• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Climate and efficiency gains in dairy systems pilot project
 

Climate and efficiency gains in dairy systems pilot project

on

  • 576 views

Presentation builds onto National Discussions on Priority Adaptation and Mitigation Actions for Agriculture in the National Climate Change Action Plan 2013-2017 ...

Presentation builds onto National Discussions on Priority Adaptation and Mitigation Actions for Agriculture in the National Climate Change Action Plan 2013-2017

More information: http://ccafs.cgiar.org/national-adaptation-planning-event-agriculture#.UhcfJD-LKdk

Statistics

Views

Total Views
576
Views on SlideShare
572
Embed Views
4

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
10
Comments
0

1 Embed 4

https://twitter.com 4

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Climate and efficiency gains in dairy systems pilot project Climate and efficiency gains in dairy systems pilot project Presentation Transcript

    • CLIMATE AND EFFICIENCY GAINS IN DAIRY SYSTEMS: PILOT PROJECT BY LUKE KESSEI /ROBIN MBAE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION
    • INTRODUCTION • The agriculture sector, including livestock, is highly vulnerable to climate change • The sector is responsible for about 30 per cent of Kenya’s GHG emissions as in 2010 • 90 per cent of these emissions are generated by the livestock sub-sector. NCCAP, MARCH 2013
    • Total reference case emission from agriculture (MtCO2e)
    • Table 1: Reference case emissions from agriculture (MtCO2e)
    • Carbon and nitrogen flows on livestock farms e Feeding strategy and additives Livestock Landscape design Soils Agro ecology Manure Manure treatment Feed Export in meat/milk Emissions (CH4,NH3,N03,N20) Treatment (bioenery, composting) Emissions (CO2, NH3, NO3, NO2) Fertiliser (CO2, N2O) Import (CO2,N2O) Emissions (CH4) Gerber, P. et al.
    • Current position of Dairy sub-sector • Kenya has an estimated herd of 3.5 million improved dairy animals • National milk output has risen progressively from 2.8 billion litres in 2002 to 5.2 billion in 2011. • Contributes approximately 4% of Kenya’s GDP. • Source of income and employment to over 1.8 million smallholder dairy farmers. • Additionally creates upto 500,000 direct jobs along the value chain and a further 750,000 in related support services. • Cattle account for 88% of the milk produced while camel and goat account for the rest • The country also has the highest per capita consumption of milk in the African continent (120 lts/person/annum)
    • PURPOSE OF PROJECT • To increase dairy productivity which leads to reduction in GHGE intensity • Generation of carbon credit that will be linked to carbon trade mechanism.
    • OBJECTIVE • To enhance farmers income and food security • To develop a pilot project and methodology that can inform the development of a dairy industry NAMA in Kenya • To provide technical support for the development of technologies that link productivity gains to verifiable emission reductions in smallholder dairy production systems.
    • PROJECT CONCEPT • High-yielding animals producing more milk per lactation generally exhibit lower emission intensities. • Reasons:  Emissions are spread over more units of milk. Productivity gains are often achieved through the improved practices (Feeds, Genetics) Productivity gains reduces standing biomass per unit of milk produced.
    • RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRODUCTIVITY & EMISSION INTENSITY OF MILK
    • PROJECT COVERAGE • The pilot Project being undertaken in 3 Counties: Nandi North Uasin Gishu Elgeyo Marakwet
    • ACHIEVEMENTS • Stakeholders identified and sensitized • Project site screening & identification done • Technical working group constituted • Baseline study undertaken • Methodology development on - going
    • EXPECTED OUTPUT/OUTCOMES • Stakeholders identified and sensitized • Baseline report • Methodology development • Carbon accounting system developed & in use • Technology transfer
    • CHALLENGES • Limited knowledge on Carbon accounting system • Lack of records at farmer level for use in development of methodology in carbon emission accounting • Inadequate financial support to subsidize required inputs • The concept has a long term oriented result hence requires patience
    • WAY FORWARD • This project is a win win situation (productivity, Income, Food security, Carbon credit) and should be considered for inclusion as a Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) • There is need for support to this initiative in order to benefit from the momentum so far generated as shown by the farmers & stakeholders interest.
    • COLLABORATING AGENCIES • MOAL&F • FAO • ILRI • CONSULTING AGENCY(UNIQUE)
    • THE END Thank You!