
”
44. Students’ Reactions
I thought that I would elaborate my report
because all Integrated Skills members can see it.
If we know that other students can see our
report, some students try to make a neater one.
At least, I’m sure that I did my best. (cont…)
“
45. Students’ Reactions
I think that Class Journal is very good because we
can share our opinions and thoughts. When I wrote
my report, Class Journal of the previous class was
very helpful to the writing style and I enjoyed their
reports. For me, the best point of Class Journal is
that all class members’ works are combined into
one big work. This is a sign that we shared lessons
and opinions. I have a sense of achievement in
Integrated Skills because my work remains as a part
of Class Journal. So I’m very happy to contribute to
Class Journal (Kazuya)
“
”
46. Students’ Reactions
When I was told to put my essay on the class
journal, I was really nervous. I did not have
confidence to write an essay that is good
enough to be looked by everyone. I carefully
think about how my classmates can be
interested in my essay. I especially devised my
topic that would attract them (Mahoka).
“
”
47. Students’ Reactions
I think publishing class journal is a really good
idea. When I heard, I was surprised and felt
pressure honestly. Though, if it is published, I
can see my essay whenever I want and remind
my efforts. This give me a confidence when I
write paper in the future. Adding to that, I can
see my friends' essays and learn which books
they read or I should read (Chiaki)
“
”
49. In conclusion I was able to…
• make assessments part of the (enjoyable)
learning process
• motivate (trick) the students into working
harder
• produce a useful learning aid for future classes
• get students to engage with a world which is
otherwise rather abstract for them
50. Summary
• You can download the slides and additional
resources at
www.uniliterate.com
• Please email me!
rpinner@sophia.ac.jp
• Please also checkout
www.cliljapan.org
Title: CLIL in Practice: Syllabus, Materials, Assessment and Interaction through English Literature
Abstract: This 90 minute session will feature a 45 minute mini-demo lesson from a CLIL course on English Literature. The session will focus on the works of Sylvia Plath; examining her relationship to her own father and also her husband, Ted Hughes, through analysing her poem “Daddy”. Before and after the mini-demo lesson the speaker will situate the lesson in the context of the course, and explain how syllabus, materials and assessments would work together to ensure the lesson satisfies the “dual aims” of the CLIL approach (language and content). Samples of students’ work will also be shown in order to demonstrate how CLIL works in Practice, with a special focus on assessment and interaction. This is a very hands-on and practical session using real-life examples from a practicing teacher. There will also be time for questions and discussion at the end.
Born 1932
Died 1963
Nationality American – Born Boston
Famous books – Bell Jar, Ariel,
Married to – Ted Hughes, poet Laureate (1984 – 1998)
How did she die – suicide (many blame Hughes)
Not as good trailer?
DADDY VIDEO
Is there a story to the poem? Can we learn about her own life by reading? Do we need to know more about her and history to be able to understand it?
Set groups to read each of the pieces of criticism. Have them then report back to each other, explaining any difficult ideas. Group summary.
分析します = BunSEKI (analyse)
分析します = BunSEKI (analyse)
Love and hate
陰陽 = Onmyō
Plus qs for each reading…. Make one file with all stuff for 2 classes so I can flit between. Flexiprez
Authenticity (according to Greek etymological roots and Existentialist thinkers) is being true to yourself
Students were not told this in the study
Other – people left blank or wrote “mostly”
A way to encourage them to engage with Alien academic journal content by producing their own.
Published
http://issuu.com/richardpinner/docs/2013a_integratedjournal_f7548bc73ae3ca/12
Rina = Rei I
http://www.usingenglish.com/resources/text-statistics.php
Hard Words
Hard words are defined as words with three or more syllables. This definition is used in calculating the readability and difficulty of a text, including the Gunning Fog Index
The Lexical Density Test is a Readability Test designed to show how easy or difficult a text is to read. The Lexical Density Test uses the following formula:Lexical Density = (Number of different words / Total number of words) x 100
The lexical density of a text tries to measure the proportion of the content (lexical) words over the total words. Texts with a lower density are more easily understood.
As a guide, lexically dense text has a lexical density of around 60-70% and those which are not dense have a lower lexical density measure of around 40-50%.
See Also: Passive Index; Fog Index; Flesch-Kincaid Index; Word; Concordancer
The Fog Index is a readability test designed to show how easy or difficult a text is to read. It uses the following formula:Reading Level (Grade) = (Average No. of words in sentences + Percentage of words of three or more syllables) x 0.4
The resulting number is your Gunning Fog Index.
The Gunning Fog Index gives the number of years of education that your reader hypothetically needs to understand the paragraph or text. The Gunning Fog Index formula implies that short sentences written in plain English achieve a better score than long sentences written in complicated language.
For reference, the New York Times has an average Fog Index of 11-12, Time magazine about 11. Typically, technical documentation has a Fog Index between 10 and 15, and professional prose almost never exceeds 18.
Yuko = Yuka
Kazuya= Kazumi
Chiaki = Chiyori
This fits with dynamic views of motivation (D and Ush 2011)